| Ranked All-Publication list | Historiographs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
| View: Overview | Sorted by LCR. |
Page 14 of 38: 1 [ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ] 21 31
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1301 | 0 | 0 | 352 1981 SCIENCE 212 (4501): 1337-1338 BERNS MW ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1302 | 0 | 6 | 353 1981 SCIENCE 212 (4501): 1338-1339 ROY R ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW - REPLY | 1 | 2 |
| 1303 | 0 | 1 | 355 1981 SCIENCE 214 (4527): 1292-& SINGER IM THE PEER-REVIEW QUESTION | 0 | 1 |
| 1304 | 0 | 2 | 357 1981 SCIENCE 214 (4527): 1294-1294 CRONBACH LJ THE PEER-REVIEW QUESTION | 0 | 0 |
| 1305 | 0 | 1 | 358 1981 TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES 6 (12): R11-R11 KELLENBERGER E ALTERNATIVES TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1306 | 0 | 20 | 359 1982 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE 8 (1): 45-68 VOLPER V ANTITRUST IMPLICATIONS OF CHIROPRACTIC PEER-REVIEW COMMITTEES | 0 | 0 |
| 1307 | 0 | 0 | 361 1982 ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE 10 (1): 70-70 BROWN TCK PEER-REVIEW IN ANESTHESIA | 0 | 0 |
| 1308 | 0 | 0 | 362 1982 ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE 10 (2): 107-107 BROWN TCK PEER-REVIEW IN ANESTHESIA | 0 | 1 |
| 1309 | 0 | 0 | 364 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 196-196 ADAIR RK A PHYSICS EDITOR COMMENTS ON PETERS AND CECIS PEER-REVIEW STUDY | 2 | 10 |
| 1310 | 0 | 0 | 365 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 200-201 BELSHAW C PEER-REVIEW AND THE CURRENT-ANTHROPOLOGY EXPERIENCE | 1 | 5 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1311 | 0 | 6 | 368 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 205-205 CICCHETTI DV ON PEER-REVIEW - WE HAVE MET THE ENEMY AND HE IS US | 3 | 8 |
| 1312 | 0 | 3 | 369 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 210-211 FLEISS JL DECEPTION IN THE STUDY OF THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 3 | 4 |
| 1313 | 0 | 1 | 370 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 212-212 GORDON MD COGNITIVE RELATIVISM AND PEER-REVIEW BIAS | 0 | 0 |
| 1314 | 0 | 4 | 371 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 216-217 HONIG WM PEER-REVIEW IN THE PHYSICAL SCIENCES - AN EDITORS VIEW | 1 | 3 |
| 1315 | 0 | 0 | 372 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 217-218 HORROBIN DF PEER-REVIEW - A PHILOSOPHICALLY FAULTY CONCEPT WHICH IS PROVING DISASTROUS FOR SCIENCE | 9 | 20 |
| 1316 | 0 | 3 | 375 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 227-228 MITROFF II DESIGNING PEER-REVIEW FOR THE SUBJECTIVE AS WELL AS THE OBJECTIVE SIDE OF SCIENCE | 0 | 1 |
| 1317 | 0 | 10 | 376 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 229-230 OVER R WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF BIAS IN PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 6 |
| 1318 | 0 | 0 | 377 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 230-231 PALERMO DS BIASES, DECISIONS AND AUCTORIAL REBUTTAL IN THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 1 | 2 |
| 1319 | 0 | 3 | 378 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 232-233 PERLOFF RM; PERLOFF R IMPROVING RESEARCH ON AND POLICIES FOR PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES | 2 | 5 |
| 1320 | 0 | 1 | 379 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 233-234 PORTER AL 2004 - A SCENARIO OF PEER-REVIEW IN THE FUTURE | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1321 | 0 | 0 | 380 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 235-236 ROSENTHAL R RELIABILITY AND BIAS IN PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES | 3 | 3 |
| 1322 | 0 | 0 | 381 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 236-237 RUBIN DB REJECTION, REBUTTAL, REVISION - SOME FLEXIBLE FEATURES OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1323 | 0 | 0 | 382 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 237-238 SCARR S ANOSMIC PEER-REVIEW - A ROSE BY ANOTHER NAME IS EVIDENTLY NOT A ROSE | 3 | 10 |
| 1324 | 0 | 3 | 383 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 241-241 WHITE MJ SOME PROCEDURAL OBSCURITIES IN PETERS AND CECIS PEER-REVIEW STUDY | 0 | 0 |
| 1325 | 0 | 0 | 384 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 242-243 WILSON WA RESEARCH ON PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES - PROBLEMS OF INTERPRETATION, APPLICATION, AND PROPRIETY | 1 | 5 |
| 1326 | 0 | 0 | 385 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 245-245 ZEAMAN D RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1327 | 0 | 0 | 387 1982 BIOSCIENCE 32 (1): 10-12 BODDE T EVALUATION OF PEER-REVIEW DRAWS MIXED REACTIONS | 1 | 1 |
| 1328 | 0 | 12 | 388 1982 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 152 (4): 137-139 PERKINS PC A PEER-REVIEW PROGRAM IN THE COMMUNITY DENTAL SERVICE | 0 | 1 |
| 1329 | 0 | 3 | 390 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285 (6353): 1501-1501 JACK DB PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 0 | 0 |
| 1330 | 0 | 0 | 391 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285 (6353): 1501-1501 FISKEN RA PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1331 | 0 | 2 | 392 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285 (6353): 1501-1501 COTES JE PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 0 | 0 |
| 1332 | 0 | 2 | 393 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285 (6353): 1501-1501 MOFFAT DB PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 0 | 0 |
| 1333 | 0 | 1 | 394 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285 (6353): 1501-1501 POULTON J PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 0 | 0 |
| 1334 | 0 | 0 | 398 1982 CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS 60 (11): 32-43 SANDERS HJ PEER-REVIEW - HOW WELL IS IT WORKING | 4 | 4 |
| 1335 | 0 | 0 | 399 1982 CONNECTICUT MEDICINE 46 (8): 463-465 [Anon] PRINCIPLES FOR VOLUNTARY MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW - AN INTERIM-REPORT | 0 | 0 |
| 1336 | 0 | 0 | 400 1982 CONNECTICUT MEDICINE 46 (11): 651-656 SUBER DG PEER-REVIEW - A LEGAL UPDATE - WITH A SUMMARY OF STATE LAWS ON IMMUNITY | 0 | 0 |
| 1337 | 0 | 22 | 401 1982 HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 17 (2): 113-123 LUKE RD; MODROW RE PROFESSIONALISM, ACCOUNTABILITY AND PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 6 |
| 1338 | 0 | 0 | 402 1982 HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY 33 (10): 803-803 GUILLETTE W EFFECTIVENESS OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1339 | 0 | 0 | 403 1982 HOSPITALS 56 (9): 28-& [Anon] AHA PROPOSES LOCAL PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1340 | 0 | 0 | 404 1982 JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY 153 (6): 30-32 MANN A 4TH ANNUAL PCP CONFERENCE - PEER-REVIEW, AUDITS, STANDARDS OVERLOAD AND TAX DIVISION DISCUSSED | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1341 | 0 | 0 | 406 1982 JOURNAL OF RESEARCH COMMUNICATION STUDIES 3 (4): 327-334 HORROBIN DF PEER-REVIEW - IS THE GOOD THE ENEMY OF THE BEST | 0 | 1 |
| 1342 | 0 | 0 | 407 1982 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 180 (2): 130-130 RELMAN AS PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1343 | 0 | 9 | 408 1982 MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 28 (4): 439-445 CARDUS D; FUHRER MJ; MARTIN AW; THRALL RM USE OF BENEFIT-COST-ANALYSIS IN THE PEER-REVIEW OF PROPOSED RESEARCH | 0 | 5 |
| 1344 | 0 | 0 | 410 1982 MINNESOTA MEDICINE 65 (12): 759-760 HANDLER S IS PEER-REVIEW EFFECTIVE | 0 | 0 |
| 1345 | 0 | 0 | 411 1982 PENNSYLVANIA MEDICINE 85 (11): 18-18 JONES KB ANTITRUST IMPLICATIONS OF PEER-REVIEW OF FEES .2. | 0 | 0 |
| 1346 | 0 | 1 | 412 1982 PHYSICS TODAY 35 (3): 11-13 BOUQUARD ML PEER-REVIEW REVISITED | 0 | 0 |
| 1347 | 0 | 1 | 413 1982 PHYSICS TODAY 35 (3): 13-& ROSE DJ PEER-REVIEW REVISITED | 0 | 0 |
| 1348 | 0 | 1 | 414 1982 PHYSICS TODAY 35 (3): 13-13 WEINBERG AM PEER-REVIEW REVISITED | 0 | 0 |
| 1349 | 0 | 5 | 415 1982 PHYSICS TODAY 35 (3): 15-& VONHIPPEL F PEER-REVIEW REVISITED - REPLY | 0 | 0 |
| 1350 | 0 | 0 | 416 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 4-4 BARCLAY AG SPECIAL ISSUE - PEER-REVIEW AND QUALITY ASSURANCE - FOREWORD | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1351 | 0 | 0 | 417 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 5-8 STRICKER G; CLAIBORN WL; BENT RJ PEER-REVIEW - AN OVERVIEW | 0 | 3 |
| 1352 | 0 | 7 | 418 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 9-13 YOUNG HH A BRIEF-HISTORY OF QUALITY ASSURANCE AND PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 4 |
| 1353 | 0 | 0 | 420 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 23-26 WILLENS J; DELEON PH POLITICAL ASPECTS OF PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 3 |
| 1354 | 0 | 2 | 424 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 105-111 LASSEN CL THE COLORADO MEDICARE STUDY - PERSPECTIVE OF THE PEER-REVIEW COMMITTEE | 1 | 2 |
| 1355 | 0 | 13 | 425 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 125-131 RISLEY TR; SHELDONWILDGEN J INVITED PEER-REVIEW - THE AABT EXPERIENCE | 0 | 0 |
| 1356 | 0 | 0 | 426 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (1): 141-144 MORTON SI PEER-REVIEW - A VIEW FROM WITHIN | 0 | 3 |
| 1357 | 0 | 6 | 428 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13 (4): 517-521 WILSON S PEER-REVIEW IN CALIFORNIA - SUMMARY FINDINGS IN 40 CASES | 0 | 2 |
| 1358 | 0 | 0 | 429 1982 PSYCHOTHERAPY-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 19 (1): 3-8 DALL OB; CLAIBORN WL AN EVALUATION OF THE AETNA PILOT PEER-REVIEW PROJECT | 3 | 6 |
| 1359 | 0 | 0 | 430 1982 SCIENCE 215 (4528): 11-11 CLARK AH LUCK, MERIT, AND PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 5 |
| 1360 | 0 | 0 | 432 1982 SCIENCE 215 (4531): 344-& WESTLEY J NSF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1361 | 0 | 1 | 433 1982 SCIENCE 215 (4531): 344-344 HUMPHREYS LG NSF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 1 |
| 1362 | 0 | 0 | 434 1982 SCIENCE 215 (4531): 344-344 HOWER J NSF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1363 | 0 | 4 | 435 1982 SCIENCE 215 (4531): 346-& COLE S; COLE JR; SIMON GA NSF PEER-REVIEW | 2 | 2 |
| 1364 | 0 | 0 | 436 1982 SCIENCE 215 (4531): 346-346 KYBURG HE NSF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1365 | 0 | 1 | 437 1982 SCIENCE 218 (4573): 636-& DAOUST BG PEER-REVIEW PROBLEMS | 0 | 0 |
| 1366 | 0 | 1 | 438 1982 SCIENCE 218 (4575): 840-840 AASLESTAD HG PEER-REVIEW AT NIH | 0 | 1 |
| 1367 | 0 | 35 | 439 1982 SCIENTOMETRICS 4 (6): 417-430 SNIZEK WE; DUDLEY CJ; HUGHES JE THE 2ND PROCESS OF PEER-REVIEW - SOME CORRELATES OF COMMENTS PUBLISHED IN THE ASR (1947-1979) | 0 | 4 |
| 1368 | 0 | 0 | 440 1982 WEST VIRGINIA MEDICAL JOURNAL 78 (5): 126-126 [Anon] PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1369 | 0 | 8 | 442 1983 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 73 (10): 1182-1185 ADLER NE; MILSTEIN A EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF PHYSICIAN PEER-REVIEW - FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SUCCESSFUL PSROS | 0 | 0 |
| 1370 | 0 | 0 | 444 1983 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 12 (1): 57-57 KROME RL PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1371 | 0 | 0 | 445 1983 ARCHIVES OF SURGERY 118 (1): 17-17 BAUE AE A NEW YEAR AND A NEW LOOK, BUT THE SAME PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 0 | 0 |
| 1372 | 0 | 1 | 447 1983 BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY 70 (11): 698-698 JAMIESON C PEER-REVIEW - SHOULD IT BE BLIND - REPLY | 0 | 0 |
| 1373 | 0 | 1 | 448 1983 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 286 (6358): 56-56 HOWELLS JG PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 0 | 0 |
| 1374 | 0 | 1 | 449 1983 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 286 (6358): 56-57 MAHLER R PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 0 | 0 |
| 1375 | 0 | 1 | 450 1983 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 287 (6401): 1306-1306 ROE FJC PEER-REVIEW - HA HA | 0 | 0 |
| 1376 | 0 | 1 | 451 1983 BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY 36 (MAR): 91-91 BELOFF H PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES | 0 | 0 |
| 1377 | 0 | 0 | 453 1983 CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN 29 (MAY): 857-857 MCCAFFERY M PEER-REVIEW - OR SNEER REVIEW | 1 | 1 |
| 1378 | 0 | 0 | 454 1983 CLINICAL RESEARCH 31 (5): A872-A872 DESILVA M; MIZE G; RISSING JP ANTIBIOTIC AUDIT BY PEER-REVIEW - POSITIVE IMPACT ON PHYSICIAN PRESCRIBING | 0 | 0 |
| 1379 | 0 | 1 | 455 1983 ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A 15 (4): 432-434 GOULD P THINGS THAT WORRY ME .1. PEER-REVIEW AND CORRECTING ERROR | 0 | 0 |
| 1380 | 0 | 0 | 456 1983 HOSPITALS 57 (18): 31-31 BLOOM MZ PRO RULES CHANGE FOCUS OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1381 | 0 | 0 | 457 1983 HOSPITALS 57 (22): 28-28 MICKEL C AHA, HCFA NEGOTIATE PEER-REVIEW PROGRAM | 0 | 0 |
| 1382 | 0 | 0 | 458 1983 INTERFACES 13 (6): 110-112 ROSENMAN BB MANAGING AN MS OR ACTIVITY BY PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1383 | 0 | 21 | 459 1983 IOWA LAW REVIEW 68 (3): 585-600 WENTZ JA BALANCING ACADEMIC-FREEDOM AND CIVIL-RIGHTS - TOWARD AN APPROPRIATE PRIVILEGE FOR THE VOTES OF ACADEMIC PEER-REVIEW COMMITTEES | 0 | 0 |
| 1384 | 0 | 0 | 460 1983 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 250 (17): 2305-2306 ROSEN HM; SUSSMAN EJ MAKING PEER-REVIEW MORE PRODUCTIVE | 1 | 1 |
| 1385 | 0 | 1 | 461 1983 JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY 155 (5): 52-& SEPP P THE PEER-REVIEW EXPERIENCE | 0 | 0 |
| 1386 | 0 | 6 | 462 1983 JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY 156 (4): 78-& BREMSER WG PEER-REVIEW - ENHANCING QUALITY-CONTROL | 0 | 0 |
| 1387 | 0 | 0 | 463 1983 JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH 62: 234-234 WALDMAN HB; SHAKUN ML ATTITUDE TOWARDS PEER-REVIEW BY HEALTH PROFESSION STUDENTS | 0 | 0 |
| 1388 | 0 | 7 | 464 1983 JOURNAL OF FORECASTING 2 (3): 259-& ARMSTRONG JS; LUSK EJ THE ACCURACY OF ALTERNATIVE EXTRAPOLATION MODELS - ANALYSIS OF A FORECASTING COMPETITION THROUGH OPEN PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 34 |
| 1389 | 0 | 0 | 465 1983 JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW 8 (2): 293-313 HASTINGS DA LEGAL ISSUES RAISED BY PRIVATE REVIEW ACTIVITIES OF MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS | 1 | 2 |
| 1390 | 0 | 10 | 466 1983 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION 58 (6): 457-461 IRBY DM PEER-REVIEW OF TEACHING IN MEDICINE | 5 | 15 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Node / Date / Journal / Author | LCS | GCS |
| 1391 | 0 | 0 | 467 1983 JOURNAL OF NEUROBIOLOGY 14 (2): 95-112 OSMOND DH MALICES WONDERLAND - RESEARCH FUNDING AND PEER-REVIEW | 11 | 24 |
| 1392 | 0 | 4 | 468 1983 JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION 13 (7-8): 26-& GARRITSON SH PRACTICE PRIVILEGES DETERMINED BY PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1393 | 0 | 0 | 469 1983 JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION 22 (4): 143-143 DETORNYAY R WHY PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1394 | 0 | 5 | 470 1983 JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION 22 (7): 287-289 BRANNIGAN CN; BURSON JZ REVAMPING THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 0 | 3 |
| 1395 | 0 | 0 | 474 1983 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION 106 (4): 520-522 [Anon] SURVEY OF CONSTITUENT DENTAL SOCIETIES PEER-REVIEW SYSTEMS - ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION | 0 | 0 |
| 1396 | 0 | 0 | 475 1983 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 182 (9): 886-886 LUNDBERG GD PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1397 | 0 | 1 | 476 1983 NEW SCIENTIST 100 (1387): 752-753 CHERFAS J PEER COMMENTARY ON PEER-REVIEW - HARNAD,S | 1 | 1 |
| 1398 | 0 | 7 | 477 1983 NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL 96 (728): 214-215 MCKEAN WI PEER-REVIEW - CENTRAL-SPECIALIST-COMMITTEE STATEMENT | 1 | 2 |
| 1399 | 0 | 6 | 478 1983 NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL 96 (728): 216-217 WEST SR PEER-REVIEW - CENTRAL-EDUCATION-COMMITTEE STATEMENT | 1 | 2 |
| 1400 | 0 | 32 | 479 1983 NUCLEAR SAFETY 24 (6): 792-800 APOSTOLAKIS G; GARRICK BJ; OKRENT D ON QUALITY, PEER-REVIEW, AND THE ACHIEVEMENT OF CONSENSUS IN PROBABILISTIC RISK ANALYSIS | 0 | 4 |