| Ranked All-Publication list | Historiographs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
| View: Overview | Sorted by journal name. |
Page 7 of 38: [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ] 11 21 31
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 601 | 0 | 3 | 375 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 227-228 MITROFF II DESIGNING PEER-REVIEW FOR THE SUBJECTIVE AS WELL AS THE OBJECTIVE SIDE OF SCIENCE | 0 | 1 |
| 602 | 0 | 10 | 376 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 229-230 OVER R WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF BIAS IN PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 6 |
| 603 | 0 | 0 | 377 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 230-231 PALERMO DS BIASES, DECISIONS AND AUCTORIAL REBUTTAL IN THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 1 | 2 |
| 604 | 0 | 3 | 378 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 232-233 PERLOFF RM; PERLOFF R IMPROVING RESEARCH ON AND POLICIES FOR PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES | 2 | 5 |
| 605 | 0 | 1 | 379 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 233-234 PORTER AL 2004 - A SCENARIO OF PEER-REVIEW IN THE FUTURE | 0 | 0 |
| 606 | 0 | 0 | 380 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 235-236 ROSENTHAL R RELIABILITY AND BIAS IN PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES | 3 | 3 |
| 607 | 0 | 0 | 381 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 236-237 RUBIN DB REJECTION, REBUTTAL, REVISION - SOME FLEXIBLE FEATURES OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 608 | 0 | 0 | 382 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 237-238 SCARR S ANOSMIC PEER-REVIEW - A ROSE BY ANOTHER NAME IS EVIDENTLY NOT A ROSE | 3 | 10 |
| 609 | 0 | 3 | 383 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 241-241 WHITE MJ SOME PROCEDURAL OBSCURITIES IN PETERS AND CECIS PEER-REVIEW STUDY | 0 | 0 |
| 610 | 0 | 0 | 384 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 242-243 WILSON WA RESEARCH ON PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES - PROBLEMS OF INTERPRETATION, APPLICATION, AND PROPRIETY | 1 | 5 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 611 | 0 | 0 | 385 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 245-245 ZEAMAN D RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 612 | 1 | 8 | 386 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 246-252 PETERS DP; CECI SJ PEER-REVIEW RESEARCH - OBJECTIONS AND OBLIGATIONS | 6 | 10 |
| 613 | 1 | 12 | 541 1985 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 8 (4): 747-749 PETERS DP; CECI SJ PEER-REVIEW - BEAUTY IS IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER | 2 | 5 |
| 614 | 17 | 182 | 986 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 119-134 CICCHETTI DV THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY INVESTIGATION | 41 | 94 |
| 615 | 0 | 0 | 987 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 135-135 ADAMS KM PEER-REVIEW - AN UNFLATTERING PICTURE | 2 | 2 |
| 616 | 0 | 0 | 988 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 137-137 BAILAR JC RELIABILITY, FAIRNESS, OBJECTIVITY, AND OTHER INAPPROPRIATE GOALS IN PEER-REVIEW | 9 | 12 |
| 617 | 0 | 11 | 989 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 138-138 BORNSTEIN RF THE PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A NEGLECTED ISSUE | 3 | 8 |
| 618 | 1 | 9 | 990 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 140-140 COLE S CONSENSUS AND THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW EVALUATIONS | 0 | 0 |
| 619 | 1 | 8 | 991 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 141-141 COLMAN AM UNRELIABLE PEER-REVIEW - CAUSES AND CURES OF HUMAN MISERY | 0 | 3 |
| 620 | 0 | 0 | 992 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 144-144 DELCOMYN F PEER-REVIEW - EXPLICIT CRITERIA AND TRAINING CAN HELP | 1 | 3 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 621 | 0 | 0 | 993 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 147-147 FULLER S PEER-REVIEW IS NOT ENOUGH - EDITORS MUST WORK WITH LIBRARIANS TO ENSURE ACCESS TO RESEARCH | 0 | 0 |
| 622 | 0 | 9 | 994 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 149-149 GORMAN ME REPLICATION, RELIABILITY AND PEER-REVIEW - A CASE-STUDY | 0 | 0 |
| 623 | 1 | 1 | 995 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 149-149 GREENE R IS THERE AN ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 624 | 0 | 24 | 996 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 154-155 LAMING D WHY IS THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW SO LOW | 2 | 2 |
| 625 | 1 | 4 | 997 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 157-157 MAHONEY MJ JUSTICE, EFFICIENCY, AND EPISTEMOLOGY IN THE PEER-REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPTS | 1 | 2 |
| 626 | 1 | 3 | 998 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 157-157 MARSH HW; BALL S REFLECTIONS ON THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 4 | 4 |
| 627 | 1 | 4 | 999 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 158-158 NELSON LD THE PROCESS OF PEER-REVIEW - UNANSWERED QUESTIONS | 2 | 2 |
| 628 | 0 | 3 | 1000 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 159-159 ROEDIGER HL IS UNRELIABILITY IN PEER-REVIEW HARMFUL | 2 | 4 |
| 629 | 0 | 10 | 1001 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 160-160 ROSENTHAL R SOME INDEXES OF THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW | 2 | 4 |
| 630 | 0 | 2 | 1002 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 164-164 TYRER P CHAIRMANS ACTION - THE IMPORTANCE OF EXECUTIVE DECISIONS IN PEER-REVIEW | 2 | 2 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 631 | 0 | 1 | 1003 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 166-166 ZENTALL TR WHAT TO DO ABOUT PEER-REVIEW - IS THE CURE WORSE THAN THE DISEASE | 1 | 1 |
| 632 | 1 | 63 | 1004 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 167-186 CICCHETTI DV REFLECTIONS FROM THE PEER-REVIEW MIRROR | 8 | 12 |
| 633 | 1 | 4 | 1246 1993 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 16 (2): 398-399 CROTHERS C PEER-REVIEW RELIABILITY - THE HIERARCHY OF THE SCIENCES | 0 | 0 |
| 634 | 4 | 10 | 1247 1993 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 16 (2): 399-400 LUCE RD RELIABILITY IS NEITHER TO BE EXPECTED NOR DESIRED IN PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 635 | 4 | 8 | 1248 1993 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 16 (2): 401-403 CICCHETTI DV THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - ITS LIKE DEJA-VU ALL OVER AGAIN - AUTHORS RESPONSE | 2 | 3 |
| 636 | 0 | 0 | 1680 1996 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 19 (3): 533-534 Somit A; Peterson SA Journal response time: A case for multiple submission - Commentary | 0 | 0 |
| 637 | 5 | 13 | 1681 1996 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 19 (3): 534-& Cicchetti DV Peer review: Agreement and disagreement - Response | 0 | 1 |
| 638 | 0 | 82 | 3139 2004 BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES 66 (3): 333-348 Shimp CP Ambiguity, logic, simplicity, and dynamics: Wittgenstemian evaluative criteria in peer review of quantitative research on categorization | 1 | 1 |
| 639 | 0 | 26 | 3140 2004 BERLINER UND MUNCHENER TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT 117 (5-6): 182-187 Stark KDC Assessing risks in relation to international trade with food and animals: a review of methods currently applied | 0 | 2 |
| 640 | 0 | 65 | 1826 1997 BETRIEBSWIRTSCHAFTLICHE FORSCHUNG UND PRAXIS 49 (3): 266-291 LindgensStrache U Peer review - A proven method for assuring and improving the quality of audits in Germany? Some comments | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 641 | 0 | 0 | 1516 1995 BIO-TECHNOLOGY 13 (6): 618-618 GOODSTEIN D ETHICS AND PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 2 |
| 642 | 0 | 0 | 1682 1996 BIOCHEMICAL EDUCATION 24 (4): 210-211 Shaw DF Electronic publishing in science | 0 | 0 |
| 643 | 0 | 14 | 2964 2003 BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY EDUCATION 31 (2): 115-118 Hall ML; Guth CA; Kohler SJ; Wolfson AJ Advanced instrumentation projects for first-year biochemistry laboratory | 0 | 1 |
| 644 | 2 | 11 | 3347 2005 BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY EDUCATION 33 (4): 277-280 Tang BL; Gan YH Preparing the senior or graduating student for graduate research | 0 | 0 |
| 645 | 0 | 0 | 3348 2005 BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY EDUCATION 33 (5): 323-324 Cooper S The use of MERLOT in biochemistry and molecular biology education | 0 | 0 |
| 646 | 0 | 11 | 3561 2006 BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY EDUCATION 34 (1): 5-11 Rangachari PK Lost in translation? Deconstructing science in the news through an inquiry-based course | 0 | 0 |
| 647 | 0 | 4 | 1517 1995 BIOELECTROMAGNETICS 16 (1): 1-1 JUSTESEN DR AN EXERCISE IN OPEN PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 648 | 0 | 1 | 602 1986 BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY 21 (1): 1-2 YALOW RS PEER-REVIEW AND SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS | 3 | 4 |
| 649 | 0 | 6 | 321 1981 BIOSCIENCE 31 (6): 421-421 MOMENT GB RISK MONEY FOR RESEARCH AND THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM | 0 | 4 |
| 650 | 0 | 0 | 387 1982 BIOSCIENCE 32 (1): 10-12 BODDE T EVALUATION OF PEER-REVIEW DRAWS MIXED REACTIONS | 1 | 1 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 651 | 2 | 19 | 603 1986 BIOSCIENCE 36 (1): 18-& CHUBIN DE MUCH ADO ABOUT PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 1 |
| 652 | 0 | 2 | 604 1986 BIOSCIENCE 36 (9): 598-598 SPITLER AL PORK BARREL OR PEER-REVIEW - THE WAR IN CONGRESS CONTINUES | 0 | 0 |
| 653 | 5 | 18 | 605 1986 BIOSCIENCE 36 (9): 607-609 CRANDALL R PEER-REVIEW - IMPROVING EDITORIAL PROCEDURES | 0 | 13 |
| 654 | 1 | 29 | 1249 1993 BIOSCIENCE 43 (9): 624-627 MARTIN B PEER-REVIEW AND THE ORIGIN OF AIDS - A CASE-STUDY IN REJECTED IDEAS | 0 | 6 |
| 655 | 1 | 11 | 1518 1995 BIOSCIENCE 45 (8): 558-563 SCHWARTZ SM; SLATER DW; HEYDRICK FP; WOOLLETT GR AIBS NEWS - A REPORT OF THE AIBS PEER-REVIEW PROCESS FOR THE US-ARMY 1994 BREAST-CANCER INITIATIVE | 1 | 1 |
| 656 | 0 | 0 | 1827 1997 BIOSCIENCE 47 (11): 798-798 [Anon] AIBS News: AIBS organizes peer-review panels | 0 | 0 |
| 657 | 0 | 0 | 2197 1999 BIOSCIENCE 49 (7): 586-586 [Anon] AIBS scientific peer review services expand | 0 | 0 |
| 658 | 8 | 27 | 2741 2002 BIOSCIENCE 52 (9): 824-829 Liu JG; Pysarchik DT; Taylor WW Peer review in the classroom | 0 | 1 |
| 659 | 4 | 11 | 3141 2004 BIOSCIENCE 54 (3): 234-239 Cassey P; Blackburn TM Publication and rejection among successful ecologists | 1 | 2 |
| 660 | 0 | 0 | 3142 2004 BIOSCIENCE 54 (9): 816-816 Gropp RE OMB considers new federal peer review policy | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 661 | 0 | 0 | 3349 2005 BIOSCIENCE 55 (9): 734-734 Gropp RE Politics and peer review | 0 | 0 |
| 662 | 0 | 34 | 3350 2005 BIOSCIENCE 55 (10): 887-896 Peterson CH; Bishop MJ Assessing the environmental impacts of beach nourishment | 0 | 1 |
| 663 | 11 | 29 | 3562 2006 BIOSCIENCE 56 (4): 333-340 Neff BD; Olden JD Is peer review a game of chance? | 0 | 1 |
| 664 | 0 | 5 | 3351 2005 BIOSECURITY AND BIOTERRORISM-BIODEFENSE STRATEGY PRACTICE AND SCIENCE 3 (2): 85-86 [Anon] Scientists' letter challenges NIH's biodefense efforts | 0 | 0 |
| 665 | 0 | 0 | 1683 1996 BIOTECHNOLOGY LAW REPORT 15 (2): 229-232 Crimaldi K Trade secret law and confidentiality of peer review process for scientific papers: Trial date set for Cistron Biotech v Immunex Corp | 0 | 0 |
| 666 | 0 | 39 | 3143 2004 BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH PART A-CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR TERATOLOGY 70 (12): 902-911 Julien E; Willhite CC; Richard AM; DeSesso JM Challenges in constructing statistically based structure-activity relationship models for developmental toxicity | 0 | 1 |
| 667 | 0 | 1 | 3144 2004 BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY 111 (6): 515-516 Thornton J 'Free' peer-review publishing | 0 | 0 |
| 668 | 0 | 6 | 2539 2001 BLOOD CELLS MOLECULES AND DISEASES 27 (6): 1020-1027 Lichtman MA; Oakes D The productivity and impact of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Scholar Program: The apparent positive effect of peer review | 1 | 2 |
| 669 | 1 | 1 | 2742 2002 BLOOD CELLS MOLECULES AND DISEASES 28 (1): 91-91 Lichtman MA; Oakes D The productivity and impact of the leukemia & lymphoma society scholar program: The apparent positive effect of peer review (vol 27, pg 1020, 2001) | 0 | 0 |
| 670 | 3 | 5 | 2743 2002 BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2: Art. No. 8 Montgomery AA; Graham A; Evans PH; Fahey T Inter-rater agreement in the scoring of abstracts submitted to a primary care research conference | 1 | 5 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 671 | 6 | 35 | 3145 2004 BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 4: Art. No. 9 Hofer TP; Asch SM; Hayward RA; Rubenstein LV; Hogan MM; et al. Profiling quality of care: Is there a role for peer review? | 0 | 1 |
| 672 | 0 | 12 | 3563 2006 BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 6: Art. No. 107 Maynard C; Sun HL; Lowy E; Sales AE; Fihn SD The use of percutaneous coronary intervention in black and white veterans with acute myocardial infarction | 0 | 0 |
| 673 | 0 | 29 | 3564 2006 BMC IMMUNOLOGY 7 Huang J; Honda W CED: a conformational epitope database | 0 | 0 |
| 674 | 0 | 109 | 2540 2001 BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION 28 (8): 725-735 Vesole DH; Simic A; Lazarus HM Controversy in multiple myeloma transplants: tandem autotransplants and mini-allografts | 0 | 5 |
| 675 | 0 | 14 | 2744 2002 BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION 30 (11): 749-752 Ali MY; Oyama Y; Monreal J; Winter J; Tallman M; et al. Reassessing the definition of myeloid engraftment after autotransplantation: it is not necessary to see 0.5 X 10(9)/l neutrophils on 3 consecutive days to define myeloid recovery | 0 | 4 |
| 676 | 15 | 28 | 2362 2000 BRAIN 123: 1964-1969 Rothwell PM; Martyn CN Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience - Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? | 22 | 33 |
| 677 | 0 | 13 | 1519 1995 BRAIN INJURY 9 (4): 355-364 MOSELEY A; ROTEM W ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE PROVISION OF BRAIN INJURY SERVICES | 0 | 4 |
| 678 | 0 | 12 | 388 1982 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 152 (4): 137-139 PERKINS PC A PEER-REVIEW PROGRAM IN THE COMMUNITY DENTAL SERVICE | 0 | 1 |
| 679 | 0 | 0 | 1250 1993 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 174 (8): 299-299 KASPAR P STUDY-GROUP TO PEER-REVIEW GROUP - A CASE OF NATURAL EVOLUTION | 0 | 0 |
| 680 | 0 | 0 | 1365 1994 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 176 (1): 26-28 PENDLEBURY ME; ROTHWELL PS; WILES L THE PATHWAYS IN PRACTICE PROGRAM - AN INVESTIGATION INTO ITS POTENTIAL USE BY GENERAL DENTAL PRACTITIONERS | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 681 | 0 | 0 | 1828 1997 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 182 (4): 119-119 Grace M Does peer review stifle innovation? | 0 | 0 |
| 682 | 0 | 1 | 1829 1997 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 182 (9): 330-330 Walters H Peer review: Stifles innovation? | 0 | 0 |
| 683 | 0 | 3 | 1830 1997 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 182 (9): 331-331 Andlaw RJ Peer review | 0 | 0 |
| 684 | 0 | 11 | 1991 1998 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 184 (4): 178-182 Eaton KA; Fleming WG; Rich JL A report of an evaluation of the pilot peer review scheme for general dental practitioners working in the general dental services in England | 2 | 2 |
| 685 | 1 | 14 | 2363 2000 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 189 (8): 445-448 Bullock AD; Butterfield S; Belfield CR; Morris ZS; Ribbins PM; et al. A role for clinical audit and peer review in the identification of continuing professional development needs for general dental practitioners: a discussion | 0 | 1 |
| 686 | 0 | 7 | 2965 2003 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 194 (1): 47-51 Bullock A; Firmstone V; Fielding A; Frame J; Thomas D; et al. Participation of UK dentists in continuing professional development | 0 | 1 |
| 687 | 0 | 0 | 2966 2003 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 194 (7): 349-349 Grace K Can peer review survive? | 0 | 0 |
| 688 | 0 | 9 | 2967 2003 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 195 (7): 389-393 Ricketts DNJ; Scott BJJ; Ali A; Chadwick RG; Murray CA; et al. Peer review amongst restorative specialists on the quality of their communication with referring dental practitioners | 0 | 2 |
| 689 | 0 | 28 | 3146 2004 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 197 (7): 401-405 Watt R; McGlone P; Evans D; Boulton S; Jacobs J; et al. The prevalence and nature of recent self-reported changes in general dental practice in a sample of English general dental practitioners | 0 | 2 |
| 690 | 2 | 11 | 3565 2006 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 200 (10): 581-584 Maidment Y A comparison of the perceived effects on Scottish general dental practitioners of peer review and other continuing professional development | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 691 | 0 | 0 | 322 1981 BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA 53 (8): 783-784 SPENCE AA SCIENTIFIC WRITING AND PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 3 |
| 692 | 0 | 6 | 3352 2005 BRITISH JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE 62 (2): 77-80 Sinclair GJ Blood film review by biomedical scientists | 0 | 0 |
| 693 | 0 | 0 | 1005 1991 BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER 63 (2): 168-170 TWENTYMAN P; SELBY P THE PROCESS OF PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 3 |
| 694 | 2 | 12 | 1006 1991 BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER 64 (2): 315-320 HARRIS M; HARTLEY AL; BLAIR V; BIRCH JM; BANERJEE SS; et al. SARCOMAS IN NORTH-WEST ENGLAND .1. HISTOPATHOLOGICAL PEER-REVIEW | 2 | 29 |
| 695 | 3 | 28 | 1122 1992 BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER 66 (4): 685-691 HARTLEY AL; BLAIR V; HARRIS M; BIRCH JM; BANERJEE SS; et al. SARCOMAS IN NORTH-WEST ENGLAND .3. SURVIVAL | 0 | 7 |
| 696 | 0 | 13 | 3147 2004 BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER 91 (2): 248-253 Hunt J; Keeley VL; Cobb M; Ahmedzai SH A new quality assurance package for hospital palliative care teams: the Trent Hospice Audit Group model | 0 | 0 |
| 697 | 0 | 0 | 2745 2002 BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY 53 (1): 1-2 Lennard MS; Ratter JM; Begg EJ; Tucker GT The Journal moves online for submission and peer review | 0 | 0 |
| 698 | 0 | 0 | 1123 1992 BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES 40 (1): 57-68 WICKS S PEER-REVIEW AND QUALITY-CONTROL IN HIGHER-EDUCATION | 0 | 0 |
| 699 | 0 | 13 | 1684 1996 BRITISH JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING 22 (1): 25-27 Kishen M; Presho M Emergency contraception - A prescription for change | 0 | 7 |
| 700 | 0 | 0 | 1007 1991 BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE 41 (350): 380-381 JONES R; WILMOT J; FRY J THE GENERAL-PRACTICE RESEARCH CLUB | 0 | 2 |