| Ranked All-Publication list | Historiographs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
| View: Overview | Sorted by LCS. |
Page 12 of 38: 1 [ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ] 21 31
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1101 | 0 | 0 | 312 1980 PENNSYLVANIA MEDICINE 83 (11): 15-16 SPEAKER F PEER-REVIEW, FOUNDATION RESTRAINTS SERVE PUBLIC | 0 | 0 |
| 1102 | 0 | 0 | 313 1980 PHARMACY MANAGEMENT 152 (1): 7-8 SIMONSMEIER LM LEGAL RISKS OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1103 | 2 | 18 | 316 1980 SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL 73 (5): 564-568 ROMM FJ; HULKA BS PEER-REVIEW IN DIABETES AND HYPERTENSION - THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CARE PROCESS AND PATIENT OUTCOME | 0 | 8 |
| 1104 | 1 | 1 | 318 1981 ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 141 (1): 20-20 SOFFER A THE UNIQUE ROLE OF PEER-REVIEW JOURNALS | 0 | 1 |
| 1105 | 1 | 3 | 320 1981 AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE 52 (1): 50-52 LEECOOK R NURSING PEER-REVIEW - A SURVEY OF FLIGHT NURSE SECTION MEMBERS | 0 | 0 |
| 1106 | 0 | 6 | 321 1981 BIOSCIENCE 31 (6): 421-421 MOMENT GB RISK MONEY FOR RESEARCH AND THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM | 0 | 4 |
| 1107 | 0 | 0 | 322 1981 BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA 53 (8): 783-784 SPENCE AA SCIENTIFIC WRITING AND PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 3 |
| 1108 | 1 | 3 | 324 1981 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 125 (4): 335-336 VLADUTIU AO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 1 |
| 1109 | 0 | 1 | 325 1981 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 125 (4): 336-336 MORGAN PP PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 1 |
| 1110 | 0 | 0 | 326 1981 CONNECTICUT MEDICINE 45 (3): 191-191 ISELE WP LEGAL UPDATE - A MARYLAND PEER-REVIEW CASE | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1111 | 0 | 1 | 329 1981 IEEE SPECTRUM 18 (9): 14-14 SAIN MK PEER-REVIEW REVIEWED | 0 | 0 |
| 1112 | 0 | 0 | 330 1981 IEEE SPECTRUM 18 (9): 14-14 ESSEL CJ PEER-REVIEW REVIEWED | 0 | 0 |
| 1113 | 0 | 19 | 331 1981 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 246 (7): 754-757 CHOKSHI AB; FRIEDMAN HS; MALACH M; VASAVADA BC; BLEICHER SJ IMPACT OF PEER-REVIEW IN REDUCTION OF PERMANENT PACEMAKER IMPLANTATIONS | 0 | 26 |
| 1114 | 0 | 7 | 332 1981 JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY 152 (1): 78-82 AUSTIN KR; LANGSTON DC PEER-REVIEW - ITS IMPACT ON QUALITY-CONTROL - CPAS AND NON-CPAS VIEWS ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 1 |
| 1115 | 0 | 0 | 334 1981 JOURNAL OF FOOD & NUTRITION 38 (3): 127-130 THOMSON K EVALUATION OF DIETETIC PERFORMANCE DIETETIC AUDIT, PEER-REVIEW AND PERFORMANCE-APPRAISAL PROGRAMS | 0 | 0 |
| 1116 | 0 | 18 | 335 1981 JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW 6 (1): 136-158 HASTINGS DA PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS AND CONFIDENTIALITY - THE QUESTION OF PUBLIC-ACCESS TO MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW DATA THROUGH THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT | 0 | 1 |
| 1117 | 0 | 0 | 336 1981 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRY ASSOCIATION 71 (4): 224-229 DAVIS RH; GIBLEY CW ASSESSING PEER-REVIEW FOR RESEARCH | 0 | 0 |
| 1118 | 0 | 0 | 337 1981 MARYLAND STATE MEDICAL JOURNAL 30 (6): 59-66 TAYLOR B THE PEER-REVIEW COMMITTEE - AN INTERVIEW WITH MCHOLD,DAVID,S. | 0 | 0 |
| 1119 | 0 | 0 | 338 1981 MARYLAND STATE MEDICAL JOURNAL 30 (6): 67-& MCHOLD DS; TOWNSEND C THE CHANGING DEMANDS OF PEER-REVIEW - INTRODUCTION TO THE PEER-REVIEW HANDBOOK | 0 | 0 |
| 1120 | 0 | 23 | 339 1981 MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA 1 (13): 709-711 LEGGE D PEER-REVIEW IN THE USA - AN HISTORICAL-PERSPECTIVE | 0 | 2 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1121 | 1 | 3 | 340 1981 MINNESOTA MEDICINE 64 (6): 355-358 DAVID NB; TUASON VB PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDERS - EXTERNAL PEER-REVIEW OF MEDICAID PATIENTS IN LONG-TERM CARE FACILITIES | 0 | 0 |
| 1122 | 0 | 0 | 341 1981 NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL 93 (676): 45-46 PETTITT GA THE NELSON-BALINT GROUP - EVOLUTION OF ONE POSSIBLE METHOD FOR CONTINUING POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION AND CONSTRUCTIVE PEER-REVIEW IN SMALLER CENTERS | 0 | 1 |
| 1123 | 0 | 0 | 342 1981 OPTICAL SPECTRA 15 (12): 6-6 LAUREN TC REVIEWING THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM ... | 0 | 0 |
| 1124 | 4 | 20 | 343 1981 PEDIATRICS 68 (6): 840-845 GREENE JW; ALTEMEIR WA; MORONEY DM; OCONNOR SM EFFECT OF RESIDENT PEER-REVIEW ON CHARTING BEHAVIOR | 0 | 5 |
| 1125 | 0 | 0 | 345 1981 SCIENCE 212 (4501): 1335-& KALT MR ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1126 | 0 | 1 | 346 1981 SCIENCE 212 (4501): 1335-1335 LIEBMAN JC ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1127 | 0 | 0 | 347 1981 SCIENCE 212 (4501): 1335-1335 MCCREERY RL ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1128 | 0 | 0 | 348 1981 SCIENCE 212 (4501): 1337-1337 EASTER SS ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 2 |
| 1129 | 0 | 0 | 349 1981 SCIENCE 212 (4501): 1337-1337 MORAWETZ H ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1130 | 0 | 0 | 350 1981 SCIENCE 212 (4501): 1337-1337 JACOBS LS ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1131 | 0 | 0 | 351 1981 SCIENCE 212 (4501): 1337-1337 BIRNBAUM HK ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1132 | 0 | 0 | 352 1981 SCIENCE 212 (4501): 1337-1338 BERNS MW ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1133 | 0 | 1 | 355 1981 SCIENCE 214 (4527): 1292-& SINGER IM THE PEER-REVIEW QUESTION | 0 | 1 |
| 1134 | 0 | 2 | 357 1981 SCIENCE 214 (4527): 1294-1294 CRONBACH LJ THE PEER-REVIEW QUESTION | 0 | 0 |
| 1135 | 0 | 1 | 358 1981 TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES 6 (12): R11-R11 KELLENBERGER E ALTERNATIVES TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1136 | 0 | 20 | 359 1982 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE 8 (1): 45-68 VOLPER V ANTITRUST IMPLICATIONS OF CHIROPRACTIC PEER-REVIEW COMMITTEES | 0 | 0 |
| 1137 | 0 | 0 | 361 1982 ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE 10 (1): 70-70 BROWN TCK PEER-REVIEW IN ANESTHESIA | 0 | 0 |
| 1138 | 0 | 0 | 362 1982 ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE 10 (2): 107-107 BROWN TCK PEER-REVIEW IN ANESTHESIA | 0 | 1 |
| 1139 | 1 | 2 | 366 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 203-204 BLISSETT M PEER-REVIEW AND THE STRUCTURE OF KNOWLEDGE | 0 | 0 |
| 1140 | 0 | 1 | 370 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 212-212 GORDON MD COGNITIVE RELATIVISM AND PEER-REVIEW BIAS | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1141 | 0 | 3 | 375 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 227-228 MITROFF II DESIGNING PEER-REVIEW FOR THE SUBJECTIVE AS WELL AS THE OBJECTIVE SIDE OF SCIENCE | 0 | 1 |
| 1142 | 0 | 1 | 379 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 233-234 PORTER AL 2004 - A SCENARIO OF PEER-REVIEW IN THE FUTURE | 0 | 0 |
| 1143 | 0 | 0 | 381 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 236-237 RUBIN DB REJECTION, REBUTTAL, REVISION - SOME FLEXIBLE FEATURES OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1144 | 0 | 3 | 383 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 241-241 WHITE MJ SOME PROCEDURAL OBSCURITIES IN PETERS AND CECIS PEER-REVIEW STUDY | 0 | 0 |
| 1145 | 0 | 0 | 385 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 245-245 ZEAMAN D RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1146 | 0 | 12 | 388 1982 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 152 (4): 137-139 PERKINS PC A PEER-REVIEW PROGRAM IN THE COMMUNITY DENTAL SERVICE | 0 | 1 |
| 1147 | 0 | 3 | 390 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285 (6353): 1501-1501 JACK DB PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 0 | 0 |
| 1148 | 0 | 0 | 391 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285 (6353): 1501-1501 FISKEN RA PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 0 | 0 |
| 1149 | 0 | 2 | 392 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285 (6353): 1501-1501 COTES JE PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 0 | 0 |
| 1150 | 0 | 2 | 393 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285 (6353): 1501-1501 MOFFAT DB PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1151 | 0 | 1 | 394 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285 (6353): 1501-1501 POULTON J PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 0 | 0 |
| 1152 | 1 | 3 | 395 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285 (6355): 1653-1653 SMITH I PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 0 | 0 |
| 1153 | 0 | 0 | 399 1982 CONNECTICUT MEDICINE 46 (8): 463-465 [Anon] PRINCIPLES FOR VOLUNTARY MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW - AN INTERIM-REPORT | 0 | 0 |
| 1154 | 0 | 0 | 400 1982 CONNECTICUT MEDICINE 46 (11): 651-656 SUBER DG PEER-REVIEW - A LEGAL UPDATE - WITH A SUMMARY OF STATE LAWS ON IMMUNITY | 0 | 0 |
| 1155 | 0 | 0 | 402 1982 HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY 33 (10): 803-803 GUILLETTE W EFFECTIVENESS OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1156 | 0 | 0 | 403 1982 HOSPITALS 56 (9): 28-& [Anon] AHA PROPOSES LOCAL PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1157 | 0 | 0 | 404 1982 JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY 153 (6): 30-32 MANN A 4TH ANNUAL PCP CONFERENCE - PEER-REVIEW, AUDITS, STANDARDS OVERLOAD AND TAX DIVISION DISCUSSED | 0 | 0 |
| 1158 | 5 | 12 | 405 1982 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION 57 (6): 481-483 ARONSON M; LAWRENCE R; TAYLOR W; DELBANCO T PEER-REVIEW IN A PRIMARY CARE EDUCATION-PROGRAM | 0 | 1 |
| 1159 | 0 | 0 | 406 1982 JOURNAL OF RESEARCH COMMUNICATION STUDIES 3 (4): 327-334 HORROBIN DF PEER-REVIEW - IS THE GOOD THE ENEMY OF THE BEST | 0 | 1 |
| 1160 | 0 | 0 | 407 1982 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 180 (2): 130-130 RELMAN AS PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1161 | 0 | 9 | 408 1982 MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 28 (4): 439-445 CARDUS D; FUHRER MJ; MARTIN AW; THRALL RM USE OF BENEFIT-COST-ANALYSIS IN THE PEER-REVIEW OF PROPOSED RESEARCH | 0 | 5 |
| 1162 | 1 | 16 | 409 1982 MEDICAL CARE 20 (2): 127-142 DEUSCHLE JM; ALVAREZ B; LOGSDON DN; STAHL WM; SMITH H PHYSICIAN PERFORMANCE IN A PREPAID HEALTH PLAN - RESULTS OF THE PEER-REVIEW PROGRAM OF THE HEALTH-INSURANCE PLAN OF GREATER NEW-YORK | 0 | 5 |
| 1163 | 0 | 0 | 410 1982 MINNESOTA MEDICINE 65 (12): 759-760 HANDLER S IS PEER-REVIEW EFFECTIVE | 0 | 0 |
| 1164 | 0 | 0 | 411 1982 PENNSYLVANIA MEDICINE 85 (11): 18-18 JONES KB ANTITRUST IMPLICATIONS OF PEER-REVIEW OF FEES .2. | 0 | 0 |
| 1165 | 0 | 1 | 412 1982 PHYSICS TODAY 35 (3): 11-13 BOUQUARD ML PEER-REVIEW REVISITED | 0 | 0 |
| 1166 | 0 | 1 | 413 1982 PHYSICS TODAY 35 (3): 13-& ROSE DJ PEER-REVIEW REVISITED | 0 | 0 |
| 1167 | 0 | 1 | 414 1982 PHYSICS TODAY 35 (3): 13-13 WEINBERG AM PEER-REVIEW REVISITED | 0 | 0 |
| 1168 | 0 | 5 | 415 1982 PHYSICS TODAY 35 (3): 15-& VONHIPPEL F PEER-REVIEW REVISITED - REPLY | 0 | 0 |
| 1169 | 0 | 0 | 416 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 4-4 BARCLAY AG SPECIAL ISSUE - PEER-REVIEW AND QUALITY ASSURANCE - FOREWORD | 0 | 0 |
| 1170 | 0 | 0 | 417 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 5-8 STRICKER G; CLAIBORN WL; BENT RJ PEER-REVIEW - AN OVERVIEW | 0 | 3 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1171 | 0 | 7 | 418 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 9-13 YOUNG HH A BRIEF-HISTORY OF QUALITY ASSURANCE AND PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 4 |
| 1172 | 1 | 6 | 422 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 58-65 SHUEMAN SA; TROY WG EDUCATION AND PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 2 |
| 1173 | 0 | 13 | 425 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 125-131 RISLEY TR; SHELDONWILDGEN J INVITED PEER-REVIEW - THE AABT EXPERIENCE | 0 | 0 |
| 1174 | 0 | 0 | 426 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 141-144 MORTON SI PEER-REVIEW - A VIEW FROM WITHIN | 0 | 3 |
| 1175 | 4 | 8 | 427 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (2): 175-180 COHEN LH; HOLSTEIN CM YEAR OF DEGREE AND PSYCHOLOGISTS ATTITUDES TOWARD PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1176 | 0 | 6 | 428 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (4): 517-521 WILSON S PEER-REVIEW IN CALIFORNIA - SUMMARY FINDINGS IN 40 CASES | 0 | 2 |
| 1177 | 0 | 0 | 432 1982 SCIENCE 215 (4531): 344-& WESTLEY J NSF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1178 | 0 | 1 | 433 1982 SCIENCE 215 (4531): 344-344 HUMPHREYS LG NSF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 1 |
| 1179 | 0 | 0 | 434 1982 SCIENCE 215 (4531): 344-344 HOWER J NSF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1180 | 0 | 0 | 436 1982 SCIENCE 215 (4531): 346-346 KYBURG HE NSF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1181 | 0 | 1 | 437 1982 SCIENCE 218 (4573): 636-& DAOUST BG PEER-REVIEW PROBLEMS | 0 | 0 |
| 1182 | 0 | 1 | 438 1982 SCIENCE 218 (4575): 840-840 AASLESTAD HG PEER-REVIEW AT NIH | 0 | 1 |
| 1183 | 0 | 35 | 439 1982 SCIENTOMETRICS 4 (6): 417-430 SNIZEK WE; DUDLEY CJ; HUGHES JE THE 2ND PROCESS OF PEER-REVIEW - SOME CORRELATES OF COMMENTS PUBLISHED IN THE ASR (1947-1979) | 0 | 4 |
| 1184 | 0 | 0 | 440 1982 WEST VIRGINIA MEDICAL JOURNAL 78 (5): 126-126 [Anon] PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1185 | 0 | 8 | 442 1983 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 73 (10): 1182-1185 ADLER NE; MILSTEIN A EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF PHYSICIAN PEER-REVIEW - FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SUCCESSFUL PSROS | 0 | 0 |
| 1186 | 0 | 0 | 444 1983 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 12 (1): 57-57 KROME RL PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1187 | 0 | 0 | 445 1983 ARCHIVES OF SURGERY 118 (1): 17-17 BAUE AE A NEW YEAR AND A NEW LOOK, BUT THE SAME PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 0 | 0 |
| 1188 | 2 | 2 | 446 1983 BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY 70 (11): 697-697 NEGUS D PEER-REVIEW - SHOULD IT BE BLIND | 0 | 0 |
| 1189 | 0 | 1 | 447 1983 BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY 70 (11): 698-698 JAMIESON C PEER-REVIEW - SHOULD IT BE BLIND - REPLY | 0 | 0 |
| 1190 | 0 | 1 | 448 1983 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 286 (6358): 56-56 HOWELLS JG PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1191 | 0 | 1 | 449 1983 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 286 (6358): 56-57 MAHLER R PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 0 | 0 |
| 1192 | 0 | 1 | 450 1983 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 287 (6401): 1306-1306 ROE FJC PEER-REVIEW - HA HA | 0 | 0 |
| 1193 | 0 | 1 | 451 1983 BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY 36 (MAR): 91-91 BELOFF H PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES | 0 | 0 |
| 1194 | 1 | 1 | 452 1983 BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY 36 (JAN): 21-22 MURGATROYD S PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES | 0 | 0 |
| 1195 | 0 | 0 | 454 1983 CLINICAL RESEARCH 31 (5): A872-A872 DESILVA M; MIZE G; RISSING JP ANTIBIOTIC AUDIT BY PEER-REVIEW - POSITIVE IMPACT ON PHYSICIAN PRESCRIBING | 0 | 0 |
| 1196 | 0 | 1 | 455 1983 ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A 15 (4): 432-434 GOULD P THINGS THAT WORRY ME .1. PEER-REVIEW AND CORRECTING ERROR | 0 | 0 |
| 1197 | 0 | 0 | 456 1983 HOSPITALS 57 (18): 31-31 BLOOM MZ PRO RULES CHANGE FOCUS OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1198 | 0 | 0 | 457 1983 HOSPITALS 57 (22): 28-28 MICKEL C AHA, HCFA NEGOTIATE PEER-REVIEW PROGRAM | 0 | 0 |
| 1199 | 0 | 0 | 458 1983 INTERFACES 13 (6): 110-112 ROSENMAN BB MANAGING AN MS OR ACTIVITY BY PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1200 | 0 | 21 | 459 1983 IOWA LAW REVIEW 68 (3): 585-600 WENTZ JA BALANCING ACADEMIC-FREEDOM AND CIVIL-RIGHTS - TOWARD AN APPROPRIATE PRIVILEGE FOR THE VOTES OF ACADEMIC PEER-REVIEW COMMITTEES | 0 | 0 |