| Ranked All-Publication list | Historiographs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
| View: Overview | Sorted by LCS. |
Page 6 of 38: [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ] 11 21 31
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 501 | 3 | 7 | 253 1979 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION 54 (7): 578-580 SLOANE P; LESSNE S; BORDEN S PEER-REVIEW BY RESIDENTS | 1 | 3 |
| 502 | 0 | 3 | 254 1979 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION 54 (11): 852-855 GARG ML; GLIEBE WA; KLEINBERG WM STUDENT PEER-REVIEW OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS AT THE MEDICAL-COLLEGE-OF-OHIO | 1 | 6 |
| 503 | 0 | 0 | 272 1979 SCIENCE 204 (4393): 601-602 MARSHALL E PEER-REVIEW COMES TO ADAMHA | 1 | 2 |
| 504 | 0 | 1 | 273 1979 SCIENCE 204 (4398): 1154-& ROY R PROPOSALS, PEER-REVIEW, AND RESEARCH RESULTS | 1 | 4 |
| 505 | 0 | 0 | 289 1980 CHEST 78 (4): 547-548 SOFFER A THE UNIQUE ROLE OF PEER-REVIEW JOURNALS | 1 | 5 |
| 506 | 1 | 5 | 315 1980 SCIENCE 208 (4447): 974-& HARNAD S PEER-REVIEW - AN EXPERIMENT | 1 | 1 |
| 507 | 0 | 0 | 319 1981 ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 141 (9): 1121-1121 SPODICK DH THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM AND THE EDITORS CORRESPONDENCE | 1 | 3 |
| 508 | 0 | 11 | 323 1981 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 124 (3): 251-253 MORGAN PP PEER-REVIEW AND SCIENTIFIC METHOD IN CLINICAL RESEARCH | 1 | 6 |
| 509 | 5 | 19 | 327 1981 HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 16 (3): 267-275 EICHHORN RL; MAURANA CA PEER-REVIEW IN HEALTH-SERVICES RESEARCH - ISSUES AND PROBLEMS | 1 | 1 |
| 510 | 0 | 0 | 328 1981 IEEE SPECTRUM 18 (8): 21-21 CHRISTIANSEN D PEER-REVIEW REVIEWED | 1 | 1 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 511 | 0 | 6 | 353 1981 SCIENCE 212 (4501): 1338-1339 ROY R ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW - REPLY | 1 | 2 |
| 512 | 0 | 0 | 365 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 200-201 BELSHAW C PEER-REVIEW AND THE CURRENT-ANTHROPOLOGY EXPERIENCE | 1 | 5 |
| 513 | 0 | 4 | 371 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 216-217 HONIG WM PEER-REVIEW IN THE PHYSICAL SCIENCES - AN EDITORS VIEW | 1 | 3 |
| 514 | 1 | 3 | 373 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 219-220 LOUTTIT RT PEER-REVIEW - PREDICTION OF THE FUTURE OR JUDGMENT OF THE PAST | 1 | 1 |
| 515 | 0 | 0 | 377 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 230-231 PALERMO DS BIASES, DECISIONS AND AUCTORIAL REBUTTAL IN THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 1 | 2 |
| 516 | 0 | 0 | 384 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 242-243 WILSON WA RESEARCH ON PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES - PROBLEMS OF INTERPRETATION, APPLICATION, AND PROPRIETY | 1 | 5 |
| 517 | 0 | 0 | 387 1982 BIOSCIENCE 32 (1): 10-12 BODDE T EVALUATION OF PEER-REVIEW DRAWS MIXED REACTIONS | 1 | 1 |
| 518 | 3 | 19 | 397 1982 BULLETIN OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY 2 (5): 423-432 CHUBIN DE PEER-REVIEW AND THE COURTS - NOTES OF A PARTICIPANT SCIENTIST | 1 | 4 |
| 519 | 0 | 0 | 420 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 23-26 WILLENS J; DELEON PH POLITICAL ASPECTS OF PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 3 |
| 520 | 1 | 6 | 423 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 74-78 KAZANJIAN V PEER-REVIEW - A PRIVATE-PRACTICE MODEL | 1 | 2 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 521 | 0 | 2 | 424 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 105-111 LASSEN CL THE COLORADO MEDICARE STUDY - PERSPECTIVE OF THE PEER-REVIEW COMMITTEE | 1 | 2 |
| 522 | 3 | 11 | 431 1982 SCIENCE 215 (4530): 240-240 CHUBIN DE REFORM OF PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 1 |
| 523 | 1 | 2 | 441 1983 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 74 (3): 494-495 DIXON GF; SCHONFELD SA; ALTMAN M; WHITCOMB ME THE PEER-REVIEW AND EDITORIAL PROCESS - A LIMITED EVALUATION | 1 | 1 |
| 524 | 0 | 0 | 453 1983 CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN 29 (MAY): 857-857 MCCAFFERY M PEER-REVIEW - OR SNEER REVIEW | 1 | 1 |
| 525 | 0 | 0 | 460 1983 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 250 (17): 2305-2306 ROSEN HM; SUSSMAN EJ MAKING PEER-REVIEW MORE PRODUCTIVE | 1 | 1 |
| 526 | 0 | 0 | 465 1983 JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW 8 (2): 293-313 HASTINGS DA LEGAL ISSUES RAISED BY PRIVATE REVIEW ACTIVITIES OF MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS | 1 | 2 |
| 527 | 0 | 1 | 476 1983 NEW SCIENTIST 100 (1387): 752-753 CHERFAS J PEER COMMENTARY ON PEER-REVIEW - HARNAD,S | 1 | 1 |
| 528 | 0 | 7 | 477 1983 NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL 96 (728): 214-215 MCKEAN WI PEER-REVIEW - CENTRAL-SPECIALIST-COMMITTEE STATEMENT | 1 | 2 |
| 529 | 0 | 6 | 478 1983 NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL 96 (728): 216-217 WEST SR PEER-REVIEW - CENTRAL-EDUCATION-COMMITTEE STATEMENT | 1 | 2 |
| 530 | 0 | 0 | 492 1983 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 64 (11): 373-374 [Anon] THE MEDICAL-ASSOCIATION AND PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 531 | 10 | 29 | 497 1984 AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST 27 (5): 631-648 COHEN LH; STRAUSSZERBY S PEER-REVIEW OF PSYCHOTHERAPY | 1 | 2 |
| 532 | 18 | 28 | 501 1984 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 18 (1): 64-69 KOSKY R PEER-REVIEW - A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON THE AMERICAN-EXPERIENCE 1972-1982 | 1 | 1 |
| 533 | 8 | 18 | 502 1984 CANCER INVESTIGATION 2 (4): 311-320 LEVY JA PEER-REVIEW - THE CONTINUAL NEED FOR REASSESSMENT | 1 | 2 |
| 534 | 0 | 2 | 505 1984 EMPLOYEE RELATIONS LAW JOURNAL 9 (4): 659-671 COOMBE JD PEER-REVIEW - THE EMERGING SUCCESSFUL APPLICATION | 1 | 5 |
| 535 | 2 | 21 | 513 1984 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL RESPONSE MODIFIERS 3 (1): 10-14 ARMSTRONG JS PEER-REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS | 1 | 1 |
| 536 | 0 | 1 | 520 1984 NATURE 311 (5985): 406-406 BRIDGES B PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 1 |
| 537 | 0 | 0 | 530 1984 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 65 (21): 863-864 VERCUEIL AE PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 1 |
| 538 | 1 | 3 | 540 1985 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 103 (3): 470-471 RAZA A; PREISLER HD PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 1 |
| 539 | 0 | 0 | 556 1985 ISSUES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 2 (1): 9-10 SINSHEIMER RL PEER-REVIEW AND THE PUBLIC-INTEREST | 1 | 1 |
| 540 | 2 | 8 | 559 1985 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY 5 (4): 220-227 DAS NK; FROEHLICH LA QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION OF PEER-REVIEW OF PROGRAM PROJECT AND CENTER APPLICATIONS IN ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY | 1 | 1 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 541 | 3 | 9 | 565 1985 MINERAL AND ELECTROLYTE METABOLISM 11 (5): 281-286 NOVELLO AC THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - HOW TO PREPARE RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATIONS TO THE NIH | 1 | 7 |
| 542 | 1 | 1 | 570 1985 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 313 (7): 455-455 LAST JM JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 1 |
| 543 | 1 | 10 | 572 1985 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 313 (7): 455-456 SLATER PE JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 1 |
| 544 | 0 | 1 | 599 1986 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 41 (2): 218-218 SURWILLO WW ANONYMOUS REVIEWING AND THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 1 | 7 |
| 545 | 1 | 4 | 606 1986 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 292 (6521): 646-646 MORGAN P PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICAL JOURNALS | 1 | 3 |
| 546 | 2 | 12 | 622 1986 JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES 39 (2): 147-149 KOCHAR MS THE PEER-REVIEW OF MANUSCRIPTS IN NEED FOR IMPROVEMENT | 1 | 10 |
| 547 | 0 | 1 | 624 1986 JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES 31 (3): 803-804 DAVIS JH PEER-REVIEW IN THE COURTROOM | 1 | 3 |
| 548 | 0 | 5 | 642 1986 NURSING OUTLOOK 34 (4): 188-192 DOMBECK MT FACULTY PEER-REVIEW IN A GROUP SETTING | 1 | 1 |
| 549 | 0 | 5 | 657 1987 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 137 (9): 791-792 BARNES WH THE QUESTION OF PEER-REVIEW OF PHYSICIANS PRACTICE BEHAVIOR IN HOSPITAL | 1 | 2 |
| 550 | 0 | 2 | 659 1987 CHEST 92 (5): 958-958 VEVAINA JR RISK-BENEFITS OF PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 1 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 551 | 0 | 0 | 682 1987 JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH 57 (1): 5-6 PIGG RM COMMENTS ON THE JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM | 1 | 1 |
| 552 | 0 | 1 | 684 1987 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE 38 (2): 81-82 KRAFT DF THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS FOR THE JOURNAL-OF-THE-AMERICAN-SOCIETY-FOR-INFORMATION-SCIENCE (JASIS) | 1 | 1 |
| 553 | 0 | 0 | 690 1987 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 316 (15): 960-964 IGLEHART JK CONGRESS MOVES TO BOLSTER PEER-REVIEW - THE HEALTH-CARE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1986 | 1 | 0 |
| 554 | 0 | 1 | 704 1987 SCIENCE 235 (4785): 153-153 WALSH J PEER-REVIEW - OOPS - MERIT REVIEW IN FOR SOME CHANGES AT NSF | 1 | 1 |
| 555 | 1 | 2 | 711 1987 SCIENTIST 1 (12): 10-10 WOLMAN M CAN PEER-REVIEW BE IMPROVED | 1 | 1 |
| 556 | 1 | 2 | 740 1988 DRUG INTELLIGENCE & CLINICAL PHARMACY 22 (12): 1006-1006 SHAUGHNESSY AF BLIND PEER-REVIEW OF JOURNAL ARTICLES - COMMENT | 1 | 2 |
| 557 | 1 | 2 | 749 1988 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 260 (12): 1761-1761 WILLIAMS E THE PROCESS OF PEER-REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPTS | 1 | 2 |
| 558 | 0 | 0 | 763 1988 LANCET 1 (8584): 515-515 [Anon] PEER-REVIEW AND THE LANCET | 1 | 0 |
| 559 | 0 | 0 | 769 1988 PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 82 (3): 516-517 BARDACH J THE CASE FOR PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 2 |
| 560 | 5 | 39 | 771 1988 R & D MANAGEMENT 18 (4): 333-340 POURIS A PEER-REVIEW IN SCIENTIFICALLY SMALL COUNTRIES | 1 | 4 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 561 | 0 | 1 | 800 1989 ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY 125 (2): 285-285 ARNDT KA PEER-REVIEW, THE ARCHIVES, AND BLANK,HARVEY | 1 | 1 |
| 562 | 0 | 0 | 808 1989 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 140 (10): 1123-1123 SQUIRES BP AUTHORS RIGHTS .2. UNDERSTANDING PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 2 |
| 563 | 0 | 0 | 809 1989 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 140 (12): 1427-1427 SQUIRES BP REVIEWING PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 1 |
| 564 | 0 | 5 | 810 1989 CANADIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL-REVUE VETERINAIRE CANADIENNE 30 (5): 377-378 MAXIE G EDITING AND THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 1 | 1 |
| 565 | 0 | 4 | 826 1989 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 261 (5): 695-695 FEINBERG BA PEER-REVIEW AND THE NCI CLINICAL ALERT ON NODE-NEGATIVE BREAST-CANCER | 1 | 1 |
| 566 | 0 | 0 | 842 1989 JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 158 (4): A343-A343 RAMSAY AD; GALLAGHER PJ QUALITY-CONTROL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY BY PEER-REVIEW - THE SOUTHAMPTON EXPERIENCE | 1 | 3 |
| 567 | 0 | 0 | 848 1989 NATURE 339 (6221): 164-164 ANDERSON A PEER-REVIEW - DOES IT WORK EFFICIENTLY | 1 | 3 |
| 568 | 7 | 14 | 867 1989 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 20 (1): 9-16 DEWITT E A LOOK BACKWARD - THE PEER-REVIEW PROGRAM OF THE AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL-ASSOCIATION | 1 | 1 |
| 569 | 0 | 1 | 871 1989 SCIENCE 245 (4915): 250-250 MARSHALL E NSF PEER-REVIEW UNDER FIRE FROM NADER GROUP | 1 | 1 |
| 570 | 0 | 2 | 873 1989 SCIENTIST 3 (16): 13-13 FORSDYKE DR PEER-REVIEW POLICY | 1 | 1 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 571 | 0 | 0 | 888 1990 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 109 (2): 221-223 NEWELL FW PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 1 |
| 572 | 1 | 6 | 899 1990 CURRENT SCIENCE 59 (1): 7-7 GOWRISHANKAR J PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 1 |
| 573 | 0 | 8 | 924 1990 JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION 61 (2): 198-219 WEEKS KM THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - CONFIDENTIALITY AND DISCLOSURE | 1 | 3 |
| 574 | 0 | 0 | 926 1990 JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 227 (6): 363-364 RIIS P THE PEER-REVIEW INSTITUTION | 1 | 1 |
| 575 | 0 | 9 | 932 1990 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE 41 (3): 216-222 ABELSON P MECHANISMS FOR EVALUATING SCIENTIFIC-INFORMATION AND THE ROLE OF PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 2 |
| 576 | 0 | 2 | 936 1990 LABOR LAW JOURNAL 41 (6): 364-369 ROBINSON RK; FRANKLIN GM; ALLEN BM UNIVERSITY-OF-PENNSYLVANIA V EEOC - THE DEMISE OF ACADEMIC-FREEDOM PRIVILEGE IN THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 1 | 1 |
| 577 | 0 | 1 | 943 1990 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 322 (9): 638-638 POLLAK MN EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 1 |
| 578 | 0 | 0 | 945 1990 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 322 (9): 638-639 [Anon] EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - EDITORS REPLY | 1 | 0 |
| 579 | 0 | 0 | 951 1990 SCIENCE 250 (4979): 367-368 CHERFAS J PEER-REVIEW - SOFTWARE FOR HARD CHOICES | 1 | 1 |
| 580 | 0 | 14 | 975 1991 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY 48 (7): 1531-1533 RAINVILLE EC; POSSIDENTE CJ; HARRY DJ A PEER REVIEW-BASED QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM | 1 | 1 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 581 | 0 | 19 | 978 1991 ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND 73 (1): 53-57 PHAIR IC; BARTON DJ; BARNES MR; ALLEN MJ DEATHS FOLLOWING TRAUMA - AN AUDIT OF PERFORMANCE | 1 | 7 |
| 582 | 0 | 0 | 992 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 144-144 DELCOMYN F PEER-REVIEW - EXPLICIT CRITERIA AND TRAINING CAN HELP | 1 | 3 |
| 583 | 1 | 4 | 997 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 157-157 MAHONEY MJ JUSTICE, EFFICIENCY, AND EPISTEMOLOGY IN THE PEER-REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPTS | 1 | 2 |
| 584 | 0 | 1 | 1003 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 166-166 ZENTALL TR WHAT TO DO ABOUT PEER-REVIEW - IS THE CURE WORSE THAN THE DISEASE | 1 | 1 |
| 585 | 0 | 0 | 1005 1991 BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER 63 (2): 168-170 TWENTYMAN P; SELBY P THE PROCESS OF PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 3 |
| 586 | 0 | 0 | 1008 1991 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 302 (6774): 431-431 SMITH R PEER-REVIEW IS OK | 1 | 1 |
| 587 | 0 | 23 | 1026 1991 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT 38 (3): 191-201 KEENEY RL; VONWINTERFELDT D ELICITING PROBABILITIES FROM EXPERTS IN COMPLEX TECHNICAL PROBLEMS | 1 | 45 |
| 588 | 0 | 0 | 1043 1991 JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS 14 (7): 409-415 VERNON H; MIOR S THE NECK DISABILITY INDEX - A STUDY OF RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY | 1 | 191 |
| 589 | 0 | 3 | 1079 1991 SERIALS LIBRARIAN 19 (3-4): 71-73 SCANLAN BD PASSENGERS, DRIVERS, AND TRAFFIC COPS ON PEER-REVIEW ROAD | 1 | 2 |
| 590 | 4 | 12 | 1083 1991 SERIALS LIBRARIAN 19 (3-4): 95-103 WELLER AC POTENTIAL BIAS IN EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - A STUDY OF UNITED-STATES MEDICAL JOURNALS | 1 | 4 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 591 | 0 | 0 | 1087 1991 STATISTICS IN MEDICINE 10 (4): 521-540 KRAKAUER H; BAILEY RC EPIDEMIOLOGIC OVERSIGHT OF THE MEDICAL-CARE PROVIDED TO MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES | 1 | 21 |
| 592 | 0 | 9 | 1102 1992 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY 49 (7): 1681-1688 LOBAS NH; LEPINSKI PW; ABRAMOWITZ PW EFFECTS OF PHARMACEUTICAL CARE ON MEDICATION COST AND QUALITY OF PATIENT-CARE IN AN AMBULATORY-CARE CLINIC | 1 | 54 |
| 593 | 0 | 7 | 1104 1992 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY 49 (11): 2727-2730 CRAM DL; STEBBINS M; EOM HS; RATTO N; SUGIYAMA D PEER-REVIEW AS A QUALITY ASSURANCE MECHANISM IN 3 PHARMACIST-RUN MEDICATION-REFILL CLINICS | 1 | 2 |
| 594 | 1 | 9 | 1106 1992 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 82 (4): 525-527 FELDMAN SE; ROBLIN DW STANDARDS FOR PEER EVALUATION - THE HOSPITAL QUALITY ASSURANCE COMMITTEE | 1 | 3 |
| 595 | 1 | 4 | 1109 1992 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 47 (12): 1679-1681 HOULIHAN D; HOFSCHULTE L; SACHAU D; PATTEN C CRITIQUING THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - EXAMINING A POTENTIAL DUAL ROLE-CONFLICT | 1 | 3 |
| 596 | 0 | 62 | 1115 1992 ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY 26 (5): 701-708 CARTER BL; HELLING DK AMBULATORY CARE PHARMACY SERVICES - THE INCOMPLETE AGENDA | 1 | 24 |
| 597 | 0 | 37 | 1116 1992 APPLIED LINGUISTICS 13 (1): 51-71 JOHNSON DM COMPLIMENTS AND POLITENESS IN PEER-REVIEW TEXTS | 1 | 4 |
| 598 | 0 | 55 | 1117 1992 ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 152 (5): 946-952 WOOLF SH PRACTICE GUIDELINES, A NEW REALITY IN MEDICINE .2. METHODS OF DEVELOPING GUIDELINES | 1 | 253 |
| 599 | 0 | 6 | 1118 1992 ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE 116 (6): 602-604 CONN RB CAN CONTINUING MEDICAL-EDUCATION PREPARE THE CURRENT PRACTITIONER FOR THE 21ST-CENTURY | 1 | 3 |
| 600 | 0 | 0 | 1126 1992 BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION 67 (3): 303-304 SOUTHGATE DAT THE ETHICS OF PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 1 |