Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Fri Jul 9 10:35:21 2004
Topic Search: "Peer Review" plus the following:
LOCK S, 1986, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED,
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE,
BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231
COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC,

Nodes: 3179
Authors: 5486, Journals: 1041, Outer References: 34852
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by LCR.
Page 1:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1291812147 1998 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 19(3):181-211
Campanario JM
Peer review for journals as it stands today - Part 1
410
228371559 1995 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS 76():217-221
MICHELS R
PEER-REVIEW
34
3283182166 1998 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW 59(3):677-717
Noah L
Sanctifying scientific peer review: Publication as a proxy for regulatory decisionmaking
07
4261062943 2003 ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION 8(1):75-96
Hojat M; Gonnella JS; Caelleigh AS
Impartial judgment by the "gatekeepers" of science: Fallibility and accountability in the peer review process
02
5231502148 1998 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 19(4):277-306
Campanario JM
Peer review for journals as it stands today - Part 2
48
622392817 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2786-2790
Jefferson T; Wager E; Davidoff F
Measuring the quality of editorial peer review
59
721422539 2001 ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE 21(5-6):275-282
El-Munshid HA
Evaluation of peer review in biomedical publication
00
821412659 2001 PHARMACOTHERAPY 21(4):395-404
Sylvia LM; Herbel JL
Manuscript peer review - A guide for health care professionals
11
920182991 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):119-134
CICCHETTI DV
THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY INVESTIGATION
3180
1019272816 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2784-2786
Jefferson T; Alderson P; Wager E; Davidoff F
Effects of editorial peer review - A systematic review
811
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1117332051 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):214-215
Rennie D
Peer review in Prague
611
1216371777 1996 PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE 26(5):883-886
Wessely S
What do we know about peer review?
36
1316462103 1998 LANCET 352(9124):301-305
Wessely S
Peer review of grant applications: what do we know?
1016
1416472287 1999 MEDICAL HYPOTHESES 52(1):31-36
Stehbens WE
Basic philosophy and concepts underlying scientific peer review
05
1516633105 2003 SERIALS LIBRARIAN 45(2):39-59
Bachand RG; Sawallis PP
Accuracy in the identification of scholarly and peer-reviewed journals and the peer-review process across disciplines
00
161591942 1990 LIBRARY TRENDS 39(1-2):145-167
BIGGS M
THE IMPACT OF PEER-REVIEW ON INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM
27
1715282368 2000 BRAIN 123():1964-1969
Rothwell PM; Martyn CN
Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience - Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?
1321
181428504 1984 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 18(1):64-69
KOSKY R
PEER-REVIEW - A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON THE AMERICAN-EXPERIENCE 1972-1982
11
191478617 1986 CURRENT CONTENTS (32):3-12
GARFIELD E
REFEREEING AND PEER-REVIEW .2. THE RESEARCH ON REFEREEING AND ALTERNATIVES TO THE PRESENT SYSTEM
00
2014581246 1993 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 27(2):311-318
BEATSON JA; LANCASTER JE
PEER-REVIEW OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TREATMENTS IN PSYCHIATRY - A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
23
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2114222579 2001 HOSPITAL MEDICINE 62(3):172-175
Paice E
How to write a peer review
05
2214542949 2003 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION 82(10):790-802
Wagner AK; Boninger ML; Levy C; Chan L; Gater D; Kirby RL
Issues in physical medicine and rehabilitation
00
2314193032 2003 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 10(5):540-542
Ludbrook J
Peer review of biomedical manuscripts: an update
00
2413301592 1995 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 207(1):36-38
LEGENDRE AM
PEER-REVIEW OF MANUSCRIPTS FOR BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS
22
2513491943 1997 REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA 25(148):1946-1950
Shashok K
Shared responsibility in expert reviewing of original articles
01
2613422567 2001 EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS 23(4):343-364
Jayasinghe UW; Marsh HW; Bond N
Peer review in the funding of research in higher education: The Australian experience
00
2713222960 2003 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 139(12):1038-1040
Laine C; Mulrow C
Peer review: Integral to science and indispensable to Annals
00
281235669 1987 CURRENT CONTENTS (5):3-9
GARFIELD E
REFEREEING AND PEER-REVIEW .4. RESEARCH ON THE PEER-REVIEW OF GRANT PROPOSALS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT
00
2912361360 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):11-21
GOODMAN SN; BERLIN J; FLETCHER SW; FLETCHER RH
MANUSCRIPT QUALITY BEFORE AND AFTER PEER-REVIEW AND EDITING AT ANNALS OF INTERNAL-MEDICINE
2468
3012232246 1999 ITALIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY 31(8):659-662
Goldbeck-Wood S
Secrecy and openness in Peer Review - time for a change of culture?
12
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
3112152264 1999 JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE 14(10):622-624
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review
33
3212562859 2002 LEARNED PUBLISHING 15(4):247-258
Rowland F
The peer-review process
12
3311221845 1997 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 85(4):418-422
Eldredge JD
Identifying peer-reviewed journals in clinical medicine
23
3411221997 1998 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 173():110-113
Howard L; Wilkinson G
Peer review and editorial decision-making
47
3511512257 1999 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY 21(3):412-421
Cicchetti DV
Guardians of science: Fairness and reliability of peer review.
00
3611162269 1999 JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY 90(2):364-370
Firlik KS; Firlik AD
The peer-review process of the Journal of Neurosurgery
00
3711152725 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 179(6):1415-1417
Katz DS; Proto AV; Olmsted WW
Incidence and nature of unblinding by authors: Our experience at two radiology journals with double-blinded peer review policies
35
3811172764 2002 CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH 56(3):339-346
Opthof T; Coronel R; Janse MJ
The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias
00
3911202814 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2762-2765
Godlee F
Making reviewers visible - Openness, accountability, and credit
611
40111303028 2003 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH 56(1):69-84
Armstrong JS
Discovery and communication of important marketing findings - Evidence and proposals
02
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
411027774 1988 PSYCHIATRIC ANNALS 18(8):487-491
ALLEN MG
PSYCHIATRIC PEER-REVIEW - A CURRENT PERSPECTIVE
00
4210161374 1994 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 309(6948):143-144
SMITH R
PROMOTING RESEARCH INTO PEER-REVIEW
1728
4310191511 1995 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 165(3):685-688
POLAK JF
THE ROLE OF THE MANUSCRIPT REVIEWER IN THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS
37
4410511611 1995 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 70(1):100-134
CHAN EJ
THE BRAVE-NEW-WORLD OF DAUBERT - TRUE PEER-REVIEW, EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW, AND SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY
27
4510171981 1998 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL 26(3):211-214
Larson EL
Status of peer review
01
4610162006 1998 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 86(3):421-422
Homan FM
Whither peer review: Prague '97
00
4710242168 1998 ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOSOMATISCHE MEDIZIN UND PSYCHOANALYSE 44(1):88-98
Buddeberg C; Buchi S; Buddeberg-Fischer B
What is an original contribution in the fields of psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy
13
4810142204 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7175):4-5
Smith R
Opening up BMJ peer review - A beginning that should lead to complete transparency
1523
4910212206 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7175):44-45
Goldbeck-Wood S
Evidence on peer review - scientific quality control or smokescreen?
1014
5010162572 2001 FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL 7(6):521-527
Melero R; Lopez-Santovena F
Referees' attitudes toward open peer review and electronic transmission of papers
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
5110133055 2003 JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 34(4):236-248
Ahmed HS
Does peer review process exist in developing-country journals?: The Bangladesh experience
00
5210343060 2003 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY 166():279-300
Jayasinghe UW; Marsh HW; Bond N
A multilevel cross-classified modelling approach to peer review of grant proposals: the effects of assessor and researcher attributes on assessor ratings
00
53935586 1985 SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES (52):44-54
GILLESPIE GW; CHUBIN DE; KURZON GM
EXPERIENCE WITH NIH PEER-REVIEW - RESEARCHERS CYNICISM AND DESIRE FOR CHANGE
00
54926668 1987 CURRENT CONTENTS (4):3-8
GARFIELD E
REFEREEING AND PEER-REVIEW .3. HOW THE PEER-REVIEW OF RESEARCH-GRANT PROPOSALS WORKS AND WHAT SCIENTISTS SAY ABOUT IT
00
559261162 1992 ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 28(7):465-470
PUTTERMAN C
QUOTATION ACCURACY - FACT OR FICTION
00
569321352 1993 TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY 20(1):28-32
HAAGA DAF
PEER-REVIEW OF TERM PAPERS IN GRADUATE PSYCHOLOGY COURSES
15
579171565 1995 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 274(12):986-987
RENNIE D
PEER-REVIEW IN PRAGUE - THE INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS ON BIOMEDICAL PEER-REVIEW AND GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, 1997
12
589181886 1997 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 50(11):1189-1195
Hodgson C
How reliable is peer review? An examination of operating grant proposals simultaneously submitted to two similar peer review systems
12
599122054 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):234-237
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review - A randomized trial
2942
609182302 1999 PERFUSION 12(6):236-+
Resch KL; Ernst E
Peer reviewer bias against unconventional medicine?
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
619132356 2000 ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND 82(4):133-135
Earnshaw JJ; Farndon JR; Guillou PJ; Johnson CD; Murie JA; Murray GD
A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process
13
629272504 2000 SCIENTOMETRICS 47(1):11-23
Claveria LE; Guallar E; Cami J; Conde J; Pastor R; Ricoy JR; Rodriguez-Farre E; Ruiz-Palomo F; Munoz E
Does peer review predict the performance of research projects in health sciences?
00
639232731 2002 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 40(3):313-316
Callaham ML
Research into peer review and scientific publication: Journals look in the mirror
00
649572919 2002 SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 8(2):155-174
Wilson JR
Responsible authorship and peer review
00
659283168 2004 RESEARCH POLICY 33(3):443-454
Viner N; Powell P; Green R
Institutionalized biases in the award of research grants: a preliminary analysis revisiting the principle of accumulative advantage
00
66818505 1984 CANCER INVESTIGATION 2(4):311-320
LEVY JA
PEER-REVIEW - THE CONTINUAL NEED FOR REASSESSMENT
12
678221079 1991 SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES 16(3):322-341
TRAVIS GDL; COLLINS HM
NEW LIGHT ON OLD BOYS - COGNITIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL PARTICULARISM IN THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM
513
688171296 1993 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 270(23):2856-2858
RENNIE D
MORE PEERING INTO EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW
912
69891408 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):91-91
RENNIE D; FLANAGIN A
THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION
2335
708171858 1997 DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY 23(6):423-428
Salasche SJ
How to ''peer review'' a medical journal manuscript
11
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
718242693 2001 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 31(6):820-841
Langfeldt L
The decision-making constraints and processes of grant peer review, and their effects on the review outcome
01
728272746 2002 BIOSCIENCE 52(9):824-829
Liu JG; Pysarchik DT; Taylor WW
Peer review in the classroom
00
738192753 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 324(7348):1271-1273
Bacchetti P
Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem
714
748212804 2002 HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 37(2):483-498
Weingart SN; Davis RB; Palmer RH; Cahalane M; Hamel MB; Mukamal K; Phillips RS; Davies DT; Iezzoni LI
Discrepancies between explicit and implicit review: Physician and nurse assessments of complications and quality
03
758102813 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2759-2760
Rennie D
Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication
1119
768173147 2004 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE 30(1):2-11
Wood M; Roberts M; Howell B
The reliability of peer reviews of papers on information systems
00
77761279 1979 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 9(2):199-232
MITROFF II; CHUBIN DE
PEER-REVIEW AT THE NSF - DIALECTICAL POLICY ANALYSIS
1330
78722392 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285(6350):1224-1226
LOCK S
PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE
517
79729500 1984 AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST 27(5):631-648
COHEN LH; STRAUSSZERBY S
PEER-REVIEW OF PSYCHOTHERAPY
12
80739775 1988 R & D MANAGEMENT 18(4):333-340
POURIS A
PEER-REVIEW IN SCIENTIFICALLY SMALL COUNTRIES
13
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
81711909 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1317-1317
RENNIE D
EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION - THE 1ST-INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS
2948
827151143 1992 CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS 13(6):443-445
RENNIE D
SUSPENDED JUDGMENT - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - LET US PUT IT ON TRIAL
22
837141348 1993 SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-SUID-AFRIKAANSE TYDSKRIF VIR SIELKUNDE 23(1):43-48
PLUG C
THE RELIABILITY OF MANUSCRIPT EVALUATION FOR THE SOUTH-AFRICAN-JOURNAL-OF-PSYCHOLOGY
01
847491351 1993 STATISTICAL SCIENCE 8(3):310-317
COX D; GLESER L; PERLMAN M; REID N; ROEDER K
REPORT OF THE AD-HOC-COMMITTEE-ON-DOUBLE-BLIND-REFEREEING
14
857151730 1996 ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 32(7):573-575
Beritic T
Medical reviews and the importance of being a ''peer'' in science
00
867221986 1998 ANESTHESIOLOGY 89(2):507-515
Levine RD; Sugarman M; Schiller W; Weinshel S; Lehning EJ; Lagasse RS
The effect of group discussion on interrater reliability of structured peer review
25
877832192 1999 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE 25(1):7-60
Scheutzow SO
State medical peer review: High cost but no benefit - Is it time for a change?
57
887182586 2001 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 13(5):357-365
Weingart SN; Mukamal K; Davis RB; Davies DT; Palmer RH; Cahalane M; Hamel MB; Phillips RS; Iezzoni LI
Physician-reviewers' perceptions and judgments about quality of care
00
897152630 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(2):85-91
van Rooyen S
The evaluation of peer-review quality
11
907692665 2001 PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER 53(4):511-521
Berg LD
Masculinism, emplacement, and positionality in peer review
011
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
917202964 2003 ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH 34(5):439-443
Kljakovic-Gaspic M; Hren D; Marusic A; Marusic M
Peer review time: How late is late in a small medical journal?
00
927223077 2003 MEDICINA CLINICA 121(18):690-694
Arnau C; Cobo E; Ribera JM; Cardellach F; Selva A; Urrutia A
Effect of statistical review on manuscript quality in Medicina Clinica (Barcelona): a randomized study
02
937143125 2004 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 328(7441):673-675
Schroter S; Black N; Evans S; Carpenter J; Godlee F; Smith R
Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial
12
94614871 1989 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 20(1):9-16
DEWITT E
A LOOK BACKWARD - THE PEER-REVIEW PROGRAM OF THE AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL-ASSOCIATION
11
95614916 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1371-1376
MCNUTT RA; EVANS AT; FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON THE QUALITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
52104
966111172 1992 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY 14(6):976-980
CICCHETTI DV; ROURKE BP; WASS P
PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - RELEVANCE FOR RESEARCH IN CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY
12
976271258 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6893):1668-1672
GILLETT R; HARROW J
PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .1. MANAGEMENT WITHIN THE MEDICAL-RESEARCH-COUNCIL
312
986271259 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6893):1672-1675
GILLETT R; HARROW J
PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .2. IS MEDICAL-RESEARCH WELL-SERVED BY PEER-REVIEW
412
996241361 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):60-61
LOCK S
DOES EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW WORK
711
1006251414 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):143-146
FISHER M; FRIEDMAN SB; STRAUSS B
THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON ACCEPTANCE OF RESEARCH PAPERS BY PEER-REVIEW
2742

Page 1:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14