| Ranked All-Publication list | Historiographs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
| View: Overview | Sorted by journal name. |
Page 13 of 38: 1 [ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ] 21 31
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1201 | 0 | 16 | 2384 2000 ENVIRONMENTAL FORENSICS 1 (4): 197-203 Brilis GM; Worthington JC; Wait AD Quality science in the courtroom: US EPA data quality and peer review policies and procedures compared to the Daubert factors | 0 | 3 |
| 1202 | 0 | 7 | 1019 1991 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 96: 53-56 DEARFIELD KL; QUEST JA; WHITING RJ; STACK HF; WATERS MD CHARACTERISTICS OF THE UNITED-STATES EPAS OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS TOXICITY INFORMATION DATABASES | 0 | 4 |
| 1203 | 0 | 76 | 2019 1998 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 106: 369-378 De Rosa CT; Pohl HR; Williams M; Ademoyero AA; Chou CHSJ; et al. Public health implications of environmental exposures | 0 | 9 |
| 1204 | 0 | 2 | 2385 2000 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 108: 949-951 Barker LF; Rau EH; Pfister EA; Calcagni J Development of a pollution prevention and energy efficiency clearinghouse for biomedical research facilities | 0 | 1 |
| 1205 | 0 | 42 | 2563 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 109: 633-637 Rubin C; McGeehin MA; Holmes AK; Backer L; Burreson G; et al. Emerging areas of research reported during the CDC National Conference on Pfiesteria: From biology to public health | 0 | 3 |
| 1206 | 0 | 14 | 2998 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 111 (12): 1550-1558 Kanno J; Onyon L; Peddada S; Ashby J; Jacob E; et al. The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay. Phase 2: Coded single-dose studies | 1 | 26 |
| 1207 | 0 | 0 | 3581 2006 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 114 (5): A270-A270 Schwartz DA; Mastin JP; Martin M Improving grant application peer review for the NIEHS | 0 | 0 |
| 1208 | 0 | 19 | 3582 2006 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 114 (8): 1276-1282 Harding AK; Daston GP; Boyd GR; Lucier GW; Safe SH; et al. Endocrine disrupting chemicals research program of the US Environmental Protection Agency: Summary of a peer-review report | 0 | 0 |
| 1209 | 0 | 58 | 2999 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 32 (2): 252-267 Ducros CMJ; Joyce CB Field-based evaluation tool for riparian buffer zones in agricultural catchments | 0 | 1 |
| 1210 | 0 | 19 | 3176 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE 19 (12): 1065-1076 Gimond M Description and verification of an aquatic optics Monte Carlo model | 0 | 1 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1211 | 0 | 0 | 1272 1993 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT 26 (2-3): 203-218 MACDONALD LH; SMART A BEYOND THE GUIDELINES - PRACTICAL LESSONS FOR MONITORING | 0 | 8 |
| 1212 | 0 | 0 | 1380 1994 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT 30 (3): 247-274 BENNETT JP; ANDERSON RL; MIELKE ML; EBERSOLE JJ FOLIAR INJURY AIR-POLLUTION SURVEYS OF EASTERN WHITE-PINE (PINUS-STROBUS L) - A REVIEW | 0 | 8 |
| 1213 | 0 | 0 | 1539 1995 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT 36 (1): 1-25 STOHLGREN TJ; BINKLEY D; VEBLEN TT; BAKER WL ATTRIBUTES OF RELIABLE LONG-TERM LANDSCAPE-SCALE STUDIES - MALPRACTICE INSURANCE FOR LANDSCAPE ECOLOGISTS | 0 | 11 |
| 1214 | 0 | 14 | 2020 1998 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT 51 (1-2): 23-28 Fisher WS Development and validation of ecological indicators: An ORD approach | 0 | 4 |
| 1215 | 0 | 8 | 2021 1998 ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION 102: 635-639 Cocks AT; Rodgers IR; Skeffington RA; Webb AH The limitations of integrated assessment modelling in developing air pollution control policies | 0 | 1 |
| 1216 | 0 | 87 | 3177 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY 7 (4): 239-251 van Kooten GC; Eagle AJ; Manley J; Smolak T How costly are carbon offsets? A meta-analysis of carbon forest sinks | 0 | 5 |
| 1217 | 0 | 54 | 3178 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY 7 (5): 357-368 Harrison C Peer review, politics and pluralism | 0 | 4 |
| 1218 | 0 | 0 | 3386 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY 8 (2): 191-193 Dougherty PJ Comment on "Peer review, politics and pluralism" by Chris Harrison, Environmental Science and Policy 7, 357-368 | 0 | 0 |
| 1219 | 0 | 0 | 507 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 18 (12): A353-A353 FLEMING JL PEER-REVIEW - A MATTER OF EXPECTATIONS | 0 | 0 |
| 1220 | 0 | 1 | 741 1988 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 22 (3): 235-235 GLAZE WH PEER-REVIEW - A FOUNDATION OF SCIENCE | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1221 | 0 | 0 | 742 1988 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 22 (12): 1371-1371 GLAZE WH PEER-REVIEW EXPERTISE | 0 | 0 |
| 1222 | 0 | 0 | 1707 1996 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 30 (4): A145-A145 Glaze WH We need solid peer review | 0 | 0 |
| 1223 | 0 | 0 | 1708 1996 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 30 (8): A327-A328 [Anon] ORD to establish peer review advisory panel | 0 | 0 |
| 1224 | 0 | 0 | 1709 1996 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 30 (12): A522-A522 [Anon] Agency peer review ''uneven,'' says GAO | 0 | 0 |
| 1225 | 0 | 0 | 2022 1998 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 32 (9): 215A-215A [Anon] Guidance should increase peer review of agency work | 0 | 0 |
| 1226 | 0 | 0 | 3179 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 38 (14): 263A-264A Cooney CM National peer review guidelines move forward | 0 | 0 |
| 1227 | 1 | 15 | 2564 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH : 56-61 Collazo YT; Taboas AL; Moghissi AA An independent peer review process for environmental technology | 0 | 0 |
| 1228 | 0 | 4 | 668 1987 ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY 6 (7): 491-493 YOSIE TF; KURTZ JC PEER-REVIEW PROCESSES USED IN REGULATORY DECISION-MAKING | 0 | 0 |
| 1229 | 0 | 7 | 1710 1996 EPIDEMIOLOGY 7 (6): 651-652 Byers T Peer review for media coverage: Getting the story right | 0 | 3 |
| 1230 | 0 | 2 | 1861 1997 EQUINE VETERINARY JOURNAL 29 (1): 5-5 Rossdale PD Volume 28: Continuing progress, peer review and clinical content | 0 | 2 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1231 | 0 | 0 | 1540 1995 ESA BULLETIN-EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY (84): 73-79 Kessler MF Using ISO | 0 | 0 |
| 1232 | 0 | 18 | 2226 1999 ETHICS & BEHAVIOR 9 (1): 39-50 Crook LS; Dean MC "Lost in a shopping mall" - A breach of professional ethics | 0 | 4 |
| 1233 | 0 | 0 | 1273 1993 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY 10: 16-18 RUNCIMAN WB COMMENTARY ON EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS | 0 | 1 |
| 1234 | 0 | 27 | 1862 1997 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER 33 (11): 1767-1773 Thurlimann B; Paridaens R; Serin D; Bonneterre J; Roche H; et al. Third-line hormonal treatment with exemestane in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer progressing on aminoglutethimide: a phase II multicentre multinational study | 0 | 75 |
| 1235 | 0 | 11 | 1541 1995 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION 4 (2): 153-157 BUNTINX F; KNOTTNERUS JA; ESSED GGM; CREBOLDER HFJM LONG-TERM EFFECT OF FEEDBACK AND PEER COMPARISON ON THE SAMPLING QUALITY OF CERVICAL SMEARS - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL | 0 | 2 |
| 1236 | 0 | 22 | 3180 2004 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY 151 (1): 67-72 Thomas M; Massa G; Craen M; de Zegher F; Bourguignon JP; et al. Prevalence and demographic features of childhood growth hormone deficiency in Belgium during the period 1986-2001 | 0 | 2 |
| 1237 | 0 | 56 | 2227 1999 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY 15 (9): 847-852 Alexander FE Clusters and clustering of childhood cancer: A review | 0 | 4 |
| 1238 | 0 | 0 | 3583 2006 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING 33 (3): 235-236 Carrio I On cloning research, peer review and the possibility of fraud | 0 | 0 |
| 1239 | 0 | 17 | 1274 1993 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY 48 (1): 9-14 WAREHAM V; BAIN C; CRUICKSHANK D CESAREAN-SECTION AUDIT BY PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 4 |
| 1240 | 0 | 6 | 1275 1993 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY 51 (2): 85-90 ELFERINKSTINKENS PM; VANHEMEL OJS; HERMANS MPM OBSTETRIC CHARACTERISTICS PROFILES AS QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF OBSTETRIC CARE | 4 | 6 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1241 | 1 | 33 | 1381 1994 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY 53 (3): 165-173 ELFERINKSTINKENS PM; VANHEMEL OJS; BRAND R DIFFERENCES IN OBSTETRICAL INTERVENTION RATES BETWEEN DUTCH HOSPITALS | 2 | 4 |
| 1242 | 2 | 15 | 1382 1994 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY 56 (1): 1-7 VANHEMEL OJS; ELFERINKSTINKENS PM; BRAND R HOW TO COMPARE AND REPORT DEPARTMENT SPECIFIC MORTALITY-RATES FOR PEER-REVIEW USING THE PERINATAL DATABASE OF THE NETHERLANDS | 2 | 7 |
| 1243 | 0 | 14 | 1542 1995 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY 59 (2): 159-167 ELFERINKSTINKENS PM; BRAND R; VANHEMEL OJS TRENDS IN CESAREAN-SECTION RATES AMONG HIGH-RISK AND MEDIUM-RISK PREGNANCIES IN THE NETHERLANDS 1983-1992 | 1 | 6 |
| 1244 | 5 | 20 | 1711 1996 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY 68 (1-2): 97-103 ElferinkStinkens PM; Brand R; leCessie S; VanHemel OJS Large differences in obstetrical intervention rates among Dutch hospitals, even after adjustment for population differences | 2 | 12 |
| 1245 | 1 | 2 | 2782 2002 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY 102 (1): 4-5 Elferink-Stinkens PM; Merkus JMWM The obstetric peer review system in The Netherlands | 0 | 0 |
| 1246 | 4 | 15 | 2783 2002 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY 102 (1): 21-30 Elferink-Stinkens PM; Brand R; Amelink-Verburg MP; Merkus JMWM; den Ouden AL; et al. Randomised clinical trial on the effect of the Dutch obstetric peer review system | 0 | 0 |
| 1247 | 0 | 19 | 2023 1998 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS 20 (5): 569-578 Stephens C; Mackin N The validation of an orthodontic expert system rule-base for fixed appliance treatment planning | 0 | 3 |
| 1248 | 0 | 5 | 1712 1996 EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY 6 (2): S16-S18 Laniado M How to present research data consistently in a scientific paper | 0 | 1 |
| 1249 | 2 | 11 | 2228 1999 EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY 9 (2): 371-378 Sigal R; Caramella D; Kurdziel JC; Gandon Y; Lemort M; et al. EURORAD, the EAR database project | 0 | 4 |
| 1250 | 0 | 24 | 1863 1997 EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL 10 (7): 1530-1534 Guest JF; Morris A Community-acquired pneumonia: The annual cost to the national health service in the UK | 0 | 65 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1251 | 5 | 67 | 1383 1994 EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 17 (1): 3-21 GOLDMAN RL THE RELIABILITY OF PEER ASSESSMENTS - A METAANALYSIS | 8 | 12 |
| 1252 | 1 | 1 | 2024 1998 EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 21 (4): 413-418 Weinmann C Quality improvement in health care - A brief history of the Medicare Peer Review Organization (PRO) initiative | 3 | 3 |
| 1253 | 2 | 8 | 2025 1998 EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 21 (4): 419-428 Fitzgerald ME; Molinari GF; Bausell RB The empowering potential of quality improvement data | 1 | 2 |
| 1254 | 1 | 21 | 2026 1998 EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 21 (4): 429-441 Lewis JN; Rising W Improving appropriate selection of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer | 2 | 3 |
| 1255 | 2 | 22 | 2027 1998 EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 21 (4): 461-471 Caldwell GG; Berg P; Pritchard C; Lewis JN Quality improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure by participating Indiana and Kentucky hospitals | 0 | 2 |
| 1256 | 0 | 18 | 2028 1998 EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 21 (4): 502-513 Preston JA; Grady JN; Schulz AF; Petrillo MK; Scinto JD The impact of a physician intervention program on older women's mammography use | 0 | 0 |
| 1257 | 2 | 24 | 2784 2002 EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 25 (1): 116-129 Shea B; Moher D; Graham I; Pham B; Tugwell P A comparison of the quality of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in paper-based journals | 0 | 12 |
| 1258 | 4 | 24 | 902 1990 EVALUATION REVIEW 14 (2): 151-165 LESLIE LZ PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES OF MASS-COMMUNICATION SCHOLARLY JOURNALS | 2 | 3 |
| 1259 | 1 | 31 | 1384 1994 EVALUATION REVIEW 18 (1): 20-30 CHUBIN DE GRANTS PEER-REVIEW IN THEORY AND PRACTICE | 2 | 5 |
| 1260 | 0 | 17 | 1385 1994 EVALUATION REVIEW 18 (1): 31-40 KOSTOFF RN ASSESSING RESEARCH IMPACT - FEDERAL PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES | 0 | 3 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1261 | 0 | 57 | 1020 1991 EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS 3 (1): 51-66 SEN A; WALLACE WA AN EXPERT SYSTEMS ASSISTANCE TO INTERNAL AUDIT DEPARTMENT EVALUATION | 0 | 0 |
| 1262 | 0 | 13 | 2565 2001 EXTRAGALACTIC INFRARED BACKGROUND AND ITS COSMOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS (204): 467-474 Stockman HS; Mather JC The Next Generation Space Telescope | 0 | 0 |
| 1263 | 0 | 1 | 119 1976 EYE EAR NOSE AND THROAT MONTHLY 55 (2): 45-45 SMITH TW PEER REVIEW OF COSMETIC SURGEONS | 0 | 0 |
| 1264 | 0 | 4 | 2386 2000 FAMILY MEDICINE 32 (10): 709-719 Reznich CB; Mavis BE Pilot test of family medicine faculty development fellowship accreditation guidelines | 0 | 1 |
| 1265 | 0 | 2 | 2785 2002 FAMILY MEDICINE 34 (2): 138-139 Neale AV What authors need to know about the way editors think: Report from the congress on peer review in biomedical publication | 0 | 0 |
| 1266 | 1 | 12 | 2786 2002 FAMILY MEDICINE 34 (10): 738-743 Wendling A; Hoekstra L Interactive peer review: An innovative resident evaluation tool | 0 | 1 |
| 1267 | 0 | 0 | 552 1985 FAMILY PRACTICE 2 (4): 219-224 GROL R; VANEIJK J; MESKER P; SCHELLEVIS F AUDIT - A PROJECT ON PEER-REVIEW IN GENERAL-PRACTICE | 2 | 5 |
| 1268 | 0 | 0 | 1146 1992 FAMILY PRACTICE 9 (4): 461-465 WYATT TD; REILLY PM; MORROW NC; PASSMORE CM SHORT-LIVED EFFECTS OF A FORMULARY ON ANTIINFECTIVE PRESCRIBING - THE NEED FOR CONTINUING PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 10 |
| 1269 | 0 | 0 | 1386 1994 FAMILY PRACTICE 11 (3): 325-329 FARDY HJ; JEFFS D FOCUS GROUPS - A METHOD FOR DEVELOPING CONSENSUS GUIDELINES IN GENERAL-PRACTICE | 0 | 10 |
| 1270 | 0 | 0 | 1543 1995 FAMILY PRACTICE 12 (1): 3-4 JONES R PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 6 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1271 | 0 | 0 | 1544 1995 FAMILY PRACTICE 12 (3): 309-312 TABENKIN H; STEINMETZ D; EILAT Z; HEMAN N; DAGAN B; et al. A PEER-REVIEW PROGRAM TO AUDIT THE MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS IN FAMILY PRACTICES IN ISRAEL | 0 | 1 |
| 1272 | 0 | 19 | 2566 2001 FAMILY PRACTICE 18 (5): 528-533 Langerlov P; Hjortdahl P; Saxegaard L; Andrew M; Matheson I Structuring prescribing data into traffic-light categories; a tool for evaluating treatment quality in primary care | 0 | 0 |
| 1273 | 0 | 18 | 2787 2002 FAMILY PRACTICE 19 (6): 611-616 Dempsey OP; Bekker HL 'Heads you win, tails I lose': a critical incident study of GPs' decisions about emergency admission referrals | 0 | 1 |
| 1274 | 2 | 24 | 3000 2003 FAMILY PRACTICE 20 (4): 443-451 Beyer M; Gerlach FM; Flies U; Grol R; Krol Z; et al. The development of quality circles/peer review groups as a method of quality improvement in Europe. Results of a survey in 26 European countries | 2 | 4 |
| 1275 | 0 | 35 | 2788 2002 FAMILY RELATIONS 51 (2): 138-147 Bailey SJ; Deen MY Development of a web-based evaluation system: A tool for measuring life skills in youth and family programs | 0 | 0 |
| 1276 | 0 | 0 | 815 1989 FASEB JOURNAL 3 (8): 1987-1992 GREEN JG; CALHOUN F; NIERZWICKI L; BRACKETT J; MEIER P RATING INTERVALS - AN EXPERIMENT IN PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 9 |
| 1277 | 0 | 1 | 1021 1991 FASEB JOURNAL 5 (1): 116-116 RAUB WF AGE-DISCRIMINATION IN NIH PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1278 | 2 | 10 | 1022 1991 FASEB JOURNAL 5 (9): 2313-2314 FORSDYKE DR BICAMERAL GRANT REVIEW - AN ALTERNATIVE TO CONVENTIONAL PEER-REVIEW | 4 | 4 |
| 1279 | 1 | 1 | 1147 1992 FASEB JOURNAL 6 (7): 2384-2385 KHAN MA; WORTHAM JW; WATZMAN N; GREEN JG THE NATIONAL-INSTITUTES-OF-HEALTH IS GOING HIGH-TECH IN PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1280 | 4 | 19 | 1276 1993 FASEB JOURNAL 7 (8): 619-621 FORSDYKE DR ON GIRAFFES AND PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 7 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1281 | 0 | 3 | 1277 1993 FASEB JOURNAL 7 (14): 1312-1319 VENER KJ; FEUER EJ; GORELIC L A STATISTICAL-MODEL VALIDATING TRIAGE FOR THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - KEEPING THE COMPETITIVE APPLICATIONS IN THE REVIEW PIPELINE | 2 | 4 |
| 1282 | 2 | 11 | 1387 1994 FASEB JOURNAL 8 (10): 679-683 MUSACCHIO JM AMERICAN SCIENCE IN CRISIS - THE NEED TO REVISE THE NIH FUNDING POLICY | 0 | 3 |
| 1283 | 0 | 1 | 1545 1995 FASEB JOURNAL 9 (13): 1381-1381 JUKES TH PEER-REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPTS | 0 | 0 |
| 1284 | 0 | 0 | 1713 1996 FASEB JOURNAL 10 (14): 1563-1568 Baldwin W; McCardle P Peer review at NIH in the 21st century | 0 | 0 |
| 1285 | 0 | 0 | 2029 1998 FASEB JOURNAL 12 (8): A1311-A1311 Schachman HK Peer review 101: How an NIH study section operates. | 0 | 0 |
| 1286 | 0 | 0 | 2387 2000 FASEB JOURNAL 14 (4): A311-A311 Tanaka H; Seals DR Manuscript peer review: A helpful checklist for students and novice referees. | 0 | 0 |
| 1287 | 0 | 0 | 2789 2002 FASEB JOURNAL 16 (5): A754-A754 Pelaez NJ Problem-based writing with peer review reveals generalized learning problems and improves academic performance in physiology | 0 | 0 |
| 1288 | 0 | 19 | 3181 2004 FASEB JOURNAL 18 (13): 1481-1486 Zucker S; Crabbe JC; Cooper G; Finkelman F; Largman C; et al. Veterans Administration support for medical research: opinions of the endangered species of physician-scientists | 0 | 0 |
| 1289 | 0 | 0 | 1 1969 FDA PAPERS 3 (9): 4-& HAMPSHIR.GD NAS-NRC DRUG EFFICACY STUDY - PEER REVIEW | 0 | 1 |
| 1290 | 0 | 0 | 32 1973 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 32 (8): 1827-1827 LEPOW IH CRISIS OF PEER REVIEW SYSTEM | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1291 | 0 | 5 | 162 1977 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 36 (8): 2066-2068 HENLEY C PEER REVIEW OF RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATIONS AT NATIONAL-INSTITUTES-OF-HEALTH .1. ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL PROCESSES | 4 | 12 |
| 1292 | 0 | 1 | 163 1977 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 36 (9): 2186-2190 HENLEY C PEER REVIEW OF RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATIONS AT NATIONAL-INSTITUTES-OF-HEALTH .2. REVIEW BY AN INITIAL REVIEW GROUP | 4 | 12 |
| 1293 | 0 | 0 | 164 1977 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 36 (10): 2335-2338 HENLEY C PEER REVIEW OF RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATIONS AT NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH 3 REVIEW BY AN ADVISORY BOARD-COUNCIL | 4 | 11 |
| 1294 | 0 | 0 | 247 1979 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 38 (13): 2649-2650 APIRION D RESEARCH FUNDING AND THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM | 6 | 9 |
| 1295 | 1 | 1 | 292 1980 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 39 (7): 2349-2349 RUTMAN RJ THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM | 0 | 0 |
| 1296 | 0 | 0 | 293 1980 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 39 (7): 2349-2349 VOGEL FS THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM - COMMENT | 0 | 0 |
| 1297 | 0 | 1 | 294 1980 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 39 (7): 2349-2350 HOMBURGER F THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM | 0 | 0 |
| 1298 | 0 | 1 | 295 1980 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 39 (7): 2350-2351 PAQUE RE THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM | 0 | 0 |
| 1299 | 0 | 0 | 296 1980 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 39 (7): 2351-2351 APIRION D THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM - REPLY | 0 | 0 |
| 1300 | 0 | 26 | 2790 2002 FERTILITY AND STERILITY 77 (4): S89-S93 Rosen RC Assessment of female sexual dysfunction: review of validated methods | 0 | 10 |