Missing Links? Citation Matrix | Graphs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
LOCK S, 1986, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED, ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66 INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686 CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE, BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231 COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC, |
Nodes: 3179
Authors: 5486,
Journals: 1041,
Outer References: 34852
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by LCS.
Page 2: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
101 | 17 | 33 | 2051 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):214-215
Rennie D Peer review in Prague | 6 | 11 |
102 | 1 | 13 | 2060 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):275-277
Jefferson T; Smith R; Yee Y; Drummond M; Pratt M; Gale R Evaluating the BMJ guidelines for economic submissions - Prospective audit of economic submissions to BMJ and The Lancet | 6 | 29 |
103 | 11 | 20 | 2814 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2762-2765
Godlee F Making reviewers visible - Openness, accountability, and credit | 6 | 11 |
104 | 2 | 9 | 58 1974 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 131(12):1358-1362
LANGSLEY DG; LEBARON GI PEER REVIEW GUIDELINES - SURVEY OF LOCAL STANDARDS OF TREATMENT | 5 | 9 |
105 | 0 | 32 | 82 1974 SCIENCE 185(4155):916-921
NOBLE JH PEER REVIEW - QUALITY-CONTROL OF APPLIED SOCIAL-RESEARCH | 5 | 13 |
106 | 1 | 13 | 284 1980 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 70(3):222-228
HASTINGS GE; SONNEBORN R; LEE GH; VICK L; SASMOR L PEER-REVIEW CHECKLIST - REPRODUCIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF A METHOD FOR EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF AMBULATORY CARE | 5 | 12 |
107 | 5 | 7 | 294 1980 CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY-A JOURNAL OF REVIEWS 9(2):204-207
CHUBIN DE PEER-REVIEW IN THE NATIONAL-SCIENCE-FOUNDATION - PHASE ONE OF A STUDY - COLE,S, RUBIN,L, COLE,JR | 5 | 7 |
108 | 0 | 0 | 317 1980 SCIENCE 207(4433):822-823
STUMPF WE PEER-REVIEW | 5 | 8 |
109 | 3 | 5 | 347 1981 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 12(6):776-784
COHEN LH PEER-REVIEW OF PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY OF THE APA-CHAMPUS PROGRAM | 5 | 9 |
110 | 5 | 7 | 363 1982 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 72(3):239-240
YANKAUER A EDITORS REPORT - PEER-REVIEW AGAIN | 5 | 8 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
111 | 7 | 22 | 392 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285(6350):1224-1226
LOCK S PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 5 | 17 |
112 | 3 | 18 | 529 1984 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 15(1):96-108
STRICKER G; COHEN LH APA/CHAMPUS PEER-REVIEW PROJECT - IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH AND PRACTICE | 5 | 5 |
113 | 1 | 1 | 917 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1376-1378
GARFUNKEL JM; LAWSON EE; HAMRICK HJ; ULSHEN MH EFFECT OF ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION ON THE AUTHORS EVALUATION OF PEER-REVIEW OF MEDICAL MANUSCRIPTS | 5 | 9 |
114 | 2 | 12 | 963 1990 SCIENTOMETRICS 19(5-6):419-425
HARTMANN I; NEIDHARDT F PEER-REVIEW AT THE DEUTSCHE-FORSCHUNGSGEMEINSCHAFT | 5 | 8 |
115 | 8 | 22 | 1079 1991 SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES 16(3):322-341
TRAVIS GDL; COLLINS HM NEW LIGHT ON OLD BOYS - COGNITIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL PARTICULARISM IN THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM | 5 | 13 |
116 | 0 | 12 | 1294 1993 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 270(9):1046-1051
NORMAN GR; DAVIS DA; LAMB S; HANNA E; CAULFORD P; KAIGAS T COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT OF PRIMARY-CARE PHYSICIANS AS PART OF A PEER-REVIEW PROGRAM | 5 | 39 |
117 | 3 | 27 | 1514 1995 ANESTHESIOLOGY 82(5):1181-1188
LAGASSE RS; STEINBERG ES; KATZ RI; SAUBERMANN AJ DEFINING QUALITY OF PERIOPERATIVE CARE BY STATISTICAL PROCESS-CONTROL OF ADVERSE OUTCOMES | 5 | 41 |
118 | 5 | 21 | 1708 1996 CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS 17(1):1-12
Jadad AR; Moore RA; Carroll D; Jenkinson C; Reynolds DJM; Gavaghan DJ; McQuay HJ Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? | 5 | 737 |
119 | 1 | 41 | 1751 1996 LANCET 347(9013):1459-1463
Altman LK The ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review .2. | 5 | 28 |
120 | 0 | 23 | 1771 1996 OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 24(5):597-602
Jones MJ; Brinn T; Pendlebury M Judging the quality of research in business schools: A comment from accounting | 5 | 9 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
121 | 3 | 25 | 1798 1996 SCIENTOMETRICS 36(3):397-420
vanRaan AFJ Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises | 5 | 43 |
122 | 1 | 3 | 2110 1998 LEARNED PUBLISHING 11(3):179-184
Donovan B The truth about peer review | 5 | 6 |
123 | 7 | 83 | 2192 1999 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE 25(1):7-60
Scheutzow SO State medical peer review: High cost but no benefit - Is it time for a change? | 5 | 7 |
124 | 2 | 32 | 2227 1999 CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 40(4):508-514
Marusic A; Marusic M Small scientific journals from small countries: Breaking from a vicious circle of inadequacy | 5 | 18 |
125 | 2 | 7 | 2815 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2781-2783
Callahan ML; Knopp RK; Gallagher EJ Effect of written feedback by editors on quality of reviews - Two tandomized trials | 5 | 5 |
126 | 22 | 39 | 2817 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2786-2790
Jefferson T; Wager E; Davidoff F Measuring the quality of editorial peer review | 5 | 9 |
127 | 0 | 1 | 2878 2002 NATURE 416(6878):258-260
Gura T Peer review, unmasked | 5 | 9 |
128 | 0 | 2 | 35 1973 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 224(6):884-885
PETERSON P TEACHING PEER REVIEW | 4 | 15 |
129 | 0 | 4 | 60 1974 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 131(12):1367-1370
MILLER RR; BLACK GC; ERTEL PY; OGRAM GF PSYCHIATRIC PEER REVIEW - OHIO SYSTEM | 4 | 9 |
130 | 1 | 17 | 89 1975 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 82(2):262-267
GOLDSTEIN RL; ROBERTS JS; STANTON BA; MAGLOTT DB; HORAN MJ DATA FOR PEER REVIEW - ACQUISITION AND USE - RESULTS IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICAL-CARE REVIEW ORGANIZATION PROGRAM | 4 | 11 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
131 | 1 | 33 | 112 1975 SCIENCE 190(4219):1060-1096
GUSTAFSON T CONTROVERSY OVER PEER REVIEW | 4 | 22 |
132 | 0 | 0 | 146 1977 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 134(2):121-125
CHODOFF P; SANTORA P PSYCHIATRIC PEER REVIEW - WASHINGTON, DC, EXPERIENCE, 1972-1975 | 4 | 10 |
133 | 0 | 3 | 147 1977 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 134(2):186-188
SULLIVAN FW PEER REVIEW AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS | 4 | 9 |
134 | 0 | 5 | 164 1977 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 36(8):2066-2068
HENLEY C PEER REVIEW OF RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATIONS AT NATIONAL-INSTITUTES-OF-HEALTH .1. ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL PROCESSES | 4 | 12 |
135 | 0 | 1 | 165 1977 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 36(9):2186-2190
HENLEY C PEER REVIEW OF RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATIONS AT NATIONAL-INSTITUTES-OF-HEALTH .2. REVIEW BY AN INITIAL REVIEW GROUP | 4 | 12 |
136 | 0 | 0 | 166 1977 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 36(10):2335-2338
HENLEY C PEER REVIEW OF RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATIONS AT NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH 3 REVIEW BY AN ADVISORY BOARD-COUNCIL | 4 | 11 |
137 | 0 | 2 | 192 1977 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 296(21):1230-1231
ENGEBRETSEN B PEER REVIEW IN GRADUATE-EDUCATION | 4 | 7 |
138 | 2 | 3 | 234 1979 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 136(4):444-447
ALLEN MG PEER-REVIEW OF GROUP-THERAPY - WASHINGTON, DC, 1972-1977 | 4 | 7 |
139 | 4 | 50 | 320 1980 SPECULATIONS IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 3(5):533-562
RUDERFER M THE FALLACY OF PEER-REVIEW - JUDGMENT WITHOUT SCIENCE AND A CASE-HISTORY | 4 | 9 |
140 | 5 | 40 | 377 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):221-225
MANWELL C; BAKER CMA REFORM PEER-REVIEW - THE PETERS AND CECI STUDY IN THE CONTEXT OF OTHER CURRENT STUDIES OF SCIENTIFIC EVALUATION | 4 | 7 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
141 | 0 | 0 | 401 1982 CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS 60(11):32-43
SANDERS HJ PEER-REVIEW - HOW WELL IS IT WORKING | 4 | 4 |
142 | 0 | 10 | 469 1983 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION 58(6):457-461
IRBY DM PEER-REVIEW OF TEACHING IN MEDICINE | 4 | 12 |
143 | 2 | 3 | 476 1983 JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY 10(3):479-481
RUSSELL AS; THORN BD; GRACE M PEER-REVIEW - A SIMPLIFIED APPROACH | 4 | 4 |
144 | 3 | 15 | 502 1984 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 39(4):406-414
THEAMAN M THE IMPACT OF PEER-REVIEW ON PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | 4 | 5 |
145 | 0 | 0 | 578 1985 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 313(18):1156-1157
DOLIN LC ANTITRUST-LAW VERSUS PEER-REVIEW | 4 | 10 |
146 | 1 | 4 | 776 1988 SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 19(2):109-115
BANNER JM PRESERVING THE INTEGRITY OF PEER-REVIEW | 4 | 13 |
147 | 2 | 16 | 914 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1348-1352
HARGENS LL VARIATION IN JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW SYSTEMS - POSSIBLE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES | 4 | 17 |
148 | 1 | 3 | 1002 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):157-157
MARSH HW; BALL S REFLECTIONS ON THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 4 | 4 |
149 | 2 | 10 | 1027 1991 FASEB JOURNAL 5(9):2313-2314
FORSDYKE DR BICAMERAL GRANT REVIEW - AN ALTERNATIVE TO CONVENTIONAL PEER-REVIEW | 4 | 4 |
150 | 1 | 32 | 1038 1991 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 265(10):1265-1270
KELLIE SE; KELLY JT MEDICARE PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATION PREPROCEDURE REVIEW CRITERIA - AN ANALYSIS OF CRITERIA FOR 3 PROCEDURES | 4 | 22 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
151 | 1 | 40 | 1039 1991 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 265(15):1977-1981
SANAZARO PJ; MILLS DH A CRITIQUE OF THE USE OF GENERIC SCREENING IN QUALITY ASSESSMENT | 4 | 50 |
152 | 1 | 9 | 1046 1991 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 44(4-5):343-345
KEMPER KJ PRIDE AND PREJUDICE IN PEER-REVIEW | 4 | 8 |
153 | 1 | 27 | 1047 1991 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 44(11):1271-1278
OXMAN AD; GUYATT GH VALIDATION OF AN INDEX OF THE QUALITY OF REVIEW ARTICLES | 4 | 78 |
154 | 0 | 0 | 1095 1991 TECHNOLOGY REVIEW 94(7):28-&
MCCUTCHEN CW PEER-REVIEW - TREACHEROUS SERVANT, DISASTROUS MASTER | 4 | 8 |
155 | 0 | 1 | 1171 1992 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 7(3):237-239
SHIELDS WD PEER-REVIEW OF EXPERT MEDICAL-LEGAL TESTIMONY - A PROPOSAL FOR CHILD NEUROLOGY | 4 | 11 |
156 | 0 | 34 | 1195 1992 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 327(16):1135-1140
BERO LA; GALBRAITH A; RENNIE D THE PUBLICATION OF SPONSORED SYMPOSIUMS IN MEDICAL JOURNALS | 4 | 91 |
157 | 6 | 27 | 1259 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6893):1672-1675
GILLETT R; HARROW J PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .2. IS MEDICAL-RESEARCH WELL-SERVED BY PEER-REVIEW | 4 | 12 |
158 | 1 | 1 | 1510 1995 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 164(4):1007-1009
FRIEDMAN DP MANUSCRIPT PEER-REVIEW AT THE AJR - FACTS, FIGURES, AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT | 4 | 4 |
159 | 1 | 113 | 1644 1995 SCIENTOMETRICS 34(2):163-206
KOSTOFF RN FEDERAL, RESEARCH IMPACT ASSESSMENT - AXIOMS, APPROACHES, APPLICATIONS | 4 | 11 |
160 | 1 | 5 | 1772 1996 OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 24(5):603-606
Doyle JR; Arthurs AJ; McAulay L; Osborne PG Citation as effortful voting: A reply | 4 | 8 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
161 | 2 | 29 | 1912 1997 JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE 42(5):810-815
Fallon WF; Barnoski AL; Mancuso CL; Tinnell CA; Malangoni MA Benchmarking the quality-monitoring process: A comparison of outcomes analysis by trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) methodology with the peer-review process | 4 | 11 |
162 | 11 | 22 | 1997 1998 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 173():110-113
Howard L; Wilkinson G Peer review and editorial decision-making | 4 | 7 |
163 | 3 | 6 | 2052 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):227-228
Purcell GP; Donovan SL; Davidoff F Changes to manuscripts during the editorial process - Characterizing the evolution of a clinical paper | 4 | 13 |
164 | 29 | 181 | 2147 1998 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 19(3):181-211
Campanario JM Peer review for journals as it stands today - Part 1 | 4 | 10 |
165 | 23 | 150 | 2148 1998 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 19(4):277-306
Campanario JM Peer review for journals as it stands today - Part 2 | 4 | 8 |
166 | 6 | 32 | 2248 1999 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 282(4):349-355
Baldwin LM; Hart LG; Oshel RE; Fordyce MA; Cohen R; Rosenblatt RA Hospital peer review and the National Practitioner Data Bank - Clinical privileges action reports | 4 | 9 |
167 | 1 | 15 | 2249 1999 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 282(4):381-382
Brennan TA Hospital peer review and clinical privileges actions - To report or not report | 4 | 13 |
168 | 4 | 13 | 2412 2000 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 12(3):169-175
Shaw CD External quality mechanisms for health care: summary of the ExPeRT project on visitatie, accreditation, EFQM and ISO assessment in European Union countries | 4 | 19 |
169 | 0 | 10 | 2416 2000 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 12(3):239-242
Van Weert C Developments in professional quality assurance towards quality improvement: some examples of peer review in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom | 4 | 6 |
170 | 2 | 33 | 2638 2001 MEDICAL EDUCATION 35():2-8
Southgate L; Cox Y; David T; Hatch D; Howes A; Johnson N; Jolly B; Macdonald E; McAvoy P; McCrorie P; Turner Y The assessment of poorly performing doctors: the development of the assessment programmes for the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures | 4 | 13 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
171 | 5 | 10 | 2818 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2790-2793
Weber EJ; Katz PP; Waeckerle JF; Callahan ML Author perception of peer review - Impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction | 4 | 7 |
172 | 0 | 3 | 14 1971 NEW YORK STATE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 71(16):1963-&
FINE J; MOREHEAD MA STUDY OF PEER REVIEW OF INHOSPITAL PATIENT CARE - WITH AID OF MANUAL | 3 | 18 |
173 | 0 | 0 | 22 1972 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 219(8):1060-&
SCHLESS JM PEER REVIEW AS AN EDUCATIONAL CHALLENGE | 3 | 7 |
174 | 0 | 1 | 26 1973 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 130(3):301-304
LANGSLEY DG PEER REVIEW - PROSPECTS AND PROBLEMS | 3 | 9 |
175 | 0 | 0 | 99 1975 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 293(26):1371-1372
INGELFINGER FJ CHARITY AND PEER REVIEW IN PUBLICATION | 3 | 15 |
176 | 0 | 0 | 105 1975 SCIENCE 188(4192):999-1001
WALSH J NSF AND ITS CRITICS IN CONGRESS - NEW PRESSURE ON PEER REVIEW | 3 | 5 |
177 | 0 | 0 | 107 1975 SCIENCE 189(4200):331-331
CAREY WD PEER REVIEW REVISITED | 3 | 4 |
178 | 1 | 3 | 163 1977 CLINICAL RESEARCH 25(5):306-311
WIENER SL; URIVETZKY M; BREGMAN D; COHEN J; EICH R; GOOTMAN N; GULOTTA S; TAYLOR B; TUTTLE R; WEBB W; WRIGHT J PEER REVIEW - INTER-REVIEWER AGREEMENT DURING EVALUATION OF RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATIONS | 3 | 3 |
179 | 0 | 4 | 200 1978 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING 78(12):2094-2096
VENGROSKI SM; SAARMANN L PEER REVIEW IN QUALITY ASSURANCE | 3 | 4 |
180 | 0 | 4 | 283 1980 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 137(2):244-245
KASS F; CHARLES E; BUCKLEY P 2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF A PEER-REVIEW TRAINING-PROGRAM FOR RESIDENTS | 3 | 5 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
181 | 0 | 6 | 371 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):205-205
CICCHETTI DV ON PEER-REVIEW - WE HAVE MET THE ENEMY AND HE IS US | 3 | 8 |
182 | 0 | 10 | 379 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):229-230
OVER R WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF BIAS IN PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 6 |
183 | 0 | 0 | 383 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):235-236
ROSENTHAL R RELIABILITY AND BIAS IN PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES | 3 | 3 |
184 | 0 | 0 | 385 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):237-238
SCARR S ANOSMIC PEER-REVIEW - A ROSE BY ANOTHER NAME IS EVIDENTLY NOT A ROSE | 3 | 10 |
185 | 0 | 22 | 404 1982 HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 17(2):113-123
LUKE RD; MODROW RE PROFESSIONALISM, ACCOUNTABILITY AND PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 6 |
186 | 1 | 6 | 422 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13(1):14-18
SECHREST L; HOFFMAN PE THE PHILOSOPHICAL UNDERPINNINGS OF PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 10 |
187 | 0 | 0 | 433 1982 SCIENCE 215(4528):11-11
CLARK AH LUCK, MERIT, AND PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 5 |
188 | 0 | 0 | 524 1984 NATURE 312(5994):497-497
MADDOX J PRIVACY AND THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM | 3 | 8 |
189 | 0 | 0 | 581 1985 SCIENCE 228(4706):1387-1387
KOSHLAND DE PEER-REVIEW OF PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 8 |
190 | 0 | 1 | 605 1986 BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY 21(1):1-2
YALOW RS PEER-REVIEW AND SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS | 3 | 4 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
191 | 0 | 4 | 627 1986 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY 4(11):1658-1661
PRESANT CA; RUSSELL WO; ALEXANDER RW; FU YS SOFT-TISSUE AND BONE SARCOMA HISTOPATHOLOGY PEER-REVIEW - THE FREQUENCY OF DISAGREEMENT IN DIAGNOSIS AND THE NEED FOR 2ND PATHOLOGY OPINIONS THE SOUTHEASTERN-CANCER-STUDY-GROUP EXPERIENCE | 3 | 63 |
192 | 1 | 1 | 638 1986 NATURE 322(6074):24-25
HARNAD S A DIFFICULT BALANCE - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICINE - LOCK,S | 3 | 5 |
193 | 1 | 4 | 693 1987 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 316(10):597-598
CURRAN WJ MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW OF PHYSICIAN COMPETENCE AND PERFORMANCE - LEGAL IMMUNITY AND THE ANTITRUST-LAWS | 3 | 10 |
194 | 2 | 13 | 719 1987 SCIENTOMETRICS 11(5-6):333-350
NEDERHOF AJ; VANRAAN AFJ PEER-REVIEW AND BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS OF SCIENTIFIC PERFORMANCE - A COMPARISON OF CUM LAUDE DOCTORATES WITH ORDINARY DOCTORATES IN PHYSICS | 3 | 12 |
195 | 3 | 29 | 740 1988 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 33(7):645-649
ELGUEBALY N PEER-REVIEW - EMPIRICAL-DATA BASE AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS | 3 | 5 |
196 | 2 | 19 | 765 1988 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS 38(306):10-13
GROL R; MOKKINK H; SCHELLEVIS F THE EFFECTS OF PEER-REVIEW IN GENERAL-PRACTICE | 3 | 24 |
197 | 0 | 27 | 795 1988 VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW 74(6):1115-1140
MORTER CS THE HEALTH-CARE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1986 - WILL PHYSICIANS FIND PEER-REVIEW MORE INVITING | 3 | 6 |
198 | 0 | 0 | 818 1989 CURRENT SCIENCE 58(20):1114-1116
PRATHAP G A MODEST PROPOSAL FOR GLASNOST IN THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 3 | 3 |
199 | 0 | 0 | 819 1989 FASEB JOURNAL 3(8):1987-1992
GREEN JG; CALHOUN F; NIERZWICKI L; BRACKETT J; MEIER P RATING INTERVALS - AN EXPERIMENT IN PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 8 |
200 | 1 | 5 | 832 1989 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 261(5):749-749
RENNIE D; KNOLL E; FLANAGIN A THE INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION | 3 | 4 |
Page 2: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
Generated by:
HistCite(Vlad).
Version: 2004.05.14