| Ranked All-Publication list | Historiographs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
| View: Overview | Sorted by LCS. |
Page 1 of 38: [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ] 11 21 31
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 60 | 363 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 187-195 PETERS DP; CECI SJ PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNALS - THE FATE OF ACCEPTED, PUBLISHED ARTICLES, SUBMITTED AGAIN | 68 | 250 |
| 2 | 5 | 14 | 911 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263 (10): 1371-1376 MCNUTT RA; EVANS AT; FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON THE QUALITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL | 56 | 111 |
| 3 | 1 | 24 | 914 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263 (10): 1438-1441 HORROBIN DF THE PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS OF PEER-REVIEW AND THE SUPPRESSION OF INNOVATION | 48 | 106 |
| 4 | 1 | 5 | 354 1981 SCIENCE 214 (4523): 881-886 COLE S; COLE JR; SIMON GA CHANCE AND CONSENSUS IN PEER-REVIEW | 47 | 152 |
| 5 | 17 | 182 | 986 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 119-134 CICCHETTI DV THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY INVESTIGATION | 41 | 94 |
| 6 | 2 | 28 | 569 1985 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 312 (10): 654-657 BAILAR JC; PATTERSON K JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW - THE NEED FOR A RESEARCH AGENDA | 38 | 64 |
| 7 | 5 | 14 | 1405 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272 (2): 96-97 KASSIRER JP; CAMPION EW PEER-REVIEW - CRUDE AND UNDERSTUDIED, BUT INDISPENSABLE | 38 | 59 |
| 8 | 3 | 39 | 1159 1992 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 267 (7): 958-960 GOLDMAN RL THE RELIABILITY OF PEER ASSESSMENTS OF QUALITY OF CARE | 36 | 127 |
| 9 | 7 | 12 | 2048 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280 (3): 234-237 van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review - A randomized trial | 34 | 60 |
| 10 | 1 | 6 | 2050 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280 (3): 240-242 Justice AC; Cho MK; Winker MA; Berlin JA; Rennie D Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? - A randomized controlled trial | 31 | 56 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 11 | 5 | 25 | 1409 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272 (2): 143-146 FISHER M; FRIEDMAN SB; STRAUSS B THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON ACCEPTANCE OF RESEARCH PAPERS BY PEER-REVIEW | 30 | 50 |
| 12 | 0 | 4 | 54 1974 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 56 (5): 686-692 INGELFIN.FJ PEER REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION | 29 | 79 |
| 13 | 6 | 11 | 904 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263 (10): 1317-1317 RENNIE D EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION - THE 1ST-INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS | 29 | 49 |
| 14 | 2 | 6 | 2049 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280 (3): 237-240 Godlee F; Gale CR; Martyn CN Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports - A randomized controlled trial | 29 | 56 |
| 15 | 10 | 36 | 1355 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121 (1): 11-21 GOODMAN SN; BERLIN J; FLETCHER SW; FLETCHER RH MANUSCRIPT QUALITY BEFORE AND AFTER PEER-REVIEW AND EDITING AT ANNALS OF INTERNAL-MEDICINE | 28 | 76 |
| 16 | 4 | 11 | 2199 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318 (7175): 23-27 van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Black N; Smith R Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial | 28 | 41 |
| 17 | 2 | 8 | 620 1986 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 256 (17): 2391-2392 RENNIE D GUARDING THE GUARDIANS - A CONFERENCE ON EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW | 26 | 50 |
| 18 | 0 | 7 | 905 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263 (10): 1321-1322 KRONICK DA PEER-REVIEW IN 18TH-CENTURY SCIENTIFIC JOURNALISM | 26 | 48 |
| 19 | 2 | 14 | 1919 1997 NATURE 387 (6631): 341-343 Wenneras C; Wold A Nepotism and sexism in peer-review | 26 | 129 |
| 20 | 4 | 21 | 1160 1992 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 267 (17): 2349-2354 RUBIN HR; ROGERS WH; KAHN KL; RUBENSTEIN LV; BROOK RH WATCHING THE DOCTOR-WATCHERS - HOW WELL DO PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATION METHODS DETECT HOSPITAL-CARE QUALITY PROBLEMS | 25 | 105 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 21 | 0 | 88 | 906 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263 (10): 1323-1329 BURNHAM JC THE EVOLUTION OF EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW | 24 | 41 |
| 22 | 8 | 9 | 1403 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272 (2): 91-91 RENNIE D; FLANAGIN A THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION | 24 | 38 |
| 23 | 15 | 28 | 2362 2000 BRAIN 123: 1964-1969 Rothwell PM; Martyn CN Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience - Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? | 22 | 33 |
| 24 | 1 | 10 | 862 1989 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 321 (12): 827-829 RELMAN AS; ANGELL M HOW GOOD IS PEER-REVIEW | 19 | 41 |
| 25 | 19 | 27 | 2811 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287 (21): 2784-2786 Jefferson T; Alderson P; Wager E; Davidoff F Effects of editorial peer review - A systematic review | 19 | 27 |
| 26 | 4 | 22 | 1233 1993 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 118 (7): 550-556 HAYWARD RA; MCMAHON LF; BERNARD AM EVALUATING THE CARE OF GENERAL MEDICINE INPATIENTS - HOW GOOD IS IMPLICIT REVIEW | 18 | 53 |
| 27 | 1 | 3 | 1839 1997 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 315 (7111): 759-760 Smith R Peer review: Reform or revolution? | 18 | 34 |
| 28 | 9 | 16 | 1369 1994 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 309 (6948): 143-144 SMITH R PROMOTING RESEARCH INTO PEER-REVIEW | 17 | 28 |
| 29 | 4 | 14 | 1408 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272 (2): 139-142 GILBERT JR; WILLIAMS ES; LUNDBERG GD IS THERE GENDER BIAS IN JAMAS PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 17 | 31 |
| 30 | 0 | 5 | 1410 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272 (2): 147-149 LABAND DN; PIETTE MJ A CITATION ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF BLINDED PEER-REVIEW | 17 | 29 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 31 | 3 | 11 | 1748 1996 LANCET 348 (9040): 1480-1483 Pierie JPEN; Walvoort HC; Overbeke AJPM Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde | 17 | 26 |
| 32 | 3 | 5 | 2051 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280 (3): 243-245 Cho MK; Justice AC; Winker MA; Berlin JA; Waeckerle JF; et al. Masking author identity in peer review - What factors influence masking success? | 17 | 27 |
| 33 | 9 | 14 | 2198 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318 (7175): 4-5 Smith R Opening up BMJ peer review - A beginning that should lead to complete transparency | 17 | 27 |
| 34 | 0 | 12 | 43 1973 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 288 (25): 1323-1329 BROOK RH; APPEL FA QUALITY-OF-CARE ASSESSMENT - CHOOSING A METHOD FOR PEER REVIEW | 16 | 209 |
| 35 | 0 | 3 | 1069 1991 RADIOLOGY 178 (3): 637-642 SIEGELMAN SS ASSASSINS AND ZEALOTS - VARIATIONS IN PEER-REVIEW - SPECIAL REPORT | 15 | 29 |
| 36 | 1 | 17 | 1747 1996 LANCET 348 (9037): 1293-1295 Horrobin DF Peer review of grant applications: A harbinger for mediocrity in clinical research? | 15 | 28 |
| 37 | 3 | 14 | 2252 1999 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 52 (7): 625-629 van Rooyen S; Black N; Godlee F Development of the Review Quality Instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts | 15 | 23 |
| 38 | 0 | 3 | 194 1977 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN 237 (4): 34-41 COLE S; RUBIN L; COLE JR PEER REVIEW AND SUPPORT OF SCIENCE | 14 | 51 |
| 39 | 0 | 8 | 908 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263 (10): 1344-1347 WELLER AC EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN UNITED-STATES MEDICAL JOURNALS | 14 | 33 |
| 40 | 1 | 40 | 1039 1991 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 44 (1): 91-98 OXMAN AD; GUYATT GH; SINGER J; GOLDSMITH CH; HUTCHISON BG; et al. AGREEMENT AMONG REVIEWERS OF REVIEW ARTICLES | 14 | 77 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 41 | 17 | 46 | 2097 1998 LANCET 352 (9124): 301-305 Wessely S Peer review of grant applications: what do we know? | 14 | 20 |
| 42 | 7 | 61 | 276 1979 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 9 (2): 199-232 MITROFF II; CHUBIN DE PEER-REVIEW AT THE NSF - DIALECTICAL POLICY ANALYSIS | 13 | 30 |
| 43 | 7 | 10 | 2808 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287 (21): 2759-2760 Rennie D Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication | 13 | 28 |
| 44 | 11 | 20 | 2809 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287 (21): 2762-2765 Godlee F Making reviewers visible - Openness, accountability, and credit | 13 | 21 |
| 45 | 22 | 39 | 2812 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287 (21): 2786-2790 Jefferson T; Wager E; Davidoff F Measuring the quality of editorial peer review | 13 | 21 |
| 46 | 2 | 31 | 1404 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272 (2): 92-94 JUDSON HF STRUCTURAL TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE SCIENCES AND THE END OF PEER-REVIEW | 12 | 26 |
| 47 | 0 | 14 | 1407 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272 (2): 119-121 ROBERTS JC; FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW EFFECTS OF PEER-REVIEW AND EDITING ON THE READABILITY OF ARTICLES PUBLISHED IN ANNALS OF INTERNAL-MEDICINE | 12 | 34 |
| 48 | 0 | 0 | 467 1983 JOURNAL OF NEUROBIOLOGY 14 (2): 95-112 OSMOND DH MALICES WONDERLAND - RESEARCH FUNDING AND PEER-REVIEW | 11 | 24 |
| 49 | 3 | 20 | 658 1987 CHEST 91 (2): 252-255 ROBIN ED; BURKE CM PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICAL JOURNALS | 11 | 15 |
| 50 | 0 | 15 | 910 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263 (10): 1353-1354 EVANS JT; NADJARI HI; BURCHELL SA QUOTATIONAL AND REFERENCE ACCURACY IN SURGICAL JOURNALS - A CONTINUING PEER-REVIEW PROBLEM | 11 | 71 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 51 | 1 | 26 | 1414 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272 (2): 158-162 SCHERER RW; DICKERSIN K; LANGENBERG P FULL PUBLICATION OF RESULTS INITIALLY PRESENTED IN ABSTRACTS - A METAANALYSIS | 11 | 126 |
| 52 | 2 | 19 | 1432 1994 JOURNAL OF LABORATORY AND CLINICAL MEDICINE 124 (2): 178-182 ERNST E; RESCH KL REVIEWER BIAS - A BLINDED EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY | 11 | 16 |
| 53 | 0 | 0 | 1575 1995 JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE 10 (8): 443-450 WILKES MS; KRAVITZ RL POLICIES, PRACTICES, AND ATTITUDES OF NORTH-AMERICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL EDITORS | 11 | 29 |
| 54 | 4 | 7 | 2045 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280 (3): 213-213 Rennie D; Flanagin A Congress on Biomedical Peer Review - History, ethics, and plans for the future | 11 | 26 |
| 55 | 4 | 8 | 2364 2000 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 176: 47-51 Walsh E; Rooney M; Appleby L; Wilkinson G Open peer review: a randomised controlled trial | 11 | 17 |
| 56 | 1 | 77 | 574 1985 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 313 (18): 1131-1137 DANS PE; WEINER JP; OTTER SE PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS - PROMISES AND POTENTIAL PITFALLS | 10 | 48 |
| 57 | 0 | 20 | 840 1989 JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION 57 (2): 151-169 MARSH HW; BALL S THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS USED TO EVALUATE MANUSCRIPTS SUBMITTED TO ACADEMIC JOURNALS - INTERJUDGMENTAL RELIABILITY | 10 | 17 |
| 58 | 0 | 0 | 970 1990 WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 153 (5): 520-522 RELMAN AS PEER-REVIEW IN SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS - WHAT GOOD IS IT | 10 | 14 |
| 59 | 0 | 1 | 1290 1993 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 270 (23): 2775-& COTTON P FLAWS DOCUMENTED, REFORMS DEBATED AT CONGRESS ON JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW | 10 | 10 |
| 60 | 8 | 17 | 1291 1993 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 270 (23): 2856-2858 RENNIE D MORE PEERING INTO EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW | 10 | 13 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 61 | 28 | 181 | 2141 1998 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 19 (3): 181-211 Campanario JM Peer review for journals as it stands today - Part 1 | 10 | 16 |
| 62 | 9 | 21 | 2200 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318 (7175): 44-45 Goldbeck-Wood S Evidence on peer review - scientific quality control or smokescreen? | 10 | 15 |
| 63 | 2 | 53 | 257 1979 MEDICAL CARE 17 (3): 1-73 HULKA BS; ROMM FJ; PARKERSON GR; RUSSELL IT; CLAPP NE; et al. PEER REVIEW IN AMBULATORY CARE - USE OF EXPLICIT CRITERIA AND IMPLICIT JUDGMENTS | 9 | 60 |
| 64 | 0 | 0 | 372 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 217-218 HORROBIN DF PEER-REVIEW - A PHILOSOPHICALLY FAULTY CONCEPT WHICH IS PROVING DISASTROUS FOR SCIENCE | 9 | 20 |
| 65 | 1 | 12 | 958 1990 SCIENTOMETRICS 19 (5-6): 419-425 HARTMANN I; NEIDHARDT F PEER-REVIEW AT THE DEUTSCHE-FORSCHUNGSGEMEINSCHAFT | 9 | 12 |
| 66 | 0 | 0 | 988 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 137-137 BAILAR JC RELIABILITY, FAIRNESS, OBJECTIVITY, AND OTHER INAPPROPRIATE GOALS IN PEER-REVIEW | 9 | 12 |
| 67 | 6 | 9 | 1411 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272 (2): 152-153 SWEITZER BJ; CULLEN DJ HOW WELL DOES A JOURNALS PEER-REVIEW PROCESS FUNCTION - A SURVEY OF AUTHORS OPINIONS | 9 | 14 |
| 68 | 3 | 25 | 1793 1996 SCIENTOMETRICS 36 (3): 397-420 vanRaan AFJ Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises | 9 | 54 |
| 69 | 5 | 10 | 1983 1998 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 128 (1): 66-68 Davidoff F Masking, blinding, and peer review: The blind leading the blinded | 9 | 19 |
| 70 | 4 | 11 | 2098 1998 LANCET 352 (9126): 441-445 Bingham CM; Higgins G; Coleman R; Van Der Weyden MB The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study | 9 | 20 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 71 | 1 | 23 | 26 1973 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 130 (3): 381-385 [Anon] POSITION STATEMENT ON PEER REVIEW IN PSYCHIATRY | 8 | 0 |
| 72 | 1 | 3 | 57 1974 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 131 (12): 1363-1366 NEWMAN DE; LUFT LL PEER REVIEW PROCESS - EDUCATION VERSUS CONTROL | 8 | 18 |
| 73 | 0 | 0 | 870 1989 SCIENCE 244 (4907): 910-912 SUN M PEER-REVIEW COMES UNDER PEER-REVIEW | 8 | 16 |
| 74 | 1 | 63 | 1004 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 167-186 CICCHETTI DV REFLECTIONS FROM THE PEER-REVIEW MIRROR | 8 | 12 |
| 75 | 4 | 24 | 1356 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121 (1): 60-61 LOCK S DOES EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW WORK | 8 | 12 |
| 76 | 5 | 67 | 1383 1994 EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 17 (1): 3-21 GOLDMAN RL THE RELIABILITY OF PEER ASSESSMENTS - A METAANALYSIS | 8 | 12 |
| 77 | 1 | 9 | 1412 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272 (2): 154-156 SCHULMAN K; SULMASY DP; RONEY D ETHICS, ECONOMICS, AND THE PUBLICATION POLICIES OF MAJOR MEDICAL JOURNALS | 8 | 24 |
| 78 | 5 | 21 | 1703 1996 CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS 17 (1): 1-12 Jadad AR; Moore RA; Carroll D; Jenkinson C; Reynolds DJM; et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? | 8 | 1447 |
| 79 | 4 | 20 | 1877 1997 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 278 (19): 1573-1578 Smith MA; Atherly AJ; Kane RL; Pacala JT Peer review of the quality of care - Reliability and sources of variability for outcome and process assessments | 8 | 27 |
| 80 | 2 | 2 | 1993 1998 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 316 (7125): 86-86 Goldbeck-Wood S What makes a good reviewer of manuscripts? The BMJ invites you to join its peer review process | 8 | 17 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 81 | 3 | 17 | 2052 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280 (3): 257-259 Weber EJ; Callaham ML; Wears RL; Barton C; Young G Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting - Why investigators fail to publish | 8 | 48 |
| 82 | 8 | 19 | 2748 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 324 (7348): 1271-1273 Bacchetti P Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem | 8 | 20 |
| 83 | 2 | 7 | 2810 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287 (21): 2781-2783 Callahan ML; Knopp RK; Gallagher EJ Effect of written feedback by editors on quality of reviews - Two tandomized trials | 8 | 11 |
| 84 | 5 | 10 | 2813 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287 (21): 2790-2793 Weber EJ; Katz PP; Waeckerle JF; Callahan ML Author perception of peer review - Impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction | 8 | 12 |
| 85 | 0 | 8 | 271 1979 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 10 (4): 631-639 CLAIBORN WL; STRICKER G PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS, PEER-REVIEW, AND CHAMPUS | 7 | 11 |
| 86 | 1 | 10 | 333 1981 JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY 49 (4): 583-589 COHEN LH; OYSTERNELSON CK CLINICIANS EVALUATIONS OF PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY - EXPERIMENTAL-DATA ON PSYCHOLOGICAL PEER-REVIEW | 7 | 16 |
| 87 | 1 | 12 | 396 1982 BULLETIN OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY 2 (5): 405-422 ROY R PEER-REVIEW OF PROPOSALS - RATIONALE, PRACTICE AND PERFORMANCE | 7 | 15 |
| 88 | 0 | 0 | 528 1984 SCIENCE 226 (4681): 1401-1401 CULLITON BJ FINE-TUNING PEER-REVIEW | 7 | 8 |
| 89 | 3 | 27 | 735 1988 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 296 (6624): 774-777 SMITH R RESEARCH POLICY - PROBLEMS WITH PEER-REVIEW AND ALTERNATIVES | 7 | 17 |
| 90 | 3 | 15 | 907 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263 (10): 1330-1332 KNOLL E THE COMMUNITIES OF SCIENTISTS AND JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW | 7 | 12 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 91 | 0 | 1 | 912 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263 (10): 1376-1378 GARFUNKEL JM; LAWSON EE; HAMRICK HJ; ULSHEN MH EFFECT OF ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION ON THE AUTHORS EVALUATION OF PEER-REVIEW OF MEDICAL MANUSCRIPTS | 7 | 11 |
| 92 | 6 | 22 | 1074 1991 SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES 16 (3): 322-341 TRAVIS GDL; COLLINS HM NEW LIGHT ON OLD BOYS - COGNITIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL PARTICULARISM IN THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM | 7 | 17 |
| 93 | 1 | 33 | 1084 1991 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 21 (1): 111-132 ABRAMS PA THE PREDICTIVE ABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW OF GRANT PROPOSALS - THE CASE OF ECOLOGY AND THE UNITED-STATES-NATIONAL-SCIENCE-FOUNDATION | 7 | 11 |
| 94 | 0 | 8 | 1114 1992 ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY 3 (3): 187-191 DEBELLEFEUILLE C; MORRISON CA; TANNOCK IF THE FATE OF ABSTRACTS SUBMITTED TO A CANCER MEETING - FACTORS WHICH INFLUENCE PRESENTATION AND SUBSEQUENT PUBLICATION | 7 | 44 |
| 95 | 0 | 2 | 1413 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272 (2): 156-158 COLAIANNI LA PEER-REVIEW IN JOURNALS INDEXED IN INDEX-MEDICUS | 7 | 12 |
| 96 | 3 | 13 | 1982 1998 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 32 (3): 318-322 Callaham ML; Wears RL; Waeckerle JF Effect of attendance at a training session on peer reviewer quality and performance | 7 | 8 |
| 97 | 22 | 150 | 2142 1998 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 19 (4): 277-306 Campanario JM Peer review for journals as it stands today - Part 2 | 7 | 11 |
| 98 | 4 | 13 | 2406 2000 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 12 (3): 169-175 Shaw CD External quality mechanisms for health care: summary of the ExPeRT project on visitatie, accreditation, EFQM and ISO assessment in European Union countries | 7 | 23 |
| 99 | 11 | 15 | 2720 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 179 (6): 1415-1417 Katz DS; Proto AV; Olmsted WW Incidence and nature of unblinding by authors: Our experience at two radiology journals with double-blinded peer review policies | 7 | 12 |
| 100 | 0 | 1 | 2873 2002 NATURE 416 (6878): 258-260 Gura T Peer review, unmasked | 7 | 12 |