Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Fri Jul 9 10:34:30 2004
Topic Search: "Peer Review" plus the following:
LOCK S, 1986, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED,
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE,
BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231
COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC,

Nodes: 3179
Authors: 5486, Journals: 1041, Outer References: 34852
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by first author.
Page 12:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1101001 1969 FDA PAPERS 3(9):4-&
HAMPSHIR.GD
NAS-NRC DRUG EFFICACY STUDY - PEER REVIEW
01
11020152932 2002 TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY 20(12):S39-S44
Hancock WS; Wu SL; Stanley RR; Gombocz EA
Publishing large proteome datasets: scientific policy meets emerging technologies
02
1103011016 1991 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 303(6800):433-433
HANCOCKS S
AUDIT AND PEER-REVIEW FOR DENTISTS
00
110400842 1989 JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH 68(9):1375-1375
HAND AR; DAWES C
CONFERENCE REPORT - 1ST INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATIONS, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, MAY 10-12, 1989
01
110500413 1982 MINNESOTA MEDICINE 65(12):759-760
HANDLER S
IS PEER-REVIEW EFFECTIVE
00
11060342887 2002 PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE 24(4):132-138
Hands D; Stephens M; Brown D
A systematic review of the clinical and economic impact of drug information services on patient outcome
00
1107001178 1992 JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS 5(1):125-131
HANIGAN WC; ANDERSON RJ
NASCIS-2 - COMMENTARY
010
1108182335 2000 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 75(2):174-176
Hanna E; Premi J; Turnbull J
Results of remedial continuing medical education in dyscompetent physicians
05
1109071181 1992 KNOWLEDGE-CREATION DIFFUSION UTILIZATION 13(4):471-478
HANNA JL
SATANIC VERSES IN ACADEMIC PUBLISHING - TRUTH, POLITICS, AND CONSEQUENCES - COMMENTARY
00
1110001445 1994 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 204(9):1352-1353
HANNAH HW
PEER-REVIEW - PROS AND CONS
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1111011429 1994 JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION 44(1):52-64
HANSEN KA
PUBLICATION PEER-REVIEW - AN ANNOTATED-BIBLIOGRAPHY - SPECK,BW
00
111211681 1987 JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES 32(3):581-583
HANZLICK R
PEER-REVIEW IN THE COURTROOM - DISCUSSION
00
1113002532 2001 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY 281(2):H467-H467
Harder DR
Electronic peer review: benefits outweigh the learning curve
00
1114110734 1988 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW 53(1):157-160
HARGENS LL
FURTHER EVIDENCE ON FIELD DIFFERENCES IN CONSENSUS FROM THE NSF PEER-REVIEW STUDIES - REPLY
05
1115216914 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1348-1352
HARGENS LL
VARIATION IN JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW SYSTEMS - POSSIBLE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
417
11160222658 2001 PALLIATIVE MEDICINE 15(1):49-54
Hargreaves PN; Peppiatt R
Is videotaping of consultations acceptable to patients attending a hospice day centre?
00
1117071584 1995 JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY 109(4):317-319
HARKNESS P; BROWN P; FOWLER S; GRANT H; TOPHAM J
A CONFIDENTIAL COMPARATIVE AUDIT OF STAPEDECTOMIES - RESULTS OF THE ROYAL-COLLEGE-OF-SURGEONS-OF-ENGLAND COMPARATIVE AUDIT OF ENT SURGERY 1994
08
1118081852 1997 CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY 22(2):147-151
Harkness P; Brown P; Fowler S; Topham J
A national audit of sinus surgery. Results of the Royal College of Surgeons of England comparative audit of ENT surgery
07
11190401872 1997 HUMAN RELATIONS 50(11):1427-1460
Harley S; Lee FS
Research selectivity, managerialism, and the academic labor process: The future of nonmainstream economics in UK universities
03
112006954 1990 SCIENCE 249(4972):972-973
HARLING OK
BORON NEUTRON-CAPTURE THERAPY - THE ROLE OF PEER-REVIEW
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
11210381994 1998 AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION 42(3):285-302
Harman G
Supporting quality research in institutions of higher education
00
112225318 1980 SCIENCE 208(4447):974-&
HARNAD S
PEER-REVIEW - AN EXPERIMENT
11
112325587 1985 SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES (52):55-62
HARNAD S
RATIONAL DISAGREEMENT IN PEER-REVIEW
00
112411638 1986 NATURE 322(6074):24-25
HARNAD S
A DIFFICULT BALANCE - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICINE - LOCK,S
35
11250151825 1997 ANTIQUITY 71(274):1042-1048
Harnad S
Learned inquiry and the Net: the role of peer review, peer commentary and copyright
22
11262222113 1998 LEARNED PUBLISHING 11(4):283-292
Harnad S
Learned inquiry and the Net: the role of peer review, peer commentary and copyright
02
1127001220 1992 TECHNOLOGY REVIEW 95(3):7-7
HARRIGAN TP
PEER-REVIEW RECONSIDERED
00
11280312346 2000 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY 15(6):241-250
Harrington C; Weinberg J; Merrill S; Newman J
Medicare beneficiary complaints about quality of care
00
1129002463 2000 MATERIALS WORLD 8(5):57-57
Harris J
Peer review
00
11302121011 1991 BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER 64(2):315-320
HARRIS M; HARTLEY AL; BLAIR V; BIRCH JM; BANERJEE SS; FREEMONT AJ; MCCLURE J; MCWILLIAM LJ
SARCOMAS IN NORTH-WEST ENGLAND .1. HISTOPATHOLOGICAL PEER-REVIEW
228
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
11310192376 2000 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 163(9):1163-1166
Harris S; Buchinski B; Gryzbowski S; Janssen P; Mitchell GWE; Farquharson D
Induction of labour: a continuous quality improvement and peer review program to improve the quality of care
23
1132222554 2001 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 164(1):16-16
Harris S; Buchinski B; Grzybowski S; Janssen P; Mitchell GWE; Farquharson D
Induction of labour: a continuous quality improvement and peer review program to improve the quality of care (vol 163, pg 1163, 2000)
00
1133022863 2002 LIBRI 52(4):199-203
Harrison J
Going for gold
01
11343281127 1992 BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER 66(4):685-691
HARTLEY AL; BLAIR V; HARRIS M; BIRCH JM; BANERJEE SS; FREEMONT AJ; MCCLURE J; MCWILLIAM LJ
SARCOMAS IN NORTH-WEST ENGLAND .3. SURVIVAL
05
11350162829 2002 JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH 56(8):563-568
Hartley AM; Griffiths RK; Saunders KL
An evaluation of clinical governance in the public health departments of the West Midlands Region
00
1136091740 1996 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE 22(5):349-356
Hartley J; Sydes M; Blurton A
Obtaining information accurately and quickly: Are structured abstracts more efficient?
014
1137212963 1990 SCIENTOMETRICS 19(5-6):419-425
HARTMANN I; NEIDHARDT F
PEER-REVIEW AT THE DEUTSCHE-FORSCHUNGSGEMEINSCHAFT
58
1138001382 1994 DIABETOLOGIA 37():A176-A176
HARTMANN P; BOTT U; GRUSSER M; KRONSBEIN P; JORGENS V
EFFECTS OF PEER-REVIEW GROUPS ON DOCUMENTATION OF DIABETES-RELATED PATIENT DATA IN PHYSICIANS PRACTICE - RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE CONTROLLED-STUDY
00
113901549 1985 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 290(6486):1984-1985
HARTNELL GG
PEER-REVIEW AT WORK
01
11401111286 1993 HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 27(6):765-777
HARTZ AJ; GOTTLIEB MS; KUHN EM; RIMM AA
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ADJUSTED HOSPITAL MORTALITY AND THE RESULTS OF PEER-REVIEW
022
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
11410511112 1992 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 82(12):1631-1640
HARTZ AJ; KUHN EM; KAYSER KL; PRYOR DP; GREEN R; RIMM AA
ASSESSING PROVIDERS OF CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION - A METHOD FOR PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS
027
1142092699 2001 TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES 61(2):201-210
Haseman JK; Bailer AJ; Kodell RL; Morris R; Portier K
Statistical issues in the analysis of low-dose endocrine disruptor data
06
11431462161 1998 TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY 26(3):428-441
Haseman JK; Hailey JR; Morris RW
Spontaneous neoplasm incidences in Fischer 344 rats and B6C3F(1) mice in two-year carcinogenicity studies: A National Toxicology Program update
251
1144018338 1981 JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW 6(1):136-158
HASTINGS DA
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS AND CONFIDENTIALITY - THE QUESTION OF PUBLIC-ACCESS TO MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW DATA THROUGH THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
01
114500468 1983 JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW 8(2):293-313
HASTINGS DA
LEGAL ISSUES RAISED BY PRIVATE REVIEW ACTIVITIES OF MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS
12
1146113284 1980 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 70(3):222-228
HASTINGS GE; SONNEBORN R; LEE GH; VICK L; SASMOR L
PEER-REVIEW CHECKLIST - REPRODUCIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF A METHOD FOR EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF AMBULATORY CARE
512
1147372059 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):273-274
Hatch CL; Goodman SN
Perceived value of providing peer reviewers with abstracts and preprints of related published and unpublished papers
11
1148002075 1998 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION ETHICS 7(2):3-3
Hauptman R
Problems with peer review
00
11490822114 1998 MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 44(12):1670-1689
Hauser JR
Research, development, and engineering metrics
08
11500641505 1995 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION 9(5):371-378
HAWKS SR; HULL ML; THALMAN RL; RICHINS PM
REVIEW OF SPIRITUAL HEALTH - DEFINITION, ROLE, AND INTERVENTION STRATEGIES IN HEALTH PROMOTION
015
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
115103985 1991 AREA 23(4):361-364
HAY AM
A PEERS REVIEW OF A REVIEW OF PEER-REVIEW
00
1152031090 1991 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 80(10):494-496
HAY IT; ELLIS JB; ROBERTSON J; JACOBS DJ; MOKGABUDI A
DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS - APPLICATION IN A PEDIATRIC DEPARTMENT
00
1153002697 2001 TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION 48(3):261-262
Hayhoe GF
Something so right: Why i'm proud of our review process
00
1154001076 1991 REGIONAL ANESTHESIA 16(6):341-347
HAYNES RB; ALTMAN DG; MULROW CD; GARDNER MJ; HUTH EJ
MORE INFORMATIVE ABSTRACTS REVISITED (REPRINTED FROM ANNALS INTERNAL MED, VOL 113, PG 69-76, 1990)
00
11550441704 1996 CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL 33(1):1-9
Haynes RB; Mulrow CD; Huth EJ; Altman DG; Gardner MJ
More informative abstracts revisited
01
1156001692 1996 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 312(7046):1611-1611
Haynes RB; Sackett DL
Evidence-based medicine - Letters pages are essential for peer review - Reply
01
115700201 1978 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY 32(1):54-54
HAYS C
OUTMODED PEER REVIEW
00
115801195 1977 PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS 41(2):519-525
HAYS JR
3 METHODS OF PEER REVIEW IN A STATE MENTAL-HOSPITAL SYSTEM
11
1159001603 1995 MILITARY MEDICINE 160(10):496-500
HAYUNGA EG; TROUMBLEY PF; CHEUNG GP
INDIVIDUAL MOBILIZATION AUGMENTATION - RECIPE FOR AN EFFECTIVE TOTAL FORCE PARTNERSHIP
01
1160001141 1992 CLINICAL RESEARCH 40(2):A583-A583
HAYWARD RA; MCMAHON LF; BERNARD AM
IMPLICIT QUALITY REVIEW OF GENERAL MEDICINE INPATIENTS - PEERING AT PEER-REVIEW
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
11614221238 1993 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 118(7):550-556
HAYWARD RA; MCMAHON LF; BERNARD AM
EVALUATING THE CARE OF GENERAL MEDICINE INPATIENTS - HOW GOOD IS IMPLICIT REVIEW
1749
1162002307 1999 PHYSICS TODAY 52(2):92-92
Hazlewood CF
Journal's history and peer review process were misrepresented
00
11630211308 1993 LANGUAGE IN SOCIETY 22(3):403-420
HE AW
LANGUAGE USE IN PEER-REVIEW TEXTS
00
1164081612 1995 NUCLEAR SAFETY 36(2):278-289
Heames TJ; KhatibRahbar M; Kelly JE; JenksJohnson RP; Chen YS
The hierarchy-by-interval approach to identifying important models that need improvement in severe-accident simulation codes
00
1165162413 2000 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 12(3):177-182
Heaton C
External peer review in Europe: an overview from the ExPeRT project
35
1166162563 2001 CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 15(5):1269-1273
Hecht A; Parkin MJ
Improving peer review of listings and recovery plans under the Endangered Species Act
00
116700266 1979 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 301(19):1068-1068
HECHT F
DECLINE OF NIHS PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM
00
1168002595 2001 JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME 83A(1):1-2
Heckman JD
Excellence through peer review
00
1169022415 2000 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 12(3):227-230
Heidemann EG
Moving to global standards for accreditation processes: the ExPeRT Project in a larger context
13
1170122526 2001 ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA 79(5):433-434
Heijl A
Developing the peer review system of Acta Ophthalmologica
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1171081645 1995 SCIENTOMETRICS 34(3):391-400
Helander E
Evaluation activities in the Nordic countries
02
1172001488 1994 SEMINARS IN DIALYSIS 7(2):98-102
HELD PJ; PORT FK; WOLFE RA; LEVIN NW; TURENNE MN
ON REPLACING PEER-REVIEW WITH LEGAL CHALLENGE IN SCIENTIFIC-RESEARCH - AN OPINION
01
11730551424 1994 JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES 34(3):627-636
HELLER SR; BIGWOOD DW; MAY WE
EXPERT-SYSTEMS FOR EVALUATING PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY-VALUES .1. AQUEOUS SOLUBILITY
05
11740181225 1993 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 68(1):7-19
HELMS LB; HELMS CM
LITIGATION INVOLVING MEDICAL-FACULTY AND ACADEMIC MEDICAL-CENTERS, 1950-1991
02
1175032694 2001 SOCIETY 38(2):47-54
Henderson A
Undermining peer review
00
117600311 1980 MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA 1(10):500-&
HENDERSON DA
CONTINUING-EDUCATION AND PEER-REVIEW
00
117705164 1977 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 36(8):2066-2068
HENLEY C
PEER REVIEW OF RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATIONS AT NATIONAL-INSTITUTES-OF-HEALTH .1. ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL PROCESSES
412
117801165 1977 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 36(9):2186-2190
HENLEY C
PEER REVIEW OF RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATIONS AT NATIONAL-INSTITUTES-OF-HEALTH .2. REVIEW BY AN INITIAL REVIEW GROUP
412
117900166 1977 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 36(10):2335-2338
HENLEY C
PEER REVIEW OF RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATIONS AT NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH 3 REVIEW BY AN ADVISORY BOARD-COUNCIL
411
1180021765 1996 NATURE 384(6608):401-401
Henneberg M
A case for instant peer review?
02
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
11810992367 2000 AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL 45(3):150-172
Henry PJ
Tooth loss and implant replacement
02
11820281632 1995 RESEARCH POLICY 24(6):959-979
Herbertz H; MullerHill B
Quality and efficiency of basic research in molecular biology: A bibliometric analysis of thirteen excellent research institutes
04
1183001434 1994 JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE 9(4):238-238
HERMAN CJ
QUALITY OF PEER-REVIEW
00
1184282635 2001 LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH 23(1):1-3
Hernon PP; Schwartz CC
Peer review
00
1185002289 1999 NATURE 397(6719):467-467
Herrera AJ
Language bias discredits the peer-review system
00
11860121020 1991 COLLEGE COMPOSITION AND COMMUNICATION 42(2):184-199
HERRINGTON AJ; CADMAN D
PEER-REVIEW AND REVISING IN AN ANTHROPOLOGY COURSE - LESSONS FOR LEARNING
27
118701857 1989 NATURE 340(6233):424-424
HERSHEY DR
PEER-REVIEW
01
11885731848 1997 CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS 40(1):21-32
Heupler FA; Chambers CE; Dear WE; Angello DA; Heisler M
Guidelines for internal peer review in the cardiac catheterization laboratory
03
1189091222 1992 WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 157(5):569-571
HEYDORN WH; MONCRIEF WH
SIMULTANEOUS RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ABDOMINAL-AORTA AND CHOLECYSTECTOMY - A PEER-REVIEW PERSPECTIVE
13
11901302619 2001 JOURNAL OF NUTRITION 131(9):2591S-2595S
Heyland DK
In search of the magic nutraceutical: Problems with current approaches
04
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
119111964 1990 SOCIAL FORCES 69(2):634-634
HIGGINS AC
PEERLESS SCIENCE - PEER-REVIEW AND UNITED-STATES SCIENCE POLICY - CHUBIN,DE, HACKETT,EJ
00
11920080 1974 PHYSICAL THERAPY 54(9):943-948
HIGHTOWE.AB; GRIFFIN JW
PEER REVIEW - ADVENTURE IN REAL LIFE
00
11930362003 1998 BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE 62(2):661-674
Hilborn R
The economic performance of marine stock enhancement projects
014
119400629 1986 JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS 9(4):241-241
HILDEBRANDT RW; LAWRENCE DJ
PEER-REVIEW IN THE JMPT
00
1195001126 1992 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY 62(3):204-208
HILL DA; LENNOX AF; NEIL MJ; SHEEHY JP
EVALUATION OF TRISS AS A MEANS OF SELECTING TRAUMA DEATHS FOR CLINICAL PEER-REVIEW
312
1196001249 1993 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY 63(12):940-945
HILL DA; WEST RH; DUFLOU J
VALUE OF THE PROSPECTIVE BEFORE AND AFTER STUDY AS A METHODOLOGY TO EVALUATE OUTCOME IN A TRAUMA CENTER
09
119700140 1976 SCIENCE 194(4268):894-894
HILL HZ
PEER REVIEW - PREVENTING NEPOTISM
00
119802236 1979 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGIST 14(4):215-218
HILLER DV; DILLINGHAM HC
IMPACT OF RIGHT-OF-ACCESS UPON PEER-REVIEW - EDITORIAL ESSAY
00
119903243 1979 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGIST 14(4):228-230
HILLER DV; DILLINGHAM HC
IMPACT OF RIGHT-OF-ACCESS UPON PEER-REVIEW - REJOINDER
00
120003778 1974 NURSING RESEARCH 23(4):292-300
HINSHAW AS; FIELD MA
INVESTIGATION OF VARIABLES THAT UNDERLIE COLLEGIAL EVALUATION - PEER REVIEW
00

Page 12:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14