HistCite - main:

Ranked All-Publication list

Mon Sep 25 15:45:40 2006

Papers found on Topic Search: "Peer Review"

Collection span: 1969 - 2006

View: Overview

Sorted by LCR.

Page 5 of 38: [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ] 11 21 31

# LCR NCR Node / Date / Journal / Author LCS GCS
401 2 19 603 1986 BIOSCIENCE 36 (1): 18-&
CHUBIN DE
MUCH ADO ABOUT PEER-REVIEW
0 1
402 2 49 612 1986 CURRENT CONTENTS (31): 3-11
GARFIELD E
REFEREEING AND PEER-REVIEW .1. OPINION AND CONJECTURE ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF REFEREEING
0 0
403 2 8 620 1986 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 256 (17): 2391-2392
RENNIE D
GUARDING THE GUARDIANS - A CONFERENCE ON EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW
26 50
404 2 12 622 1986 JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES 39 (2): 147-149
KOCHAR MS
THE PEER-REVIEW OF MANUSCRIPTS IN NEED FOR IMPROVEMENT
1 10
405 2 13 627 1986 JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY 31 (6): 289-295
THOMPSON JE
PEER-REVIEW IN AN AMERICAN-COLLEGE OF NURSE-MIDWIVES LOCAL CHAPTER
2 2
406 2 3 632 1986 LANCET 2 (8516): 1171-1171
[Anon]
PEERING INTO PEER-REVIEW
0 0
407 2 12 645 1986 SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 17 (4): 304-316
LOCK S; SMITH J
PEER-REVIEW AT WORK
0 0
408 2 13 715 1987 SCIENTOMETRICS 11 (5-6): 333-350
NEDERHOF AJ; VANRAAN AFJ
PEER-REVIEW AND BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS OF SCIENTIFIC PERFORMANCE - A COMPARISON OF CUM LAUDE DOCTORATES WITH ORDINARY DOCTORATES IN PHYSICS
3 14
409 2 19 761 1988 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS 38 (306): 10-13
GROL R; MOKKINK H; SCHELLEVIS F
THE EFFECTS OF PEER-REVIEW IN GENERAL-PRACTICE
4 25
410 2 9 859 1989 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 320 (4): 233-235
CURRAN WJ
LAW MEDICINE NOTES - LEGAL IMMUNITY FOR MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW PROGRAMS - NEW POLICIES EXPLORED
3 8
# LCR NCR Node / Date / Journal / Author LCS GCS
411 2 21 892 1990 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 78 (3): 258-265
WELLER AC
EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - METHODOLOGY AND DATA-COLLECTION
0 1
412 2 2 901 1990 CURRENT SCIENCE 59 (10): 492-492
PANDALAI KAV
PEER-REVIEW - REPLY
0 0
413 2 12 1006 1991 BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER 64 (2): 315-320
HARRIS M; HARTLEY AL; BLAIR V; BIRCH JM; BANERJEE SS; et al.
SARCOMAS IN NORTH-WEST ENGLAND .1. HISTOPATHOLOGICAL PEER-REVIEW
2 29
414 2 6 1013 1991 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS 50 (1): 1-3
REIDENBERG JW; REIDENBERG MM
REPORT OF A SURVEY OF SOME ASPECTS OF EDITORIAL-BOARD PEER-REVIEW AT CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY-AND-THERAPEUTICS
2 3
415 2 10 1022 1991 FASEB JOURNAL 5 (9): 2313-2314
FORSDYKE DR
BICAMERAL GRANT REVIEW - AN ALTERNATIVE TO CONVENTIONAL PEER-REVIEW
4 4
416 2 8 1045 1991 JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE 33 (12): 1240-1243
TOMENSON JA; PADDLE GM
BETTER QUALITY STUDIES THROUGH REVIEW OF PROTOCOLS
0 3
417 2 10 1059 1991 NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL 104 (904): 8-10
TRACEY JM
PEER-REVIEW .1. ATTITUDES TO INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL STANDARDS
2 3
418 2 5 1068 1991 RADIOGRAPHICS 11 (4): 529-530
OLMSTED WW
PEER-REVIEW OF RADIOGRAPHICS MANUSCRIPTS - IS IT NEEDED
0 0
419 2 3 1080 1991 SERIALS LIBRARIAN 19 (3-4): 75-85
GIDEZ LI
THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES - A SURVEY OF ATTITUDES, PERCEPTIONS, AND EXPECTATIONS
0 1
420 2 15 1235 1993 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 118 (8): 645-646
FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
WHOS RESPONSIBLE
2 5
# LCR NCR Node / Date / Journal / Author LCS GCS
421 2 9 1242 1993 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 27 (2): 319-323
BEATSON JA
THE PSYCHIATRIST AND PEER-REVIEW - A PSYCHODYNAMIC PERSPECTIVE
1 2
422 2 5 1257 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 307 (6898): 264-265
GILLETT R
MANAGEMENT OF MEDICAL-RESEARCH - MRC SELECTIVELY CRITICIZES PEER-REVIEW
0 0
423 2 6 1328 1993 SCIENCE 259 (5091): 13-13
ROY R
PEER-REVIEW OR PERFORMANCE REVIEW
0 1
424 2 19 1357 1994 ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY 28 (5): 665-670
SLAUGHTER RL; ERICKSON SR; THOMSON PA
CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS PROVIDED BY DOCTOR OF PHARMACY STUDENTS
0 12
425 2 15 1382 1994 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY 56 (1): 1-7
VANHEMEL OJS; ELFERINKSTINKENS PM; BRAND R
HOW TO COMPARE AND REPORT DEPARTMENT SPECIFIC MORTALITY-RATES FOR PEER-REVIEW USING THE PERINATAL DATABASE OF THE NETHERLANDS
2 7
426 2 11 1387 1994 FASEB JOURNAL 8 (10): 679-683
MUSACCHIO JM
AMERICAN SCIENCE IN CRISIS - THE NEED TO REVISE THE NIH FUNDING POLICY
0 3
427 2 28 1390 1994 HIGHER EDUCATION 28 (1): 3-23
RIP A
THE REPUBLIC OF SCIENCE IN THE 1990S
2 14
428 2 31 1404 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272 (2): 92-94
JUDSON HF
STRUCTURAL TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE SCIENCES AND THE END OF PEER-REVIEW
12 26
429 2 19 1432 1994 JOURNAL OF LABORATORY AND CLINICAL MEDICINE 124 (2): 178-182
ERNST E; RESCH KL
REVIEWER BIAS - A BLINDED EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY
11 16
430 2 5 1433 1994 JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE 182 (8): 483-484
BORNSTEIN RF
THE GATEKEEPERS OF PSYCHOLOGY - EVALUATION OF PEER-REVIEW BY CASE-HISTORY - HARCUM,ER, ROSEN,EF
0 0
# LCR NCR Node / Date / Journal / Author LCS GCS
431 2 24 1493 1994 VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW 47 (4): 1175-1203
TAMARELLI AW
DAUBERT V MERRELL-DOW-PHARMACEUTICALS - PUSHING THE LIMITS OF SCIENTIFIC RELIABILITY - THE QUESTIONABLE WISDOM OF ABANDONING THE PEER-REVIEW STANDARD FOR ADMITTING EXPERT TESTIMONY
0 11
432 2 11 1524 1995 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 310 (6984): 920-923
ENTWISTLE V
REPORTING RESEARCH IN MEDICAL JOURNALS AND NEWSPAPERS
1 42
433 2 6 1536 1995 EAST AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 72 (5): 335-337
LORE W
PEER-REVIEW AND REFEREEING IN SCIENCE
1 1
434 2 14 1546 1995 HEALTH ECONOMICS 4 (5): 383-388
JEFFERSON T; DEMICHELI V
ARE GUIDELINES FOR PEER-REVIEWING ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS NECESSARY - A SURVEY OF CURRENT EDITORIAL PRACTICE
3 21
435 2 22 1547 1995 HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 30 (3): 489-506
WEI FF; MARK D; HARTZ A; CAMPBELL C
ARE PRO DISCHARGE SCREENS ASSOCIATED WITH POSTDISCHARGE ADVERSE OUTCOMES
1 8
436 2 4 1557 1995 IRISH VETERINARY JOURNAL 48 (5): 179-179
OCONNOR M
PEER-REVIEW - THE READERS VIEWS
0 0
437 2 10 1577 1995 JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 237 (3): 219-220
ELLIS SJ
PEER-REVIEW AND CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST
0 4
438 2 16 1614 1995 PEDIATRIC NEUROSURGERY 22 (5): 223-227
HUMPHREYS RP; REIGEL DH; EPSTEIN FJ
THE EDITORS LABORS - SEPARATING THE WHEAT FROM THE CHAFF
2 2
439 2 39 1637 1995 SCIENTOMETRICS 32 (2): 195-218
BUCHHOLZ K
CRITERIA FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC QUALITY
0 3
440 2 27 1648 1995 TENSIDE SURFACTANTS DETERGENTS 32 (5): 378-383
Klopffer W; Griesshammer R; Sundstrom G
Overview of the scientific Peer Review of the European Life Cycle Inventory for surfactant production
1 4
# LCR NCR Node / Date / Journal / Author LCS GCS
441 2 11 1657 1996 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION 64 (4): 659-662
Kipp DE; Radel JD; Hogue JA
The Internet and the nutritional scientist
0 8
442 2 38 1668 1996 ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION 15 (1): 57-70
Kupperwasser B
Quality assessment in anaesthesia
0 6
443 2 14 1689 1996 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 84 (3): 359-366
Weller AC
Editorial peer review: A comparison of authors publishing in two groups of US medical journals
0 4
444 2 38 1724 1996 IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE 165 (2): 99-104
Sugrue M; Seger M; Sloane D; Compton J; Hillman K; et al.
Trauma outcomes: A death analysis study
0 15
445 2 66 1734 1996 JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW 21 (3): 515-542
Barnes DE; Bero LA
Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: An analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research
1 55
446 2 11 1738 1996 JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY 41 (5): 401-404
Stein E
Peer review in a New York chapter of the ACNM 1987-1994
0 0
447 2 48 1742 1996 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION 3 (1): 15-26
Grant JB; Hayes RP; Pates RD; Elward KS; Ballard DJ
HCFA's Health Care Quality Improvement Program: The medical informatics challenge
0 17
448 2 32 1745 1996 LANCET 347 (9012): 1382-1386
Altman LK
The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review .1.
6 40
449 2 41 1753 1996 MONIST 79 (4): 536-563
Shatz D
Is peer-review overrated?
1 2
450 2 34 1768 1996 OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 24 (5): 607-612
Jones MJ; Brinn T; Pendlebury M
Journal evaluation methodologies: A balanced response
3 7
# LCR NCR Node / Date / Journal / Author LCS GCS
451 2 29 1907 1997 JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE 42 (5): 810-815
Fallon WF; Barnoski AL; Mancuso CL; Tinnell CA; Malangoni MA
Benchmarking the quality-monitoring process: A comparison of outcomes analysis by trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) methodology with the peer-review process
5 13
452 2 14 1919 1997 NATURE 387 (6631): 341-343
Wenneras C; Wold A
Nepotism and sexism in peer-review
26 129
453 2 75 1926 1997 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 72 (2): 430-469
Washington MJ
The practice of peer review in the international nuclear safety regime
0 0
454 2 130 1970 1998 ACTA CYTOLOGICA 42 (1): 76-119
Frable WJ; Austin RM; Greening SE; Collins RJ; Hillman RL; et al.
Medicolegal affairs - IAC Task Force summary
0 20
455 2 2 1973 1998 ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION 19 (1): S57-S61
Lightfoot JT
A different method of teaching peer review systems
0 0
456 2 5 1980 1998 ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA 86 (2S)
Levine RD; Sugarman M; Schiller W; Weinshel S; Lehning E; et al.
Discussion improves interrater reliability in structured peer review
0 0
457 2 2 1993 1998 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 316 (7125): 86-86
Goldbeck-Wood S
What makes a good reviewer of manuscripts? The BMJ invites you to join its peer review process
8 17
458 2 57 2017 1998 ELECTRONIC LIBRARY 16 (2): 95-104
Schoonbaert D
Biomedical journals and the World Wide Web
0 1
459 2 8 2025 1998 EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 21 (4): 419-428
Fitzgerald ME; Molinari GF; Bausell RB
The empowering potential of quality improvement data
1 2
460 2 22 2027 1998 EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 21 (4): 461-471
Caldwell GG; Berg P; Pritchard C; Lewis JN
Quality improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure by participating Indiana and Kentucky hospitals
0 2
# LCR NCR Node / Date / Journal / Author LCS GCS
461 2 6 2049 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280 (3): 237-240
Godlee F; Gale CR; Martyn CN
Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports - A randomized controlled trial
29 56
462 2 11 2062 1998 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 13 (8): 398-401
Ashwal S; Bale JF; Bauman ML; Cantor HE; Coulter DL; et al.
Child neurologist as expert witness: A report of the ethics and practice committees of the Child Neurology Society
0 0
463 2 21 2072 1998 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION ETHICS 7 (2): 19-29
Moran G
Peer review and academic paradigms - Referees and information ethics
0 0
464 2 65 2081 1998 JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY 14 (5): 559-566
Grimmett MR; Sulmasy DP
The call of the sirens: Ethically navigating the sea of nonvalidated therapies
0 6
465 2 2 2099 1998 LANCET 352 (9133): 1063-1063
Fielder A; Vinyard H
Peer review of grant applications
0 0
466 2 22 2107 1998 LEARNED PUBLISHING 11 (4): 283-292
Harnad S
Learned inquiry and the Net: the role of peer review, peer commentary and copyright
0 4
467 2 32 2112 1998 MILITARY MEDICINE 163 (7): 461-465
Meyer GS; Krakauer H
Validity of the Department of Defense Standard Inpatient Data Record for quality management and health services research
0 8
468 2 34 2128 1998 PHARMACOECONOMICS 14 (3): 251-257
Jefferson T; Demicheli V
Methodological quality of economic modelling studies - A case study with hepatitis B vaccines
0 6
469 2 42 2146 1998 SCIENTOMETRICS 41 (3): 335-355
Thomas PR; Watkins DS
Institutional research rankings via bibliometric analysis and direct peer review: A comparative case study with policy implications
0 5
470 2 3 2191 1999 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 172 (6): 1474-1474
Krinsky G
How to avoid "Unblinding" the peer review process
1 1
# LCR NCR Node / Date / Journal / Author LCS GCS
471 2 32 2221 1999 CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 40 (4): 508-514
Marusic A; Marusic M
Small scientific journals from small countries: Breaking from a vicious circle of inadequacy
5 30
472 2 11 2228 1999 EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY 9 (2): 371-378
Sigal R; Caramella D; Kurdziel JC; Gandon Y; Lemort M; et al.
EURORAD, the EAR database project
0 4
473 2 9 2241 1999 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 281 (18): 1754-1755
Winker MA; Fontanarosa PB
JAMA-EXPRESS: Rapid peer review and publication
0 5
474 2 3 2244 1999 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 282 (11): 1085-1085
Rennie D; Flanagin A; Smith R; Smith J
Fourth international Congress on peer review in biomedical publication: Call for research
0 0
475 2 28 2256 1999 JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE 5 (2): 251-263
Charlton BG
Clinical research methods for the new millennium
0 8
476 2 13 2279 1999 MEDICAL EDUCATION 33 (3): 212-214
Bowrey DJ; Morris-Stiff GJ; Clark GWB; Carey PD; Mansel RE
Peer-reviewed publication following presentation at a regional surgical meeting
0 4
477 2 2 2289 1999 NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY 17 (12): 1146-1146
Fusaro RM
Creativity and peer review
0 1
478 2 4 2290 1999 NATURE NEUROSCIENCE 2 (3): 197-198
[Anon]
Pros and cons of open peer review
3 0
479 2 43 2297 1999 PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN 25 (2): 188-203
Petty RE; Fleming MA
The review process at PSPB: Correlates of interreviewer agreement and manuscript acceptance
0 3
480 2 16 2309 1999 SCHWEIZERISCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT 129 (38): 1354-1362
Genton CY; Bosman FT
Management of quality in histopathology: "from biopsy to diagnosis"
0 3
# LCR NCR Node / Date / Journal / Author LCS GCS
481 2 61 2321 1999 STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE 175 (4): 141-+
Lehrl S
Evaluating scientific performances by impact factors - the right for equal chances
0 20
482 2 46 2335 2000 ACTA CYTOLOGICA 44 (4): 496-507
Mody DR; Davey DD; Branca M; Raab SS; Schenck UG; et al.
Quality assurance and risk reduction guidelines
0 13
483 2 29 2339 2000 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY 15 (3): 106-113
Holmboe ES; Meehan TP; Radford MJ; Wang Y; Krumholz HM
What's happening in quality improvement at the local hospital: A state-wide study from the cooperative cardiovascular project
1 4
484 2 18 2371 2000 CANADIAN PSYCHOLOGY-PSYCHOLOGIE CANADIENNE 41 (3): 152-159
Hadjistavropoulos T; Bieling PJ
When reviews attack: Ethics, free speech, and the peer review process
0 2
485 2 11 2412 2000 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 12 (4): 305-310
Ellerbeck EF; Kresowik TF; Hemann RA; Mason P; Wiblin RT; et al.
Impact of quality improvement activities on care for acute myocardial infarction
0 8
486 2 2 2418 2000 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 283 (7): 886-886
Frable FL
The National Practitioner Data Bank and the quality of peer review
0 0
487 2 27 2463 2000 MILITARY MEDICINE 165 (4): 298-301
Jackson JL; Meyer GS; Pettit T
Complications from cardiac catheterization: Analysis of a military database
0 5
488 2 2 2481 2000 PSYCHOLOGIST 13 (12): 627-627
Martin N
Referee! Two critical reports question the standing of peer review.
0 0
489 2 14 2509 2000 WEB OF KNOWLEDGE - A FESTSCHRIFT IN HONOR OF EUGENE GARFIELD : 301-319
van Raan AFJ
The pandora's box of citation analysis: Measuring scientific excellence - The last evil?
3 0
490 2 2 2548 2001 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 164 (1): 16-16
Harris S; Buchinski B; Grzybowski S; Janssen P; Mitchell GWE; et al.
Induction of labour: a continuous quality improvement and peer review program to improve the quality of care (vol 163, pg 1163, 2000)
0 0
# LCR NCR Node / Date / Journal / Author LCS GCS
491 2 28 2559 2001 CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 42 (5): 500-503
Lukic IK; Marusic M
Appointment of statistical editor and quality of statistics in a small medical journal
0 6
492 2 37 2597 2001 JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING 17 (4): 420-432
Lin SSJ; Liu EZF; Yuan SM
Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles
1 9
493 2 57 2617 2001 JOURNAL OF SPORTS CHIROPRACTIC & REHABILITATION 15 (1): 5-19
Green BN; Johnson CD; Adams A
Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade
0 0
494 2 30 2619 2001 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 91 (4): 210-218
Menz HB
Publication patterns and perceptions of the Australian podiatric medical faculty
1 2
495 2 8 2630 2001 LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH 23 (1): 1-3
Hernon PP; Schwartz CC
Peer review
0 1
496 2 33 2633 2001 MEDICAL EDUCATION 35: 2-8
Southgate L; Cox Y; David T; Hatch D; Howes A; et al.
The assessment of poorly performing doctors: the development of the assessment programmes for the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures
4 16
497 2 36 2634 2001 MEDICAL EDUCATION 35: 9-19
Southgate L; Cox J; David T; Hatch D; Howes A; et al.
The General Medical Council's Performance Procedures: peer review of performance in the workplace
1 13
498 2 9 2672 2001 RESEARCH POLICY 30 (3): 357-361
Rinia EJ; van Leeuwen TN; van Vuren HG; van Raan AFJ
Influence of interdisciplinarity on peer-review and bibliometric evaluations in physics research
1 7
499 2 7 2673 2001 REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE 129 (1): 7-8
Reyes H; Kauffmann R; Andresen M
The International Advisory Committee
1 1
500 2 21 2684 2001 SCIENTOMETRICS 50 (3): 523-537
Hornbostel S
Third party funding of German universities. An indicator of research activity?
1 3

#	LCR	NCR	Node / Date / Journal / Author	LCS	GCS
401	2	19	603 1986 BIOSCIENCE 36 (1): 18-& CHUBIN DE MUCH ADO ABOUT PEER-REVIEW	0	1
402	2	49	612 1986 CURRENT CONTENTS (31): 3-11 GARFIELD E REFEREEING AND PEER-REVIEW .1. OPINION AND CONJECTURE ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF REFEREEING	0	0
403	2	8	620 1986 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 256 (17): 2391-2392 RENNIE D GUARDING THE GUARDIANS - A CONFERENCE ON EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW	26	50
404	2	12	622 1986 JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES 39 (2): 147-149 KOCHAR MS THE PEER-REVIEW OF MANUSCRIPTS IN NEED FOR IMPROVEMENT	1	10
405	2	13	627 1986 JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY 31 (6): 289-295 THOMPSON JE PEER-REVIEW IN AN AMERICAN-COLLEGE OF NURSE-MIDWIVES LOCAL CHAPTER	2	2
406	2	3	632 1986 LANCET 2 (8516): 1171-1171 [Anon] PEERING INTO PEER-REVIEW	0	0
407	2	12	645 1986 SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 17 (4): 304-316 LOCK S; SMITH J PEER-REVIEW AT WORK	0	0
408	2	13	715 1987 SCIENTOMETRICS 11 (5-6): 333-350 NEDERHOF AJ; VANRAAN AFJ PEER-REVIEW AND BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS OF SCIENTIFIC PERFORMANCE - A COMPARISON OF CUM LAUDE DOCTORATES WITH ORDINARY DOCTORATES IN PHYSICS	3	14
409	2	19	761 1988 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS 38 (306): 10-13 GROL R; MOKKINK H; SCHELLEVIS F THE EFFECTS OF PEER-REVIEW IN GENERAL-PRACTICE	4	25
410	2	9	859 1989 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 320 (4): 233-235 CURRAN WJ LAW MEDICINE NOTES - LEGAL IMMUNITY FOR MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW PROGRAMS - NEW POLICIES EXPLORED	3	8
#	LCR	NCR	Node / Date / Journal / Author	LCS	GCS
411	2	21	892 1990 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 78 (3): 258-265 WELLER AC EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - METHODOLOGY AND DATA-COLLECTION	0	1
412	2	2	901 1990 CURRENT SCIENCE 59 (10): 492-492 PANDALAI KAV PEER-REVIEW - REPLY	0	0
413	2	12	1006 1991 BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER 64 (2): 315-320 HARRIS M; HARTLEY AL; BLAIR V; BIRCH JM; BANERJEE SS; et al. SARCOMAS IN NORTH-WEST ENGLAND .1. HISTOPATHOLOGICAL PEER-REVIEW	2	29
414	2	6	1013 1991 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS 50 (1): 1-3 REIDENBERG JW; REIDENBERG MM REPORT OF A SURVEY OF SOME ASPECTS OF EDITORIAL-BOARD PEER-REVIEW AT CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY-AND-THERAPEUTICS	2	3
415	2	10	1022 1991 FASEB JOURNAL 5 (9): 2313-2314 FORSDYKE DR BICAMERAL GRANT REVIEW - AN ALTERNATIVE TO CONVENTIONAL PEER-REVIEW	4	4
416	2	8	1045 1991 JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE 33 (12): 1240-1243 TOMENSON JA; PADDLE GM BETTER QUALITY STUDIES THROUGH REVIEW OF PROTOCOLS	0	3
417	2	10	1059 1991 NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL 104 (904): 8-10 TRACEY JM PEER-REVIEW .1. ATTITUDES TO INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL STANDARDS	2	3
418	2	5	1068 1991 RADIOGRAPHICS 11 (4): 529-530 OLMSTED WW PEER-REVIEW OF RADIOGRAPHICS MANUSCRIPTS - IS IT NEEDED	0	0
419	2	3	1080 1991 SERIALS LIBRARIAN 19 (3-4): 75-85 GIDEZ LI THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES - A SURVEY OF ATTITUDES, PERCEPTIONS, AND EXPECTATIONS	0	1
420	2	15	1235 1993 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 118 (8): 645-646 FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW WHOS RESPONSIBLE	2	5
#	LCR	NCR	Node / Date / Journal / Author	LCS	GCS
421	2	9	1242 1993 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 27 (2): 319-323 BEATSON JA THE PSYCHIATRIST AND PEER-REVIEW - A PSYCHODYNAMIC PERSPECTIVE	1	2
422	2	5	1257 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 307 (6898): 264-265 GILLETT R MANAGEMENT OF MEDICAL-RESEARCH - MRC SELECTIVELY CRITICIZES PEER-REVIEW	0	0
423	2	6	1328 1993 SCIENCE 259 (5091): 13-13 ROY R PEER-REVIEW OR PERFORMANCE REVIEW	0	1
424	2	19	1357 1994 ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY 28 (5): 665-670 SLAUGHTER RL; ERICKSON SR; THOMSON PA CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS PROVIDED BY DOCTOR OF PHARMACY STUDENTS	0	12
425	2	15	1382 1994 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY 56 (1): 1-7 VANHEMEL OJS; ELFERINKSTINKENS PM; BRAND R HOW TO COMPARE AND REPORT DEPARTMENT SPECIFIC MORTALITY-RATES FOR PEER-REVIEW USING THE PERINATAL DATABASE OF THE NETHERLANDS	2	7
426	2	11	1387 1994 FASEB JOURNAL 8 (10): 679-683 MUSACCHIO JM AMERICAN SCIENCE IN CRISIS - THE NEED TO REVISE THE NIH FUNDING POLICY	0	3
427	2	28	1390 1994 HIGHER EDUCATION 28 (1): 3-23 RIP A THE REPUBLIC OF SCIENCE IN THE 1990S	2	14
428	2	31	1404 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272 (2): 92-94 JUDSON HF STRUCTURAL TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE SCIENCES AND THE END OF PEER-REVIEW	12	26
429	2	19	1432 1994 JOURNAL OF LABORATORY AND CLINICAL MEDICINE 124 (2): 178-182 ERNST E; RESCH KL REVIEWER BIAS - A BLINDED EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY	11	16
430	2	5	1433 1994 JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE 182 (8): 483-484 BORNSTEIN RF THE GATEKEEPERS OF PSYCHOLOGY - EVALUATION OF PEER-REVIEW BY CASE-HISTORY - HARCUM,ER, ROSEN,EF	0	0
#	LCR	NCR	Node / Date / Journal / Author	LCS	GCS
431	2	24	1493 1994 VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW 47 (4): 1175-1203 TAMARELLI AW DAUBERT V MERRELL-DOW-PHARMACEUTICALS - PUSHING THE LIMITS OF SCIENTIFIC RELIABILITY - THE QUESTIONABLE WISDOM OF ABANDONING THE PEER-REVIEW STANDARD FOR ADMITTING EXPERT TESTIMONY	0	11
432	2	11	1524 1995 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 310 (6984): 920-923 ENTWISTLE V REPORTING RESEARCH IN MEDICAL JOURNALS AND NEWSPAPERS	1	42
433	2	6	1536 1995 EAST AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 72 (5): 335-337 LORE W PEER-REVIEW AND REFEREEING IN SCIENCE	1	1
434	2	14	1546 1995 HEALTH ECONOMICS 4 (5): 383-388 JEFFERSON T; DEMICHELI V ARE GUIDELINES FOR PEER-REVIEWING ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS NECESSARY - A SURVEY OF CURRENT EDITORIAL PRACTICE	3	21
435	2	22	1547 1995 HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 30 (3): 489-506 WEI FF; MARK D; HARTZ A; CAMPBELL C ARE PRO DISCHARGE SCREENS ASSOCIATED WITH POSTDISCHARGE ADVERSE OUTCOMES	1	8
436	2	4	1557 1995 IRISH VETERINARY JOURNAL 48 (5): 179-179 OCONNOR M PEER-REVIEW - THE READERS VIEWS	0	0
437	2	10	1577 1995 JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 237 (3): 219-220 ELLIS SJ PEER-REVIEW AND CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST	0	4
438	2	16	1614 1995 PEDIATRIC NEUROSURGERY 22 (5): 223-227 HUMPHREYS RP; REIGEL DH; EPSTEIN FJ THE EDITORS LABORS - SEPARATING THE WHEAT FROM THE CHAFF	2	2
439	2	39	1637 1995 SCIENTOMETRICS 32 (2): 195-218 BUCHHOLZ K CRITERIA FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC QUALITY	0	3
440	2	27	1648 1995 TENSIDE SURFACTANTS DETERGENTS 32 (5): 378-383 Klopffer W; Griesshammer R; Sundstrom G Overview of the scientific Peer Review of the European Life Cycle Inventory for surfactant production	1	4
#	LCR	NCR	Node / Date / Journal / Author	LCS	GCS
441	2	11	1657 1996 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION 64 (4): 659-662 Kipp DE; Radel JD; Hogue JA The Internet and the nutritional scientist	0	8
442	2	38	1668 1996 ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION 15 (1): 57-70 Kupperwasser B Quality assessment in anaesthesia	0	6
443	2	14	1689 1996 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 84 (3): 359-366 Weller AC Editorial peer review: A comparison of authors publishing in two groups of US medical journals	0	4
444	2	38	1724 1996 IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE 165 (2): 99-104 Sugrue M; Seger M; Sloane D; Compton J; Hillman K; et al. Trauma outcomes: A death analysis study	0	15
445	2	66	1734 1996 JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW 21 (3): 515-542 Barnes DE; Bero LA Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: An analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research	1	55
446	2	11	1738 1996 JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY 41 (5): 401-404 Stein E Peer review in a New York chapter of the ACNM 1987-1994	0	0
447	2	48	1742 1996 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION 3 (1): 15-26 Grant JB; Hayes RP; Pates RD; Elward KS; Ballard DJ HCFA's Health Care Quality Improvement Program: The medical informatics challenge	0	17
448	2	32	1745 1996 LANCET 347 (9012): 1382-1386 Altman LK The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review .1.	6	40
449	2	41	1753 1996 MONIST 79 (4): 536-563 Shatz D Is peer-review overrated?	1	2
450	2	34	1768 1996 OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 24 (5): 607-612 Jones MJ; Brinn T; Pendlebury M Journal evaluation methodologies: A balanced response	3	7
#	LCR	NCR	Node / Date / Journal / Author	LCS	GCS
451	2	29	1907 1997 JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE 42 (5): 810-815 Fallon WF; Barnoski AL; Mancuso CL; Tinnell CA; Malangoni MA Benchmarking the quality-monitoring process: A comparison of outcomes analysis by trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) methodology with the peer-review process	5	13
452	2	14	1919 1997 NATURE 387 (6631): 341-343 Wenneras C; Wold A Nepotism and sexism in peer-review	26	129
453	2	75	1926 1997 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 72 (2): 430-469 Washington MJ The practice of peer review in the international nuclear safety regime	0	0
454	2	130	1970 1998 ACTA CYTOLOGICA 42 (1): 76-119 Frable WJ; Austin RM; Greening SE; Collins RJ; Hillman RL; et al. Medicolegal affairs - IAC Task Force summary	0	20
455	2	2	1973 1998 ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION 19 (1): S57-S61 Lightfoot JT A different method of teaching peer review systems	0	0
456	2	5	1980 1998 ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA 86 (2S) Levine RD; Sugarman M; Schiller W; Weinshel S; Lehning E; et al. Discussion improves interrater reliability in structured peer review	0	0
457	2	2	1993 1998 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 316 (7125): 86-86 Goldbeck-Wood S What makes a good reviewer of manuscripts? The BMJ invites you to join its peer review process	8	17
458	2	57	2017 1998 ELECTRONIC LIBRARY 16 (2): 95-104 Schoonbaert D Biomedical journals and the World Wide Web	0	1
459	2	8	2025 1998 EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 21 (4): 419-428 Fitzgerald ME; Molinari GF; Bausell RB The empowering potential of quality improvement data	1	2
460	2	22	2027 1998 EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 21 (4): 461-471 Caldwell GG; Berg P; Pritchard C; Lewis JN Quality improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure by participating Indiana and Kentucky hospitals	0	2
#	LCR	NCR	Node / Date / Journal / Author	LCS	GCS
461	2	6	2049 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280 (3): 237-240 Godlee F; Gale CR; Martyn CN Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports - A randomized controlled trial	29	56
462	2	11	2062 1998 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 13 (8): 398-401 Ashwal S; Bale JF; Bauman ML; Cantor HE; Coulter DL; et al. Child neurologist as expert witness: A report of the ethics and practice committees of the Child Neurology Society	0	0
463	2	21	2072 1998 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION ETHICS 7 (2): 19-29 Moran G Peer review and academic paradigms - Referees and information ethics	0	0
464	2	65	2081 1998 JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY 14 (5): 559-566 Grimmett MR; Sulmasy DP The call of the sirens: Ethically navigating the sea of nonvalidated therapies	0	6
465	2	2	2099 1998 LANCET 352 (9133): 1063-1063 Fielder A; Vinyard H Peer review of grant applications	0	0
466	2	22	2107 1998 LEARNED PUBLISHING 11 (4): 283-292 Harnad S Learned inquiry and the Net: the role of peer review, peer commentary and copyright	0	4
467	2	32	2112 1998 MILITARY MEDICINE 163 (7): 461-465 Meyer GS; Krakauer H Validity of the Department of Defense Standard Inpatient Data Record for quality management and health services research	0	8
468	2	34	2128 1998 PHARMACOECONOMICS 14 (3): 251-257 Jefferson T; Demicheli V Methodological quality of economic modelling studies - A case study with hepatitis B vaccines	0	6
469	2	42	2146 1998 SCIENTOMETRICS 41 (3): 335-355 Thomas PR; Watkins DS Institutional research rankings via bibliometric analysis and direct peer review: A comparative case study with policy implications	0	5
470	2	3	2191 1999 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 172 (6): 1474-1474 Krinsky G How to avoid "Unblinding" the peer review process	1	1
#	LCR	NCR	Node / Date / Journal / Author	LCS	GCS
471	2	32	2221 1999 CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 40 (4): 508-514 Marusic A; Marusic M Small scientific journals from small countries: Breaking from a vicious circle of inadequacy	5	30
472	2	11	2228 1999 EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY 9 (2): 371-378 Sigal R; Caramella D; Kurdziel JC; Gandon Y; Lemort M; et al. EURORAD, the EAR database project	0	4
473	2	9	2241 1999 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 281 (18): 1754-1755 Winker MA; Fontanarosa PB JAMA-EXPRESS: Rapid peer review and publication	0	5
474	2	3	2244 1999 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 282 (11): 1085-1085 Rennie D; Flanagin A; Smith R; Smith J Fourth international Congress on peer review in biomedical publication: Call for research	0	0
475	2	28	2256 1999 JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE 5 (2): 251-263 Charlton BG Clinical research methods for the new millennium	0	8
476	2	13	2279 1999 MEDICAL EDUCATION 33 (3): 212-214 Bowrey DJ; Morris-Stiff GJ; Clark GWB; Carey PD; Mansel RE Peer-reviewed publication following presentation at a regional surgical meeting	0	4
477	2	2	2289 1999 NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY 17 (12): 1146-1146 Fusaro RM Creativity and peer review	0	1
478	2	4	2290 1999 NATURE NEUROSCIENCE 2 (3): 197-198 [Anon] Pros and cons of open peer review	3	0
479	2	43	2297 1999 PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN 25 (2): 188-203 Petty RE; Fleming MA The review process at PSPB: Correlates of interreviewer agreement and manuscript acceptance	0	3
480	2	16	2309 1999 SCHWEIZERISCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT 129 (38): 1354-1362 Genton CY; Bosman FT Management of quality in histopathology: "from biopsy to diagnosis"	0	3
#	LCR	NCR	Node / Date / Journal / Author	LCS	GCS
481	2	61	2321 1999 STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE 175 (4): 141-+ Lehrl S Evaluating scientific performances by impact factors - the right for equal chances	0	20
482	2	46	2335 2000 ACTA CYTOLOGICA 44 (4): 496-507 Mody DR; Davey DD; Branca M; Raab SS; Schenck UG; et al. Quality assurance and risk reduction guidelines	0	13
483	2	29	2339 2000 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY 15 (3): 106-113 Holmboe ES; Meehan TP; Radford MJ; Wang Y; Krumholz HM What's happening in quality improvement at the local hospital: A state-wide study from the cooperative cardiovascular project	1	4
484	2	18	2371 2000 CANADIAN PSYCHOLOGY-PSYCHOLOGIE CANADIENNE 41 (3): 152-159 Hadjistavropoulos T; Bieling PJ When reviews attack: Ethics, free speech, and the peer review process	0	2
485	2	11	2412 2000 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 12 (4): 305-310 Ellerbeck EF; Kresowik TF; Hemann RA; Mason P; Wiblin RT; et al. Impact of quality improvement activities on care for acute myocardial infarction	0	8
486	2	2	2418 2000 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 283 (7): 886-886 Frable FL The National Practitioner Data Bank and the quality of peer review	0	0
487	2	27	2463 2000 MILITARY MEDICINE 165 (4): 298-301 Jackson JL; Meyer GS; Pettit T Complications from cardiac catheterization: Analysis of a military database	0	5
488	2	2	2481 2000 PSYCHOLOGIST 13 (12): 627-627 Martin N Referee! Two critical reports question the standing of peer review.	0	0
489	2	14	2509 2000 WEB OF KNOWLEDGE - A FESTSCHRIFT IN HONOR OF EUGENE GARFIELD : 301-319 van Raan AFJ The pandora's box of citation analysis: Measuring scientific excellence - The last evil?	3	0
490	2	2	2548 2001 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 164 (1): 16-16 Harris S; Buchinski B; Grzybowski S; Janssen P; Mitchell GWE; et al. Induction of labour: a continuous quality improvement and peer review program to improve the quality of care (vol 163, pg 1163, 2000)	0	0
#	LCR	NCR	Node / Date / Journal / Author	LCS	GCS
491	2	28	2559 2001 CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 42 (5): 500-503 Lukic IK; Marusic M Appointment of statistical editor and quality of statistics in a small medical journal	0	6
492	2	37	2597 2001 JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING 17 (4): 420-432 Lin SSJ; Liu EZF; Yuan SM Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles	1	9
493	2	57	2617 2001 JOURNAL OF SPORTS CHIROPRACTIC & REHABILITATION 15 (1): 5-19 Green BN; Johnson CD; Adams A Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade	0	0
494	2	30	2619 2001 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 91 (4): 210-218 Menz HB Publication patterns and perceptions of the Australian podiatric medical faculty	1	2
495	2	8	2630 2001 LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH 23 (1): 1-3 Hernon PP; Schwartz CC Peer review	0	1
496	2	33	2633 2001 MEDICAL EDUCATION 35: 2-8 Southgate L; Cox Y; David T; Hatch D; Howes A; et al. The assessment of poorly performing doctors: the development of the assessment programmes for the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures	4	16
497	2	36	2634 2001 MEDICAL EDUCATION 35: 9-19 Southgate L; Cox J; David T; Hatch D; Howes A; et al. The General Medical Council's Performance Procedures: peer review of performance in the workplace	1	13
498	2	9	2672 2001 RESEARCH POLICY 30 (3): 357-361 Rinia EJ; van Leeuwen TN; van Vuren HG; van Raan AFJ Influence of interdisciplinarity on peer-review and bibliometric evaluations in physics research	1	7
499	2	7	2673 2001 REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE 129 (1): 7-8 Reyes H; Kauffmann R; Andresen M The International Advisory Committee	1	1
500	2	21	2684 2001 SCIENTOMETRICS 50 (3): 523-537 Hornbostel S Third party funding of German universities. An indicator of research activity?	1	3

Page 5 of 38: [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ] 11 21 31