Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Thu Jun 24 16:13:45 2004
Papers found on a Topic Search of "Peer Review"
and papers citing Steve Lock's "A Difficult
Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine"
and these papers/books added:
LOCK S, 1985, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED,
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE,
BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231
COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC,

Nodes: 3294
Authors: 5593, Journals: 1065, Outer References: 36825
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by NCR.
Page 20:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1901023 1970 CALIFORNIA MEDICINE 113(2):80-&
SCHAFFAR.RW; PARKE HJ
UTILIZATION AND PEER REVIEW - MEDICINES PRIVILEGE AND RESPONSIBILITY
01
1902024 1970 CALIFORNIA MEDICINE 113(6):75-&
DAIGER S
PEER REVIEW - COST CONTROL OR QUALITY CONTROL
03
19030221 1972 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND NEW DRUGS 12(10):407-&
CATHCART HR
PEER REVIEW CONTROL OF DRUG UTILIZATION IN TEACHING HOSPITALS
01
19040235 1973 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 224(6):884-885
PETERSON P
TEACHING PEER REVIEW
415
19050281 1974 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 5(1):51-58
MCMILLAN JJ
PEER REVIEW AND PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR PSYCHOLOGISTS RENDERING PERSONAL HEALTH SERVICES
08
19060295 1975 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION 50(10):976-977
HADAMARD A; FINK S; DAUM SW; MICHEL RD
NEW TOOL FOR PROGRAM-EVALUATION - CONSULTANT PEER REVIEW
02
190702108 1975 SCIENCE 189(4201):435-437
WALSH J
NSF PEER REVIEW HEARINGS - HOUSE PANEL STARTS WITH CRITICS
07
190802192 1977 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 296(21):1230-1231
ENGEBRETSEN B
PEER REVIEW IN GRADUATE-EDUCATION
47
190902202 1978 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY 32(2):118-118
OSTROW PC
SUBJECTIVE-OBJECTIVE PEER REVIEW PROCEDURES
00
191002209 1978 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 1(6115):769-770
KNIGHT J
LETTER FROM ... VICTORIA - PEER REVIEW
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
191102222 1978 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE 29(5):260-260
KOCHEN M
WRITING QUALITY AND PEER REVIEW
00
191202230 1979 AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL 97(2):265-266
BURCH GE
PEER REVIEW
11
191302236 1979 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGIST 14(4):215-218
HILLER DV; DILLINGHAM HC
IMPACT OF RIGHT-OF-ACCESS UPON PEER-REVIEW - EDITORIAL ESSAY
00
191402259 1979 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY 18(2):391-400
STEVENSON K; MACKEY W; TUCKER L
CHILD-PSYCHIATRY PERSPECTIVES - PROBLEMS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF PEER-REVIEW IN CHILD-PSYCHIATRY
01
191502360 1981 SCIENCE 214(4527):1294-1294
CRONBACH LJ
THE PEER-REVIEW QUESTION
00
191612369 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):203-204
BLISSETT M
PEER-REVIEW AND THE STRUCTURE OF KNOWLEDGE
00
191702394 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285(6353):1501-1501
MOFFAT DB
PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE
00
191802395 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285(6353):1501-1501
COTES JE
PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE
00
191902427 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13(1):105-111
LASSEN CL
THE COLORADO MEDICARE STUDY - PERSPECTIVE OF THE PEER-REVIEW COMMITTEE
02
192012444 1983 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 74(3):494-495
DIXON GF; SCHONFELD SA; ALTMAN M; WHITCOMB ME
THE PEER-REVIEW AND EDITORIAL PROCESS - A LIMITED EVALUATION
11
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
192122449 1983 BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY 70(11):697-697
NEGUS D
PEER-REVIEW - SHOULD IT BE BLIND
00
192212475 1983 JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY 10(3):358-359
MCDUFFIE FC
SHORT CUTS FOR PEER-REVIEW
00
192302493 1983 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 64(3):80-80
VANRENSBURG LJ
PEER-REVIEW
00
192422494 1983 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 64(7):226-227
[Anon]
IDEAS ABOUT PEER-REVIEW
00
192502496 1983 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 64(21):807-807
MAARTENS R
PEER-REVIEW - ARE WE HANGING THE RIGHT MAN
00
192602508 1984 EMPLOYEE RELATIONS LAW JOURNAL 9(4):659-671
COOMBE JD
PEER-REVIEW - THE EMERGING SUCCESSFUL APPLICATION
15
192702515 1984 JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY 157(1):88-&
SAXLEHNER AC; HURDMAN M
PEER-REVIEW - THE FOUNDATION OF SELF-REGULATION
00
192802528 1984 PHYSICS TODAY 37(11):192-192
DAVIS HL
PEER-REVIEW NEEDS MORE SUPPORT FROM CONGRESS
00
192902535 1984 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 66(15):554-554
MULLER FJ
ANTIBIOTICS AND PEER-REVIEW
00
193002545 1985 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 290(6483):1743-1743
EBAN R
PEER-REVIEW AT WORK
01
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
193102548 1985 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 290(6486):1984-1984
CAMPBELL MJ
PEER-REVIEW AT WORK
01
193202557 1985 HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY 36(5):517-520
SHEPHERD GL
FORMATS FOR PEER-REVIEW OF DYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY
23
193302603 1986 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 143(11):1476-1477
SHARFSTEIN SS
PSYCHIATRIC PEER-REVIEW - PRELUDE AND PROMISE - HAMILTON,JM
00
193402610 1986 BIOSCIENCE 36(9):598-598
SPITLER AL
PORK BARREL OR PEER-REVIEW - THE WAR IN CONGRESS CONTINUES
00
193502618 1986 CHEST 89(3):323-324
SOFFER A
MEET THE PRESS - AND IGNORE PEER-REVIEW
00
193602675 1987 CHEST 92(5):958-958
VEVAINA JR
RISK-BENEFITS OF PEER-REVIEW
11
193702699 1987 JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION 17(11):34-38
DAVIS SE
A PROFESSIONAL RECOGNITION SYSTEM USING PEER-REVIEW
01
193802706 1987 M D COMPUTING 4(4):6-7
MCDONALD CJ
PEER-REVIEW AND MD COMPUTING
02
193902721 1987 PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS 60(3):1049-1050
MCINTOSH EG; ROSS S
PEER-REVIEW IN PSYCHOLOGY - INSTITUTIONAL RANKING AS A FACTOR
01
194002725 1987 SCIENCE 238(4826):448-448
KINNEY TB
PEER-REVIEW AT THE AGRICULTURAL-RESEARCH-SERVICE
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
194112730 1987 SCIENTIST 1(12):10-10
WOLMAN M
CAN PEER-REVIEW BE IMPROVED
11
194212765 1988 DRUG INTELLIGENCE & CLINICAL PHARMACY 22(12):1006-1006
SHAUGHNESSY AF
BLIND PEER-REVIEW OF JOURNAL ARTICLES - COMMENT
12
194312774 1988 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 260(12):1761-1761
WILLIAMS E
THE PROCESS OF PEER-REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPTS
12
194402790 1988 LANCET 1(8585):596-596
DOUGLASWILSON I
PEER-REVIEW AND THE LANCET
00
194502800 1988 SCHWEIZERISCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT 118(8):255-256
[Anon]
ON OUR OWN BEHALF - SAFEGUARDING QUALITY OF MEDICAL-JOURNALS THROUGH PEER-REVIEW
00
194602810 1988 SCIENTIST 2(18):12-12
GIBSON WC
PERILS OF PEER-REVIEW
00
194712829 1989 ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY 125(7):1001-1002
ALLEN AD
SPEAKING OF PEER-REVIEW ...
00
194802832 1989 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 298(6688):1645-1645
BROOKS T
PEER-REVIEW FOR HOSPITALS
00
194912861 1989 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 262(14):1950-1951
MERRY MD
THE DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE EXTERNAL CIVILIAN PEER-REVIEW OF MEDICAL-CARE
00
195002862 1989 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 262(14):1951-1951
TORMA MJ
THE DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE EXTERNAL CIVILIAN PEER-REVIEW OF MEDICAL-CARE
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
195102864 1989 JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY 167(4):96-&
EVERS CJ; PEARSON DB
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PEER-REVIEW
00
195202872 1989 JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR 30(3):R4-R5
[Anon]
PEER-REVIEW ALWAYS HELPS BUT NEVER CURES
00
195302884 1989 NATURE 340(6230):173-173
ANDERSON A
PLAGIARISM CHARGE CASTS SHADOW ON PEER-REVIEW
03
195402890 1989 NATURE 341(6240):275-275
VISVANATHAN KV
PEER-REVIEW
00
195502895 1989 NEW SCIENTIST 123(1674):24-24
GAVAGHAN H
POACHED PAPER CHALLENGES PEER-REVIEW PROCESS
00
195612906 1989 SCIENTIST 3(6):9-&
HERXHEIMER A
MAKE SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS MORE RESPONSIVE - AND RESPONSIBLE
15
195702907 1989 SCIENTIST 3(7):1-&
LIVERSIDGE A
PNAS PUBLICATION OF AIDS ARTICLE SPURS DEBATE OVER PEER-REVIEW - IS THE NATIONAL ACADEMY TO BE PRAISED OR CHASTENED FOR DISSEMINATING THE VIEWS OF CONTROVERSIAL SCIENTIST DUESBERG,PETER
00
195802908 1989 SCIENTIST 3(16):13-13
FORSDYKE DR
PEER-REVIEW POLICY
11
195902915 1989 TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES 14(6):213-213
MADDOX J
PEER-REVIEW AND PUBLISHING
00
196022943 1990 CURRENT SCIENCE 59(10):492-492
PANDALAI KAV
PEER-REVIEW - REPLY
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
196122981 1990 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY 1(2):125-126
GRANTHAM JJ
PEER-REVIEW OF MANUSCRIPTS - RIGHT AND RESPONSIBILITY
01
196202984 1990 LABOR LAW JOURNAL 41(6):364-369
ROBINSON RK; FRANKLIN GM; ALLEN BM
UNIVERSITY-OF-PENNSYLVANIA V EEOC - THE DEMISE OF ACADEMIC-FREEDOM PRIVILEGE IN THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS
11
196312988 1990 MAGNESIUM AND TRACE ELEMENTS 9(3):117-118
ALTURA BT
IS ANONYMOUS PEER-REVIEW THE BEST WAY TO REVIEW AND ACCEPT MANUSCRIPTS
00
196402990 1990 NATURE 347(6292):418-418
CALNE R
MRC AND PEER-REVIEW
00
1965021055 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):164-164
TYRER P
CHAIRMANS ACTION - THE IMPORTANCE OF EXECUTIVE DECISIONS IN PEER-REVIEW
22
1966121096 1991 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 44(4-5):339-341
FEINSTEIN AR
CONSTRUCTION, CONSENT, AND CONDEMNATION IN RESEARCH ON PEER-REVIEW
26
1967021132 1991 SCIENTIST 5(1):6-&
MERVIS J
NIH FINE-TUNES PEER-REVIEW TO CLARIFY LONG-TERM FUNDING
00
1968021134 1991 SCIENTOMETRICS 21(2):171-179
ZHU J; MEADOWS AJ; MASON G
CITATIONS AND DEPARTMENTAL RESEARCH RATINGS
04
1969121139 1991 SERIALS LIBRARIAN 19(3-4):91-94
DANCIK BP
THE IMPORTANCE OF PEER-REVIEW
01
1970021202 1992 DIABETES CARE 15(1):54-58
OMALLEY BC
MEDICARE ADMISSION CRITERIA FOR DIABETES-MELLITUS IN FLORIDA
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1971021228 1992 JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION 48(3):336-338
DAVENPORT E
PEERLESS SCIENCE - PEER-REVIEW AND UNITED-STATES SCIENCE POLICY - CHUBIN,DE, HACKETT,EJ
00
1972021281 1992 ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EXPERIMENTELLE UND ANGEWANDTE PSYCHOLOGIE 39(1):R3-R5
DROSLER J
PEER-REVIEW AND MAJORITY-RULE
00
1973021287 1993 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 161(5):1101-1103
FRANK MS; MANN FA; GILLESPY T
QUALITY ASSURANCE - A SYSTEM THAT INTEGRATES A DIGITAL DICTATION SYSTEM WITH A COMPUTER-DATA BASE
12
1974021323 1993 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 149(7):928-928
FREI JV
PEER-REVIEW ANONYMITY
01
1975021342 1993 HASTINGS CENTER REPORT 23(5):16-19
FINS JJ
PRAXIS MAKES PERFECT
01
1976021366 1993 LANCET 342(8882):1293-1293
BRAHAMS D
PEER-REVIEW OF A LONDON HOSPITAL
00
1977021400 1993 SCIENTIST 7(17):11-&
ROY R
SCIENCE PUBLISHING IS URGENTLY IN NEED OF MAJOR REFORM
11
1978121439 1994 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 309(6953):539-539
FURNESS P
PROMOTING RESEARCH INTO PEER-REVIEW - REFEREES SHOULD PROVIDE REFERENCES
00
1979121457 1994 GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE 54(5):R3-R3
[Anon]
MAXIM OF THE UNKNOWN LISTENER
00
1980121458 1994 GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE 54(12):R3-R3
[Anon]
MULTIPLE AUTHORS - WHO IS DOING WHAT
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1981021473 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 271(22):1769-1771
WITTE MH; BORGS P; WAY DL; BERNAS M; RAMIREZ G; WITTE CL
KAPOSIS-SARCOMA, VASCULAR-PERMEABILITY, AND SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY
06
1982021486 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):156-158
COLAIANNI LA
PEER-REVIEW IN JOURNALS INDEXED IN INDEX-MEDICUS
812
1983021530 1994 NATURE 370(6486):170-171
DICKSON D
PEER-REVIEW - NIH URGED TO STREAMLINE BIDS ... AS BRITAIN SEEKS TO REASSURE DOUBTERS OVER POLICY CHANGES
00
1984221536 1994 OPHTHALMOLOGY 101(4):627-628
LICHTER PR
NO JUMP BALLS IN JOURNAL EDITING
00
1985021693 1995 OPHTHALMOLOGY 102(3):369-370
MINCKLER D
PURE PREVIEW AND PEER-REVIEW - OPHTHALMOLOGY WORLD NEWS AND OPHTHALMOLOGY
00
1986121745 1996 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 172(2):224-224
Scher KS
Making peer review statistically accountable - Reply
00
1987121749 1996 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 28(1):75-77
Waeckerle JF; Callaham ML
Medical journals and the science of peer review: Raising the standard
22
1988021779 1996 CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS 74(7):4-&
Adebodun F
Peer review reform
00
1989021844 1996 NATURE 384(6608):401-401
Henneberg M
A case for instant peer review?
02
1990021860 1996 REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH 66(4):417-421
Murray FB; Raths J
Factors in the peer review of reviews
03
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1991021870 1996 SCIENCE 273(5279):1162-1164
Marshall E
Trial set to focus on peer review
03
1992021895 1997 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 72(6):558-558
Baume P; Jones K
A study of peer-review marking reveals weaknesses
00
1993021949 1997 EQUINE VETERINARY JOURNAL 29(1):5-5
Rossdale PD
Volume 28: Continuing progress, peer review and clinical content
02
1994021953 1997 GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL 131(3):423-424
Wyss M; Booth DC
The IASPEI procedure for the evaluation of earthquake precursors
012
1995022004 1997 LEARNED PUBLISHING 10(2):157-159
Wood D
Electronic submission and peer review - An update on the ESPERE project
13
1996022005 1997 MEDICAL CARE 35(4):301-302
Neuhauser D
Peer review and the research commons - A problem of success
00
1997122023 1997 PHYSICS TODAY 50(3):102-+
Kostoff RN
Four factors and one criterion are key to improving peer review
00
1998222064 1998 ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION 19(1):S57-S61
Lightfoot JT
A different method of teaching peer review systems
00
1999022068 1998 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 170(4):1110-1111
Beall DP
Importance of peer review immunity protection in resident evaluations
00
2000222086 1998 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 316(7125):86-86
Goldbeck-Wood S
What makes a good reviewer of manuscripts? The BMJ invites you to join its peer review process
916

Page 20:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14