Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Thu Jun 24 16:13:47 2004
Papers found on a Topic Search of "Peer Review"
and papers citing Steve Lock's "A Difficult
Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine"
and these papers/books added:
LOCK S, 1985, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED,
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE,
BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231
COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC,

Nodes: 3294
Authors: 5593, Journals: 1065, Outer References: 36825
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by NCR.
Page 23:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2201011002 1990 SCIENCE 250(4981):620-620
HOLDEN C
PEER-REVIEW OF PEER-REVIEW
01
2202011003 1990 SCIENTIST 4(2):12-12
KRITCHEVSKY D
SENIOR SCIENTISTS COULD PLAY A KEY ROLE IN RESOLVING BIG PROBLEMS IN PEER-REVIEW
02
2203011004 1990 SCIENTIST 4(7):1-&
MERVIS J
NIH EYES UNPRECEDENTED SUPPORT OF RESEARCH IN SOVIET LABORATORY - WHAT HAPPENS WHEN AN EMINENT SOVIET SCIENTIST, BATTLING FOR REFORMS IN HIS OWN COUNTRY, MUST CONFRONT UNITED-STATES PEER-REVIEW
00
2204011006 1990 SCIENTIST 4(17):12-12
KONING RE
PEER-REVIEW
00
2205011007 1990 SCIENTIST 4(18):14-14
SHIMAZU M
PEER-REVIEW
00
2206111010 1990 SOCIAL FORCES 69(2):634-634
HIGGINS AC
PEERLESS SCIENCE - PEER-REVIEW AND UNITED-STATES SCIENCE POLICY - CHUBIN,DE, HACKETT,EJ
00
2207011015 1990 SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE 31(8):911-912
MCEWAN PJM
SCIENTIFIC RACISM - REFLECTIONS ON PEER-REVIEW, SCIENCE AND IDEOLOGY - COMMENTS
02
2208011029 1991 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 115(3):219-222
SPRITZ N
OVERSIGHT OF PHYSICIANS CONDUCT BY STATE LICENSING AGENCIES - LESSONS FROM NEW-YORK ZION,LIBBY CASE
05
2209011037 1991 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 25(3):301-&
KAPLAN R
PEER-REVIEW
00
2210111047 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):149-149
GREENE R
IS THERE AN ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2211011056 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):166-166
ZENTALL TR
WHAT TO DO ABOUT PEER-REVIEW - IS THE CURE WORSE THAN THE DISEASE
11
2212111064 1991 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 302(6784):1038-1038
SMITH T; SMITH R
LOCK,STEPHEN RETIRES
00
2213011065 1991 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 303(6800):433-433
HANCOCKS S
AUDIT AND PEER-REVIEW FOR DENTISTS
00
2214111070 1991 CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY-A JOURNAL OF REVIEWS 20(4):603-605
COLE S
PEERLESS SCIENCE - PEER-REVIEW AND UNITED-STATES SCIENCE POLICY - CHUBIN,DE, HACKETT,EJ
00
2215011075 1991 FASEB JOURNAL 5(1):116-116
RAUB WF
AGE-DISCRIMINATION IN NIH PEER-REVIEW
00
2216111085 1991 ISIS 82(314):711-712
OVERMANN RJ
PEERLESS SCIENCE - PEER-REVIEW AND UNITED-STATES SCIENCE POLICY - CHUBIN,DE, HACKETT,EJ
00
2217011115 1991 NEW SCIENTIST 129(1755):3-3
BODEN M
PEER-REVIEW
00
2218111129 1991 SCIENCE 251(4990):211-213
BLUME SS
PEERLESS SCIENCE - PEER-REVIEW AND UNITED-STATES SCIENCE POLICY - CHUBIN,DE, HACKETT,EJ
00
2219011130 1991 SCIENCE 254(5028):11-11
GREENBERG BR
PEER-REVIEW AND PATENT RIGHTS
00
2220011155 1992 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ENOLOGY AND VITICULTURE 43(3):294-295
BARTOLUCCI R
PHILOSOPHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN CONVERTING TO ORGANIC VINEYARD PRODUCTION
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2221011156 1992 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ENOLOGY AND VITICULTURE 43(3):296-298
INGELS C
SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND GRAPE PRODUCTION
00
2222011191 1992 CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS 70(44):2-2
BRESLOW R
IMPROVING PEER-REVIEW
00
2223111206 1992 FASEB JOURNAL 6(7):2384-2385
KHAN MA; WORTHAM JW; WATZMAN N; GREEN JG
THE NATIONAL-INSTITUTES-OF-HEALTH IS GOING HIGH-TECH IN PEER-REVIEW
00
2224011211 1992 INTERCHANGE 23(1-2):11-18
HUSEN T
THE APPLICABILITY OF DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES AND THE MISSION OF THE UNIVERSITY
00
2225011226 1992 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 7(3):237-239
SHIELDS WD
PEER-REVIEW OF EXPERT MEDICAL-LEGAL TESTIMONY - A PROPOSAL FOR CHILD NEUROLOGY
411
2226111229 1992 JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION 63(3):343-344
HACKERMAN N
PEERLESS SCIENCE - PEER-REVIEW AND UNITED-STATES SCIENCE POLICY - CHUBIN,DE, HACKETT,EJ
00
2227011232 1992 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 18(3):160-160
MORAN G
ETHICAL QUESTIONS ABOUT PEER-REVIEW
00
2228011233 1992 JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY 19():16-19
KOOPMAN WJ
EXPRESSING OUR INNER THOUGHTS - HOW TO ORGANIZE AND WRITE A CLINICAL RESEARCH-PROJECT GRANT APPLICATION
00
2229011239 1992 LIBRARY QUARTERLY 62(3):359-360
SWEETLAND JH
PEER-REVIEW IN SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING - PAPERS FROM THE 1ST-INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS-ON-PEER-REVIEW-IN-BIOMEDICAL-PUBLICATION
00
2230011247 1992 NATURE 355(6360):488-488
GEE H
UK SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY - PEERS SLAM PEER-REVIEW
02
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2231011249 1992 NATURE 357(6377):354-354
STARR C
IS PEER-REVIEW UNBIASED
00
2232011251 1992 NATURE 358(6385):364-364
NEGUS JA
PEER-REVIEW
00
2233011264 1992 SCIENCE 256(5059):959-959
STONE R
SCIENCE FUNDING - PEER-REVIEW CATCHES CONGRESSIONAL FLAK
23
2234011267 1992 SCIENCE 258(5085):1079-1080
COHEN J
AIDS FUNDING - MICROGENESIS VACCINE TRIAL GETS A PUBLIC PEER-REVIEW
00
2235011268 1992 SCIENTIST 6(23):23-23
SEIKEN J
NSF PROGRAM ATTEMPTS TO ADDRESS CONCERNS OF PEER-REVIEW CRITICS
00
2236011275 1992 TECHNOLOGY REVIEW 95(2):7-8
MANN RW
PROBLEMS WITH PEER-REVIEW
00
2237011277 1992 TECHNOLOGY REVIEW 95(3):6-7
STRAUSS ES
PEER-REVIEW RECONSIDERED
00
2238011318 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6894):1757-1757
REES DA
MEDICAL-RESEARCH-COUNCIL DEFENDS PEER-REVIEW
15
2239011319 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 307(6896):137-137
DIXON B
THE GROSSEST FAILURES OF PEER-REVIEW
23
2240011353 1993 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 270(23):2775-&
COTTON P
FLAWS DOCUMENTED, REFORMS DEBATED AT CONGRESS ON JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW
1010
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2241011373 1993 NATURE 364(6434):183-183
BRADSHAW RH; BUBIER NE
REFORM OPTIONS FOR PEER-REVIEW
12
2242011388 1993 PHYSICS TODAY 46(6):13-&
AZBEL M
COULD COLUMBUS HAVE PASSED PEER-REVIEW
12
2243011398 1993 SCIENCE 262(5137):1193-1193
PACES V; VIKLICKY V
PEER-REVIEW IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
00
2244111401 1993 SCIENTIST 7(18):12-12
GARFIELD E
DESPITE PROBLEMS WITH PEER-REVIEW, SCIENCE PUBLISHING IS HEALTHIER THAN EVER
00
2245111414 1993 WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 158(3):309-310
MORGAN M
PEER-REVIEW AND BEASOM PRINCIPLE
00
2246111418 1994 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 168(4):365-365
MOSS G
TIME TO FIGHT PEER-REVIEW ABUSE
00
2247111438 1994 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 309(6953):538-539
POLLER DN
PROMOTING RESEARCH INTO PEER-REVIEW - IDENTIFY REFEREES INSTITUTIONS
00
2248111471 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 271(2):106-106
NORMAN GR; DAVIS DA; LAMB S; HANNA E; CAULFORD P; KAIGAS T
COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT OF PRIMARY-CARE PHYSICIANS AS PART OF A PEER-REVIEW PROGRAM (VOL 270, PG 1046, 1993)
00
2249111474 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(1):11-11
COTTON P
FLAWS DOCUMENTED, REFORMS DEBATED AT CONGRESS ON JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW (VOL 270, PG 2775, 1993)
00
2250011498 1994 JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION 44(1):52-64
HANSEN KA
PUBLICATION PEER-REVIEW - AN ANNOTATED-BIBLIOGRAPHY - SPECK,BW
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2251011517 1994 KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION 21(2):108-108
BORKO H
GUARDIANS OF SCIENCE - FAIRNESS AND RELIABILITY OF THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - DANIEL,HD
00
2252011518 1994 LEARNED PUBLISHING 7(3):207-207
NEIDLE S
GUARDIANS OF SCIENCE, FAIRNESS AND RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW - DANIEL,HD
00
2253011519 1994 LIBRARY QUARTERLY 64(4):477-478
GLOGOFF S
GUARDIANS OF SCIENCE - FAIRNESS AND RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW - DANIEL,HD
00
2254011527 1994 NATURE 369(6482):594-594
[Anon]
SCIENTISTS URGE PEER-REVIEW ON HISTORIANS
00
2255011528 1994 NATURE 370(6484):6-6
[Anon]
UK RESEARCH COUNCIL SPLITS PEER-REVIEW FROM POLICY INPUTS
00
2256011529 1994 NATURE 370(6486):170-171
GAVAGHAN H
PEER-REVIEW - NIH URGED TO STREAMLINE BIDS
00
2257011531 1994 NATURE 372(6503):209-209
GAVAGHAN H
CHANGES URGED IN NIH PEER-REVIEW PROCESS
00
2258011546 1994 SCIENCE 265(5169):170-170
GABRIEL CJ
LIFE-SCIENCES PEER-REVIEW AT NASA
00
2259011549 1994 SCIENCE 265(5174):863-863
MARSHALL E
PEER-REVIEW - CONGRESS FINDS LITTLE BIAS IN SYSTEM
11
2260111550 1994 SCIENCE 266(5187):954-954
WARREN KS
PEER-REVIEW STUDY
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2261011555 1994 SCIENTIST 8(12):1-&
HOKE F
SCIENCE IN THE COURTROOM - WHAT EVIDENCE IS ADMISSIBLE - AND WHO DECIDES - SOME SCIENTISTS SAY A SUPREME-COURT DECISION TO DEEMPHASIZE PEER-REVIEW HAS LED TO BETTER COURT SCIENCE .1.
00
2262011556 1994 SCIENTIST 8(14):13-13
ASWAD DW
PEER-REVIEW
11
2263111557 1994 SCIENTIST 8(19):13-13
BEREZIN AA
PEER-REVIEW AND ANONYMITY
00
2264111581 1995 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 164(4):1007-1009
FRIEDMAN DP
MANUSCRIPT PEER-REVIEW AT THE AJR - FACTS, FIGURES, AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT
44
2265011605 1995 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 311(7003):507-507
PITKIN RM
POPULARITY DOES NOT EQUAL PEER-REVIEW
01
2266011611 1995 CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS 73(21):26-27
DAGANI R
NEW JOURNAL FORGOES TRADITIONAL PEER-REVIEW
00
2267011612 1995 CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS 73(29):4-&
ERHAN S
SCRAPPING PEER-REVIEW
00
2268011613 1995 CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS 73(29):4-4
ROBINSON CW
SCRAPPING PEER-REVIEW
00
2269011625 1995 FASEB JOURNAL 9(13):1381-1381
JUKES TH
PEER-REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPTS
00
2270011660 1995 JOURNAL OF LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION SCIENCE 27(2):116-117
STOKER D
GUARDIANS OF SCIENCE - FAIRNESS AND RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW - DANIEL,HD
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2271011669 1995 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF LONDON 29(5):447-447
KELLY MJ
SETTING UP INTERDEPARTMENTAL PEER-REVIEW
00
2272011674 1995 KERNTECHNIK 60(2-3):75-81
TOMIC B
INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES TO IMPROVE THE METHODS OF PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND TO SUPPORT ITS APPLICATIONS
00
2273011680 1995 NATURE 374(6520):299-299
ABBOTT A
ITALY WIDENS PEER-REVIEW OF HEALTH RESEARCH
01
2274011682 1995 NATURE 376(6540):455-455
DICKSON D
MEDICAL-RESEARCH CHARITIES CAN RELY ON PEER-REVIEW
00
2275011711 1995 SCIENCE 268(5210):497-498
NOWAK R
NASA SPACE BIOLOGY PROGRAM SHOWS SIGNS OF LIFE
01
2276011712 1995 SCIENCE 270(5244):1912-1914
MARSHALL E
SUIT ALLEGES MISUSE OF PEER-REVIEW
16
2277011715 1995 SCIENTOMETRICS 32(1):91-92
BECK MT
GUARDIANS OF SCIENCE - FAIRNESS AND RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM - DANIEL,HD
00
2278111730 1995 URBAN GEOGRAPHY 16(8):655-656
Berry BJL
Peer review: Is it working?
11
2279011746 1996 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 51(11):1190-1191
Fine MA
Reflections on enhancing accountability in the peer review process
23
2280011750 1996 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 28(2):247-247
Callaham
Medical journals and the science of peer review: Raising the standard (vol 28, pg 75, 1996)
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2281111751 1996 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 125(2):148-148
Davidoff F
Currents
00
2282011759 1996 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 30(5):660-666
Robertson S; Parker G; Byrne S; Wright M
An exploration of the quality of peer review group activities within Australasia
00
2283011846 1996 NATURE 384(6609):509-509
Rumjanek FD
Paranoid about peer review?
26
2284111865 1996 SCIENCE 271(5249):583-583
Cohen J
AIDS trials take on peer review (vol 271, pg 20, 1996)
00
2285111866 1996 SCIENCE 271(5251):895-895
Cohen J
AIDS trials take on peer review (vol 271, pg 20, 1996)
00
2286011868 1996 SCIENCE 272(5266):1257-1257
Marshall E
Peer review - NIH panel urges overhaul of the rating system for grants
00
2287011871 1996 SCIENCE 274(5289):911-911
Marshall E
Peer review - Battle ends in $21 million settlement
01
2288011894 1997 ACADEME-BULLETIN OF THE AAUP 83(3):35-38
Roworth WW
Pandora's dilemma: Some reflections on peer review
01
2289011917 1997 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 182(9):330-330
Walters H
Peer review: Stifles innovation?
00
2290011943 1997 ELECTRONIC LIBRARY 15(2):125-131
Cox JE
Publishers, publishing and the Internet: How journal publishing will survive and prosper in the electronic age
04
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2291011964 1997 ISIS 88(2):362-363
Foltz F
A half century of peer review, 1946-1996 - Mandel,R
00
2292111999 1997 LANCET 349(9044):63-63
Foex BA
Peer review and grant applications
00
2293112001 1997 LANCET 349(9044):63-63
Waldron HA
Peer review and grant applications
02
2294012002 1997 LANCET 349(9065):1611-1611
Morris K
Swedish researchers reveal systematic bias in peer-review
00
2295012008 1997 NATURE 385(6614):282-282
Masood E
Nuclear waste peer review 'needs more transparency'
00
2296112013 1997 NATURE 388(6645):822-822
Grant D
Peer review is a two-way process
00
2297112014 1997 NATURE 389(6649):326-326
Breen G
Nepotism and sexism in peer-review
01
2298012035 1997 SCIENCE 276(5314):888-889
Marshall E
NIH plans peer-review overhaul
14
2299012037 1997 SCIENCE 278(5339):792-794
Stone R
Germany puts money on peer review
00
2300012041 1997 SCIENTIST 11(9):13-14
Brown KS
A winning strategy for grant applications: Focus on impact
00

Page 23:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14