| Ranked All-Publication list | Historiographs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
| View: Overview | Sorted by LCS. |
Page 9 of 38: [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ] 11 21 31
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 801 | 0 | 10 | 2767 2002 CORTEX 38 (3): 403-405 Bornstein RF Peer-review in neuropsychology: Can we increase effectiveness without sacrificing rigor? | 1 | 2 |
| 802 | 0 | 3 | 2768 2002 CORTEX 38 (3): 406-407 Jelicic M; Merckelbach H Peer-review: Let's imitate the lawyers! | 1 | 1 |
| 803 | 0 | 0 | 2769 2002 CORTEX 38 (3): 411-411 Carlstedt RA Cortex forum on peer-review multiple submissions | 1 | 1 |
| 804 | 0 | 9 | 2792 2002 FERTILITY AND STERILITY 77 (5): 883-888 Kempers RD Ethical issues in biomedical publications | 1 | 5 |
| 805 | 2 | 42 | 2814 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287 (21): 2805-2808 Lee KP; Schotland M; Bacchetti P; Bero LA Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles | 1 | 37 |
| 806 | 2 | 14 | 2817 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287 (21): 2859-2863 Schwartz LM; Woloshin S; Baczek L Media coverage of scientific meetings - Too much, too soon? | 1 | 21 |
| 807 | 0 | 41 | 2819 2002 JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING 37 (1): 63-70 Pitney WA; Ilsley P; Rintala J The professional socialization of certified athletic trainers in the National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I context | 1 | 3 |
| 808 | 0 | 0 | 2820 2002 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL RHYTHMS 17 (2): 194-194 Pupique M Peer review my foot! | 1 | 1 |
| 809 | 3 | 29 | 2846 2002 JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE 52 (2): 229-234 Norris R; Woods R; Harbrecht B; Fabian T; Rhodes M; et al. TRISS unexpected survivors: An outdated standard? | 1 | 6 |
| 810 | 2 | 5 | 2849 2002 JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 168 (5): 2123-2125 Smith JA; Nixon R; Bueschen AJ; Venable DD; Henry HH The impact of blinded versus unblinded abstract review on scientific program content | 1 | 3 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 811 | 1 | 11 | 2876 2002 NERVENARZT 73 (10): 956-+ Abragam A; Lincke HO; Lux A; Wallech CW Peer review of routine clinical case reports - an instrument of quality management? Results of a pilot investigation | 1 | 2 |
| 812 | 1 | 24 | 2900 2002 RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION 32 (2): 181-189 Larochelle M; Desautels J On peers, those 'particular friends' | 1 | 1 |
| 813 | 2 | 25 | 2902 2002 RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION 32 (2): 215-240 Roth WM Editorial power/authorial suffering | 1 | 2 |
| 814 | 0 | 16 | 2904 2002 RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION 32 (2): 257-268 Mruck K; Mey G Between printed past and digital future | 1 | 2 |
| 815 | 0 | 56 | 2906 2002 RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION 32 (4): 437-463 Zembal-Saul C; Munford D; Crawford B; Friedrichsen P; Land S Scaffolding preservice science teachers' evidence-based arguments during an investigation of natural selection | 1 | 5 |
| 816 | 5 | 15 | 2912 2002 SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 8 (1): 99-108 Spier RE Peer review and innovation | 1 | 2 |
| 817 | 2 | 11 | 2913 2002 SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 8 (1): 109-112 Chubin DE Much ado about peer review, part 2 - Commentary on "Peer review and innovation" (Spier) | 1 | 1 |
| 818 | 3 | 6 | 2922 2002 TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE 14 (3): 142-143 Colliver JA Commentary on Cicchetti's "Reliability of peer review"' | 1 | 1 |
| 819 | 1 | 12 | 2924 2002 TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY 30 (1): 80-87 Deschl U; Kittel B; Rittinghausen S; Morawietz G; Kohler M; et al. The value of historical control data - Scientific advantages for pathologists, industry and agencies | 1 | 4 |
| 820 | 1 | 26 | 2925 2002 TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY 30 (1): 88-92 Boorman GA; Haseman JK; Waters MD; Hardisty JF; Sills RC Quality review procedures necessary for rodent pathology Databases and toxicogenomic studies: The National Toxicology Program experience | 1 | 16 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 821 | 0 | 5 | 2929 2002 VIRUS RESEARCH 89 (2): 175-181 Kitchener H Evidence-based medicine applied to cervical cancer | 1 | 1 |
| 822 | 2 | 24 | 2936 2003 ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY 10 (5): 543-553 Grunewald M; Heckermann RA; Gebhard H; Lell M; Bautz WA COMPARE Radiology: Creating an interactive Web-based training program for radiology with multimedia authoring software | 1 | 9 |
| 823 | 4 | 10 | 2939 2003 ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION 27 (2): 47-52 Benos DJ; Kirk KL; Hall JE How to review a paper | 1 | 6 |
| 824 | 0 | 8 | 2940 2003 AMERICAN BIOLOGY TEACHER 65 (4): 270-278 Gift N; Krasny M The great fossil fiasco: Teaching about peer review | 1 | 2 |
| 825 | 1 | 17 | 2941 2003 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY 18 (3): 97-103 Sheikh K; Bullock C Effectiveness of interventions for reducing the frequency of radical prostatectomy procedures in the elderly: An evaluation | 1 | 1 |
| 826 | 1 | 10 | 2952 2003 AMERICAN SURGEON 69 (3): 257-260 Shanti CM; Tyburski JG; Rishell KB; Wilson RF; Lozen Y; et al. Correlation of Revised Trauma Score and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) predicted probability of survival with peer-reviewed determination of trauma deaths | 1 | 3 |
| 827 | 0 | 6 | 2958 2003 ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY 73 (12): 1041-1043 Spigelman AD; Swan J Measuring clinical audit and peer review practice in a diverse health care setting | 1 | 2 |
| 828 | 0 | 21 | 2994 2003 CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION 19 (3): 149-154 Wager E; Field EA; Grossman L Good publication practice for pharmaceutical companies | 1 | 27 |
| 829 | 0 | 14 | 2998 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 111 (12): 1550-1558 Kanno J; Onyon L; Peddada S; Ashby J; Jacob E; et al. The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay. Phase 2: Coded single-dose studies | 1 | 26 |
| 830 | 2 | 47 | 3027 2003 JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES 43 (2): 362-373 Warr WA Evaluation of an experimental chemistry preprint server | 1 | 1 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 831 | 1 | 25 | 3055 2003 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 54 (10): 926-938 Brown C The changing face of scientific discourse: Analysis of genomic and proteomic database usage and acceptance | 1 | 6 |
| 832 | 9 | 34 | 3057 2003 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY 166: 279-300 Jayasinghe UW; Marsh HW; Bond N A multilevel cross-classified modelling approach to peer review of grant proposals: the effects of assessor and researcher attributes on assessor ratings | 1 | 2 |
| 833 | 3 | 4 | 3060 2003 LANCET 362 (9385): 747-747 Pravinkumar E Peer review and appeal: flawed but trusted? | 1 | 1 |
| 834 | 1 | 29 | 3061 2003 LANCET 362 (9393): 1404-1408 Lanier DC; Roland M; Burstin H; Knottnerus JA Doctor performance and public accountability | 1 | 9 |
| 835 | 5 | 15 | 3064 2003 LEARNED PUBLISHING 16 (1): 15-20 Williamson A What will happen to peer review? | 1 | 4 |
| 836 | 1 | 19 | 3067 2003 LEARNED PUBLISHING 16 (4): 249-258 Wets K; Weedon D; Velterop J Post-publication filtering and evaluation: Faculty of 1000 | 1 | 2 |
| 837 | 5 | 10 | 3069 2003 MARINE ECOLOGY-PROGRESS SERIES 258: 297-309 Riisgard HU; Kinne O; Fenchel T; Fee E; Hesslein R; et al. Misuse of the peer-review system: time for countermeasures? | 1 | 7 |
| 838 | 2 | 21 | 3072 2003 MEDICAL TEACHER 25 (2): 131-135 Beckman TJ; Lee MC; Rohren CH; Pankratz VS Evaluating an instrument for the peer review of inpatient teaching | 1 | 6 |
| 839 | 2 | 5 | 3082 2003 NURSING RESEARCH 52 (1): 67-68 Chan ZCY Peer review gives voices to novice researchers | 1 | 1 |
| 840 | 0 | 39 | 3083 2003 NURSING RESEARCH 52 (4): 256-261 Conn VS; Valentine JC; Cooper HM; Rantz MJ Grey literature in meta-analyses | 1 | 10 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 841 | 1 | 70 | 3090 2003 PSICOTHEMA 15 (1): 23-35 Buela-Casal G Evaluating quality of articles and scientific journals. Proposal of weighted impact factor and a quality index? | 1 | 15 |
| 842 | 0 | 10 | 3133 2004 ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY 77 (6): 1960-1965 Herbert MA; Prince SL; Williams JL; Magee MJ; Mack MJ Are unaudited records from an outcomes registry database accurate? | 1 | 5 |
| 843 | 0 | 82 | 3139 2004 BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES 66 (3): 333-348 Shimp CP Ambiguity, logic, simplicity, and dynamics: Wittgenstemian evaluative criteria in peer review of quantitative research on categorization | 1 | 1 |
| 844 | 4 | 11 | 3141 2004 BIOSCIENCE 54 (3): 234-239 Cassey P; Blackburn TM Publication and rejection among successful ecologists | 1 | 2 |
| 845 | 3 | 12 | 3148 2004 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 328 (7441): 657-658 Davidoff F Improving peer review: who's responsible? Peer review needs recognition at every stage of scientific life | 1 | 5 |
| 846 | 0 | 35 | 3150 2004 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 329 (7463): 431-433 Welschen I; Kuyvenhoven MM; Hoes AW; Verheij TJM Effectiveness of a multiple intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract symptoms in primary care: randomised controlled trial | 1 | 16 |
| 847 | 0 | 3 | 3183 2004 FERTILITY AND STERILITY 82 (1): 260-260 Meldrum DR Open electronic debate-even your obituary fails to escape peer review! | 1 | 1 |
| 848 | 0 | 30 | 3192 2004 HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW 29 (2): 129-138 Kaissi A; Kralewski J; Curoe A; Dowd B; Silversmith J How does the culture of medical group practices influence the types of programs used to assure quality of care? | 1 | 3 |
| 849 | 8 | 17 | 3217 2004 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE 30 (1): 2-11 Wood M; Roberts M; Howell B The reliability of peer reviews of papers on information systems | 1 | 3 |
| 850 | 2 | 6 | 3224 2004 JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH 40 (7): 397-398 Isaacs D Who teaches the referee? | 1 | 1 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 851 | 0 | 2 | 3254 2004 NATURE 429 (6994): 803-803 Van Meir EG Opening the chamber of peer-review secrets | 1 | 1 |
| 852 | 0 | 5 | 3264 2004 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 350 (2): 103-104 Steinbrook R Peer review and federal regulations | 1 | 5 |
| 853 | 0 | 3 | 3268 2004 NURSING RESEARCH 53 (4): 213-213 Dougherty MC Open peer review - A first step | 1 | 1 |
| 854 | 4 | 40 | 3278 2004 QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE 13 (5): 356-362 Macfarlane F; Greenhalgh T; Schofield T; Desombre T RCGP quality team development programme: an illuminative evaluation | 1 | 2 |
| 855 | 9 | 28 | 3283 2004 RESEARCH POLICY 33 (3): 443-454 Viner N; Powell P; Green R Institutionalized biases in the award of research grants: a preliminary analysis revisiting the principle of accumulative advantage | 1 | 2 |
| 856 | 11 | 105 | 3304 2004 ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE 33 (1): 62-83 Hirschauer S Peer review research - Reviewed - Sociological shortcomings of academic evaluation | 1 | 3 |
| 857 | 1 | 35 | 3331 2005 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 162 (8): 1521-1526 Desai MM; Rosenheck RA; Craig TJ Screening for alcohol use disorders among medical outpatients: The influence of individual and facility characteristics | 1 | 2 |
| 858 | 1 | 56 | 3374 2005 CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY 116 (7): 1571-1580 Tankisi H; Pugdahl K; Fuglsang-Frederiksen A; Johnsen B; de Carvalho M; et al. Pathophysiology inferred from electrodiagnostic nerve tests and classification of polyneuropathies. Suggested guidelines | 1 | 3 |
| 859 | 0 | 13 | 3400 2005 INNOVATIONS IN APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 3533: 685-694 Crespo RM; Pardo A; Perez JPS; Kloos CD An algorithm for peer review matching using student profiles based on fuzzy classification and genetic algorithms | 1 | 1 |
| 860 | 3 | 13 | 3410 2005 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 11 (2): 205-206 Friedman L; Richter ED Conflicts of interest and scientific integrity | 1 | 3 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 861 | 5 | 17 | 3441 2005 JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP 37 (1): 87-94 Freda MC; Kearney M An international survey of nurse editors' roles and practices | 1 | 1 |
| 862 | 0 | 11 | 3463 2005 LEARNED PUBLISHING 18 (3): 212-220 Nicholas D; Jamali HR; Huntington P; Rowlands I In their very own words: authors and scholarly journal publishing | 1 | 1 |
| 863 | 8 | 57 | 3487 2005 ORGANIZATION SCIENCE 16 (2): 180-200 Starbuck WH How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication | 1 | 4 |
| 864 | 9 | 27 | 3492 2005 PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 116 (5): 1461-1472 Loonen MPJ; Hage JJ; Kon M Who benefits from peer review? An analysis of the outcome of 100 requests for review by Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | 1 | 1 |
| 865 | 5 | 6 | 3494 2005 PLOS BIOLOGY 3 (9): Art. No. e326 Mainguy G; Motamedi MR; Mietchen D Peer review - The newcomers' perspective | 1 | 1 |
| 866 | 7 | 39 | 3498 2005 RESEARCH EVALUATION 14 (1): 15-20 Bornmann L; Daniel HD Committee peer review at an international research foundation: predictive validity and fairness of selection decisions on post-graduate fellowship applications | 1 | 1 |
| 867 | 19 | 32 | 3501 2005 RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH 28 (6): 444-452 Kearney MH; Freda MC Nurse editors' views on the peer review process | 1 | 2 |
| 868 | 2 | 4 | 3503 2005 REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE 133 (1): 9-10 Reyes H; Palma J; Andresen M The Editorial Advisory Committee: New members with greater responsibilities | 1 | 1 |
| 869 | 4 | 28 | 3516 2005 SCIENTOMETRICS 62 (1): 133-143 Van Raan AFJ Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods | 1 | 11 |
| 870 | 0 | 5 | 3520 2005 SCIENTOMETRICS 65 (3): 391-392 Bornmann L; Daniel HD Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? | 1 | 6 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 871 | 0 | 0 | 3549 2006 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 47 (2): 157-159 Berger E Peer review: A castle built on sand or the bedrock of scientific publishing? | 1 | 1 |
| 872 | 1 | 12 | 3552 2006 ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND 88 (1): 52-56 Weale AR; Edwards AG; Lear PA; Morgan JDT From meeting presentation to peer-review publication - a UK review | 1 | 1 |
| 873 | 2 | 4 | 3592 2006 HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES 51 (2): 350-351 Makropoulos C; Butler D; Maksimovic C Discussion of "Editorial - The peer-review system: prospects and challenges" | 1 | 1 |
| 874 | 1 | 4 | 3593 2006 HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES 51 (2): 352-353 Pannell DJ Discussion of "Editorial - The peer-review system: prospects and challenges" | 1 | 1 |
| 875 | 1 | 1 | 3594 2006 HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES 51 (2): 354-354 Schumann AH Discussion of "Editorial - The peer-review system: prospects and challenges" | 1 | 1 |
| 876 | 1 | 1 | 3595 2006 HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES 51 (2): 355-356 Wong TSW Discussion of "Editorial - The peer-review system: prospects and challenges" | 1 | 1 |
| 877 | 1 | 2 | 3599 2006 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS 27 (4): 357-357 Geddes A; O'Hara C Rapid peer review and increased impact (vol 27, pg 357, 2006) | 1 | 1 |
| 878 | 7 | 15 | 3605 2006 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 295 (14): 1675-1680 Ross JS; Gross CP; Desai MM; Hong YL; Grant AO; et al. Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance | 1 | 2 |
| 879 | 9 | 13 | 3632 2006 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE 99 (4): 178-182 Smith R Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals | 1 | 5 |
| 880 | 10 | 20 | 3648 2006 MEDICAL EDUCATION 40 (9): 832-839 Regehr G; Bordage G To blind or not to blind? What authors and reviewers prefer | 1 | 2 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 881 | 3 | 33 | 3695 2006 SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 12 (1): 41-52 Farthing MJG Authors and publication practices | 1 | 1 |
| 882 | 0 | 0 | 3698 2006 SCIENTIST 20 (2): 26-+ McCook A Is peer review broken? | 1 | 3 |
| 883 | 0 | 0 | 1 1969 FDA PAPERS 3 (9): 4-& HAMPSHIR.GD NAS-NRC DRUG EFFICACY STUDY - PEER REVIEW | 0 | 1 |
| 884 | 1 | 2 | 4 1970 CALIFORNIA MEDICINE 113 (6): 75-& DAIGER S PEER REVIEW - COST CONTROL OR QUALITY CONTROL | 0 | 3 |
| 885 | 0 | 1 | 5 1970 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 213 (10): 1686-& KATZ R PEER REVIEW INVOLVING NONMEMBERS OF MEDICAL SOCIETIES | 0 | 0 |
| 886 | 0 | 14 | 6 1971 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY 25 (1): 16-18 CARR SH PEER REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 887 | 0 | 0 | 9 1971 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION 46 (7): 634-& NORRIS FS CONTROL OF MALPRACTICE BY PEER REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 888 | 0 | 1 | 10 1971 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 215 (2): 298-& RITCHEY J PEER REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 889 | 0 | 5 | 11 1971 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 215 (11): 1823-& GREENBLA.GM PATHOLOGY OF PEER REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 890 | 0 | 0 | 14 1971 NEW YORK STATE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 71 (21): 2584-& MARBACH B WHY NOT PEER REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 891 | 0 | 0 | 15 1971 SCIENCE 173 (3992): 106-& GROSS J PEER REVIEW SYSTEM | 0 | 0 |
| 892 | 0 | 0 | 16 1972 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND ARCHIVES OF AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OPTOMETRY 49 (10): 884-& WERNER DL PEER REVIEW IN AN INSTITUTIONAL SETTING EXPERIENCE AT OPTOMETRIC CENTER OF NEW YORK | 0 | 0 |
| 893 | 0 | 0 | 17 1972 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND ARCHIVES OF AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OPTOMETRY 49 (11): 976-& ROSENTHA.J; FOLSOM W; BERNSTEI.M SURVEY OF SPECTACLE PRESCRIBING BY OPTOMETRIST - AN INSTRUMENT FOR PEER REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 894 | 0 | 0 | 18 1972 CALIFORNIA MEDICINE 117 (2): 66-& SOLARI RA PEER REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 895 | 0 | 0 | 19 1972 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS 13 (5): 782-& MORRIS RC GUIDELINES FOR ACCEPTING VOLUNTEERS - CONSENT, ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS, AND FUNCTION OF A PEER REVIEW | 0 | 5 |
| 896 | 0 | 2 | 20 1972 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND NEW DRUGS 12 (10): 407-& CATHCART HR PEER REVIEW CONTROL OF DRUG UTILIZATION IN TEACHING HOSPITALS | 0 | 1 |
| 897 | 0 | 0 | 22 1972 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATION NS12 (4): 166-& LAVENTUR.M UTILIZATION AND PEER REVIEW BY PHARMACISTS | 0 | 3 |
| 898 | 0 | 0 | 23 1972 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATION NS12 (4): 171-& BOISSERE.VR CASE STUDY IN PEER REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 899 | 0 | 0 | 24 1973 AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN 7 (4): 29-29 BHASIN R PEER REVIEW PROGRESS | 0 | 0 |
| 900 | 0 | 0 | 28 1973 CALIFORNIA MEDICINE 119 (6): 58-59 [Anon] WHERE WE STAND - CMA POSITION PAPERS - QUALITY MEDICAL-CARE - PEER REVIEW, CONTINUING MEDICAL-EDUCATION | 0 | 0 |