Ranked All-Publication list | Historiographs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
View: Overview | Sorted by LCS. |
Page 3 of 38: [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ] 11 21 31
# | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
201 | 1 | 17 | 2257 1999 JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE 14 (9): 551-554 Thomas PA; Gebo KA; Hellmann DB A pilot study of peer review in residency training | 4 | 22 |
202 | 0 | 0 | 2275 1999 LANCET 354 (9178): 577-577 Greenberg DS Washington - Another step towards reshaping peer review at the NIH | 4 | 4 |
203 | 0 | 7 | 2517 2001 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 76 (9): 889-896 Bordage G Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: The strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports | 4 | 17 |
204 | 2 | 33 | 2633 2001 MEDICAL EDUCATION 35: 2-8 Southgate L; Cox Y; David T; Hatch D; Howes A; et al. The assessment of poorly performing doctors: the development of the assessment programmes for the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures | 4 | 16 |
205 | 1 | 25 | 2903 2002 RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION 32 (2): 241-255 Eisenhart M The paradox of peer review: Admitting too much or allowing too little? | 4 | 4 |
206 | 2 | 23 | 3071 2003 MEDICAL EDUCATION 37 (6): 539-543 Norcini JJ Peer assessment of competence | 4 | 19 |
207 | 0 | 17 | 2 1969 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION 79 (6): 1376-& SCHONFEL.HK PEER REVIEW OF QUALITY OF DENTAL CARE | 3 | 9 |
208 | 0 | 3 | 12 1971 NEW YORK STATE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 71 (12): 1544-& DEROUVIL.WH PEER REVIEW IN BILIARY TRACT SURGERY | 3 | 11 |
209 | 0 | 3 | 13 1971 NEW YORK STATE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 71 (16): 1963-& FINE J; MOREHEAD MA STUDY OF PEER REVIEW OF INHOSPITAL PATIENT CARE - WITH AID OF MANUAL | 3 | 18 |
210 | 0 | 0 | 21 1972 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 219 (8): 1060-& SCHLESS JM PEER REVIEW AS AN EDUCATIONAL CHALLENGE | 3 | 7 |
# | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
211 | 0 | 1 | 25 1973 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 130 (3): 301-304 LANGSLEY DG PEER REVIEW - PROSPECTS AND PROBLEMS | 3 | 9 |
212 | 0 | 0 | 103 1975 SCIENCE 188 (4192): 999-1001 WALSH J NSF AND ITS CRITICS IN CONGRESS - NEW PRESSURE ON PEER REVIEW | 3 | 5 |
213 | 0 | 0 | 105 1975 SCIENCE 189 (4200): 331-331 CAREY WD PEER REVIEW REVISITED | 3 | 4 |
214 | 0 | 4 | 198 1978 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING 78 (12): 2094-2096 VENGROSKI SM; SAARMANN L PEER REVIEW IN QUALITY ASSURANCE | 3 | 4 |
215 | 0 | 4 | 280 1980 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 137 (2): 244-245 KASS F; CHARLES E; BUCKLEY P 2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF A PEER-REVIEW TRAINING-PROGRAM FOR RESIDENTS | 3 | 5 |
216 | 0 | 6 | 368 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 205-205 CICCHETTI DV ON PEER-REVIEW - WE HAVE MET THE ENEMY AND HE IS US | 3 | 8 |
217 | 0 | 3 | 369 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 210-211 FLEISS JL DECEPTION IN THE STUDY OF THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 3 | 4 |
218 | 0 | 10 | 376 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 229-230 OVER R WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF BIAS IN PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 6 |
219 | 0 | 0 | 380 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 235-236 ROSENTHAL R RELIABILITY AND BIAS IN PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES | 3 | 3 |
220 | 0 | 0 | 382 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 237-238 SCARR S ANOSMIC PEER-REVIEW - A ROSE BY ANOTHER NAME IS EVIDENTLY NOT A ROSE | 3 | 10 |
# | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
221 | 0 | 22 | 401 1982 HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 17 (2): 113-123 LUKE RD; MODROW RE PROFESSIONALISM, ACCOUNTABILITY AND PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 6 |
222 | 1 | 6 | 419 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 14-18 SECHREST L; HOFFMAN PE THE PHILOSOPHICAL UNDERPINNINGS OF PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 10 |
223 | 3 | 7 | 421 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 50-57 SHUEMAN SA A MODEL SYSTEM OF PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 4 |
224 | 0 | 0 | 429 1982 PSYCHOTHERAPY-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 19 (1): 3-8 DALL OB; CLAIBORN WL AN EVALUATION OF THE AETNA PILOT PEER-REVIEW PROJECT | 3 | 6 |
225 | 0 | 0 | 430 1982 SCIENCE 215 (4528): 11-11 CLARK AH LUCK, MERIT, AND PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 5 |
226 | 0 | 0 | 521 1984 NATURE 312 (5994): 497-497 MADDOX J PRIVACY AND THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM | 3 | 8 |
227 | 0 | 0 | 578 1985 SCIENCE 228 (4706): 1387-1387 KOSHLAND DE PEER-REVIEW OF PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 8 |
228 | 0 | 1 | 602 1986 BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY 21 (1): 1-2 YALOW RS PEER-REVIEW AND SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS | 3 | 4 |
229 | 0 | 1 | 634 1986 NATURE 322 (6074): 24-25 HARNAD S A DIFFICULT BALANCE - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICINE - LOCK,S | 3 | 5 |
230 | 1 | 4 | 689 1987 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 316 (10): 597-598 CURRAN WJ MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW OF PHYSICIAN COMPETENCE AND PERFORMANCE - LEGAL IMMUNITY AND THE ANTITRUST-LAWS | 3 | 10 |
# | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
231 | 2 | 13 | 715 1987 SCIENTOMETRICS 11 (5-6): 333-350 NEDERHOF AJ; VANRAAN AFJ PEER-REVIEW AND BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS OF SCIENTIFIC PERFORMANCE - A COMPARISON OF CUM LAUDE DOCTORATES WITH ORDINARY DOCTORATES IN PHYSICS | 3 | 14 |
232 | 3 | 29 | 736 1988 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 33 (7): 645-649 ELGUEBALY N PEER-REVIEW - EMPIRICAL-DATA BASE AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS | 3 | 5 |
233 | 0 | 27 | 791 1988 VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW 74 (6): 1115-1140 MORTER CS THE HEALTH-CARE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1986 - WILL PHYSICIANS FIND PEER-REVIEW MORE INVITING | 3 | 6 |
234 | 0 | 0 | 814 1989 CURRENT SCIENCE 58 (20): 1114-1116 PRATHAP G A MODEST PROPOSAL FOR GLASNOST IN THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 3 | 3 |
235 | 0 | 0 | 815 1989 FASEB JOURNAL 3 (8): 1987-1992 GREEN JG; CALHOUN F; NIERZWICKI L; BRACKETT J; MEIER P RATING INTERVALS - AN EXPERIMENT IN PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 9 |
236 | 1 | 5 | 828 1989 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 261 (5): 749-749 RENNIE D; KNOLL E; FLANAGIN A THE INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION | 3 | 4 |
237 | 2 | 9 | 859 1989 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 320 (4): 233-235 CURRAN WJ LAW MEDICINE NOTES - LEGAL IMMUNITY FOR MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW PROGRAMS - NEW POLICIES EXPLORED | 3 | 8 |
238 | 1 | 4 | 880 1989 WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 151 (1): 93-96 DIPPE SE; BELL MM; WELLS MA; LYONS W; CLESTER S A PEER-REVIEW OF A PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATION | 3 | 12 |
239 | 0 | 13 | 913 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263 (10): 1427-1430 CANTEKIN EI; MCGUIRE TW; POTTER RL BIOMEDICAL INFORMATION, PEER-REVIEW, AND CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST AS THEY INFLUENCE PUBLIC-HEALTH | 3 | 13 |
240 | 0 | 11 | 989 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 138-138 BORNSTEIN RF THE PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A NEGLECTED ISSUE | 3 | 8 |
# | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
241 | 0 | 34 | 1032 1991 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 265 (6): 752-755 GELLHORN A PERIODIC PHYSICIAN RECREDENTIALING | 3 | 19 |
242 | 0 | 25 | 1151 1992 HIGHER EDUCATION 24 (1): 1-23 WOOD FQ; MEEK VL; HARMAN G THE RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATION PROCESS - LEARNING FROM FAILURE | 3 | 7 |
243 | 0 | 31 | 1209 1992 SRA-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATORS 24 (2): 7-28 EMERY JA; MEYERS HW; HUNTER DE NIH 1ST AWARDS - TESTING BACKGROUND FACTORS FOR FUNDING AGAINST PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 4 |
244 | 5 | 27 | 1253 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306 (6893): 1668-1672 GILLETT R; HARROW J PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .1. MANAGEMENT WITHIN THE MEDICAL-RESEARCH-COUNCIL | 3 | 12 |
245 | 1 | 3 | 1258 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 307 (6900): 382-382 LOCK S THE GROSSEST FAILURES OF PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 3 |
246 | 4 | 19 | 1276 1993 FASEB JOURNAL 7 (8): 619-621 FORSDYKE DR ON GIRAFFES AND PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 7 |
247 | 1 | 51 | 1282 1993 INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING 30 (1): 6-22 THOMAS JW; HOLLOWAY JJ; GUIRE KE VALIDATING RISK-ADJUSTED MORTALITY AS AN INDICATOR FOR QUALITY OF CARE | 3 | 57 |
248 | 0 | 0 | 1293 1993 JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE 8 (5): 255-258 RUBIN HR; REDELMEIER DA; WU AW; STEINBERG EP HOW RELIABLE IS PEER-REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC ABSTRACTS - LOOKING BACK AT THE 1991 ANNUAL-MEETING OF THE SOCIETY OF GENERAL INTERNAL-MEDICINE | 3 | 17 |
249 | 0 | 0 | 1332 1993 SCIENCE 262 (5130): 25-26 TAUBES G PEER-REVIEW GOES UNDER THE MICROSCOPE | 3 | 4 |
250 | 3 | 61 | 1342 1993 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 23 (2): 342-362 CAMPANARIO JM CONSOLATION FOR THE SCIENTIST - SOMETIMES IT IS HARD TO PUBLISH PAPERS THAT ARE LATER HIGHLY-CITED | 3 | 20 |
# | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
251 | 0 | 43 | 1447 1994 MEDICAL CARE 32 (5): 436-446 GUTIERREZ G; GUISCAFRE H; BRONFMAN M; WALSH J; MARTINEZ H; et al. CHANGING PHYSICIAN PRESCRIBING PATTERNS - EVALUATION OF AN EDUCATIONAL STRATEGY FOR ACUTE DIARRHEA IN MEXICO-CITY | 3 | 31 |
252 | 0 | 20 | 1448 1994 MEDICAL CARE 32 (7): JS52-JS64 SONNENBERG FA; ROBERTS MS; TSEVAT J; WONG JB; BARRY M; et al. TOWARD A PEER-REVIEW PROCESS FOR MEDICAL DECISION-ANALYSIS MODELS | 3 | 26 |
253 | 0 | 0 | 1508 1995 AMERICAN SCIENTIST 83 (5): 401-402 GOODSTEIN D PEER-REVIEW AFTER THE BIG CRUNCH | 3 | 7 |
254 | 2 | 14 | 1546 1995 HEALTH ECONOMICS 4 (5): 383-388 JEFFERSON T; DEMICHELI V ARE GUIDELINES FOR PEER-REVIEWING ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS NECESSARY - A SURVEY OF CURRENT EDITORIAL PRACTICE | 3 | 21 |
255 | 26 | 37 | 1554 1995 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS 76: 217-221 MICHELS R PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 4 |
256 | 3 | 10 | 1566 1995 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 10 (3): 255-256 RIGGS JE PRIORITY, RIVALRY, AND PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 5 |
257 | 0 | 8 | 1588 1995 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF LONDON 29 (4): 319-324 PAGE RL; HARRISON BDW SETTING UP INTERDEPARTMENTAL PEER-REVIEW - THE BRITISH-THORACIC-SOCIETY SCHEME | 3 | 8 |
258 | 6 | 40 | 1729 1996 JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 22 (11): 762-769 Goldman RL; Ciesco E Improving peer review: Alternatives to unstructured judgements by a single reviewer | 3 | 5 |
259 | 2 | 34 | 1768 1996 OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 24 (5): 607-612 Jones MJ; Brinn T; Pendlebury M Journal evaluation methodologies: A balanced response | 3 | 7 |
260 | 0 | 0 | 1779 1996 SCIENCE 271 (5245): 20-21 Cohen J AIDS trials take on peer review | 3 | 5 |
# | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
261 | 0 | 25 | 1792 1996 SCIENTOMETRICS 36 (3): 343-362 Martin BR The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research | 3 | 30 |
262 | 9 | 18 | 1881 1997 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 50 (11): 1189-1195 Hodgson C How reliable is peer review? An examination of operating grant proposals simultaneously submitted to two similar peer review systems | 3 | 4 |
263 | 0 | 59 | 1956 1997 STROKE 28 (12): 2382-2389 Brass LM; Krumholz HM; Scinto JM; Radford M Warfarin use among patients with atrial fibrillation | 3 | 107 |
264 | 0 | 16 | 2012 1998 COMPUTERS & EDUCATION 30 (1-2): 111-115 Davies R; Berrow T An evaluation of the use of computer supported peer review for developing higher-level skills | 3 | 6 |
265 | 1 | 1 | 2024 1998 EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 21 (4): 413-418 Weinmann C Quality improvement in health care - A brief history of the Medicare Peer Review Organization (PRO) initiative | 3 | 3 |
266 | 6 | 34 | 2033 1998 HIGHER EDUCATION 35 (4): 435-452 Bazeley P Peer review and panel decisions in the assessment of Australian Research Council project grant applicants: what counts in a highly competitive context? | 3 | 6 |
267 | 3 | 48 | 2043 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 279 (19): 1566-1570 Barnes DE; Bero LA Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions | 3 | 119 |
268 | 0 | 17 | 2058 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280 (16): 1427-1431 Nathan DG Clinical research - Perceptions, reality, and proposed solutions | 3 | 105 |
269 | 0 | 3 | 2136 1998 REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE 126 (2): 135-138 Reyes H The "impact factor" and the impact of medical journals | 3 | 8 |
270 | 0 | 44 | 2150 1998 STATISTICS IN MEDICINE 17 (23): 2661-2674 Altman DG Statistical reviewing for medical journals | 3 | 22 |
# | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
271 | 5 | 32 | 2282 1999 MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH 34 (1): 1-30 Marsh HW; Bazeley P Multiple evaluations of grant proposals by independent assessors: Confirmatory factor analysis evaluations of reliability, validity, and structure | 3 | 4 |
272 | 2 | 4 | 2290 1999 NATURE NEUROSCIENCE 2 (3): 197-198 [Anon] Pros and cons of open peer review | 3 | 0 |
273 | 3 | 33 | 2319 1999 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 29 (5): 765-776 Dirk L A measure of originality: The elements of science | 3 | 3 |
274 | 1 | 3 | 2454 2000 LEARNED PUBLISHING 13 (2): 95-100 Wood D; Hurst P Online peer review: perceptions in the biological sciences | 3 | 5 |
275 | 0 | 3 | 2456 2000 MARINE ECOLOGY-PROGRESS SERIES 192: 305-313 Riisgard HU; Quinn G; Fee E; Larsen PS; Shumway SE; et al. The peer-review system: time for re-assessment? | 3 | 9 |
276 | 5 | 38 | 2458 2000 MEDICAL CARE 38 (2): 152-161 Hofer TP; Bernstein SJ; DeMonner S; Hayward RA Discussion between reviewers does not improve reliability of peer review of hospital quality | 3 | 16 |
277 | 0 | 7 | 2494 2000 SCIENTIST 14 (5): 1-+ Russo E Bypassing peer review | 3 | 0 |
278 | 2 | 14 | 2509 2000 WEB OF KNOWLEDGE - A FESTSCHRIFT IN HONOR OF EUGENE GARFIELD : 301-319 van Raan AFJ The pandora's box of citation analysis: Measuring scientific excellence - The last evil? | 3 | 0 |
279 | 0 | 9 | 2522 2001 ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION 25 (3): 167-175 Guilford WH Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing | 3 | 8 |
280 | 0 | 0 | 2677 2001 SCIENCE 293 (5538): 2187-2188 Enserink M Scientific publishing - Peer review and quality: A dubious connection? | 3 | 3 |
# | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
281 | 5 | 12 | 2727 2002 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 40 (3): 323-328 Callaham ML; Schriger DL Effect of structured workshop training on subsequent performance of journal peer reviewers | 3 | 5 |
282 | 4 | 10 | 2728 2002 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 40 (3): 329-333 Day FC; Schriger DL; Todd C; Wears RL The use of dedicated methodology and statistical reviewers for peer review: A content analysis of comments to authors made by methodology and regular reviewers | 3 | 4 |
283 | 5 | 13 | 2775 2002 CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 43 (3): 286-289 Marusic A; Lukic IK; Marusic M; McNamee D; Sharp D; et al. Peer review in a small and a big medical journal: Case study of the Croatian Medical Journal and The Lancet | 3 | 7 |
284 | 5 | 16 | 2822 2002 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 9 (2): 105-108 Ludbrook J Peer review of manuscripts | 3 | 5 |
285 | 11 | 56 | 2854 2002 LEARNED PUBLISHING 15 (4): 247-258 Rowland F The peer-review process | 3 | 6 |
286 | 2 | 2 | 2878 2002 NURSING RESEARCH 51 (5): 275-275 Tilden V Peer review: Evidence-based or sacred cow? | 3 | 3 |
287 | 0 | 32 | 2901 2002 RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION 32 (2): 191-214 Barton AC; Johnson V Truncating agency: Peer review and participatory research | 3 | 3 |
288 | 0 | 0 | 2968 2003 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 326 (7383): 241-241 White C Little evidence for effectiveness of scientific peer review | 3 | 6 |
289 | 1 | 18 | 3044 2003 JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INQUIRY 12 (4): 331-338 Bedeian AG The manuscript review process - The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors | 3 | 3 |
290 | 6 | 14 | 3149 2004 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 328 (7441): 673-675 Schroter S; Black N; Evans S; Carpenter J; Godlee F; et al. Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial | 3 | 11 |
# | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
291 | 0 | 0 | 3285 2004 REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE 132 (1): 7-10 Reyes H; Palma J; Andresen M The editorial handling of manuscripts submitted to Revista Medica de Chile | 3 | 3 |
292 | 0 | 10 | 7 1971 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE NATIONS HEALTH 61 (10): 2046-& SORICELL.DA PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE IN PEER REVIEW CONTROLLING QUALITY IN DELIVERY OF DENTAL CARE | 2 | 13 |
293 | 0 | 0 | 55 1974 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING 74 (1): 63-67 RAMPHAL M PEER REVIEW | 2 | 6 |
294 | 2 | 4 | 65 1974 HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY 25 (4): 235-238 LEVY A PRIVATE PEER REVIEW FOR FISCAL CONTROL OF PUBLICLY FUNDED PROGRAMS | 2 | 5 |
295 | 4 | 13 | 68 1974 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 230 (8): 1161-1163 COULTER LW PEER REVIEW - TUTOR OR JUDGE | 2 | 5 |
296 | 1 | 10 | 74 1974 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 291 (17): 877-883 BUCK CR; WHITE KL PEER REVIEW - IMPACT OF A SYSTEM BASED ON BILLING CLAIMS | 2 | 30 |
297 | 0 | 0 | 85 1975 AMERICAN SCIENTIST 63 (6): 624-626 BOWERS R PEER REVIEW SYSTEM ON TRIAL | 2 | 4 |
298 | 2 | 11 | 88 1975 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 83 (6): 761-770 GREENFIELD S; LEWIS CE; KAPLAN SH; DAVIDSON MB PEER REVIEW BY CRITERIA MAPPING - CRITERIA FOR DIABETES-MELLITUS - USE OF DECISION-MAKING IN CHART AUDIT | 2 | 90 |
299 | 5 | 15 | 90 1975 HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY 26 (6): 354-358 GREENBLATT M PSROS AND PEER REVIEW - PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES | 2 | 5 |
300 | 0 | 0 | 102 1975 SCIENCE 188 (4185): 204-& WESTHEAD EW PEER REVIEW - DISTRIBUTION OF REVIEWERS | 2 | 2 |