Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Fri Jul 9 10:35:34 2004
Topic Search: "Peer Review" plus the following:
LOCK S, 1986, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED,
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE,
BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231
COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC,

Nodes: 3179
Authors: 5486, Journals: 1041, Outer References: 34852
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by LCS.
Page 28:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2701012657 2001 ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW 25(6):409-409
Calvert P
Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses
00
27020222658 2001 PALLIATIVE MEDICINE 15(1):49-54
Hargreaves PN; Peppiatt R
Is videotaping of consultations acceptable to patients attending a hospice day centre?
00
27030192660 2001 PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE 23(2):41-45
King MA; Roberts MS
Multidisciplinary case conference reviews: improving outcomes for nursing home residents, carers and health professionals
03
27041222661 2001 PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE 23(3):111-115
Radley A; Millar B; Hamley J
Development of patient-centred performance indicators to guide the delivery of pharmaceutical care in a district general hospital
00
2705022662 2001 PHYSICA MEDICA 17():90-91
Lewis CA
Recognition of the qualified expert in the United Kingdom
00
27060192663 2001 PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 108(2):460-465
Zbar RIS; Otake LR; Miller MJ; Persing JA; Dingman DL
Web-based medicine as a means to establish centers of surgical excellence in the developing world
00
27070722664 2001 POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY 22(2):293-308
Cole ER; Stewart AJ
Invidious comparisons: Imagining a psychology of race and gender beyond differences
04
27087692665 2001 PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER 53(4):511-521
Berg LD
Masculinism, emplacement, and positionality in peer review
011
2709002666 2001 PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS 34(1):1-1
Singer JD
Micromanagement and peer review
01
2710022667 2001 PSYCOLOQUY 12(12):1-4
Turner R
An end to great publishing myths - Book review of Tenopir and King on electronic-journals
03
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2711032668 2001 PSYCOLOQUY 12(19):art. no.-11
Meyer J
Scientific journals by and for scientists - Book review of Tenopir and King on electronic journals
00
2712032669 2001 PSYCOLOQUY 12(21):1-3
Mills ME
Authors of the world unite: Liberating academic content from publishers' restrictions - Book review of Tenopir & King on Electronic Journals
00
2713042670 2001 PSYCOLOQUY 12(22):1-4
Oullier O; Michel-Kerjan E
Does scientific publication need a peer consensus? Commentary on Stodolsky on consensus-journals
00
2714152671 2001 PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS 116():254-256
Sattin RW
The prevention research initiative and the peer review process at CDC
01
27150492672 2001 QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 10(3):166-172
Katbamna S; Baker R; Ahmad W; Bhakta P; Parker G
Development of guidelines to facilitate improved support of South Asian carers by primary health care teams
02
27160252673 2001 RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS 32(1):27-51
Baliga S; Sjostrom T
Optimal design of peer review and self-assessment schemes
01
27170212674 2001 REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY 33(1):60-65
Hofelt CS; Honeycutt M; McCoy JT; Haws LC
Development of a metabolism factor for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons for use in multipathway risk assessments of hazardous waste combustion facilities
01
27180232675 2001 REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY 34(3):249-257
Sailstad DM; Hattan D; Hill RN; Stokes WS
ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay - I. The ICCVAM review process
06
27190622676 2001 REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY 34(3):258-273
Dean JH; Twerdok LE; Tice RR; Sailstad DM; Hattan DG; Stokes WS
ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay - II. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel
011
2720292677 2001 RESEARCH POLICY 30(3):357-361
Rinia EJ; van Leeuwen TN; van Vuren HG; van Raan AFJ
Influence of interdisciplinarity on peer-review and bibliometric evaluations in physics research
02
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2721002679 2001 SCIENCE 291(5506):959-959
Pokrovsky V
Russian science - Danger to peer review is in eye of beholder
00
2722002680 2001 SCIENCE 291(5513):2533-+
Mervis J
Peer review - NSF scores low on using own criteria
00
2723002681 2001 SCIENCE 293(5533):1234-1234
Marshall E
Biomedical policy - NIH wins an exemption from HHS peer-review overhaul
00
27246292684 2001 SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 7(2):193-204
Atkinson M
'Peer review' culture
00
2725022685 2001 SCIENTIST 15(15):6-6
Berezin AA
Peer review: Open, not anonymous
00
2726112687 2001 SCIENTIST 15(23):6-6
Hallman G
Peer review
00
27270292688 2001 SCIENTOMETRICS 50(1):83-98
Noyons E
Bibliometric mapping of science in a science policy context
08
27282212689 2001 SCIENTOMETRICS 50(3):523-537
Hornbostel S
Third party funding of German universities. An indicator of research activity?
00
2729062690 2001 SCIENTOMETRICS 51(1):311-318
Schwechheimer H; Winterhager M
Mapping interdisciplinary research fronts in neuroscience: A bibliometric view to retrograde amnesia
02
2730032691 2001 SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 46(6):165-166
Wilson SM; Burke G
Clinical standards board for Scotland: Peer review visit
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
27311332692 2001 SOCIAL PROBLEMS 48(1):93-110
Miller J; Perrucci R
Back stage at Social Problems: An analysis of the editorial decision process, 1993-1996
02
27328242693 2001 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 31(6):820-841
Langfeldt L
The decision-making constraints and processes of grant peer review, and their effects on the review outcome
01
2733032694 2001 SOCIETY 38(2):47-54
Henderson A
Undermining peer review
00
27340312695 2001 SURGERY 129(6):655-661
Schein M; Paladugu R
Redundant surgical publications: Tip of the iceberg?
06
27350192696 2001 TAXON 50(2):381-387
Wilson HD
Informatics: new media and paths of data flow
06
2736002697 2001 TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION 48(3):261-262
Hayhoe GF
Something so right: Why i'm proud of our review process
00
2737052698 2001 TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY 29():20-23
Popp JA
Criteria for the evaluation of studies in transgenic models
05
2738092699 2001 TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES 61(2):201-210
Haseman JK; Bailer AJ; Kodell RL; Morris R; Portier K
Statistical issues in the analysis of low-dose endocrine disruptor data
06
27390842700 2001 TOXICOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL HEALTH 17(5-10):163-175
Birak P; Yurk J; Adeshina F; Lorber M; Pollard K; Choudhury H; Kroner S
Travis and Arms revisited: a second look at a widely used bioconcentration algorithm
01
27400112701 2001 TRANSFUSION 41(5):587-590
Saxena S; Wehrli G; Makarewicz K; Sartorelli J; Shulman IA
Monitoring for underutilization of RBC components and platelets
02
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2741002702 2001 TRANSFUSION 41(9):135S-136S
Chapman JF; Cook R
Peer review of blood stocks management in hospitals and a blood service using an innovative web based data management system
00
27420102704 2001 WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 44(11-12):295-302
Goforth GF
Surmounting the engineering challenges of Everglades restoration
00
27430422705 2001 WRITTEN COMMUNICATION 18(2):107-179
Wiemelt J
Toward an activity-based conception of writing and school writing contexts
00
2744002706 2002 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 223():U187-U188
Coppola BP
Technologies for student-generated work in a peer-led, peer-review instructional environment.
00
2745002707 2002 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 223():U188-U188
Stewart IC; Coppola BP
Technologies for student-generated work in a peer-led, peer-review instructional environment.
00
2746002708 2002 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 223():U189-U189
Manning T
Teaching undergraduate research at the peer review label.
00
2747002709 2002 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 224():U296-U296
Orth DL; Ryter AW
Incorporation of calibrated peer review writing assignments in general chemistry laboratory and introductory chemistry courses.
00
2748002710 2002 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 224():U296-U296
Wimpfheimer T
Using calibrated peer review (CPR) in small classes at Salem State College.
00
2749002711 2002 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 224():U296-U297
Sady MB; Russell AA; Su TM
Calibrated peer review assignment: Identify a chemical.
00
27500152712 2002 ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 9(3):248-250
Marco CA; Larkin GL; Silbergleit R
Filming of patients in academic emergency departments
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
27513252713 2002 ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 9(11):1300-1304
Rodgers KG; Manifold C
360-degree feedback: Possibilities for assessment of the ACGME core competencies for emergency medicine residents
01
2752082714 2002 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 77(10):S7-S9
Richards BF; Moran BJ; Friedland JA; Kirkland RT; Searle NS; Coburn M
A criterion-based, peer review process for assessing the scholarship of educational leadership
00
27533142715 2002 ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY 26(4):221-222
Roberts LW
On the centrality of peer review
00
27540242716 2002 ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION 26(3):174-184
Pelaez NJ
Problem-based writing with peer review improves academic performance in physiology
00
27550492717 2002 AIDS 16():S76-S82
Paiva V; Ayres JR; Buchalla CM; Hearst N
Building partnerships to respond to HIV/AIDS: non-governmental organizations and universities
00
27560142718 2002 ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS 16():S18-S28
Van Eldik LJ; Koppal T; Watterson DM
Barriers to Alzheimer disease drug discovery and development in academia
00
2757002719 2002 AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL 144(5):931-931
Karp HR; Larson-Jones BJ
Improving the quality of the continuum of care provided by home health agencies for patients with cardiovascular disease: The design of a pilot project being conducted by a peer review organization
00
27580172720 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY 17(5):171-174
Gruber T; Rudnitsky B
Can we be certain of PRO accuracy and accountability? Inaccurate "report cards" generated by Medicare claims data as a marker for laboratory testing in diabetic patients
00
275902002721 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 186(5):S31-S68
Lieberman E; O'Donoghue C
Unintended effects of epidural analgesia during labor: A systematic review
014
2760002722 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 134(5):744-745
Liesegang TJ
The American Journal of Ophthalmology announces online submission and peer review process
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
27610102723 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE 23(1):43-46
Maglione MA; Stone EG; Shekelle PG
Mass mailings have little effect on utilization of influenza vaccine among medicare beneficiaries
02
2762062726 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 184(1):16-18
Allen JW; DeSimone KJ
Valid peer review for surgeons working in small hospitals
00
2763162728 2002 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 57(3):202-205
Newcombe NS
Five commandments for APA
01
2764002729 2002 AMERICAN SCIENTIST 90(2):106-106
Fox MA
In praise of peer review
00
27650142730 2002 ANESTHESIOLOGY 97(1):1-3
Warltier DC; Kersten JR; Pagel PS; Gross GJ
Anesthetic preconditioning: Serendipity and science
09
27669232731 2002 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 40(3):313-316
Callaham ML
Research into peer review and scientific publication: Journals look in the mirror
00
27670162735 2002 ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY 49(5):460-465
Jejurikar SS; Rovak JM; Kuzon WM; Chung KC; Kotsis SV; Cederna PS
Evaluation of plastic surgery information on the Internet
00
27684252736 2002 ANNALS OF SURGERY 236(3):277-287
Rangel SJ; Efron B; Moss RL
Recent trends in National Institutes of Health funding of surgical research
02
27691202737 2002 ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE 126(6):706-709
Sun CCJ; Revell VO; Belli AJ; Viscardi RM
Discrepancy in pathologic diagnosis of placental lesions
02
27700472738 2002 ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION 83(6):776-783
Light CM; Chappell PH; Kyberd PJ
Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: Normative data, reliability, and validity
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
27710202739 2002 ARCHIVES OF SURGERY 137(4):413-416
Hyman N; Labow SB; Vermont Chapter Amer Coll Surgeons
The Vermont colorectal cancer project - Self-portrait
00
27721322740 2002 ARCHIVOS DE BRONCONEUMOLOGIA 38(12):574-579
Quinones D; Llorca J; Prieto-Salceda D; Delgado-Rodriguez M
Quality of clinical trials published in Spain on asthma in comparison to trials in English language journals
01
2773002741 2002 ASIST 2002: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 65TH ASIST ANNUAL MEETING, VOL 39, 2002 39():452-453
Hurd J; Brown CM; Bartlett J; Krietz P; Paris G
The role of "unpublished" research in the scholarly communication of scientists: Digital preprints and bioinformation databases - Sponsored by SIG STI, SIG BIO, SIG PUB
00
2774002742 2002 ASIST 2002: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 65TH ASIST ANNUAL MEETING, VOL 39, 2002 39():480-481
Vaughan KTL; Blixrud J; Hahn KL; Cohn D
The changing face of scientific communication: Developing new models for scholarly publishing in the electronic environment
00
2775002743 2002 ASM NEWS 68(11):529-530
Covert MW; Palsson BO; Schilling CH
A more-palatable H-pylori: Iterative model-building through the peer-review process
02
27760452744 2002 ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS 30():15-21
Worth AP; Balls M
The principles of validation and the ECVAM validation process
03
27776112745 2002 AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL 80(10):604-605
Revington ML
Peer review - What is it? Why use it?
02
27788272746 2002 BIOSCIENCE 52(9):824-829
Liu JG; Pysarchik DT; Taylor WW
Peer review in the classroom
00
2779112747 2002 BLOOD CELLS MOLECULES AND DISEASES 28(1):91-91
Lichtman MA; Oakes D
The productivity and impact of the leukemia & lymphoma society scholar program: The apparent positive effect of peer review (vol 27, pg 1020, 2001)
00
2780452748 2002 BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2():-
Montgomery AA; Graham A; Evans PH; Fahey T
Inter-rater agreement in the scoring of abstracts submitted to a primary care research conference
02
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
27810142749 2002 BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION 30(11):749-752
Ali MY; Oyama Y; Monreal J; Winter J; Tallman M; Gordon LI; Williams S; Singhal S; Mehta J
Reassessing the definition of myeloid engraftment after autotransplantation: it is not necessary to see 0.5 X 10(9)/l neutrophils on 3 consecutive days to define myeloid recovery
01
2782002750 2002 BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY 53(1):1-2
Lennard MS; Ratter JM; Begg EJ; Tucker GT
The Journal moves online for submission and peer review
00
27830242751 2002 BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE 52(476):181-186
Walker J; Mathers N
The impact of a general practice group intervention on prescribing costs and patterns
04
2784002752 2002 BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY 89():79-79
Thompson AM; McPhillips G; Burton H; Stonebridge PA
Deaths while in surgical care: mapping improvements in practice over 7 years of continuous peer review audit
00
2785112754 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 325(7362):491-491
Zwarenstein M
Peer review of statistics in medical research - Journal reviewers are even more baffled by sample size issues than grant proposal reviewers
02
2786112755 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 325(7362):491-492
Horrobin DF
Peer review of statistics in medical research - Rationale for requiring power calculations is needed
03
2787142756 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 325(7362):492-492
Altman DG; Moher D; Schulz KF
Peer review of statistics in medical research - Reporting power calculations is important
01
2788002757 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 325(7362):492-493
Bacchetti P
Peer review of statistics in medical research - Author's thoughts on power calculations
00
2789112758 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 325(7362):493-493
Barton GA
Peer review of statistics in medical research - Reviewers' contributions should be thoughtful, constructive, and encouraging
00
2790112759 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 325(7362):493-493
Fox M
Peer review of statistics in medical research - Suggested solution may, partly solve other problem
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
27910152760 2002 BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION 80(1):47-55
Walker D; McDermott JM; Fox-Rushby J; Tanjung M; Nadjib M; Widiatmoko D; Achadi E
An economic analysis of midwifery training programmes in South Kalimantan, Indonesia
00
27924292761 2002 CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN 48():1337-1344
Goulet F; Jacques A; Gagnon R; Bourbeau D; Laberge D; Melanson J; Menard C; Racette P; Rivest R
Performance assessment - Family physicians in Montreal meet the mark!
00
2793002762 2002 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 45(1):4-4
Waddell JP
Peer review
01
279411172764 2002 CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH 56(3):339-346
Opthof T; Coronel R; Janse MJ
The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias
00
2795002765 2002 CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS 80(26):14-14
[Anon]
Federal peer review under scrutiny
00
27961122766 2002 CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH 8(4):957-962
Young-McCaughan S; Rich IM; Lindsay GC; Bertram KA
The Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program: Innovations in the federal funding of biomedical research
00
27970302767 2002 CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST 16(1):97-104
Johnson-Greene D; Bechtold KT
Ethical considerations for peer review in forensic neuropsychology
01
2798002769 2002 CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS 24(10):1646-1647
Lyles A
Peer review and evidence-based decisions
00
2799012770 2002 COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES 63(2):205-206
Shiflett L
Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses.
00
28000412771 2002 CONSERVATION ECOLOGY 5(2):-
Marmorek D; Peters C
Finding a PATH toward scientific collaboration: Insights from the Columbia River basin
00

Page 28:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14