Ranked All-Publication list | Historiographs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
View: Overview | Sorted by LCR. |
Page 3 of 38: [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ] 11 21 31
# | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
201 | 4 | 20 | 343 1981 PEDIATRICS 68 (6): 840-845 GREENE JW; ALTEMEIR WA; MORONEY DM; OCONNOR SM EFFECT OF RESIDENT PEER-REVIEW ON CHARTING BEHAVIOR | 0 | 5 |
202 | 4 | 40 | 374 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 221-225 MANWELL C; BAKER CMA REFORM PEER-REVIEW - THE PETERS AND CECI STUDY IN THE CONTEXT OF OTHER CURRENT STUDIES OF SCIENTIFIC EVALUATION | 4 | 7 |
203 | 4 | 8 | 427 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (2): 175-180 COHEN LH; HOLSTEIN CM YEAR OF DEGREE AND PSYCHOLOGISTS ATTITUDES TOWARD PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
204 | 4 | 18 | 526 1984 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 15 (1): 96-108 STRICKER G; COHEN LH APA/CHAMPUS PEER-REVIEW PROJECT - IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH AND PRACTICE | 5 | 6 |
205 | 4 | 10 | 889 1990 ANNALS OF ALLERGY 65 (4): 243-243 SLY RM BLINDING REVIEWERS IMPROVES PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 2 |
206 | 4 | 24 | 902 1990 EVALUATION REVIEW 14 (2): 151-165 LESLIE LZ PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES OF MASS-COMMUNICATION SCHOLARLY JOURNALS | 2 | 3 |
207 | 4 | 37 | 933 1990 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE 41 (3): 223-228 CRAWFORD S; STUCKI L PEER-REVIEW AND THE CHANGING RESEARCH RECORD | 0 | 1 |
208 | 4 | 12 | 1083 1991 SERIALS LIBRARIAN 19 (3-4): 95-103 WELLER AC POTENTIAL BIAS IN EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - A STUDY OF UNITED-STATES MEDICAL JOURNALS | 1 | 4 |
209 | 4 | 21 | 1160 1992 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 267 (17): 2349-2354 RUBIN HR; ROGERS WH; KAHN KL; RUBENSTEIN LV; BROOK RH WATCHING THE DOCTOR-WATCHERS - HOW WELL DO PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATION METHODS DETECT HOSPITAL-CARE QUALITY PROBLEMS | 25 | 105 |
210 | 4 | 28 | 1199 1992 RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT 63 (2): 200-204 MORROW JR; BRAY MS; FULTON JE; THOMAS JR INTERRATER RELIABILITY OF 1987-1991 RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT REVIEWS | 0 | 2 |
# | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
211 | 4 | 22 | 1233 1993 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 118 (7): 550-556 HAYWARD RA; MCMAHON LF; BERNARD AM EVALUATING THE CARE OF GENERAL MEDICINE INPATIENTS - HOW GOOD IS IMPLICIT REVIEW | 18 | 53 |
212 | 4 | 10 | 1247 1993 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 16 (2): 399-400 LUCE RD RELIABILITY IS NEITHER TO BE EXPECTED NOR DESIRED IN PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
213 | 4 | 8 | 1248 1993 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 16 (2): 401-403 CICCHETTI DV THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - ITS LIKE DEJA-VU ALL OVER AGAIN - AUTHORS RESPONSE | 2 | 3 |
214 | 4 | 19 | 1276 1993 FASEB JOURNAL 7 (8): 619-621 FORSDYKE DR ON GIRAFFES AND PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 7 |
215 | 4 | 38 | 1354 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 120 (5): 423-431 AUDET AM; SCOTT HD THE OVERSIGHT OF MEDICAL-CARE - A PROPOSAL FOR REFORM | 0 | 13 |
216 | 4 | 24 | 1356 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121 (1): 60-61 LOCK S DOES EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW WORK | 8 | 12 |
217 | 4 | 14 | 1408 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272 (2): 139-142 GILBERT JR; WILLIAMS ES; LUNDBERG GD IS THERE GENDER BIAS IN JAMAS PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 17 | 31 |
218 | 4 | 8 | 1465 1994 PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM 92 (4): 535-542 MURPHY TM; UTTS JM A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF PEER-REVIEW AT PHYSIOLOGIA-PLANTARUM | 1 | 1 |
219 | 4 | 12 | 1561 1995 JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 21 (5): 227-231 WAKEFIELD DS; HELMS CM THE ROLE OF PEER-REVIEW IN A HEALTH-CARE ORGANIZATION DRIVEN BY TQM/CQI | 2 | 4 |
220 | 4 | 17 | 1565 1995 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 10 (3): 175-176 BRUMBACK RA JUNK SCIENCE - IS PEER-REVIEW THE ANSWER | 0 | 2 |
# | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
221 | 4 | 25 | 1624 1995 RADIOLOGY 196 (1): 219-226 FRIEDMAN DP; ROSETTI GF; FLANDERS AE; PICCOLI CW; RAO VM; et al. MR-IMAGING - QUALITY ASSESSMENT METHOD AND RATINGS AT 33 CENTERS | 0 | 9 |
222 | 4 | 38 | 1667 1996 ANESTHESIOLOGY 85 (5): 1049-1054 Posner KL; Caplan RA; Cheney FW Variation in expert opinion in medical malpractice review | 1 | 15 |
223 | 4 | 38 | 1865 1997 HOSPITAL & HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 42 (4): 489-507 Thomas JW; Guire KE; Horvat GG Is patient length of stay related to quality of care? | 0 | 4 |
224 | 4 | 20 | 1877 1997 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 278 (19): 1573-1578 Smith MA; Atherly AJ; Kane RL; Pacala JT Peer review of the quality of care - Reliability and sources of variability for outcome and process assessments | 8 | 27 |
225 | 4 | 79 | 1948 1997 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 18 (4): 297-319 Kiernan V Ingelfinger, embargoes, and other controls on the dissemination of science news | 0 | 4 |
226 | 4 | 54 | 2000 1998 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 86 (1): 68-76 Kelly JA Scientific meeting abstracts: Significance, access, and trends | 2 | 11 |
227 | 4 | 7 | 2045 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280 (3): 213-213 Rennie D; Flanagin A Congress on Biomedical Peer Review - History, ethics, and plans for the future | 11 | 26 |
228 | 4 | 13 | 2089 1998 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY 32 (7): 2098-2099 Parmley WW What's new in peer review? | 0 | 1 |
229 | 4 | 21 | 2091 1998 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS 187 (2): 123-129 Cornwell EE; Velmahos GC; Berne TV; Tatevossian R; Belzberg H; et al. Lethal abdominal gunshot wounds at a level I trauma center: Analysis of TRISS (Revised Trauma Score and Injury Severity Score) fallouts | 1 | 8 |
230 | 4 | 11 | 2098 1998 LANCET 352 (9126): 441-445 Bingham CM; Higgins G; Coleman R; Van Der Weyden MB The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study | 9 | 20 |
# | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
231 | 4 | 20 | 2122 1998 NURSING ETHICS 5 (5): 451-458 Crigger NJ What we owe the author: Rethinking editorial peer review | 0 | 0 |
232 | 4 | 32 | 2135 1998 RESEARCH POLICY 27 (8): 807-821 Braun D The role of funding agencies in the cognitive development of science | 1 | 7 |
233 | 4 | 39 | 2158 1998 TRANSFUSION SCIENCE 19 (1): 83-90 Renner SW The red blood cell utilization review experience | 0 | 2 |
234 | 4 | 11 | 2199 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318 (7175): 23-27 van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Black N; Smith R Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial | 28 | 41 |
235 | 4 | 10 | 2336 2000 ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION 23 (1): 52-58 Seals DR; Tanaka H Manuscript peer review: A helpful checklist for students and novice referees | 2 | 8 |
236 | 4 | 13 | 2346 2000 ANESTHESIOLOGY 92 (5): 1497-1498 Lagasse RS The purpose of peer review - Reply | 0 | 0 |
237 | 4 | 8 | 2364 2000 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 176: 47-51 Walsh E; Rooney M; Appleby L; Wilkinson G Open peer review: a randomised controlled trial | 11 | 17 |
238 | 4 | 13 | 2406 2000 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 12 (3): 169-175 Shaw CD External quality mechanisms for health care: summary of the ExPeRT project on visitatie, accreditation, EFQM and ISO assessment in European Union countries | 7 | 23 |
239 | 4 | 14 | 2474 2000 OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 28 (2): 241-245 Ormerod RJ Is content analysis either practical or desirable for research evaluation? | 0 | 2 |
240 | 4 | 15 | 2530 2001 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 182 (2): 103-109 Livingston EH; Harwell JD Peer review | 0 | 1 |
# | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
241 | 4 | 29 | 2577 2001 INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE REVIEWS 26 (2): 97-102 Berezin AA Discouragement of innovation by overcompetitive research funding | 0 | 0 |
242 | 4 | 29 | 2629 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14 (4): 273-285 Shum SB; Sumner T JIME: an interactive journal for interactive media (Reprinted from First Monday, vol 6, 2001) | 0 | 0 |
243 | 4 | 12 | 2648 2001 NURSE EDUCATION TODAY 21 (3): 238-242 Burnard P; Hannigan B Reviewing the review process: towards good practice in the peer review of manuscripts submitted to nursing journals | 1 | 5 |
244 | 4 | 10 | 2728 2002 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 40 (3): 329-333 Day FC; Schriger DL; Todd C; Wears RL The use of dedicated methodology and statistical reviewers for peer review: A content analysis of comments to authors made by methodology and regular reviewers | 3 | 4 |
245 | 4 | 25 | 2731 2002 ANNALS OF SURGERY 236 (3): 277-287 Rangel SJ; Efron B; Moss RL Recent trends in National Institutes of Health funding of surgical research | 0 | 8 |
246 | 4 | 29 | 2756 2002 CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN 48: 1337-1344 Goulet F; Jacques A; Gagnon R; Bourbeau D; Laberge D; et al. Performance assessment - Family physicians in Montreal meet the mark! | 0 | 0 |
247 | 4 | 15 | 2783 2002 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY 102 (1): 21-30 Elferink-Stinkens PM; Brand R; Amelink-Verburg MP; Merkus JMWM; den Ouden AL; et al. Randomised clinical trial on the effect of the Dutch obstetric peer review system | 0 | 0 |
248 | 4 | 25 | 2816 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287 (21): 2843-2847 Horton R Postpublication criticism and the shaping of clinical knowledge | 2 | 14 |
249 | 4 | 10 | 2939 2003 ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION 27 (2): 47-52 Benos DJ; Kirk KL; Hall JE How to review a paper | 1 | 6 |
250 | 4 | 5 | 2969 2003 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 326 (7389): 563-564 Rennie D; Flanagin A; Smith R; Smith J Fifth international congress on peer review and biomedical publication - Call for research | 0 | 0 |
# | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
251 | 4 | 27 | 2987 2003 CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK JOURNAL 31 (3): 295-313 Naiburg S Mentors at the gate: Editors talk about clinical writing for journal publication | 0 | 2 |
252 | 4 | 5 | 3024 2003 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 289 (11): 1438-1438 Rennie D; Flanagin A; Smith R; Smith J Fifth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication - Call for research | 2 | 3 |
253 | 4 | 23 | 3073 2003 MEDICINA CLINICA 121 (6): 228-230 Bosch F; Guardiola E Abridged checklist for the evaluation of basic biomedical research papers | 0 | 1 |
254 | 4 | 37 | 3122 2004 ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY 11 (12): 1381-1388 Grunewald M; Heckemann RA; Wagner M; Bautz WA; Greess H ELERA: A WWW application for evaluating and developing radiologic skills and knowledge | 0 | 3 |
255 | 4 | 11 | 3141 2004 BIOSCIENCE 54 (3): 234-239 Cassey P; Blackburn TM Publication and rejection among successful ecologists | 1 | 2 |
256 | 4 | 18 | 3154 2004 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE 51 (6): 549-556 Turcotte C; Drolet P; Girard M Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal | 2 | 3 |
257 | 4 | 9 | 3235 2004 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION 11 (1): 87-88 Johnson KB; Miller RA The JAMIA student editorial board: Peer review education in biomedical Informatics | 0 | 0 |
258 | 4 | 40 | 3278 2004 QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE 13 (5): 356-362 Macfarlane F; Greenhalgh T; Schofield T; Desombre T RCGP quality team development programme: an illuminative evaluation | 1 | 2 |
259 | 4 | 18 | 3290 2004 SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL 25: S29-S33 Etemadi A; Raiszadeh F; Alaeddini F; Azizi F Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication | 0 | 1 |
260 | 4 | 235 | 3372 2005 CLADISTICS 21 (5): 446-494 Prendini L; Wheeler WC Scorpion higher phylogeny and classification, taxonomic anarchy, and standards for peer review in online publishing | 0 | 2 |
# | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
261 | 4 | 28 | 3516 2005 SCIENTOMETRICS 62 (1): 133-143 Van Raan AFJ Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods | 1 | 11 |
262 | 4 | 31 | 3518 2005 SCIENTOMETRICS 64 (2): 133-150 Lozano S; Salmeron JL Data envelopment analysis of OR/MS journals | 0 | 0 |
263 | 4 | 9 | 3550 2006 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 48 (3): 304-308 Green SM; Callaham ML Current status of peer review at Annals of Emergency Medicine | 0 | 1 |
264 | 4 | 8 | 3584 2006 FIELD CROPS RESEARCH 95 (2-3): 431-432 Weiss A Peer review and scientific journals | 0 | 0 |
265 | 4 | 4 | 3647 2006 MEDICAL EDUCATION 40 (9): 830-831 Morrison J The case for open peer review | 0 | 0 |
266 | 4 | 24 | 3662 2006 NEUROCIRUGIA 17 (2): 89-97 Lobato RD; Gonzalez P; Gomez PA; Alday R; Lagares A; et al. The change in the editorial process of Neurocirugia, the journal of the Spanish Neurosurgical Society | 0 | 0 |
267 | 4 | 21 | 3681 2006 REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA 40: 30-35 Szklo M Quality of scientific articles | 0 | 0 |
268 | 4 | 65 | 3705 2006 SCIENTOMETRICS 67 (2): 213-230 Garcia-Aracil A; Gracia AG; Perez-Marin M Analysis of the evaluation process of the research performance: An empirical case | 0 | 0 |
269 | 3 | 3 | 231 1979 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 136 (4): 444-447 ALLEN MG PEER-REVIEW OF GROUP-THERAPY - WASHINGTON, DC, 1972-1977 | 4 | 7 |
270 | 3 | 7 | 253 1979 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION 54 (7): 578-580 SLOANE P; LESSNE S; BORDEN S PEER-REVIEW BY RESIDENTS | 1 | 3 |
# | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
271 | 3 | 50 | 317 1980 SPECULATIONS IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 3 (5): 533-562 RUDERFER M THE FALLACY OF PEER-REVIEW - JUDGMENT WITHOUT SCIENCE AND A CASE-HISTORY | 4 | 9 |
272 | 3 | 5 | 344 1981 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 12 (6): 776-784 COHEN LH PEER-REVIEW OF PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY OF THE APA-CHAMPUS PROGRAM | 5 | 9 |
273 | 3 | 60 | 363 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 187-195 PETERS DP; CECI SJ PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNALS - THE FATE OF ACCEPTED, PUBLISHED ARTICLES, SUBMITTED AGAIN | 68 | 250 |
274 | 3 | 19 | 397 1982 BULLETIN OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY 2 (5): 423-432 CHUBIN DE PEER-REVIEW AND THE COURTS - NOTES OF A PARTICIPANT SCIENTIST | 1 | 4 |
275 | 3 | 7 | 421 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 50-57 SHUEMAN SA A MODEL SYSTEM OF PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 4 |
276 | 3 | 11 | 431 1982 SCIENCE 215 (4530): 240-240 CHUBIN DE REFORM OF PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 1 |
277 | 3 | 15 | 499 1984 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 39 (4): 406-414 THEAMAN M THE IMPACT OF PEER-REVIEW ON PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | 4 | 5 |
278 | 3 | 24 | 529 1984 SCIENTOMETRICS 6 (6): 433-443 SCHUBERT A; ZSINDELY S; TELCS A; BRAUN T QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF A VISIBLE TIP OF THE PEER-REVIEW ICEBERG - BOOK REVIEWS IN CHEMISTRY | 0 | 5 |
279 | 3 | 9 | 565 1985 MINERAL AND ELECTROLYTE METABOLISM 11 (5): 281-286 NOVELLO AC THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - HOW TO PREPARE RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATIONS TO THE NIH | 1 | 7 |
280 | 3 | 20 | 658 1987 CHEST 91 (2): 252-255 ROBIN ED; BURKE CM PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICAL JOURNALS | 11 | 15 |
# | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
281 | 3 | 9 | 729 1988 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN 142 (4): 427-428 RENNIE D; KNOLL E RESEARCH INTO EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - AN INVITATION TO A CONGRESS | 0 | 0 |
282 | 3 | 27 | 735 1988 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 296 (6624): 774-777 SMITH R RESEARCH POLICY - PROBLEMS WITH PEER-REVIEW AND ALTERNATIVES | 7 | 17 |
283 | 3 | 29 | 736 1988 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 33 (7): 645-649 ELGUEBALY N PEER-REVIEW - EMPIRICAL-DATA BASE AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS | 3 | 5 |
284 | 3 | 15 | 907 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263 (10): 1330-1332 KNOLL E THE COMMUNITIES OF SCIENTISTS AND JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW | 7 | 12 |
285 | 3 | 28 | 1122 1992 BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER 66 (4): 685-691 HARTLEY AL; BLAIR V; HARRIS M; BIRCH JM; BANERJEE SS; et al. SARCOMAS IN NORTH-WEST ENGLAND .3. SURVIVAL | 0 | 7 |
286 | 3 | 39 | 1159 1992 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 267 (7): 958-960 GOLDMAN RL THE RELIABILITY OF PEER ASSESSMENTS OF QUALITY OF CARE | 36 | 127 |
287 | 3 | 19 | 1164 1992 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS 11 (2): 95-104 CARLAND JA; CARLAND JW; ABY CD PROPOSED CODIFICATION OF ETHICACY IN THE PUBLICATION PROCESS | 0 | 4 |
288 | 3 | 10 | 1181 1992 MEDICINA CLINICA 98 (8): 304-305 LOCK S PEER-REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PAPERS | 0 | 4 |
289 | 3 | 24 | 1223 1993 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 160 (2): 409-411 CHEW FS MANUSCRIPT PEER-REVIEW - GENERAL CONCEPTS AND THE AJR PROCESS | 4 | 5 |
290 | 3 | 122 | 1227 1993 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 48 (9): 972-983 GARDNER W; WILCOX BL POLITICAL INTERVENTION IN SCIENTIFIC PEER-REVIEW - RESEARCH ON ADOLESCENT SEXUAL-BEHAVIOR | 0 | 20 |
# | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
291 | 3 | 5 | 1231 1993 ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION IN ENGLISH 32 (7): 1030-1030 ROSS PF CONCERNING AN EVALUATION OF THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS AT ANGEWANDTE-CHEMIE | 0 | 0 |
292 | 3 | 32 | 1234 1993 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 118 (7): 566-568 DANS PE CLINICAL PEER-REVIEW - BURNISHING A TARNISHED ICON | 1 | 6 |
293 | 3 | 17 | 1245 1993 AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION 37 (3): 219-230 POOLE M REVIEWING FOR RESEARCH EXCELLENCE - EXPECTATIONS, PROCEDURES AND OUTCOMES | 0 | 1 |
294 | 3 | 61 | 1342 1993 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 23 (2): 342-362 CAMPANARIO JM CONSOLATION FOR THE SCIENTIST - SOMETIMES IT IS HARD TO PUBLISH PAPERS THAT ARE LATER HIGHLY-CITED | 3 | 20 |
295 | 3 | 49 | 1397 1994 INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING 31 (1): 40-55 IEZZONI LI; DALEY J; HEEREN T; FOLEY SM; HUGHES JS; et al. USING ADMINISTRATIVE DATA TO SCREEN HOSPITALS FOR HIGH COMPLICATION RATES | 2 | 73 |
296 | 3 | 36 | 1430 1994 JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION 65 (3): 298-309 FOX MF SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT AND EDITORIAL AND PEER-REVIEW PROCESSES | 0 | 5 |
297 | 3 | 11 | 1460 1994 NURSING & HEALTH CARE 15 (3): 142-148 FONDILLER SH EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - IS NURSING AT RISK | 1 | 5 |
298 | 3 | 27 | 1509 1995 ANESTHESIOLOGY 82 (5): 1181-1188 LAGASSE RS; STEINBERG ES; KATZ RI; SAUBERMANN AJ DEFINING QUALITY OF PERIOPERATIVE CARE BY STATISTICAL PROCESS-CONTROL OF ADVERSE OUTCOMES | 5 | 43 |
299 | 3 | 5 | 1559 1995 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 273 (2): 114-115 GELLERT GA EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
300 | 3 | 10 | 1566 1995 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 10 (3): 255-256 RIGGS JE PRIORITY, RIVALRY, AND PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 5 |