Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Fri Jul 9 10:34:28 2004
Topic Search: "Peer Review" plus the following:
LOCK S, 1986, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED,
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE,
BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231
COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC,

Nodes: 3179
Authors: 5486, Journals: 1041, Outer References: 34852
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by first author.
Page 3:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
201031894 1997 JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING 13(5):76-80
Bergeron HE
History and findings of ACEC peer review program
01
202001400 1994 HOSPITALS & HEALTH NETWORKS 68(13):60-60
BERGMAN R
REPORT CARDS ALONE WONT MAKE THE GRADE, SAYS PEER-REVIEW GROUP
00
2031252581 2001 INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL 11(4):305-320
Bergquist M; Ljungberg J
The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities
03
2041702612 2001 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 16(2):99-112
Bergquist M; Ljungberg J; Lundh-Snis U
Practising peer review in organizations: a qualifier for knowledge dissemination and legitimization
00
2050282942 2003 ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA 82(9):780-788
Bergsjo P; Bakketeig LS; Langhoff-Roos J
The development of perinatal audit: 20 years' experience
00
2067151730 1996 ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 32(7):573-575
Beritic T
Medical reviews and the importance of being a ''peer'' in science
00
207001508 1995 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 164(1):235-235
BERK RN; FRIEDMAN DP
NEW CATEGORY OF PEER-REVIEW DECISION - REJECTION WITH OPPORTUNITY TO REVISE AND RESUBMIT
01
208001697 1996 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 155(3):318-320
Berkowitz P
After slow start, protect to channel drug company funds to universities builds steam
01
209012953 2003 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 181(3):649-653
Berlin L
Performance improvement and peer-review - Activities: Are they immune from legal discovery?
00
21000179 1977 MARYLAND STATE MEDICAL JOURNAL 26(9):24-25
BERMAN JI
MED-CHI COMMITTEES .1. PEER REVIEW COMMITTEE
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
21100355 1981 SCIENCE 212(4501):1337-1338
BERNS MW
ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW
00
212092404 2000 IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE 20(3):8-11
Bernstein DS
Peer review
00
21300216 1978 HOSPITALS 52(23):103-105
BERNSTEIN MJ
OUTGOING PSRO HEAD SEES SOLID FUTURE FOR PEER REVIEW
00
2140341195 1992 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 327(16):1135-1140
BERO LA; GALBRAITH A; RENNIE D
THE PUBLICATION OF SPONSORED SYMPOSIUMS IN MEDICAL JOURNALS
491
215111655 1995 URBAN GEOGRAPHY 16(8):655-656
Berry BJL
Peer review: Is it working?
11
2160302099 1998 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION 5(4):382-389
Berry E; Parker-Jones C; Jones RG; Harkin PJR; Horsfall HO; Nicholls JA; Cook NJA
Systematic assessment of World Wide Web materials for medical education: Online, cooperative peer review
111
2170612921 2002 SLEEP 25(2):148-173
Berry RB; Parish JM; Hartse KM
The use of auto-titrating continuous positive airway pressure for treatment of adult obstructive sleep apnea
017
2181171663 1996 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ENOLOGY AND VITICULTURE 47(3):343-345
Bertolini L; Zambonelli C; Giudici P; Castellari L
Higher alcohol production by cryotolerant Saccharomyces strains
013
21900727 1988 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 195():1-CINF
BERTSCH CR
PEER-REVIEW IN AMERICAN-CHEMICAL-SOCIETY JOURNALS
00
22001567 1985 MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA 143(6):247-248
BEST J
PEER-REVIEW - A WHIFF OF GRAPESHOT
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
221081094 1991 SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 35(5):386-388
BETTMAN JW
ANTITRUST AND PEER-REVIEW
00
2221243004 2003 FAMILY PRACTICE 20(4):443-451
Beyer M; Gerlach FM; Flies U; Grol R; Krol Z; Munck A; Olesen F; O'Riordan M; Seuntjens L; Szecsenyi J
The development of quality circles/peer review groups as a method of quality improvement in Europe. Results of a survey in 26 European countries
01
2230025 1973 AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN 7(4):29-29
BHASIN R
PEER REVIEW PROGRESS
00
224091976 1998 ACTA CYTOLOGICA 42(4):865-868
Bhatia A; Singh N; Arora VK; Gupta K
Prospective peer review in fine needle aspiration cytology - Another step toward quality assurance
01
2253142398 2000 HEALTH CARE FINANCING REVIEW 22(1):69-74
Bhatia AJ; Blackstock S; Nelson R; Ng TS
Evolution of quality review programs for Medicare: Quality assurance to quality improvement
00
226092283 1999 LARYNGOSCOPE 109(4):640-644
Bhattacharyya N
Peer review: Studying the major otolaryngology journals
04
2271211384 1994 DISPUTE RESOLUTION JOURNAL 49(1):61-66
BIALIK D; DILTS DA; SAMAVATI H
HIGHER-EDUCATION - FERTILE GROUND FOR ADR
00
2280131770 1996 OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 87(5):664-667
Bickell NA; Zdeb MS; Applegate MS; Roohan PJ; Siu AL
Effect of external peer review on cesarean delivery rates: A statewide program
05
22900820 1989 GEOLOGY 17(12):1067-1067
BICKFORD ME
PEER-REVIEW - COMMENT
00
230030810 1989 BUFFALO LAW REVIEW 37(3):831-861
BIEBUYCK VS
ANTITRUST-LAW, IMMUNITY, AND MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW BOARDS
01
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2311591942 1990 LIBRARY TRENDS 39(1-2):145-167
BIGGS M
THE IMPACT OF PEER-REVIEW ON INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM
27
2325363073 2003 MEDICAL DECISION MAKING 23(1):31-37
Bindels R; Hasman A; van Wersch JWJ; Pop PR; Winkens RAG
The reliability of assessing the appropriateness of requested diagnostic tests
01
233082102 1998 LANCET 351():10-14
Bingham C
Peer review on the Internet: a better class of conversation
13
234141756 1996 MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA 164(1):8-9
Bingham C; Coleman R
Enter the Web: An experiment in electronic research peer review
24
235342116 1998 MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA 169(5):240-241
Bingham C; Van Der Weyden MB
Peer review on the Internet: launching eMJA peer review study 2
02
2364112104 1998 LANCET 352(9126):441-445
Bingham CM; Higgins G; Coleman R; Van Der Weyden MB
The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study
718
237002877 2002 MUSEUM NEWS 81(6):69-69
Binns J
Peer review: Good for you, too (The work of peer reviewers is critical to the museum community)
00
2380842700 2001 TOXICOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL HEALTH 17(5-10):163-175
Birak P; Yurk J; Adeshina F; Lorber M; Pollard K; Choudhury H; Kroner S
Travis and Arms revisited: a second look at a widely used bioconcentration algorithm
01
239001512 1995 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 169(1):187-187
BIRBIGLIA VP
MEDICAL AND SURGICAL PEER-REVIEW
00
240030722 1987 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW 61(1):183-214
BIRICIK SN
RECONCILING SECTION 1157, ELAM, AND WEST-COVINA-HOSPITAL - IS THE SANCTITY OF THE HOSPITAL PEER-REVIEW COMMITTEE SALVAGEABLE
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
24100352 1981 SCIENCE 212(4501):1337-1337
BIRNBAUM HK
ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW
00
24201012002 1998 BULLETIN DU CANCER 85(8):695-711
Biron P; Fuhrmann C; Escande MC; Blanc-Vincent MP; Crokaert F; Beal J; Bussy V; Lesimple T; Pottecher B; Raveneau J; Senet JM; Viot M
Standards, options and recommendations (SOR) for the management of neutropenic cancer patients (excluding prolonged neutropenia)
03
2430101970 1998 ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 5(12):1137-1138
Biros MH
The power of words
01
24400799 1988 WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN 16(4):458-462
BISSONETTE JA
PEER-REVIEW - SOME SUGGESTIONS FROM OTHER DISCIPLINES
01
245001701 1996 CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS 74(16):2-2
Bizzigotti GO
More on peer review
00
246001096 1991 TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY 19(3):290-292
BLACK HE
PEER-REVIEW IN TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY - SOME RECOMMENDATIONS
03
247001895 1997 JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS 16(1):R1-R2
Black JT
Peer review - The editor's dilemma
00
248002442 2000 JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS 19(3):147-148
Black JT
Peer review process revisited
00
249272053 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):231-233
Black N; van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Smith R; Evans S
What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal?
2640
25001100 1975 NEW YORK STATE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 75(5):746-748
BLANCATO LS
PEER REVIEW AND ANESTHESIOLOGIST
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
251052524 2001 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 76(9):954-955
Bland C; Caelleigh A; Steinecke A
Reviewer's etiquette
11
25215540 1985 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING 85(11):1284-&
BLANTON NE; BOGNER MJ; COLLINS HL; FUTRELL JA; LAGINA S; ROLISON A
PUTTING PEER-REVIEW INTO PRACTICE
01
25312369 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):203-204
BLISSETT M
PEER-REVIEW AND THE STRUCTURE OF KNOWLEDGE
00
2540272543 2001 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 35(5):563-568
Bloch S; Walter G
The Impact Factor: Time for change
07
25500459 1983 HOSPITALS 57(18):31-31
BLOOM MZ
PRO RULES CHANGE FOCUS OF PEER-REVIEW
00
25600732 1988 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 195():6-CINF
BLOUNT HN
PEER-REVIEW OF NATIONAL-SCIENCE-FOUNDATION GRANT PROPOSALS
00
25700132 1976 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 294(1):29-30
BLUM JD
LAW-MEDICINE NOTES - DUE PROCESS IN HOSPITAL PEER REVIEW
01
25809757 1988 JOURNAL OF LEGAL EDUCATION 38(4):525-533
BLUM JD
MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW
22
2590222163 1998 TRANSFUSION 38(9):891-895
Blum LN; Allen JR; Genel M; Howe JP; Council Sci Affairs Amer Med Assoc
Crossover use of donated blood for autologous transfusion: Report of the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association
06
260111077 1991 SCIENCE 251(4990):211-213
BLUME SS
PEERLESS SCIENCE - PEER-REVIEW AND UNITED-STATES SCIENCE POLICY - CHUBIN,DE, HACKETT,EJ
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2610110769 1988 LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS 51(2):8-92
BLUMSTEIN JF; SLOAN FA
ANTITRUST AND HOSPITAL PEER-REVIEW
03
262002777 2002 CORTEX 38(3):419-420
Bock O
The peer-review process: Accept, revise, or reject?
00
26300390 1982 BIOSCIENCE 32(1):10-12
BODDE T
EVALUATION OF PEER-REVIEW DRAWS MIXED REACTIONS
11
264011063 1991 NEW SCIENTIST 129(1755):3-3
BODEN M
PEER-REVIEW
00
26500223 1978 JOURNAL OF THE SOUTH CAROLINA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 74(4):185-189
BODIE UH; WILLIAMS B; DRENNEN J
MEDICAL INSURANCE PEER REVIEW - PROGRESS AND PROBLEMS IN SOUTH-CAROLINA
00
266022473 2000 NATURE 407(6801):129-130
Bodner S; Paine C
When peer review fails - Problems with a giant laser project.
00
2670024 1972 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATION NS12(4):171-&
BOISSERE.VR
CASE STUDY IN PEER REVIEW
00
2681122336 2000 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 75(5):409-418
Bonazza J; Farrell PM; Albanese M; Kindig D
Collaboration and peer review in medical schools' strategic planning
02
26907162 1977 CLINICAL RESEARCH 25(5):297-305
BONDURANT S
PEER REVIEW OF RESEARCH-PROJECT GRANTS BY NIH STUDY SECTIONS - REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL MEDICAL POLICY, AMERICAN-SOCIETY-FOR-CLINICAL-INVESTIGATION
24
2700921144 1992 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 20(6):884-890
BONE RC
PHOSPHOLIPIDS AND THEIR INHIBITORS - A CRITICAL-EVALUATION OF THEIR ROLE IN THE TREATMENT OF SEPSIS
144
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
27111041145 1992 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 20(6):891-898
BONE RC
INHIBITORS OF COMPLEMENT AND NEUTROPHILS - A CRITICAL-EVALUATION OF THEIR ROLE IN THE TREATMENT OF SEPSIS
052
272013120 1976 COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY 17(1):195-201
BONSTEDT T; SMITH JJ
ONE YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH PEER REVIEW IN A PSYCHIATRIC-HOSPITAL
02
2731262930 2002 TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY 30(1):88-92
Boorman GA; Haseman JK; Waters MD; Hardisty JF; Sills RC
Quality review procedures necessary for rodent pathology Databases and toxicogenomic studies: The National Toxicology Program experience
04
274172523 2001 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 76(9):889-896
Bordage G
Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: The strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports
17
275011448 1994 KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION 21(2):108-108
BORKO H
GUARDIANS OF SCIENCE - FAIRNESS AND RELIABILITY OF THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - DANIEL,HD
00
276011994 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):138-138
BORNSTEIN RF
THE PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A NEGLECTED ISSUE
36
277251438 1994 JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE 182(8):483-484
BORNSTEIN RF
THE GATEKEEPERS OF PSYCHOLOGY - EVALUATION OF PEER-REVIEW BY CASE-HISTORY - HARCUM,ER, ROSEN,EF
00
2780102772 2002 CORTEX 38(3):403-405
Bornstein RF
Peer-review in neuropsychology: Can we increase effectiveness without sacrificing rigor?
01
2794233076 2003 MEDICINA CLINICA 121(6):228-230
Bosch F; Guardiola E; Grp Trabajo Esteve Fdn Workshop 20
Abridged checklist for the evaluation of basic biomedical research papers
00
28011534 1984 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 66(5):166-166
BOSCH JK
PEER-REVIEW OF PEER-REVIEW
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
28100656 1987 ACTA MEDICA SCANDINAVICA 221(1):1-2
BOTTIGER LE
PEER-REVIEW - DISCUSSED BY AN EXPERT
00
28201415 1982 PHYSICS TODAY 35(3):11-13
BOUQUARD ML
PEER-REVIEW REVISITED
00
283032207 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7191):1143-1143
Bourdillon P
Dutch system of peer review is different and effective
23
284122209 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7200):1724-1724
Bourdillon P
Dutch system of peer review is different and effective (vol 318, pg 1143, 1999)
00
2850321132 1992 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 304(6829):740-743
BOURDILLON P; CAMM PR; COHEN A; DAVIES ER; ENNIS WP; EVANS KT; HACKING PM; LAVELLE MI; LAWS JW; MCNULTY MR; ROBERTS CJ; ROBERTS GM; ROW G; SUTHERLAND R; WILLIAMS JE
INFLUENCE OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGISTS GUIDELINES ON HOSPITAL PRACTICE - A MULTICENTER STUDY
09
2860141257 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6870):110-111
BOURDILLON P; DAVIES ER; ENNIS WP; EVANS KT; HACKING PM; LAWS JW; MCNULTY MR; ROBERTS CJ; ROBERTS GM; SUTHERLAND R
INFLUENCE OF ROYAL-COLLEGE-OF-RADIOLOGISTS GUIDELINES ON REFERRAL FROM GENERAL-PRACTICE
014
2870191117 1992 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 117(9):788-791
BOVBJERG RR
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - FOLKLORE, FACTS, AND THE FUTURE
012
2885202613 2001 JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE 49(1):77-84
Bovier PA; Guillain H; Perneger TV
Productivity of medical research in Switzerland
00
2890087 1975 AMERICAN SCIENTIST 63(6):624-626
BOWERS R
PEER REVIEW SYSTEM ON TRIAL
24
290001851 1997 CIVIL ENGINEERING 67(11):29-29
Bowles JE
Peer-review prejudice
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2912132285 1999 MEDICAL EDUCATION 33(3):212-214
Bowrey DJ; Morris-Stiff GJ; Clark GWB; Carey PD; Mansel RE
Peer-reviewed publication following presentation at a regional surgical meeting
01
2920731984 1998 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW 63(2):200-224
Boyd EA
Bureaucratic authority in the "company of equals": The interactional management of medical peer
012
293001775 1996 PHYSICS WORLD 9(11):13-14
Braben D
The repressive regime of peer-review bureaucracy?
00
294002888 2002 PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS 314(1-4):768-773
Braben DW
Blue Skies Research and the global economy
00
295001749 1996 LANCET 347(9006):957-957
Bradbury J
Interactive peer-review trial starts in Australia
00
29600882 1989 TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES 14(6):213-213
BRADSHAW RA
PEER-REVIEW AND PUBLISHING - REPLY
00
297011314 1993 NATURE 364(6434):183-183
BRADSHAW RH; BUBIER NE
REFORM OPTIONS FOR PEER-REVIEW
12
298021307 1993 LANCET 342(8882):1293-1293
BRAHAMS D
PEER-REVIEW OF A LONDON HOSPITAL
00
2990111454 1994 METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE 33(2):196-204
BRAND R; VANHEMEL OJS; ELFERINKSTINKENS PM; VERLOOVEVANHORICK SP
COMPARING MORTALITY AND MORBIDITY IN HOSPITALS - THEORY AND PRACTICE OF QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN PEER-REVIEW
23
30000613 1986 CLINICAL RESEARCH 34(4):473-476
BRANDT EN
PEER-REVIEW - THE ATTACKS FROM WITHOUT
01

Page 3:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14