Ranked All-Publication list HistoriographsGlossary  HistCite Guide  About
Mon Sep 25 15:45:36 2006

Papers found on Topic Search: "Peer Review"
Nodes: 3720, Authors: 6708, Journals: 1228, Cited References: 45083, Words: 5405, Tags: 1
Yearly outputDocument TypeLanguageInstitutionInstitution with SubdivisionCountry
Collection span: 1969 - 2006
View: Overview   Sorted by journal name.

Page 11 of 38:  1  [  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20 ]  21   31 

#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
1001031135 1992 CLINICAL AND INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE-MEDECINE CLINIQUE ET EXPERIMENTALE 15 (6): 513-517
LEDLEY FD
THE QUALITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
01
10021122761 2002 CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH 8 (4): 957-962
Young-McCaughan S; Rich IM; Lindsay GC; Bertram KA
The Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program: Innovations in the federal funding of biomedical research
01
10030621700 1996 CLINICAL GENETICS 50 (6): 462-469
Clarke A; Parsons E; Williams A
Outcomes and process in genetic counselling
024
1004071262 1993 CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY 13 (6): 753-757
WITTE S
EDITORIAL QUALITY AND RHEOLOGICAL PUBLICATIONS
00
1005092985 2003 CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS 17 (4-5): 421-426
Powell TW; Muller N; Ball MJ
Electronic publishing: opportunities and challenges for clinical linguistics and phonetics
00
10061163373 2005 CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY 116 (1): 49-55
Pugdahl K; Tankisi H; Fuglsang-Frederiksen A; Johnsen B; de Carvalho M; et al.
Influence of medical audit on electrodiagnostic evaluation of polyneuropathy. A multicentre study
22
10071563374 2005 CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY 116 (7): 1571-1580
Tankisi H; Pugdahl K; Fuglsang-Frederiksen A; Johnsen B; de Carvalho M; et al.
Pathophysiology inferred from electrodiagnostic nerve tests and classification of polyneuropathies. Suggested guidelines
13
10082223574 2006 CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY 117 (5): 979-983
Tankisi H; Pugdahl K; Fuglsang-Frederiksen A; Johnsen B; de Carvalho M; et al.
Influence of peer review medical audit on pathophysiological interpretation of nerve conduction studies in polyneuropathies
00
10090302762 2002 CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST 16 (1): 97-104
Johnson-Greene D; Bechtold KT
Ethical considerations for peer review in forensic neuropsychology
01
1010041263 1993 CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (294): 4-6
WALKER DG
THE CLASSIC - BONE-RESORPTION RESTORED IN OSTEOPETROTIC MICE BY TRANSPLANTS OF NORMAL BONE-MARROW AND SPLEEN-CELLS (REPRINTED FROM SCIENCE, VOL 190, PG 784, 1975)
02
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
1011192217 1999 CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (359): 247-253
Murrey DB; Wright RW; Seiler JG; Day TE; Schwartz HS
Publication rates of abstracts presented at the 1993 Annual Academy Meeting
27
10123222986 2003 CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (415): 98-103
Jasko JJ; Wood JH; Schwartz HS
Publication rates of abstracts presented at annual musculoskeletal tumor society meetings
07
1013081847 1997 CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY 22 (2): 147-151
Harkness P; Brown P; Fowler S; Topham J
A national audit of sinus surgery. Results of the Royal College of Surgeons of England comparative audit of ENT surgery
09
10141112553 2001 CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY 26 (3): 253-256
Roy D; Sankar V; Hughes JP; Jones A; Fenton JE
Publication rates of scientific papers presented at the Otorhinolaryngological Research Society meetings
08
10150019 1972 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS 13 (5): 782-&
MORRIS RC
GUIDELINES FOR ACCEPTING VOLUNTEERS - CONSENT, ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS, AND FUNCTION OF A PEER REVIEW
05
1016261013 1991 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS 50 (1): 1-3
REIDENBERG JW; REIDENBERG MM
REPORT OF A SURVEY OF SOME ASPECTS OF EDITORIAL-BOARD PEER-REVIEW AT CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY-AND-THERAPEUTICS
23
1017001848 1997 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS 61 (2): PII99-PII99
Krappweis J; Schwarz U; Kirch W
Evaluation of drug therapy by peer review. An instrument for quality protection in primary health care.
00
1018172763 2002 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS 72 (5): 469-473
Reidenberg JW
Improving peer review: A guide for reviewers of biomedical research
13
10190121534 1995 CLINICAL RADIOLOGY 50 (9): 647-650
THOMAS RD; FAIRHURST JJ; FROST RA
WESSEX REGIONAL RADIOLOGY AUDIT - BARIUM ENEMA IN COLORECTAL-CARCINOMA
020
10200142554 2001 CLINICAL RADIOLOGY 56 (1): 44-49
Britton PD; McCann J; O'Driscoll D; Hunnam G; Warren RML
Interval cancer peer review in East Anglia: Implications for monitoring doctors as well as the NHS breast screening programme
13
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
10210113165 2004 CLINICAL RADIOLOGY 59 (9): 841-845
Melvin C; Bodley R; Booth A; Meagher T; Record C; et al.
Managing errors in radiology: a working model
03
10220203166 2004 CLINICAL RADIOLOGY 59 (11): 1018-1024
Stavem K; Foss T; Botnmark O; Andersen OK; Erikssen J
Inter-observer agreement in audit of quality of radiology requests and reports
04
102323159 1977 CLINICAL RESEARCH 25 (5): 295-296
KIRSCHSTEIN RL
PROPOSALS FOR IMPROVING PEER REVIEW SYSTEM OF NATIONAL-INSTITUTES-OF-HEALTH
02
102407160 1977 CLINICAL RESEARCH 25 (5): 297-305
BONDURANT S
PEER REVIEW OF RESEARCH-PROJECT GRANTS BY NIH STUDY SECTIONS - REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL MEDICAL POLICY, AMERICAN-SOCIETY-FOR-CLINICAL-INVESTIGATION
24
102513161 1977 CLINICAL RESEARCH 25 (5): 306-311
WIENER SL; URIVETZKY M; BREGMAN D; COHEN J; EICH R; et al.
PEER REVIEW - INTER-REVIEWER AGREEMENT DURING EVALUATION OF RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATIONS
44
102600290 1980 CLINICAL RESEARCH 28 (2): A292-A292
CHOKSHI AB; FRIEDMAN HS; MALACH MM; VASAVADA BC; BLEICHER SJ
THE IMPACT OF PEER-REVIEW IN REDUCING THE NUMBER OF PERMANENT PACEMAKER INSERTIONS
03
102700454 1983 CLINICAL RESEARCH 31 (5): A872-A872
DESILVA M; MIZE G; RISSING JP
ANTIBIOTIC AUDIT BY PEER-REVIEW - POSITIVE IMPACT ON PHYSICIAN PRESCRIBING
00
102800609 1986 CLINICAL RESEARCH 34 (4): 473-476
BRANDT EN
PEER-REVIEW - THE ATTACKS FROM WITHOUT
01
102900610 1986 CLINICAL RESEARCH 34 (4): 477-483
KIRSCHSTEIN RL
PEER-REVIEW - A CRISIS IN CONFIDENCE
01
103000812 1989 CLINICAL RESEARCH 37 (2): A325-A325
SAPIENZA P; LEVINE G; DAVIDSON J; GLASSMAN J; WEINRYB J; et al.
THE EFFECT OF PEER-REVIEW ON USE OF ENDOSCOPY
00
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
103100895 1990 CLINICAL RESEARCH 38 (2): A229-A229
ROSENTHAL GE; HOM D; LANDEFELD CS
PREVENTABLE HOSPITAL DEATH FROM MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - IS PEER-REVIEW RELIABLE
00
103200896 1990 CLINICAL RESEARCH 38 (2): A738-A738
EVANS AT; MCNUTT RA; FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON THE QUALITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
00
1033001014 1991 CLINICAL RESEARCH 39 (2): A607-A607
RUBIN HR; ROGERS WH; KAHN KL; RUBENSTEIN LV; BROOK RH
HOW WELL DO PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS DETECT PROBLEMS IN HOSPITAL-CARE
00
1034001136 1992 CLINICAL RESEARCH 40 (2): A583-A583
HAYWARD RA; MCMAHON LF; BERNARD AM
IMPLICIT QUALITY REVIEW OF GENERAL MEDICINE INPATIENTS - PEERING AT PEER-REVIEW
00
1035001137 1992 CLINICAL RESEARCH 40 (2): A604-A604
RUBIN HR; REDELMEIER DA; WU AW; STEINBERG EP
HOW RELIABLE IS PEER-REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC ABSTRACTS - LOOKING BACK AT THE 1991 ANNUAL-MEETING OF THE SOCIETY OF GENERAL INTERNAL-MEDICINE
00
1036001264 1993 CLINICAL RESEARCH 41 (2): A549-A549
RUBIN HR; WEISS S; DJURFELDT M; WILLAN A; MACKENZIE T
COMPARING CANADIAN HOSPITALS QUALITY OF CARE USING STRUCTURED IMPLICIT PEER-REVIEW
00
1037001375 1994 CLINICAL RESEARCH 42 (3): A369-A369
MAGNAN S; WARREN JB
INTERNAL-MEDICINE RESIDENT AND FACULTY ATTITUDES TOWARD PEER-REVIEW
00
10384272987 2003 CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK JOURNAL 31 (3): 295-313
Naiburg S
Mentors at the gate: Editors talk about clinical writing for journal publication
02
1039032555 2001 CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS 23 (11): 1902-1903
Coons SJ
The peer-review process
00
1040002764 2002 CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS 24 (10): 1646-1647
Lyles A
Peer review and evidence-based decisions
00
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
1041003375 2005 CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS 27 (12): 1962-1962
Mullins CD
The peer-review process: Gifts of time
00
10420153376 2005 CLINICAL TRIALS 2 (1): 80-87
Langston AL; McCallum M; Campbell MK; Robertson C; Ralston SH
An integrated approach to consumer representation and involvement in a multicentre randomized controlled trial
01
1043001265 1993 COASTAL MANAGEMENT 21 (2): 113-129
TUOHY WS
CHARACTERIZING THE SAN-FRANCISCO ESTUARY - A CASE-STUDY OF SCIENCE MANAGEMENT IN THE NATIONAL ESTUARY PROGRAM
04
10440312011 1998 COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES 59 (6): 512-522
Leysen JM; Black WK
Peer review in Carnegie Research Libraries
04
1045012218 1999 COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES 60 (6): 604-605
Finnegan GA
Silencing scientists and scholars in other fields: Power, paradigm controls, peer review, and scholarly communication.
00
1046012765 2002 COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES 63 (2): 205-206
Shiflett L
Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses.
00
10470121015 1991 COLLEGE COMPOSITION AND COMMUNICATION 42 (2): 184-199
HERRINGTON AJ; CADMAN D
PEER-REVIEW AND REVISING IN AN ANTHROPOLOGY COURSE - LESSONS FOR LEARNING
27
104805209 1978 COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL 14 (3): 190-198
MAGUIRE L
PEER REVIEW IN COMMUNITY MENTAL-HEALTH
01
1049023611 1986 COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL 22 (4): 265-274
STAHLER GJ; RAPPAPORT H
DO THERAPISTS BIAS THEIR RATINGS OF PATIENT FUNCTIONING UNDER PEER-REVIEW
09
10500132219 1999 COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL 35 (4): 361-365
Gillig PM; Barr A
A model for multidisciplinary peer review and supervision of behavioral health clinicians
01
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
1051001849 1997 COMPENDIUM ON CONTINUING EDUCATION FOR THE PRACTICING VETERINARIAN 19 (3): 261-261
Macintire DK
Compendium's refereed peer review: What does it mean to you?
00
1052013118 1976 COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY 17 (1): 195-201
BONSTEDT T; SMITH JJ
ONE YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH PEER REVIEW IN A PSYCHIATRIC-HOSPITAL
02
105311897 1990 COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY 31 (1): 1-4
OCONNELL RA
PEER-REVIEW AND COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY
00
10540111701 1996 COMPUTER NETWORKS AND ISDN SYSTEMS 28 (7-11): 1523-1538
Mathews GJ; Jacobs BE
Electronic management of the peer review process
04
10550181702 1996 COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS 20 (6): 423-431
Doyle MD; Ang CS; Martin DC; Noe A
The visible embryo project: Embedded program objects for knowledge access, creation and management through the World Wide Web
03
10560162012 1998 COMPUTERS & EDUCATION 30 (1-2): 111-115
Davies R; Berrow T
An evaluation of the use of computer supported peer review for developing higher-level skills
36
10570232375 2000 COMPUTERS & EDUCATION 35 (4): 251-262
Hammond M
Communication within on-line forums: the opportunities, the constraints and the value of a communicative approach
010
10580251850 1997 COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES 23 (5): 503-512
Carr TR; Buchanan RC; AdkinsHeljeson D; Mettille TD; Sorensen J
The future of scientific communication in the earth sciences: The impact of the Internet
02
10590212376 2000 COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES 26 (3A): A123-A132
Loudon TV
Geoscience after IT Part M. Business requirements drive the information system, and provide coherent frameworks. Epilog
00
10600192377 2000 COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES 26 (6): 647-655
Prothero WA
Keeping our focus: a perspective on distance learning and the large introductory science class
11
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
10610162556 2001 COMPUTERS IN NURSING 19 (3): 105-110
Ribbons B; Vance S
Using e-mail to facilitate nursing scholarship
04
10620063 1974 CONNECTICUT MEDICINE 38 (7): 357-358
MOORE FD
PEER REVIEW AND ALL THAT - 3 LITTLE WORDS
00
106300210 1978 CONNECTICUT MEDICINE 42 (10): 679-679
ISELE WP
PEER REVIEW - MARYLAND CASE
00
106400245 1979 CONNECTICUT MEDICINE 43 (1): 27-30
GREER JG; DOBSON A
MEDICAL PEER REVIEW AND THE PSROS - CURRENT FINDINGS ON RELATIVE COST AND EFFICIENCY
01
106500246 1979 CONNECTICUT MEDICINE 43 (9): 571-575
BRUNNELL RJ
CONNECTICUTS PEER-REVIEW IMMUNITY STATUTE - LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF PA-76-413
00
106600326 1981 CONNECTICUT MEDICINE 45 (3): 191-191
ISELE WP
LEGAL UPDATE - A MARYLAND PEER-REVIEW CASE
00
106700399 1982 CONNECTICUT MEDICINE 46 (8): 463-465
[Anon]
PRINCIPLES FOR VOLUNTARY MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW - AN INTERIM-REPORT
00
106800400 1982 CONNECTICUT MEDICINE 46 (11): 651-656
SUBER DG
PEER-REVIEW - A LEGAL UPDATE - WITH A SUMMARY OF STATE LAWS ON IMMUNITY
00
10691632378 2000 CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 14 (2): 356-365
Kleiman DG; Reading RP; Miller BJ; Clark TW; Scott M; et al.
Improving the evaluation of conservation programs
013
1070162557 2001 CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 15 (5): 1269-1273
Hecht A; Parkin MJ
Improving peer review of listings and recovery plans under the Endangered Species Act
11
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
10710532988 2003 CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 17 (4): 968-975
Linklater WL
Science and management in a conservation crisis: A case study with rhinoceros
01
10720312989 2003 CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 17 (5): 1270-1275
Noss RF
A checklist for wildlands network designs
08
10730203377 2005 CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 19 (6): 1969-1977
Regan TJ; Burgman MA; McCarthy MA; Master LL; Keith DA; et al.
The consistency of extinction risk classification protocols
01
10740412766 2002 CONSERVATION ECOLOGY 5 (2): Art. No. 8
Marmorek D; Peters C
Finding a PATH toward scientific collaboration: Insights from the Columbia River basin
00
107500504 1984 CONSULTING ENGINEER 62 (1): 24-&
WILLIS SK
PEER-REVIEW SEEKS TO IMPROVE QUALITY
00
10760471266 1993 CONTEMPORARY POLICY ISSUES 11 (1): 88-98
ROTHMAN DS; CHAPMAN D
A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY RESEARCH
00
1077061376 1994 CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOLOGY 39 (11): 1043-1044
CRANDALL R
THE GATEKEEPERS OF PSYCHOLOGY - EVALUATION OF PEER-REVIEW - HARCUM,ER, ROSEN,EF
02
1078032990 2003 CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOLOGY-APA REVIEW OF BOOKS 48 (1): 41-43
Battin DB; Ceci SJ
Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses
00
107947291 1980 CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY-A JOURNAL OF REVIEWS 9 (2): 204-207
CHUBIN DE
PEER-REVIEW IN THE NATIONAL-SCIENCE-FOUNDATION - PHASE ONE OF A STUDY - COLE,S, RUBIN,L, COLE,JR
57
1080011016 1991 CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY-A JOURNAL OF REVIEWS 20 (4): 603-605
COLE S
PEERLESS SCIENCE - PEER-REVIEW AND UNITED-STATES SCIENCE POLICY - CHUBIN,DE, HACKETT,EJ
00
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
10810442991 2003 CONTRACEPTION 67 (2): 115-132
Moos MK; Bartholomew NE; Lohr KN
Counseling in the clinical setting to prevent unintended pregnancy: an evidence-based research agenda
08
10827151138 1992 CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS 13 (6): 443-445
RENNIE D
SUSPENDED JUDGMENT - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - LET US PUT IT ON TRIAL
22
10835211703 1996 CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS 17 (1): 1-12
Jadad AR; Moore RA; Carroll D; Jenkinson C; Reynolds DJM; et al.
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
81447
1084002992 2003 CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS 24: 69S-69S
Carpenter J; Evans S; Kenward M
A method for utilising expert opinion to interpret a RCT with non-response, applied to a RCT of interventions to improve peer review
00
10850232993 2003 CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS 24 (3): 294-305
Feldon SE; Scherer RW; Hooper FJ; Kelman S; Baker RS; et al.
Surgical quality assurance in the ischemic optic neuropathy decompression trial (IONDT)
01
1086001851 1997 CORNEA 16 (6): 601-601
Mannis MJ; Sugar J
Peer review and Cornea
00
10870102767 2002 CORTEX 38 (3): 403-405
Bornstein RF
Peer-review in neuropsychology: Can we increase effectiveness without sacrificing rigor?
12
1088032768 2002 CORTEX 38 (3): 406-407
Jelicic M; Merckelbach H
Peer-review: Let's imitate the lawyers!
11
1089002769 2002 CORTEX 38 (3): 411-411
Carlstedt RA
Cortex forum on peer-review multiple submissions
11
1090002770 2002 CORTEX 38 (3): 412-412
Klein DF
Peer review and data access
00
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
1091002771 2002 CORTEX 38 (3): 417-418
Marques JF
Naive views of peer-review and what do they tell us
00
1092002772 2002 CORTEX 38 (3): 419-420
Bock O
The peer-review process: Accept, revise, or reject?
00
10930352379 2000 CRITICAL CARE 4: S8-S15
Sibbald WJ
An alternative pathway for preclinical research in fluid management
06
10940173167 2004 CRITICAL CARE 8 (6): 403-405
Lavery JV; Van Laethem MLP; Slutsky AS
Monitoring and oversight in critical care research
00
1095010813 1989 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 17 (12): S169-S172
TERES D
PEER-REVIEW, PUBLICATION POLICY, AND APACHE
04
10960921139 1992 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 20 (6): 884-890
BONE RC
PHOSPHOLIPIDS AND THEIR INHIBITORS - A CRITICAL-EVALUATION OF THEIR ROLE IN THE TREATMENT OF SEPSIS
143
109711041140 1992 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 20 (6): 891-898
BONE RC
INHIBITORS OF COMPLEMENT AND NEUTROPHILS - A CRITICAL-EVALUATION OF THEIR ROLE IN THE TREATMENT OF SEPSIS
056
1098001704 1996 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 24 (2): S90-S94
Thompson WL; Bellamy R; Cummins RO; Delooz HH; Dick W; et al.
Funding resuscitation research
01
1099002220 1999 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 27 (12): A150-A150
Kopatsis A; Nicastro JM; Castellano MR; Fields CA; Lowry J; et al.
24-hour peer review of initial trauma radiographs does not change diagnosis and management of moderate and severely injured trauma patients
00
11000662773 2002 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 30 (7): 1636-1643
Cook D; Brower R; Cooper J; Brochard L; Vincent JL
Multicenter clinical research in adult critical care
04

Page 11 of 38:  1  [  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20 ]  21   31