Ranked All-Publication list HistoriographsGlossary  HistCite Guide  About
Mon Sep 25 15:45:48 2006

Papers found on Topic Search: "Peer Review"
Nodes: 3720, Authors: 6708, Journals: 1228, Cited References: 45083, Words: 5405, Tags: 1
Yearly outputDocument TypeLanguageInstitutionInstitution with SubdivisionCountry
Collection span: 1969 - 2006
View: Overview   Sorted by first author.

Page 20 of 38:  1  [  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20 ]  21   31 

#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
1901022333 2000 ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE 5 (9): 377-380
Linnebank F
The practical advantages of hospital quality systems such as NIAZ/PACE
01
1902071027 1991 INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT 27 (1): 129-133
LIPETZ BA
IMPLICATIONS OF NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR THE REVIEWING PROCESS
00
190300116 1976 BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS & INSTRUMENTATION 8 (2): 61-64
LIPKIN BS
ROLE OF STUDY SECTION IN NIH PEER REVIEW SYSTEM
00
19041262575 2001 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION 44 (3): 246-251
Liu EZF; Lin SSJ; Chiu CH; Yuan SM
Web-based peer review: The learner as both adapter and reviewer
23
1905012478 2000 PHYSICA B 284: 2055-2056
Liu FC; Adriaans MJ; Israelsson UE
Scientific research on LTMPF on the International Space Station
01
19068272741 2002 BIOSCIENCE 52 (9): 824-829
Liu JG; Pysarchik DT; Taylor WW
Peer review in the classroom
01
190702872 1989 SCIENTIST 3 (7): 1-&
LIVERSIDGE A
PNAS PUBLICATION OF AIDS ARTICLE SPURS DEBATE OVER PEER-REVIEW - IS THE NATIONAL ACADEMY TO BE PRAISED OR CHASTENED FOR DISSEMINATING THE VIEWS OF CONTROVERSIAL SCIENTIST DUESBERG,PETER
00
19084152530 2001 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 182 (2): 103-109
Livingston EH; Harwell JD
Peer review
01
1909091102 1992 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY 49 (7): 1681-1688
LOBAS NH; LEPINSKI PW; ABRAMOWITZ PW
EFFECTS OF PHARMACEUTICAL CARE ON MEDICATION COST AND QUALITY OF PATIENT-CARE IN AN AMBULATORY-CARE CLINIC
154
19104243662 2006 NEUROCIRUGIA 17 (2): 89-97
Lobato RD; Gonzalez P; Gomez PA; Alday R; Lagares A; et al.
The change in the editorial process of Neurocirugia, the journal of the Spanish Neurosurgical Society
00
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
1911622389 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285 (6350): 1224-1226
LOCK S
PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE
517
1912212645 1986 SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 17 (4): 304-316
LOCK S; SMITH J
PEER-REVIEW AT WORK
00
19133101181 1992 MEDICINA CLINICA 98 (8): 304-305
LOCK S
PEER-REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PAPERS
04
1914131258 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 307 (6900): 382-382
LOCK S
THE GROSSEST FAILURES OF PEER-REVIEW
33
19154241356 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121 (1): 60-61
LOCK S
DOES EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW WORK
812
191600854 1989 NATURE 340 (6235): 588-588
LOEHLE C
PEER-REVIEW (CONTINUED)
01
19170313687 2006 RISK ANALYSIS 26 (1): 25-31
Lofstedt R; Fairman R
Scientific peer review to inform regulatory decision making: A European perspective
00
19185692573 2001 HEALTH POLICY 58 (3): 191-213
Lombarts MJMH; Klazinga NS
A policy analysis of the introduction and dissemination of external peer review (visitatie) as a means of professional self-regulation amongst medical specialists in The Netherlands in the period 1985-2000
15
19193313016 2003 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 15 (2): 119-129
Lombarts MJMH; Klazinga NS
Supporting Dutch medical specialists with the implementation of visitatie recommendations: a descriptive evaluation of a 2-year project
22
19203203434 2005 JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE 11 (6): 587-597
Lombarts MJMH; Klazinga NS; Redekop K
Measuring the perceived impact of facilitation on implementing recommendations from external assessment: lessons from the Dutch visitatie programme for medical specialists
00
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
1921051800 1996 TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY 24 (5): 645-646
Long G
Perspectives on pathology peer review
01
1922002298 1999 PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH 16 (6): 783-784
Long RM
Learning the system: Changes pending in peer review and around the NIH
00
192301255 1979 JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE 5 (2): 135-136
LONSDALE HK
CASE FOR PEER-REVIEW
00
19249273492 2005 PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 116 (5): 1461-1472
Loonen MPJ; Hage JJ; Kon M
Who benefits from peer review? An analysis of the outcome of 100 requests for review by Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
11
1925253674 2006 PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 118 (2): 580-581
Loonen MPJ; Hage JJ; Kon M
"Who benefits from peer review? An analysis of the outcome of 100 requests for review by Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery" - Reply
00
192601875 1989 SCIENTIST 3 (22): 16-16
LOOP MS
PEER-REVIEW
00
192700303 1980 MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA 1 (2): 84-85
LORD DJ
PEER-REVIEW
00
1928002208 1999 CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN 45: 1107-+
Lordon A; Murray S
Atlantic Provinces Medical Peer Review
00
1929261536 1995 EAST AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 72 (5): 335-337
LORE W
PEER-REVIEW AND REFEREEING IN SCIENCE
11
193001751 1988 JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING 13 (1): 162-163
LORENTZON M
NURSING QUALITY MEASUREMENT - QUALITY ASSURANCE METHODS FOR PEER-REVIEW - PEARSON,A
00
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
193103251 1979 JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY 148 (4): 78-82
LOSCALZO MA
WHAT IS PEER-REVIEW ALL ABOUT
00
193200967 1990 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 78 (6): 380-380
LOUBSER JS
PEER-REVIEW - AN OPEN-LETTER TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL-PROFESSION
00
19330212376 2000 COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES 26 (3A): A123-A132
Loudon TV
Geoscience after IT Part M. Business requirements drive the information system, and provide coherent frameworks. Epilog
00
193413373 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5 (2): 219-220
LOUTTIT RT
PEER-REVIEW - PREDICTION OF THE FUTURE OR JUDGMENT OF THE PAST
11
193501306 1980 MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA 1 (9): 446-446
LOVE A
AUDIT OF PEER-REVIEW
00
193600962 1990 SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE 31 (8): 909-910
LOVEJOY CO
SCIENTIFIC RACISM - REFLECTIONS ON PEER-REVIEW, SCIENCE AND IDEOLOGY - COMMENTS
01
19370131874 1997 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING 18 (15): 3291-3295
Loveland TR; Belward AS
The IGBP-DIS global 1 km land cover data set, DISCover: first results
024
19384313518 2005 SCIENTOMETRICS 64 (2): 133-150
Lozano S; Salmeron JL
Data envelopment analysis of OR/MS journals
00
1939141592 1995 JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE 39 (6): 1054-1057
Lozen YM; Cassin BJ; Ledgerwood AM; Lucas; CE
The value of the medical examiner as a member of the multidisciplinary trauma morbidity mortality committee
00
19400283215 2004 JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE 19 (5): 402-409
Lucas BP; Evans AT; Reilly BM; Khodakov YV; Perumal K; et al.
The impact of evidence on physicians' inpatient treatment decisions
03
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
19414101247 1993 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 16 (2): 399-400
LUCE RD
RELIABILITY IS NEITHER TO BE EXPECTED NOR DESIRED IN PEER-REVIEW
00
19425162822 2002 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 9 (2): 105-108
Ludbrook J
Peer review of manuscripts
35
194313193029 2003 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 10 (5): 540-542
Ludbrook J
Peer review of biomedical manuscripts: an update
00
1944001348 1993 WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH 65 (6): 707-707
LUEHING C
PEER-REVIEW
00
194524113 1976 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 133 (8): 891-895
LUFT LL; SAMPSON LM; NEWMAN DE
EFFECTS OF PEER REVIEW ON OUTPATIENT PSYCHOTHERAPY - THERAPIST AND PATIENT FOLLOW-UP SURVEY
613
194626166 1977 HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY 28 (12): 889-894
LUFT LL; NEWMAN DE
THERAPISTS ACCEPTANCE OF PEER REVIEW IN A COMMUNITY-MENTAL-HEALTH-CENTER
26
1947093346 2005 BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION 29 (3): 470-487
Luiselli JK; Russo DC
Clinical peer review - Description of a comprehensive model in behavioral healthcare
00
1948022401 1982 HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 17 (2): 113-123
LUKE RD; MODROW RE
PROFESSIONALISM, ACCOUNTABILITY AND PEER-REVIEW
36
19492282559 2001 CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 42 (5): 500-503
Lukic IK; Marusic M
Appointment of statistical editor and quality of statistics in a small medical journal
06
1950022440 2000 JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 31 (2): 87-95
Lumsden DB
Jump-starting a journal's paper flow: Fourteen tested, effective methods
00
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
195100475 1983 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 182 (9): 886-886
LUNDBERG GD
PEER-REVIEW
00
1952001726 1996 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 275 (10): 804-804
Lundberg GD
The JAMA 1995 editorial peer review audit
00
1953001972 1998 ACTA PHARMACOLOGICA SINICA 19: 37-37
Lundberg GD
The ethics and practice of authorship and peer review
00
195400868 1989 RESEARCH JOURNAL OF THE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION 61 (11-12): 1619-1619
LUTHY RG
THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS AND THE QUALITY OF THE RESEARCH JOURNAL
00
1955042893 2002 RESEARCH EVALUATION 11 (2): 81-84
Luukkonen T
Research evaluation in Europe: state of the art
01
19560212035 1998 INTERLENDING & DOCUMENT SUPPLY 26 (3): 130-+
Luzi D
E-print archives: a new communication pattern for grey literature
02
19570122536 2001 ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 161 (12): 1549-1554
Lyder CH; Preston J; Grady JN; Scinto J; Allman R; et al.
Quality of care for hospitalized Medicare patients at risk for pressure ulcers
021
1958002764 2002 CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS 24 (10): 1646-1647
Lyles A
Peer review and evidence-based decisions
00
1959002639 2001 METEORITICS & PLANETARY SCIENCE 36 (12): 1569-1569
Lyon I
The importance of peer review
01
196012493 1983 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 64 (21): 807-807
MAARTENS R
PEER-REVIEW - ARE WE HANGING THE RIGHT MAN
00
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
1961001272 1993 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT 26 (2-3): 203-218
MACDONALD LH; SMART A
BEYOND THE GUIDELINES - PRACTICAL LESSONS FOR MONITORING
08
19624403278 2004 QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE 13 (5): 356-362
Macfarlane F; Greenhalgh T; Schofield T; Desombre T
RCGP quality team development programme: an illuminative evaluation
12
1963072015 1998 EAST AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 75 (6): S37-S38
Macharia WM
Study design, research data and conclusions
00
1964001318 1993 NATURE 364 (6437): 470-470
MACILWAIN C
UNITED-STATES AGENCIES URGED TO TIGHTEN UP PEER-REVIEW
00
1965001603 1995 NATURE 378 (6557): 526-526
MACILWAIN C
REPORT ON US NUCLEAR REPOSITORY NEEDS EFFECTIVE PEER-REVIEW
00
1966001758 1996 NATURE 384 (6604): 4-4
Macilwain C
Settlement deprives peer review of its day in court
00
1967002116 1998 NATURE 391 (6667): 525-525
Macilwain C
Argentina gives peer review a boost
01
1968001849 1997 COMPENDIUM ON CONTINUING EDUCATION FOR THE PRACTICING VETERINARIAN 19 (3): 261-261
Macintire DK
Compendium's refereed peer review: What does it mean to you?
00
1969001731 1996 JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH 75 (5): 1200-1200
Mackin N; Stephens CD
Evaluation of an orthodontic expert system by peer review trial.
00
197000834 1989 JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY 167 (6): 87-90
MACKLIN M
HOW 3 FIRMS BENEFITED FROM PEER-REVIEW
00
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
197100109 1975 SCIENCE 190 (4215): 617-617
MACLANE S
PEER REVIEW AND STRUCTURE OF SCIENCE
44
197201264 1979 NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL 90 (642): 167-168
MACLAURIN C
PEER-REVIEW AND QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HEALTH-CARE IN AUSTRALIA - CONFERENCE REPORT
00
19730222153 1998 TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT 10 (2): 139-155
MacLean M; Anderson J; Martin BR
Identifying research priorities in public sector funding agencies: Mapping science outputs on to user needs
03
19741202651 2001 OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY 56 (3): 121-123
MacLennan AH
A guest editorial from abroad: Medicolegal opinion - Time for peer review
02
19750112356 2000 ASLIB PROCEEDINGS 52 (8): 273-276
Madden AD
When did peer review become anonymous? Comment
00
197600521 1984 NATURE 312 (5994): 497-497
MADDOX J
PRIVACY AND THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM
38
197701847 1989 NATURE 339 (6219): 11-11
MADDOX J
WHERE NEXT WITH PEER-REVIEW
01
197802878 1989 TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES 14 (6): 213-213
MADDOX J
PEER-REVIEW AND PUBLISHING
00
19790251608 1995 NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY 112 (2): 169-180
MADNI IK
INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF MELCOR AS A SEVERE ACCIDENT THERMAL-HYDRAULIC SOURCE-TERM ANALYSIS TOOL
00
19800102718 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE 23 (1): 43-46
Maglione MA; Stone EG; Shekelle PG
Mass mailings have little effect on utilization of influenza vaccine among medicare beneficiaries
04
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
1981001375 1994 CLINICAL RESEARCH 42 (3): A369-A369
MAGNAN S; WARREN JB
INTERNAL-MEDICINE RESIDENT AND FACULTY ATTITUDES TOWARD PEER-REVIEW
00
1982003126 2004 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS 4 (1): VII-VIII
Magnus D
Politics and peer review
00
198305209 1978 COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL 14 (3): 190-198
MAGUIRE L
PEER REVIEW IN COMMUNITY MENTAL-HEALTH
01
1984001364 1994 AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY 34 (4): 389-392
MAHER CF; CAVE DG; HARAN MV
CESAREAN-SECTION RATE REDUCED
02
198501449 1983 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 286 (6358): 56-57
MAHLER R
PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE
00
1986001065 1991 PHYSICS WORLD 4 (11): 14-14
MAHNIG M
THE TYRANNY OF PEER-REVIEW
00
198714997 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 157-157
MAHONEY MJ
JUSTICE, EFFICIENCY, AND EPISTEMOLOGY IN THE PEER-REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPTS
12
1988081024 1991 GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY 37 (6): 597-599
MAI HD; SANOWSKI RA; WARING JP
IMPROVED PATIENT-CARE USING THE A/S/G/E GUIDELINES ON QUALITY ASSURANCE - A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE-STUDY
014
19892113565 2006 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 200 (10): 581-584
Maidment Y
A comparison of the perceived effects on Scottish general dental practitioners of peer review and other continuing professional development
00
1990563494 2005 PLOS BIOLOGY 3 (9): Art. No. e326
Mainguy G; Motamedi MR; Mietchen D
Peer review - The newcomers' perspective
11
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
199101732207 1999 BULLETIN DU CANCER 86 (7-8): 640-665
Maire F; Borowski B; Collangettes D; Farsi F; Guichard M; et al.
Standards, Options and Recommendations (SOR) for good practices in dentistry for head and neck cancer patients
02
19920102868 2002 MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES 11 (2): 61-65
Maisonneuve H; Dutson E; Marescaux J
The virtual university
02
1993243592 2006 HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES 51 (2): 350-351
Makropoulos C; Butler D; Maksimovic C
Discussion of "Editorial - The peer-review system: prospects and challenges"
11
1994071937 1997 REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION CLINICA 49 (4): 303-308
Malacara JM
The evaluation of medical research
00
1995002678 2001 SCIENCE 294 (5545): 1255-+
Malakoff D
Science policy - Peer-review critic gets NIH 'rejects'
11
19960162293 1999 NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL 112 (1087): 162-164
Malcolm L; Wright L; Seers M; Guthrie J
An evaluation of pharmaceutical management and budget holding in Pegasus Medical Group
010
1997253688 2006 RISK ANALYSIS 26 (1): 33-35
Male T
Legislating peer review in the Endangered Species Act
00
1998001652 1996 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 212: 9-CHED
Malik DJ
External peer review of course content: A new dimension in evaluating teaching excellence.
00
199900798 1989 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY 46 (12): 2454-2454
MALIT K
PEER-REVIEW APPROACH TO MEDICATION INCIDENTS
00
2000062360 2000 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY 70 (12): 834-836
Malycha P; Tyson S
National breast surgery audit
17

Page 20 of 38:  1  [  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20 ]  21   31