Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Fri Jul 9 10:35:00 2004
Topic Search: "Peer Review" plus the following:
LOCK S, 1986, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED,
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE,
BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231
COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC,

Nodes: 3179
Authors: 5486, Journals: 1041, Outer References: 34852
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by year, source, volume, issue, page.
Page 27:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
26010602601 2001 JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES 39(4):719-746
Hodson D; Maher I
The open method as a new mode of governance: The case of soft economic policy co-ordination
021
26022372602 2001 JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING 17(4):420-432
Lin SSJ; Liu EZF; Yuan SM
Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles
02
26031212603 2001 JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING 14(2):107-110
Jackson GW; Davidson HC; Wiggins RH; Harnsberger HR
Electronic submission of academic works: A survey of current editorial practices of radiologic journals
02
2604022604 2001 JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING 14(2):222-223
Passadore DJ; Isoardi RA; Ariza PP; Padin C
Use of a low-cost, PC-based image review workstation at a radiology department
03
26050122605 2001 JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY 34():1-6
Wagner GS; Engblom H; Billgren T; Carlsson M; Hedstrom E; Ugander M; Selvester RHS; Arheden H; Eisenstein E; Kasper J; White R
A method for assembling a collaborative research team from multiple disciplines and academic centers to study the relationships between ECG estimation and MRI measurement of myocardial infarct size
00
26060112606 2001 JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY 34(1):41-47
Anderson ST; Pahlm O; Bacharova L; Barbagelata A; Chaitman BR; Clemmensen P; Goodman S; Heden B; Klootwijk PJ; Lauer M; MacFarlane PW; Rautaharju P; Reddy S; Selvester RH; Sgarbossa EB; Underwood D; Warner RA; Wagner GS
Standards for the function of an academic 12-lead electrocardiographic core laboratory
00
2607042607 2001 JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES 46(6):1303-1308
Wiggins KG
Forensic textile fiber examination across the USA and Europe
02
26080382608 2001 JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY IN HIGHER EDUCATION 25(3):321-339
Reed M; Mitchell B
Using information technologies for collaborative learning in geography: a case study from Canada
03
26090412609 2001 JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA 10(4):348-353
Budenz DL; Singh K
Glaucoma care in West Africa
01
2610012610 2001 JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME 26A(5):811-812
[Anon]
Use and misuse of peer review publications
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
26111522611 2001 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE 27(1):1-7
Cronin B
Bibliometrics and beyond: Some thoughts on web-based citation analysis
135
26121702612 2001 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 16(2):99-112
Bergquist M; Ljungberg J; Lundh-Snis U
Practising peer review in organizations: a qualifier for knowledge dissemination and legitimization
00
26135202613 2001 JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE 49(1):77-84
Bovier PA; Guillain H; Perneger TV
Productivity of medical research in Switzerland
00
2614002614 2001 JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS 29(3-4):411-413
Aske JR
Evidence: No medical peer review privilege in discrimination actions
00
26150602615 2001 JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES 38(1):87-101
Barry J; Chandler J; Clark H
Between the Ivory Tower and the academic assembly line
06
26161542616 2001 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING 8(2):77-85
McCann J; Britton PD; Warren RML; Hunnam G; East Anglian Breast Screening Prog
Radiological peer review of interval cancers in the East Anglian breast screening programme: what are we missing?
15
2617112617 2001 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING 8(3):168-168
McCann J; Britton PD; Warren RML; Hunnam G
Radiological peer review of interval cancers in the East Anglian breast screening programme: what are we missing (vol 8, pg 77, 2001)
00
2618062618 2001 JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH 46(4):217-225
McDermott J; Beck D; Buffington ST; Annas J; Supratikto G; Prenggono D; Ekonomi MFS; Achadi E
Two models of in-service training to improve midwifery skills: How well do they work?
01
26191302619 2001 JOURNAL OF NUTRITION 131(9):2591S-2595S
Heyland DK
In search of the magic nutraceutical: Problems with current approaches
04
26200122620 2001 JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT 76(3):369-378
Wood JM; Nezworski MT; Stejskal WJ; Garven S
Advancing scientific discourse in the controversy surrounding the comprehensive system for the Rorschach: A rejoinder to Meyer (2000)
04
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
26210112621 2001 JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH 20(3):1293-1298
Leonard DL
National Indicator Study: Is an international approach feasible?
00
26222572622 2001 JOURNAL OF SPORTS CHIROPRACTIC & REHABILITATION 15(1):5-19
Green BN; Johnson CD; Adams A
Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade
00
2623002623 2001 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY 37(2):197A-197A
Wiles JD; Samra JS; Gill R; Deedwania PC
Can the external peer review process provide adequate feedback to sustain the implementation of the heart failure guidelines by primary care providers?
00
26242302624 2001 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 91(4):210-218
Menz HB
Publication patterns and perceptions of the Australian podiatric medical faculty
12
2625012625 2001 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 52(11):984-985
Stirling DA
Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses.
00
2626002626 2001 JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 122(3):419-420
Wechsler AS
Peer review: Recognition and responsibility
11
2627002627 2001 LANCET 358(9286):991-991
McLellan F
Peer-review meeting participants urge greater accountability
00
2628032628 2001 LANCET 358(9294):1723-1724
La Montagne JR
Biotechnology and research: promise and problems
01
2629142629 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(1):33-40
Tomlins CL
Just one more 'zine? Maintaining and improving the scholarly journal in the electronic present: a view from the humanities
00
26307152630 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(2):85-91
van Rooyen S
The evaluation of peer-review quality
11
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
26311372631 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(2):113-121
Shashok K
Author's editors: facilitators of science information transfer
01
2632132632 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(2):151-158
Wood D
Online peer review: current options
11
26336192633 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(4):257-263
Wager E; Jefferson T
Shortcomings of peer review in biomedical journals
12
26345292634 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(4):273-285
Shum SB; Sumner T
JIME: an interactive journal for interactive media (Reprinted from First Monday, vol 6, 2001)
00
2635282635 2001 LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH 23(1):1-3
Hernon PP; Schwartz CC
Peer review
00
2636022636 2001 LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH 23(4):371-372
White MD
Editorial peer review, its strengths and weaknesses
00
2637002637 2001 LIBRARY JOURNAL 126(15):57-57
Cronin B
Peer review and the stuff of scholarship
00
26382332638 2001 MEDICAL EDUCATION 35():2-8
Southgate L; Cox Y; David T; Hatch D; Howes A; Johnson N; Jolly B; Macdonald E; McAvoy P; McCrorie P; Turner Y
The assessment of poorly performing doctors: the development of the assessment programmes for the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures
413
26392362639 2001 MEDICAL EDUCATION 35():9-19
Southgate L; Cox J; David T; Hatch D; Howes A; Johnson N; Jolly B; Macdonald E; McAvoy P; McCrorie P; Turner J
The General Medical Council's Performance Procedures: peer review of performance in the workplace
17
26401302640 2001 MEDICAL EDUCATION 35():20-28
Southgate L; Campbell M; Cox Y; Foulkes O; Jolly B; McCrorie P; Tombleson P
The General Medical Council's Performance Procedures: the development and implementation of tests of competence with examples from general practice
04
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2641152641 2001 MEDICAL EDUCATION 35():29-35
McAvoy PA; McCrorie P; Jolly B; Ayers AB; Cox J; Howes AD; Macdonald EB; Slimmon DJ; Southgate L
Training the assessors for the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures
01
2642002642 2001 MEDICAL EDUCATION 35(11):1089-1090
Gray L
Use of psychophysical scaling for peer-review in problem-based learning
00
26430672643 2001 MEDICAL TEACHER 23(3):231-244
Brown G; Manogue M
AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 22: Refreshing lecturing: a guide for lecturers
04
2644002644 2001 METEORITICS & PLANETARY SCIENCE 36(12):1569-1569
Lyon I
The importance of peer review
01
2645022645 2001 NATURE 410(6830):739-739
Haley RW
Gulf syndrome research has passed peer review
01
2646042646 2001 NATURE 414(6862):393-394
Roy R; Ashburn JR
The perils of peer review
13
2647002647 2001 NATURE IMMUNOLOGY 2(4):277-277
Rocha B
Trouble with peer review
00
2648002648 2001 NATURE IMMUNOLOGY 2(10):892-892
Klein JR
More about peer review: is it time for double-blind reviews?
00
26490272649 2001 NEUROTOXICOLOGY 22(5):667-675
Jacobson JL
Contending with contradictory data in a risk assessment context: The case of methylmercury
05
2650002650 2001 NEW REPUBLIC 225(2-3):18-19
Chait J
Peer review - William F. Buckley steals a colleague's work.
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2651002651 2001 NUCLEAR ENERGY-JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH NUCLEAR ENERGY SOCIETY 40(2):119-122
Earp JE
UK Nuclear power plants - aspiring to world-class performance
00
26520262652 2001 NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY 133(3):269-289
Guan Y; Li F; Modarres M
Application of the integrated TH-PA method to the Westinghouse AP600 design
01
26534122653 2001 NURSE EDUCATION TODAY 21(3):238-242
Burnard P; Hannigan B
Reviewing the review process: towards good practice in the peer review of manuscripts submitted to nursing journals
13
26540222654 2001 NURSE EDUCATION TODAY 21(6):444-454
Costello J; Pateman B; Pusey H; Longshaw K
Peer review of classroom teaching: an interim report
00
26550212655 2001 NURSING OUTLOOK 49(5):217-222
Nelson ML
A model for scholarship in nursing: The case of a private liberal arts college
00
26561202656 2001 OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY 56(3):121-123
MacLennan AH
A guest editorial from abroad: Medicolegal opinion - Time for peer review
02
2657012657 2001 ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW 25(6):409-409
Calvert P
Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses
00
26580222658 2001 PALLIATIVE MEDICINE 15(1):49-54
Hargreaves PN; Peppiatt R
Is videotaping of consultations acceptable to patients attending a hospice day centre?
00
265921412659 2001 PHARMACOTHERAPY 21(4):395-404
Sylvia LM; Herbel JL
Manuscript peer review - A guide for health care professionals
11
26600192660 2001 PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE 23(2):41-45
King MA; Roberts MS
Multidisciplinary case conference reviews: improving outcomes for nursing home residents, carers and health professionals
03
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
26611222661 2001 PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE 23(3):111-115
Radley A; Millar B; Hamley J
Development of patient-centred performance indicators to guide the delivery of pharmaceutical care in a district general hospital
00
2662022662 2001 PHYSICA MEDICA 17():90-91
Lewis CA
Recognition of the qualified expert in the United Kingdom
00
26630192663 2001 PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 108(2):460-465
Zbar RIS; Otake LR; Miller MJ; Persing JA; Dingman DL
Web-based medicine as a means to establish centers of surgical excellence in the developing world
00
26640722664 2001 POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY 22(2):293-308
Cole ER; Stewart AJ
Invidious comparisons: Imagining a psychology of race and gender beyond differences
04
26657692665 2001 PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER 53(4):511-521
Berg LD
Masculinism, emplacement, and positionality in peer review
011
2666002666 2001 PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS 34(1):1-1
Singer JD
Micromanagement and peer review
01
2667022667 2001 PSYCOLOQUY 12(12):1-4
Turner R
An end to great publishing myths - Book review of Tenopir and King on electronic-journals
03
2668032668 2001 PSYCOLOQUY 12(19):art. no.-11
Meyer J
Scientific journals by and for scientists - Book review of Tenopir and King on electronic journals
00
2669032669 2001 PSYCOLOQUY 12(21):1-3
Mills ME
Authors of the world unite: Liberating academic content from publishers' restrictions - Book review of Tenopir & King on Electronic Journals
00
2670042670 2001 PSYCOLOQUY 12(22):1-4
Oullier O; Michel-Kerjan E
Does scientific publication need a peer consensus? Commentary on Stodolsky on consensus-journals
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2671152671 2001 PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS 116():254-256
Sattin RW
The prevention research initiative and the peer review process at CDC
01
26720492672 2001 QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 10(3):166-172
Katbamna S; Baker R; Ahmad W; Bhakta P; Parker G
Development of guidelines to facilitate improved support of South Asian carers by primary health care teams
02
26730252673 2001 RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS 32(1):27-51
Baliga S; Sjostrom T
Optimal design of peer review and self-assessment schemes
01
26740212674 2001 REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY 33(1):60-65
Hofelt CS; Honeycutt M; McCoy JT; Haws LC
Development of a metabolism factor for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons for use in multipathway risk assessments of hazardous waste combustion facilities
01
26750232675 2001 REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY 34(3):249-257
Sailstad DM; Hattan D; Hill RN; Stokes WS
ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay - I. The ICCVAM review process
06
26760622676 2001 REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY 34(3):258-273
Dean JH; Twerdok LE; Tice RR; Sailstad DM; Hattan DG; Stokes WS
ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay - II. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel
011
2677292677 2001 RESEARCH POLICY 30(3):357-361
Rinia EJ; van Leeuwen TN; van Vuren HG; van Raan AFJ
Influence of interdisciplinarity on peer-review and bibliometric evaluations in physics research
02
2678272678 2001 REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE 129(1):7-8
Reyes H; Kauffmann R; Andresen M
The International Advisory Committee
11
2679002679 2001 SCIENCE 291(5506):959-959
Pokrovsky V
Russian science - Danger to peer review is in eye of beholder
00
2680002680 2001 SCIENCE 291(5513):2533-+
Mervis J
Peer review - NSF scores low on using own criteria
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2681002681 2001 SCIENCE 293(5533):1234-1234
Marshall E
Biomedical policy - NIH wins an exemption from HHS peer-review overhaul
00
2682002682 2001 SCIENCE 293(5538):2187-2188
Enserink M
Scientific publishing - Peer review and quality: A dubious connection?
11
2683002683 2001 SCIENCE 294(5545):1255-+
Malakoff D
Science policy - Peer-review critic gets NIH 'rejects'
11
26846292684 2001 SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 7(2):193-204
Atkinson M
'Peer review' culture
00
2685022685 2001 SCIENTIST 15(15):6-6
Berezin AA
Peer review: Open, not anonymous
00
2686022686 2001 SCIENTIST 15(21):39-39
Weller AC
Peer review: Do studies prove its effectiveness?
10
2687112687 2001 SCIENTIST 15(23):6-6
Hallman G
Peer review
00
26880292688 2001 SCIENTOMETRICS 50(1):83-98
Noyons E
Bibliometric mapping of science in a science policy context
08
26892212689 2001 SCIENTOMETRICS 50(3):523-537
Hornbostel S
Third party funding of German universities. An indicator of research activity?
00
2690062690 2001 SCIENTOMETRICS 51(1):311-318
Schwechheimer H; Winterhager M
Mapping interdisciplinary research fronts in neuroscience: A bibliometric view to retrograde amnesia
02
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2691032691 2001 SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 46(6):165-166
Wilson SM; Burke G
Clinical standards board for Scotland: Peer review visit
00
26921332692 2001 SOCIAL PROBLEMS 48(1):93-110
Miller J; Perrucci R
Back stage at Social Problems: An analysis of the editorial decision process, 1993-1996
02
26938242693 2001 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 31(6):820-841
Langfeldt L
The decision-making constraints and processes of grant peer review, and their effects on the review outcome
01
2694032694 2001 SOCIETY 38(2):47-54
Henderson A
Undermining peer review
00
26950312695 2001 SURGERY 129(6):655-661
Schein M; Paladugu R
Redundant surgical publications: Tip of the iceberg?
06
26960192696 2001 TAXON 50(2):381-387
Wilson HD
Informatics: new media and paths of data flow
06
2697002697 2001 TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION 48(3):261-262
Hayhoe GF
Something so right: Why i'm proud of our review process
00
2698052698 2001 TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY 29():20-23
Popp JA
Criteria for the evaluation of studies in transgenic models
05
2699092699 2001 TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES 61(2):201-210
Haseman JK; Bailer AJ; Kodell RL; Morris R; Portier K
Statistical issues in the analysis of low-dose endocrine disruptor data
06
27000842700 2001 TOXICOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL HEALTH 17(5-10):163-175
Birak P; Yurk J; Adeshina F; Lorber M; Pollard K; Choudhury H; Kroner S
Travis and Arms revisited: a second look at a widely used bioconcentration algorithm
01

Page 27:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14