| Missing Links? Citation Matrix | Graphs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
|
LOCK S, 1985, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED, ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66 INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686 CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE, BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231 COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC, |
Nodes: 3294
Authors: 5593,
Journals: 1065,
Outer References: 36825
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by LCR.
Page 2: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | 7 | 11 | 1227 1992 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY 14(6):976-980
CICCHETTI DV; ROURKE BP; WASS P PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - RELEVANCE FOR RESEARCH IN CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY | 2 | 2 |
| 102 | 7 | 14 | 1408 1993 SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-SUID-AFRIKAANSE TYDSKRIF VIR SIELKUNDE 23(1):43-48
PLUG C THE RELIABILITY OF MANUSCRIPT EVALUATION FOR THE SOUTH-AFRICAN-JOURNAL-OF-PSYCHOLOGY | 0 | 1 |
| 103 | 7 | 24 | 1423 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):60-61
LOCK S DOES EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW WORK | 7 | 11 |
| 104 | 7 | 25 | 1482 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):143-146
FISHER M; FRIEDMAN SB; STRAUSS B THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON ACCEPTANCE OF RESEARCH PAPERS BY PEER-REVIEW | 30 | 42 |
| 105 | 7 | 11 | 1606 1995 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 311(7009):826-826
SMITH R; RENNIE D AND NOW, EVIDENCE BASED EDITING - THE 3RD CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW WILL BE IN PRAGUE IN SEPTEMBER 1997 | 1 | 7 |
| 106 | 7 | 103 | 1805 1996 INTERFACES 26(4):25-55
Armstrong JS; Arkes HR; Franke RH; Peterson RA; Armstrong JS The Ombudsman: Management folklore and management science - On portfolio planning, escalation bias, and such | 2 | 6 |
| 107 | 7 | 15 | 1809 1996 ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 32(7):573-575
Beritic T Medical reviews and the importance of being a ''peer'' in science | 0 | 0 |
| 108 | 7 | 34 | 1977 1997 JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2(1):3-15
Wilkes MS The public dissemination of medical research: Problems and solutions | 0 | 15 |
| 109 | 7 | 22 | 2072 1998 ANESTHESIOLOGY 89(2):507-515
Levine RD; Sugarman M; Schiller W; Weinshel S; Lehning EJ; Lagasse RS The effect of group discussion on interrater reliability of structured peer review | 2 | 5 |
| 110 | 7 | 83 | 2282 1999 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE 25(1):7-60
Scheutzow SO State medical peer review: High cost but no benefit - Is it time for a change? | 5 | 7 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 111 | 7 | 18 | 2690 2001 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 13(5):357-365
Weingart SN; Mukamal K; Davis RB; Davies DT; Palmer RH; Cahalane M; Hamel MB; Phillips RS; Iezzoni LI Physician-reviewers' perceptions and judgments about quality of care | 0 | 0 |
| 112 | 7 | 19 | 2737 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(4):257-263
Wager E; Jefferson T Shortcomings of peer review in biomedical journals | 1 | 2 |
| 113 | 7 | 69 | 2769 2001 PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER 53(4):511-521
Berg LD Masculinism, emplacement, and positionality in peer review | 0 | 11 |
| 114 | 7 | 29 | 2789 2001 SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 7(2):193-204
Atkinson M 'Peer review' culture | 0 | 0 |
| 115 | 7 | 20 | 3076 2003 ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH 34(5):439-443
Kljakovic-Gaspic M; Hren D; Marusic A; Marusic M Peer review time: How late is late in a small medical journal? | 0 | 0 |
| 116 | 7 | 14 | 3240 2004 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 328(7441):673-675
Schroter S; Black N; Evans S; Carpenter J; Godlee F; Smith R Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial | 1 | 2 |
| 117 | 6 | 41 | 701 1987 JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY 2(2):165-176
MAHONEY MJ SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION AND KNOWLEDGE POLITICS | 7 | 28 |
| 118 | 6 | 14 | 899 1989 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 20(1):9-16
DEWITT E A LOOK BACKWARD - THE PEER-REVIEW PROGRAM OF THE AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL-ASSOCIATION | 1 | 1 |
| 119 | 6 | 10 | 926 1990 ANNALS OF ALLERGY 65(4):243-243
SLY RM BLINDING REVIEWERS IMPROVES PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 2 |
| 120 | 6 | 11 | 947 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1317-1317
RENNIE D EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION - THE 1ST-INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS | 31 | 48 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 121 | 6 | 29 | 1093 1991 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 6(3):193-195
BRUMBACK RA PUBLISHING IN BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS - THE SYSTEM IN REVIEW | 1 | 2 |
| 122 | 6 | 15 | 1196 1992 CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS 13(6):443-445
RENNIE D SUSPENDED JUDGMENT - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - LET US PUT IT ON TRIAL | 2 | 2 |
| 123 | 6 | 10 | 1243 1992 MEDICINA CLINICA 98(8):304-305
LOCK S PEER-REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PAPERS | 0 | 4 |
| 124 | 6 | 24 | 1286 1993 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 160(2):409-411
CHEW FS MANUSCRIPT PEER-REVIEW - GENERAL CONCEPTS AND THE AJR PROCESS | 2 | 3 |
| 125 | 6 | 14 | 1481 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):139-142
GILBERT JR; WILLIAMS ES; LUNDBERG GD IS THERE GENDER BIAS IN JAMAS PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 14 | 25 |
| 126 | 6 | 9 | 1484 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):152-153
SWEITZER BJ; CULLEN DJ HOW WELL DOES A JOURNALS PEER-REVIEW PROCESS FUNCTION - A SURVEY OF AUTHORS OPINIONS | 9 | 11 |
| 127 | 6 | 9 | 1615 1995 CURRENT SCIENCE 69(5):393-395
KARTHA CC PEER-REVIEW UNDER SCRUTINY | 0 | 0 |
| 128 | 6 | 17 | 1645 1995 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 10(3):175-176
BRUMBACK RA JUNK SCIENCE - IS PEER-REVIEW THE ANSWER | 0 | 2 |
| 129 | 6 | 13 | 1762 1996 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 19(3):534-&
Cicchetti DV Peer review: Agreement and disagreement - Response | 1 | 1 |
| 130 | 6 | 34 | 1763 1996 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 19(3):538-&
Velmans M Consciousness and the ''causal paradox'' - Response | 0 | 1 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 131 | 6 | 40 | 1813 1996 JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 22(11):762-769
Goldman RL; Ciesco E Improving peer review: Alternatives to unstructured judgements by a single reviewer | 3 | 5 |
| 132 | 6 | 10 | 1976 1997 JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME 22A(5):767-771
Manske PR A review of peer review | 0 | 0 |
| 133 | 6 | 79 | 2039 1997 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 18(4):297-319
Kiernan V Ingelfinger, embargoes, and other controls on the dissemination of science news | 0 | 4 |
| 134 | 6 | 10 | 2074 1998 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 128(1):66-68
Davidoff F Masking, blinding, and peer review: The blind leading the blinded | 10 | 15 |
| 135 | 6 | 34 | 2127 1998 HIGHER EDUCATION 35(4):435-452
Bazeley P Peer review and panel decisions in the assessment of Australian Research Council project grant applicants: what counts in a highly competitive context? | 2 | 4 |
| 136 | 6 | 11 | 2194 1998 LANCET 352(9126):441-445
Bingham CM; Higgins G; Coleman R; Van Der Weyden MB The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study | 7 | 18 |
| 137 | 6 | 32 | 2340 1999 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 282(4):349-355
Baldwin LM; Hart LG; Oshel RE; Fordyce MA; Cohen R; Rosenblatt RA Hospital peer review and the National Practitioner Data Bank - Clinical privileges action reports | 4 | 9 |
| 138 | 6 | 18 | 2554 2000 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE 93(4):164-167
Resch KI; Ernst E; Garrow J A randomized controlled study of reviewer bias against an unconventional therapy | 3 | 10 |
| 139 | 6 | 39 | 2564 2000 MEDICAL CARE 38(8):796-806
Weingart SN; Iezzoni LI; Davis RB; Palmer RH; Cahalane M; Hamel MB; Mukamal K; Phillips RS; Daves DT; Banks NJ Use of administrative data to find substandard care - Validation of the complications screening program | 2 | 35 |
| 140 | 6 | 69 | 2565 2000 MEDICAL CARE 38(11):1074-1091
Pearson ML; Lee JL; Chang BL; Elliott M; Kahn KL; Rubenstein LV Structured implicit review - A new method for monitoring nursing care quality | 1 | 8 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 141 | 6 | 37 | 2624 2001 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 76(9):904-908
Bordage G; Caelleigh AS Introduction - A tool for reviewers: "Review criteria for research manuscripts" | 0 | 1 |
| 142 | 6 | 20 | 2717 2001 JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE 49(1):77-84
Bovier PA; Guillain H; Perneger TV Productivity of medical research in Switzerland | 0 | 0 |
| 143 | 6 | 11 | 2853 2002 AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL 80(10):604-605
Revington ML Peer review - What is it? Why use it? | 0 | 2 |
| 144 | 6 | 13 | 2890 2002 CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 43(3):286-289
Marusic A; Lukic IK; Marusic M; McNamee D; Sharp D; Horton R Peer review in a small and a big medical journal: Case study of the Croatian Medical Journal and The Lancet | 1 | 2 |
| 145 | 6 | 16 | 2938 2002 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 9(2):105-108
Ludbrook J Peer review of manuscripts | 3 | 5 |
| 146 | 5 | 7 | 294 1980 CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY-A JOURNAL OF REVIEWS 9(2):204-207
CHUBIN DE PEER-REVIEW IN THE NATIONAL-SCIENCE-FOUNDATION - PHASE ONE OF A STUDY - COLE,S, RUBIN,L, COLE,JR | 5 | 7 |
| 147 | 5 | 7 | 363 1982 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 72(3):239-240
YANKAUER A EDITORS REPORT - PEER-REVIEW AGAIN | 5 | 8 |
| 148 | 5 | 40 | 377 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):221-225
MANWELL C; BAKER CMA REFORM PEER-REVIEW - THE PETERS AND CECI STUDY IN THE CONTEXT OF OTHER CURRENT STUDIES OF SCIENTIFIC EVALUATION | 4 | 7 |
| 149 | 5 | 12 | 408 1982 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION 57(6):481-483
ARONSON M; LAWRENCE R; TAYLOR W; DELBANCO T PEER-REVIEW IN A PRIMARY CARE EDUCATION-PROGRAM | 0 | 1 |
| 150 | 5 | 18 | 611 1986 BIOSCIENCE 36(9):607-609
CRANDALL R PEER-REVIEW - IMPROVING EDITORIAL PROCEDURES | 1 | 13 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 151 | 5 | 39 | 1008 1990 SCIENTOMETRICS 19(1-2):91-106
HARGENS LL; HERTING JR NEGLECTED CONSIDERATIONS IN THE ANALYSIS OF AGREEMENT AMONG JOURNAL REFEREES | 2 | 5 |
| 152 | 5 | 205 | 1027 1991 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE 17(3):209-248
LIPTON JP; OCONNOR M; SALES BD RETHINKING THE ADMISSIBILITY OF MEDICAL TREATISES AS EVIDENCE | 0 | 2 |
| 153 | 5 | 12 | 1140 1991 SERIALS LIBRARIAN 19(3-4):95-103
WELLER AC POTENTIAL BIAS IN EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - A STUDY OF UNITED-STATES MEDICAL JOURNALS | 1 | 4 |
| 154 | 5 | 19 | 1288 1993 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES 305(4):222-228
LEFEVRE F; FEINGLASS J; YARNOLD PR; MARTIN GJ; WEBSTER J USE OF THE RAND STRUCTURED IMPLICIT REVIEW INSTRUMENT FOR QUALITY OF CARE ASSESSMENT | 1 | 2 |
| 155 | 5 | 20 | 1299 1993 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 119(12):1209-1213
AUDET AM; SCOTT HD THE UNIFORM CLINICAL-DATA SET - AN EVALUATION OF THE PROPOSED NATIONAL DATABASE FOR MEDICARES QUALITY REVIEW PROGRAM | 3 | 22 |
| 156 | 5 | 8 | 1311 1993 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 16(2):401-403
CICCHETTI DV THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - ITS LIKE DEJA-VU ALL OVER AGAIN - AUTHORS RESPONSE | 3 | 3 |
| 157 | 5 | 5 | 1437 1994 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 309(6953):538-538
REDFERN SAT PROMOTING RESEARCH INTO PEER-REVIEW - NO QUICK FIXES | 0 | 0 |
| 158 | 5 | 67 | 1452 1994 EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 17(1):3-21
GOLDMAN RL THE RELIABILITY OF PEER ASSESSMENTS - A METAANALYSIS | 8 | 12 |
| 159 | 5 | 31 | 1476 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):92-94
JUDSON HF STRUCTURAL TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE SCIENCES AND THE END OF PEER-REVIEW | 10 | 21 |
| 160 | 5 | 14 | 1477 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):96-97
KASSIRER JP; CAMPION EW PEER-REVIEW - CRUDE AND UNDERSTUDIED, BUT INDISPENSABLE | 33 | 50 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 161 | 5 | 10 | 1646 1995 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 10(3):255-256
RIGGS JE PRIORITY, RIVALRY, AND PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 5 |
| 162 | 5 | 47 | 1661 1995 JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY 40(6):555-569
Morales ME; Maliszewski S; Greenlees M In pursuit of excellence - Quality assurance, documentation, and peer review by home birth CNMs | 0 | 1 |
| 163 | 5 | 17 | 1757 1996 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 30(5):643-652
Beatson J; Rushford N; Halasz G; Lancaster J; Prager S Group peer review: A questionnaire-based survey | 1 | 2 |
| 164 | 5 | 5 | 1771 1996 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 313(7066):1185-1185
Wessely S; Brugha T; Cowen P; Smith L; Paykel S Do authors know who refereed their paper? A questionnaire survey | 1 | 4 |
| 165 | 5 | 21 | 1787 1996 CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS 17(1):1-12
Jadad AR; Moore RA; Carroll D; Jenkinson C; Reynolds DJM; Gavaghan DJ; McQuay HJ Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? | 5 | 737 |
| 166 | 5 | 69 | 1833 1996 LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS 59(3):95-118
Jasanoff S Research subpoenas and the sociology of knowledge | 0 | 6 |
| 167 | 5 | 73 | 1931 1997 CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS 40(1):21-32
Heupler FA; Chambers CE; Dear WE; Angello DA; Heisler M Guidelines for internal peer review in the cardiac catheterization laboratory | 0 | 3 |
| 168 | 5 | 10 | 2095 1998 CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN 44():13-14
Reid AJ Canadian family physician's peer reviewers - Unsung heros | 0 | 1 |
| 169 | 5 | 13 | 2185 1998 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY 32(7):2098-2099
Parmley WW What's new in peer review? | 0 | 1 |
| 170 | 5 | 14 | 2201 1998 LEARNED PUBLISHING 11(3):185-191
van Rooyen S A critical examination of the peer review process | 1 | 2 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 171 | 5 | 19 | 2210 1998 MINERVA 36(2):179-189
Cole S Guardians of science: Fairness and reliability of peer review | 0 | 1 |
| 172 | 5 | 20 | 2218 1998 NURSING ETHICS 5(5):451-458
Crigger NJ What we owe the author: Rethinking editorial peer review | 0 | 0 |
| 173 | 5 | 31 | 2229 1998 RESEARCH POLICY 27(1):95-107
Rinia EJ; van Leeuwen TN; van Vuren HG; van Raan AFJ Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria - Evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands | 2 | 12 |
| 174 | 5 | 11 | 2296 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7175):23-27
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Black N; Smith R Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial | 22 | 27 |
| 175 | 5 | 23 | 2358 1999 JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 246(2):127-131
Bottiger LE Printed medical journals - will they survive? | 0 | 3 |
| 176 | 5 | 32 | 2381 1999 MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH 34(1):1-30
Marsh HW; Bazeley P Multiple evaluations of grant proposals by independent assessors: Confirmatory factor analysis evaluations of reliability, validity, and structure | 2 | 3 |
| 177 | 5 | 43 | 2398 1999 PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN 25(2):188-203
Petty RE; Fleming MA The review process at PSPB: Correlates of interreviewer agreement and manuscript acceptance | 0 | 2 |
| 178 | 5 | 33 | 2421 1999 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 29(5):765-776
Dirk L A measure of originality: The elements of science | 1 | 1 |
| 179 | 5 | 7 | 2422 1999 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 89(4):397-401
Good CD; Parente ST; Rennie D; Fletcher SW A worldwide assessment of medical journal editors' practices and needs results of a survey by the World Association of Medical Editors | 1 | 3 |
| 180 | 5 | 10 | 2438 2000 ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION 23(1):52-58
Seals DR; Tanaka H Manuscript peer review: A helpful checklist for students and novice referees | 0 | 2 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 181 | 5 | 8 | 2466 2000 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 176():47-51
Walsh E; Rooney M; Appleby L; Wilkinson G Open peer review: a randomised controlled trial | 7 | 11 |
| 182 | 5 | 29 | 2532 2000 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY 53(1):1-2
Holzel H; van Diest PJ The new millennium: Time for a change! | 0 | 6 |
| 183 | 5 | 36 | 2552 2000 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE 51(14):1328-1333
Weller AC Editorial peer review for electronic journals: Current issues and emerging models | 2 | 5 |
| 184 | 5 | 38 | 2563 2000 MEDICAL CARE 38(2):152-161
Hofer TP; Bernstein SJ; DeMonner S; Hayward RA Discussion between reviewers does not improve reliability of peer review of hospital quality | 2 | 12 |
| 185 | 5 | 69 | 2681 2001 HEALTH POLICY 58(3):191-213
Lombarts MJMH; Klazinga NS A policy analysis of the introduction and dissemination of external peer review (visitatie) as a means of professional self-regulation amongst medical specialists in The Netherlands in the period 1985-2000 | 1 | 2 |
| 186 | 5 | 20 | 2696 2001 JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE 82(12):1719-1722
Arrive L; Dono P; Lewin M; Dahan H; Monnier-Cholley L; Tubiana JM Publication rate of papers originally presented at the National French Congress of Radiology in 1996 | 0 | 0 |
| 187 | 5 | 29 | 2738 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(4):273-285
Shum SB; Sumner T JIME: an interactive journal for interactive media (Reprinted from First Monday, vol 6, 2001) | 0 | 0 |
| 188 | 5 | 15 | 2830 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 166(8):1013-1014
Tobin MJ Rigor of peer review and the standing of a journal | 1 | 5 |
| 189 | 5 | 12 | 2840 2002 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 40(3):323-328
Callaham ML; Schriger DL Effect of structured workshop training on subsequent performance of journal peer reviewers | 2 | 3 |
| 190 | 5 | 10 | 2841 2002 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 40(3):329-333
Day FC; Schriger DL; Todd C; Wears RL The use of dedicated methodology and statistical reviewers for peer review: A content analysis of comments to authors made by methodology and regular reviewers | 1 | 2 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 191 | 5 | 10 | 2929 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2790-2793
Weber EJ; Katz PP; Waeckerle JF; Callahan ML Author perception of peer review - Impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction | 6 | 7 |
| 192 | 5 | 15 | 3029 2002 SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 8(1):99-108
Spier RE Peer review and innovation | 1 | 2 |
| 193 | 5 | 10 | 3056 2003 ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION 27(2):47-52
Benos DJ; Kirk KL; Hall JE How to review a paper | 0 | 1 |
| 194 | 5 | 40 | 3075 2003 ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 163(15):1813-1820
Isetts BJ; Brown LM; Schondelmeyer SW; Lenarz LA Quality assessment of a collaborative approach for decreasing drug-related morbidity and achieving therapeutic goals | 0 | 0 |
| 195 | 5 | 54 | 3100 2003 CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA 333(2):115-124
Shaw CD Measuring against clinical standards | 0 | 0 |
| 196 | 5 | 31 | 3161 2003 JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INQUIRY 12(4):344-351
Starbuck WH Turning lemons into lemonade - Where is the value in peer reviews? | 0 | 0 |
| 197 | 5 | 15 | 3166 2003 JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY & NEUROSCIENCE 28(5):327-330
Young SN Peer review of manuscripts: theory and practice | 0 | 0 |
| 198 | 5 | 15 | 3181 2003 LEARNED PUBLISHING 16(1):15-20
Williamson A What will happen to peer review? | 0 | 2 |
| 199 | 5 | 10 | 3186 2003 MARINE ECOLOGY-PROGRESS SERIES 258():297-309
Riisgard HU; Kinne O; Fenchel T; Fee E; Hesslein R; Elser J; Scranton M; Cole J; Hairston N; Canuel E; Glud R; Nielsen C; Beninger P; Waagbo R; Hemre GI; Hulata G; Hoisaeter T; McLusky D; Kneib R; Shumway S; Warwick R; Hagerman L; Larsen PS; Ott J; Dworschak PC; Boero F; Gili JM; Philippart K; Seaman M Misuse of the peer-review system: time for countermeasures? | 0 | 0 |
| 200 | 5 | 36 | 3187 2003 MEDICAL DECISION MAKING 23(1):31-37
Bindels R; Hasman A; van Wersch JWJ; Pop PR; Winkens RAG The reliability of assessing the appropriateness of requested diagnostic tests | 0 | 1 |
Page 2: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad).
Version: 2004.05.14