Missing Links? Citation Matrix | Graphs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
LOCK S, 1985, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED, ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66 INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686 CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE, BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231 COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC, |
Nodes: 3294
Authors: 5593,
Journals: 1065,
Outer References: 36825
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by NCR.
Page 26: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2501 | 0 | 0 | 270 1979 PENNSYLVANIA MEDICINE 82(11):33-33
BELLER ML PEER-REVIEW - NO | 0 | 0 |
2502 | 0 | 0 | 271 1979 PENNSYLVANIA MEDICINE 82(12):14-14
SPEAKER F PEER-REVIEW AND WATERGATE | 0 | 0 |
2503 | 0 | 0 | 272 1979 PHYSICAL THERAPY 59(7):877-880
EGAN AM PEER-REVIEW - ONE DEPARTMENTS EXPERIENCES | 0 | 0 |
2504 | 0 | 0 | 273 1979 PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH 20(MAR):400-400
MCCLURE M; HUTCHINS R; MCKELVEY E; JOHNSON D ACTIVE INFORMATION DISSEMINATION FROM A CANCER DATA-BASE - THE ROLE OF PEER-REVIEW IN SELECTIVE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT | 0 | 0 |
2505 | 0 | 0 | 275 1979 SCIENCE 204(4393):601-602
MARSHALL E PEER-REVIEW COMES TO ADAMHA | 1 | 2 |
2506 | 0 | 0 | 282 1980 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 66(APR):451-454
SMITH WR PEER-REVIEW - ITS TIME HAS COME | 0 | 1 |
2507 | 0 | 0 | 287 1980 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 10(3):372-373
BREEN KJ THE SITE VISIT - A USEFUL TOOL IN POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL-EDUCATION AND IN PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2508 | 0 | 0 | 289 1980 AUSTRALIAN PAEDIATRIC JOURNAL 16(2):152-152
CARACHI R; KENT M; WOODWARD AA THE PLACE OF PEER-REVIEW IN PEDIATRIC-SURGERY | 0 | 0 |
2509 | 0 | 0 | 291 1980 BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY 25(1):24-24
SMOES ML PEDESTRIAN LOOK AT THE AMERICAN PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM | 0 | 0 |
2510 | 0 | 0 | 292 1980 CHEST 78(4):547-548
SOFFER A THE UNIQUE ROLE OF PEER-REVIEW JOURNALS | 1 | 5 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
2511 | 0 | 0 | 293 1980 CLINICAL RESEARCH 28(2):A292-A292
CHOKSHI AB; FRIEDMAN HS; MALACH MM; VASAVADA BC; BLEICHER SJ THE IMPACT OF PEER-REVIEW IN REDUCING THE NUMBER OF PERMANENT PACEMAKER INSERTIONS | 0 | 3 |
2512 | 0 | 0 | 295 1980 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 39(7):2349-2349
VOGEL FS THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM - COMMENT | 0 | 0 |
2513 | 0 | 0 | 299 1980 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 39(7):2351-2351
APIRION D THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM - REPLY | 0 | 0 |
2514 | 0 | 0 | 303 1980 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGISTS 42(6):344-345
BAIR DM SOLVE SOME PROBLEMS WITH A PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2515 | 0 | 0 | 304 1980 JOURNAL OF THE FLORIDA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 67(12):1083-1084
DEVER RC IN-HOUSE PEER-REVIEW SCREENING BY BLUE-CROSS-AND-BLUE-SHIELD-OF-FLORIDA | 0 | 0 |
2516 | 0 | 0 | 306 1980 MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA 1(2):84-85
LORD DJ PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2517 | 0 | 0 | 310 1980 MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA 1(9):446-447
JENSEN DM PEER-REVIEW AND CORONERS AUTOPSIES | 0 | 0 |
2518 | 0 | 0 | 311 1980 MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA 1(10):500-&
HENDERSON DA CONTINUING-EDUCATION AND PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2519 | 0 | 0 | 314 1980 NEUROSURGERY 6(3):340-341
MOSBERG WH THREAT TO CONFIDENTIALITY OF PEER-REVIEW DATA | 0 | 2 |
2520 | 0 | 0 | 315 1980 PENNSYLVANIA MEDICINE 83(11):15-16
SPEAKER F PEER-REVIEW, FOUNDATION RESTRAINTS SERVE PUBLIC | 0 | 0 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
2521 | 0 | 0 | 316 1980 PHARMACY MANAGEMENT 152(1):7-8
SIMONSMEIER LM LEGAL RISKS OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2522 | 0 | 0 | 317 1980 SCIENCE 207(4433):822-823
STUMPF WE PEER-REVIEW | 5 | 8 |
2523 | 0 | 0 | 322 1981 ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 141(9):1121-1121
SPODICK DH THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM AND THE EDITORS CORRESPONDENCE | 1 | 3 |
2524 | 0 | 0 | 325 1981 BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA 53(8):783-784
SPENCE AA SCIENTIFIC WRITING AND PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 3 |
2525 | 0 | 0 | 329 1981 CONNECTICUT MEDICINE 45(3):191-191
ISELE WP LEGAL UPDATE - A MARYLAND PEER-REVIEW CASE | 0 | 0 |
2526 | 0 | 0 | 331 1981 IEEE SPECTRUM 18(8):21-21
CHRISTIANSEN D PEER-REVIEW REVIEWED | 1 | 1 |
2527 | 0 | 0 | 332 1981 IEEE SPECTRUM 18(9):14-14
ESSEL CJ PEER-REVIEW REVIEWED | 0 | 0 |
2528 | 0 | 0 | 337 1981 JOURNAL OF FOOD & NUTRITION 38(3):127-130
THOMSON K EVALUATION OF DIETETIC PERFORMANCE DIETETIC AUDIT, PEER-REVIEW AND PERFORMANCE-APPRAISAL PROGRAMS | 0 | 0 |
2529 | 0 | 0 | 339 1981 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRY ASSOCIATION 71(4):224-229
DAVIS RH; GIBLEY CW ASSESSING PEER-REVIEW FOR RESEARCH | 0 | 0 |
2530 | 0 | 0 | 340 1981 MARYLAND STATE MEDICAL JOURNAL 30(6):59-66
TAYLOR B THE PEER-REVIEW COMMITTEE - AN INTERVIEW WITH MCHOLD,DAVID,S. | 0 | 0 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
2531 | 0 | 0 | 341 1981 MARYLAND STATE MEDICAL JOURNAL 30(6):67-&
MCHOLD DS; TOWNSEND C THE CHANGING DEMANDS OF PEER-REVIEW - INTRODUCTION TO THE PEER-REVIEW HANDBOOK | 0 | 0 |
2532 | 0 | 0 | 344 1981 NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL 93(676):45-46
PETTITT GA THE NELSON-BALINT GROUP - EVOLUTION OF ONE POSSIBLE METHOD FOR CONTINUING POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION AND CONSTRUCTIVE PEER-REVIEW IN SMALLER CENTERS | 0 | 1 |
2533 | 0 | 0 | 345 1981 OPTICAL SPECTRA 15(12):6-6
LAUREN TC REVIEWING THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM ... | 0 | 0 |
2534 | 0 | 0 | 348 1981 SCIENCE 212(4501):1335-&
KALT MR ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2535 | 0 | 0 | 349 1981 SCIENCE 212(4501):1335-1335
MCCREERY RL ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2536 | 0 | 0 | 351 1981 SCIENCE 212(4501):1337-1337
MORAWETZ H ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2537 | 0 | 0 | 352 1981 SCIENCE 212(4501):1337-1337
EASTER SS ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 2 |
2538 | 0 | 0 | 353 1981 SCIENCE 212(4501):1337-1337
JACOBS LS ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2539 | 0 | 0 | 354 1981 SCIENCE 212(4501):1337-1337
BIRNBAUM HK ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2540 | 0 | 0 | 355 1981 SCIENCE 212(4501):1337-1338
BERNS MW ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
2541 | 0 | 0 | 364 1982 ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE 10(1):70-70
BROWN TCK PEER-REVIEW IN ANESTHESIA | 0 | 0 |
2542 | 0 | 0 | 365 1982 ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE 10(2):107-107
BROWN TCK PEER-REVIEW IN ANESTHESIA | 0 | 1 |
2543 | 0 | 0 | 367 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):196-196
ADAIR RK A PHYSICS EDITOR COMMENTS ON PETERS AND CECIS PEER-REVIEW STUDY | 4 | 10 |
2544 | 0 | 0 | 368 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):200-201
BELSHAW C PEER-REVIEW AND THE CURRENT-ANTHROPOLOGY EXPERIENCE | 4 | 5 |
2545 | 0 | 0 | 375 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):217-218
HORROBIN DF PEER-REVIEW - A PHILOSOPHICALLY FAULTY CONCEPT WHICH IS PROVING DISASTROUS FOR SCIENCE | 10 | 20 |
2546 | 0 | 0 | 380 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):230-231
PALERMO DS BIASES, DECISIONS AND AUCTORIAL REBUTTAL IN THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 1 | 2 |
2547 | 0 | 0 | 383 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):235-236
ROSENTHAL R RELIABILITY AND BIAS IN PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES | 3 | 3 |
2548 | 0 | 0 | 384 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):236-237
RUBIN DB REJECTION, REBUTTAL, REVISION - SOME FLEXIBLE FEATURES OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2549 | 0 | 0 | 385 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):237-238
SCARR S ANOSMIC PEER-REVIEW - A ROSE BY ANOTHER NAME IS EVIDENTLY NOT A ROSE | 3 | 10 |
2550 | 0 | 0 | 387 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):242-243
WILSON WA RESEARCH ON PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES - PROBLEMS OF INTERPRETATION, APPLICATION, AND PROPRIETY | 1 | 5 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
2551 | 0 | 0 | 388 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):245-245
ZEAMAN D RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2552 | 0 | 0 | 390 1982 BIOSCIENCE 32(1):10-12
BODDE T EVALUATION OF PEER-REVIEW DRAWS MIXED REACTIONS | 1 | 1 |
2553 | 0 | 0 | 396 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285(6353):1501-1501
FISKEN RA PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 0 | 0 |
2554 | 0 | 0 | 401 1982 CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS 60(11):32-43
SANDERS HJ PEER-REVIEW - HOW WELL IS IT WORKING | 4 | 4 |
2555 | 0 | 0 | 402 1982 CONNECTICUT MEDICINE 46(8):463-465
[Anon] PRINCIPLES FOR VOLUNTARY MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW - AN INTERIM-REPORT | 0 | 0 |
2556 | 0 | 0 | 403 1982 CONNECTICUT MEDICINE 46(11):651-656
SUBER DG PEER-REVIEW - A LEGAL UPDATE - WITH A SUMMARY OF STATE LAWS ON IMMUNITY | 0 | 0 |
2557 | 0 | 0 | 405 1982 HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY 33(10):803-803
GUILLETTE W EFFECTIVENESS OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2558 | 0 | 0 | 406 1982 HOSPITALS 56(9):28-&
[Anon] AHA PROPOSES LOCAL PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2559 | 0 | 0 | 407 1982 JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY 153(6):30-32
MANN A 4TH ANNUAL PCP CONFERENCE - PEER-REVIEW, AUDITS, STANDARDS OVERLOAD AND TAX DIVISION DISCUSSED | 0 | 0 |
2560 | 0 | 0 | 409 1982 JOURNAL OF RESEARCH COMMUNICATION STUDIES 3(4):327-334
HORROBIN DF PEER-REVIEW - IS THE GOOD THE ENEMY OF THE BEST | 0 | 1 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
2561 | 0 | 0 | 410 1982 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 180(2):130-130
RELMAN AS PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2562 | 0 | 0 | 413 1982 MINNESOTA MEDICINE 65(12):759-760
HANDLER S IS PEER-REVIEW EFFECTIVE | 0 | 0 |
2563 | 0 | 0 | 414 1982 PENNSYLVANIA MEDICINE 85(11):18-18
JONES KB ANTITRUST IMPLICATIONS OF PEER-REVIEW OF FEES .2. | 0 | 0 |
2564 | 0 | 0 | 419 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13(1):4-4
BARCLAY AG SPECIAL ISSUE - PEER-REVIEW AND QUALITY ASSURANCE - FOREWORD | 0 | 0 |
2565 | 0 | 0 | 420 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13(1):5-8
STRICKER G; CLAIBORN WL; BENT RJ PEER-REVIEW - AN OVERVIEW | 0 | 3 |
2566 | 0 | 0 | 423 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13(1):23-26
WILLENS J; DELEON PH POLITICAL ASPECTS OF PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 3 |
2567 | 0 | 0 | 429 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13(1):141-144
MORTON SI PEER-REVIEW - A VIEW FROM WITHIN | 0 | 3 |
2568 | 0 | 0 | 432 1982 PSYCHOTHERAPY-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 19(1):3-8
DALL OB; CLAIBORN WL AN EVALUATION OF THE AETNA PILOT PEER-REVIEW PROJECT | 0 | 6 |
2569 | 0 | 0 | 433 1982 SCIENCE 215(4528):11-11
CLARK AH LUCK, MERIT, AND PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 5 |
2570 | 0 | 0 | 435 1982 SCIENCE 215(4531):344-&
WESTLEY J NSF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
2571 | 0 | 0 | 436 1982 SCIENCE 215(4531):344-344
HOWER J NSF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2572 | 0 | 0 | 439 1982 SCIENCE 215(4531):346-346
KYBURG HE NSF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2573 | 0 | 0 | 443 1982 WEST VIRGINIA MEDICAL JOURNAL 78(5):126-126
[Anon] PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2574 | 0 | 0 | 447 1983 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 12(1):57-57
KROME RL PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2575 | 0 | 0 | 448 1983 ARCHIVES OF SURGERY 118(1):17-17
BAUE AE A NEW YEAR AND A NEW LOOK, BUT THE SAME PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 0 | 0 |
2576 | 0 | 0 | 456 1983 CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN 29(MAY):857-857
MCCAFFERY M PEER-REVIEW - OR SNEER REVIEW | 1 | 1 |
2577 | 0 | 0 | 457 1983 CLINICAL RESEARCH 31(5):A872-A872
DESILVA M; MIZE G; RISSING JP ANTIBIOTIC AUDIT BY PEER-REVIEW - POSITIVE IMPACT ON PHYSICIAN PRESCRIBING | 0 | 0 |
2578 | 0 | 0 | 459 1983 HOSPITALS 57(18):31-31
BLOOM MZ PRO RULES CHANGE FOCUS OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2579 | 0 | 0 | 460 1983 HOSPITALS 57(22):28-28
MICKEL C AHA, HCFA NEGOTIATE PEER-REVIEW PROGRAM | 0 | 0 |
2580 | 0 | 0 | 461 1983 INTERFACES 13(6):110-112
ROSENMAN BB MANAGING AN MS OR ACTIVITY BY PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
2581 | 0 | 0 | 463 1983 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 250(17):2305-2306
ROSEN HM; SUSSMAN EJ MAKING PEER-REVIEW MORE PRODUCTIVE | 1 | 1 |
2582 | 0 | 0 | 466 1983 JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH 62():234-234
WALDMAN HB; SHAKUN ML ATTITUDE TOWARDS PEER-REVIEW BY HEALTH PROFESSION STUDENTS | 0 | 0 |
2583 | 0 | 0 | 468 1983 JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW 8(2):293-313
HASTINGS DA LEGAL ISSUES RAISED BY PRIVATE REVIEW ACTIVITIES OF MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS | 1 | 2 |
2584 | 0 | 0 | 470 1983 JOURNAL OF NEUROBIOLOGY 14(2):95-112
OSMOND DH MALICES WONDERLAND - RESEARCH FUNDING AND PEER-REVIEW | 11 | 24 |
2585 | 0 | 0 | 472 1983 JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION 22(4):143-143
DETORNYAY R WHY PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2586 | 0 | 0 | 477 1983 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION 106(4):520-522
[Anon] SURVEY OF CONSTITUENT DENTAL SOCIETIES PEER-REVIEW SYSTEMS - ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION | 0 | 0 |
2587 | 0 | 0 | 478 1983 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 182(9):886-886
LUNDBERG GD PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2588 | 0 | 0 | 484 1983 PHYSICAL THERAPY 63(5):781-781
SIMPSON DW; FORD LA IMPROVING PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSISTANT PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2589 | 0 | 0 | 490 1983 SCIENCE 222(4628):1079-1079
FRIEDL E BYPASSING PEER-REVIEW FOR SCIENTIFIC FACILITIES | 0 | 1 |
2590 | 0 | 0 | 495 1983 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 64(11):373-374
[Anon] THE MEDICAL-ASSOCIATION AND PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
2591 | 0 | 0 | 497 1983 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 64(21):807-807
PRINSLOO JC PEER-REVIEW - ARE WE HANGING THE RIGHT MAN - COMMENTS | 0 | 0 |
2592 | 0 | 0 | 498 1983 WELDING JOURNAL 62(1):13-13
NIPPES EF; STOUT RD THE JOURNAL ADOPTS PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2593 | 0 | 0 | 499 1984 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 187(APR):12-CINF
VASTA BM; KISSMAN HM TOXICOLOGY DATA-BANK (TDB) - PEER-REVIEW AUGMENTATION VIA COMPUTER CONFERENCING | 0 | 0 |
2594 | 0 | 0 | 506 1984 CIVIL ENGINEERING 54(2):46-49
DOUGHERTY WL PEER-REVIEW - A MANAGEMENT TOOL FOR PUBLIC-SECTOR PROJECTS | 0 | 0 |
2595 | 0 | 0 | 507 1984 CONSULTING ENGINEER 62(1):24-&
WILLIS SK PEER-REVIEW SEEKS TO IMPROVE QUALITY | 0 | 0 |
2596 | 0 | 0 | 509 1984 ENGINEERING NEWS-RECORD 212(9):61-61
[Anon] A-ES TO GET PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
2597 | 0 | 0 | 510 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 18(12):A353-A353
FLEMING JL PEER-REVIEW - A MATTER OF EXPECTATIONS | 0 | 0 |
2598 | 0 | 0 | 511 1984 HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW 62(6):58-&
OLSON FC HOW PEER-REVIEW WORKS AT CONTROL DATA | 0 | 0 |
2599 | 0 | 0 | 513 1984 HOSPITALS 58(1):30-30
MICKEL C PEER-REVIEW LAGS - POLICY QUESTIONS RAISED | 0 | 0 |
2600 | 0 | 0 | 521 1984 NATURE 309(5968):494-495
[Anon] THE NETHERLANDS - SHADOW BOXING WITH PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
Page 26: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
Generated by:
HistCite(Vlad).
Version: 2004.05.14