| Ranked All-Publication list | Historiographs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
| View: Overview | Sorted by journal name. |
Page 4 of 38: [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ] 11 21 31
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 301 | 10 | 19 | 1506 1995 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 165 (3): 685-688 POLAK JF THE ROLE OF THE MANUSCRIPT REVIEWER IN THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 5 | 9 |
| 302 | 0 | 10 | 1661 1996 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 167 (5): 1141-1145 Pomerantz SM; Daly B; Krebs TL; NessAiver M; Kepes SY; et al. Quality assurance for abdominal CT: A rapid, computer-assisted technique | 0 | 1 |
| 303 | 0 | 2 | 1977 1998 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 170 (4): 1110-1111 Beall DP Importance of peer review immunity protection in resident evaluations | 0 | 0 |
| 304 | 0 | 5 | 2190 1999 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 172 (4): 893-896 Mehta A; Dreyer KJ; Montgomery M; Wittenberg J A World Wide Web Internet engine for collaborative entry and peer review of radiologic teaching files | 2 | 16 |
| 305 | 2 | 3 | 2191 1999 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 172 (6): 1474-1474 Krinsky G How to avoid "Unblinding" the peer review process | 1 | 1 |
| 306 | 0 | 36 | 2529 2001 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 177 (3): 535-541 Yankaskas BC; Schell MJ; Bird RE; Desrochers DA Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: A community-based study | 0 | 8 |
| 307 | 11 | 15 | 2720 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 179 (6): 1415-1417 Katz DS; Proto AV; Olmsted WW Incidence and nature of unblinding by authors: Our experience at two radiology journals with double-blinded peer review policies | 7 | 12 |
| 308 | 0 | 1 | 2948 2003 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 181 (3): 649-653 Berlin L Performance improvement and peer-review - Activities: Are they immune from legal discovery? | 0 | 0 |
| 309 | 2 | 4 | 2949 2003 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 181 (5): 1422-1422 Liebeskind DS The fallacy of double-blinded peer review | 0 | 0 |
| 310 | 1 | 2 | 2950 2003 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 181 (5): 1422-1423 Katz DS; Proto AV; Olmsted WW The fallacy of double-blinded peer review - Reply | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 311 | 10 | 18 | 3130 2004 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 183 (6): 1545-1550 Kliewer MA; DeLong DM; Freed K; Jenkins CB; Paulson EK; et al. Peer review at the American Journal of Roentgenology: How reviewer and manuscript characteristics affected editorial decisions on 196 major papers | 2 | 2 |
| 312 | 8 | 15 | 3332 2005 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 184 (6): 1731-1735 Kliewer MA; Freed KS; DeLong DM; Pickhardt PJ; Provenzale JM Reviewing the reviewers: Comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology | 0 | 0 |
| 313 | 0 | 3 | 3333 2005 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 185 (5): 1101-1101 Stanley RJ To peer review or not to peer review: That seems to be the question | 0 | 0 |
| 314 | 2 | 7 | 282 1980 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 139 (3): 348-351 WEINER JP; GIBSON G; MUNSTER AM USE OF PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTICS IN SURGICAL-PROCEDURES - PEER-REVIEW GUIDELINES AS A METHOD FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE | 0 | 7 |
| 315 | 0 | 0 | 1351 1994 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 168 (1): 1-1 WAITE VS; WALKER R MEDICAL AND SURGICAL PEER-REVIEW | 2 | 2 |
| 316 | 1 | 1 | 1352 1994 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 168 (4): 365-365 MOSS G TIME TO FIGHT PEER-REVIEW ABUSE | 0 | 0 |
| 317 | 0 | 0 | 1507 1995 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 169 (1): 187-187 BIRBIGLIA VP MEDICAL AND SURGICAL PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 318 | 3 | 20 | 1662 1996 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 171 (4): 441-444 Scher KS; ScottConner CEH Making peer review statistically accountable | 1 | 2 |
| 319 | 1 | 20 | 1663 1996 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 171 (6): 548-552 Silver A; Eichorn A; Kral J; Pickett G; Barie P; et al. Timeliness and use of antibiotic prophylaxis in selected inpatient surgical procedures | 0 | 44 |
| 320 | 0 | 3 | 1664 1996 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 172 (2): 222-224 Lee JT Making peer review statistically accountable | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 321 | 1 | 2 | 1665 1996 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 172 (2): 224-224 Scher KS Making peer review statistically accountable - Reply | 0 | 0 |
| 322 | 4 | 15 | 2530 2001 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 182 (2): 103-109 Livingston EH; Harwell JD Peer review | 0 | 1 |
| 323 | 0 | 6 | 2721 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 184 (1): 16-18 Allen JW; DeSimone KJ Valid peer review for surgeons working in small hospitals | 0 | 4 |
| 324 | 1 | 14 | 1108 1992 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY 16 (5): 476-482 RAMSAY AD; GALLAGHER PJ LOCAL AUDIT OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY - 18 MONTHS EXPERIENCE OF PEER-REVIEW BASED QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN AN ENGLISH TEACHING HOSPITAL | 4 | 48 |
| 325 | 5 | 19 | 1225 1993 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES 305 (4): 222-228 LEFEVRE F; FEINGLASS J; YARNOLD PR; MARTIN GJ; WEBSTER J USE OF THE RAND STRUCTURED IMPLICIT REVIEW INSTRUMENT FOR QUALITY OF CARE ASSESSMENT | 1 | 2 |
| 326 | 2 | 15 | 443 1983 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 38 (8): 941-947 RODRIGUEZ AR PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PSYCHIATRIC PEER-REVIEW AT CHAMPUS | 2 | 15 |
| 327 | 3 | 15 | 499 1984 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 39 (4): 406-414 THEAMAN M THE IMPACT OF PEER-REVIEW ON PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | 4 | 5 |
| 328 | 0 | 1 | 599 1986 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 41 (2): 218-218 SURWILLO WW ANONYMOUS REVIEWING AND THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 1 | 7 |
| 329 | 1 | 4 | 1109 1992 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 47 (12): 1679-1681 HOULIHAN D; HOFSCHULTE L; SACHAU D; PATTEN C CRITIQUING THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - EXAMINING A POTENTIAL DUAL ROLE-CONFLICT | 1 | 3 |
| 330 | 0 | 31 | 1226 1993 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 48 (1): 8-15 POYTHRESS N; OTTO RK; DARKES J; STARR L APAS EXPERT PANEL IN THE CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW OF THE USS-IOWA INCIDENT | 0 | 11 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 331 | 3 | 122 | 1227 1993 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 48 (9): 972-983 GARDNER W; WILCOX BL POLITICAL INTERVENTION IN SCIENTIFIC PEER-REVIEW - RESEARCH ON ADOLESCENT SEXUAL-BEHAVIOR | 0 | 20 |
| 332 | 0 | 1 | 1666 1996 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 51 (11): 1190-1191 Fine MA Reflections on enhancing accountability in the peer review process | 2 | 3 |
| 333 | 0 | 10 | 1978 1998 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 53 (12): 1292-1297 Halpern DF; Smothergill DW; Allen M; Baker S; Baum C; et al. Scholarship in psychology - A paradigm for the twenty-first century | 0 | 16 |
| 334 | 0 | 5 | 2722 2002 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 57 (3): 198-201 McCarty R Science, politics, and peer review - An editor's dilemma | 2 | 3 |
| 335 | 1 | 6 | 2723 2002 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 57 (3): 202-205 Newcombe NS Five commandments for APA | 0 | 1 |
| 336 | 0 | 3 | 2951 2003 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 58 (4): 285-288 Melia RP; Pledger C; Wilson R Disability and rehabilitation research - Opportunities for participation, collaboration, and extramural funding for psychologists | 0 | 5 |
| 337 | 0 | 0 | 85 1975 AMERICAN SCIENTIST 63 (6): 624-626 BOWERS R PEER REVIEW SYSTEM ON TRIAL | 2 | 4 |
| 338 | 0 | 3 | 147 1977 AMERICAN SCIENTIST 65 (1): 17-20 SYMINGTON JW; KRAMER TR DOES PEER REVIEW WORK | 1 | 3 |
| 339 | 0 | 1 | 148 1977 AMERICAN SCIENTIST 65 (3): 268-269 ROY R PEER REVIEW REVIEWED | 0 | 3 |
| 340 | 0 | 1 | 149 1977 AMERICAN SCIENTIST 65 (3): 269-270 WILSDORF D PEER REVIEW REVIEWED | 1 | 1 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 341 | 0 | 0 | 150 1977 AMERICAN SCIENTIST 65 (3): 270-271 SYMINGTON J PEER REVIEW REVIEWED - REPLY | 0 | 0 |
| 342 | 0 | 0 | 1508 1995 AMERICAN SCIENTIST 83 (5): 401-402 GOODSTEIN D PEER-REVIEW AFTER THE BIG CRUNCH | 3 | 7 |
| 343 | 0 | 0 | 2724 2002 AMERICAN SCIENTIST 90 (2): 106-106 Fox MA In praise of peer review | 0 | 0 |
| 344 | 0 | 10 | 730 1988 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW 53 (1): 157-160 HARGENS LL FURTHER EVIDENCE ON FIELD DIFFERENCES IN CONSENSUS FROM THE NSF PEER-REVIEW STUDIES - REPLY | 0 | 5 |
| 345 | 0 | 73 | 1979 1998 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW 63 (2): 200-224 Boyd EA Bureaucratic authority in the "company of equals": The interactional management of medical peer | 0 | 15 |
| 346 | 5 | 58 | 3131 2004 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW 69 (2): 190-212 Guetzkow J; Lamont M; Mallard G What is originality in the humanities and the social sciences? | 0 | 1 |
| 347 | 0 | 2 | 233 1979 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGIST 14 (4): 215-218 HILLER DV; DILLINGHAM HC IMPACT OF RIGHT-OF-ACCESS UPON PEER-REVIEW - EDITORIAL ESSAY | 0 | 0 |
| 348 | 0 | 0 | 234 1979 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGIST 14 (4): 219-219 FLACKS R IMPACT OF RIGHT-OF-ACCESS UPON PEER-REVIEW - COMMENT | 0 | 0 |
| 349 | 0 | 0 | 235 1979 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGIST 14 (4): 219-221 CORDERBOLZ J IMPACT OF RIGHT-OF-ACCESS UPON PEER-REVIEW - REPLY | 0 | 0 |
| 350 | 0 | 0 | 236 1979 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGIST 14 (4): 221-223 FASHING J RIGHT-OF-ACCESS AND PEER-REVIEW - COMMENT | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 351 | 0 | 0 | 237 1979 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGIST 14 (4): 223-224 INTONSPETERSON MJ IMPACT OF RIGHT-OF-ACCESS UPON PEER-REVIEW - COMMENT | 0 | 0 |
| 352 | 0 | 10 | 238 1979 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGIST 14 (4): 224-226 SCHWARTZ B IMPACT OF RIGHT-OF-ACCESS UPON PEER-REVIEW - COMMENT | 0 | 0 |
| 353 | 0 | 0 | 239 1979 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGIST 14 (4): 226-228 SCHWARTZ M IMPACT OF RIGHT-OF-ACCESS UPON PEER-REVIEW - COMMENT | 0 | 0 |
| 354 | 0 | 3 | 240 1979 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGIST 14 (4): 228-230 HILLER DV; DILLINGHAM HC IMPACT OF RIGHT-OF-ACCESS UPON PEER-REVIEW - REJOINDER | 0 | 0 |
| 355 | 0 | 3 | 283 1980 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGIST 15 (4): U186-& HUGHES HM PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 356 | 0 | 8 | 1228 1993 AMERICAN STATISTICIAN 47 (2): 99-101 DERR J BIOSTATISTICS CORES - IMPROVING THE CHANCES FOR FUNDING | 0 | 0 |
| 357 | 1 | 10 | 2952 2003 AMERICAN SURGEON 69 (3): 257-260 Shanti CM; Tyburski JG; Rishell KB; Wilson RF; Lozen Y; et al. Correlation of Revised Trauma Score and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) predicted probability of survival with peer-reviewed determination of trauma deaths | 1 | 3 |
| 358 | 0 | 14 | 1229 1993 ANAESTHESIA 48 (1): 3-7 SHORT TG; OREGAN A; LEW J; OH TE CRITICAL INCIDENT REPORTING IN AN ANESTHETIC DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM | 0 | 21 |
| 359 | 1 | 4 | 2953 2003 ANAESTHESIA 58 (6): 543-548 Crean PM; Stokes MA; Williamson C; Hatch DJ Quality in paediatric anaesthesia: a pilot study of interdepartmental peer review | 0 | 0 |
| 360 | 0 | 0 | 361 1982 ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE 10 (1): 70-70 BROWN TCK PEER-REVIEW IN ANESTHESIA | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 361 | 0 | 0 | 362 1982 ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE 10 (2): 107-107 BROWN TCK PEER-REVIEW IN ANESTHESIA | 0 | 1 |
| 362 | 0 | 14 | 1110 1992 ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY 14 (5): 407-414 COWAN DF IMPLEMENTING A REGULATION-COMPLIANT QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ON A COMMERCIAL LABORATORY INFORMATION-SYSTEM | 0 | 6 |
| 363 | 0 | 0 | 86 1975 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 47 (12): 1881-1881 LAITINEN HA PEER REVIEW SYSTEM | 0 | 0 |
| 364 | 0 | 1 | 115 1976 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 48 (11): A875-A875 PETRUZZI JM PEER REVIEW IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY | 0 | 3 |
| 365 | 0 | 0 | 151 1977 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 49 (1): 1-1 LAITINEN HA PEER REVIEW - SHOULD AUTHOR BE ANONYMOUS | 0 | 0 |
| 366 | 0 | 1 | 152 1977 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 49 (11): A945-& HUSOVSKY AA NSF PEER REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 367 | 0 | 0 | 539 1985 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 57 (8): A868-& PETRUZZI JM PEER-REVIEW IN ANALYTICAL-CHEMISTRY | 0 | 0 |
| 368 | 2 | 5 | 1980 1998 ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA 86 (2S) Levine RD; Sugarman M; Schiller W; Weinshel S; Lehning E; et al. Discussion improves interrater reliability in structured peer review | 0 | 0 |
| 369 | 1 | 18 | 2343 2000 ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA 90 (2): 344-350 Katz RI; Lagasse RS Factors influencing the reporting of adverse perioperative outcomes to a quality management program | 1 | 13 |
| 370 | 6 | 15 | 3548 2006 ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA 102 (5): 1501-1503 Cohen IT; Patel K Peer review interrater concordance of scientific abstracts: A study of anesthesiology subspecialty and component societies | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 371 | 0 | 5 | 1353 1994 ANESTHESIOLOGY 80 (3): 491-492 SAIDMAN LJ UNRESOLVED ISSUES RELATING TO PEER-REVIEW, INDUSTRY SUPPORT OF RESEARCH, AND CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST | 0 | 17 |
| 372 | 3 | 27 | 1509 1995 ANESTHESIOLOGY 82 (5): 1181-1188 LAGASSE RS; STEINBERG ES; KATZ RI; SAUBERMANN AJ DEFINING QUALITY OF PERIOPERATIVE CARE BY STATISTICAL PROCESS-CONTROL OF ADVERSE OUTCOMES | 5 | 43 |
| 373 | 4 | 38 | 1667 1996 ANESTHESIOLOGY 85 (5): 1049-1054 Posner KL; Caplan RA; Cheney FW Variation in expert opinion in medical malpractice review | 1 | 15 |
| 374 | 7 | 22 | 1981 1998 ANESTHESIOLOGY 89 (2): 507-515 Levine RD; Sugarman M; Schiller W; Weinshel S; Lehning EJ; et al. The effect of group discussion on interrater reliability of structured peer review | 2 | 5 |
| 375 | 0 | 3 | 2344 2000 ANESTHESIOLOGY 92 (5): 1495-1495 Gage J The purpose of peer review | 0 | 0 |
| 376 | 0 | 12 | 2345 2000 ANESTHESIOLOGY 92 (5): 1496-1497 Liang BA; Cullen DJ The purpose of peer review - Reply | 0 | 0 |
| 377 | 4 | 13 | 2346 2000 ANESTHESIOLOGY 92 (5): 1497-1498 Lagasse RS The purpose of peer review - Reply | 0 | 0 |
| 378 | 0 | 14 | 2725 2002 ANESTHESIOLOGY 97 (1): 1-3 Warltier DC; Kersten JR; Pagel PS; Gross GJ Anesthetic preconditioning: Serendipity and science | 0 | 11 |
| 379 | 0 | 27 | 1230 1993 ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION IN ENGLISH 32 (2): 234-238 DANIEL HD AN EVALUATION OF THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS AT ANGEWANDTE-CHEMIE | 6 | 8 |
| 380 | 3 | 5 | 1231 1993 ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION IN ENGLISH 32 (7): 1030-1030 ROSS PF CONCERNING AN EVALUATION OF THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS AT ANGEWANDTE-CHEMIE | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 381 | 1 | 5 | 1232 1993 ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION IN ENGLISH 32 (7): 1030-1031 DANIEL HD CONCERNING AN EVALUATION OF THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS AT ANGEWANDTE-CHEMIE - REPLY | 0 | 0 |
| 382 | 3 | 64 | 3334 2005 ANNALES DE PATHOLOGIE 25 (2): 149-171 Hassoun J; Bataillard A; Voigt JJ; Coindre JM; Anger E; et al. Standards, Options and Recommendations 2004: good practice guidelines for second opinion in anatomic and surgical pathology in oncology (integral report) | 0 | 0 |
| 383 | 2 | 38 | 1668 1996 ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION 15 (1): 57-70 Kupperwasser B Quality assessment in anaesthesia | 0 | 6 |
| 384 | 0 | 22 | 2954 2003 ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE 32 (6): 756-763 Chin JJ; Sahadevan S Neurofibrillary and ethico-legal tangles: In search of surrogates for dementia patients lacking decision-making capacity and relatives | 0 | 1 |
| 385 | 0 | 5 | 3335 2005 ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE 34 (4): 281-284 Bailey BJ Publication in otology and neuro-otology: Dos and don'ts | 0 | 0 |
| 386 | 0 | 0 | 799 1989 ANNALS OF ALLERGY 63 (2): 85-85 SLY RM CONTRIBUTION OF PEER-REVIEW TO SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS | 0 | 0 |
| 387 | 4 | 10 | 889 1990 ANNALS OF ALLERGY 65 (4): 243-243 SLY RM BLINDING REVIEWERS IMPROVES PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 2 |
| 388 | 0 | 106 | 2531 2001 ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY SCIENCE 31 (1): 108-118 Mintz PD; Mayers L; Avery N; Flanagan HL; Burks SG; et al. Review: Fibrin sealant: Clinical use and the development of the University of Virginia Tissue Adhesive Center | 0 | 4 |
| 389 | 0 | 2 | 2192 1999 ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY 36: 316-322 Challand GS Assessing the quality of comments on reports: a retrospective study | 1 | 10 |
| 390 | 1 | 5 | 2347 2000 ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY 37: 758-763 Marshall WJ; Challand GS Provision of interpretative comments on biochemical report forms | 0 | 12 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 391 | 0 | 12 | 3336 2005 ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY 42: 351-356 Thomas MA; Singh GK; Williams EJ; McDowell IFW; Tovey JA; et al. A review of troponin assay performance in Wales: can the same (method-dependent) decision limits be used in different sites? | 0 | 1 |
| 392 | 0 | 0 | 444 1983 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 12 (1): 57-57 KROME RL PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 393 | 0 | 0 | 731 1988 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 17 (4): 371-372 KNOPP RK MEDICAL-RESEARCH AND EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - A CRISIS OF CONFIDENCE | 2 | 2 |
| 394 | 1 | 2 | 1669 1996 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 28 (1): 75-77 Waeckerle JF; Callaham ML Medical journals and the science of peer review: Raising the standard | 2 | 2 |
| 395 | 0 | 1 | 1670 1996 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 28 (2): 247-247 Callaham Medical journals and the science of peer review: Raising the standard (vol 28, pg 75, 1996) | 0 | 0 |
| 396 | 0 | 12 | 1814 1997 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 30 (6): 782-784 Fontanarosa PB Scientific publication in emergency medicine: Imprint on the future | 0 | 2 |
| 397 | 3 | 13 | 1982 1998 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 32 (3): 318-322 Callaham ML; Wears RL; Waeckerle JF Effect of attendance at a training session on peer reviewer quality and performance | 7 | 8 |
| 398 | 0 | 27 | 2193 1999 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 34 (4): 429-437 Graff L; Orledge J; Radford MJ; Wang Y; Petrillo M; et al. Correlation of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research congestive heart failure admission guideline with mortality: Peer Review Organization Voluntary Hospital Association Initiative to Decrease Events (PROVIDE) for congestive heart failure | 0 | 10 |
| 399 | 1 | 33 | 2532 2001 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 37 (1): 75-87 Schriger DL; Cooper RJ Achieving graphical excellence: Suggestions and methods for creating high-quality visual displays of experimental data | 0 | 10 |
| 400 | 9 | 23 | 2726 2002 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 40 (3): 313-316 Callaham ML Research into peer review and scientific publication: Journals look in the mirror | 0 | 0 |