Ranked All-Publication list HistoriographsGlossary  HistCite Guide  About
Mon Sep 25 15:45:48 2006

Papers found on Topic Search: "Peer Review"
Nodes: 3720, Authors: 6708, Journals: 1228, Cited References: 45083, Words: 5405, Tags: 1
Yearly outputDocument TypeLanguageInstitutionInstitution with SubdivisionCountry
Collection span: 1969 - 2006
View: Overview   Sorted by first author.

Page 11 of 38:  1  [  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20 ]  21   31 

#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
1001031771 1996 PREVENTIVE MEDICINE 25 (2): 102-104
Frank E
Editors' requests of peer reviewers: A study and a proposal
67
1002021224 1993 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 161 (5): 1101-1103
FRANK MS; MANN FA; GILLESPY T
QUALITY ASSURANCE - A SYSTEM THAT INTEGRATES A DIGITAL DICTATION SYSTEM WITH A COMPUTER-DATA BASE
12
1003061504 1995 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 164 (2): 489-491
FRANK MS; STERN EJ
THE DIGITAL MANUSCRIPT FOR PEER-REVIEW AND PUBLICATION - HOW CLOSE ARE WE
210
1004001809 1997 ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY 4 (10): 663-664
Franken EA
Peer review and academic radiology
00
10050403544 2006 AIDS CARE-PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIO-MEDICAL ASPECTS OF AIDS/HIV 18 (1): 54-59
Frankis JS; Flowers P
Cruising for sex: Sexual risk behaviours and HIV testing of men who cruise, inside and outwith public sex environments (PSE)
00
1006002070 1998 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION ETHICS 7 (2): 4-4
Franklin R
Problems with peer review - Comment
00
1007001017 1991 CRYO-LETTERS 12 (5): 253-254
FRANKS F
THEORY, PRACTICE AND MALPRACTICE - PEER-REVIEW
00
1008001018 1991 CRYO-LETTERS 12 (6): 315-317
FRANKS F
PEER-REVIEW AS A TOOL IN FUNDING POLITICS - REQUIEM FOR CRYOBIOLOGY
01
1009151958 1997 TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY 25 (3): 335-337
Frantz JD
Pathology peer review
01
10100101366 1994 BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE 44 (384): 293-296
FRASER RC; MCKINLEY RK; MULHOLLAND H
CONSULTATION COMPETENCE IN GENERAL-PRACTICE - TESTING THE RELIABILITY OF THE LEICESTER ASSESSMENT PACKAGE
023
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
10111261832 1997 BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE 47 (424): 743-746
Fraser RC; Khunti K; Baker R; Lakhani M
Effective audit in general practice: a method for systematically developing audit protocols containing evidence-based review criteria
07
101200758 1988 JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT 41 (5): 366-367
FRASIER GW
PEER-REVIEW OF TECHNICAL MANUSCRIPTS
00
1013053420 2005 JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE 11 (5): 780-782
Frass M; Schuster E; Muchitsch I; Duncan J; Gei W; et al.
Bias in the trial and reporting of trials of homeopathy: A fundamental breakdown in peer review and standards?
02
10145173441 2005 JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP 37 (1): 87-94
Freda MC; Kearney M
An international survey of nurse editors' roles and practices
11
101500629 1986 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY 34 (1): 74-74
FREED J; FINKEL S; REINER MA
PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS AND THE AGED
00
1016003128 2004 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING 104 (5): 72AA-72BB
Freeman JJ
From haiku to peer review
00
10170232859 2002 LIVER TRANSPLANTATION 8 (9): 851-858
Freeman RB; Wiesner RH; Harper A; McDiarmid SV; Lake J; et al.
The new liver allocation system: Moving toward evidence-based transplantation policy
072
1018021260 1993 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 149 (7): 928-928
FREI JV
PEER-REVIEW ANONYMITY
01
1019081048 1991 JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE 83 (12): 829-837
FREIREICH EJ
A STUDY OF THE STATUS OF CLINICAL CANCER-RESEARCH IN THE UNITED-STATES (1990)
012
10200933526 2005 SOCIOLOGICAL FORUM 20 (1): 3-33
Freudenburg WR
Seeding science, courting conclusions: Reexamining the intersection of science, corporate cash, and the law
01
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
102100487 1983 SCIENCE 222 (4628): 1079-1079
FRIEDL E
BYPASSING PEER-REVIEW FOR SCIENTIFIC FACILITIES
01
1022111505 1995 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 164 (4): 1007-1009
FRIEDMAN DP
MANUSCRIPT PEER-REVIEW AT THE AJR - FACTS, FIGURES, AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT
66
10234251624 1995 RADIOLOGY 196 (1): 219-226
FRIEDMAN DP; ROSETTI GF; FLANDERS AE; PICCOLI CW; RAO VM; et al.
MR-IMAGING - QUALITY ASSESSMENT METHOD AND RATINGS AT 33 CENTERS
09
1024003699 2006 SCIENTIST 20 (3): 14-14
Friedman KJ
The trouble with peer review
00
10253133410 2005 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 11 (2): 205-206
Friedman L; Richter ED
Conflicts of interest and scientific integrity
13
10262313603 2006 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 12 (1): 59-64
Friedman LS; Richter ED
Excessive and disproportionate advertising in peer-reviewed journals
00
10270151609 1995 NURSE EDUCATION TODAY 15 (4): 239-244
FRIEDMAN S; MARR J
A SUPERVISORY MODEL OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE - A JOINT SERVICE/EDUCATION INITIATIVE
06
1028002793 2002 FISHERIES 27 (5): 7-7
Froelich A
Klamath Basin report sparks debate about peer-review and "sound science"
00
1029003678 2006 RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH 29 (4): 253-255
Froman RD
The importance of peer review
00
1030002570 2001 GESUNDHEITSWESEN 63 (8-9): A14-A14
Fuhrmann J; Hubner M
Peer review methods in diagnosis-related groups
00
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
103100993 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14 (1): 147-147
FULLER S
PEER-REVIEW IS NOT ENOUGH - EDITORS MUST WORK WITH LIBRARIANS TO ENSURE ACCESS TO RESEARCH
00
1032121372 1994 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 309 (6953): 539-539
FURNESS P
PROMOTING RESEARCH INTO PEER-REVIEW - REFEREES SHOULD PROVIDE REFERENCES
00
1033022754 1988 JOURNAL OF LEGAL EDUCATION 38 (4): 535-544
FURROW BR
PEER-REVIEW - TEACHING THE RELATION BETWEEN COST AND QUALITY
00
10340322132 1998 RADIOLOGE 38 (1): 8-14
Furst H; Schildberg FW
Surgical treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases
07
1035031615 1995 PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS 81 (3): 858-858
Fusaro JA; Royce CA
A reanalysis of research data
00
1036042269 1999 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY 40 (5): 786-786
Fusaro RM
The physician scientist, peer review, and creativity
01
1037152276 1999 LANCET 354 (9190): 1649-1649
Fusaro RM
Overhaul of peer review at NIH
00
1038222289 1999 NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY 17 (12): 1146-1146
Fusaro RM
Creativity and peer review
01
10391132413 2000 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER 87 (5): 755-755
Fusaro RM
Hereditary cancer, creativity and peer review
00
10403413120 2004 ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 11 (2): 181-186
Gabbe BJ; Cameron PA; Wolfe R
TRISS: Does it get better than this?
07
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
1041171153 1992 INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS 30 (2): 93-101
GABEL RA
QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER-REVIEW FOR RECREDENTIALING RELICENSURE IN NEW-YORK-STATE
24
1042011471 1994 SCIENCE 265 (5169): 170-170
GABRIEL CJ
LIFE-SCIENCES PEER-REVIEW AT NASA
00
10430161764 1996 NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS 17 (7): 596-602
Gacinovic S; Buscombe J; Costa DC; Hilson A; Bomanji J; et al.
Inter-observer agreement in the reporting of Tc-99(m)-DMSA renal studies
015
10440382585 2001 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 285 (22): 2864-2870
Gage BF; Waterman AD; Shannon W; Boechler M; Rich MW; et al.
Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke - Results from the national registry of Atrial Fibrillation
2106
1045032344 2000 ANESTHESIOLOGY 92 (5): 1495-1495
Gage J
The purpose of peer review
00
1046061884 1997 JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING 10 (2): 47-50
Gale ME; Vincent ME; Robbins AH
Teleradiology for remote diagnosis: A prospective multi-year evaluation
016
1047001312 1993 NATURE 364 (6434): 183-184
GALE P
REFORM OPTIONS FOR PEER-REVIEW
00
1048003697 2006 SCIENTIST 20 (2): 13-13
Gallagher R
Taking on peer review
00
104908558 1985 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HOSPITAL PHARMACY 10 (4): 397-401
GALLO GR; VANDERZANDEN JA; WERTHEIMER AI
ANONYMOUS PEER-REVIEW OF ANSWERS RECEIVED FROM DRUG INFORMATION-CENTERS
01
1050001599 1995 NATURE 374 (6520): 295-295
GAMMIE F
GRANT CHALLENGES ROLE OF PEER-REVIEW IN AN AGE OF E-MAIL
12
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
10511262580 2001 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 13 (4): 325-332
Gandjour A; Westenhofer J; Wirth A; Fuchs C; Lauterbach KW
Development process of an evidence-based guideline for the treatment of obesity
05
105201515 1984 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION 108 (2): 156-156
GANGAROSA LP
PEER-REVIEW
00
1053002562 2001 EMBO REPORTS 2 (9): 743-743
Gannon F
The essential role of peer review
00
1054001294 1993 JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY 28 (2): 121-122
GANS SL
RECOGNITION IN PEER-REVIEW
01
105510543519 2005 SCIENTOMETRICS 64 (3): 271-300
Garcia CE; Sanz-Menendez L
Competition for funding as an indicator of research competitiveness
00
1056002829 2002 JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH 40 (6): 659-660
Garcia MH
Journal of hydraulic research peer review process
00
10572103598 2006 INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS 4053: 781-783
Garcia RMC; Pardo A; Kloos CD
Adaptive peer review based on student profiles
00
10584653705 2006 SCIENTOMETRICS 67 (2): 213-230
Garcia-Aracil A; Gracia AG; Perez-Marin M
Analysis of the evaluation process of the research performance: An empirical case
00
105931221227 1993 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 48 (9): 972-983
GARDNER W; WILCOX BL
POLITICAL INTERVENTION IN SCIENTIFIC PEER-REVIEW - RESEARCH ON ADOLESCENT SEXUAL-BEHAVIOR
020
1060249612 1986 CURRENT CONTENTS (31): 3-11
GARFIELD E
REFEREEING AND PEER-REVIEW .1. OPINION AND CONJECTURE ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF REFEREEING
00
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
10611178613 1986 CURRENT CONTENTS (32): 3-12
GARFIELD E
REFEREEING AND PEER-REVIEW .2. THE RESEARCH ON REFEREEING AND ALTERNATIVES TO THE PRESENT SYSTEM
00
1062726664 1987 CURRENT CONTENTS (4): 3-8
GARFIELD E
REFEREEING AND PEER-REVIEW .3. HOW THE PEER-REVIEW OF RESEARCH-GRANT PROPOSALS WORKS AND WHAT SCIENTISTS SAY ABOUT IT
00
10631035665 1987 CURRENT CONTENTS (5): 3-9
GARFIELD E
REFEREEING AND PEER-REVIEW .4. RESEARCH ON THE PEER-REVIEW OF GRANT PROPOSALS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT
00
106403710 1987 SCIENTIST 1 (7): 9-9
GARFIELD E
OPTING OUT OF THE NUMBERS GAME - ON THE NEED TO EMPHASIZE QUALITY IN PEER-REVIEW
00
106501786 1988 SCIENTIST 2 (24): 10-10
GARFIELD E
RELIGION, REBEL SCIENTISTS, AND PEER-REVIEW - 3 HOT TOPICS
00
1066010898 1990 CURRENT CONTENTS 39: 5-7
GARFIELD E
TRAINING OUR CITES ON THE STARS - ABT,HELMUT OBSERVATIONS ON ASTROSOCIOLOGY .1. AGE AND PRODUCTIVITY, PEER-REVIEW, AND BIG SCIENCE LITTLE SCIENCE - AN INTRODUCTION TO THE USE OF PUBLICATION STUDIES TO AFFECT POLICIES AND ATTITUDES IN ASTRONOMY .1. BY ABT,HELMUT,A.
00
1067111336 1993 SCIENTIST 7 (18): 12-12
GARFIELD E
DESPITE PROBLEMS WITH PEER-REVIEW, SCIENCE PUBLISHING IS HEALTHIER THAN EVER
00
106801912 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263 (10): 1376-1378
GARFUNKEL JM; LAWSON EE; HAMRICK HJ; ULSHEN MH
EFFECT OF ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION ON THE AUTHORS EVALUATION OF PEER-REVIEW OF MEDICAL MANUSCRIPTS
711
10690283382 2005 DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY 31 (8): 928-931
Garg G; Thami GP
Micropigmentation: Tattooing for medical purposes
00
107003254 1979 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION 54 (11): 852-855
GARG ML; GLIEBE WA; KLEINBERG WM
STUDENT PEER-REVIEW OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS AT THE MEDICAL-COLLEGE-OF-OHIO
16
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
10711101418 1994 JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 20 (12): 679-694
GARNICK DW; LAWTHERS AG; PALMER RH; MOENTMANN SJR; FOWLES J; et al.
A COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM FOR REVIEWING MEDICAL RECORDS FROM PHYSICIANS OFFICES
07
107204468 1983 JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION 13 (7-8): 26-&
GARRITSON SH
PRACTICE PRIVILEGES DETERMINED BY PEER-REVIEW
00
1073003370 2005 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN 83 (A9): 1061-1061
Garside J
IChemE's journals move to online submission and peer review
00
1074003387 2005 FOOD AND BIOPRODUCTS PROCESSING 83 (C3): 173-173
Garside J
LChemE's journals move to Online submission and peer review
00
10750301813 1997 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 176 (6): 1293-1298
Gates EA
New surgical procedures: Can our patients benefit while we learn?
129
107602863 1989 NEW SCIENTIST 123 (1674): 24-24
GAVAGHAN H
POACHED PAPER CHALLENGES PEER-REVIEW PROCESS
00
1077001452 1994 NATURE 369 (6478): 269-269
GAVAGHAN H
CAUTIOUS WELCOME TO NIH PEER-REVIEW REFORMS
11
1078011455 1994 NATURE 370 (6486): 170-171
GAVAGHAN H
PEER-REVIEW - NIH URGED TO STREAMLINE BIDS
00
1079011457 1994 NATURE 372 (6503): 209-209
GAVAGHAN H
CHANGES URGED IN NIH PEER-REVIEW PROCESS
00
1080001604 1995 NATURE MEDICINE 1 (6): 498-498
GAVAGHAN H
NEW OVERSIGHT FOR PEER-REVIEW
00
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
10810493402 2005 INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS 13 (3): 139-157
Ge X; Er N
An online support system to scaffold real-world problem solving
00
1082123599 2006 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS 27 (4): 357-357
Geddes A; O'Hara C
Rapid peer review and increased impact (vol 27, pg 357, 2006)
11
1083011185 1992 NATURE 355 (6360): 488-488
GEE H
UK SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY - PEERS SLAM PEER-REVIEW
02
10840611142 1992 DIABETES CARE 15 (1): 44-50
GEFFNER DL
DIABETES CARE IN HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS
08
10850471715 1996 HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 30 (6): 729-750
Geller SE; Burns LR; Brailer DJ
The impact of nonclinical factors on practice variations: The case of hysterectomies
017
1086351559 1995 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 273 (2): 114-115
GELLERT GA
EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW
00
10870341032 1991 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 265 (6): 752-755
GELLHORN A
PERIODIC PHYSICIAN RECREDENTIALING
319
10882162309 1999 SCHWEIZERISCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT 129 (38): 1354-1362
Genton CY; Bosman FT
Management of quality in histopathology: "from biopsy to diagnosis"
03
108901186 1977 MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA 2 (5): 170-170
GEORGE CRP
PEER REVIEW
00
10900782489 2000 RESEARCH POLICY 29 (4-5): 657-678
Georghiou L; Roessner D
Evaluating technology programs: tools and methods
117
#LCRNCRNode / Date / Journal / AuthorLCSGCS
10911802233 1999 HEALTH POLICY 46 (3): 217-238
Gerard K; Smoker I; Seymour J
Raising the quality of cost-utility analyses: lessons learnt and still to learn
121
10920142493 2000 SCHWEIZERISCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT 130 (49): 7S-10S
Gerber M; Fluckiger U; Wolfensberger M
Appropriateness of antibiotic use in ENT surgery
00
10931202038 1998 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 10 (1): 35-42
Gerlach FM; Beyer M; Romer A
Quality circles in ambulatory care: state of development and future perspective in Germany
410
1094003702 2006 SCIENTIST 20 (4): 14-14
Gessler M
More on peer review
00
1095003002 2003 FISHERIES 28 (11): 7-7
Geubner J
White House issues draft guidance on peer review science in the regulatory process
00
10960132414 2000 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER 87 (5): 756-757
Ghiorzo P; Bianchi-Scarra G
Hereditary cancer, creativity and peer review - Reply to Fusaro
00
10970132259 1999 JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY IN HIGHER EDUCATION 23 (2): 147-155
Gibbs G
Improving teaching, learning and assessment
06
109802784 1988 SCIENTIST 2 (18): 12-12
GIBSON WC
PERILS OF PEER-REVIEW
00
1099231080 1991 SERIALS LIBRARIAN 19 (3-4): 75-85
GIDEZ LI
THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES - A SURVEY OF ATTITUDES, PERCEPTIONS, AND EXPECTATIONS
01
1100082940 2003 AMERICAN BIOLOGY TEACHER 65 (4): 270-278
Gift N; Krasny M
The great fossil fiasco: Teaching about peer review
12

Page 11 of 38:  1  [  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20 ]  21   31