| Ranked All-Publication list | Historiographs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
| View: Overview | Sorted by GCS. |
Page 11 of 38: 1 [ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ] 21 31
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1001 | 0 | 106 | 2531 2001 ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY SCIENCE 31 (1): 108-118 Mintz PD; Mayers L; Avery N; Flanagan HL; Burks SG; et al. Review: Fibrin sealant: Clinical use and the development of the University of Virginia Tissue Adhesive Center | 0 | 4 |
| 1002 | 0 | 16 | 2556 2001 COMPUTERS IN NURSING 19 (3): 105-110 Ribbons B; Vance S Using e-mail to facilitate nursing scholarship | 0 | 4 |
| 1003 | 5 | 20 | 2587 2001 JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE 82 (12): 1719-1722 Arrive L; Dono P; Lewin M; Dahan H; Monnier-Cholley L; et al. Publication rate of papers originally presented at the National French Congress of Radiology in 1996 | 0 | 4 |
| 1004 | 0 | 23 | 2594 2001 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY 57 (10): 1245-1250 Rosen GM; Davison GC "Echo attributions" and other risks when publishing on novel therapies without peer review | 1 | 4 |
| 1005 | 0 | 2 | 2599 2001 JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING 14 (2): 222-223 Passadore DJ; Isoardi RA; Ariza PP; Padin C Use of a low-cost, PC-based image review workstation at a radiology department | 0 | 4 |
| 1006 | 0 | 12 | 2615 2001 JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT 76 (3): 369-378 Wood JM; Nezworski MT; Stejskal WJ; Garven S Advancing scientific discourse in the controversy surrounding the comprehensive system for the Rorschach: A rejoinder to Meyer (2000) | 0 | 4 |
| 1007 | 0 | 0 | 2621 2001 JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 122 (3): 419-420 Wechsler AS Peer review: Recognition and responsibility | 2 | 4 |
| 1008 | 1 | 30 | 2635 2001 MEDICAL EDUCATION 35: 20-28 Southgate L; Campbell M; Cox Y; Foulkes O; Jolly B; et al. The General Medical Council's Performance Procedures: the development and implementation of tests of competence with examples from general practice | 0 | 4 |
| 1009 | 0 | 4 | 2641 2001 NATURE 414 (6862): 393-394 Roy R; Ashburn JR The perils of peer review | 1 | 4 |
| 1010 | 0 | 10 | 2718 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE 23 (1): 43-46 Maglione MA; Stone EG; Shekelle PG Mass mailings have little effect on utilization of influenza vaccine among medicare beneficiaries | 0 | 4 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1011 | 0 | 6 | 2721 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 184 (1): 16-18 Allen JW; DeSimone KJ Valid peer review for surgeons working in small hospitals | 0 | 4 |
| 1012 | 4 | 10 | 2728 2002 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 40 (3): 329-333 Day FC; Schriger DL; Todd C; Wears RL The use of dedicated methodology and statistical reviewers for peer review: A content analysis of comments to authors made by methodology and regular reviewers | 3 | 4 |
| 1013 | 0 | 14 | 2744 2002 BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION 30 (11): 749-752 Ali MY; Oyama Y; Monreal J; Winter J; Tallman M; et al. Reassessing the definition of myeloid engraftment after autotransplantation: it is not necessary to see 0.5 X 10(9)/l neutrophils on 3 consecutive days to define myeloid recovery | 0 | 4 |
| 1014 | 0 | 66 | 2773 2002 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 30 (7): 1636-1643 Cook D; Brower R; Cooper J; Brochard L; Vincent JL Multicenter clinical research in adult critical care | 0 | 4 |
| 1015 | 0 | 22 | 2798 2002 HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY 21 (6): 624-628 McCaul KD; Johnson RJ; Rothman AJ The effects of framing and action instructions on whether older adults obtain flu shots | 0 | 4 |
| 1016 | 0 | 52 | 2844 2002 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PSYCHOANALYTIC ASSOCIATION 50 (2): 575-614 Doidge N; Simon B; Brauer L; Grant DC; First M; et al. Psychoanalytic patients in the US, Canada, and Australia: I. DSM-III-R disorders, indications, previous treatment medications, and length of treatment | 0 | 4 |
| 1017 | 0 | 2 | 2852 2002 LANCET 359 (9325): 2282-2282 Wallace H The need for independent scientific peer review of Biobank UK | 0 | 4 |
| 1018 | 0 | 45 | 2862 2002 MEDICAL CARE 40 (6): 500-509 Restuccia JD; Shwartz M; Kreger BE; Payne SMC; Ash AS; et al. Does more "appropriateness" explain higher rates of cardiac procedures among patients hospitalized with coronary heart disease? | 0 | 4 |
| 1019 | 0 | 26 | 2881 2002 PHARMACOECONOMICS 20: 21-30 Veenstra DL; Ramsey SD; Sullivan SD A guideline for the use of pharmacoeconomic models of diabetes treatment in the US managed-care environment | 0 | 4 |
| 1020 | 1 | 25 | 2903 2002 RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION 32 (2): 241-255 Eisenhart M The paradox of peer review: Admitting too much or allowing too little? | 4 | 4 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1021 | 0 | 54 | 2908 2002 REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA 34 (9): 851-856 Aldenkamp AP; Vermeulen J Effects of antiepileptics drugs on cognition | 0 | 4 |
| 1022 | 1 | 12 | 2924 2002 TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY 30 (1): 80-87 Deschl U; Kittel B; Rittinghausen S; Morawietz G; Kohler M; et al. The value of historical control data - Scientific advantages for pathologists, industry and agencies | 1 | 4 |
| 1023 | 0 | 15 | 2930 2002 VOX SANGUINIS 83 (3): 239-246 Chapman JF; Cook R The Blood Stocks Management Scheme, a partnership venture between the National Blood Service of England and North Wales and participating hospitals for maximizing blood supply chain management | 0 | 4 |
| 1024 | 5 | 40 | 2959 2003 ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 163 (15): 1813-1820 Isetts BJ; Brown LM; Schondelmeyer SW; Lenarz LA Quality assessment of a collaborative approach for decreasing drug-related morbidity and achieving therapeutic goals | 0 | 4 |
| 1025 | 2 | 24 | 3000 2003 FAMILY PRACTICE 20 (4): 443-451 Beyer M; Gerlach FM; Flies U; Grol R; Krol Z; et al. The development of quality circles/peer review groups as a method of quality improvement in Europe. Results of a survey in 26 European countries | 2 | 4 |
| 1026 | 0 | 27 | 3015 2003 INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL 36 (3): 166-173 Hommez GMG; Braem M; De Moor RJG Root canal treatment performed by Flemish dentists. Part 1. Cleaning and shaping | 0 | 4 |
| 1027 | 5 | 15 | 3064 2003 LEARNED PUBLISHING 16 (1): 15-20 Williamson A What will happen to peer review? | 1 | 4 |
| 1028 | 0 | 31 | 3091 2003 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 81 (3): 513-531 Radaelli CM The code of conduct against harmful tax competition: Open method of coordination in disguise? | 0 | 4 |
| 1029 | 0 | 15 | 3093 2003 RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY 69 (2): 189-194 Coles CE; Hoole ACF; Harden SV; Burnet NG; Twyman N; et al. Quantitative assessment of inter-clinician variability of target volume delineation for medulloblastorna: quality assurance for the SIOP PNET 4 trial protocol | 0 | 4 |
| 1030 | 2 | 18 | 3137 2004 ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS 32 (2): 111-117 Combes RD Peer review of validation studies: An assessment of the role of the OECD by reference to the validation of the uterotrophic assay for endocrine disruptors | 0 | 4 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1031 | 0 | 20 | 3166 2004 CLINICAL RADIOLOGY 59 (11): 1018-1024 Stavem K; Foss T; Botnmark O; Andersen OK; Erikssen J Inter-observer agreement in audit of quality of radiology requests and reports | 0 | 4 |
| 1032 | 0 | 54 | 3178 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY 7 (5): 357-368 Harrison C Peer review, politics and pluralism | 0 | 4 |
| 1033 | 0 | 88 | 3187 2004 FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT 198 (1-3): 89-103 Prisley SP; Mortimer MJ A synthesis of literature on evaluation of models for policy applications, with implications for forest carbon accounting | 0 | 4 |
| 1034 | 0 | 43 | 3211 2004 JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY 11 (2): 311-328 Arrowsmith J; Sisson K; Marginson P What can 'benchmarking' offer the open method of co-ordination? | 0 | 4 |
| 1035 | 2 | 78 | 3242 2004 LEARNED PUBLISHING 17 (1): 53-68 Bence V; Oppenheim C The role of academic journal publications in the UK Research Assessment Exercise | 2 | 4 |
| 1036 | 3 | 4 | 3245 2004 MARINE ECOLOGY-PROGRESS SERIES 277: 301-309 Riisgard HU Peer review: journal articles versus research proposals | 0 | 4 |
| 1037 | 0 | 35 | 3322 2005 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 100 (4): 918-926 Fitzsimmons D; Kahl S; Butturini G; van Wyk M; Bornman P; et al. Symptoms and quality of life in chronic pancreatitis assessed by structured interview and the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PAN26 | 0 | 4 |
| 1038 | 1 | 14 | 3356 2005 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 330 (7502): 1251-1253 Archer JC; Norcini J; Davies HA Use of SPRAT for peer review of paediatricians in training | 0 | 4 |
| 1039 | 5 | 28 | 3395 2005 HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 40 (2): 459-476 Bradley EH; Carlson MDA; Gallo WT; Scinto J; Campbell MK; et al. From adversary to partner: Have quality improvement organizations made the transition? | 0 | 4 |
| 1040 | 3 | 10 | 3469 2005 MEDICAL EDUCATION 39 (1): 90-97 Snell L; Spencer J Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal | 2 | 4 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1041 | 8 | 57 | 3487 2005 ORGANIZATION SCIENCE 16 (2): 180-200 Starbuck WH How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication | 1 | 4 |
| 1042 | 1 | 2 | 4 1970 CALIFORNIA MEDICINE 113 (6): 75-& DAIGER S PEER REVIEW - COST CONTROL OR QUALITY CONTROL | 0 | 3 |
| 1043 | 0 | 0 | 22 1972 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATION NS12 (4): 166-& LAVENTUR.M UTILIZATION AND PEER REVIEW BY PHARMACISTS | 0 | 3 |
| 1044 | 0 | 2 | 93 1975 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION 50 (10): 976-977 HADAMARD A; FINK S; DAUM SW; MICHEL RD NEW TOOL FOR PROGRAM-EVALUATION - CONSULTANT PEER REVIEW | 0 | 3 |
| 1045 | 0 | 1 | 115 1976 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 48 (11): A875-A875 PETRUZZI JM PEER REVIEW IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY | 0 | 3 |
| 1046 | 0 | 0 | 121 1976 HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY 27 (9): 660-663 CLAYTON T PEER REVIEW - PROGRESS REPORT | 2 | 3 |
| 1047 | 1 | 17 | 132 1976 PEDIATRICS 57 (5): 754-759 MARGILETH AM; THOMPSON HC; OSBORNE CE MANAGEMENT CRITERIA, DOCUMENTATION, AND PEER REVIEW OF INITIAL URINARY-TRACT INFECTION | 1 | 3 |
| 1048 | 0 | 0 | 143 1977 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 134: 11-14 SILVER LB; BRUNSTETTER R; RENSHAW D; COMER JP GOVERNMENTAL PEER REVIEW OF TRAINING-PROGRAMS IN CHILD-PSYCHIATRY | 0 | 3 |
| 1049 | 0 | 3 | 147 1977 AMERICAN SCIENTIST 65 (1): 17-20 SYMINGTON JW; KRAMER TR DOES PEER REVIEW WORK | 1 | 3 |
| 1050 | 0 | 1 | 148 1977 AMERICAN SCIENTIST 65 (3): 268-269 ROY R PEER REVIEW REVIEWED | 0 | 3 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1051 | 0 | 0 | 155 1977 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 2 (6078): 28-29 AYLETT M BOOKINGS AT A GP OBSTETRIC UNIT - EXERCISE IN PEER REVIEW | 0 | 3 |
| 1052 | 3 | 7 | 253 1979 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION 54 (7): 578-580 SLOANE P; LESSNE S; BORDEN S PEER-REVIEW BY RESIDENTS | 1 | 3 |
| 1053 | 0 | 0 | 290 1980 CLINICAL RESEARCH 28 (2): A292-A292 CHOKSHI AB; FRIEDMAN HS; MALACH MM; VASAVADA BC; BLEICHER SJ THE IMPACT OF PEER-REVIEW IN REDUCING THE NUMBER OF PERMANENT PACEMAKER INSERTIONS | 0 | 3 |
| 1054 | 0 | 0 | 319 1981 ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 141 (9): 1121-1121 SPODICK DH THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM AND THE EDITORS CORRESPONDENCE | 1 | 3 |
| 1055 | 0 | 0 | 322 1981 BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA 53 (8): 783-784 SPENCE AA SCIENTIFIC WRITING AND PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 3 |
| 1056 | 1 | 1 | 356 1981 SCIENCE 214 (4527): 1292-1292 ATKINSON RC THE PEER-REVIEW QUESTION | 2 | 3 |
| 1057 | 0 | 4 | 371 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 216-217 HONIG WM PEER-REVIEW IN THE PHYSICAL SCIENCES - AN EDITORS VIEW | 1 | 3 |
| 1058 | 0 | 0 | 380 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 235-236 ROSENTHAL R RELIABILITY AND BIAS IN PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES | 3 | 3 |
| 1059 | 0 | 0 | 417 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 5-8 STRICKER G; CLAIBORN WL; BENT RJ PEER-REVIEW - AN OVERVIEW | 0 | 3 |
| 1060 | 0 | 0 | 420 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 23-26 WILLENS J; DELEON PH POLITICAL ASPECTS OF PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 3 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1061 | 0 | 0 | 426 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 141-144 MORTON SI PEER-REVIEW - A VIEW FROM WITHIN | 0 | 3 |
| 1062 | 0 | 5 | 470 1983 JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION 22 (7): 287-289 BRANNIGAN CN; BURSON JZ REVAMPING THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 0 | 3 |
| 1063 | 0 | 4 | 480 1983 ONLINE 7 (5): 100-110 GLUNZ D; WAKIJI E MAXIMIZING SEARCH QUALITY THROUGH A PROGRAM OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 3 |
| 1064 | 2 | 3 | 522 1984 NATURE 312 (5995): 587-587 FORSDYKE DR PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 3 |
| 1065 | 0 | 2 | 553 1985 HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY 36 (5): 517-520 SHEPHERD GL FORMATS FOR PEER-REVIEW OF DYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY | 2 | 3 |
| 1066 | 0 | 9 | 560 1985 JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION 56 (1): 38-54 LEE BA FEDERAL-COURT INVOLVEMENT IN ACADEMIC PERSONNEL DECISIONS - IMPACT ON PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 3 |
| 1067 | 0 | 15 | 561 1985 JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION 36 (2): 18-21 COPELAND WD; JAMGOCHIAN R COLLEAGUE TRAINING AND PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 3 |
| 1068 | 1 | 4 | 606 1986 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 292 (6521): 646-646 MORGAN P PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICAL JOURNALS | 1 | 3 |
| 1069 | 0 | 1 | 624 1986 JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES 31 (3): 803-804 DAVIS JH PEER-REVIEW IN THE COURTROOM | 1 | 3 |
| 1070 | 0 | 4 | 672 1987 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 258 (1): 87-92 CARNEY MJ; LUNDBERG GD WEVE COME A LONG WAY - THANKS TO PEER-REVIEW | 2 | 3 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1071 | 0 | 22 | 716 1987 SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY 68 (3): 494-509 SIGELMAN L; WHICKER ML SOME IMPLICATIONS OF BIAS IN PEER-REVIEW - A SIMULATION-BASED ANALYSIS | 0 | 3 |
| 1072 | 0 | 16 | 717 1987 SOCIAL WORK 32 (3): 213-220 JACKSON JA CLINICAL SOCIAL-WORK AND PEER-REVIEW - A PROFESSIONAL LEAP AHEAD | 0 | 3 |
| 1073 | 0 | 110 | 765 1988 LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS 51 (2): 8-92 BLUMSTEIN JF; SLOAN FA ANTITRUST AND HOSPITAL PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 3 |
| 1074 | 1 | 13 | 787 1988 SOCIAL WORK 33 (4): 345-348 OSMAN S; SHUEMAN SA A GUIDE TO THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS FOR CLINICIANS | 0 | 3 |
| 1075 | 1 | 6 | 802 1989 AUSTRALIAN PAEDIATRIC JOURNAL 25 (4): 192-195 SMITH A; NOLAN T EVALUATION OF A CHILDRENS HOSPITAL MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW PROGRAM | 0 | 3 |
| 1076 | 0 | 0 | 814 1989 CURRENT SCIENCE 58 (20): 1114-1116 PRATHAP G A MODEST PROPOSAL FOR GLASNOST IN THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 3 | 3 |
| 1077 | 0 | 0 | 842 1989 JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 158 (4): A343-A343 RAMSAY AD; GALLAGHER PJ QUALITY-CONTROL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY BY PEER-REVIEW - THE SOUTHAMPTON EXPERIENCE | 1 | 3 |
| 1078 | 0 | 0 | 848 1989 NATURE 339 (6221): 164-164 ANDERSON A PEER-REVIEW - DOES IT WORK EFFICIENTLY | 1 | 3 |
| 1079 | 0 | 2 | 852 1989 NATURE 340 (6230): 173-173 ANDERSON A PLAGIARISM CHARGE CASTS SHADOW ON PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 3 |
| 1080 | 4 | 24 | 902 1990 EVALUATION REVIEW 14 (2): 151-165 LESLIE LZ PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES OF MASS-COMMUNICATION SCHOLARLY JOURNALS | 2 | 3 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1081 | 0 | 0 | 923 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 264 (24): 3144-3145 CANTEKIN EI; MCGUIRE TW; POTTER RL PEER-REVIEW AND DISSENTING MANUSCRIPTS - THE CANTEKIN CASE - REPLY | 0 | 3 |
| 1082 | 0 | 8 | 924 1990 JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION 61 (2): 198-219 WEEKS KM THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - CONFIDENTIALITY AND DISCLOSURE | 1 | 3 |
| 1083 | 1 | 8 | 991 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 141-141 COLMAN AM UNRELIABLE PEER-REVIEW - CAUSES AND CURES OF HUMAN MISERY | 0 | 3 |
| 1084 | 0 | 0 | 992 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 144-144 DELCOMYN F PEER-REVIEW - EXPLICIT CRITERIA AND TRAINING CAN HELP | 1 | 3 |
| 1085 | 0 | 0 | 1005 1991 BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER 63 (2): 168-170 TWENTYMAN P; SELBY P THE PROCESS OF PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 3 |
| 1086 | 2 | 6 | 1013 1991 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS 50 (1): 1-3 REIDENBERG JW; REIDENBERG MM REPORT OF A SURVEY OF SOME ASPECTS OF EDITORIAL-BOARD PEER-REVIEW AT CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY-AND-THERAPEUTICS | 2 | 3 |
| 1087 | 0 | 0 | 1023 1991 FLUORIDE 24 (3): 85-89 CARTON RJ NATIONAL TOXICOLOGY PROGRAM - CRITIQUE OF PEER-REVIEW DRAFT REPORT | 0 | 3 |
| 1088 | 2 | 8 | 1045 1991 JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE 33 (12): 1240-1243 TOMENSON JA; PADDLE GM BETTER QUALITY STUDIES THROUGH REVIEW OF PROTOCOLS | 0 | 3 |
| 1089 | 0 | 23 | 1052 1991 LIBRARY TRENDS 40 (2): 338-356 MORAN G; MALLORY M SOME ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION | 0 | 3 |
| 1090 | 2 | 10 | 1059 1991 NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL 104 (904): 8-10 TRACEY JM PEER-REVIEW .1. ATTITUDES TO INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL STANDARDS | 2 | 3 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1091 | 0 | 0 | 1061 1991 PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY 5 (3): 348-351 HOGG RJ TRIALS AND TRIBULATIONS OF MULTICENTER STUDIES | 0 | 3 |
| 1092 | 0 | 16 | 1088 1991 SURGERY 110 (1): 1-7 SIMMONS RL; POLK HC; WILLIAMS B; MAVROUDIS C MISCONDUCT AND FRAUD IN RESEARCH - SOCIAL AND LEGISLATIVE ISSUES SYMPOSIUM OF THE SOCIETY OF UNIVERSITY SURGEONS | 0 | 3 |
| 1093 | 0 | 0 | 1091 1991 TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY 19 (3): 290-292 BLACK HE PEER-REVIEW IN TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY - SOME RECOMMENDATIONS | 0 | 3 |
| 1094 | 1 | 9 | 1106 1992 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 82 (4): 525-527 FELDMAN SE; ROBLIN DW STANDARDS FOR PEER EVALUATION - THE HOSPITAL QUALITY ASSURANCE COMMITTEE | 1 | 3 |
| 1095 | 1 | 4 | 1109 1992 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 47 (12): 1679-1681 HOULIHAN D; HOFSCHULTE L; SACHAU D; PATTEN C CRITIQUING THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - EXAMINING A POTENTIAL DUAL ROLE-CONFLICT | 1 | 3 |
| 1096 | 0 | 6 | 1118 1992 ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE 116 (6): 602-604 CONN RB CAN CONTINUING MEDICAL-EDUCATION PREPARE THE CURRENT PRACTITIONER FOR THE 21ST-CENTURY | 1 | 3 |
| 1097 | 0 | 1 | 1201 1992 SCIENCE 256 (5059): 959-959 STONE R SCIENCE FUNDING - PEER-REVIEW CATCHES CONGRESSIONAL FLAK | 2 | 3 |
| 1098 | 0 | 9 | 1217 1992 WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 157 (5): 569-571 HEYDORN WH; MONCRIEF WH SIMULTANEOUS RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ABDOMINAL-AORTA AND CHOLECYSTECTOMY - A PEER-REVIEW PERSPECTIVE | 1 | 3 |
| 1099 | 18 | 58 | 1241 1993 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 27 (2): 311-318 BEATSON JA; LANCASTER JE PEER-REVIEW OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TREATMENTS IN PSYCHIATRY - A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE | 2 | 3 |
| 1100 | 4 | 8 | 1248 1993 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 16 (2): 401-403 CICCHETTI DV THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - ITS LIKE DEJA-VU ALL OVER AGAIN - AUTHORS RESPONSE | 2 | 3 |