| Missing Links? Citation Matrix | Graphs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
|
LOCK S, 1986, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED, ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66 INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686 CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE, BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231 COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC, |
Nodes: 3179
Authors: 5486,
Journals: 1041,
Outer References: 34852
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by NCR.
Page 19: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1801 | 0 | 2 | 21 1972 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND NEW DRUGS 12(10):407-&
CATHCART HR PEER REVIEW CONTROL OF DRUG UTILIZATION IN TEACHING HOSPITALS | 0 | 1 |
| 1802 | 0 | 2 | 35 1973 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 224(6):884-885
PETERSON P TEACHING PEER REVIEW | 4 | 15 |
| 1803 | 0 | 2 | 81 1974 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 5(1):51-58
MCMILLAN JJ PEER REVIEW AND PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR PSYCHOLOGISTS RENDERING PERSONAL HEALTH SERVICES | 0 | 8 |
| 1804 | 0 | 2 | 95 1975 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION 50(10):976-977
HADAMARD A; FINK S; DAUM SW; MICHEL RD NEW TOOL FOR PROGRAM-EVALUATION - CONSULTANT PEER REVIEW | 0 | 2 |
| 1805 | 0 | 2 | 108 1975 SCIENCE 189(4201):435-437
WALSH J NSF PEER REVIEW HEARINGS - HOUSE PANEL STARTS WITH CRITICS | 0 | 7 |
| 1806 | 0 | 2 | 192 1977 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 296(21):1230-1231
ENGEBRETSEN B PEER REVIEW IN GRADUATE-EDUCATION | 4 | 7 |
| 1807 | 0 | 2 | 202 1978 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY 32(2):118-118
OSTROW PC SUBJECTIVE-OBJECTIVE PEER REVIEW PROCEDURES | 0 | 0 |
| 1808 | 0 | 2 | 209 1978 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 1(6115):769-770
KNIGHT J LETTER FROM ... VICTORIA - PEER REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1809 | 0 | 2 | 222 1978 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE 29(5):260-260
KOCHEN M WRITING QUALITY AND PEER REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1810 | 0 | 2 | 230 1979 AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL 97(2):265-266
BURCH GE PEER REVIEW | 1 | 1 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 1811 | 0 | 2 | 236 1979 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGIST 14(4):215-218
HILLER DV; DILLINGHAM HC IMPACT OF RIGHT-OF-ACCESS UPON PEER-REVIEW - EDITORIAL ESSAY | 0 | 0 |
| 1812 | 0 | 2 | 259 1979 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY 18(2):391-400
STEVENSON K; MACKEY W; TUCKER L CHILD-PSYCHIATRY PERSPECTIVES - PROBLEMS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF PEER-REVIEW IN CHILD-PSYCHIATRY | 0 | 1 |
| 1813 | 0 | 2 | 360 1981 SCIENCE 214(4527):1294-1294
CRONBACH LJ THE PEER-REVIEW QUESTION | 0 | 0 |
| 1814 | 1 | 2 | 369 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):203-204
BLISSETT M PEER-REVIEW AND THE STRUCTURE OF KNOWLEDGE | 0 | 0 |
| 1815 | 0 | 2 | 395 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285(6353):1501-1501
MOFFAT DB PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 0 | 0 |
| 1816 | 0 | 2 | 397 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285(6353):1501-1501
COTES JE PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 0 | 0 |
| 1817 | 0 | 2 | 427 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13(1):105-111
LASSEN CL THE COLORADO MEDICARE STUDY - PERSPECTIVE OF THE PEER-REVIEW COMMITTEE | 0 | 2 |
| 1818 | 1 | 2 | 444 1983 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 74(3):494-495
DIXON GF; SCHONFELD SA; ALTMAN M; WHITCOMB ME THE PEER-REVIEW AND EDITORIAL PROCESS - A LIMITED EVALUATION | 1 | 1 |
| 1819 | 2 | 2 | 449 1983 BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY 70(11):697-697
NEGUS D PEER-REVIEW - SHOULD IT BE BLIND | 0 | 0 |
| 1820 | 1 | 2 | 475 1983 JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY 10(3):358-359
MCDUFFIE FC SHORT CUTS FOR PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 1821 | 0 | 2 | 493 1983 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 64(3):80-80
VANRENSBURG LJ PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1822 | 2 | 2 | 494 1983 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 64(7):226-227
[Anon] IDEAS ABOUT PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1823 | 0 | 2 | 497 1983 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 64(21):807-807
MAARTENS R PEER-REVIEW - ARE WE HANGING THE RIGHT MAN | 0 | 0 |
| 1824 | 0 | 2 | 508 1984 EMPLOYEE RELATIONS LAW JOURNAL 9(4):659-671
COOMBE JD PEER-REVIEW - THE EMERGING SUCCESSFUL APPLICATION | 1 | 5 |
| 1825 | 0 | 2 | 515 1984 JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY 157(1):88-&
SAXLEHNER AC; HURDMAN M PEER-REVIEW - THE FOUNDATION OF SELF-REGULATION | 0 | 0 |
| 1826 | 0 | 2 | 528 1984 PHYSICS TODAY 37(11):192-192
DAVIS HL PEER-REVIEW NEEDS MORE SUPPORT FROM CONGRESS | 0 | 0 |
| 1827 | 0 | 2 | 535 1984 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 66(15):554-554
MULLER FJ ANTIBIOTICS AND PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1828 | 0 | 2 | 546 1985 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 290(6483):1743-1743
EBAN R PEER-REVIEW AT WORK | 0 | 1 |
| 1829 | 0 | 2 | 548 1985 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 290(6486):1984-1984
CAMPBELL MJ PEER-REVIEW AT WORK | 0 | 1 |
| 1830 | 0 | 2 | 556 1985 HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY 36(5):517-520
SHEPHERD GL FORMATS FOR PEER-REVIEW OF DYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY | 2 | 3 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 1831 | 0 | 2 | 601 1986 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 143(11):1476-1477
SHARFSTEIN SS PSYCHIATRIC PEER-REVIEW - PRELUDE AND PROMISE - HAMILTON,JM | 0 | 0 |
| 1832 | 0 | 2 | 607 1986 BIOSCIENCE 36(9):598-598
SPITLER AL PORK BARREL OR PEER-REVIEW - THE WAR IN CONGRESS CONTINUES | 0 | 0 |
| 1833 | 0 | 2 | 612 1986 CHEST 89(3):323-324
SOFFER A MEET THE PRESS - AND IGNORE PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1834 | 0 | 2 | 663 1987 CHEST 92(5):958-958
VEVAINA JR RISK-BENEFITS OF PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 1 |
| 1835 | 0 | 2 | 685 1987 JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION 17(11):34-38
DAVIS SE A PROFESSIONAL RECOGNITION SYSTEM USING PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 1 |
| 1836 | 0 | 2 | 691 1987 M D COMPUTING 4(4):6-7
MCDONALD CJ PEER-REVIEW AND MD COMPUTING | 0 | 2 |
| 1837 | 0 | 2 | 706 1987 PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS 60(3):1049-1050
MCINTOSH EG; ROSS S PEER-REVIEW IN PSYCHOLOGY - INSTITUTIONAL RANKING AS A FACTOR | 0 | 1 |
| 1838 | 0 | 2 | 711 1987 SCIENCE 238(4826):448-448
KINNEY TB PEER-REVIEW AT THE AGRICULTURAL-RESEARCH-SERVICE | 0 | 0 |
| 1839 | 1 | 2 | 715 1987 SCIENTIST 1(12):10-10
WOLMAN M CAN PEER-REVIEW BE IMPROVED | 1 | 1 |
| 1840 | 1 | 2 | 744 1988 DRUG INTELLIGENCE & CLINICAL PHARMACY 22(12):1006-1006
SHAUGHNESSY AF BLIND PEER-REVIEW OF JOURNAL ARTICLES - COMMENT | 1 | 2 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 1841 | 1 | 2 | 753 1988 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 260(12):1761-1761
WILLIAMS E THE PROCESS OF PEER-REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPTS | 1 | 2 |
| 1842 | 0 | 2 | 768 1988 LANCET 1(8585):596-596
DOUGLASWILSON I PEER-REVIEW AND THE LANCET | 0 | 0 |
| 1843 | 0 | 2 | 778 1988 SCHWEIZERISCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT 118(8):255-256
[Anon] ON OUR OWN BEHALF - SAFEGUARDING QUALITY OF MEDICAL-JOURNALS THROUGH PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1844 | 0 | 2 | 788 1988 SCIENTIST 2(18):12-12
GIBSON WC PERILS OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1845 | 1 | 2 | 805 1989 ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY 125(7):1001-1002
ALLEN AD SPEAKING OF PEER-REVIEW ... | 0 | 0 |
| 1846 | 0 | 2 | 808 1989 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 298(6688):1645-1645
BROOKS T PEER-REVIEW FOR HOSPITALS | 0 | 0 |
| 1847 | 1 | 2 | 834 1989 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 262(14):1950-1951
MERRY MD THE DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE EXTERNAL CIVILIAN PEER-REVIEW OF MEDICAL-CARE | 0 | 0 |
| 1848 | 0 | 2 | 836 1989 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 262(14):1951-1951
TORMA MJ THE DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE EXTERNAL CIVILIAN PEER-REVIEW OF MEDICAL-CARE | 0 | 0 |
| 1849 | 0 | 2 | 837 1989 JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY 167(4):96-&
EVERS CJ; PEARSON DB LESSONS LEARNED FROM PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1850 | 0 | 2 | 845 1989 JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR 30(3):R4-R5
[Anon] PEER-REVIEW ALWAYS HELPS BUT NEVER CURES | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 1851 | 0 | 2 | 856 1989 NATURE 340(6230):173-173
ANDERSON A PLAGIARISM CHARGE CASTS SHADOW ON PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 3 |
| 1852 | 0 | 2 | 862 1989 NATURE 341(6240):275-275
VISVANATHAN KV PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1853 | 0 | 2 | 867 1989 NEW SCIENTIST 123(1674):24-24
GAVAGHAN H POACHED PAPER CHALLENGES PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 0 | 0 |
| 1854 | 0 | 2 | 876 1989 SCIENTIST 3(7):1-&
LIVERSIDGE A PNAS PUBLICATION OF AIDS ARTICLE SPURS DEBATE OVER PEER-REVIEW - IS THE NATIONAL ACADEMY TO BE PRAISED OR CHASTENED FOR DISSEMINATING THE VIEWS OF CONTROVERSIAL SCIENTIST DUESBERG,PETER | 0 | 0 |
| 1855 | 0 | 2 | 877 1989 SCIENTIST 3(16):13-13
FORSDYKE DR PEER-REVIEW POLICY | 1 | 1 |
| 1856 | 0 | 2 | 883 1989 TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES 14(6):213-213
MADDOX J PEER-REVIEW AND PUBLISHING | 0 | 0 |
| 1857 | 2 | 2 | 906 1990 CURRENT SCIENCE 59(10):492-492
PANDALAI KAV PEER-REVIEW - REPLY | 0 | 0 |
| 1858 | 0 | 2 | 939 1990 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY 1(2):125-126
GRANTHAM JJ PEER-REVIEW OF MANUSCRIPTS - RIGHT AND RESPONSIBILITY | 0 | 1 |
| 1859 | 0 | 2 | 941 1990 LABOR LAW JOURNAL 41(6):364-369
ROBINSON RK; FRANKLIN GM; ALLEN BM UNIVERSITY-OF-PENNSYLVANIA V EEOC - THE DEMISE OF ACADEMIC-FREEDOM PRIVILEGE IN THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 1 | 1 |
| 1860 | 1 | 2 | 944 1990 MAGNESIUM AND TRACE ELEMENTS 9(3):117-118
ALTURA BT IS ANONYMOUS PEER-REVIEW THE BEST WAY TO REVIEW AND ACCEPT MANUSCRIPTS | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 1861 | 0 | 2 | 947 1990 NATURE 347(6292):418-418
CALNE R MRC AND PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1862 | 0 | 2 | 1007 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):164-164
TYRER P CHAIRMANS ACTION - THE IMPORTANCE OF EXECUTIVE DECISIONS IN PEER-REVIEW | 2 | 2 |
| 1863 | 1 | 2 | 1045 1991 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 44(4-5):339-341
FEINSTEIN AR CONSTRUCTION, CONSENT, AND CONDEMNATION IN RESEARCH ON PEER-REVIEW | 2 | 6 |
| 1864 | 0 | 2 | 1080 1991 SCIENTIST 5(1):6-&
MERVIS J NIH FINE-TUNES PEER-REVIEW TO CLARIFY LONG-TERM FUNDING | 0 | 0 |
| 1865 | 0 | 2 | 1082 1991 SCIENTOMETRICS 21(2):171-179
ZHU J; MEADOWS AJ; MASON G CITATIONS AND DEPARTMENTAL RESEARCH RATINGS | 0 | 4 |
| 1866 | 0 | 2 | 1087 1991 SERIALS LIBRARIAN 19(3-4):91-94
DANCIK BP THE IMPORTANCE OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 1 |
| 1867 | 0 | 2 | 1148 1992 DIABETES CARE 15(1):54-58
OMALLEY BC MEDICARE ADMISSION CRITERIA FOR DIABETES-MELLITUS IN FLORIDA | 0 | 0 |
| 1868 | 0 | 2 | 1173 1992 JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION 48(3):336-338
DAVENPORT E PEERLESS SCIENCE - PEER-REVIEW AND UNITED-STATES SCIENCE POLICY - CHUBIN,DE, HACKETT,EJ | 0 | 0 |
| 1869 | 0 | 2 | 1223 1992 ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EXPERIMENTELLE UND ANGEWANDTE PSYCHOLOGIE 39(1):R3-R5
DROSLER J PEER-REVIEW AND MAJORITY-RULE | 0 | 0 |
| 1870 | 0 | 2 | 1229 1993 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 161(5):1101-1103
FRANK MS; MANN FA; GILLESPY T QUALITY ASSURANCE - A SYSTEM THAT INTEGRATES A DIGITAL DICTATION SYSTEM WITH A COMPUTER-DATA BASE | 1 | 2 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 1871 | 0 | 2 | 1265 1993 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 149(7):928-928
FREI JV PEER-REVIEW ANONYMITY | 0 | 1 |
| 1872 | 0 | 2 | 1284 1993 HASTINGS CENTER REPORT 23(5):16-19
FINS JJ PRAXIS MAKES PERFECT | 0 | 1 |
| 1873 | 0 | 2 | 1307 1993 LANCET 342(8882):1293-1293
BRAHAMS D PEER-REVIEW OF A LONDON HOSPITAL | 0 | 0 |
| 1874 | 0 | 2 | 1340 1993 SCIENTIST 7(17):11-&
ROY R SCIENCE PUBLISHING IS URGENTLY IN NEED OF MAJOR REFORM | 1 | 1 |
| 1875 | 1 | 2 | 1377 1994 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 309(6953):539-539
FURNESS P PROMOTING RESEARCH INTO PEER-REVIEW - REFEREES SHOULD PROVIDE REFERENCES | 0 | 0 |
| 1876 | 0 | 2 | 1406 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 271(22):1769-1771
WITTE MH; BORGS P; WAY DL; BERNAS M; RAMIREZ G; WITTE CL KAPOSIS-SARCOMA, VASCULAR-PERMEABILITY, AND SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY | 0 | 6 |
| 1877 | 0 | 2 | 1418 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):156-158
COLAIANNI LA PEER-REVIEW IN JOURNALS INDEXED IN INDEX-MEDICUS | 7 | 12 |
| 1878 | 0 | 2 | 1460 1994 NATURE 370(6486):170-171
DICKSON D PEER-REVIEW - NIH URGED TO STREAMLINE BIDS ... AS BRITAIN SEEKS TO REASSURE DOUBTERS OVER POLICY CHANGES | 0 | 0 |
| 1879 | 0 | 2 | 1618 1995 OPHTHALMOLOGY 102(3):369-370
MINCKLER D PURE PREVIEW AND PEER-REVIEW - OPHTHALMOLOGY WORLD NEWS AND OPHTHALMOLOGY | 0 | 0 |
| 1880 | 1 | 2 | 1670 1996 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 172(2):224-224
Scher KS Making peer review statistically accountable - Reply | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 1881 | 1 | 2 | 1674 1996 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 28(1):75-77
Waeckerle JF; Callaham ML Medical journals and the science of peer review: Raising the standard | 2 | 2 |
| 1882 | 0 | 2 | 1700 1996 CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS 74(7):4-&
Adebodun F Peer review reform | 0 | 0 |
| 1883 | 0 | 2 | 1765 1996 NATURE 384(6608):401-401
Henneberg M A case for instant peer review? | 0 | 2 |
| 1884 | 0 | 2 | 1780 1996 REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH 66(4):417-421
Murray FB; Raths J Factors in the peer review of reviews | 0 | 3 |
| 1885 | 0 | 2 | 1790 1996 SCIENCE 273(5279):1162-1164
Marshall E Trial set to focus on peer review | 0 | 3 |
| 1886 | 0 | 2 | 1813 1997 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 72(6):558-558
Baume P; Jones K A study of peer-review marking reveals weaknesses | 0 | 0 |
| 1887 | 0 | 2 | 1866 1997 EQUINE VETERINARY JOURNAL 29(1):5-5
Rossdale PD Volume 28: Continuing progress, peer review and clinical content | 0 | 2 |
| 1888 | 0 | 2 | 1869 1997 GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL 131(3):423-424
Wyss M; Booth DC The IASPEI procedure for the evaluation of earthquake precursors | 0 | 12 |
| 1889 | 0 | 2 | 1920 1997 LEARNED PUBLISHING 10(2):157-159
Wood D Electronic submission and peer review - An update on the ESPERE project | 1 | 3 |
| 1890 | 0 | 2 | 1921 1997 MEDICAL CARE 35(4):301-302
Neuhauser D Peer review and the research commons - A problem of success | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 1891 | 1 | 2 | 1938 1997 PHYSICS TODAY 50(3):102-+
Kostoff RN Four factors and one criterion are key to improving peer review | 0 | 0 |
| 1892 | 2 | 2 | 1978 1998 ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION 19(1):S57-S61
Lightfoot JT A different method of teaching peer review systems | 0 | 0 |
| 1893 | 0 | 2 | 1982 1998 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 170(4):1110-1111
Beall DP Importance of peer review immunity protection in resident evaluations | 0 | 0 |
| 1894 | 2 | 2 | 1998 1998 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 316(7125):86-86
Goldbeck-Wood S What makes a good reviewer of manuscripts? The BMJ invites you to join its peer review process | 8 | 16 |
| 1895 | 0 | 2 | 2094 1998 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW 26(2):305-314
Sadoff RL The practice of forensic psychiatry: Perils, problems, and pitfalls | 0 | 0 |
| 1896 | 0 | 2 | 2101 1998 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE 91(12):652-653
Stebbing J Studs, the Ordernet and peer review | 0 | 0 |
| 1897 | 2 | 2 | 2105 1998 LANCET 352(9133):1063-1063
Fielder A; Vinyard H Peer review of grant applications | 0 | 0 |
| 1898 | 1 | 2 | 2106 1998 LANCET 352(9133):1063-1064
Swift M Peer review of grant applications | 2 | 2 |
| 1899 | 1 | 2 | 2107 1998 LANCET 352(9133):1064-1064
Moseley MJ Peer review of grant applications | 0 | 0 |
| 1900 | 0 | 2 | 2198 1999 ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY 36():316-322
Challand GS Assessing the quality of comments on reports: a retrospective study | 1 | 9 |
Page 19: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad).
Version: 2004.05.14