| Missing Links? Citation Matrix | Graphs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
|
LOCK S, 1985, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED, ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66 INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686 CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE, BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231 COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC, |
Nodes: 3294
Authors: 5593,
Journals: 1065,
Outer References: 36825
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by LCS.
Page 2: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | 6 | 11 | 2194 1998 LANCET 352(9126):441-445
Bingham CM; Higgins G; Coleman R; Van Der Weyden MB The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study | 7 | 18 |
| 102 | 5 | 8 | 2466 2000 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 176():47-51
Walsh E; Rooney M; Appleby L; Wilkinson G Open peer review: a randomised controlled trial | 7 | 11 |
| 103 | 8 | 19 | 2861 2002 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 324(7348):1271-1273
Bacchetti P Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem | 7 | 14 |
| 104 | 1 | 4 | 115 1976 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 133(8):891-895
LUFT LL; SAMPSON LM; NEWMAN DE EFFECTS OF PEER REVIEW ON OUTPATIENT PSYCHOTHERAPY - THERAPIST AND PATIENT FOLLOW-UP SURVEY | 6 | 13 |
| 105 | 0 | 0 | 250 1979 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 38(13):2649-2650
APIRION D RESEARCH FUNDING AND THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM | 6 | 9 |
| 106 | 1 | 8 | 389 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):246-252
PETERS DP; CECI SJ PEER-REVIEW RESEARCH - OBJECTIONS AND OBLIGATIONS | 6 | 10 |
| 107 | 1 | 8 | 751 1988 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 109(3):181-181
RENNIE D; KNOLL E INVESTIGATING PEER-REVIEW | 6 | 8 |
| 108 | 0 | 0 | 775 1988 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 260(18):2690-2693
MAYER W; CLINTON JJ; NEWHALL D A 1ST REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EXTERNAL CIVILIAN PEER-REVIEW OF MEDICAL-CARE | 6 | 9 |
| 109 | 2 | 33 | 1141 1991 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 21(1):111-132
ABRAMS PA THE PREDICTIVE ABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW OF GRANT PROPOSALS - THE CASE OF ECOLOGY AND THE UNITED-STATES-NATIONAL-SCIENCE-FOUNDATION | 6 | 9 |
| 110 | 3 | 20 | 1168 1992 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 116(11):912-919
WILKES MS; DOBLIN BH; SHAPIRO MF PHARMACEUTICAL ADVERTISEMENTS IN LEADING MEDICAL JOURNALS - EXPERTS ASSESSMENTS | 6 | 116 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 111 | 3 | 5 | 1480 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):137-138
GARFUNKEL JM; ULSHEN MH; HAMRICK HJ; LAWSON EE EFFECT OF INSTITUTIONAL PRESTIGE ON REVIEWERS RECOMMENDATIONS AND EDITORIAL DECISIONS | 6 | 13 |
| 112 | 3 | 32 | 1829 1996 LANCET 347(9012):1382-1386
Altman LK The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review .1. | 6 | 35 |
| 113 | 0 | 0 | 1965 1997 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 278(17):1389-1391
Stephenson J Medical journals turn gaze inward to examine process of peer review | 6 | 8 |
| 114 | 17 | 33 | 2140 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):214-215
Rennie D Peer review in Prague | 6 | 11 |
| 115 | 1 | 13 | 2149 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):275-277
Jefferson T; Smith R; Yee Y; Drummond M; Pratt M; Gale R Evaluating the BMJ guidelines for economic submissions - Prospective audit of economic submissions to BMJ and The Lancet | 6 | 29 |
| 116 | 5 | 10 | 2929 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2790-2793
Weber EJ; Katz PP; Waeckerle JF; Callahan ML Author perception of peer review - Impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction | 6 | 7 |
| 117 | 2 | 9 | 58 1974 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 131(12):1358-1362
LANGSLEY DG; LEBARON GI PEER REVIEW GUIDELINES - SURVEY OF LOCAL STANDARDS OF TREATMENT | 5 | 9 |
| 118 | 0 | 32 | 82 1974 SCIENCE 185(4155):916-921
NOBLE JH PEER REVIEW - QUALITY-CONTROL OF APPLIED SOCIAL-RESEARCH | 5 | 13 |
| 119 | 1 | 13 | 284 1980 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 70(3):222-228
HASTINGS GE; SONNEBORN R; LEE GH; VICK L; SASMOR L PEER-REVIEW CHECKLIST - REPRODUCIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF A METHOD FOR EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF AMBULATORY CARE | 5 | 12 |
| 120 | 5 | 7 | 294 1980 CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY-A JOURNAL OF REVIEWS 9(2):204-207
CHUBIN DE PEER-REVIEW IN THE NATIONAL-SCIENCE-FOUNDATION - PHASE ONE OF A STUDY - COLE,S, RUBIN,L, COLE,JR | 5 | 7 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 121 | 0 | 0 | 317 1980 SCIENCE 207(4433):822-823
STUMPF WE PEER-REVIEW | 5 | 8 |
| 122 | 3 | 5 | 347 1981 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 12(6):776-784
COHEN LH PEER-REVIEW OF PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY OF THE APA-CHAMPUS PROGRAM | 5 | 9 |
| 123 | 5 | 7 | 363 1982 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 72(3):239-240
YANKAUER A EDITORS REPORT - PEER-REVIEW AGAIN | 5 | 8 |
| 124 | 7 | 22 | 392 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285(6350):1224-1226
LOCK S PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE | 5 | 17 |
| 125 | 3 | 18 | 529 1984 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 15(1):96-108
STRICKER G; COHEN LH APA/CHAMPUS PEER-REVIEW PROJECT - IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH AND PRACTICE | 5 | 5 |
| 126 | 1 | 21 | 614 1986 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 292(6523):810-812
GARDNER MJ; MACHIN D; CAMPBELL MJ USE OF CHECK LISTS IN ASSESSING THE STATISTICAL CONTENT OF MEDICAL STUDIES | 5 | 81 |
| 127 | 1 | 1 | 958 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1376-1378
GARFUNKEL JM; LAWSON EE; HAMRICK HJ; ULSHEN MH EFFECT OF ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION ON THE AUTHORS EVALUATION OF PEER-REVIEW OF MEDICAL MANUSCRIPTS | 5 | 9 |
| 128 | 2 | 12 | 1009 1990 SCIENTOMETRICS 19(5-6):419-425
HARTMANN I; NEIDHARDT F PEER-REVIEW AT THE DEUTSCHE-FORSCHUNGSGEMEINSCHAFT | 5 | 8 |
| 129 | 1 | 27 | 1098 1991 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 44(11):1271-1278
OXMAN AD; GUYATT GH VALIDATION OF AN INDEX OF THE QUALITY OF REVIEW ARTICLES | 5 | 78 |
| 130 | 8 | 22 | 1131 1991 SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES 16(3):322-341
TRAVIS GDL; COLLINS HM NEW LIGHT ON OLD BOYS - COGNITIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL PARTICULARISM IN THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM | 5 | 13 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 131 | 0 | 12 | 1352 1993 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 270(9):1046-1051
NORMAN GR; DAVIS DA; LAMB S; HANNA E; CAULFORD P; KAIGAS T COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT OF PRIMARY-CARE PHYSICIANS AS PART OF A PEER-REVIEW PROGRAM | 5 | 39 |
| 132 | 10 | 19 | 1582 1995 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 165(3):685-688
POLAK JF THE ROLE OF THE MANUSCRIPT REVIEWER IN THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 5 | 7 |
| 133 | 3 | 27 | 1586 1995 ANESTHESIOLOGY 82(5):1181-1188
LAGASSE RS; STEINBERG ES; KATZ RI; SAUBERMANN AJ DEFINING QUALITY OF PERIOPERATIVE CARE BY STATISTICAL PROCESS-CONTROL OF ADVERSE OUTCOMES | 5 | 41 |
| 134 | 5 | 21 | 1787 1996 CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS 17(1):1-12
Jadad AR; Moore RA; Carroll D; Jenkinson C; Reynolds DJM; Gavaghan DJ; McQuay HJ Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? | 5 | 737 |
| 135 | 2 | 41 | 1830 1996 LANCET 347(9013):1459-1463
Altman LK The ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review .2. | 5 | 28 |
| 136 | 0 | 23 | 1851 1996 OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 24(5):597-602
Jones MJ; Brinn T; Pendlebury M Judging the quality of research in business schools: A comment from accounting | 5 | 9 |
| 137 | 3 | 25 | 1879 1996 SCIENTOMETRICS 36(3):397-420
vanRaan AFJ Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises | 5 | 43 |
| 138 | 1 | 3 | 2200 1998 LEARNED PUBLISHING 11(3):179-184
Donovan B The truth about peer review | 5 | 6 |
| 139 | 7 | 83 | 2282 1999 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE 25(1):7-60
Scheutzow SO State medical peer review: High cost but no benefit - Is it time for a change? | 5 | 7 |
| 140 | 3 | 32 | 2319 1999 CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 40(4):508-514
Marusic A; Marusic M Small scientific journals from small countries: Breaking from a vicious circle of inadequacy | 5 | 18 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 141 | 2 | 7 | 2926 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2781-2783
Callahan ML; Knopp RK; Gallagher EJ Effect of written feedback by editors on quality of reviews - Two tandomized trials | 5 | 5 |
| 142 | 24 | 39 | 2928 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2786-2790
Jefferson T; Wager E; Davidoff F Measuring the quality of editorial peer review | 5 | 9 |
| 143 | 0 | 1 | 2990 2002 NATURE 416(6878):258-260
Gura T Peer review, unmasked | 5 | 9 |
| 144 | 0 | 2 | 35 1973 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 224(6):884-885
PETERSON P TEACHING PEER REVIEW | 4 | 15 |
| 145 | 0 | 4 | 60 1974 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 131(12):1367-1370
MILLER RR; BLACK GC; ERTEL PY; OGRAM GF PSYCHIATRIC PEER REVIEW - OHIO SYSTEM | 4 | 9 |
| 146 | 1 | 17 | 89 1975 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 82(2):262-267
GOLDSTEIN RL; ROBERTS JS; STANTON BA; MAGLOTT DB; HORAN MJ DATA FOR PEER REVIEW - ACQUISITION AND USE - RESULTS IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICAL-CARE REVIEW ORGANIZATION PROGRAM | 4 | 11 |
| 147 | 0 | 0 | 99 1975 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 293(26):1371-1372
INGELFINGER FJ CHARITY AND PEER REVIEW IN PUBLICATION | 4 | 15 |
| 148 | 1 | 33 | 112 1975 SCIENCE 190(4219):1060-1096
GUSTAFSON T CONTROVERSY OVER PEER REVIEW | 4 | 22 |
| 149 | 0 | 0 | 146 1977 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 134(2):121-125
CHODOFF P; SANTORA P PSYCHIATRIC PEER REVIEW - WASHINGTON, DC, EXPERIENCE, 1972-1975 | 4 | 10 |
| 150 | 0 | 3 | 147 1977 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 134(2):186-188
SULLIVAN FW PEER REVIEW AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS | 4 | 9 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 151 | 0 | 5 | 164 1977 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 36(8):2066-2068
HENLEY C PEER REVIEW OF RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATIONS AT NATIONAL-INSTITUTES-OF-HEALTH .1. ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL PROCESSES | 4 | 12 |
| 152 | 0 | 1 | 165 1977 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 36(9):2186-2190
HENLEY C PEER REVIEW OF RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATIONS AT NATIONAL-INSTITUTES-OF-HEALTH .2. REVIEW BY AN INITIAL REVIEW GROUP | 4 | 12 |
| 153 | 0 | 0 | 166 1977 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 36(10):2335-2338
HENLEY C PEER REVIEW OF RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATIONS AT NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH 3 REVIEW BY AN ADVISORY BOARD-COUNCIL | 4 | 11 |
| 154 | 0 | 2 | 192 1977 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 296(21):1230-1231
ENGEBRETSEN B PEER REVIEW IN GRADUATE-EDUCATION | 4 | 7 |
| 155 | 2 | 3 | 234 1979 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 136(4):444-447
ALLEN MG PEER-REVIEW OF GROUP-THERAPY - WASHINGTON, DC, 1972-1977 | 4 | 7 |
| 156 | 4 | 50 | 320 1980 SPECULATIONS IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 3(5):533-562
RUDERFER M THE FALLACY OF PEER-REVIEW - JUDGMENT WITHOUT SCIENCE AND A CASE-HISTORY | 4 | 9 |
| 157 | 0 | 0 | 367 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):196-196
ADAIR RK A PHYSICS EDITOR COMMENTS ON PETERS AND CECIS PEER-REVIEW STUDY | 4 | 10 |
| 158 | 0 | 0 | 368 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):200-201
BELSHAW C PEER-REVIEW AND THE CURRENT-ANTHROPOLOGY EXPERIENCE | 4 | 5 |
| 159 | 0 | 6 | 371 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):205-205
CICCHETTI DV ON PEER-REVIEW - WE HAVE MET THE ENEMY AND HE IS US | 4 | 8 |
| 160 | 5 | 40 | 377 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):221-225
MANWELL C; BAKER CMA REFORM PEER-REVIEW - THE PETERS AND CECI STUDY IN THE CONTEXT OF OTHER CURRENT STUDIES OF SCIENTIFIC EVALUATION | 4 | 7 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 161 | 0 | 0 | 401 1982 CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS 60(11):32-43
SANDERS HJ PEER-REVIEW - HOW WELL IS IT WORKING | 4 | 4 |
| 162 | 1 | 6 | 422 1982 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 13(1):14-18
SECHREST L; HOFFMAN PE THE PHILOSOPHICAL UNDERPINNINGS OF PEER-REVIEW | 4 | 10 |
| 163 | 0 | 10 | 469 1983 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION 58(6):457-461
IRBY DM PEER-REVIEW OF TEACHING IN MEDICINE | 4 | 12 |
| 164 | 2 | 3 | 476 1983 JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY 10(3):479-481
RUSSELL AS; THORN BD; GRACE M PEER-REVIEW - A SIMPLIFIED APPROACH | 4 | 4 |
| 165 | 3 | 15 | 502 1984 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 39(4):406-414
THEAMAN M THE IMPACT OF PEER-REVIEW ON PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | 4 | 5 |
| 166 | 0 | 0 | 524 1984 NATURE 312(5994):497-497
MADDOX J PRIVACY AND THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM | 4 | 8 |
| 167 | 0 | 0 | 580 1985 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 313(18):1156-1157
DOLIN LC ANTITRUST-LAW VERSUS PEER-REVIEW | 4 | 10 |
| 168 | 1 | 4 | 798 1988 SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 19(2):109-115
BANNER JM PRESERVING THE INTEGRITY OF PEER-REVIEW | 4 | 13 |
| 169 | 0 | 0 | 921 1990 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 8(4):356-358
OLSON CM PEER-REVIEW OF THE BIOMEDICAL LITERATURE | 4 | 4 |
| 170 | 1 | 3 | 1051 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):157-157
MARSH HW; BALL S REFLECTIONS ON THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 4 | 4 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 171 | 2 | 10 | 1076 1991 FASEB JOURNAL 5(9):2313-2314
FORSDYKE DR BICAMERAL GRANT REVIEW - AN ALTERNATIVE TO CONVENTIONAL PEER-REVIEW | 4 | 4 |
| 172 | 1 | 32 | 1088 1991 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 265(10):1265-1270
KELLIE SE; KELLY JT MEDICARE PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATION PREPROCEDURE REVIEW CRITERIA - AN ANALYSIS OF CRITERIA FOR 3 PROCEDURES | 4 | 22 |
| 173 | 1 | 40 | 1089 1991 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 265(15):1977-1981
SANAZARO PJ; MILLS DH A CRITIQUE OF THE USE OF GENERIC SCREENING IN QUALITY ASSESSMENT | 4 | 50 |
| 174 | 2 | 9 | 1097 1991 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 44(4-5):343-345
KEMPER KJ PRIDE AND PREJUDICE IN PEER-REVIEW | 4 | 8 |
| 175 | 0 | 0 | 1147 1991 TECHNOLOGY REVIEW 94(7):28-&
MCCUTCHEN CW PEER-REVIEW - TREACHEROUS SERVANT, DISASTROUS MASTER | 4 | 8 |
| 176 | 0 | 1 | 1226 1992 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 7(3):237-239
SHIELDS WD PEER-REVIEW OF EXPERT MEDICAL-LEGAL TESTIMONY - A PROPOSAL FOR CHILD NEUROLOGY | 4 | 11 |
| 177 | 1 | 31 | 1231 1992 JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 232(3):223-228
FLETCHER SW; FLETCHER RH RESPONSIBILITIES OF MEDICAL JOURNALS TO READERS | 4 | 6 |
| 178 | 0 | 34 | 1252 1992 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 327(16):1135-1140
BERO LA; GALBRAITH A; RENNIE D THE PUBLICATION OF SPONSORED SYMPOSIUMS IN MEDICAL JOURNALS | 4 | 91 |
| 179 | 8 | 27 | 1317 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6893):1672-1675
GILLETT R; HARROW J PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .2. IS MEDICAL-RESEARCH WELL-SERVED BY PEER-REVIEW | 4 | 12 |
| 180 | 3 | 61 | 1407 1993 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 23(2):342-362
CAMPANARIO JM CONSOLATION FOR THE SCIENTIST - SOMETIMES IT IS HARD TO PUBLISH PAPERS THAT ARE LATER HIGHLY-CITED | 4 | 19 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 181 | 1 | 1 | 1581 1995 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 164(4):1007-1009
FRIEDMAN DP MANUSCRIPT PEER-REVIEW AT THE AJR - FACTS, FIGURES, AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT | 4 | 4 |
| 182 | 1 | 113 | 1719 1995 SCIENTOMETRICS 34(2):163-206
KOSTOFF RN FEDERAL, RESEARCH IMPACT ASSESSMENT - AXIOMS, APPROACHES, APPLICATIONS | 4 | 11 |
| 183 | 1 | 5 | 1852 1996 OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 24(5):603-606
Doyle JR; Arthurs AJ; McAulay L; Osborne PG Citation as effortful voting: A reply | 4 | 8 |
| 184 | 2 | 29 | 1996 1997 JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE 42(5):810-815
Fallon WF; Barnoski AL; Mancuso CL; Tinnell CA; Malangoni MA Benchmarking the quality-monitoring process: A comparison of outcomes analysis by trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) methodology with the peer-review process | 4 | 11 |
| 185 | 12 | 22 | 2084 1998 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 173():110-113
Howard L; Wilkinson G Peer review and editorial decision-making | 4 | 7 |
| 186 | 4 | 6 | 2141 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):227-228
Purcell GP; Donovan SL; Davidoff F Changes to manuscripts during the editorial process - Characterizing the evolution of a clinical paper | 4 | 13 |
| 187 | 33 | 181 | 2237 1998 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 19(3):181-211
Campanario JM Peer review for journals as it stands today - Part 1 | 4 | 10 |
| 188 | 27 | 150 | 2238 1998 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 19(4):277-306
Campanario JM Peer review for journals as it stands today - Part 2 | 4 | 8 |
| 189 | 6 | 32 | 2340 1999 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 282(4):349-355
Baldwin LM; Hart LG; Oshel RE; Fordyce MA; Cohen R; Rosenblatt RA Hospital peer review and the National Practitioner Data Bank - Clinical privileges action reports | 4 | 9 |
| 190 | 1 | 15 | 2341 1999 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 282(4):381-382
Brennan TA Hospital peer review and clinical privileges actions - To report or not report | 4 | 13 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 191 | 4 | 13 | 2510 2000 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 12(3):169-175
Shaw CD External quality mechanisms for health care: summary of the ExPeRT project on visitatie, accreditation, EFQM and ISO assessment in European Union countries | 4 | 19 |
| 192 | 0 | 10 | 2514 2000 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 12(3):239-242
Van Weert C Developments in professional quality assurance towards quality improvement: some examples of peer review in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom | 4 | 6 |
| 193 | 2 | 33 | 2742 2001 MEDICAL EDUCATION 35():2-8
Southgate L; Cox Y; David T; Hatch D; Howes A; Johnson N; Jolly B; Macdonald E; McAvoy P; McCrorie P; Turner Y The assessment of poorly performing doctors: the development of the assessment programmes for the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures | 4 | 13 |
| 194 | 8 | 16 | 2831 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 166(8):1019-1023
Hoppin FG How I review an original scientific article | 4 | 8 |
| 195 | 0 | 3 | 14 1971 NEW YORK STATE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 71(16):1963-&
FINE J; MOREHEAD MA STUDY OF PEER REVIEW OF INHOSPITAL PATIENT CARE - WITH AID OF MANUAL | 3 | 18 |
| 196 | 0 | 0 | 22 1972 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 219(8):1060-&
SCHLESS JM PEER REVIEW AS AN EDUCATIONAL CHALLENGE | 3 | 7 |
| 197 | 0 | 1 | 26 1973 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 130(3):301-304
LANGSLEY DG PEER REVIEW - PROSPECTS AND PROBLEMS | 3 | 9 |
| 198 | 0 | 0 | 105 1975 SCIENCE 188(4192):999-1001
WALSH J NSF AND ITS CRITICS IN CONGRESS - NEW PRESSURE ON PEER REVIEW | 3 | 5 |
| 199 | 0 | 0 | 107 1975 SCIENCE 189(4200):331-331
CAREY WD PEER REVIEW REVISITED | 3 | 4 |
| 200 | 1 | 3 | 163 1977 CLINICAL RESEARCH 25(5):306-311
WIENER SL; URIVETZKY M; BREGMAN D; COHEN J; EICH R; GOOTMAN N; GULOTTA S; TAYLOR B; TUTTLE R; WEBB W; WRIGHT J PEER REVIEW - INTER-REVIEWER AGREEMENT DURING EVALUATION OF RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATIONS | 3 | 3 |
Page 2: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad).
Version: 2004.05.14