Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Thu Jun 24 16:14:01 2004
Papers found on a Topic Search of "Peer Review"
and papers citing Steve Lock's "A Difficult
Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine"
and these papers/books added:
LOCK S, 1985, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED,
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE,
BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231
COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC,

Nodes: 3294
Authors: 5593, Journals: 1065, Outer References: 36825
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by LCS.
Page 1:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
10 551 1985 Book 1(1):1-
Lock S
A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine
204204
2460366 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):187-195
PETERS DP; CECI SJ
PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNALS - THE FATE OF ACCEPTED, PUBLISHED ARTICLES, SUBMITTED AGAIN
74232
3714957 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1371-1376
MCNUTT RA; EVANS AT; FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON THE QUALITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
65104
406512 1971 MINERVA 9(1):66-100
ZUCKERMAN H; MERTON RK
PATTERNS OF EVALUATION IN SCIENCE - INSTITUTIONALISATION, STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF REFEREE SYSTEM
53288
525357 1981 SCIENCE 214(4523):881-886
COLE S; COLE JR; SIMON GA
CHANCE AND CONSENSUS IN PEER-REVIEW
49142
6124961 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1438-1441
HORROBIN DF
THE PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS OF PEER-REVIEW AND THE SUPPRESSION OF INNOVATION
4999
7328574 1985 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 312(10):654-657
BAILAR JC; PATTERSON K
JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW - THE NEED FOR A RESEARCH AGENDA
4363
81456 1974 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 56(5):686-692
INGELFINGER FJ
PEER REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION
4076
9201821038 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):119-134
CICCHETTI DV
THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY INVESTIGATION
3580
103391218 1992 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 267(7):958-960
GOLDMAN RL
THE RELIABILITY OF PEER ASSESSMENTS OF QUALITY OF CARE
33115
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
115141477 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):96-97
KASSIRER JP; CAMPION EW
PEER-REVIEW - CRUDE AND UNDERSTUDIED, BUT INDISPENSABLE
3350
1238631 1986 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 256(17):2391-2392
RENNIE D
GUARDING THE GUARDIANS - A CONFERENCE ON EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW
3147
13611947 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1317-1317
RENNIE D
EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION - THE 1ST-INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS
3148
149122143 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):234-237
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review - A randomized trial
3142
1513361422 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):11-21
GOODMAN SN; BERLIN J; FLETCHER SW; FLETCHER RH
MANUSCRIPT QUALITY BEFORE AND AFTER PEER-REVIEW AND EDITING AT ANNALS OF INTERNAL-MEDICINE
3068
167251482 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):143-146
FISHER M; FRIEDMAN SB; STRAUSS B
THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON ACCEPTANCE OF RESEARCH PAPERS BY PEER-REVIEW
3042
17372142 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):231-233
Black N; van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Smith R; Evans S
What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal?
3040
180 933 1990 Book 1(1):1-267
Chubin DE; Hackett EJ
Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy
2877
1917948 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1321-1322
KRONICK DA
PEER-REVIEW IN 18TH-CENTURY SCIENTIFIC JOURNALISM
2735
20262144 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):237-240
Godlee F; Gale CR; Martyn CN
Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports - A randomized controlled trial
2645
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
21262145 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):240-242
Justice AC; Cho MK; Winker MA; Berlin JA; Rennie D; PEER Investigators
Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? - A randomized controlled trial
2639
22388949 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1323-1329
BURNHAM JC
THE EVOLUTION OF EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW
2435
234211219 1992 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 267(17):2349-2354
RUBIN HR; ROGERS WH; KAHN KL; RUBENSTEIN LV; BROOK RH
WATCHING THE DOCTOR-WATCHERS - HOW WELL DO PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATION METHODS DETECT HOSPITAL-CARE QUALITY PROBLEMS
2498
24891475 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):91-91
RENNIE D; FLANAGIN A
THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION
2435
255112296 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7175):23-27
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Black N; Smith R
Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial
2227
26110894 1989 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 321(12):827-829
RELMAN AS; ANGELL M
HOW GOOD IS PEER-REVIEW
2139
270 210 1978 Book 1(1):1-
Cole S
Peer review in the National Science Foundation: phase one of a study: prepared for the Committee on Science and Public Policy of the National Academy of Sciences
2053
28120955 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1355-1357
GARDNER MJ; BOND J
AN EXPLORATORY-STUDY OF STATISTICAL ASSESSMENT OF PAPERS PUBLISHED IN THE BRITISH-MEDICAL-JOURNAL
1960
2911161436 1994 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 309(6948):143-144
SMITH R
PROMOTING RESEARCH INTO PEER-REVIEW
1928
302142009 1997 NATURE 387(6631):341-343
Wenneras C; Wold A
Nepotism and sexism in peer-review
1997
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
3118952 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1344-1347
WELLER AC
EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN UNITED-STATES MEDICAL JOURNALS
1832
32031126 1991 RADIOLOGY 178(3):637-642
SIEGELMAN SS
ASSASSINS AND ZEALOTS - VARIATIONS IN PEER-REVIEW - SPECIAL REPORT
1826
3319951 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1338-1340
YANKAUER A
WHO ARE THE PEER REVIEWERS AND HOW MUCH DO THEY REVIEW
1727
3444956 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1369-1371
GARFUNKEL JM; ULSHEN MH; HAMRICK HJ; LAWSON EE
PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED BY SECONDARY REVIEW OF ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPTS
1728
351401095 1991 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 44(1):91-98
OXMAN AD; GUYATT GH; SINGER J; GOLDSMITH CH; HUTCHISON BG; MILNER RA; STREINER DL
AGREEMENT AMONG REVIEWERS OF REVIEW ARTICLES
1764
364221296 1993 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 118(7):550-556
HAYWARD RA; MCMAHON LF; BERNARD AM
EVALUATING THE CARE OF GENERAL MEDICINE INPATIENTS - HOW GOOD IS IMPLICIT REVIEW
1749
37312959 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1390-1391
SHARP DW
WHAT CAN AND SHOULD BE DONE TO REDUCE PUBLICATION BIAS - THE PERSPECTIVE OF AN EDITOR
1630
38051483 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):147-149
LABAND DN; PIETTE MJ
A CITATION ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF BLINDED PEER-REVIEW
1623
3911142295 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7175):4-5
Smith R
Opening up BMJ peer review - A beginning that should lead to complete transparency
1623
4001244 1973 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 288(25):1323-1329
BROOK RH; APPEL FA
QUALITY-OF-CARE ASSESSMENT - CHOOSING A METHOD FOR PEER REVIEW
15207
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
4103196 1977 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN 237(4):34-41
COLE S; RUBIN L; COLE JR
PEER REVIEW AND SUPPORT OF SCIENCE
1551
423111832 1996 LANCET 348(9040):1480-1483
Pierie JPEN; Walvoort HC; Overbeke AJPM
Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
1523
43231927 1997 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 315(7111):759-760
Smith R
Peer review: Reform or revolution?
1529
44420674 1987 CHEST 91(2):252-255
ROBIN ED; BURKE CM
PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICAL JOURNALS
1414
456141481 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):139-142
GILBERT JR; WILLIAMS ES; LUNDBERG GD
IS THERE GENDER BIAS IN JAMAS PEER-REVIEW PROCESS
1425
461171831 1996 LANCET 348(9037):1293-1295
Horrobin DF
Peer review of grant applications: A harbinger for mediocrity in clinical research?
1424
4718282464 2000 BRAIN 123():1964-1969
Rothwell PM; Martyn CN
Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience - Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?
1421
48761279 1979 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 9(2):199-232
MITROFF II; CHUBIN DE
PEER-REVIEW AT THE NSF - DIALECTICAL POLICY ANALYSIS
1330
498102924 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2759-2760
Rennie D
Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication
1319
50352146 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):243-245
Cho MK; Justice AC; Winker MA; Berlin JA; Waeckerle JF; Callaham ML; Rennie D; PEER Investigators
Masking author identity in peer review - What factors influence masking success?
1219
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
5100470 1983 JOURNAL OF NEUROBIOLOGY 14(2):95-112
OSMOND DH
MALICES WONDERLAND - RESEARCH FUNDING AND PEER-REVIEW
1124
52015954 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1353-1354
EVANS JT; NADJARI HI; BURCHELL SA
QUOTATIONAL AND REFERENCE ACCURACY IN SURGICAL JOURNALS - A CONTINUING PEER-REVIEW PROBLEM
1160
534142350 1999 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 52(7):625-629
van Rooyen S; Black N; Godlee F
Development of the Review Quality Instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts
1116
5400375 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):217-218
HORROBIN DF
PEER-REVIEW - A PHILOSOPHICALLY FAULTY CONCEPT WHICH IS PROVING DISASTROUS FOR SCIENCE
1020
55177579 1985 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 313(18):1131-1137
DANS PE; WEINER JP; OTTER SE
PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS - PROMISES AND POTENTIAL PITFALLS
1046
56427756 1988 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 296(6624):774-777
SMITH R
RESEARCH POLICY - PROBLEMS WITH PEER-REVIEW AND ALTERNATIVES
1017
57011353 1993 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 270(23):2775-&
COTTON P
FLAWS DOCUMENTED, REFORMS DEBATED AT CONGRESS ON JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW
1010
585311476 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):92-94
JUDSON HF
STRUCTURAL TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE SCIENCES AND THE END OF PEER-REVIEW
1021
596102074 1998 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 128(1):66-68
Davidoff F
Masking, blinding, and peer review: The blind leading the blinded
1015
60472139 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):213-213
Rennie D; Flanagin A
Congress on Biomedical Peer Review - History, ethics, and plans for the future
1024
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
6116462193 1998 LANCET 352(9124):301-305
Wessely S
Peer review of grant applications: what do we know?
1016
6211212297 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7175):44-45
Goldbeck-Wood S
Evidence on peer review - scientific quality control or smokescreen?
1014
63253260 1979 MEDICAL CARE 17(3):1-73
HULKA BS; ROMM FJ; PARKERSON GR; RUSSELL IT; CLAPP NE; JOHNSON FS
PEER REVIEW IN AMBULATORY CARE - USE OF EXPLICIT CRITERIA AND IMPLICIT JUDGMENTS
959
6449764 1988 DRUG INTELLIGENCE & CLINICAL PHARMACY 22(7-8):601-602
CLEARY JD; ALEXANDER B
BLIND VERSUS NONBLIND REVIEW - SURVEY OF SELECTED MEDICAL JOURNALS
913
65020871 1989 JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION 57(2):151-169
MARSH HW; BALL S
THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS USED TO EVALUATE MANUSCRIPTS SUBMITTED TO ACADEMIC JOURNALS - INTERJUDGMENTAL RELIABILITY
916
66315950 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1330-1332
KNOLL E
THE COMMUNITIES OF SCIENTISTS AND JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW
912
67001040 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):137-137
BAILAR JC
RELIABILITY, FAIRNESS, OBJECTIVITY, AND OTHER INAPPROPRIATE GOALS IN PEER-REVIEW
911
682631057 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):167-186
CICCHETTI DV
REFLECTIONS FROM THE PEER-REVIEW MIRROR
911
698171354 1993 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 270(23):2856-2858
RENNIE D
MORE PEERING INTO EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW
912
701141479 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):119-121
ROBERTS JC; FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
EFFECTS OF PEER-REVIEW AND EDITING ON THE READABILITY OF ARTICLES PUBLISHED IN ANNALS OF INTERNAL-MEDICINE
926
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
71691484 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):152-153
SWEITZER BJ; CULLEN DJ
HOW WELL DOES A JOURNALS PEER-REVIEW PROCESS FUNCTION - A SURVEY OF AUTHORS OPINIONS
911
721261487 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):158-162
SCHERER RW; DICKERSIN K; LANGENBERG P
FULL PUBLICATION OF RESULTS INITIALLY PRESENTED IN ABSTRACTS - A METAANALYSIS
996
73222086 1998 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 316(7125):86-86
Goldbeck-Wood S
What makes a good reviewer of manuscripts? The BMJ invites you to join its peer review process
916
74112399 1982 BULLETIN OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY 2(5):405-422
ROY R
PEER-REVIEW OF PROPOSALS - RATIONALE, PRACTICE AND PERFORMANCE
815
75212605 1986 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 105(2):313-320
GARFIELD E
WHICH MEDICAL JOURNALS HAVE THE GREATEST IMPACT
879
76441669 1987 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW 52(5):631-642
BAKANIC V; MCPHAIL C; SIMON RJ
THE MANUSCRIPT REVIEW AND DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
833
77081172 1992 ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY 3(3):187-191
DEBELLEFEUILLE C; MORRISON CA; TANNOCK IF
THE FATE OF ABSTRACTS SUBMITTED TO A CANCER MEETING - FACTORS WHICH INFLUENCE PRESENTATION AND SUBSEQUENT PUBLICATION
835
781271293 1993 ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION IN ENGLISH 32(2):234-238
DANIEL HD
AN EVALUATION OF THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS AT ANGEWANDTE-CHEMIE
88
799201443 1994 CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH 28(8):1134-1139
FABIATO A
ANONYMITY OF REVIEWERS
813
805671452 1994 EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 17(1):3-21
GOLDMAN RL
THE RELIABILITY OF PEER ASSESSMENTS - A METAANALYSIS
812
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
812151478 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):105-107
ABBY M; MASSEY MD; GALANDIUK S; POLK HC
PEER-REVIEW IS AN EFFECTIVE SCREENING PROCESS TO EVALUATE MEDICAL MANUSCRIPTS
817
82191485 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):154-156
SCHULMAN K; SULMASY DP; RONEY D
ETHICS, ECONOMICS, AND THE PUBLICATION POLICIES OF MAJOR MEDICAL JOURNALS
823
83021486 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):156-158
COLAIANNI LA
PEER-REVIEW IN JOURNALS INDEXED IN INDEX-MEDICUS
812
848141496 1994 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION 93(5):1877-1880
SCHARSCHMIDT BF; DEAMICIS A; BACCHETTI P; HELD MJ
CHANCE, CONCURRENCE, AND CLUSTERING - ANALYSIS OF REVIEWERS RECOMMENDATIONS ON 1,000 SUBMISSIONS TO THE JOURNAL-OF-CLINICAL-INVESTIGATION
811
85001655 1995 JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE 10(8):443-450
WILKES MS; KRAVITZ RL
POLICIES, PRACTICES, AND ATTITUDES OF NORTH-AMERICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL EDITORS
823
8612202925 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2762-2765
Godlee F
Making reviewers visible - Openness, accountability, and credit
811
8720272927 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2784-2786
Jefferson T; Alderson P; Wager E; Davidoff F
Effects of editorial peer review - A systematic review
811
8808274 1979 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 10(4):631-639
CLAIBORN WL; STRICKER G
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS, PEER-REVIEW, AND CHAMPUS
711
89110336 1981 JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY 49(4):583-589
COHEN LH; OYSTERNELSON CK
CLINICIANS EVALUATIONS OF PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY - EXPERIMENTAL-DATA ON PSYCHOLOGICAL PEER-REVIEW
716
9000531 1984 SCIENCE 226(4681):1401-1401
CULLITON BJ
FINE-TUNING PEER-REVIEW
78
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
91641701 1987 JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY 2(2):165-176
MAHONEY MJ
SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION AND KNOWLEDGE POLITICS
728
92216953 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1348-1352
HARGENS LL
VARIATION IN JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW SYSTEMS - POSSIBLE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
717
93001021 1990 WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 153(5):520-522
RELMAN AS
PEER-REVIEW IN SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS - WHAT GOOD IS IT
711
94031372 1993 NATURE 363(6427):296-296
ERNST E; SARADETH T; RESCH KL
DRAWBACKS OF PEER-REVIEW
718
957241423 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):60-61
LOCK S
DOES EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW WORK
711
963191506 1994 JOURNAL OF LABORATORY AND CLINICAL MEDICINE 124(2):178-182
ERNST E; RESCH KL
REVIEWER BIAS - A BLINDED EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY
712
97131856 1996 PREVENTIVE MEDICINE 25(2):102-104
Frank E
Editors' requests of peer reviewers: A study and a proposal
77
984201966 1997 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 278(19):1573-1578
Smith MA; Atherly AJ; Kane RL; Pacala JT
Peer review of the quality of care - Reliability and sources of variability for outcome and process assessments
724
993132073 1998 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 32(3):318-322
Callaham ML; Wears RL; Waeckerle JF
Effect of attendance at a training session on peer reviewer quality and performance
77
1003172147 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):257-259
Weber EJ; Callaham ML; Wears RL; Barton C; Young G
Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting - Why investigators fail to publish
735

Page 1:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14