Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Fri Jul 9 10:34:27 2004
Topic Search: "Peer Review" plus the following:
LOCK S, 1986, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED,
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE,
BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231
COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC,

Nodes: 3179
Authors: 5486, Journals: 1041, Outer References: 34852
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by first author.
Page 1:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
101441 1982 SCIENCE 218(4575):840-840
AASLESTAD HG
PEER-REVIEW AT NIH
01
2001193 1992 NATURE 358(6381):9-9
ABBOTT A
ITALIAN PEER-REVIEW UNDER PRESSURE
01
3011605 1995 NATURE 374(6520):299-299
ABBOTT A
ITALY WIDENS PEER-REVIEW OF HEALTH RESEARCH
01
4001761 1996 NATURE 383(6601):567-567
Abbott A
Funding cuts put pressure on peer review
16
5001925 1997 NATURE 387(6633):538-538
Abbott A
Italian universities move to peer review for grants
00
6012124 1998 NATURE 392(6676):531-531
Abbott A
Peer review outs power of Italy's 'barons'
00
72151411 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):105-107
ABBY M; MASSEY MD; GALANDIUK S; POLK HC
PEER-REVIEW IS AN EFFECTIVE SCREENING PROCESS TO EVALUATE MEDICAL MANUSCRIPTS
617
809937 1990 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE 41(3):216-222
ABELSON P
MECHANISMS FOR EVALUATING SCIENTIFIC-INFORMATION AND THE ROLE OF PEER-REVIEW
12
91112881 2002 NERVENARZT 73(10):956-+
Abragam A; Lincke HO; Lux A; Wallech CW
Peer review of routine clinical case reports - an instrument of quality management? Results of a pilot investigation
00
102331089 1991 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 21(1):111-132
ABRAMS PA
THE PREDICTIVE ABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW OF GRANT PROPOSALS - THE CASE OF ECOLOGY AND THE UNITED-STATES-NATIONAL-SCIENCE-FOUNDATION
69
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1103925 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 264(24):3143-3143
ABSHER JR
PEER-REVIEW AND THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
01
1201557 1985 HUMAN PATHOLOGY 16(8):761-762
ACKERMAN AB
THE PATHOLOGIST IN THE COURTROOM - PEER-REVIEW IS NEEDED
06
1300252 1979 HOSPITALS 53(10):91-&
ACKERMAN FK
MANAGEMENT PEER-REVIEW AUDITS EFFICIENCY
00
14072375 2000 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY 16(10):1249-1254
Ackman ML; Druteika D; Tsuyuki RT
Levels of evidence in cardiovascular clinical practice guidelines
03
150342096 1998 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS 186(5):528-533
Acosta JA; Yang JC; Winchell RJ; Simons RK; Fortlage DA; Hollingsworth-Fridlund P; Hoyt DB
Lethal injuries and time to death in a level I trauma center
026
160481560 1995 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 30(6):643-662
Adair JG
The research environment in developing countries: Contributions to the national development of the discipline
07
1700367 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):196-196
ADAIR RK
A PHYSICS EDITOR COMMENTS ON PETERS AND CECIS PEER-REVIEW STUDY
210
18012201 1999 ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE 153(11):1121-1122
Adams JA
Medical evaluation of suspected child sexual abuse - It's time for standardized training, referral centers, and routine peer review
03
1900992 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):135-135
ADAMS KM
PEER-REVIEW - AN UNFLATTERING PICTURE
22
20002926 2002 STROKE 33(1):326-326
Adams R; Acker J; Alberts M; Andrews L; Atkinson R; Fenelon K; Furlan A; Girgus M; Horton K; Hughes R; Koroshetz W; Latchaw R; Magnis E; Mayberg M; Pancioli A; Robertson RM; Shephard T; Smith R; Smith SC; Smith S; Stranne SK; Kenton EJ; Acker J; Adams R; Bashe G; Chavez A; Goldstein LB; Hodosh R; Hughes R; Keitel C; Kelly-Hayes M; Latchaw R; Leonard A; Morgenstern L; Pancioli A; Wood JO; Advisory Working Grp; ASA Standing Advisory Comm
Recommendations for improving the quality of care through stroke centers and systems: An examination of stroke center identification options - Multidisciplinary consensus recommendations from the advisory working group on stroke center identification options of the American Stroke Association
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
21021700 1996 CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS 74(7):4-&
Adebodun F
Peer review reform
00
2208445 1983 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 73(10):1182-1185
ADLER NE; MILSTEIN A
EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF PHYSICIAN PEER-REVIEW - FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SUCCESSFUL PSROS
00
2300580 1985 PHYSICS TODAY 38(7):98-98
ADOMIAN G
PEER-REVIEW
00
24022471 2000 NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA 13(2):105-106
Aggarwal R
On peer review
00
2500940 1990 JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE 40(3):87-88
AGIUS RM
PEER-REVIEW AUDIT IN OCCUPATIONAL-MEDICINE
04
26001617 1995 OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD 45(3):125-130
AGIUS RM; SEATON A; LEE RJ
AUDIT OF SICKNESS ABSENCE AND FITNESS-FOR-WORK REFERRALS
09
27002149 1998 SCIENTIST 12(10):1-+
Agnew B
New NIH procedures to shield clinicians from grants bias
10
28002317 1999 SCIENCE 286(5442):1074-1076
Agnew B
Biomedical research - NIH eyes sweeping reform of peer review
02
29002318 1999 SCIENCE 286(5444):1453-1454
Agnew B
NIH - Protests win changes to peer-review proposal
00
300362015 1998 CLIMATIC CHANGE 39(4):621-642
Agrawala S
Structural and process history of the intergovernmental panel on climate change
012
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
3100717 1987 SCIENTIST 1(19):7-7
AGRES T
NAS FAULTS PEER-REVIEW AT USDA
00
3200781 1988 SCIENTIST 2(1):6-6
AGRES T
NSF PUSHED TO OPEN UP PEER-REVIEW
00
3301782 1988 SCIENTIST 2(3):5-5
AGRES T
USDA TO STRENGTHEN PEER-REVIEW
00
340132481 2000 ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW 24(2):138-143
Aguillo I
A new generation of tools for search, recovery and quality evaluation of World Wide Web medical resources
02
350171944 1997 REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE 125(7):765-774
Aguirre CL
History of Revista Medica de Chile from its foundations in 1872 until 1997
00
36012089 1998 JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 30(1):38-46
Ahmed HS
The current status of science journals published in Bangladesh
11
3710133055 2003 JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 34(4):236-248
Ahmed HS
Does peer review process exist in developing-country journals?: The Bangladesh experience
00
38002841 2002 JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 39(1):VII-VIII
Aisen ML
Judging the judges: Keeping objectivity in peer review - Guest editorial
00
39091822 1997 ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE 17(3):326-327
Ajlouni KM; AlKhalidi U
Medical records, patient outcome, and peer review in eleventh-century Arab medicine
12
400461748 1996 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF HEALTH 116(4):245-252
AlAssaf AF
Healthcare outcomes management and quality improvement
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
410111972 1998 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 73(7):756-761
Albanese M; Horowitz S; Moss R; Farrell P
An institutionally funded program for educational research and development grants: It makes dollars and sense
03
42001919 1997 LANCET 350(9080):822-822
Albert T
Why bother with peer review?
25
43002211 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 319(7213):861-861
Albert T
Personal view - Peer review: thinking the unthinkable
11
440542913 2002 REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA 34(9):851-856
Aldenkamp AP; Vermeulen J
Effects of antiepileptics drugs on cognition
00
45001061 1991 NATURE 349(6307):272-272
ALDHOUS P
PEER-REVIEW - A CLEANISH BILL OF HEALTH
00
460562233 1999 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY 15(9):847-852
Alexander FE
Clusters and clustering of childhood cancer: A review
02
470102219 1999 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS 95(1):41-48
Alexander GC; Robinette MB; Thorman JM; Lu XX
Use peer-review of chemical processes for extra safety
01
480142749 2002 BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION 30(11):749-752
Ali MY; Oyama Y; Monreal J; Winter J; Tallman M; Gordon LI; Williams S; Singhal S; Mehta J
Reassessing the definition of myeloid engraftment after autotransplantation: it is not necessary to see 0.5 X 10(9)/l neutrophils on 3 consecutive days to define myeloid recovery
01
49131821 1997 ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE 17(3):277-278
AlKawi MZ
History of medical records and peer review
00
50001948 1997 SCIENCE 275(5299):469-469
Allakhverdov A; Lawler A
Peer review lands safely in Russia
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
51031840 1997 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 314(7090):1352-1352
Allan B; Morlet N; Wormald R
Journals and the Internet - Use of the Internet for on line peer review must be explored further
02
5219474 1983 JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION 22(7):296-299
ALLBRITTEN D; MEGEL ME; BUCKLEY KA; SCALONE MRC; PANWAR S
FACULTY PEER-REVIEW - AN EVOLVING PROCESS
01
5312805 1989 ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY 125(7):1001-1002
ALLEN AD
SPEAKING OF PEER-REVIEW ...
00
540113149 2004 JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY 19(2):149-155
Allen BL; Burt P; Roychoudhury C; Chen BR
Analysis of OBQI outcomes in participating Michigan home health agencies
00
55062726 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 184(1):16-18
Allen JW; DeSimone KJ
Valid peer review for surgeons working in small hospitals
00
56002135 1998 PHYSICS WORLD 11(10):18-19
Allen L
The lottery of peer review
01
5723234 1979 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 136(4):444-447
ALLEN MG
PEER-REVIEW OF GROUP-THERAPY - WASHINGTON, DC, 1972-1977
47
581027774 1988 PSYCHIATRIC ANNALS 18(8):487-491
ALLEN MG
PSYCHIATRIC PEER-REVIEW - A CURRENT PERSPECTIVE
00
590442156 1998 STATISTICS IN MEDICINE 17(23):2661-2674
Altman DG
Statistical reviewing for medical journals
215
60042976 2003 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 326(7396):985-985
Altman DG
New edicts for letters - Restrictions should not be imposed on post-publication peer review
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
61142756 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 325(7362):492-492
Altman DG; Moher D; Schulz KF
Peer review of statistics in medical research - Reporting power calculations is important
01
62012066 1998 JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP 24(6):496-497
Altman E
Silencing scientists and scholars in other fields: Power, paradigm controls, peer review, and scholarly communication.
00
632321750 1996 LANCET 347(9012):1382-1386
Altman LK
The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review .1.
635
641411751 1996 LANCET 347(9013):1459-1463
Altman LK
The ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review .2.
528
6512944 1990 MAGNESIUM AND TRACE ELEMENTS 9(3):117-118
ALTURA BT
IS ANONYMOUS PEER-REVIEW THE BEST WAY TO REVIEW AND ACCEPT MANUSCRIPTS
00
66118841 1989 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY 7(12):1845-1851
ALVEGARD TA; BERG NO
HISTOPATHOLOGY PEER-REVIEW OF HIGH-GRADE SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMA - THE SCANDINAVIAN-SARCOMA-GROUP EXPERIENCE
249
67001208 1992 SCIENCE 258(5083):736-736
AMATO I
MATERIALS SCIENCE - ROY,RUSTUM - PR IS A BETTER SYSTEM THAN PEER-REVIEW
12
68001335 1993 SCIENCE 259(5091):14-14
AMATO I
PEER-REVIEW OR PERFORMANCE REVIEW - REPLY
00
690302271 1999 JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY 44(6):592-599
Ament L
Quality management activities in the obstetric triage setting
00
70002866 2002 MATERIALS PERFORMANCE 41(9):8-8
Amos GA
The experience of peer review
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
710152855 2002 JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH & GENDER-BASED MEDICINE 11(4):379-388
Andejeski Y; Bisceglio IT; Dickersin K; Johnson JE; Robinson SI; Smith HS; Visco FM; Rich IM
Quantitative impact of including consumers in the scientific review of breast cancer research proposals
00
7200852 1989 NATURE 339(6221):164-164
ANDERSON A
PEER-REVIEW - DOES IT WORK EFFICIENTLY
13
7302856 1989 NATURE 340(6230):173-173
ANDERSON A
PLAGIARISM CHARGE CASTS SHADOW ON PEER-REVIEW
03
74001191 1992 NATURE 357(6374):103-103
ANDERSON C
PEER-REVIEW LOSES OUT IN CONGRESSIONAL CUTTING SPREE
01
750243114 2003 WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN 31(1):296-305
Anderson DR; Cooch EG; Gutierrez RJ; Krebs CJ; Lindberg MS; Pollock KH; Ribic CA; Shenk TM
Rigorous science: suggestions on how to raise the bar
03
76041774 1996 ORTHOPEDICS 19():9-11
Anderson FA; Audet AM
Physician practices in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis: The MassPRO DVT study
013
7700695 1987 NEW SCIENTIST 115(1568):16-16
ANDERSON I
PEER-REVIEW ROCKED BY ARGUMENT OVER SEISMIC CENTER
00
78012835 2002 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION ETHICS 11(1):83-86
Anderson J
Silencing scientists and scholars in other fields: Power, paradigm controls, peer review, and scholarly communication
00
790112606 2001 JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY 34(1):41-47
Anderson ST; Pahlm O; Bacharova L; Barbagelata A; Chaitman BR; Clemmensen P; Goodman S; Heden B; Klootwijk PJ; Lauer M; MacFarlane PW; Rautaharju P; Reddy S; Selvester RH; Sgarbossa EB; Underwood D; Warner RA; Wagner GS
Standards for the function of an academic 12-lead electrocardiographic core laboratory
00
80031835 1997 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 182(9):331-331
Andlaw RJ
Peer review
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
810161711 1996 ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY 101(2):129-144
Andreassen S; Rosenfalck A; Falck B; Olesen KG; Andersen SK
Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the expert EMG assistant MUNIN
09
82001043 1991 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 44():S131-S134
ANDREWS JS
DOES GOOD PEER-REVIEW ASSURE GOOD EPIDEMIOLOGY
01
83001467 1994 PERSONNEL JOURNAL 73(1):64-64
ANFUSO D
PEER-REVIEW WARDS OFF UNIONS AND LAWSUITS
00
84173171 2004 SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL 25():S13-S17
Antony SX; Al-Hussaini A
Success of an unconventional workflow
00
8500250 1979 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 38(13):2649-2650
APIRION D
RESEARCH FUNDING AND THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM
69
8600299 1980 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 39(7):2351-2351
APIRION D
THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM - REPLY
00
87032482 1983 NUCLEAR SAFETY 24(6):792-800
APOSTOLAKIS G; GARRICK BJ; OKRENT D
ON QUALITY, PEER-REVIEW, AND THE ACHIEVEMENT OF CONSENSUS IN PROBABILISTIC RISK ANALYSIS
04
8800171 1977 HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY 28(12):914-915
ARMSTRONG B
CHAMPUS AND APA JOIN FORCES TO DEVELOP A MODEL SYSTEM OF PEER REVIEW
15
89061343 1993 SEARCH 24(4):98-100
ARMSTRONG J
REMAIN CALM - ITS ONLY PEER-REVIEW AT WORK
01
90221516 1984 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL RESPONSE MODIFIERS 3(1):10-14
ARMSTRONG JS
PEER-REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS
11
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
91111303028 2003 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH 56(1):69-84
Armstrong JS
Discovery and communication of important marketing findings - Evidence and proposals
02
9261031726 1996 INTERFACES 26(4):25-55
Armstrong JS; Arkes HR; Franke RH; Peterson RA; Armstrong JS
The Ombudsman: Management folklore and management science - On portfolio planning, escalation bias, and such
26
9307467 1983 JOURNAL OF FORECASTING 2(3):259-&
ARMSTRONG JS; LUSK EJ
THE ACCURACY OF ALTERNATIVE EXTRAPOLATION MODELS - ANALYSIS OF A FORECASTING COMPETITION THROUGH OPEN PEER-REVIEW
032
947223077 2003 MEDICINA CLINICA 121(18):690-694
Arnau C; Cobo E; Ribera JM; Cardellach F; Selva A; Urrutia A
Effect of statistical review on manuscript quality in Medicina Clinica (Barcelona): a randomized study
02
9501804 1989 ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY 125(2):285-285
ARNDT KA
PEER-REVIEW, THE ARCHIVES, AND BLANK,HARVEY
11
96031823 1997 ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY 64(5):1245-1249
Arom KV; Petersen RJ; Orszulak TA; Bolman RM; Wickstrom PH; Joyce LD; Spooner TH; Tell BL; Janey PA
Establishing and using a local/regional cardiac surgery database
09
97512408 1982 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION 57(6):481-483
ARONSON M; LAWRENCE R; TAYLOR W; DELBANCO T
PEER-REVIEW IN A PRIMARY CARE EDUCATION-PROGRAM
01
98131183 1992 M D COMPUTING 9(5):284-285
ARONSON MD
CATCH-22 IN THE ERA OF PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS
00
995202592 2001 JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE 82(12):1719-1722
Arrive L; Dono P; Lewin M; Dahan H; Monnier-Cholley L; Tubiana JM
Publication rate of papers originally presented at the National French Congress of Radiology in 1996
00
1000433144 2004 JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY 11(2):311-328
Arrowsmith J; Sisson K; Marginson P
What can 'benchmarking' offer the open method of co-ordination?
01

Page 1:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14