| Missing Links? Citation Matrix | Graphs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
|
LOCK S, 1986, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED, ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66 INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686 CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE, BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231 COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC, |
Nodes: 3179
Authors: 5486,
Journals: 1041,
Outer References: 34852
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by LCS.
Page 1: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 611 1986 Book 1(1):1-
Lock S A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine | 75 | 204 | |
| 2 | 4 | 60 | 366 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):187-195
PETERS DP; CECI SJ PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNALS - THE FATE OF ACCEPTED, PUBLISHED ARTICLES, SUBMITTED AGAIN | 56 | 232 |
| 3 | 6 | 14 | 916 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1371-1376
MCNUTT RA; EVANS AT; FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON THE QUALITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL | 52 | 104 |
| 4 | 1 | 24 | 919 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1438-1441
HORROBIN DF THE PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS OF PEER-REVIEW AND THE SUPPRESSION OF INNOVATION | 41 | 99 |
| 5 | 2 | 5 | 357 1981 SCIENCE 214(4523):881-886
COLE S; COLE JR; SIMON GA CHANCE AND CONSENSUS IN PEER-REVIEW | 39 | 142 |
| 6 | 0 | 65 | 12 1971 MINERVA 9(1):66-100
ZUCKERMAN H; MERTON RK PATTERNS OF EVALUATION IN SCIENCE - INSTITUTIONALISATION, STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF REFEREE SYSTEM | 38 | 288 |
| 7 | 3 | 28 | 572 1985 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 312(10):654-657
BAILAR JC; PATTERSON K JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW - THE NEED FOR A RESEARCH AGENDA | 37 | 63 |
| 8 | 3 | 39 | 1164 1992 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 267(7):958-960
GOLDMAN RL THE RELIABILITY OF PEER ASSESSMENTS OF QUALITY OF CARE | 33 | 115 |
| 9 | 20 | 182 | 991 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):119-134
CICCHETTI DV THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY INVESTIGATION | 31 | 80 |
| 10 | 0 | 897 1990 Book 1(1):1-267
Chubin DE; Hackett EJ Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy | 30 | 77 | |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 11 | 5 | 14 | 1410 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):96-97
KASSIRER JP; CAMPION EW PEER-REVIEW - CRUDE AND UNDERSTUDIED, BUT INDISPENSABLE | 30 | 50 |
| 12 | 7 | 11 | 909 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1317-1317
RENNIE D EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION - THE 1ST-INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS | 29 | 48 |
| 13 | 9 | 12 | 2054 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):234-237
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review - A randomized trial | 29 | 42 |
| 14 | 1 | 4 | 56 1974 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 56(5):686-692
INGELFINGER FJ PEER REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION | 28 | 76 |
| 15 | 6 | 25 | 1414 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):143-146
FISHER M; FRIEDMAN SB; STRAUSS B THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON ACCEPTANCE OF RESEARCH PAPERS BY PEER-REVIEW | 27 | 42 |
| 16 | 2 | 7 | 2053 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):231-233
Black N; van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Smith R; Evans S What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? | 26 | 40 |
| 17 | 3 | 8 | 624 1986 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 256(17):2391-2392
RENNIE D GUARDING THE GUARDIANS - A CONFERENCE ON EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW | 25 | 47 |
| 18 | 4 | 21 | 1165 1992 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 267(17):2349-2354
RUBIN HR; ROGERS WH; KAHN KL; RUBENSTEIN LV; BROOK RH WATCHING THE DOCTOR-WATCHERS - HOW WELL DO PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATION METHODS DETECT HOSPITAL-CARE QUALITY PROBLEMS | 24 | 98 |
| 19 | 12 | 36 | 1360 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):11-21
GOODMAN SN; BERLIN J; FLETCHER SW; FLETCHER RH MANUSCRIPT QUALITY BEFORE AND AFTER PEER-REVIEW AND EDITING AT ANNALS OF INTERNAL-MEDICINE | 24 | 68 |
| 20 | 2 | 6 | 2055 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):237-240
Godlee F; Gale CR; Martyn CN Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports - A randomized controlled trial | 24 | 45 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 21 | 1 | 6 | 2056 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):240-242
Justice AC; Cho MK; Winker MA; Berlin JA; Rennie D; PEER Investigators Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? - A randomized controlled trial | 24 | 39 |
| 22 | 0 | 210 1978 Book 1(1):1-
Cole S Peer review in the National Science Foundation: phase one of a study: prepared for the Committee on Science and Public Policy of the National Academy of Sciences | 23 | 53 | |
| 23 | 8 | 9 | 1408 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):91-91
RENNIE D; FLANAGIN A THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION | 23 | 35 |
| 24 | 0 | 7 | 910 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1321-1322
KRONICK DA PEER-REVIEW IN 18TH-CENTURY SCIENTIFIC JOURNALISM | 22 | 35 |
| 25 | 5 | 11 | 2205 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7175):23-27
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Black N; Smith R Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial | 22 | 27 |
| 26 | 2 | 88 | 911 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1323-1329
BURNHAM JC THE EVOLUTION OF EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW | 21 | 35 |
| 27 | 2 | 14 | 1924 1997 NATURE 387(6631):341-343
Wenneras C; Wold A Nepotism and sexism in peer-review | 18 | 97 |
| 28 | 2 | 10 | 866 1989 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 321(12):827-829
RELMAN AS; ANGELL M HOW GOOD IS PEER-REVIEW | 17 | 39 |
| 29 | 4 | 22 | 1238 1993 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 118(7):550-556
HAYWARD RA; MCMAHON LF; BERNARD AM EVALUATING THE CARE OF GENERAL MEDICINE INPATIENTS - HOW GOOD IS IMPLICIT REVIEW | 17 | 49 |
| 30 | 10 | 16 | 1374 1994 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 309(6948):143-144
SMITH R PROMOTING RESEARCH INTO PEER-REVIEW | 17 | 28 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 31 | 0 | 12 | 44 1973 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 288(25):1323-1329
BROOK RH; APPEL FA QUALITY-OF-CARE ASSESSMENT - CHOOSING A METHOD FOR PEER REVIEW | 15 | 207 |
| 32 | 0 | 5 | 1415 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):147-149
LABAND DN; PIETTE MJ A CITATION ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF BLINDED PEER-REVIEW | 15 | 23 |
| 33 | 10 | 14 | 2204 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7175):4-5
Smith R Opening up BMJ peer review - A beginning that should lead to complete transparency | 15 | 23 |
| 34 | 0 | 3 | 196 1977 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN 237(4):34-41
COLE S; RUBIN L; COLE JR PEER REVIEW AND SUPPORT OF SCIENCE | 14 | 51 |
| 35 | 1 | 8 | 913 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1344-1347
WELLER AC EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN UNITED-STATES MEDICAL JOURNALS | 14 | 32 |
| 36 | 1 | 40 | 1044 1991 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 44(1):91-98
OXMAN AD; GUYATT GH; SINGER J; GOLDSMITH CH; HUTCHISON BG; MILNER RA; STREINER DL AGREEMENT AMONG REVIEWERS OF REVIEW ARTICLES | 14 | 64 |
| 37 | 1 | 17 | 1752 1996 LANCET 348(9037):1293-1295
Horrobin DF Peer review of grant applications: A harbinger for mediocrity in clinical research? | 14 | 24 |
| 38 | 3 | 11 | 1753 1996 LANCET 348(9040):1480-1483
Pierie JPEN; Walvoort HC; Overbeke AJPM Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde | 14 | 23 |
| 39 | 1 | 3 | 1844 1997 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 315(7111):759-760
Smith R Peer review: Reform or revolution? | 14 | 29 |
| 40 | 7 | 61 | 279 1979 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 9(2):199-232
MITROFF II; CHUBIN DE PEER-REVIEW AT THE NSF - DIALECTICAL POLICY ANALYSIS | 13 | 30 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 41 | 15 | 28 | 2368 2000 BRAIN 123():1964-1969
Rothwell PM; Martyn CN Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience - Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? | 13 | 21 |
| 42 | 0 | 3 | 1074 1991 RADIOLOGY 178(3):637-642
SIEGELMAN SS ASSASSINS AND ZEALOTS - VARIATIONS IN PEER-REVIEW - SPECIAL REPORT | 12 | 26 |
| 43 | 5 | 14 | 1413 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):139-142
GILBERT JR; WILLIAMS ES; LUNDBERG GD IS THERE GENDER BIAS IN JAMAS PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 12 | 25 |
| 44 | 0 | 0 | 470 1983 JOURNAL OF NEUROBIOLOGY 14(2):95-112
OSMOND DH MALICES WONDERLAND - RESEARCH FUNDING AND PEER-REVIEW | 11 | 24 |
| 45 | 3 | 5 | 2057 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):243-245
Cho MK; Justice AC; Winker MA; Berlin JA; Waeckerle JF; Callaham ML; Rennie D; PEER Investigators Masking author identity in peer review - What factors influence masking success? | 11 | 19 |
| 46 | 4 | 14 | 2258 1999 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 52(7):625-629
van Rooyen S; Black N; Godlee F Development of the Review Quality Instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts | 11 | 16 |
| 47 | 8 | 10 | 2813 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2759-2760
Rennie D Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication | 11 | 19 |
| 48 | 1 | 77 | 577 1985 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 313(18):1131-1137
DANS PE; WEINER JP; OTTER SE PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS - PROMISES AND POTENTIAL PITFALLS | 10 | 46 |
| 49 | 4 | 20 | 662 1987 CHEST 91(2):252-255
ROBIN ED; BURKE CM PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICAL JOURNALS | 10 | 14 |
| 50 | 0 | 1 | 1295 1993 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 270(23):2775-&
COTTON P FLAWS DOCUMENTED, REFORMS DEBATED AT CONGRESS ON JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW | 10 | 10 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 51 | 4 | 7 | 2050 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):213-213
Rennie D; Flanagin A Congress on Biomedical Peer Review - History, ethics, and plans for the future | 10 | 24 |
| 52 | 16 | 46 | 2103 1998 LANCET 352(9124):301-305
Wessely S Peer review of grant applications: what do we know? | 10 | 16 |
| 53 | 10 | 21 | 2206 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7175):44-45
Goldbeck-Wood S Evidence on peer review - scientific quality control or smokescreen? | 10 | 14 |
| 54 | 2 | 53 | 260 1979 MEDICAL CARE 17(3):1-73
HULKA BS; ROMM FJ; PARKERSON GR; RUSSELL IT; CLAPP NE; JOHNSON FS PEER REVIEW IN AMBULATORY CARE - USE OF EXPLICIT CRITERIA AND IMPLICIT JUDGMENTS | 9 | 59 |
| 55 | 0 | 0 | 375 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):217-218
HORROBIN DF PEER-REVIEW - A PHILOSOPHICALLY FAULTY CONCEPT WHICH IS PROVING DISASTROUS FOR SCIENCE | 9 | 20 |
| 56 | 0 | 20 | 844 1989 JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION 57(2):151-169
MARSH HW; BALL S THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS USED TO EVALUATE MANUSCRIPTS SUBMITTED TO ACADEMIC JOURNALS - INTERJUDGMENTAL RELIABILITY | 9 | 16 |
| 57 | 0 | 15 | 915 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1353-1354
EVANS JT; NADJARI HI; BURCHELL SA QUOTATIONAL AND REFERENCE ACCURACY IN SURGICAL JOURNALS - A CONTINUING PEER-REVIEW PROBLEM | 9 | 60 |
| 58 | 8 | 17 | 1296 1993 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 270(23):2856-2858
RENNIE D MORE PEERING INTO EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW | 9 | 12 |
| 59 | 0 | 14 | 1412 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):119-121
ROBERTS JC; FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW EFFECTS OF PEER-REVIEW AND EDITING ON THE READABILITY OF ARTICLES PUBLISHED IN ANNALS OF INTERNAL-MEDICINE | 9 | 26 |
| 60 | 0 | 0 | 874 1989 SCIENCE 244(4907):910-912
SUN M PEER-REVIEW COMES UNDER PEER-REVIEW | 8 | 16 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 61 | 0 | 0 | 993 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):137-137
BAILAR JC RELIABILITY, FAIRNESS, OBJECTIVITY, AND OTHER INAPPROPRIATE GOALS IN PEER-REVIEW | 8 | 11 |
| 62 | 5 | 67 | 1388 1994 EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 17(1):3-21
GOLDMAN RL THE RELIABILITY OF PEER ASSESSMENTS - A METAANALYSIS | 8 | 12 |
| 63 | 4 | 31 | 1409 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):92-94
JUDSON HF STRUCTURAL TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE SCIENCES AND THE END OF PEER-REVIEW | 8 | 21 |
| 64 | 1 | 9 | 1417 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):154-156
SCHULMAN K; SULMASY DP; RONEY D ETHICS, ECONOMICS, AND THE PUBLICATION POLICIES OF MAJOR MEDICAL JOURNALS | 8 | 23 |
| 65 | 1 | 26 | 1419 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):158-162
SCHERER RW; DICKERSIN K; LANGENBERG P FULL PUBLICATION OF RESULTS INITIALLY PRESENTED IN ABSTRACTS - A METAANALYSIS | 8 | 96 |
| 66 | 0 | 0 | 1580 1995 JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE 10(8):443-450
WILKES MS; KRAVITZ RL POLICIES, PRACTICES, AND ATTITUDES OF NORTH-AMERICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL EDITORS | 8 | 23 |
| 67 | 5 | 10 | 1988 1998 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 128(1):66-68
Davidoff F Masking, blinding, and peer review: The blind leading the blinded | 8 | 15 |
| 68 | 2 | 2 | 1998 1998 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 316(7125):86-86
Goldbeck-Wood S What makes a good reviewer of manuscripts? The BMJ invites you to join its peer review process | 8 | 16 |
| 69 | 19 | 27 | 2816 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2784-2786
Jefferson T; Alderson P; Wager E; Davidoff F Effects of editorial peer review - A systematic review | 8 | 11 |
| 70 | 0 | 8 | 274 1979 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 10(4):631-639
CLAIBORN WL; STRICKER G PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS, PEER-REVIEW, AND CHAMPUS | 7 | 11 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 71 | 1 | 10 | 336 1981 JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY 49(4):583-589
COHEN LH; OYSTERNELSON CK CLINICIANS EVALUATIONS OF PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY - EXPERIMENTAL-DATA ON PSYCHOLOGICAL PEER-REVIEW | 7 | 16 |
| 72 | 1 | 12 | 399 1982 BULLETIN OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY 2(5):405-422
ROY R PEER-REVIEW OF PROPOSALS - RATIONALE, PRACTICE AND PERFORMANCE | 7 | 15 |
| 73 | 0 | 0 | 531 1984 SCIENCE 226(4681):1401-1401
CULLITON BJ FINE-TUNING PEER-REVIEW | 7 | 8 |
| 74 | 5 | 27 | 739 1988 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 296(6624):774-777
SMITH R RESEARCH POLICY - PROBLEMS WITH PEER-REVIEW AND ALTERNATIVES | 7 | 17 |
| 75 | 3 | 15 | 912 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1330-1332
KNOLL E THE COMMUNITIES OF SCIENTISTS AND JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW | 7 | 12 |
| 76 | 0 | 0 | 975 1990 WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 153(5):520-522
RELMAN AS PEER-REVIEW IN SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS - WHAT GOOD IS IT | 7 | 11 |
| 77 | 1 | 63 | 1009 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):167-186
CICCHETTI DV REFLECTIONS FROM THE PEER-REVIEW MIRROR | 7 | 11 |
| 78 | 0 | 8 | 1119 1992 ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY 3(3):187-191
DEBELLEFEUILLE C; MORRISON CA; TANNOCK IF THE FATE OF ABSTRACTS SUBMITTED TO A CANCER MEETING - FACTORS WHICH INFLUENCE PRESENTATION AND SUBSEQUENT PUBLICATION | 7 | 35 |
| 79 | 6 | 24 | 1361 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):60-61
LOCK S DOES EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW WORK | 7 | 11 |
| 80 | 6 | 9 | 1416 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):152-153
SWEITZER BJ; CULLEN DJ HOW WELL DOES A JOURNALS PEER-REVIEW PROCESS FUNCTION - A SURVEY OF AUTHORS OPINIONS | 7 | 11 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 81 | 0 | 2 | 1418 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):156-158
COLAIANNI LA PEER-REVIEW IN JOURNALS INDEXED IN INDEX-MEDICUS | 7 | 12 |
| 82 | 2 | 19 | 1437 1994 JOURNAL OF LABORATORY AND CLINICAL MEDICINE 124(2):178-182
ERNST E; RESCH KL REVIEWER BIAS - A BLINDED EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY | 7 | 12 |
| 83 | 4 | 20 | 1882 1997 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 278(19):1573-1578
Smith MA; Atherly AJ; Kane RL; Pacala JT Peer review of the quality of care - Reliability and sources of variability for outcome and process assessments | 7 | 24 |
| 84 | 3 | 13 | 1987 1998 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 32(3):318-322
Callaham ML; Wears RL; Waeckerle JF Effect of attendance at a training session on peer reviewer quality and performance | 7 | 7 |
| 85 | 3 | 17 | 2058 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):257-259
Weber EJ; Callaham ML; Wears RL; Barton C; Young G Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting - Why investigators fail to publish | 7 | 35 |
| 86 | 4 | 11 | 2104 1998 LANCET 352(9126):441-445
Bingham CM; Higgins G; Coleman R; Van Der Weyden MB The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study | 7 | 18 |
| 87 | 5 | 8 | 2370 2000 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 176():47-51
Walsh E; Rooney M; Appleby L; Wilkinson G Open peer review: a randomised controlled trial | 7 | 11 |
| 88 | 8 | 19 | 2753 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 324(7348):1271-1273
Bacchetti P Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem | 7 | 14 |
| 89 | 1 | 4 | 115 1976 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 133(8):891-895
LUFT LL; SAMPSON LM; NEWMAN DE EFFECTS OF PEER REVIEW ON OUTPATIENT PSYCHOTHERAPY - THERAPIST AND PATIENT FOLLOW-UP SURVEY | 6 | 13 |
| 90 | 0 | 0 | 250 1979 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 38(13):2649-2650
APIRION D RESEARCH FUNDING AND THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM | 6 | 9 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 91 | 1 | 8 | 389 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):246-252
PETERS DP; CECI SJ PEER-REVIEW RESEARCH - OBJECTIONS AND OBLIGATIONS | 6 | 10 |
| 92 | 1 | 8 | 736 1988 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 109(3):181-181
RENNIE D; KNOLL E INVESTIGATING PEER-REVIEW | 6 | 8 |
| 93 | 0 | 0 | 754 1988 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 260(18):2690-2693
MAYER W; CLINTON JJ; NEWHALL D A 1ST REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EXTERNAL CIVILIAN PEER-REVIEW OF MEDICAL-CARE | 6 | 9 |
| 94 | 2 | 33 | 1089 1991 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 21(1):111-132
ABRAMS PA THE PREDICTIVE ABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW OF GRANT PROPOSALS - THE CASE OF ECOLOGY AND THE UNITED-STATES-NATIONAL-SCIENCE-FOUNDATION | 6 | 9 |
| 95 | 1 | 27 | 1235 1993 ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION IN ENGLISH 32(2):234-238
DANIEL HD AN EVALUATION OF THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS AT ANGEWANDTE-CHEMIE | 6 | 8 |
| 96 | 0 | 3 | 1313 1993 NATURE 363(6427):296-296
ERNST E; SARADETH T; RESCH KL DRAWBACKS OF PEER-REVIEW | 6 | 18 |
| 97 | 2 | 15 | 1411 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):105-107
ABBY M; MASSEY MD; GALANDIUK S; POLK HC PEER-REVIEW IS AN EFFECTIVE SCREENING PROCESS TO EVALUATE MEDICAL MANUSCRIPTS | 6 | 17 |
| 98 | 2 | 32 | 1750 1996 LANCET 347(9012):1382-1386
Altman LK The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review .1. | 6 | 35 |
| 99 | 1 | 3 | 1776 1996 PREVENTIVE MEDICINE 25(2):102-104
Frank E Editors' requests of peer reviewers: A study and a proposal | 6 | 7 |
| 100 | 0 | 0 | 1881 1997 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 278(17):1389-1391
Stephenson J Medical journals turn gaze inward to examine process of peer review | 6 | 8 |
Page 1: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad).
Version: 2004.05.14