| Missing Links? Citation Matrix | Graphs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
|
LOCK S, 1985, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED, ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66 INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686 CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE, BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231 COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC, |
Nodes: 3294
Authors: 5593,
Journals: 1065,
Outer References: 36825
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by LCR.
Page 1: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 48 | 195 | 1589 1995 ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 30():213-250
Dalton MS Refereeing of scholarly works for primary publishing | 1 | 4 |
| 2 | 33 | 181 | 2237 1998 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 19(3):181-211
Campanario JM Peer review for journals as it stands today - Part 1 | 4 | 10 |
| 3 | 32 | 318 | 2256 1998 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW 59(3):677-717
Noah L Sanctifying scientific peer review: Publication as a proxy for regulatory decisionmaking | 0 | 7 |
| 4 | 31 | 37 | 1634 1995 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS 76():217-221
MICHELS R PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 4 |
| 5 | 30 | 106 | 3055 2003 ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION 8(1):75-96
Hojat M; Gonnella JS; Caelleigh AS Impartial judgment by the "gatekeepers" of science: Fallibility and accountability in the peer review process | 0 | 2 |
| 6 | 27 | 150 | 2238 1998 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 19(4):277-306
Campanario JM Peer review for journals as it stands today - Part 2 | 4 | 8 |
| 7 | 24 | 42 | 2642 2001 ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE 21(5-6):275-282
El-Munshid HA Evaluation of peer review in biomedical publication | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 24 | 39 | 2928 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2786-2790
Jefferson T; Wager E; Davidoff F Measuring the quality of editorial peer review | 5 | 9 |
| 9 | 22 | 41 | 2763 2001 PHARMACOTHERAPY 21(4):395-404
Sylvia LM; Herbel JL Manuscript peer review - A guide for health care professionals | 1 | 1 |
| 10 | 20 | 182 | 1038 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):119-134
CICCHETTI DV THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY INVESTIGATION | 35 | 80 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 11 | 20 | 27 | 2927 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2784-2786
Jefferson T; Alderson P; Wager E; Davidoff F Effects of editorial peer review - A systematic review | 8 | 11 |
| 12 | 18 | 37 | 1857 1996 PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE 26(5):883-886
Wessely S What do we know about peer review? | 3 | 6 |
| 13 | 18 | 28 | 2464 2000 BRAIN 123():1964-1969
Rothwell PM; Martyn CN Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience - Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? | 14 | 21 |
| 14 | 17 | 33 | 2140 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):214-215
Rennie D Peer review in Prague | 6 | 11 |
| 15 | 17 | 47 | 2380 1999 MEDICAL HYPOTHESES 52(1):31-36
Stehbens WE Basic philosophy and concepts underlying scientific peer review | 0 | 5 |
| 16 | 17 | 63 | 3220 2003 SERIALS LIBRARIAN 45(2):39-59
Bachand RG; Sawallis PP Accuracy in the identification of scholarly and peer-reviewed journals and the peer-review process across disciplines | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 16 | 49 | 2028 1997 REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA 25(148):1946-1950
Shashok K Shared responsibility in expert reviewing of original articles | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 16 | 46 | 2193 1998 LANCET 352(9124):301-305
Wessely S Peer review of grant applications: what do we know? | 10 | 16 |
| 19 | 15 | 91 | 986 1990 LIBRARY TRENDS 39(1-2):145-167
BIGGS M THE IMPACT OF PEER-REVIEW ON INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM | 2 | 7 |
| 20 | 15 | 22 | 2682 2001 HOSPITAL MEDICINE 62(3):172-175
Paice E How to write a peer review | 0 | 5 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 21 | 14 | 28 | 504 1984 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 18(1):64-69
KOSKY R PEER-REVIEW - A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON THE AMERICAN-EXPERIENCE 1972-1982 | 1 | 1 |
| 22 | 14 | 58 | 1304 1993 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 27(2):311-318
BEATSON JA; LANCASTER JE PEER-REVIEW OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TREATMENTS IN PSYCHIATRY - A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE | 2 | 3 |
| 23 | 14 | 30 | 1667 1995 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 207(1):36-38
LEGENDRE AM PEER-REVIEW OF MANUSCRIPTS FOR BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS | 2 | 2 |
| 24 | 14 | 64 | 1872 1996 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 18(1):3-28
Dirk L From laboratory to scientific literature - The life and death of biomedical research results | 1 | 1 |
| 25 | 14 | 54 | 3061 2003 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION 82(10):790-802
Wagner AK; Boninger ML; Levy C; Chan L; Gater D; Kirby RL Issues in physical medicine and rehabilitation | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 14 | 19 | 3145 2003 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 10(5):540-542
Ludbrook J Peer review of biomedical manuscripts: an update | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 13 | 78 | 623 1986 CURRENT CONTENTS (32):3-12
GARFIELD E REFEREEING AND PEER-REVIEW .2. THE RESEARCH ON REFEREEING AND ALTERNATIVES TO THE PRESENT SYSTEM | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 13 | 36 | 1422 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):11-21
GOODMAN SN; BERLIN J; FLETCHER SW; FLETCHER RH MANUSCRIPT QUALITY BEFORE AND AFTER PEER-REVIEW AND EDITING AT ANNALS OF INTERNAL-MEDICINE | 30 | 68 |
| 29 | 13 | 23 | 2338 1999 ITALIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY 31(8):659-662
Goldbeck-Wood S Secrecy and openness in Peer Review - time for a change of culture? | 1 | 2 |
| 30 | 13 | 51 | 2349 1999 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY 21(3):412-421
Cicchetti DV Guardians of science: Fairness and reliability of peer review. | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 31 | 13 | 42 | 2670 2001 EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS 23(4):343-364
Jayasinghe UW; Marsh HW; Bond N Peer review in the funding of research in higher education: The Australian experience | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 13 | 22 | 3072 2003 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 139(12):1038-1040
Laine C; Mulrow C Peer review: Integral to science and indispensable to Annals | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 12 | 35 | 682 1987 CURRENT CONTENTS (5):3-9
GARFIELD E REFEREEING AND PEER-REVIEW .4. RESEARCH ON THE PEER-REVIEW OF GRANT PROPOSALS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 12 | 92 | 2006 1997 MEDICINA CLINICA 108(12):460-471
Guallar E; Conde J; delaCal MA; MartinMoreno JM A guide for evaluation of research projects in health sciences | 1 | 2 |
| 35 | 12 | 22 | 2084 1998 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 173():110-113
Howard L; Wilkinson G Peer review and editorial decision-making | 4 | 7 |
| 36 | 12 | 15 | 2356 1999 JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE 14(10):622-624
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review | 3 | 3 |
| 37 | 12 | 15 | 2832 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 179(6):1415-1417
Katz DS; Proto AV; Olmsted WW Incidence and nature of unblinding by authors: Our experience at two radiology journals with double-blinded peer review policies | 3 | 5 |
| 38 | 12 | 17 | 2872 2002 CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH 56(3):339-346
Opthof T; Coronel R; Janse MJ The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias | 0 | 0 |
| 39 | 12 | 20 | 2925 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2762-2765
Godlee F Making reviewers visible - Openness, accountability, and credit | 8 | 11 |
| 40 | 12 | 56 | 2971 2002 LEARNED PUBLISHING 15(4):247-258
Rowland F The peer-review process | 1 | 2 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 41 | 12 | 130 | 3141 2003 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH 56(1):69-84
Armstrong JS Discovery and communication of important marketing findings - Evidence and proposals | 0 | 2 |
| 42 | 11 | 16 | 1436 1994 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 309(6948):143-144
SMITH R PROMOTING RESEARCH INTO PEER-REVIEW | 19 | 28 |
| 43 | 11 | 47 | 1441 1994 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 150(8):1211-1216
HUSTON P INFORMATION FOR PEER REVIEWERS | 2 | 3 |
| 44 | 11 | 51 | 1686 1995 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 70(1):100-134
CHAN EJ THE BRAVE-NEW-WORLD OF DAUBERT - TRUE PEER-REVIEW, EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW, AND SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY | 2 | 7 |
| 45 | 11 | 22 | 1928 1997 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 85(4):418-422
Eldredge JD Identifying peer-reviewed journals in clinical medicine | 2 | 3 |
| 46 | 11 | 18 | 1970 1997 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 50(11):1189-1195
Hodgson C How reliable is peer review? An examination of operating grant proposals simultaneously submitted to two similar peer review systems | 1 | 2 |
| 47 | 11 | 24 | 2258 1998 ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOSOMATISCHE MEDIZIN UND PSYCHOANALYSE 44(1):88-98
Buddeberg C; Buchi S; Buddeberg-Fischer B What is an original contribution in the fields of psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy | 1 | 3 |
| 48 | 11 | 14 | 2295 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7175):4-5
Smith R Opening up BMJ peer review - A beginning that should lead to complete transparency | 16 | 23 |
| 49 | 11 | 21 | 2297 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7175):44-45
Goldbeck-Wood S Evidence on peer review - scientific quality control or smokescreen? | 10 | 14 |
| 50 | 11 | 16 | 2362 1999 JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY 90(2):364-370
Firlik KS; Firlik AD The peer-review process of the Journal of Neurosurgery | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 51 | 10 | 27 | 796 1988 PSYCHIATRIC ANNALS 18(8):487-491
ALLEN MG PSYCHIATRIC PEER-REVIEW - A CURRENT PERSPECTIVE | 0 | 0 |
| 52 | 10 | 47 | 1390 1993 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH SECTION B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES 101():359-375
LOCK S QUALITY ASSURANCE IN MEDICAL PUBLICATION | 0 | 0 |
| 53 | 10 | 19 | 1582 1995 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 165(3):685-688
POLAK JF THE ROLE OF THE MANUSCRIPT REVIEWER IN THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 5 | 7 |
| 54 | 10 | 17 | 2067 1998 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL 26(3):211-214
Larson EL Status of peer review | 0 | 1 |
| 55 | 10 | 16 | 2094 1998 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 86(3):421-422
Homan FM Whither peer review: Prague '97 | 0 | 0 |
| 56 | 10 | 18 | 2397 1999 PERFUSION 12(6):236-+
Resch KL; Ernst E Peer reviewer bias against unconventional medicine? | 0 | 0 |
| 57 | 10 | 27 | 2604 2000 SCIENTOMETRICS 47(1):11-23
Claveria LE; Guallar E; Cami J; Conde J; Pastor R; Ricoy JR; Rodriguez-Farre E; Ruiz-Palomo F; Munoz E Does peer review predict the performance of research projects in health sciences? | 0 | 0 |
| 58 | 10 | 15 | 2625 2001 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 76(9):911-914
Shea JA; Caelleigh AS; Pangaro L; Steinecke A Review process | 1 | 1 |
| 59 | 10 | 16 | 2675 2001 FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL 7(6):521-527
Melero R; Lopez-Santovena F Referees' attitudes toward open peer review and electronic transmission of papers | 0 | 0 |
| 60 | 10 | 13 | 3168 2003 JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 34(4):236-248
Ahmed HS Does peer review process exist in developing-country journals?: The Bangladesh experience | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 61 | 10 | 34 | 3173 2003 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY 166():279-300
Jayasinghe UW; Marsh HW; Bond N A multilevel cross-classified modelling approach to peer review of grant proposals: the effects of assessor and researcher attributes on assessor ratings | 0 | 0 |
| 62 | 9 | 35 | 588 1985 SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES (52):44-54
GILLESPIE GW; CHUBIN DE; KURZON GM EXPERIENCE WITH NIH PEER-REVIEW - RESEARCHERS CYNICISM AND DESIRE FOR CHANGE | 0 | 0 |
| 63 | 9 | 26 | 681 1987 CURRENT CONTENTS (4):3-8
GARFIELD E REFEREEING AND PEER-REVIEW .3. HOW THE PEER-REVIEW OF RESEARCH-GRANT PROPOSALS WORKS AND WHAT SCIENTISTS SAY ABOUT IT | 0 | 0 |
| 64 | 9 | 19 | 1081 1991 INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 12(1):11-13
HEPKER RR INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY - THE FORMAL REVIEW PROCESS | 0 | 0 |
| 65 | 9 | 26 | 1216 1992 ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 28(7):465-470
PUTTERMAN C QUOTATION ACCURACY - FACT OR FICTION | 0 | 0 |
| 66 | 9 | 32 | 1412 1993 TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY 20(1):28-32
HAAGA DAF PEER-REVIEW OF TERM PAPERS IN GRADUATE PSYCHOLOGY COURSES | 1 | 5 |
| 67 | 9 | 20 | 1443 1994 CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH 28(8):1134-1139
FABIATO A ANONYMITY OF REVIEWERS | 8 | 13 |
| 68 | 9 | 17 | 1640 1995 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 274(12):986-987
RENNIE D PEER-REVIEW IN PRAGUE - THE INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS ON BIOMEDICAL PEER-REVIEW AND GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, 1997 | 1 | 2 |
| 69 | 9 | 12 | 2143 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):234-237
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review - A randomized trial | 31 | 42 |
| 70 | 9 | 17 | 2382 1999 NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA 12(5):210-213
Das Sinha S; Sahni P; Nundy S Does exchanging comments of Indian and non-Indian reviewers improve the quality of manuscript reviews? | 2 | 2 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 71 | 9 | 13 | 2452 2000 ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND 82(4):133-135
Earnshaw JJ; Farndon JR; Guillou PJ; Johnson CD; Murie JA; Murray GD A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process | 1 | 3 |
| 72 | 9 | 23 | 2839 2002 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 40(3):313-316
Callaham ML Research into peer review and scientific publication: Journals look in the mirror | 0 | 0 |
| 73 | 9 | 57 | 3031 2002 SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 8(2):155-174
Wilson JR Responsible authorship and peer review | 0 | 0 |
| 74 | 9 | 17 | 3262 2004 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE 30(1):2-11
Wood M; Roberts M; Howell B The reliability of peer reviews of papers on information systems | 0 | 0 |
| 75 | 9 | 28 | 3283 2004 RESEARCH POLICY 33(3):443-454
Viner N; Powell P; Green R Institutionalized biases in the award of research grants: a preliminary analysis revisiting the principle of accumulative advantage | 0 | 0 |
| 76 | 8 | 18 | 505 1984 CANCER INVESTIGATION 2(4):311-320
LEVY JA PEER-REVIEW - THE CONTINUAL NEED FOR REASSESSMENT | 1 | 2 |
| 77 | 8 | 22 | 1131 1991 SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES 16(3):322-341
TRAVIS GDL; COLLINS HM NEW LIGHT ON OLD BOYS - COGNITIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL PARTICULARISM IN THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM | 5 | 13 |
| 78 | 8 | 27 | 1316 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6893):1668-1672
GILLETT R; HARROW J PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .1. MANAGEMENT WITHIN THE MEDICAL-RESEARCH-COUNCIL | 3 | 12 |
| 79 | 8 | 27 | 1317 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6893):1672-1675
GILLETT R; HARROW J PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .2. IS MEDICAL-RESEARCH WELL-SERVED BY PEER-REVIEW | 4 | 12 |
| 80 | 8 | 17 | 1354 1993 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 270(23):2856-2858
RENNIE D MORE PEERING INTO EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW | 9 | 12 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 81 | 8 | 49 | 1411 1993 STATISTICAL SCIENCE 8(3):310-317
COX D; GLESER L; PERLMAN M; REID N; ROEDER K REPORT OF THE AD-HOC-COMMITTEE-ON-DOUBLE-BLIND-REFEREEING | 2 | 4 |
| 82 | 8 | 9 | 1475 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):91-91
RENNIE D; FLANAGIN A THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION | 24 | 35 |
| 83 | 8 | 14 | 1496 1994 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION 93(5):1877-1880
SCHARSCHMIDT BF; DEAMICIS A; BACCHETTI P; HELD MJ CHANCE, CONCURRENCE, AND CLUSTERING - ANALYSIS OF REVIEWERS RECOMMENDATIONS ON 1,000 SUBMISSIONS TO THE JOURNAL-OF-CLINICAL-INVESTIGATION | 8 | 11 |
| 84 | 8 | 17 | 1941 1997 DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY 23(6):423-428
Salasche SJ How to ''peer review'' a medical journal manuscript | 1 | 1 |
| 85 | 8 | 25 | 2158 1998 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY 20(3):428-431
Cicchetti DV Good science and good peer reviewing: Are they related? | 0 | 0 |
| 86 | 8 | 15 | 2734 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(2):85-91
van Rooyen S The evaluation of peer-review quality | 1 | 1 |
| 87 | 8 | 24 | 2798 2001 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 31(6):820-841
Langfeldt L The decision-making constraints and processes of grant peer review, and their effects on the review outcome | 0 | 1 |
| 88 | 8 | 16 | 2831 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 166(8):1019-1023
Hoppin FG How I review an original scientific article | 4 | 8 |
| 89 | 8 | 27 | 2854 2002 BIOSCIENCE 52(9):824-829
Liu JG; Pysarchik DT; Taylor WW Peer review in the classroom | 0 | 0 |
| 90 | 8 | 19 | 2861 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 324(7348):1271-1273
Bacchetti P Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem | 7 | 14 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 91 | 8 | 26 | 2880 2002 CORTEX 38(3):269-271
Della Sala S; Grafman J Refereeing mortus est, vivat refereeing | 0 | 0 |
| 92 | 8 | 21 | 2915 2002 HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 37(2):483-498
Weingart SN; Davis RB; Palmer RH; Cahalane M; Hamel MB; Mukamal K; Phillips RS; Davies DT; Iezzoni LI Discrepancies between explicit and implicit review: Physician and nurse assessments of complications and quality | 0 | 3 |
| 93 | 8 | 10 | 2924 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2759-2760
Rennie D Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication | 13 | 19 |
| 94 | 8 | 22 | 3191 2003 MEDICINA CLINICA 121(18):690-694
Arnau C; Cobo E; Ribera JM; Cardellach F; Selva A; Urrutia A Effect of statistical review on manuscript quality in Medicina Clinica (Barcelona): a randomized study | 0 | 2 |
| 95 | 8 | 16 | 3213 2003 REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES 20(5):671-678
Hoppin GH How I review an original scientific paper | 0 | 0 |
| 96 | 7 | 61 | 279 1979 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 9(2):199-232
MITROFF II; CHUBIN DE PEER-REVIEW AT THE NSF - DIALECTICAL POLICY ANALYSIS | 13 | 30 |
| 97 | 7 | 22 | 392 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285(6350):1224-1226
LOCK S PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 5 | 17 |
| 98 | 7 | 29 | 500 1984 AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST 27(5):631-648
COHEN LH; STRAUSSZERBY S PEER-REVIEW OF PSYCHOTHERAPY | 1 | 2 |
| 99 | 7 | 39 | 797 1988 R & D MANAGEMENT 18(4):333-340
POURIS A PEER-REVIEW IN SCIENTIFICALLY SMALL COUNTRIES | 1 | 3 |
| 100 | 7 | 14 | 957 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1371-1376
MCNUTT RA; EVANS AT; FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON THE QUALITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL | 65 | 104 |
Page 1: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad).
Version: 2004.05.14