Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Fri Jul 9 10:34:34 2004
Topic Search: "Peer Review" plus the following:
LOCK S, 1986, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED,
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE,
BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231
COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC,

Nodes: 3179
Authors: 5486, Journals: 1041, Outer References: 34852
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by first author.
Page 30:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
29010152760 2002 BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION 80(1):47-55
Walker D; McDermott JM; Fox-Rushby J; Tanjung M; Nadjib M; Widiatmoko D; Achadi E
An economic analysis of midwifery training programmes in South Kalimantan, Indonesia
00
2902041268 1993 CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (294):4-6
WALKER DG
THE CLASSIC - BONE-RESORPTION RESTORED IN OSTEOPETROTIC MICE BY TRANSPLANTS OF NORMAL BONE-MARROW AND SPLEEN-CELLS (REPRINTED FROM SCIENCE, VOL 190, PG 784, 1975)
02
29030242751 2002 BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE 52(476):181-186
Walker J; Mathers N
The impact of a general practice group intervention on prescribing costs and patterns
04
2904022858 2002 LANCET 359(9325):2282-2282
Wallace H
The need for independent scientific peer review of Biobank UK
01
2905039988 1991 AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY 10(1):53-68
WALLACE WA
PEER-REVIEW FILINGS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS IN EVALUATING SELF-REGULATION
00
2906111623 1986 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT 33(4):218-222
WALLMARK JT; SEDIG KG
QUALITY OF RESEARCH MEASURED BY CITATION METHOD AND BY PEER-REVIEW - A COMPARISON
07
2907582370 2000 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 176():47-51
Walsh E; Rooney M; Appleby L; Wilkinson G
Open peer review: a randomised controlled trial
711
290800105 1975 SCIENCE 188(4192):999-1001
WALSH J
NSF AND ITS CRITICS IN CONGRESS - NEW PRESSURE ON PEER REVIEW
35
290901106 1975 SCIENCE 189(4197):123-123
WALSH J
NSF TO MAKE MORE PEER REVIEW INFORMATION AVAILABLE
00
291002108 1975 SCIENCE 189(4201):435-437
WALSH J
NSF PEER REVIEW HEARINGS - HOUSE PANEL STARTS WITH CRITICS
07
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
291103110 1975 SCIENCE 190(4211):253-256
WALSH J
PEER REVIEW - NSF FACES CHANGES, QUESTION IS HOW EXTENSIVE
24
291201708 1987 SCIENCE 235(4785):153-153
WALSH J
PEER-REVIEW - OOPS - MERIT REVIEW IN FOR SOME CHANGES AT NSF
11
291300713 1987 SCIENCE 238(4833):1506-1506
WALSH J
GEOGRAPHICAL LIMIT ON RESEARCH FUNDS IN BILL SEEN AS SWIPE AT PEER-REVIEW
00
2914002235 1999 GASTROENTEROLOGY 117(2):293-294
Walsh JH
E-biomed: Improving access or a threat to peer review?
00
2915011834 1997 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 182(9):330-330
Walters H
Peer review: Stifles innovation?
00
2916001654 1995 TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY 23(2):226-234
WARD JM; HARDISTY JF; HAILEY JR; STREETT CS
PEER-REVIEW IN TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
19
29170171279 1993 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY 48(1):9-14
WAREHAM V; BAIN C; CRUICKSHANK D
CESAREAN-SECTION AUDIT BY PEER-REVIEW
03
2918001443 1994 JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE AND CORNEAL SURGERY 10(2):S169-S169
WARING GO
SCIENTIFIC JOURNALISM - PROCEEDINGS VERSUS PEER-REVIEW
00
2919001745 1996 JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY 12(2):221-221
Waring GO
Proceedings vs peer review
00
2920001899 1997 JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY 13(5):S424-S424
Waring GO; Waring SG
Proceedings vs. peer review
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
29210142730 2002 ANESTHESIOLOGY 97(1):1-3
Warltier DC; Kersten JR; Pagel PS; Gross GJ
Anesthetic preconditioning: Serendipity and science
09
29220232440 2000 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE 26(6):453-459
Warner J
A critical review of the application of citation studies to the Research Assessment Exercises
17
29233473030 2003 JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES 43(2):362-373
Warr WA
Evaluation of an experimental chemistry preprint server
11
2924112424 2000 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 283(7):886-886
Warren E
The National Practitioner Data Bank and the quality of peer review
00
2925111480 1994 SCIENCE 266(5187):954-954
WARREN KS
PEER-REVIEW STUDY
00
29261561862 1997 ENDOCRINOLOGIST 7(5):322-333
Wartofsky L
Bioequivalence of levothyroxine preparations: Shortcomings and implications of a recently published study
07
29272751931 1997 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 72(2):430-469
Washington MJ
The practice of peer review in the international nuclear safety regime
00
29281393039 2003 JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE 52(12):956-964
Watson LC; Pignone MP
Screening accuracy for late-life depression in primary care: A systematic review
01
29290821431 1994 JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH 48(1):16-21
WATT IS; FRANKS AJ; SHELDON TA
HEALTH AND HEALTH-CARE OF RURAL POPULATIONS IN THE UK - IS IT BETTER OR WORSE
026
293011949 1990 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 322(9):638-638
WAYE JD
EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
293111707 1987 SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 18(4):277-279
WEBB RK
A DIFFICULT BALANCE - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICINE - LOCK,S
00
29323172058 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):257-259
Weber EJ; Callaham ML; Wears RL; Barton C; Young G
Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting - Why investigators fail to publish
735
29335102818 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2790-2793
Weber EJ; Katz PP; Waeckerle JF; Callahan ML
Author perception of peer review - Impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction
47
2934001291 1993 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE 3(1):1-2
WEBER MG
PEER-REVIEW
011
2935002626 2001 JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 122(3):419-420
Wechsler AS
Peer review: Recognition and responsibility
11
2936113061 2003 JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 126(6):1681-1682
Wechsler AS; Fried PW
Peer review
00
29370143177 2004 THORAX 59(3):183-183
Wedzicha JA
Peer review and NICE COPD guidelines
00
2938015178 1977 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION 70(2):157-160
WEED JE; MOLLESON AL
ESTABLISHING GUIDELINES FOR PEER REVIEW OF CLINICAL DIETITIAN
05
293908929 1990 JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION 61(2):198-219
WEEKS KM
THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - CONFIDENTIALITY AND DISCLOSURE
13
29402221552 1995 HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 30(3):489-506
WEI FF; MARK D; HARTZ A; CAMPBELL C
ARE PRO DISCHARGE SCREENS ASSOCIATED WITH POSTDISCHARGE ADVERSE OUTCOMES
16
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
294101417 1982 PHYSICS TODAY 35(3):13-13
WEINBERG AM
PEER-REVIEW REVISITED
00
294207285 1980 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 139(3):348-351
WEINER JP; GIBSON G; MUNSTER AM
USE OF PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTICS IN SURGICAL-PROCEDURES - PEER-REVIEW GUIDELINES AS A METHOD FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE
07
29438212804 2002 HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 37(2):483-498
Weingart SN; Davis RB; Palmer RH; Cahalane M; Hamel MB; Mukamal K; Phillips RS; Davies DT; Iezzoni LI
Discrepancies between explicit and implicit review: Physician and nurse assessments of complications and quality
03
29446392465 2000 MEDICAL CARE 38(8):796-806
Weingart SN; Iezzoni LI; Davis RB; Palmer RH; Cahalane M; Hamel MB; Mukamal K; Phillips RS; Daves DT; Banks NJ
Use of administrative data to find substandard care - Validation of the complications screening program
235
29457182586 2001 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 13(5):357-365
Weingart SN; Mukamal K; Davis RB; Davies DT; Palmer RH; Cahalane M; Hamel MB; Phillips RS; Iezzoni LI
Physician-reviewers' perceptions and judgments about quality of care
00
2946112029 1998 EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 21(4):413-418
Weinmann C
Quality improvement in health care - A brief history of the Medicare Peer Review Organization (PRO) initiative
22
2947172507 2000 SPINE 25(18):2277-2279
Weinstein JN
Peer review: Quality improvement at its best
01
29483242297 1999 NEUROLOGIC CLINICS 17(2):363-+
Weintraub MI
Expert witness testimony - An update
05
29490171293 1993 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 270(4):459-464
WEISS RB; VOGELZANG NJ; PETERSON BA; PANASCI LC; CARPENTER JT; GAVIGAN M; SARTELL K; FREI E; MCINTYRE OR
A SUCCESSFUL SYSTEM OF SCIENTIFIC-DATA AUDITS FOR CLINICAL-TRIALS
036
29500049 1973 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 289(19):1046-1046
WELCH CE
PEER REVIEW OR FEDERAL PEERING - REPLY
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2951012861 2002 LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH 24(3):305-305
Weller A
Editorial peer review, its strengths and weaknesses (vol 23, pg 37, 2001)
00
295211690 1987 LIBRARY QUARTERLY 57(3):330-331
WELLER AC
A DIFFICULT BALANCE - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICINE - LOCK,S
00
2953321896 1990 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 78(3):258-265
WELLER AC
EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - METHODOLOGY AND DATA-COLLECTION
01
295418913 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1344-1347
WELLER AC
EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN UNITED-STATES MEDICAL JOURNALS
1432
29554121088 1991 SERIALS LIBRARIAN 19(3-4):95-103
WELLER AC
POTENTIAL BIAS IN EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - A STUDY OF UNITED-STATES MEDICAL JOURNALS
14
29563141694 1996 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 84(3):359-366
Weller AC
Editorial peer review: A comparison of authors publishing in two groups of US medical journals
04
29575362453 2000 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE 51(14):1328-1333
Weller AC
Editorial peer review for electronic journals: Current issues and emerging models
25
2958022686 2001 SCIENTIST 15(21):39-39
Weller AC
Peer review: Do studies prove its effectiveness?
10
2959052823 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2865-2866
Weller AC
Qualitative and quantitative measures of indexed health sciences electronic journals
01
2960041625 1995 POPULATION RESEARCH AND POLICY REVIEW 14(3):277-282
WELLER B
BIOSOCIAL MODELS OF DEMOGRAPHIC BEHAVIOR - AN INTRODUCTION
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
29611122791 2002 FAMILY MEDICINE 34(10):738-743
Wendling A; Hoekstra L
Interactive peer review: An innovative resident evaluation tool
00
29622141924 1997 NATURE 387(6631):341-343
Wenneras C; Wold A
Nepotism and sexism in peer-review
1897
296300574 1985 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 313(7):455-455
WENTWORTH P
JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW
00
2964021462 1983 IOWA LAW REVIEW 68(3):585-600
WENTZ JA
BALANCING ACADEMIC-FREEDOM AND CIVIL-RIGHTS - TOWARD AN APPROPRIATE PRIVILEGE FOR THE VOTES OF ACADEMIC PEER-REVIEW COMMITTEES
00
29650017 1972 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND ARCHIVES OF AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OPTOMETRY 49(10):884-&
WERNER DL
PEER REVIEW IN AN INSTITUTIONAL SETTING EXPERIENCE AT OPTOMETRIC CENTER OF NEW YORK
00
29660162783 2002 DISEASE MANAGEMENT & HEALTH OUTCOMES 10(12):743-748
Wertheimer AI; Chaney NM
Clinical guidelines in disease management
00
296716371777 1996 PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE 26(5):883-886
Wessely S
What do we know about peer review?
36
296816462103 1998 LANCET 352(9124):301-305
Wessely S
Peer review of grant applications: what do we know?
1016
296906481 1983 NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL 96(728):216-217
WEST SR
PEER-REVIEW - CENTRAL-EDUCATION-COMMITTEE STATEMENT
12
29700611778 1996 RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 68(1-2):143-150
Western R
Environmental challenges and opportunities: The new era of radioactive waste management
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
297100104 1975 SCIENCE 188(4185):204-&
WESTHEAD EW
PEER REVIEW - DISTRIBUTION OF REVIEWERS
02
297200435 1982 SCIENCE 215(4531):344-&
WESTLEY J
NSF PEER-REVIEW
00
29731193070 2003 LEARNED PUBLISHING 16(4):249-258
Wets K; Weedon D; Velterop J
Post-publication filtering and evaluation: Faculty of 1000
00
297400756 1988 JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE 3(1):59-63
WHALEN JP; SCHMITT BP; ROSSETTI AM
EARLY EXPERIENCE WITH PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS
00
2975072073 1998 JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY IN HIGHER EDUCATION 22(3):413-417
Whalley WB; Rea BR
Two examples of the use of 'electronic posters'
01
2976032208 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7191):1144-1145
Whatling P
Having non-medical readers of papers on Internet will enhance peer review
06
29771141676 1996 ANNALS OF SURGERY 224(2):145-154
Wherry DC; Marohn MR; Malanoski MP; Hetz SP; Rich NM
An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the steady state performed in medical treatment facilities of the department of defense
067
29780181366 1994 ANNALS OF SURGERY 220(5):626-634
WHERRY DC; ROB CG; MAROHN MR; RICH NM
AN EXTERNAL AUDIT OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY PERFORMED IN MEDICAL-TREATMENT FACILITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE
145
2979002972 2003 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 326(7383):241-241
White C
Little evidence for effectiveness of scientific peer review
13
298000979 1991 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC MEDICINE AND PATHOLOGY 12(3):272-273
WHITE L
PEER-REVIEW FOR MEDICAL EXAMINERS
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2981001227 1993 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL 21(6):279-282
WHITE MC
THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS OF THE JOURNAL
11
2982022636 2001 LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH 23(4):371-372
White MD
Editorial peer review, its strengths and weaknesses
00
29830292530 2001 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY 154(11):993-999
White ME; McDonnell SM; Werker DH; Cardenas VM; Thacker SB
Partnerships in International Applied Epidemiology Training and Service, 1975-2001
04
298403386 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):241-241
WHITE MJ
SOME PROCEDURAL OBSCURITIES IN PETERS AND CECIS PEER-REVIEW STUDY
00
2985001574 1995 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LIGAND ASSAY 18(1):54-57
WHITLEY RJ
OCCULT ECTOPIC ACTH SYNDROME
00
29860182454 2000 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION 36(3):493-499
Whittemore RC; Beebe J
EPA's basins model: Good science or serendipitous modeling?
04
2987001727 1996 INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY 109(1):1-2
Wick G
The peer review system - Still no alternative in sight
00
2988001128 1992 BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES 40(1):57-68
WICKS S
PEER-REVIEW AND QUALITY-CONTROL IN HIGHER-EDUCATION
00
29890422705 2001 WRITTEN COMMUNICATION 18(2):107-179
Wiemelt J
Toward an activity-based conception of writing and school writing contexts
00
299013163 1977 CLINICAL RESEARCH 25(5):306-311
WIENER SL; URIVETZKY M; BREGMAN D; COHEN J; EICH R; GOOTMAN N; GULOTTA S; TAYLOR B; TUTTLE R; WEBB W; WRIGHT J
PEER REVIEW - INTER-REVIEWER AGREEMENT DURING EVALUATION OF RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATIONS
33
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2991042607 2001 JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES 46(6):1303-1308
Wiggins KG
Forensic textile fiber examination across the USA and Europe
02
2992002186 1999 ALTEX-ALTERNATIVEN ZU TIEREXPERIMENTEN 16(3):163-166
Wilcox NL
Validation and regulatory acceptance of alternative test methods and international co-operation
00
2993002623 2001 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY 37(2):197A-197A
Wiles JD; Samra JS; Gill R; Deedwania PC
Can the external peer review process provide adequate feedback to sustain the implementation of the heart failure guidelines by primary care providers?
00
2994041105 1992 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ENOLOGY AND VITICULTURE 43(4):381-383
WILKER KL
HYDROLYSIS OF SUCROSE IN EASTERN UNITED-STATES TABLE WINES
00
29956341893 1997 JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2(1):3-15
Wilkes MS
The public dissemination of medical research: Problems and solutions
015
29961201116 1992 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 116(11):912-919
WILKES MS; DOBLIN BH; SHAPIRO MF
PHARMACEUTICAL ADVERTISEMENTS IN LEADING MEDICAL JOURNALS - EXPERTS ASSESSMENTS
3116
2997001580 1995 JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE 10(8):443-450
WILKES MS; KRAVITZ RL
POLICIES, PRACTICES, AND ATTITUDES OF NORTH-AMERICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL EDITORS
823
299834148 1977 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 134(6):637-641
WILKINSON CB; REUS VI
EXAMINATION OF FEDERAL PSYCHIATRIC-TRAINING GRANT PEER REVIEW PROCESS
12
299900423 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13(1):23-26
WILLENS J; DELEON PH
POLITICAL ASPECTS OF PEER-REVIEW
13
300012753 1988 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 260(12):1761-1761
WILLIAMS E
THE PROCESS OF PEER-REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPTS
12

Page 30:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14