Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Fri Jul 9 10:35:16 2004
Topic Search: "Peer Review" plus the following:
LOCK S, 1986, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED,
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE,
BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231
COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC,

Nodes: 3179
Authors: 5486, Journals: 1041, Outer References: 34852
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by NCR.
Page 23:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2201012217 1999 CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS 77(31):19-19
[Anon]
NIH panel proposes changes for peer review
00
2202012224 1999 COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES 60(6):604-605
Finnegan GA
Silencing scientists and scholars in other fields: Power, paradigm controls, peer review, and scholarly communication.
00
2203012230 1999 CURRENT SCIENCE 77(11):1384-1385
Roy R
Freeing science from the tyrannies of funding and peer review
00
2204012236 1999 GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY 16(2):193-195
Relyea HC
Silencing scientists and scholars in other fields: Power, paradigm controls, peer review, and scholarly communication.
00
2205012290 1999 NATURE 398(6730):738-738
Reichhardt T
NASA's plan to hire peer-review contractor raises scientists' fears
00
2206012292 1999 NATURE 400(6744):491-491
Saegusa A
Asia backs E-Biomed 'with peer review'
01
2207012293 1999 NATURE 401(6749):111-111
Fainzilber M
A science-oriented search engine could solve web problems ... just try to be specific ... using peer review as a guide to quality
01
2208012322 1999 SCIENTIST 13(17):5-5
Russo E
NIH to revise the peer review process
00
2209012373 2000 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY 16(6):814-814
Smith ER
Integrity of the peer review process
00
2210112424 2000 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 283(7):886-886
Warren E
The National Practitioner Data Bank and the quality of peer review
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2211012430 2000 JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME 82A(9):1361-1362
Gordon LH
Peer review
00
2212012449 2000 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY 36(7):2347-2347
Parmley WW
Clinical peer review or competitive hatchet job
01
2213012459 2000 LANCET 355(9204):660-660
Phillips M
Peer review
01
2214012461 2000 LIBRARY QUARTERLY 70(1):163-166
Lievrouw LA
Silencing scientists and scholars in other fields: Power, paradigm controls, peer review, and scholarly communication.
01
2215012484 2000 PHYSICA B 284():2055-2056
Liu FC; Adriaans MJ; Israelsson UE
Scientific research on LTMPF on the International Space Station
01
2216112501 2000 SCIENTIST 14(6):4-4
Kostoff RN
Bypassing peer review
23
2217112503 2000 SCIENTIST 14(8):6-6
Berezin AA
From peer review to peer recommendation
00
2218112514 2000 TROPICAL DOCTOR 30(3):129-129
Jones M
Tropical Doctor opens up peer review
00
2219012527 2001 ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA 104(4):319-319
Munk-Jorgensen P
Peer review in health sciences
00
2220012576 2001 HEALTH PHYSICS 81(5):592-592
Eichholz GG
An international peer review of the biosphere modelling programme of the US Department of Energy's Yucca Mountain site characterization project
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2221012577 2001 HEALTH PHYSICS 81(6):670-677
Merwin SE; Moeller DW; Kennedy WE; Moeller MP
Application of the Supreme Court's Daubert criteria in radiation litigation
01
2222012593 2001 JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE 7(1):1-3
Jobst KA
Rigor and compassion: The paradoxical challenge of peer review
07
2223012610 2001 JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME 26A(5):811-812
[Anon]
Use and misuse of peer review publications
00
2224112617 2001 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING 8(3):168-168
McCann J; Britton PD; Warren RML; Hunnam G
Radiological peer review of interval cancers in the East Anglian breast screening programme: what are we missing (vol 8, pg 77, 2001)
00
2225012625 2001 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 52(11):984-985
Stirling DA
Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses.
00
2226012657 2001 ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW 25(6):409-409
Calvert P
Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses
00
2227112687 2001 SCIENTIST 15(23):6-6
Hallman G
Peer review
00
2228112747 2002 BLOOD CELLS MOLECULES AND DISEASES 28(1):91-91
Lichtman MA; Oakes D
The productivity and impact of the leukemia & lymphoma society scholar program: The apparent positive effect of peer review (vol 27, pg 1020, 2001)
00
2229112754 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 325(7362):491-491
Zwarenstein M
Peer review of statistics in medical research - Journal reviewers are even more baffled by sample size issues than grant proposal reviewers
02
2230112755 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 325(7362):491-492
Horrobin DF
Peer review of statistics in medical research - Rationale for requiring power calculations is needed
03
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2231112758 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 325(7362):493-493
Barton GA
Peer review of statistics in medical research - Reviewers' contributions should be thoughtful, constructive, and encouraging
00
2232112759 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 325(7362):493-493
Fox M
Peer review of statistics in medical research - Suggested solution may, partly solve other problem
00
2233012770 2002 COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES 63(2):205-206
Shiflett L
Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses.
00
2234012801 2002 GYNAKOLOGE 35(5):453-457
Thornton J
European journals in obstetrics, gynaecology and related fields
00
2235012802 2002 HEALTH PHYSICS 83(1):135-135
Eichholz GG
An international peer review of the Yucca Mountain Project TSPA-SR
00
2236012835 2002 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION ETHICS 11(1):83-86
Anderson J
Silencing scientists and scholars in other fields: Power, paradigm controls, peer review, and scholarly communication
00
2237012860 2002 LEARNED PUBLISHING 15(4):312-312
Paulus K
How to survive peer review
00
2238012861 2002 LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH 24(3):305-305
Weller A
Editorial peer review, its strengths and weaknesses (vol 23, pg 37, 2001)
00
2239012878 2002 NATURE 416(6878):258-260
Gura T
Peer review, unmasked
59
2240012950 2003 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 168(3):397-397
Druce HM
Peer review and manuscript triage
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2241012953 2003 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 181(3):649-653
Berlin L
Performance improvement and peer-review - Activities: Are they immune from legal discovery?
00
2242112974 2003 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 326(7393):824-824
Brown HM
Peer review should not be anonymous
00
2243012985 2003 CHEMISTRY & INDUSTRY (18):5-5
[Anon]
Study - Ecstasy mix-up casts doubt over peer review
00
2244013026 2003 ISIS 94(3):552-553
Chalk R
Silencing scientists and scholars in other fields: Power, paradigm controls, peer review, and scholarly communication.
00
2245113061 2003 JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 126(6):1681-1682
Wechsler AS; Fried PW
Peer review
00
2246013065 2003 LANCET NEUROLOGY 2(9):517-517
[Anon]
Peer review - reject, accept, or major revision?
00
2247013079 2003 NATURE 421(6919):111-111
Dominiczak MH
Funding should recognize the value of peer review
02
2248013080 2003 NATURE 422(6933):661-661
Newmark P
Peer review and the rewards of open access
00
2249013081 2003 NATURE 423(6936):116-116
van Loon AJ
Peer review: recognition via year-end statements
00
2250013087 2003 ORTHOPEDICS 26(10):1000-+
Sullivan JA
The current impossibility of peer review
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2251013097 2003 READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY 38(2):168-171
Reinking D; Alvermann DE
The RRQ peer-review process
00
2252013102 2003 SCIENTIST 17(6):19-19
Mota M
Reviewing peer review
00
2253013159 2004 NATURE 428(6980):255-255
Cintas P
Confidential reports may improve peer review
00
2254013173 2004 SCIENCE 303(5664):1595-1595
Couzin J
Biodefense - US agencies unveil plan for biosecurity peer review
00
2255001 1969 FDA PAPERS 3(9):4-&
HAMPSHIR.GD
NAS-NRC DRUG EFFICACY STUDY - PEER REVIEW
01
2256008 1971 ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY 104(4):343-&
WAISMAN M
PEER REVIEW
11
2257009 1971 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION 46(7):634-&
NORRIS FS
CONTROL OF MALPRACTICE BY PEER REVIEW
00
22580015 1971 NEW YORK STATE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 71(21):2584-&
MARBACH B
WHY NOT PEER REVIEW
00
22590016 1971 SCIENCE 173(3992):106-&
GROSS J
PEER REVIEW SYSTEM
00
22600017 1972 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND ARCHIVES OF AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OPTOMETRY 49(10):884-&
WERNER DL
PEER REVIEW IN AN INSTITUTIONAL SETTING EXPERIENCE AT OPTOMETRIC CENTER OF NEW YORK
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
22610018 1972 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND ARCHIVES OF AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OPTOMETRY 49(11):976-&
ROSENTHA.J; FOLSOM W; BERNSTEI.M
SURVEY OF SPECTACLE PRESCRIBING BY OPTOMETRIST - AN INSTRUMENT FOR PEER REVIEW
00
22620019 1972 CALIFORNIA MEDICINE 117(2):66-&
SOLARI RA
PEER REVIEW
00
22630020 1972 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS 13(5):782-&
MORRIS RC
GUIDELINES FOR ACCEPTING VOLUNTEERS - CONSENT, ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS, AND FUNCTION OF A PEER REVIEW
05
22640022 1972 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 219(8):1060-&
SCHLESS JM
PEER REVIEW AS AN EDUCATIONAL CHALLENGE
37
22650023 1972 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATION NS12(4):166-&
LAVENTUR.M
UTILIZATION AND PEER REVIEW BY PHARMACISTS
03
22660024 1972 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATION NS12(4):171-&
BOISSERE.VR
CASE STUDY IN PEER REVIEW
00
22670025 1973 AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN 7(4):29-29
BHASIN R
PEER REVIEW PROGRESS
00
22680029 1973 CALIFORNIA MEDICINE 119(6):58-59
[Anon]
WHERE WE STAND - CMA POSITION PAPERS - QUALITY MEDICAL-CARE - PEER REVIEW, CONTINUING MEDICAL-EDUCATION
00
22690031 1973 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 109(2):120-121
DEVITT JE
BLOOD WASTAGE AND CHOLECYSTECTOMY - SPIN-OFF FROM A PEER REVIEW
113
22700032 1973 CANCER RESEARCH 33(4):919-919
VIVONA S; DOVANQUY D
COMPARABILITY OF AMERICAN-CANCER-SOCIETY AND NATIONAL-INSTITUTES-OF-HEALTH PEER REVIEW SYSTEMS
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
22710033 1973 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 32(8):1827-1827
LEPOW IH
CRISIS OF PEER REVIEW SYSTEM
00
22720038 1973 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 225(7):731-732
HOWARD RW
PEER REVIEW - EDUCATIONAL NECESSITY
00
22730039 1973 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 225(10):1240-1241
PAGE IH
DIFFERENT PEER REVIEW
00
22740041 1973 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION 86(5):960-961
[Anon]
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH CONFERENCE EXPLORES PEER REVIEW, MANPOWER PLANNING, RESPONSIBILITY TO CONSUMERS
00
22750042 1973 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION 63(1):47-48
WINTERFE.E
CURRENT CONCERNS OF CONSULTANT DIETITIAN .4. DIETETIC ASSOCIATIONS PEER-REVIEW-COMMITTEE
01
22760045 1973 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 289(19):1045-1045
DUNPHY JE
PEER REVIEW OR FEDERAL PEERING
00
22770046 1973 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 289(19):1045-1045
GILSON SB
PEER REVIEW OR FEDERAL PEERING
00
22780047 1973 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 289(19):1045-1046
SADE RM
PEER REVIEW OR FEDERAL PEERING
00
22790049 1973 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 289(19):1046-1046
WELCH CE
PEER REVIEW OR FEDERAL PEERING - REPLY
00
22800051 1973 SCIENCE 179(4079):1181-1182
PARLEE MB
OBJECTIVITY OF PEER REVIEW SYSTEM
12
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
22810052 1973 SCIENCE 180(4088):843-844
CULLITON BJ
PEER REVIEW - OMB MAY DISMANTLE NIH STUDY SECTIONS
02
22820053 1973 SCIENCE 180(4090):1035-1036
CULLITON BJ
PEER REVIEW - EDWARDS DENIES SYSTEM WILL BE UNDONE
00
22830057 1974 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING 74(1):63-67
RAMPHAL M
PEER REVIEW
26
22840061 1974 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 131(12):1382-1384
SPIEGEL JP; HAMMERSL.DW
PEER REVIEW - OBLIGATION FOR PSYCHIATRISTS
00
22850062 1974 ARCHIVES OF SURGERY 108(4):397-398
MOORE FD
PEER REVIEW AND ALL THAT - 3 LITTLE WORDS
01
22860065 1974 CONNECTICUT MEDICINE 38(7):357-358
MOORE FD
PEER REVIEW AND ALL THAT - 3 LITTLE WORDS
00
22870069 1974 HOSPITAL PRACTICE 9(9):195-&
[Anon]
PEER REVIEW SPURS MONITORING OF PHYSICIAN PRESCRIBING HABITS
00
22880073 1974 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION 65(6):654-656
WINTERFE.E
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS (PSROS) .1. PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS AND PEER REVIEW
04
22890074 1974 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION 45(1):23-24
HUNTER EL
TREND =6 - INCREASED USE OF PEER REVIEW PROCESS
00
22900075 1974 MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA 1(7):240-240
SPICER GL
RACGP AND PEER REVIEW
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
22910079 1974 PENNSYLVANIA MEDICINE 77(9):68-68
GOODMAN L
COMMENTS ON PSRO AND PEER REVIEW
00
22920080 1974 PHYSICAL THERAPY 54(9):943-948
HIGHTOWE.AB; GRIFFIN JW
PEER REVIEW - ADVENTURE IN REAL LIFE
00
22930083 1974 SURGERY GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS 138(5):760-760
MITCHELL JH
PROBLEMS WITH PEER REVIEW
00
22940084 1974 VIRGINIA MEDICAL 101(1):56-57
KELLY CJ
PEER REVIEW AND MEDICARE
00
22950087 1975 AMERICAN SCIENTIST 63(6):624-626
BOWERS R
PEER REVIEW SYSTEM ON TRIAL
24
22960088 1975 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 47(12):1881-1881
LAITINEN HA
PEER REVIEW SYSTEM
00
22970091 1975 BULLETIN OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE 51(6):754-759
POST J
PEER REVIEW
11
22980096 1975 JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 114(1):111-113
CULP DA
TECHNIQUE FOR PEER REVIEW
00
22990098 1975 NATURE 258(5534):382-382
NORMAN C
PEER-REVIEW UNDER REVIEW
00
23000099 1975 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 293(26):1371-1372
INGELFINGER FJ
CHARITY AND PEER REVIEW IN PUBLICATION
315

Page 23:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14