Missing Links? Citation Matrix | Graphs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
LOCK S, 1986, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED, ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66 INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686 CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE, BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231 COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC, |
Nodes: 3179
Authors: 5486,
Journals: 1041,
Outer References: 34852
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by LCR.
Page 1: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 29 | 181 | 2147 1998 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 19(3):181-211
Campanario JM Peer review for journals as it stands today - Part 1 | 4 | 10 |
2 | 28 | 37 | 1559 1995 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS 76():217-221
MICHELS R PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 4 |
3 | 28 | 318 | 2166 1998 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW 59(3):677-717
Noah L Sanctifying scientific peer review: Publication as a proxy for regulatory decisionmaking | 0 | 7 |
4 | 26 | 106 | 2943 2003 ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION 8(1):75-96
Hojat M; Gonnella JS; Caelleigh AS Impartial judgment by the "gatekeepers" of science: Fallibility and accountability in the peer review process | 0 | 2 |
5 | 23 | 150 | 2148 1998 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 19(4):277-306
Campanario JM Peer review for journals as it stands today - Part 2 | 4 | 8 |
6 | 22 | 39 | 2817 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2786-2790
Jefferson T; Wager E; Davidoff F Measuring the quality of editorial peer review | 5 | 9 |
7 | 21 | 42 | 2539 2001 ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE 21(5-6):275-282
El-Munshid HA Evaluation of peer review in biomedical publication | 0 | 0 |
8 | 21 | 41 | 2659 2001 PHARMACOTHERAPY 21(4):395-404
Sylvia LM; Herbel JL Manuscript peer review - A guide for health care professionals | 1 | 1 |
9 | 20 | 182 | 991 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):119-134
CICCHETTI DV THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY INVESTIGATION | 31 | 80 |
10 | 19 | 27 | 2816 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2784-2786
Jefferson T; Alderson P; Wager E; Davidoff F Effects of editorial peer review - A systematic review | 8 | 11 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
11 | 17 | 33 | 2051 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):214-215
Rennie D Peer review in Prague | 6 | 11 |
12 | 16 | 37 | 1777 1996 PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE 26(5):883-886
Wessely S What do we know about peer review? | 3 | 6 |
13 | 16 | 46 | 2103 1998 LANCET 352(9124):301-305
Wessely S Peer review of grant applications: what do we know? | 10 | 16 |
14 | 16 | 47 | 2287 1999 MEDICAL HYPOTHESES 52(1):31-36
Stehbens WE Basic philosophy and concepts underlying scientific peer review | 0 | 5 |
15 | 16 | 63 | 3105 2003 SERIALS LIBRARIAN 45(2):39-59
Bachand RG; Sawallis PP Accuracy in the identification of scholarly and peer-reviewed journals and the peer-review process across disciplines | 0 | 0 |
16 | 15 | 91 | 942 1990 LIBRARY TRENDS 39(1-2):145-167
BIGGS M THE IMPACT OF PEER-REVIEW ON INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM | 2 | 7 |
17 | 15 | 28 | 2368 2000 BRAIN 123():1964-1969
Rothwell PM; Martyn CN Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience - Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? | 13 | 21 |
18 | 14 | 28 | 504 1984 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 18(1):64-69
KOSKY R PEER-REVIEW - A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON THE AMERICAN-EXPERIENCE 1972-1982 | 1 | 1 |
19 | 14 | 78 | 617 1986 CURRENT CONTENTS (32):3-12
GARFIELD E REFEREEING AND PEER-REVIEW .2. THE RESEARCH ON REFEREEING AND ALTERNATIVES TO THE PRESENT SYSTEM | 0 | 0 |
20 | 14 | 58 | 1246 1993 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 27(2):311-318
BEATSON JA; LANCASTER JE PEER-REVIEW OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TREATMENTS IN PSYCHIATRY - A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE | 2 | 3 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
21 | 14 | 22 | 2579 2001 HOSPITAL MEDICINE 62(3):172-175
Paice E How to write a peer review | 0 | 5 |
22 | 14 | 54 | 2949 2003 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION 82(10):790-802
Wagner AK; Boninger ML; Levy C; Chan L; Gater D; Kirby RL Issues in physical medicine and rehabilitation | 0 | 0 |
23 | 14 | 19 | 3032 2003 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 10(5):540-542
Ludbrook J Peer review of biomedical manuscripts: an update | 0 | 0 |
24 | 13 | 30 | 1592 1995 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 207(1):36-38
LEGENDRE AM PEER-REVIEW OF MANUSCRIPTS FOR BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS | 2 | 2 |
25 | 13 | 49 | 1943 1997 REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA 25(148):1946-1950
Shashok K Shared responsibility in expert reviewing of original articles | 0 | 1 |
26 | 13 | 42 | 2567 2001 EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS 23(4):343-364
Jayasinghe UW; Marsh HW; Bond N Peer review in the funding of research in higher education: The Australian experience | 0 | 0 |
27 | 13 | 22 | 2960 2003 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 139(12):1038-1040
Laine C; Mulrow C Peer review: Integral to science and indispensable to Annals | 0 | 0 |
28 | 12 | 35 | 669 1987 CURRENT CONTENTS (5):3-9
GARFIELD E REFEREEING AND PEER-REVIEW .4. RESEARCH ON THE PEER-REVIEW OF GRANT PROPOSALS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT | 0 | 0 |
29 | 12 | 36 | 1360 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):11-21
GOODMAN SN; BERLIN J; FLETCHER SW; FLETCHER RH MANUSCRIPT QUALITY BEFORE AND AFTER PEER-REVIEW AND EDITING AT ANNALS OF INTERNAL-MEDICINE | 24 | 68 |
30 | 12 | 23 | 2246 1999 ITALIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY 31(8):659-662
Goldbeck-Wood S Secrecy and openness in Peer Review - time for a change of culture? | 1 | 2 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
31 | 12 | 15 | 2264 1999 JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE 14(10):622-624
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review | 3 | 3 |
32 | 12 | 56 | 2859 2002 LEARNED PUBLISHING 15(4):247-258
Rowland F The peer-review process | 1 | 2 |
33 | 11 | 22 | 1845 1997 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 85(4):418-422
Eldredge JD Identifying peer-reviewed journals in clinical medicine | 2 | 3 |
34 | 11 | 22 | 1997 1998 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 173():110-113
Howard L; Wilkinson G Peer review and editorial decision-making | 4 | 7 |
35 | 11 | 51 | 2257 1999 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY 21(3):412-421
Cicchetti DV Guardians of science: Fairness and reliability of peer review. | 0 | 0 |
36 | 11 | 16 | 2269 1999 JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY 90(2):364-370
Firlik KS; Firlik AD The peer-review process of the Journal of Neurosurgery | 0 | 0 |
37 | 11 | 15 | 2725 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 179(6):1415-1417
Katz DS; Proto AV; Olmsted WW Incidence and nature of unblinding by authors: Our experience at two radiology journals with double-blinded peer review policies | 3 | 5 |
38 | 11 | 17 | 2764 2002 CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH 56(3):339-346
Opthof T; Coronel R; Janse MJ The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias | 0 | 0 |
39 | 11 | 20 | 2814 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2762-2765
Godlee F Making reviewers visible - Openness, accountability, and credit | 6 | 11 |
40 | 11 | 130 | 3028 2003 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH 56(1):69-84
Armstrong JS Discovery and communication of important marketing findings - Evidence and proposals | 0 | 2 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
41 | 10 | 27 | 774 1988 PSYCHIATRIC ANNALS 18(8):487-491
ALLEN MG PSYCHIATRIC PEER-REVIEW - A CURRENT PERSPECTIVE | 0 | 0 |
42 | 10 | 16 | 1374 1994 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 309(6948):143-144
SMITH R PROMOTING RESEARCH INTO PEER-REVIEW | 17 | 28 |
43 | 10 | 19 | 1511 1995 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 165(3):685-688
POLAK JF THE ROLE OF THE MANUSCRIPT REVIEWER IN THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 3 | 7 |
44 | 10 | 51 | 1611 1995 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 70(1):100-134
CHAN EJ THE BRAVE-NEW-WORLD OF DAUBERT - TRUE PEER-REVIEW, EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW, AND SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY | 2 | 7 |
45 | 10 | 17 | 1981 1998 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL 26(3):211-214
Larson EL Status of peer review | 0 | 1 |
46 | 10 | 16 | 2006 1998 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 86(3):421-422
Homan FM Whither peer review: Prague '97 | 0 | 0 |
47 | 10 | 24 | 2168 1998 ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOSOMATISCHE MEDIZIN UND PSYCHOANALYSE 44(1):88-98
Buddeberg C; Buchi S; Buddeberg-Fischer B What is an original contribution in the fields of psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy | 1 | 3 |
48 | 10 | 14 | 2204 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7175):4-5
Smith R Opening up BMJ peer review - A beginning that should lead to complete transparency | 15 | 23 |
49 | 10 | 21 | 2206 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7175):44-45
Goldbeck-Wood S Evidence on peer review - scientific quality control or smokescreen? | 10 | 14 |
50 | 10 | 16 | 2572 2001 FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL 7(6):521-527
Melero R; Lopez-Santovena F Referees' attitudes toward open peer review and electronic transmission of papers | 0 | 0 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
51 | 10 | 13 | 3055 2003 JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 34(4):236-248
Ahmed HS Does peer review process exist in developing-country journals?: The Bangladesh experience | 0 | 0 |
52 | 10 | 34 | 3060 2003 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY 166():279-300
Jayasinghe UW; Marsh HW; Bond N A multilevel cross-classified modelling approach to peer review of grant proposals: the effects of assessor and researcher attributes on assessor ratings | 0 | 0 |
53 | 9 | 35 | 586 1985 SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES (52):44-54
GILLESPIE GW; CHUBIN DE; KURZON GM EXPERIENCE WITH NIH PEER-REVIEW - RESEARCHERS CYNICISM AND DESIRE FOR CHANGE | 0 | 0 |
54 | 9 | 26 | 668 1987 CURRENT CONTENTS (4):3-8
GARFIELD E REFEREEING AND PEER-REVIEW .3. HOW THE PEER-REVIEW OF RESEARCH-GRANT PROPOSALS WORKS AND WHAT SCIENTISTS SAY ABOUT IT | 0 | 0 |
55 | 9 | 26 | 1162 1992 ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 28(7):465-470
PUTTERMAN C QUOTATION ACCURACY - FACT OR FICTION | 0 | 0 |
56 | 9 | 32 | 1352 1993 TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY 20(1):28-32
HAAGA DAF PEER-REVIEW OF TERM PAPERS IN GRADUATE PSYCHOLOGY COURSES | 1 | 5 |
57 | 9 | 17 | 1565 1995 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 274(12):986-987
RENNIE D PEER-REVIEW IN PRAGUE - THE INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS ON BIOMEDICAL PEER-REVIEW AND GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, 1997 | 1 | 2 |
58 | 9 | 18 | 1886 1997 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 50(11):1189-1195
Hodgson C How reliable is peer review? An examination of operating grant proposals simultaneously submitted to two similar peer review systems | 1 | 2 |
59 | 9 | 12 | 2054 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):234-237
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review - A randomized trial | 29 | 42 |
60 | 9 | 18 | 2302 1999 PERFUSION 12(6):236-+
Resch KL; Ernst E Peer reviewer bias against unconventional medicine? | 0 | 0 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
61 | 9 | 13 | 2356 2000 ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND 82(4):133-135
Earnshaw JJ; Farndon JR; Guillou PJ; Johnson CD; Murie JA; Murray GD A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process | 1 | 3 |
62 | 9 | 27 | 2504 2000 SCIENTOMETRICS 47(1):11-23
Claveria LE; Guallar E; Cami J; Conde J; Pastor R; Ricoy JR; Rodriguez-Farre E; Ruiz-Palomo F; Munoz E Does peer review predict the performance of research projects in health sciences? | 0 | 0 |
63 | 9 | 23 | 2731 2002 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 40(3):313-316
Callaham ML Research into peer review and scientific publication: Journals look in the mirror | 0 | 0 |
64 | 9 | 57 | 2919 2002 SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 8(2):155-174
Wilson JR Responsible authorship and peer review | 0 | 0 |
65 | 9 | 28 | 3168 2004 RESEARCH POLICY 33(3):443-454
Viner N; Powell P; Green R Institutionalized biases in the award of research grants: a preliminary analysis revisiting the principle of accumulative advantage | 0 | 0 |
66 | 8 | 18 | 505 1984 CANCER INVESTIGATION 2(4):311-320
LEVY JA PEER-REVIEW - THE CONTINUAL NEED FOR REASSESSMENT | 1 | 2 |
67 | 8 | 22 | 1079 1991 SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES 16(3):322-341
TRAVIS GDL; COLLINS HM NEW LIGHT ON OLD BOYS - COGNITIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL PARTICULARISM IN THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM | 5 | 13 |
68 | 8 | 17 | 1296 1993 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 270(23):2856-2858
RENNIE D MORE PEERING INTO EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW | 9 | 12 |
69 | 8 | 9 | 1408 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):91-91
RENNIE D; FLANAGIN A THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION | 23 | 35 |
70 | 8 | 17 | 1858 1997 DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY 23(6):423-428
Salasche SJ How to ''peer review'' a medical journal manuscript | 1 | 1 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
71 | 8 | 24 | 2693 2001 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 31(6):820-841
Langfeldt L The decision-making constraints and processes of grant peer review, and their effects on the review outcome | 0 | 1 |
72 | 8 | 27 | 2746 2002 BIOSCIENCE 52(9):824-829
Liu JG; Pysarchik DT; Taylor WW Peer review in the classroom | 0 | 0 |
73 | 8 | 19 | 2753 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 324(7348):1271-1273
Bacchetti P Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem | 7 | 14 |
74 | 8 | 21 | 2804 2002 HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 37(2):483-498
Weingart SN; Davis RB; Palmer RH; Cahalane M; Hamel MB; Mukamal K; Phillips RS; Davies DT; Iezzoni LI Discrepancies between explicit and implicit review: Physician and nurse assessments of complications and quality | 0 | 3 |
75 | 8 | 10 | 2813 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2759-2760
Rennie D Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication | 11 | 19 |
76 | 8 | 17 | 3147 2004 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE 30(1):2-11
Wood M; Roberts M; Howell B The reliability of peer reviews of papers on information systems | 0 | 0 |
77 | 7 | 61 | 279 1979 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 9(2):199-232
MITROFF II; CHUBIN DE PEER-REVIEW AT THE NSF - DIALECTICAL POLICY ANALYSIS | 13 | 30 |
78 | 7 | 22 | 392 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285(6350):1224-1226
LOCK S PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 5 | 17 |
79 | 7 | 29 | 500 1984 AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST 27(5):631-648
COHEN LH; STRAUSSZERBY S PEER-REVIEW OF PSYCHOTHERAPY | 1 | 2 |
80 | 7 | 39 | 775 1988 R & D MANAGEMENT 18(4):333-340
POURIS A PEER-REVIEW IN SCIENTIFICALLY SMALL COUNTRIES | 1 | 3 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
81 | 7 | 11 | 909 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1317-1317
RENNIE D EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION - THE 1ST-INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS | 29 | 48 |
82 | 7 | 15 | 1143 1992 CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS 13(6):443-445
RENNIE D SUSPENDED JUDGMENT - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - LET US PUT IT ON TRIAL | 2 | 2 |
83 | 7 | 14 | 1348 1993 SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-SUID-AFRIKAANSE TYDSKRIF VIR SIELKUNDE 23(1):43-48
PLUG C THE RELIABILITY OF MANUSCRIPT EVALUATION FOR THE SOUTH-AFRICAN-JOURNAL-OF-PSYCHOLOGY | 0 | 1 |
84 | 7 | 49 | 1351 1993 STATISTICAL SCIENCE 8(3):310-317
COX D; GLESER L; PERLMAN M; REID N; ROEDER K REPORT OF THE AD-HOC-COMMITTEE-ON-DOUBLE-BLIND-REFEREEING | 1 | 4 |
85 | 7 | 15 | 1730 1996 ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 32(7):573-575
Beritic T Medical reviews and the importance of being a ''peer'' in science | 0 | 0 |
86 | 7 | 22 | 1986 1998 ANESTHESIOLOGY 89(2):507-515
Levine RD; Sugarman M; Schiller W; Weinshel S; Lehning EJ; Lagasse RS The effect of group discussion on interrater reliability of structured peer review | 2 | 5 |
87 | 7 | 83 | 2192 1999 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE 25(1):7-60
Scheutzow SO State medical peer review: High cost but no benefit - Is it time for a change? | 5 | 7 |
88 | 7 | 18 | 2586 2001 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 13(5):357-365
Weingart SN; Mukamal K; Davis RB; Davies DT; Palmer RH; Cahalane M; Hamel MB; Phillips RS; Iezzoni LI Physician-reviewers' perceptions and judgments about quality of care | 0 | 0 |
89 | 7 | 15 | 2630 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(2):85-91
van Rooyen S The evaluation of peer-review quality | 1 | 1 |
90 | 7 | 69 | 2665 2001 PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER 53(4):511-521
Berg LD Masculinism, emplacement, and positionality in peer review | 0 | 11 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
91 | 7 | 20 | 2964 2003 ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH 34(5):439-443
Kljakovic-Gaspic M; Hren D; Marusic A; Marusic M Peer review time: How late is late in a small medical journal? | 0 | 0 |
92 | 7 | 22 | 3077 2003 MEDICINA CLINICA 121(18):690-694
Arnau C; Cobo E; Ribera JM; Cardellach F; Selva A; Urrutia A Effect of statistical review on manuscript quality in Medicina Clinica (Barcelona): a randomized study | 0 | 2 |
93 | 7 | 14 | 3125 2004 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 328(7441):673-675
Schroter S; Black N; Evans S; Carpenter J; Godlee F; Smith R Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial | 1 | 2 |
94 | 6 | 14 | 871 1989 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 20(1):9-16
DEWITT E A LOOK BACKWARD - THE PEER-REVIEW PROGRAM OF THE AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL-ASSOCIATION | 1 | 1 |
95 | 6 | 14 | 916 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1371-1376
MCNUTT RA; EVANS AT; FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON THE QUALITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL | 52 | 104 |
96 | 6 | 11 | 1172 1992 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY 14(6):976-980
CICCHETTI DV; ROURKE BP; WASS P PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - RELEVANCE FOR RESEARCH IN CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY | 1 | 2 |
97 | 6 | 27 | 1258 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6893):1668-1672
GILLETT R; HARROW J PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .1. MANAGEMENT WITHIN THE MEDICAL-RESEARCH-COUNCIL | 3 | 12 |
98 | 6 | 27 | 1259 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6893):1672-1675
GILLETT R; HARROW J PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .2. IS MEDICAL-RESEARCH WELL-SERVED BY PEER-REVIEW | 4 | 12 |
99 | 6 | 24 | 1361 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):60-61
LOCK S DOES EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW WORK | 7 | 11 |
100 | 6 | 25 | 1414 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):143-146
FISHER M; FRIEDMAN SB; STRAUSS B THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON ACCEPTANCE OF RESEARCH PAPERS BY PEER-REVIEW | 27 | 42 |
Page 1: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
Generated by:
HistCite(Vlad).
Version: 2004.05.14