| Ranked All-Publication list | Historiographs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
| View: Overview | Sorted by LCR. |
Page 2 of 38: [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ] 11 21 31
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | 7 | 83 | 2186 1999 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE 25 (1): 7-60 Scheutzow SO State medical peer review: High cost but no benefit - Is it time for a change? | 5 | 11 |
| 102 | 7 | 18 | 2581 2001 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 13 (5): 357-365 Weingart SN; Mukamal K; Davis RB; Davies DT; Palmer RH; et al. Physician-reviewers' perceptions and judgments about quality of care | 0 | 0 |
| 103 | 7 | 10 | 2808 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287 (21): 2759-2760 Rennie D Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication | 13 | 28 |
| 104 | 7 | 20 | 2960 2003 ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH 34 (5): 439-443 Kljakovic-Gaspic M; Hren D; Marusic A; Marusic M Peer review time: How late is late in a small medical journal? | 2 | 3 |
| 105 | 7 | 24 | 3378 2005 CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 46 (2): 326-332 Marusic M; Sambunjak D; Marusic A Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal | 0 | 1 |
| 106 | 7 | 39 | 3498 2005 RESEARCH EVALUATION 14 (1): 15-20 Bornmann L; Daniel HD Committee peer review at an international research foundation: predictive validity and fairness of selection decisions on post-graduate fellowship applications | 1 | 1 |
| 107 | 7 | 15 | 3605 2006 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 295 (14): 1675-1680 Ross JS; Gross CP; Desai MM; Hong YL; Grant AO; et al. Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance | 1 | 2 |
| 108 | 7 | 30 | 3635 2006 JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE 61 (1): 135-141 Jacobs DG; Sarafin JL; Huynh T; Miles WS; Sing RF; et al. Audience response system technology improves accuracy and reliability of trauma outcome judgments | 0 | 0 |
| 109 | 6 | 22 | 389 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285 (6350): 1224-1226 LOCK S PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 5 | 17 |
| 110 | 6 | 11 | 904 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263 (10): 1317-1317 RENNIE D EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION - THE 1ST-INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS | 29 | 49 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 111 | 6 | 22 | 1074 1991 SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES 16 (3): 322-341 TRAVIS GDL; COLLINS HM NEW LIGHT ON OLD BOYS - COGNITIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL PARTICULARISM IN THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM | 7 | 17 |
| 112 | 6 | 11 | 1167 1992 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY 14 (6): 976-980 CICCHETTI DV; ROURKE BP; WASS P PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - RELEVANCE FOR RESEARCH IN CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY | 1 | 2 |
| 113 | 6 | 9 | 1411 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272 (2): 152-153 SWEITZER BJ; CULLEN DJ HOW WELL DOES A JOURNALS PEER-REVIEW PROCESS FUNCTION - A SURVEY OF AUTHORS OPINIONS | 9 | 14 |
| 114 | 6 | 11 | 1526 1995 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 311 (7009): 826-826 SMITH R; RENNIE D AND NOW, EVIDENCE BASED EDITING - THE 3RD CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW WILL BE IN PRAGUE IN SEPTEMBER 1997 | 0 | 7 |
| 115 | 6 | 17 | 1676 1996 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 30 (5): 643-652 Beatson J; Rushford N; Halasz G; Lancaster J; Prager S Group peer review: A questionnaire-based survey | 1 | 2 |
| 116 | 6 | 103 | 1721 1996 INTERFACES 26 (4): 25-55 Armstrong JS; Arkes HR; Franke RH; Peterson RA; Armstrong JS The Ombudsman: Management folklore and management science - On portfolio planning, escalation bias, and such | 2 | 7 |
| 117 | 6 | 15 | 1725 1996 ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 32 (7): 573-575 Beritic T Medical reviews and the importance of being a ''peer'' in science | 0 | 0 |
| 118 | 6 | 40 | 1729 1996 JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 22 (11): 762-769 Goldman RL; Ciesco E Improving peer review: Alternatives to unstructured judgements by a single reviewer | 3 | 5 |
| 119 | 6 | 34 | 2033 1998 HIGHER EDUCATION 35 (4): 435-452 Bazeley P Peer review and panel decisions in the assessment of Australian Research Council project grant applicants: what counts in a highly competitive context? | 3 | 6 |
| 120 | 6 | 32 | 2242 1999 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 282 (4): 349-355 Baldwin LM; Hart LG; Oshel RE; Fordyce MA; Cohen R; et al. Hospital peer review and the National Practitioner Data Bank - Clinical privileges action reports | 4 | 10 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 121 | 6 | 18 | 2449 2000 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE 93 (4): 164-167 Resch KI; Ernst E; Garrow J A randomized controlled study of reviewer bias against an unconventional therapy | 5 | 13 |
| 122 | 6 | 39 | 2459 2000 MEDICAL CARE 38 (8): 796-806 Weingart SN; Iezzoni LI; Davis RB; Palmer RH; Cahalane M; et al. Use of administrative data to find substandard care - Validation of the complications screening program | 2 | 55 |
| 123 | 6 | 69 | 2460 2000 MEDICAL CARE 38 (11): 1074-1091 Pearson ML; Lee JL; Chang BL; Elliott M; Kahn KL; et al. Structured implicit review - A new method for monitoring nursing care quality | 2 | 9 |
| 124 | 6 | 19 | 2628 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14 (4): 257-263 Wager E; Jefferson T Shortcomings of peer review in biomedical journals | 1 | 2 |
| 125 | 6 | 69 | 2660 2001 PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER 53 (4): 511-521 Berg LD Masculinism, emplacement, and positionality in peer review | 0 | 19 |
| 126 | 6 | 29 | 2679 2001 SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 7 (2): 193-204 Atkinson M 'Peer review' culture | 0 | 0 |
| 127 | 6 | 11 | 2740 2002 AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL 80 (10): 604-605 Revington ML Peer review - What is it? Why use it? | 0 | 3 |
| 128 | 6 | 22 | 3074 2003 MEDICINA CLINICA 121 (18): 690-694 Arnau C; Cobo E; Ribera JM; Cardellach F; Selva A; et al. Effect of statistical review on manuscript quality in Medicina Clinica (Barcelona): a randomized study | 0 | 3 |
| 129 | 6 | 35 | 3145 2004 BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 4: Art. No. 9 Hofer TP; Asch SM; Hayward RA; Rubenstein LV; Hogan MM; et al. Profiling quality of care: Is there a role for peer review? | 0 | 1 |
| 130 | 6 | 14 | 3149 2004 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 328 (7441): 673-675 Schroter S; Black N; Evans S; Carpenter J; Godlee F; et al. Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial | 3 | 11 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 131 | 6 | 13 | 3342 2005 ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 165 (22): 2559-2560 Emanuel LL; Greenland P Peer review and professionalism at the Archives of Internal Medicine | 0 | 0 |
| 132 | 6 | 38 | 3414 2005 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT 13 (4): 296-303 Bornmann L; Daniel HD Criteria used by a peer review committee for selection of research fellows - A boolean probit analysis | 0 | 0 |
| 133 | 6 | 12 | 3467 2005 MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 51 (4): 655-661 Cook WD; Golany B; Kress M; Penn M; Raviv T Optimal allocation of proposals to reviewers to facilitate effective ranking | 0 | 0 |
| 134 | 6 | 15 | 3548 2006 ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA 102 (5): 1501-1503 Cohen IT; Patel K Peer review interrater concordance of scientific abstracts: A study of anesthesiology subspecialty and component societies | 0 | 0 |
| 135 | 6 | 19 | 3579 2006 EMBO REPORTS 7 (6): 567-570 Grivell L Through a glass darkly - The present and the future of editorial peer review | 0 | 0 |
| 136 | 6 | 32 | 3651 2006 MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA 184 (12): 621-626 Lee KP; Boyd EA; Holroyd-Leduc JM; Bacchetti P; Bero LA Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals | 0 | 0 |
| 137 | 6 | 18 | 3676 2006 PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE 17 (5): 378-382 Blackburn JL; Hakel MD An examination of sources of peer-review bias | 0 | 0 |
| 138 | 5 | 15 | 90 1975 HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY 26 (6): 354-358 GREENBLATT M PSROS AND PEER REVIEW - PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES | 2 | 5 |
| 139 | 5 | 19 | 327 1981 HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 16 (3): 267-275 EICHHORN RL; MAURANA CA PEER-REVIEW IN HEALTH-SERVICES RESEARCH - ISSUES AND PROBLEMS | 1 | 1 |
| 140 | 5 | 7 | 360 1982 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 72 (3): 239-240 YANKAUER A EDITORS REPORT - PEER-REVIEW AGAIN | 5 | 8 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 141 | 5 | 12 | 405 1982 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION 57 (6): 481-483 ARONSON M; LAWRENCE R; TAYLOR W; DELBANCO T PEER-REVIEW IN A PRIMARY CARE EDUCATION-PROGRAM | 0 | 1 |
| 142 | 5 | 10 | 483 1983 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 14 (1): 57-66 PIZZIRUSSO D; COHEN LH PSYCHOLOGISTS EVALUATIONS OF PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY - A PEER-REVIEW ANALOG EXPERIMENT | 2 | 4 |
| 143 | 5 | 18 | 605 1986 BIOSCIENCE 36 (9): 607-609 CRANDALL R PEER-REVIEW - IMPROVING EDITORIAL PROCEDURES | 0 | 13 |
| 144 | 5 | 39 | 771 1988 R & D MANAGEMENT 18 (4): 333-340 POURIS A PEER-REVIEW IN SCIENTIFICALLY SMALL COUNTRIES | 1 | 4 |
| 145 | 5 | 14 | 911 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263 (10): 1371-1376 MCNUTT RA; EVANS AT; FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON THE QUALITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL | 56 | 111 |
| 146 | 5 | 19 | 1225 1993 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES 305 (4): 222-228 LEFEVRE F; FEINGLASS J; YARNOLD PR; MARTIN GJ; WEBSTER J USE OF THE RAND STRUCTURED IMPLICIT REVIEW INSTRUMENT FOR QUALITY OF CARE ASSESSMENT | 1 | 2 |
| 147 | 5 | 20 | 1236 1993 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 119 (12): 1209-1213 AUDET AM; SCOTT HD THE UNIFORM CLINICAL-DATA SET - AN EVALUATION OF THE PROPOSED NATIONAL DATABASE FOR MEDICARES QUALITY REVIEW PROGRAM | 4 | 24 |
| 148 | 5 | 27 | 1253 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306 (6893): 1668-1672 GILLETT R; HARROW J PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .1. MANAGEMENT WITHIN THE MEDICAL-RESEARCH-COUNCIL | 3 | 12 |
| 149 | 5 | 27 | 1254 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306 (6893): 1672-1675 GILLETT R; HARROW J PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .2. IS MEDICAL-RESEARCH WELL-SERVED BY PEER-REVIEW | 4 | 13 |
| 150 | 5 | 5 | 1370 1994 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 309 (6953): 538-538 REDFERN SAT PROMOTING RESEARCH INTO PEER-REVIEW - NO QUICK FIXES | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 151 | 5 | 67 | 1383 1994 EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 17 (1): 3-21 GOLDMAN RL THE RELIABILITY OF PEER ASSESSMENTS - A METAANALYSIS | 8 | 12 |
| 152 | 5 | 14 | 1405 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272 (2): 96-97 KASSIRER JP; CAMPION EW PEER-REVIEW - CRUDE AND UNDERSTUDIED, BUT INDISPENSABLE | 38 | 59 |
| 153 | 5 | 25 | 1409 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272 (2): 143-146 FISHER M; FRIEDMAN SB; STRAUSS B THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON ACCEPTANCE OF RESEARCH PAPERS BY PEER-REVIEW | 30 | 50 |
| 154 | 5 | 9 | 1535 1995 CURRENT SCIENCE 69 (5): 393-395 KARTHA CC PEER-REVIEW UNDER SCRUTINY | 0 | 0 |
| 155 | 5 | 47 | 1581 1995 JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY 40 (6): 555-569 Morales ME; Maliszewski S; Greenlees M In pursuit of excellence - Quality assurance, documentation, and peer review by home birth CNMs | 0 | 1 |
| 156 | 5 | 13 | 1681 1996 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 19 (3): 534-& Cicchetti DV Peer review: Agreement and disagreement - Response | 0 | 1 |
| 157 | 5 | 21 | 1703 1996 CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS 17 (1): 1-12 Jadad AR; Moore RA; Carroll D; Jenkinson C; Reynolds DJM; et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? | 8 | 1447 |
| 158 | 5 | 20 | 1711 1996 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY 68 (1-2): 97-103 ElferinkStinkens PM; Brand R; leCessie S; VanHemel OJS Large differences in obstetrical intervention rates among Dutch hospitals, even after adjustment for population differences | 2 | 12 |
| 159 | 5 | 73 | 1843 1997 CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS 40 (1): 21-32 Heupler FA; Chambers CE; Dear WE; Angello DA; Heisler M Guidelines for internal peer review in the cardiac catheterization laboratory | 0 | 3 |
| 160 | 5 | 10 | 1887 1997 JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME 22A (5): 767-771 Manske PR A review of peer review | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 161 | 5 | 34 | 1888 1997 JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2 (1): 3-15 Wilkes MS The public dissemination of medical research: Problems and solutions | 0 | 20 |
| 162 | 5 | 10 | 1983 1998 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 128 (1): 66-68 Davidoff F Masking, blinding, and peer review: The blind leading the blinded | 9 | 19 |
| 163 | 5 | 31 | 2133 1998 RESEARCH POLICY 27 (1): 95-107 Rinia EJ; van Leeuwen TN; van Vuren HG; van Raan AFJ Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria - Evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands | 5 | 19 |
| 164 | 5 | 32 | 2282 1999 MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH 34 (1): 1-30 Marsh HW; Bazeley P Multiple evaluations of grant proposals by independent assessors: Confirmatory factor analysis evaluations of reliability, validity, and structure | 3 | 4 |
| 165 | 5 | 7 | 2320 1999 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 89 (4): 397-401 Good CD; Parente ST; Rennie D; Fletcher SW A worldwide assessment of medical journal editors' practices and needs results of a survey by the World Association of Medical Editors | 1 | 4 |
| 166 | 5 | 36 | 2447 2000 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE 51 (14): 1328-1333 Weller AC Editorial peer review for electronic journals: Current issues and emerging models | 2 | 5 |
| 167 | 5 | 38 | 2458 2000 MEDICAL CARE 38 (2): 152-161 Hofer TP; Bernstein SJ; DeMonner S; Hayward RA Discussion between reviewers does not improve reliability of peer review of hospital quality | 3 | 16 |
| 168 | 5 | 69 | 2573 2001 HEALTH POLICY 58 (3): 191-213 Lombarts MJMH; Klazinga NS A policy analysis of the introduction and dissemination of external peer review (visitatie) as a means of professional self-regulation amongst medical specialists in The Netherlands in the period 1985-2000 | 1 | 5 |
| 169 | 5 | 20 | 2587 2001 JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE 82 (12): 1719-1722 Arrive L; Dono P; Lewin M; Dahan H; Monnier-Cholley L; et al. Publication rate of papers originally presented at the National French Congress of Radiology in 1996 | 0 | 4 |
| 170 | 5 | 20 | 2608 2001 JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE 49 (1): 77-84 Bovier PA; Guillain H; Perneger TV Productivity of medical research in Switzerland | 0 | 3 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 171 | 5 | 15 | 2625 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14 (2): 85-91 van Rooyen S The evaluation of peer-review quality | 2 | 2 |
| 172 | 5 | 12 | 2727 2002 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 40 (3): 323-328 Callaham ML; Schriger DL Effect of structured workshop training on subsequent performance of journal peer reviewers | 3 | 5 |
| 173 | 5 | 13 | 2775 2002 CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 43 (3): 286-289 Marusic A; Lukic IK; Marusic M; McNamee D; Sharp D; et al. Peer review in a small and a big medical journal: Case study of the Croatian Medical Journal and The Lancet | 3 | 7 |
| 174 | 5 | 10 | 2813 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287 (21): 2790-2793 Weber EJ; Katz PP; Waeckerle JF; Callahan ML Author perception of peer review - Impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction | 8 | 12 |
| 175 | 5 | 16 | 2822 2002 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 9 (2): 105-108 Ludbrook J Peer review of manuscripts | 3 | 5 |
| 176 | 5 | 15 | 2912 2002 SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 8 (1): 99-108 Spier RE Peer review and innovation | 1 | 2 |
| 177 | 5 | 40 | 2959 2003 ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 163 (15): 1813-1820 Isetts BJ; Brown LM; Schondelmeyer SW; Lenarz LA Quality assessment of a collaborative approach for decreasing drug-related morbidity and achieving therapeutic goals | 0 | 4 |
| 178 | 5 | 54 | 2984 2003 CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA 333 (2): 115-124 Shaw CD Measuring against clinical standards | 0 | 0 |
| 179 | 5 | 31 | 3045 2003 JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INQUIRY 12 (4): 344-351 Starbuck WH Turning lemons into lemonade - Where is the value in peer reviews? | 2 | 6 |
| 180 | 5 | 15 | 3050 2003 JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY & NEUROSCIENCE 28 (5): 327-330 Young SN Peer review of manuscripts: theory and practice | 0 | 3 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 181 | 5 | 15 | 3064 2003 LEARNED PUBLISHING 16 (1): 15-20 Williamson A What will happen to peer review? | 1 | 4 |
| 182 | 5 | 10 | 3069 2003 MARINE ECOLOGY-PROGRESS SERIES 258: 297-309 Riisgard HU; Kinne O; Fenchel T; Fee E; Hesslein R; et al. Misuse of the peer-review system: time for countermeasures? | 1 | 7 |
| 183 | 5 | 36 | 3070 2003 MEDICAL DECISION MAKING 23 (1): 31-37 Bindels R; Hasman A; van Wersch JWJ; Pop PR; Winkens RAG The reliability of assessing the appropriateness of requested diagnostic tests | 0 | 2 |
| 184 | 5 | 58 | 3131 2004 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW 69 (2): 190-212 Guetzkow J; Lamont M; Mallard G What is originality in the humanities and the social sciences? | 0 | 1 |
| 185 | 5 | 18 | 3337 2005 ANTHROZOOS 18 (2): 175-182 Herzog HA; Podberscek AL; Docherty A The reliability of peer review in anthrozoology | 0 | 0 |
| 186 | 5 | 12 | 3379 2005 CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 46 (6): 875-878 Linkov F; LaPorte R; Lovalekar M; Dodani S Web quality control for lectures: Supercourse and Amazon.com | 0 | 0 |
| 187 | 5 | 28 | 3395 2005 HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 40 (2): 459-476 Bradley EH; Carlson MDA; Gallo WT; Scinto J; Campbell MK; et al. From adversary to partner: Have quality improvement organizations made the transition? | 0 | 4 |
| 188 | 5 | 17 | 3441 2005 JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP 37 (1): 87-94 Freda MC; Kearney M An international survey of nurse editors' roles and practices | 1 | 1 |
| 189 | 5 | 6 | 3494 2005 PLOS BIOLOGY 3 (9): Art. No. e326 Mainguy G; Motamedi MR; Mietchen D Peer review - The newcomers' perspective | 1 | 1 |
| 190 | 5 | 6 | 3509 2005 SCIENTIST 19 (11): 10-10 Kaplan D How to fix peer review | 0 | 3 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 191 | 5 | 8 | 3532 2005 TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY 32 (4): 259-261 White TL; Kirby BJ 'Tis better to give than to receive: An undergraduate peer review project | 0 | 0 |
| 192 | 5 | 42 | 3539 2006 ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL 49 (3): 425-431 Miller CC Peer review in the organizational and management sciences: Prevalence and effects of reviewer hostility, bias, and dissensus | 0 | 0 |
| 193 | 5 | 18 | 3596 2006 HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES 51 (2): 357-363 Kundzewicz ZW; Koutsoyiannis D Pathologies, improvements and optimism - Reply to discussions of "Editorial - The peer review system: prospects and challenges" | 0 | 0 |
| 194 | 5 | 18 | 3622 2006 JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL ISSUES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND PRACTICE 132 (1): 24-28 Godoy LA Differences between experts and novices in the review of engineering journal papers | 0 | 0 |
| 195 | 4 | 13 | 68 1974 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 230 (8): 1161-1163 COULTER LW PEER REVIEW - TUTOR OR JUDGE | 2 | 5 |
| 196 | 4 | 20 | 100 1975 PEDIATRICS 56 (2): 246-254 RUSSO RM; GURURAJ VJ; LAUDE TA; RAJKUMAR SV; VENTRE SA CHART AUDIT PEER REVIEW SYSTEM IN AN AMBULATORY SERVICE | 1 | 10 |
| 197 | 4 | 42 | 127 1976 MEDICAL CARE 14 (12): 1-122 BROOK RH; WILLIAMS KN EVALUATION OF NEW-MEXICO PEER REVIEW SYSTEM 1971 TO 1973 | 1 | 34 |
| 198 | 4 | 4 | 146 1977 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 134 (6): 637-641 WILKINSON CB; REUS VI EXAMINATION OF FEDERAL PSYCHIATRIC-TRAINING GRANT PEER REVIEW PROCESS | 1 | 2 |
| 199 | 4 | 22 | 275 1979 SEARCH 10 (3): 81-86 MANWELL C PEER-REVIEW - CASE HISTORY FROM THE AUSTRALIAN-RESEARCH-GRANTS-COMMITTEE | 2 | 10 |
| 200 | 4 | 7 | 291 1980 CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY-A JOURNAL OF REVIEWS 9 (2): 204-207 CHUBIN DE PEER-REVIEW IN THE NATIONAL-SCIENCE-FOUNDATION - PHASE ONE OF A STUDY - COLE,S, RUBIN,L, COLE,JR | 5 | 7 |