| Missing Links? Citation Matrix | Graphs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
|
LOCK S, 1985, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED, ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66 INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686 CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE, BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231 COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC, |
Nodes: 3294
Authors: 5593,
Journals: 1065,
Outer References: 36825
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by LCR.
Page 17: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1601 | 0 | 0 | 792 1988 MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 110(1):4-4
MARCAL JM; BOCK AD PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1602 | 0 | 0 | 793 1988 MEDICAL TEACHER 10(1):69-73
MCLEOD PJ; TENENHOUSE A PEER-REVIEW OF CLASS HANDOUTS | 0 | 1 |
| 1603 | 0 | 1 | 794 1988 PEDIATRICS 81(1):172-173
MOLLER JH WHO SHOULD OR CAN PEER-REVIEW SUBSPECIALTY PROGRAMS | 0 | 0 |
| 1604 | 0 | 0 | 795 1988 PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 82(3):516-517
BARDACH J THE CASE FOR PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 2 |
| 1605 | 0 | 0 | 799 1988 SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 20(1):43-48
MCGIFFERT M IS JUSTICE BLIND - AN INQUIRY INTO PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 7 |
| 1606 | 0 | 2 | 800 1988 SCHWEIZERISCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT 118(8):255-256
[Anon] ON OUR OWN BEHALF - SAFEGUARDING QUALITY OF MEDICAL-JOURNALS THROUGH PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1607 | 0 | 1 | 801 1988 SCIENCE 239(4840):555-555
DICKSON D MANNED SPACEFLIGHT FAILS PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1608 | 0 | 0 | 802 1988 SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES 13(1-2):188-189
TURNER WA; LAVILLE F DETERMINING INFORMATION NEEDS FOR THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 0 | 0 |
| 1609 | 0 | 0 | 803 1988 SCIENTIST 2(1):6-6
AGRES T NSF PUSHED TO OPEN UP PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1610 | 0 | 1 | 804 1988 SCIENTIST 2(3):5-5
AGRES T USDA TO STRENGTHEN PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 1611 | 0 | 0 | 805 1988 SCIENTIST 2(9):21-23
KING J NSFS PEER-REVIEW MACHINERY - TIME FOR A TUNE-UP | 0 | 0 |
| 1612 | 0 | 0 | 806 1988 SCIENTIST 2(13):11-&
LEOPOLD AC THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM - PIQUE AND CRITIQUE | 0 | 0 |
| 1613 | 0 | 3 | 807 1988 SCIENTIST 2(15):1-3
MERVIS J NIH PEERS AT ITS OWN PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - AT LEAST 6 EXPERIMENTS ARE AIMED AT IMPROVING THE ODDS FOR INNOVATIVE, CROSS DISCIPLINARY, AND HIGH-RISK PROPOSALS | 0 | 0 |
| 1614 | 0 | 1 | 808 1988 SCIENTIST 2(16):14-14
MOKRASCH LC PEER-REVIEW ETHICS | 0 | 0 |
| 1615 | 0 | 1 | 809 1988 SCIENTIST 2(17):14-14
COOPER WE PEER-REVIEW FAILURES | 0 | 0 |
| 1616 | 0 | 2 | 810 1988 SCIENTIST 2(18):12-12
GIBSON WC PERILS OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1617 | 0 | 0 | 811 1988 SCIENTIST 2(19):10-10
PAQUE RE END PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1618 | 0 | 1 | 812 1988 SCIENTIST 2(24):10-10
GARFIELD E RELIGION, REBEL SCIENTISTS, AND PEER-REVIEW - 3 HOT TOPICS | 0 | 0 |
| 1619 | 0 | 1 | 815 1988 TECHNOLOGY REVIEW 91(3):26-26
STAMPS AE PREJUDICE AND PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1620 | 0 | 0 | 816 1988 TRENDS IN PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES 9(7):234-235
STAMFORD JA PEER-REVIEW - TIME FOR A CHANGE | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 1621 | 0 | 15 | 817 1988 VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW 74(3):609-634
PARTEN A PATRICK V BURGET - THE STATE ACTION DOCTRINE AND BAD FAITH PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1622 | 0 | 27 | 818 1988 VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW 74(6):1115-1140
MORTER CS THE HEALTH-CARE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1986 - WILL PHYSICIANS FIND PEER-REVIEW MORE INVITING | 3 | 6 |
| 1623 | 0 | 0 | 819 1988 WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN 16(2):225-226
SMITH NS PREDICTABLE RESULTS AND PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 5 |
| 1624 | 0 | 0 | 820 1988 WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN 16(2):226-227
GUTHERY FS PERSPECTIVES ON PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 1 |
| 1625 | 0 | 0 | 821 1988 WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN 16(2):228-229
CAPEN DE QUALITY-CONTROL OF PEER-REVIEW - AN EDITORIAL | 0 | 1 |
| 1626 | 0 | 0 | 822 1988 WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN 16(4):458-462
BISSONETTE JA PEER-REVIEW - SOME SUGGESTIONS FROM OTHER DISCIPLINES | 0 | 1 |
| 1627 | 0 | 0 | 823 1989 AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY BULLETIN 68(4):850-852
STULL GR PEER-REVIEW PROCESS IS KEY TO QUALITY PUBLICATION | 0 | 0 |
| 1628 | 0 | 0 | 824 1989 AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN 40(6):76-76
SIWEK J AFPS PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 0 | 0 |
| 1629 | 0 | 0 | 825 1989 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY 46(12):2454-2454
MALIT K PEER-REVIEW APPROACH TO MEDICATION INCIDENTS | 0 | 0 |
| 1630 | 0 | 0 | 826 1989 ANNALS OF ALLERGY 63(2):85-85
SLY RM CONTRIBUTION OF PEER-REVIEW TO SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 1631 | 0 | 1 | 828 1989 ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY 125(2):285-285
ARNDT KA PEER-REVIEW, THE ARCHIVES, AND BLANK,HARVEY | 1 | 1 |
| 1632 | 0 | 0 | 831 1989 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 298(6686):1473-1474
DAWSON J PEER-REVIEW COMES OF AGE IN CHICAGO | 0 | 0 |
| 1633 | 0 | 2 | 832 1989 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 298(6688):1645-1645
BROOKS T PEER-REVIEW FOR HOSPITALS | 0 | 0 |
| 1634 | 0 | 1 | 833 1989 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 298(6688):1645-1645
BYRNE AJ PEER-REVIEW FOR HOSPITALS | 0 | 0 |
| 1635 | 0 | 30 | 834 1989 BUFFALO LAW REVIEW 37(3):831-861
BIEBUYCK VS ANTITRUST-LAW, IMMUNITY, AND MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW BOARDS | 0 | 1 |
| 1636 | 0 | 0 | 835 1989 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 77(4):389-389
CRAIG JL PEER-REVIEW AND THE NAME OF THE BULLETIN | 0 | 0 |
| 1637 | 0 | 0 | 836 1989 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 140(10):1123-1123
SQUIRES BP AUTHORS RIGHTS .2. UNDERSTANDING PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 2 |
| 1638 | 0 | 0 | 837 1989 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 140(12):1427-1427
SQUIRES BP REVIEWING PEER-REVIEW | 1 | 1 |
| 1639 | 0 | 0 | 839 1989 CIVIL ENGINEERING 59(3):27-27
KEENAN BA PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1640 | 0 | 0 | 840 1989 CLINICAL RESEARCH 37(2):A325-A325
SAPIENZA P; LEVINE G; DAVIDSON J; GLASSMAN J; WEINRYB J; LEVY W; POMERANTZ S THE EFFECT OF PEER-REVIEW ON USE OF ENDOSCOPY | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 1641 | 0 | 10 | 843 1989 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 17(12):S169-S172
TERES D PEER-REVIEW, PUBLICATION POLICY, AND APACHE | 0 | 3 |
| 1642 | 0 | 0 | 845 1989 CURRENT SCIENCE 58(20):1114-1116
PRATHAP G A MODEST PROPOSAL FOR GLASNOST IN THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 3 | 3 |
| 1643 | 0 | 0 | 846 1989 FASEB JOURNAL 3(8):1987-1992
GREEN JG; CALHOUN F; NIERZWICKI L; BRACKETT J; MEIER P RATING INTERVALS - AN EXPERIMENT IN PEER-REVIEW | 3 | 8 |
| 1644 | 0 | 1 | 847 1989 GEOLOGY 17(12):1067-1067
TEICHERT C PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1645 | 0 | 0 | 848 1989 GEOLOGY 17(12):1067-1067
BICKFORD ME PEER-REVIEW - COMMENT | 0 | 0 |
| 1646 | 0 | 0 | 849 1989 GEOPHYSICS 54(4):423-423
SCHOENBERGER M PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1647 | 0 | 0 | 850 1989 HEALTH AFFAIRS 8(2):175-178
MORFORD TG FEDERAL EFFORTS TO IMPROVE PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS | 0 | 0 |
| 1648 | 0 | 16 | 851 1989 HEALTH PHYSICS 56(6):959-960
MOGHISSI AA; RAY DL PEER-REVIEW AND SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS IN RADIATION CANCER ASSESSMENT | 0 | 0 |
| 1649 | 0 | 0 | 853 1989 HOSPITALS 63(23):28-&
KOSKA MT PEER-REVIEW, PRIVILEGES - MDS FEAR LEGAL TANGLES | 0 | 0 |
| 1650 | 0 | 6 | 854 1989 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS 30(1):11-15
ROOTH G PEER-REVIEW THROUGH PERINATAL STATISTICS | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 1651 | 0 | 5 | 855 1989 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS 30(1):27-32
AWAN AK; AWAN AH; AKHTAR R MEDICAL AUDIT BY PEER-REVIEW AND COMPETITIVE SELF-APPRAISAL AS TOOLS FOR PROMOTING EFFICIENCY - A CASE-STUDY IN LAHORE, PAKISTAN | 0 | 0 |
| 1652 | 0 | 0 | 856 1989 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS 30(1):33-36
SRINIVASAN V PEER-REVIEW AMONG DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICERS IN MAHARASHTRA, INDIA | 0 | 1 |
| 1653 | 0 | 4 | 857 1989 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 261(5):695-695
FEINBERG BA PEER-REVIEW AND THE NCI CLINICAL ALERT ON NODE-NEGATIVE BREAST-CANCER | 1 | 1 |
| 1654 | 0 | 0 | 858 1989 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 261(5):695-696
ROPER M; WITTES RE PEER-REVIEW AND THE NCI CLINICAL ALERT ON NODE-NEGATIVE BREAST-CANCER - REPLY | 0 | 0 |
| 1655 | 0 | 2 | 862 1989 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 262(14):1951-1951
TORMA MJ THE DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE EXTERNAL CIVILIAN PEER-REVIEW OF MEDICAL-CARE | 0 | 0 |
| 1656 | 0 | 0 | 863 1989 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 262(14):1951-1951
MAYER W; CLINTON JJ; NEWHALL D THE DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE EXTERNAL CIVILIAN PEER-REVIEW OF MEDICAL-CARE - REPLY | 0 | 0 |
| 1657 | 0 | 2 | 864 1989 JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY 167(4):96-&
EVERS CJ; PEARSON DB LESSONS LEARNED FROM PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1658 | 0 | 0 | 865 1989 JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY 167(6):87-90
MACKLIN M HOW 3 FIRMS BENEFITED FROM PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1659 | 0 | 3 | 866 1989 JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES 29(4):261-266
SPRING JD; KEYS JT; GARSON LR DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PEER-REVIEW PLUS - A COMPUTER-BASED TRACKING SYSTEM FOR EDITORIAL OFFICES | 0 | 0 |
| 1660 | 0 | 0 | 867 1989 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 42(1):1-4
FEINSTEIN AR; SPITZER WO THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - AND AN ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF OUR PEERLESS REVIEWERS | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 1661 | 0 | 0 | 869 1989 JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH 68(9):1375-1375
HAND AR; DAWES C CONFERENCE REPORT - 1ST INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATIONS, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, MAY 10-12, 1989 | 0 | 1 |
| 1662 | 0 | 3 | 870 1989 JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH 68(10):1379-1380
TAUBMAN MA WHITHER PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1663 | 0 | 20 | 871 1989 JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION 57(2):151-169
MARSH HW; BALL S THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS USED TO EVALUATE MANUSCRIPTS SUBMITTED TO ACADEMIC JOURNALS - INTERJUDGMENTAL RELIABILITY | 9 | 16 |
| 1664 | 0 | 2 | 872 1989 JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR 30(3):R4-R5
[Anon] PEER-REVIEW ALWAYS HELPS BUT NEVER CURES | 0 | 0 |
| 1665 | 0 | 0 | 873 1989 JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 158(4):A343-A343
RAMSAY AD; GALLAGHER PJ QUALITY-CONTROL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY BY PEER-REVIEW - THE SOUTHAMPTON EXPERIENCE | 1 | 3 |
| 1666 | 0 | 0 | 874 1989 JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH 59(1):11-11
PIGG RM PEER-REVIEW, BIRTH OF AN INDEX, AND A TRIP TO TAIWAN | 0 | 0 |
| 1667 | 0 | 14 | 875 1989 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY 20(4):670-674
GRABSKI WJ; SALASCHE SJ; MCCOLLOUGH ML; BERKLAND ME; GUTIERREZ JA; FINSTUEN K INTERPRETATION OF MOHS MICROGRAPHIC FROZEN-SECTIONS - A PEER-REVIEW COMPARISON STUDY | 0 | 8 |
| 1668 | 0 | 7 | 876 1989 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF LONDON 23(3):177-180
HUNT BJ; DAVIES SC THE POTENTIAL USE OF A 5-DAY WARD IN A MEDICAL UNIT - AUDIT BY PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1669 | 0 | 0 | 878 1989 MINNESOTA MEDICINE 72(10):593-&
[Anon] THE HEALTH-CARE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ACT - ENHANCED PEER-REVIEW IMMUNITY | 0 | 0 |
| 1670 | 0 | 1 | 879 1989 NATURE 339(6219):11-11
MADDOX J WHERE NEXT WITH PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 1 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 1671 | 0 | 0 | 880 1989 NATURE 339(6221):164-164
ANDERSON A PEER-REVIEW - DOES IT WORK EFFICIENTLY | 1 | 3 |
| 1672 | 0 | 0 | 881 1989 NATURE 339(6221):170-170
MORGAN GL PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1673 | 0 | 0 | 882 1989 NATURE 339(6224):414-414
NICHOLLS RW PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1674 | 0 | 1 | 883 1989 NATURE 339(6224):414-414
SMETHURST PC PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1675 | 0 | 2 | 884 1989 NATURE 340(6230):173-173
ANDERSON A PLAGIARISM CHARGE CASTS SHADOW ON PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 3 |
| 1676 | 0 | 1 | 885 1989 NATURE 340(6233):424-424
HERSHEY DR PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 1 |
| 1677 | 0 | 1 | 886 1989 NATURE 340(6235):588-588
TSIQUAYE KN; ZUCKERMAN AJ PEER-REVIEW (CONTINUED) | 0 | 0 |
| 1678 | 0 | 0 | 887 1989 NATURE 340(6235):588-588
LOEHLE C PEER-REVIEW (CONTINUED) | 0 | 1 |
| 1679 | 0 | 1 | 888 1989 NATURE 340(6235):588-588
SARKAR G PEER-REVIEW (CONTINUED) | 0 | 0 |
| 1680 | 0 | 0 | 889 1989 NATURE 341(6240):275-275
ASHALL F PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 1681 | 0 | 2 | 890 1989 NATURE 341(6240):275-275
VISVANATHAN KV PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1682 | 0 | 0 | 893 1989 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 321(4):265-265
CURRAN WJ LEGAL IMMUNITY FOR PEER-REVIEW PROGRAMS - REPLY | 0 | 0 |
| 1683 | 0 | 2 | 895 1989 NEW SCIENTIST 123(1674):24-24
GAVAGHAN H POACHED PAPER CHALLENGES PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 0 | 0 |
| 1684 | 0 | 0 | 896 1989 NEW STATESMAN & SOCIETY 2(35):16-17
HODGSON G PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1685 | 0 | 0 | 897 1989 OPHTHALMOLOGY 96(7):929-930
LICHTER PR SCRUTINIZING PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1686 | 0 | 0 | 901 1989 RESEARCH JOURNAL OF THE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION 61(11-12):1619-1619
LUTHY RG THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS AND THE QUALITY OF THE RESEARCH JOURNAL | 0 | 0 |
| 1687 | 0 | 9 | 902 1989 SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 20(2):116-122
BANNER JM GUIDELINES FOR PEER-REVIEW OF SPONSORED BOOK MANUSCRIPTS | 0 | 0 |
| 1688 | 0 | 0 | 904 1989 SCIENCE 244(4907):910-912
SUN M PEER-REVIEW COMES UNDER PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 16 |
| 1689 | 0 | 1 | 905 1989 SCIENCE 245(4915):250-250
MARSHALL E NSF PEER-REVIEW UNDER FIRE FROM NADER GROUP | 1 | 1 |
| 1690 | 0 | 2 | 907 1989 SCIENTIST 3(7):1-&
LIVERSIDGE A PNAS PUBLICATION OF AIDS ARTICLE SPURS DEBATE OVER PEER-REVIEW - IS THE NATIONAL ACADEMY TO BE PRAISED OR CHASTENED FOR DISSEMINATING THE VIEWS OF CONTROVERSIAL SCIENTIST DUESBERG,PETER | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 1691 | 0 | 2 | 908 1989 SCIENTIST 3(16):13-13
FORSDYKE DR PEER-REVIEW POLICY | 1 | 1 |
| 1692 | 0 | 1 | 909 1989 SCIENTIST 3(21):16-16
GLITZENSTEIN ER NSF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1693 | 0 | 1 | 910 1989 SCIENTIST 3(22):16-16
LOOP MS PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1694 | 0 | 0 | 912 1989 SOCIAL WORK 34(1):3-4
HOPPS JG PEER-REVIEW - A TRUST, NOT A VAULT | 0 | 4 |
| 1695 | 0 | 14 | 913 1989 TORT & INSURANCE LAW JOURNAL 24(3):571-592
JAFFE CLG THE HEALTH-CARE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ACT - ANTITRUST LIABILITY IN PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 1696 | 0 | 0 | 914 1989 TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES 14(6):213-213
BRADSHAW RA PEER-REVIEW AND PUBLISHING - REPLY | 0 | 0 |
| 1697 | 0 | 2 | 915 1989 TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES 14(6):213-213
MADDOX J PEER-REVIEW AND PUBLISHING | 0 | 0 |
| 1698 | 0 | 0 | 917 1989 WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 151(5):561-561
DIPPE SE; BELL MM THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - RESPONSE | 0 | 0 |
| 1699 | 0 | 0 | 919 1990 ACADEME-BULLETIN OF THE AAUP 76(3):31-35
SCALES AC; VANALSTYNE WW; GRAY MW; ROSENTHAL JT; FREEDMAN JO; BARTHOLET E; GETMAN JG UNIVERSITY-OF-PENNSYLVANIA V EEOC AND THE STATUS OF PEER-REVIEW - A SYMPOSIUM | 0 | 0 |
| 1700 | 0 | 0 | 920 1990 AMERICAN ANTIQUITY 55(4):665-666
REID JJ PEER-REVIEW AT AMERICAN ANTIQUITY | 0 | 0 |
Page 17: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad).
Version: 2004.05.14