Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Fri Jul 9 10:34:25 2004
Topic Search: "Peer Review" plus the following:
LOCK S, 1986, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED,
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE,
BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231
COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC,

Nodes: 3179
Authors: 5486, Journals: 1041, Outer References: 34852
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by GCS.
Page 29:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
28015202592 2001 JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE 82(12):1719-1722
Arrive L; Dono P; Lewin M; Dahan H; Monnier-Cholley L; Tubiana JM
Publication rate of papers originally presented at the National French Congress of Radiology in 1996
00
2802002595 2001 JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME 83A(1):1-2
Heckman JD
Excellence through peer review
00
2803022596 2001 JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION 16(4):182-184
Barrett WL; Aron BS; Breneman JC; Narayana A; Redmond KP
Clinical oncology clerkship for third-year medical students
00
2804022597 2001 JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY 27(11):1707-1707
Koch DD
Peer review: A group activity
00
2805002600 2001 JOURNAL OF COATINGS TECHNOLOGY 73(916):7-7
Dickie RA
JCT, peer review and you
00
28060122605 2001 JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY 34():1-6
Wagner GS; Engblom H; Billgren T; Carlsson M; Hedstrom E; Ugander M; Selvester RHS; Arheden H; Eisenstein E; Kasper J; White R
A method for assembling a collaborative research team from multiple disciplines and academic centers to study the relationships between ECG estimation and MRI measurement of myocardial infarct size
00
28070112606 2001 JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY 34(1):41-47
Anderson ST; Pahlm O; Bacharova L; Barbagelata A; Chaitman BR; Clemmensen P; Goodman S; Heden B; Klootwijk PJ; Lauer M; MacFarlane PW; Rautaharju P; Reddy S; Selvester RH; Sgarbossa EB; Underwood D; Warner RA; Wagner GS
Standards for the function of an academic 12-lead electrocardiographic core laboratory
00
2808012610 2001 JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME 26A(5):811-812
[Anon]
Use and misuse of peer review publications
00
28091702612 2001 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 16(2):99-112
Bergquist M; Ljungberg J; Lundh-Snis U
Practising peer review in organizations: a qualifier for knowledge dissemination and legitimization
00
28105202613 2001 JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE 49(1):77-84
Bovier PA; Guillain H; Perneger TV
Productivity of medical research in Switzerland
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2811002614 2001 JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS 29(3-4):411-413
Aske JR
Evidence: No medical peer review privilege in discrimination actions
00
2812112617 2001 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING 8(3):168-168
McCann J; Britton PD; Warren RML; Hunnam G
Radiological peer review of interval cancers in the East Anglian breast screening programme: what are we missing (vol 8, pg 77, 2001)
00
28130112621 2001 JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH 20(3):1293-1298
Leonard DL
National Indicator Study: Is an international approach feasible?
00
28142572622 2001 JOURNAL OF SPORTS CHIROPRACTIC & REHABILITATION 15(1):5-19
Green BN; Johnson CD; Adams A
Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade
00
2815002623 2001 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY 37(2):197A-197A
Wiles JD; Samra JS; Gill R; Deedwania PC
Can the external peer review process provide adequate feedback to sustain the implementation of the heart failure guidelines by primary care providers?
00
2816012625 2001 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 52(11):984-985
Stirling DA
Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses.
00
2817002627 2001 LANCET 358(9286):991-991
McLellan F
Peer-review meeting participants urge greater accountability
00
2818142629 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(1):33-40
Tomlins CL
Just one more 'zine? Maintaining and improving the scholarly journal in the electronic present: a view from the humanities
00
28195292634 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(4):273-285
Shum SB; Sumner T
JIME: an interactive journal for interactive media (Reprinted from First Monday, vol 6, 2001)
00
2820282635 2001 LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH 23(1):1-3
Hernon PP; Schwartz CC
Peer review
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2821022636 2001 LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH 23(4):371-372
White MD
Editorial peer review, its strengths and weaknesses
00
2822002637 2001 LIBRARY JOURNAL 126(15):57-57
Cronin B
Peer review and the stuff of scholarship
00
2823002642 2001 MEDICAL EDUCATION 35(11):1089-1090
Gray L
Use of psychophysical scaling for peer-review in problem-based learning
00
2824002647 2001 NATURE IMMUNOLOGY 2(4):277-277
Rocha B
Trouble with peer review
00
2825002648 2001 NATURE IMMUNOLOGY 2(10):892-892
Klein JR
More about peer review: is it time for double-blind reviews?
00
2826002650 2001 NEW REPUBLIC 225(2-3):18-19
Chait J
Peer review - William F. Buckley steals a colleague's work.
00
2827002651 2001 NUCLEAR ENERGY-JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH NUCLEAR ENERGY SOCIETY 40(2):119-122
Earp JE
UK Nuclear power plants - aspiring to world-class performance
00
28280222654 2001 NURSE EDUCATION TODAY 21(6):444-454
Costello J; Pateman B; Pusey H; Longshaw K
Peer review of classroom teaching: an interim report
00
28290212655 2001 NURSING OUTLOOK 49(5):217-222
Nelson ML
A model for scholarship in nursing: The case of a private liberal arts college
00
2830012657 2001 ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW 25(6):409-409
Calvert P
Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
28310222658 2001 PALLIATIVE MEDICINE 15(1):49-54
Hargreaves PN; Peppiatt R
Is videotaping of consultations acceptable to patients attending a hospice day centre?
00
28321222661 2001 PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE 23(3):111-115
Radley A; Millar B; Hamley J
Development of patient-centred performance indicators to guide the delivery of pharmaceutical care in a district general hospital
00
2833022662 2001 PHYSICA MEDICA 17():90-91
Lewis CA
Recognition of the qualified expert in the United Kingdom
00
28340192663 2001 PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 108(2):460-465
Zbar RIS; Otake LR; Miller MJ; Persing JA; Dingman DL
Web-based medicine as a means to establish centers of surgical excellence in the developing world
00
2835032668 2001 PSYCOLOQUY 12(19):art. no.-11
Meyer J
Scientific journals by and for scientists - Book review of Tenopir and King on electronic journals
00
2836032669 2001 PSYCOLOQUY 12(21):1-3
Mills ME
Authors of the world unite: Liberating academic content from publishers' restrictions - Book review of Tenopir & King on Electronic Journals
00
2837042670 2001 PSYCOLOQUY 12(22):1-4
Oullier O; Michel-Kerjan E
Does scientific publication need a peer consensus? Commentary on Stodolsky on consensus-journals
00
2838002679 2001 SCIENCE 291(5506):959-959
Pokrovsky V
Russian science - Danger to peer review is in eye of beholder
00
2839002680 2001 SCIENCE 291(5513):2533-+
Mervis J
Peer review - NSF scores low on using own criteria
00
2840002681 2001 SCIENCE 293(5533):1234-1234
Marshall E
Biomedical policy - NIH wins an exemption from HHS peer-review overhaul
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
28416292684 2001 SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 7(2):193-204
Atkinson M
'Peer review' culture
00
2842022685 2001 SCIENTIST 15(15):6-6
Berezin AA
Peer review: Open, not anonymous
00
2843022686 2001 SCIENTIST 15(21):39-39
Weller AC
Peer review: Do studies prove its effectiveness?
10
2844112687 2001 SCIENTIST 15(23):6-6
Hallman G
Peer review
00
28452212689 2001 SCIENTOMETRICS 50(3):523-537
Hornbostel S
Third party funding of German universities. An indicator of research activity?
00
2846032691 2001 SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 46(6):165-166
Wilson SM; Burke G
Clinical standards board for Scotland: Peer review visit
00
2847032694 2001 SOCIETY 38(2):47-54
Henderson A
Undermining peer review
00
2848002697 2001 TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION 48(3):261-262
Hayhoe GF
Something so right: Why i'm proud of our review process
00
2849002702 2001 TRANSFUSION 41(9):135S-136S
Chapman JF; Cook R
Peer review of blood stocks management in hospitals and a blood service using an innovative web based data management system
00
28500102704 2001 WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 44(11-12):295-302
Goforth GF
Surmounting the engineering challenges of Everglades restoration
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
28510422705 2001 WRITTEN COMMUNICATION 18(2):107-179
Wiemelt J
Toward an activity-based conception of writing and school writing contexts
00
2852002706 2002 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 223():U187-U188
Coppola BP
Technologies for student-generated work in a peer-led, peer-review instructional environment.
00
2853002707 2002 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 223():U188-U188
Stewart IC; Coppola BP
Technologies for student-generated work in a peer-led, peer-review instructional environment.
00
2854002708 2002 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 223():U189-U189
Manning T
Teaching undergraduate research at the peer review label.
00
2855002709 2002 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 224():U296-U296
Orth DL; Ryter AW
Incorporation of calibrated peer review writing assignments in general chemistry laboratory and introductory chemistry courses.
00
2856002710 2002 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 224():U296-U296
Wimpfheimer T
Using calibrated peer review (CPR) in small classes at Salem State College.
00
2857002711 2002 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 224():U296-U297
Sady MB; Russell AA; Su TM
Calibrated peer review assignment: Identify a chemical.
00
28580152712 2002 ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 9(3):248-250
Marco CA; Larkin GL; Silbergleit R
Filming of patients in academic emergency departments
00
2859082714 2002 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 77(10):S7-S9
Richards BF; Moran BJ; Friedland JA; Kirkland RT; Searle NS; Coburn M
A criterion-based, peer review process for assessing the scholarship of educational leadership
00
28603142715 2002 ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY 26(4):221-222
Roberts LW
On the centrality of peer review
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
28610242716 2002 ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION 26(3):174-184
Pelaez NJ
Problem-based writing with peer review improves academic performance in physiology
00
28620492717 2002 AIDS 16():S76-S82
Paiva V; Ayres JR; Buchalla CM; Hearst N
Building partnerships to respond to HIV/AIDS: non-governmental organizations and universities
00
28630142718 2002 ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS 16():S18-S28
Van Eldik LJ; Koppal T; Watterson DM
Barriers to Alzheimer disease drug discovery and development in academia
00
2864002719 2002 AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL 144(5):931-931
Karp HR; Larson-Jones BJ
Improving the quality of the continuum of care provided by home health agencies for patients with cardiovascular disease: The design of a pilot project being conducted by a peer review organization
00
28650172720 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY 17(5):171-174
Gruber T; Rudnitsky B
Can we be certain of PRO accuracy and accountability? Inaccurate "report cards" generated by Medicare claims data as a marker for laboratory testing in diabetic patients
00
2866002722 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 134(5):744-745
Liesegang TJ
The American Journal of Ophthalmology announces online submission and peer review process
00
2867062726 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 184(1):16-18
Allen JW; DeSimone KJ
Valid peer review for surgeons working in small hospitals
00
2868002729 2002 AMERICAN SCIENTIST 90(2):106-106
Fox MA
In praise of peer review
00
28699232731 2002 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 40(3):313-316
Callaham ML
Research into peer review and scientific publication: Journals look in the mirror
00
28700162735 2002 ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY 49(5):460-465
Jejurikar SS; Rovak JM; Kuzon WM; Chung KC; Kotsis SV; Cederna PS
Evaluation of plastic surgery information on the Internet
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
28710472738 2002 ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION 83(6):776-783
Light CM; Chappell PH; Kyberd PJ
Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: Normative data, reliability, and validity
00
28720202739 2002 ARCHIVES OF SURGERY 137(4):413-416
Hyman N; Labow SB; Vermont Chapter Amer Coll Surgeons
The Vermont colorectal cancer project - Self-portrait
00
2873002741 2002 ASIST 2002: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 65TH ASIST ANNUAL MEETING, VOL 39, 2002 39():452-453
Hurd J; Brown CM; Bartlett J; Krietz P; Paris G
The role of "unpublished" research in the scholarly communication of scientists: Digital preprints and bioinformation databases - Sponsored by SIG STI, SIG BIO, SIG PUB
00
2874002742 2002 ASIST 2002: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 65TH ASIST ANNUAL MEETING, VOL 39, 2002 39():480-481
Vaughan KTL; Blixrud J; Hahn KL; Cohn D
The changing face of scientific communication: Developing new models for scholarly publishing in the electronic environment
00
28758272746 2002 BIOSCIENCE 52(9):824-829
Liu JG; Pysarchik DT; Taylor WW
Peer review in the classroom
00
2876112747 2002 BLOOD CELLS MOLECULES AND DISEASES 28(1):91-91
Lichtman MA; Oakes D
The productivity and impact of the leukemia & lymphoma society scholar program: The apparent positive effect of peer review (vol 27, pg 1020, 2001)
00
2877002750 2002 BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY 53(1):1-2
Lennard MS; Ratter JM; Begg EJ; Tucker GT
The Journal moves online for submission and peer review
00
2878002752 2002 BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY 89():79-79
Thompson AM; McPhillips G; Burton H; Stonebridge PA
Deaths while in surgical care: mapping improvements in practice over 7 years of continuous peer review audit
00
2879002757 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 325(7362):492-493
Bacchetti P
Peer review of statistics in medical research - Author's thoughts on power calculations
00
2880112758 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 325(7362):493-493
Barton GA
Peer review of statistics in medical research - Reviewers' contributions should be thoughtful, constructive, and encouraging
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2881112759 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 325(7362):493-493
Fox M
Peer review of statistics in medical research - Suggested solution may, partly solve other problem
00
28820152760 2002 BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION 80(1):47-55
Walker D; McDermott JM; Fox-Rushby J; Tanjung M; Nadjib M; Widiatmoko D; Achadi E
An economic analysis of midwifery training programmes in South Kalimantan, Indonesia
00
28834292761 2002 CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN 48():1337-1344
Goulet F; Jacques A; Gagnon R; Bourbeau D; Laberge D; Melanson J; Menard C; Racette P; Rivest R
Performance assessment - Family physicians in Montreal meet the mark!
00
288411172764 2002 CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH 56(3):339-346
Opthof T; Coronel R; Janse MJ
The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias
00
2885002765 2002 CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS 80(26):14-14
[Anon]
Federal peer review under scrutiny
00
28861122766 2002 CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH 8(4):957-962
Young-McCaughan S; Rich IM; Lindsay GC; Bertram KA
The Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program: Innovations in the federal funding of biomedical research
00
2887002769 2002 CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS 24(10):1646-1647
Lyles A
Peer review and evidence-based decisions
00
2888012770 2002 COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES 63(2):205-206
Shiflett L
Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses.
00
28890412771 2002 CONSERVATION ECOLOGY 5(2):-
Marmorek D; Peters C
Finding a PATH toward scientific collaboration: Insights from the Columbia River basin
00
2890032773 2002 CORTEX 38(3):406-407
Jelicic M; Merckelbach H
Peer-review: Let's imitate the lawyers!
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2891002774 2002 CORTEX 38(3):411-411
Carlstedt RA
Cortex forum on peer-review multiple submissions
00
2892002775 2002 CORTEX 38(3):412-412
Klein DF
Peer review and data access
00
2893002776 2002 CORTEX 38(3):417-418
Marques JF
Naive views of peer-review and what do they tell us
00
2894002777 2002 CORTEX 38(3):419-420
Bock O
The peer-review process: Accept, revise, or reject?
00
2895002781 2002 DERMATOLOGY 204():3-5
Kobayashi H
Keynote lecture: Perspective of infection control and prevention in hospitals - Importance of antisepsis
00
28961182782 2002 DIGESTIVE DISEASES 20(3-4):230-235
Farthing MJG
Publication ethics in gastroenterology and endoscopy
00
28970162783 2002 DISEASE MANAGEMENT & HEALTH OUTCOMES 10(12):743-748
Wertheimer AI; Chaney NM
Clinical guidelines in disease management
00
28980152785 2002 DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL 36(4):831-837
Miranda GF; Ginestet J
The attitude of pharmaceutical industry research scientists to browsing and publishing on Internet preprint and e-print servers
00
28990162786 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS 39(2-3):102-107
Platner JH; Bennett LM; Millikan R; Barker MDG
The partnership between breast cancer advocates and scientists
00
2900122787 2002 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY 102(1):4-5
Elferink-Stinkens PM; Merkus JMWM
The obstetric peer review system in The Netherlands
00

Page 29:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14