Ranked All-Publication list HistoriographsGlossary  HistCite Guide  About
Mon Sep 25 15:45:47 2006

Papers found on Topic Search: "Peer Review"
Nodes: 3720, Authors: 6708, Journals: 1228, Cited References: 45083, Words: 5405, Tags: 1
Yearly outputDocument TypeLanguageInstitutionInstitution with SubdivisionCountry
Collection span: 1969 - 2006
View: Overview   Sorted by first author.

Page 1 of 38: [  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10 ]  11   21   31 

#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
101438 1982 SCIENCE 218 (4575): 840-840
AASLESTAD HG
PEER-REVIEW AT NIH
01
2003633 2006 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE 99 (8): 379-379
Abbasi K
JRSM introduces open peer review
00
3001188 1992 NATURE 358 (6381): 9-9
ABBOTT A
ITALIAN PEER-REVIEW UNDER PRESSURE
01
4011600 1995 NATURE 374 (6520): 299-299
ABBOTT A
ITALY WIDENS PEER-REVIEW OF HEALTH RESEARCH
01
5001756 1996 NATURE 383 (6601): 567-567
Abbott A
Funding cuts put pressure on peer review
16
6001920 1997 NATURE 387 (6633): 538-538
Abbott A
Italian universities move to peer review for grants
00
7012118 1998 NATURE 392 (6676): 531-531
Abbott A
Peer review outs power of Italy's 'barons'
00
81151406 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272 (2): 105-107
ABBY M; MASSEY MD; GALANDIUK S; POLK HC
PEER-REVIEW IS AN EFFECTIVE SCREENING PROCESS TO EVALUATE MEDICAL MANUSCRIPTS
618
909932 1990 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE 41 (3): 216-222
ABELSON P
MECHANISMS FOR EVALUATING SCIENTIFIC-INFORMATION AND THE ROLE OF PEER-REVIEW
12
101112876 2002 NERVENARZT 73 (10): 956-+
Abragam A; Lincke HO; Lux A; Wallech CW
Peer review of routine clinical case reports - an instrument of quality management? Results of a pilot investigation
12
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
111331084 1991 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 21 (1): 111-132
ABRAMS PA
THE PREDICTIVE ABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW OF GRANT PROPOSALS - THE CASE OF ECOLOGY AND THE UNITED-STATES-NATIONAL-SCIENCE-FOUNDATION
711
120713359 2005 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY 21 (12): 997-1006
Abramson BL; Huckell V
Canadian cardiovascular society consensus conference: Peripheral arterial disease - Executive summary
00
1303920 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 264 (24): 3143-3143
ABSHER JR
PEER-REVIEW AND THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
01
1401554 1985 HUMAN PATHOLOGY 16 (8): 761-762
ACKERMAN AB
THE PATHOLOGIST IN THE COURTROOM - PEER-REVIEW IS NEEDED
06
1500249 1979 HOSPITALS 53 (10): 91-&
ACKERMAN FK
MANAGEMENT PEER-REVIEW AUDITS EFFICIENCY
00
16072369 2000 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY 16 (10): 1249-1254
Ackman ML; Druteika D; Tsuyuki RT
Levels of evidence in cardiovascular clinical practice guidelines
03
170342090 1998 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS 186 (5): 528-533
Acosta JA; Yang JC; Winchell RJ; Simons RK; Fortlage DA; et al.
Lethal injuries and time to death in a level I trauma center
051
180481555 1995 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 30 (6): 643-662
Adair JG
The research environment in developing countries: Contributions to the national development of the discipline
010
1900364 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 196-196
ADAIR RK
A PHYSICS EDITOR COMMENTS ON PETERS AND CECIS PEER-REVIEW STUDY
210
20013671 2006 PHYSICS TODAY 59 (6): 9-9
Adair RK
Expanding the record on Einstein and peer review
00
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
21013513 2005 SCIENTIST 19 (19): 10-10
Adams DJ
Fixing NIH peer review
00
22012195 1999 ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE 153 (11): 1121-1122
Adams JA
Medical evaluation of suspected child sexual abuse - It's time for standardized training, referral centers, and routine peer review
06
2300987 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 135-135
ADAMS KM
PEER-REVIEW - AN UNFLATTERING PICTURE
22
24002921 2002 STROKE 33 (1): 326-326
Adams R; Acker J; Alberts M; Andrews L; Atkinson R; et al.
Recommendations for improving the quality of care through stroke centers and systems: An examination of stroke center identification options - Multidisciplinary consensus recommendations from the advisory working group on stroke center identification options of the American Stroke Association
00
25021695 1996 CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS 74 (7): 4-&
Adebodun F
Peer review reform
00
2608442 1983 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 73 (10): 1182-1185
ADLER NE; MILSTEIN A
EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF PHYSICIAN PEER-REVIEW - FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SUCCESSFUL PSROS
00
2700577 1985 PHYSICS TODAY 38 (7): 98-98
ADOMIAN G
PEER-REVIEW
00
28022465 2000 NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA 13 (2): 105-106
Aggarwal R
On peer review
00
2900935 1990 JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE 40 (3): 87-88
AGIUS RM
PEER-REVIEW AUDIT IN OCCUPATIONAL-MEDICINE
04
30001612 1995 OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD 45 (3): 125-130
AGIUS RM; SEATON A; LEE RJ
AUDIT OF SICKNESS ABSENCE AND FITNESS-FOR-WORK REFERRALS
010
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
31002143 1998 SCIENTIST 12 (10): 1-+
Agnew B
New NIH procedures to shield clinicians from grants bias
10
32002311 1999 SCIENCE 286 (5442): 1074-1076
Agnew B
Biomedical research - NIH eyes sweeping reform of peer review
02
33002312 1999 SCIENCE 286 (5444): 1453-1454
Agnew B
NIH - Protests win changes to peer-review proposal
00
340362010 1998 CLIMATIC CHANGE 39 (4): 621-642
Agrawala S
Structural and process history of the intergovernmental panel on climate change
013
3500713 1987 SCIENTIST 1 (19): 7-7
AGRES T
NAS FAULTS PEER-REVIEW AT USDA
00
3600777 1988 SCIENTIST 2 (1): 6-6
AGRES T
NSF PUSHED TO OPEN UP PEER-REVIEW
00
3701778 1988 SCIENTIST 2 (3): 5-5
AGRES T
USDA TO STRENGTHEN PEER-REVIEW
00
38013514 2005 SCIENTIST 19 (22): 26-27
Agres T
Reviewing peer review
00
39003704 2006 SCIENTIST 20 (7): 72-72
Agres T
Theroundup - Patent peer review
00
400132475 2000 ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW 24 (2): 138-143
Aguillo I
A new generation of tools for search, recovery and quality evaluation of World Wide Web medical resources
02
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
410171939 1997 REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE 125 (7): 765-774
Aguirre CL
History of Revista Medica de Chile from its foundations in 1872 until 1997
00
42012083 1998 JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 30 (1): 38-46
Ahmed HS
The current status of science journals published in Bangladesh
11
439133052 2003 JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 34 (4): 236-248
Ahmed HS
Does peer review process exist in developing-country journals?: The Bangladesh experience
00
44002836 2002 JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 39 (1): VII-VIII
Aisen ML
Judging the judges: Keeping objectivity in peer review - Guest editorial
00
450383714 2006 TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION 11 (3): 265-278
Aitchison C; Lee A
Research writing: problems and pedagogies
00
46091817 1997 ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE 17 (3): 326-327
Ajlouni KM; AlKhalidi U
Medical records, patient outcome, and peer review in eleventh-century Arab medicine
13
470461743 1996 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF HEALTH 116 (4): 245-252
AlAssaf AF
Healthcare outcomes management and quality improvement
00
480111967 1998 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 73 (7): 756-761
Albanese M; Horowitz S; Moss R; Farrell P
An institutionally funded program for educational research and development grants: It makes dollars and sense
07
49001914 1997 LANCET 350 (9080): 822-822
Albert T
Why bother with peer review?
25
50002205 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 319 (7213): 861-861
Albert T
Personal view - Peer review: thinking the unthinkable
22
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
510542908 2002 REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA 34 (9): 851-856
Aldenkamp AP; Vermeulen J
Effects of antiepileptics drugs on cognition
04
52001056 1991 NATURE 349 (6307): 272-272
ALDHOUS P
PEER-REVIEW - A CLEANISH BILL OF HEALTH
00
530562227 1999 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY 15 (9): 847-852
Alexander FE
Clusters and clustering of childhood cancer: A review
04
540102213 1999 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS 95 (1): 41-48
Alexander GC; Robinette MB; Thorman JM; Lu XX
Use peer-review of chemical processes for extra safety
01
55273468 2005 MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL 9 (1): 113-117
Alexander GR
A guide to reviewing manuscripts
01
562153158 2004 CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES 18 (2): 135-138
Alexandrov AV
How to write a research paper
03
570142744 2002 BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION 30 (11): 749-752
Ali MY; Oyama Y; Monreal J; Winter J; Tallman M; et al.
Reassessing the definition of myeloid engraftment after autotransplantation: it is not necessary to see 0.5 X 10(9)/l neutrophils on 3 consecutive days to define myeloid recovery
04
58131816 1997 ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE 17 (3): 277-278
AlKawi MZ
History of medical records and peer review
00
59001943 1997 SCIENCE 275 (5299): 469-469
Allakhverdov A; Lawler A
Peer review lands safely in Russia
00
60031835 1997 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 314 (7090): 1352-1352
Allan B; Morlet N; Wormald R
Journals and the Internet - Use of the Internet for on line peer review must be explored further
02
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
6119471 1983 JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION 22 (7): 296-299
ALLBRITTEN D; MEGEL ME; BUCKLEY KA; SCALONE MRC; PANWAR S
FACULTY PEER-REVIEW - AN EVOLVING PROCESS
01
6212801 1989 ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY 125 (7): 1001-1002
ALLEN AD
SPEAKING OF PEER-REVIEW ...
00
630113222 2004 JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY 19 (2): 149-155
Allen BL; Burt P; Roychoudhury C; Chen BR
Analysis of OBQI outcomes in participating Michigan home health agencies
01
64062721 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 184 (1): 16-18
Allen JW; DeSimone KJ
Valid peer review for surgeons working in small hospitals
04
65002129 1998 PHYSICS WORLD 11 (10): 18-19
Allen L
The lottery of peer review
01
6633231 1979 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 136 (4): 444-447
ALLEN MG
PEER-REVIEW OF GROUP-THERAPY - WASHINGTON, DC, 1972-1977
47
671227770 1988 PSYCHIATRIC ANNALS 18 (8): 487-491
ALLEN MG
PSYCHIATRIC PEER-REVIEW - A CURRENT PERSPECTIVE
00
680442150 1998 STATISTICS IN MEDICINE 17 (23): 2661-2674
Altman DG
Statistical reviewing for medical journals
322
69142751 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 325 (7362): 492-492
Altman DG; Moher D; Schulz KF
Peer review of statistics in medical research - Reporting power calculations is important
01
70042972 2003 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 326 (7396): 985-985
Altman DG
New edicts for letters - Restrictions should not be imposed on post-publication peer review
00
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
71012060 1998 JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP 24 (6): 496-497
Altman E
Silencing scientists and scholars in other fields: Power, paradigm controls, peer review, and scholarly communication.
00
722321745 1996 LANCET 347 (9012): 1382-1386
Altman LK
The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review .1.
640
731411746 1996 LANCET 347 (9013): 1459-1463
Altman LK
The ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review .2.
532
7412939 1990 MAGNESIUM AND TRACE ELEMENTS 9 (3): 117-118
ALTURA BT
IS ANONYMOUS PEER-REVIEW THE BEST WAY TO REVIEW AND ACCEPT MANUSCRIPTS
00
75118837 1989 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY 7 (12): 1845-1851
ALVEGARD TA; BERG NO
HISTOPATHOLOGY PEER-REVIEW OF HIGH-GRADE SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMA - THE SCANDINAVIAN-SARCOMA-GROUP EXPERIENCE
251
76001203 1992 SCIENCE 258 (5083): 736-736
AMATO I
MATERIALS SCIENCE - ROY,RUSTUM - PR IS A BETTER SYSTEM THAN PEER-REVIEW
12
77001330 1993 SCIENCE 259 (5091): 14-14
AMATO I
PEER-REVIEW OR PERFORMANCE REVIEW - REPLY
00
780302265 1999 JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY 44 (6): 592-599
Ament L
Quality management activities in the obstetric triage setting
00
79003307 2005 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 229: U711-U711
Amero SA
Peer review of bioimaging and bioengineering grant applications at the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
00
80002861 2002 MATERIALS PERFORMANCE 41 (9): 8-8
Amos GA
The experience of peer review
00
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
811913169 2004 CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN 10 (18): 2231-2238
Ananth J; Parameswaran S; Gunatilake S
Antipsychotic polypharmacy
06
820152850 2002 JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH & GENDER-BASED MEDICINE 11 (4): 379-388
Andejeski Y; Bisceglio IT; Dickersin K; Johnson JE; Robinson SI; et al.
Quantitative impact of including consumers in the scientific review of breast cancer research proposals
02
8300848 1989 NATURE 339 (6221): 164-164
ANDERSON A
PEER-REVIEW - DOES IT WORK EFFICIENTLY
13
8402852 1989 NATURE 340 (6230): 173-173
ANDERSON A
PLAGIARISM CHARGE CASTS SHADOW ON PEER-REVIEW
03
85001186 1992 NATURE 357 (6374): 103-103
ANDERSON C
PEER-REVIEW LOSES OUT IN CONGRESSIONAL CUTTING SPREE
01
860243111 2003 WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN 31 (1): 296-305
Anderson DR; Cooch EG; Gutierrez RJ; Krebs CJ; Lindberg MS; et al.
Rigorous science: suggestions on how to raise the bar
06
87041769 1996 ORTHOPEDICS 19: 9-11
Anderson FA; Audet AM
Physician practices in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis: The MassPRO DVT study
015
8800691 1987 NEW SCIENTIST 115 (1568): 16-16
ANDERSON I
PEER-REVIEW ROCKED BY ARGUMENT OVER SEISMIC CENTER
00
89012830 2002 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION ETHICS 11 (1): 83-86
Anderson J
Silencing scientists and scholars in other fields: Power, paradigm controls, peer review, and scholarly communication
00
900112601 2001 JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY 34 (1): 41-47
Anderson ST; Pahlm O; Bacharova L; Barbagelata A; Chaitman BR; et al.
Standards for the function of an academic 12-lead electrocardiographic core laboratory
01
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
91031830 1997 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 182 (9): 331-331
Andlaw RJ
Peer review
00
920161706 1996 ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY 101 (2): 129-144
Andreassen S; Rosenfalck A; Falck B; Olesen KG; Andersen SK
Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the expert EMG assistant MUNIN
09
93013457 2005 KYBERNETES 34 (9-10): 1656-1658
Andrew AM
Internet commentary - Cybernetics and systems on the web: hoax paper, nanotechnology
00
94001038 1991 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 44: S131-S134
ANDREWS JS
DOES GOOD PEER-REVIEW ASSURE GOOD EPIDEMIOLOGY
01
95001462 1994 PERSONNEL JOURNAL 73 (1): 64-64
ANFUSO D
PEER-REVIEW WARDS OFF UNIONS AND LAWSUITS
00
96173289 2004 SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL 25: S13-S17
Antony SX; Al-Hussaini A
Success of an unconventional workflow
01
9700247 1979 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 38 (13): 2649-2650
APIRION D
RESEARCH FUNDING AND THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM
69
9800296 1980 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 39 (7): 2351-2351
APIRION D
THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM - REPLY
00
99032479 1983 NUCLEAR SAFETY 24 (6): 792-800
APOSTOLAKIS G; GARRICK BJ; OKRENT D
ON QUALITY, PEER-REVIEW, AND THE ACHIEVEMENT OF CONSENSUS IN PROBABILISTIC RISK ANALYSIS
04
1000253287 2004 RISK ANALYSIS 24 (3): 515-520
Apostolakis GE
How useful is quantitative risk assessment?
07

Page 1 of 38: [  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10 ]  11   21   31