Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Thu Jun 24 16:13:03 2004
Papers found on a Topic Search of "Peer Review"
and papers citing Steve Lock's "A Difficult
Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine"
and these papers/books added:
LOCK S, 1985, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED,
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE,
BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231
COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC,

Nodes: 3294
Authors: 5593, Journals: 1065, Outer References: 36825
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by first author.
Page 31:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
3001001417 1994 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 168(1):1-1
WAITE VS; WALKER R
MEDICAL AND SURGICAL PEER-REVIEW
22
30024121641 1995 JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 21(5):227-231
WAKEFIELD DS; HELMS CM
THE ROLE OF PEER-REVIEW IN A HEALTH-CARE ORGANIZATION DRIVEN BY TQM/CQI
23
300300466 1983 JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH 62():234-234
WALDMAN HB; SHAKUN ML
ATTITUDE TOWARDS PEER-REVIEW BY HEALTH PROFESSION STUDENTS
00
3004112001 1997 LANCET 349(9044):63-63
Waldron HA
Peer review and grant applications
02
30050152868 2002 BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION 80(1):47-55
Walker D; McDermott JM; Fox-Rushby J; Tanjung M; Nadjib M; Widiatmoko D; Achadi E
An economic analysis of midwifery training programmes in South Kalimantan, Indonesia
00
3006041326 1993 CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (294):4-6
WALKER DG
THE CLASSIC - BONE-RESORPTION RESTORED IN OSTEOPETROTIC MICE BY TRANSPLANTS OF NORMAL BONE-MARROW AND SPLEEN-CELLS (REPRINTED FROM SCIENCE, VOL 190, PG 784, 1975)
02
30070242859 2002 BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE 52(476):181-186
Walker J; Mathers N
The impact of a general practice group intervention on prescribing costs and patterns
04
3008022969 2002 LANCET 359(9325):2282-2282
Wallace H
The need for independent scientific peer review of Biobank UK
01
30090391035 1991 AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY 10(1):53-68
WALLACE WA
PEER-REVIEW FILINGS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS IN EVALUATING SELF-REGULATION
00
3010111630 1986 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT 33(4):218-222
WALLMARK JT; SEDIG KG
QUALITY OF RESEARCH MEASURED BY CITATION METHOD AND BY PEER-REVIEW - A COMPARISON
17
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
3011582466 2000 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 176():47-51
Walsh E; Rooney M; Appleby L; Wilkinson G
Open peer review: a randomised controlled trial
711
301200105 1975 SCIENCE 188(4192):999-1001
WALSH J
NSF AND ITS CRITICS IN CONGRESS - NEW PRESSURE ON PEER REVIEW
35
301301106 1975 SCIENCE 189(4197):123-123
WALSH J
NSF TO MAKE MORE PEER REVIEW INFORMATION AVAILABLE
00
301402108 1975 SCIENCE 189(4201):435-437
WALSH J
NSF PEER REVIEW HEARINGS - HOUSE PANEL STARTS WITH CRITICS
07
301503110 1975 SCIENCE 190(4211):253-256
WALSH J
PEER REVIEW - NSF FACES CHANGES, QUESTION IS HOW EXTENSIVE
24
301601723 1987 SCIENCE 235(4785):153-153
WALSH J
PEER-REVIEW - OOPS - MERIT REVIEW IN FOR SOME CHANGES AT NSF
11
301700728 1987 SCIENCE 238(4833):1506-1506
WALSH J
GEOGRAPHICAL LIMIT ON RESEARCH FUNDS IN BILL SEEN AS SWIPE AT PEER-REVIEW
00
3018002327 1999 GASTROENTEROLOGY 117(2):293-294
Walsh JH
E-biomed: Improving access or a threat to peer review?
00
3019011917 1997 BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL 182(9):330-330
Walters H
Peer review: Stifles innovation?
00
3020001729 1995 TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY 23(2):226-234
WARD JM; HARDISTY JF; HAILEY JR; STREETT CS
PEER-REVIEW IN TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
19
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
30210171337 1993 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY 48(1):9-14
WAREHAM V; BAIN C; CRUICKSHANK D
CESAREAN-SECTION AUDIT BY PEER-REVIEW
03
3022001512 1994 JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE AND CORNEAL SURGERY 10(2):S169-S169
WARING GO
SCIENTIFIC JOURNALISM - PROCEEDINGS VERSUS PEER-REVIEW
00
3023001824 1996 JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY 12(2):221-221
Waring GO
Proceedings vs peer review
00
3024001983 1997 JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY 13(5):S424-S424
Waring GO; Waring SG
Proceedings vs. peer review
00
30250142838 2002 ANESTHESIOLOGY 97(1):1-3
Warltier DC; Kersten JR; Pagel PS; Gross GJ
Anesthetic preconditioning: Serendipity and science
09
30260232539 2000 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE 26(6):453-459
Warner J
A critical review of the application of citation studies to the Research Assessment Exercises
17
30273473143 2003 JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES 43(2):362-373
Warr WA
Evaluation of an experimental chemistry preprint server
11
3028112523 2000 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 283(7):886-886
Warren E
The National Practitioner Data Bank and the quality of peer review
00
3029111550 1994 SCIENCE 266(5187):954-954
WARREN KS
PEER-REVIEW STUDY
00
30301561945 1997 ENDOCRINOLOGIST 7(5):322-333
Wartofsky L
Bioequivalence of levothyroxine preparations: Shortcomings and implications of a recently published study
07
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
30312752016 1997 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 72(2):430-469
Washington MJ
The practice of peer review in the international nuclear safety regime
00
30321393152 2003 JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE 52(12):956-964
Watson LC; Pignone MP
Screening accuracy for late-life depression in primary care: A systematic review
01
30330821500 1994 JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH 48(1):16-21
WATT IS; FRANKS AJ; SHELDON TA
HEALTH AND HEALTH-CARE OF RURAL POPULATIONS IN THE UK - IS IT BETTER OR WORSE
026
303411992 1990 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 322(9):638-638
WAYE JD
EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW
00
303511722 1987 SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 18(4):277-279
WEBB RK
A DIFFICULT BALANCE - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICINE - LOCK,S
00
30363172147 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):257-259
Weber EJ; Callaham ML; Wears RL; Barton C; Young G
Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting - Why investigators fail to publish
735
30375102929 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2790-2793
Weber EJ; Katz PP; Waeckerle JF; Callahan ML
Author perception of peer review - Impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction
67
3038001349 1993 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE 3(1):1-2
WEBER MG
PEER-REVIEW
011
3039002730 2001 JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 122(3):419-420
Wechsler AS
Peer review: Recognition and responsibility
11
3040113174 2003 JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 126(6):1681-1682
Wechsler AS; Fried PW
Peer review
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
30410143292 2004 THORAX 59(3):183-183
Wedzicha JA
Peer review and NICE COPD guidelines
00
3042015178 1977 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION 70(2):157-160
WEED JE; MOLLESON AL
ESTABLISHING GUIDELINES FOR PEER REVIEW OF CLINICAL DIETITIAN
05
304308971 1990 JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION 61(2):198-219
WEEKS KM
THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - CONFIDENTIALITY AND DISCLOSURE
13
30442221627 1995 HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 30(3):489-506
WEI FF; MARK D; HARTZ A; CAMPBELL C
ARE PRO DISCHARGE SCREENS ASSOCIATED WITH POSTDISCHARGE ADVERSE OUTCOMES
16
304501417 1982 PHYSICS TODAY 35(3):13-13
WEINBERG AM
PEER-REVIEW REVISITED
00
304607285 1980 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 139(3):348-351
WEINER JP; GIBSON G; MUNSTER AM
USE OF PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTICS IN SURGICAL-PROCEDURES - PEER-REVIEW GUIDELINES AS A METHOD FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE
07
30478212915 2002 HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 37(2):483-498
Weingart SN; Davis RB; Palmer RH; Cahalane M; Hamel MB; Mukamal K; Phillips RS; Davies DT; Iezzoni LI
Discrepancies between explicit and implicit review: Physician and nurse assessments of complications and quality
03
30486392564 2000 MEDICAL CARE 38(8):796-806
Weingart SN; Iezzoni LI; Davis RB; Palmer RH; Cahalane M; Hamel MB; Mukamal K; Phillips RS; Daves DT; Banks NJ
Use of administrative data to find substandard care - Validation of the complications screening program
235
30497182690 2001 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 13(5):357-365
Weingart SN; Mukamal K; Davis RB; Davies DT; Palmer RH; Cahalane M; Hamel MB; Phillips RS; Iezzoni LI
Physician-reviewers' perceptions and judgments about quality of care
00
3050112118 1998 EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 21(4):413-418
Weinmann C
Quality improvement in health care - A brief history of the Medicare Peer Review Organization (PRO) initiative
22
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
3051172607 2000 SPINE 25(18):2277-2279
Weinstein JN
Peer review: Quality improvement at its best
01
30523242391 1999 NEUROLOGIC CLINICS 17(2):363-+
Weintraub MI
Expert witness testimony - An update
05
30530171351 1993 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 270(4):459-464
WEISS RB; VOGELZANG NJ; PETERSON BA; PANASCI LC; CARPENTER JT; GAVIGAN M; SARTELL K; FREI E; MCINTYRE OR
A SUCCESSFUL SYSTEM OF SCIENTIFIC-DATA AUDITS FOR CLINICAL-TRIALS
036
30540049 1973 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 289(19):1046-1046
WELCH CE
PEER REVIEW OR FEDERAL PEERING - REPLY
00
3055012973 2002 LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH 24(3):305-305
Weller A
Editorial peer review, its strengths and weaknesses (vol 23, pg 37, 2001)
00
305611705 1987 LIBRARY QUARTERLY 57(3):330-331
WELLER AC
A DIFFICULT BALANCE - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICINE - LOCK,S
00
3057321932 1990 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 78(3):258-265
WELLER AC
EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - METHODOLOGY AND DATA-COLLECTION
01
305818952 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1344-1347
WELLER AC
EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN UNITED-STATES MEDICAL JOURNALS
1832
30595121140 1991 SERIALS LIBRARIAN 19(3-4):95-103
WELLER AC
POTENTIAL BIAS IN EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - A STUDY OF UNITED-STATES MEDICAL JOURNALS
14
30604141773 1996 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 84(3):359-366
Weller AC
Editorial peer review: A comparison of authors publishing in two groups of US medical journals
04
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
30615362552 2000 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE 51(14):1328-1333
Weller AC
Editorial peer review for electronic journals: Current issues and emerging models
25
3062022791 2001 SCIENTIST 15(21):39-39
Weller AC
Peer review: Do studies prove its effectiveness?
10
3063052934 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2865-2866
Weller AC
Qualitative and quantitative measures of indexed health sciences electronic journals
01
3064041700 1995 POPULATION RESEARCH AND POLICY REVIEW 14(3):277-282
WELLER B
BIOSOCIAL MODELS OF DEMOGRAPHIC BEHAVIOR - AN INTRODUCTION
00
30651122902 2002 FAMILY MEDICINE 34(10):738-743
Wendling A; Hoekstra L
Interactive peer review: An innovative resident evaluation tool
00
30662142009 1997 NATURE 387(6631):341-343
Wenneras C; Wold A
Nepotism and sexism in peer-review
1997
306700575 1985 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 313(7):455-455
WENTWORTH P
JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW
00
3068021462 1983 IOWA LAW REVIEW 68(3):585-600
WENTZ JA
BALANCING ACADEMIC-FREEDOM AND CIVIL-RIGHTS - TOWARD AN APPROPRIATE PRIVILEGE FOR THE VOTES OF ACADEMIC PEER-REVIEW COMMITTEES
00
30690017 1972 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND ARCHIVES OF AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OPTOMETRY 49(10):884-&
WERNER DL
PEER REVIEW IN AN INSTITUTIONAL SETTING EXPERIENCE AT OPTOMETRIC CENTER OF NEW YORK
00
30700162894 2002 DISEASE MANAGEMENT & HEALTH OUTCOMES 10(12):743-748
Wertheimer AI; Chaney NM
Clinical guidelines in disease management
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
307118371857 1996 PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE 26(5):883-886
Wessely S
What do we know about peer review?
36
307216462193 1998 LANCET 352(9124):301-305
Wessely S
Peer review of grant applications: what do we know?
1016
3073551771 1996 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 313(7066):1185-1185
Wessely S; Brugha T; Cowen P; Smith L; Paykel S
Do authors know who refereed their paper? A questionnaire survey
14
307406481 1983 NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL 96(728):216-217
WEST SR
PEER-REVIEW - CENTRAL-EDUCATION-COMMITTEE STATEMENT
12
30750611858 1996 RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 68(1-2):143-150
Western R
Environmental challenges and opportunities: The new era of radioactive waste management
00
307600104 1975 SCIENCE 188(4185):204-&
WESTHEAD EW
PEER REVIEW - DISTRIBUTION OF REVIEWERS
02
307700435 1982 SCIENCE 215(4531):344-&
WESTLEY J
NSF PEER-REVIEW
00
30781193184 2003 LEARNED PUBLISHING 16(4):249-258
Wets K; Weedon D; Velterop J
Post-publication filtering and evaluation: Faculty of 1000
00
307900777 1988 JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE 3(1):59-63
WHALEN JP; SCHMITT BP; ROSSETTI AM
EARLY EXPERIENCE WITH PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS
00
3080072163 1998 JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY IN HIGHER EDUCATION 22(3):413-417
Whalley WB; Rea BR
Two examples of the use of 'electronic posters'
01
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
3081032299 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7191):1144-1145
Whatling P
Having non-medical readers of papers on Internet will enhance peer review
06
30821141752 1996 ANNALS OF SURGERY 224(2):145-154
Wherry DC; Marohn MR; Malanoski MP; Hetz SP; Rich NM
An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the steady state performed in medical treatment facilities of the department of defense
067
30830181428 1994 ANNALS OF SURGERY 220(5):626-634
WHERRY DC; ROB CG; MAROHN MR; RICH NM
AN EXTERNAL AUDIT OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY PERFORMED IN MEDICAL-TREATMENT FACILITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE
145
3084211758 1988 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 297(6655):1000-1000
WHIMSTER WF
CONFERENCE PREVIEWS
01
3085003084 2003 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 326(7383):241-241
White C
Little evidence for effectiveness of scientific peer review
13
3086001025 1991 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC MEDICINE AND PATHOLOGY 12(3):272-273
WHITE L
PEER-REVIEW FOR MEDICAL EXAMINERS
00
3087001285 1993 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL 21(6):279-282
WHITE MC
THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS OF THE JOURNAL
11
3088022740 2001 LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH 23(4):371-372
White MD
Editorial peer review, its strengths and weaknesses
00
30890292632 2001 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY 154(11):993-999
White ME; McDonnell SM; Werker DH; Cardenas VM; Thacker SB
Partnerships in International Applied Epidemiology Training and Service, 1975-2001
04
309011842 1989 CORNELL VETERINARIAN 79(4):311-313
WHITE MH
THANK YOU, REVIEWERS
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
309103386 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):241-241
WHITE MJ
SOME PROCEDURAL OBSCURITIES IN PETERS AND CECIS PEER-REVIEW STUDY
00
3092001649 1995 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LIGAND ASSAY 18(1):54-57
WHITLEY RJ
OCCULT ECTOPIC ACTH SYNDROME
00
30930182553 2000 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION 36(3):493-499
Whittemore RC; Beebe J
EPA's basins model: Good science or serendipitous modeling?
04
3094001806 1996 INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY 109(1):1-2
Wick G
The peer review system - Still no alternative in sight
00
3095001181 1992 BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES 40(1):57-68
WICKS S
PEER-REVIEW AND QUALITY-CONTROL IN HIGHER-EDUCATION
00
30960422810 2001 WRITTEN COMMUNICATION 18(2):107-179
Wiemelt J
Toward an activity-based conception of writing and school writing contexts
00
309713163 1977 CLINICAL RESEARCH 25(5):306-311
WIENER SL; URIVETZKY M; BREGMAN D; COHEN J; EICH R; GOOTMAN N; GULOTTA S; TAYLOR B; TUTTLE R; WEBB W; WRIGHT J
PEER REVIEW - INTER-REVIEWER AGREEMENT DURING EVALUATION OF RESEARCH GRANT APPLICATIONS
33
3098042711 2001 JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES 46(6):1303-1308
Wiggins KG
Forensic textile fiber examination across the USA and Europe
02
3099002276 1999 ALTEX-ALTERNATIVEN ZU TIEREXPERIMENTEN 16(3):163-166
Wilcox NL
Validation and regulatory acceptance of alternative test methods and international co-operation
00
3100002727 2001 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY 37(2):197A-197A
Wiles JD; Samra JS; Gill R; Deedwania PC
Can the external peer review process provide adequate feedback to sustain the implementation of the heart failure guidelines by primary care providers?
00

Page 31:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14