Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Thu Jun 24 16:13:03 2004
Papers found on a Topic Search of "Peer Review"
and papers citing Steve Lock's "A Difficult
Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine"
and these papers/books added:
LOCK S, 1985, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED,
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE,
BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231
COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC,

Nodes: 3294
Authors: 5593, Journals: 1065, Outer References: 36825
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by first author.
Page 30:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2901253064 2003 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 168(3):397-398
Tobin MJ
Peer review and manuscript triage
00
2902381102 1991 JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE 33(12):1240-1243
TOMENSON JA; PADDLE GM
BETTER QUALITY STUDIES THROUGH REVIEW OF PROTOCOLS
03
2903011674 1995 KERNTECHNIK 60(2-3):75-81
TOMIC B
INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES TO IMPROVE THE METHODS OF PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND TO SUPPORT ITS APPLICATIONS
00
2904142733 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(1):33-40
Tomlins CL
Just one more 'zine? Maintaining and improving the scholarly journal in the electronic present: a view from the humanities
00
2905001112 1991 MINNESOTA MEDICINE 74(6):41-41
TOMPKINS RB
MMA COULD ENSURE EDUCATIONAL-ROLE FOR PEER-REVIEW
00
290601281 1979 TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES 4(8):N173-N174
TOOZE J
INTERNATIONAL PEER-REVIEW
01
290702862 1989 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 262(14):1951-1951
TORMA MJ
THE DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE EXTERNAL CIVILIAN PEER-REVIEW OF MEDICAL-CARE
00
2908023248 2004 CHRONOBIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL 21(1):161-170
Touitou Y; Portaluppi F; Smolensky MH; Rensing L
Ethical principles and standards for the conduct of human and animal biological rhythm research
00
29092101116 1991 NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL 104(904):8-10
TRACEY JM
PEER-REVIEW .1. ATTITUDES TO INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL STANDARDS
23
2910151117 1991 NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL 104(906):66-67
TRACEY JM
PEER-REVIEW .2. THE INFLUENCE OF INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL STANDARDS ON OUTCOME
02
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
29118221131 1991 SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES 16(3):322-341
TRAVIS GDL; COLLINS HM
NEW LIGHT ON OLD BOYS - COGNITIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL PARTICULARISM IN THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM
513
2912163045 2002 TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION 17(8):349-350
Tregenza T
Gender bias in the refereeing process?
13
291300263 1979 MEDICAL CARE 17(11):1154-1154
TREMBLAY J; LEBLANC PP
PEER-REVIEW IN AMBULATORY CARE - COMMENT
00
2914001103 1991 JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE 1(3):49-56
TREVATHAN LE
LOW INPUT SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND THE REGIONAL APPROACH TO PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION
01
29150212373 1999 JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE 47(6):1018-1026
Trooskin SZ; Copes WS; Bain LW; Santora TA
Case-matching methodology as an adjunct to trauma performance improvement for evaluating lengths of stay and complications
01
291601886 1989 NATURE 340(6235):588-588
TSIQUAYE KN; ZUCKERMAN AJ
PEER-REVIEW (CONTINUED)
00
29170363112 2003 CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY 13(1):17-22
Tubaro A; Trucchi A; Miano L
Investigation of benign prostatic hyperplasia
00
29181252135 1998 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS 79():431-448
Tuckett D
Evaluating psychoanalytic papers - Towards the development of common editorial standards
214
2919001328 1993 COASTAL MANAGEMENT 21(2):113-129
TUOHY WS
CHARACTERIZING THE SAN-FRANCISCO ESTUARY - A CASE-STUDY OF SCIENCE MANAGEMENT IN THE NATIONAL ESTUARY PROGRAM
04
2920022772 2001 PSYCOLOQUY 12(12):1-4
Turner R
An end to great publishing myths - Book review of Tenopir and King on electronic-journals
03
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
292100802 1988 SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES 13(1-2):188-189
TURNER WA; LAVILLE F
DETERMINING INFORMATION NEEDS FOR THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS
00
2922001058 1991 BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER 63(2):168-170
TWENTYMAN P; SELBY P
THE PROCESS OF PEER-REVIEW
13
2923021055 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):164-164
TYRER P
CHAIRMANS ACTION - THE IMPORTANCE OF EXECUTIVE DECISIONS IN PEER-REVIEW
22
2924002618 2001 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 222():U216-U216
Tyson J; Davis H
Teaching critical thinking skills through writing: Making peer review an effective part of the process.
00
2925091906 1997 ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY 64(5):1451-1455
Uhlig PN
Understanding the new world of health care
00
29260123051 2003 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 78(3):286-294
Uijtdehaage SHJ; Contini J; Candler CS; Dennis SE
Sharing digital teaching resources: Breaking down barriers by addressing the concerns of faculty members
01
2927020688 1987 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 9(2):193-227
UVEGES JA
IDENTIFYING THE IMPACTS OF NASPAAS MPA STANDARDS AND PEER-REVIEW PROCESS ON EDUCATION FOR THE PUBLIC-SERVICE - 1975-1985
04
29280263037 2002 SPINE 27(16):S59-S65
Vaccaro AR; Anderson DG; Toth CA
Recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 (Bone morphogenetic protein-7) as an osteoinductive agent in spinal fusion
03
29290413124 2003 HUMAN REPRODUCTION 18(5):1000-1004
Vail A; Gardener E
Common statistical errors in the design and analysis of subfertility trials
07
293001207 1978 ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 138(2):197-197
VAISRUB S
PEER REVIEW - VIEW FROM ANOTHER PIER
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
29310164 1974 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 111(7):693-695
VALBERG L; MORRIN PAF; MARKS GS; CLARK A; SOUTHALL GA
CONFERENCES ON DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC ASPECTS OF PATIENT-CARE BASED ON PEER REVIEW OF PROBLEM ORIENTED RECORD
00
29320142596 2000 REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION CLINICA 52(3):261-265
Valdez-Martinez E; Garduno-Espinosa J; Martinez-Garcia MDC; Lavielle-Sotomayor P; Amato-Martinez JD; Blanco-Favela F; Munoz-Hernandez O
Satisfaction related factors of attendants to a medical research meeting
00
29330168 1974 HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY 25(10):678-679
VALENTIN.J
PEER REVIEW, QUALITY OF CARE, AND PROBLEM-ORIENTED RECODS - 3 ASPECTS OF ACCOUNTABILITY
02
29340292405 1999 QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 8(3):161-166
van den Hombergh P; Grol R; van den Hoogen HJM; van den Bosch WJHM
Practice visits as a tool in quality improvement: mutual visits and feedback by peers compared with visits and feedback by non-physician observers
05
29350222406 1999 QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 8(3):167-171
van den Hombergh P; Grol R; van den Hoogen HJM; van den Bosch WJHM
Practice visits as a tool in quality improvement: acceptance and feasibility
12
29360322650 2001 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 322(7287):654-657
van Eijk MEC; Avorn J; Porsius AJ; de Boer A
Reducing prescribing of highly anticholinergic antidepressants for elderly people: randomised trial of group versus individual academic detailing
09
29370142823 2002 ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS 16():S18-S28
Van Eldik LJ; Koppal T; Watterson DM
Barriers to Alzheimer disease drug discovery and development in academia
00
29383202347 1999 JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 29(12):2550-2566
Van Lange PAM
Why authors believe that reviewers stress limiting aspects of manuscripts: The SLAM effect in peer review
13
2939013195 2003 NATURE 423(6936):116-116
van Loon AJ
Peer review: recognition via year-end statements
00
29402142615 2000 WEB OF KNOWLEDGE - A FESTSCHRIFT IN HONOR OF EUGENE GARFIELD ():301-319
van Raan AFJ
The pandora's box of citation analysis: Measuring scientific excellence - The last evil?
10
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
29415142201 1998 LEARNED PUBLISHING 11(3):185-191
van Rooyen S
A critical examination of the peer review process
12
29428152734 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(2):85-91
van Rooyen S
The evaluation of peer-review quality
11
29434142350 1999 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 52(7):625-629
van Rooyen S; Black N; Godlee F
Development of the Review Quality Instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts
1116
29445112296 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7175):23-27
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Black N; Smith R
Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial
2227
29459122143 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):234-237
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review - A randomized trial
3142
294612152356 1999 JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE 14(10):622-624
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review
33
29470102514 2000 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE 12(3):239-242
Van Weert C
Developments in professional quality assurance towards quality improvement: some examples of peer review in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom
46
2948001362 1993 JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE 85(20):1632-1633
VANCHIERI C
PEER-REVIEW PUT TO THE TEST - CREDIBILITY AT STAKE
22
2949001990 1997 JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE 89(21):1568-1569
Vanchieri C
''Outing'' peer review: Medical editors scrutinize the value of secrecy
11
29500121462 1994 HIGHER EDUCATION 28(1):59-83
VANDEKAA DJ
PICKING THE WINNERS BY CONSENSUS - GRANT-GIVING PRACTICE IN THE NETHERLANDS
12
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2951001495 1994 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 47(7):821-822
VANDENBROUCKE JP
CAN THE QUALITY OF PEER-REVIEW BE MEASURED - COMMENT
13
295200935 1990 CIVIL ENGINEERING 60(4):38-38
VANDEPITTE D
PEER-REVIEW EUROPEAN STYLE
00
29531151451 1994 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY 56(1):1-7
VANHEMEL OJS; ELFERINKSTINKENS PM; BRAND R
HOW TO COMPARE AND REPORT DEPARTMENT SPECIFIC MORTALITY-RATES FOR PEER-REVIEW USING THE PERINATAL DATABASE OF THE NETHERLANDS
26
29540151721 1995 SERIALS LIBRARIAN 27(1):45-58
VanHooydonk G
Cost and citation data for 5399 scientific journals in connection with journal price-setting, copyright laws and the use of bibliometric data for project review
05
29550241664 1995 JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH 26(1):19-29
VANNOY M
TOWARD A SYSTEMATIC-APPROACH TO SAFETY IN THE COMMERCIAL FISHING INDUSTRY
06
29563251879 1996 SCIENTOMETRICS 36(3):397-420
vanRaan AFJ
Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises
543
295702493 1983 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 64(3):80-80
VANRENSBURG LJ
PEER-REVIEW
00
29580261177 1992 ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION 73(8):752-757
VARNEY JM; OKAMOTO GA; GOEBERT DA
HOSPITALIZATIONS FOR HIP-FRACTURES AMONG ELDERLY PERSONS IN HAWAII, 1986-1990
04
295900499 1984 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 187(APR):12-CINF
VASTA BM; KISSMAN HM
TOXICOLOGY DATA-BANK (TDB) - PEER-REVIEW AUGMENTATION VIA COMPUTER CONFERENCING
00
2960002850 2002 ASIST 2002: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 65TH ASIST ANNUAL MEETING, VOL 39, 2002 39():480-481
Vaughan KTL; Blixrud J; Hahn KL; Cohn D
The changing face of scientific communication: Developing new models for scholarly publishing in the electronic environment
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
29611602981 2002 MEDICAL CARE 40(12):1172-1185
Vaughn TE; McCoy KD; BootsMiller BJ; Woolson RF; Sorofman B; Tripp-Reimer T; Perlin J; Doebbeling BN
Organizational predictors of adherence to ambulatory care screening guidelines
01
29620122501 2000 ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE 57(3):677-681
Vecchione M; Mickevich WF; Fauchald K; Collette BB; Williams AB; Munroe TA; Young RE
Importance of assessing taxonomic adequacy in determining fishing effects on marine biodiversity
02
29630262998 2002 PHARMACOECONOMICS 20():21-30
Veenstra DL; Ramsey SD; Sullivan SD
A guideline for the use of pharmacoeconomic models of diabetes treatment in the US managed-care environment
03
29646341763 1996 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 19(3):538-&
Velmans M
Consciousness and the ''causal paradox'' - Response
01
29650183129 2003 INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL 40(3):281-290
Venables A; Summit R
Enhancing scientific essay writing using peer assessment
00
2966031340 1993 FASEB JOURNAL 7(14):1312-1319
VENER KJ; FEUER EJ; GORELIC L
A STATISTICAL-MODEL VALIDATING TRIAGE FOR THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - KEEPING THE COMPETITIVE APPLICATIONS IN THE REVIEW PIPELINE
34
296704200 1978 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING 78(12):2094-2096
VENGROSKI SM; SAARMANN L
PEER REVIEW IN QUALITY ASSURANCE
34
2968020247 1979 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 1(6179):1686-1688
VERBY JE; HOLDEN P; DAVIS RH
PEER-REVIEW OF CONSULTATIONS IN PRIMARY CARE - USE OF AUDIOVISUAL RECORDINGS
163
296900533 1984 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 65(21):863-864
VERCUEIL AE
PEER-REVIEW
11
29700262982 2002 MEDICAL EDUCATION 36(9):860-867
Verhoeven BH; Verwijnen GM; Muijtjens AMM; Scherpbier AJJA; van der Vleuten CPM
Panel expertise for an Angoff standard setting procedure in progress testing: item writers compared to recently graduated students
01
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2971001099 1991 JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS 14(7):409-415
VERNON H; MIOR S
THE NECK DISABILITY INDEX - A STUDY OF RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY
1109
297201092649 2001 BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION 28(8):725-735
Vesole DH; Simic A; Lazarus HM
Controversy in multiple myeloma transplants: tandem autotransplants and mini-allografts
04
297302675 1987 CHEST 92(5):958-958
VEVAINA JR
RISK-BENEFITS OF PEER-REVIEW
11
2974052434 2000 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 75(9):940-943
Viggiano TR; Shub C; Giere RW
The Mayo Clinic's Clinician-Educator Award: A program to encourage educational innovation and scholarship
01
29750371881 1996 SOCIOLOGIE DU TRAVAIL 38(3):331-&
Vilkas C
Scientific assessments and collective decisions: The Comite National de la Recherche Scientifique
01
29764102107 1998 DANISH MEDICAL BULLETIN 45(3):317-319
Vilstrup H; Sorensen HT; EASL Sci Comm
A comparative study of scientific evaluation of abstracts submitted to the 1995 European Association for the Study of the Liver Copenhagen Meeting
03
29779283283 2004 RESEARCH POLICY 33(3):443-454
Viner N; Powell P; Green R
Institutionalized biases in the award of research grants: a preliminary analysis revisiting the principle of accumulative advantage
00
29781112240 1998 SCIENTOMETRICS 41(1-2):185-200
Vinkler P
General performance indexes calculated for research institutes of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences based on scientometric indicators
114
29790231691 1995 OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 85(1):149-155
VINTZILEOS AM; NOCHIMSON DJ; GUZMAN ER; KNUPPEL RA; LAKE M; SCHIFRIN BS
INTRAPARTUM ELECTRONIC FETAL HEART-RATE MONITORING VERSUS INTERMITTENT AUSCULTATION - A METAANALYSIS
048
298002890 1989 NATURE 341(6240):275-275
VISVANATHAN KV
PEER-REVIEW
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
29810152506 2000 INFORMATION SECURITY AND CRYPTOLOGY - ICISC'99 1787():132-146
Viswanathan K; Boyd C; Dawson E
Secure selection protocols
00
2982072255 1998 TUMORI 84(2):101-103
Vitale V; Buconte G; Foppiano F; Franzone P; Guenzi M; Guglielmini C; Maione M; Paoli G
Introducing quality assurance in radiotherapy
00
29830032 1973 CANCER RESEARCH 33(4):919-919
VIVONA S; DOVANQUY D
COMPARABILITY OF AMERICAN-CANCER-SOCIETY AND NATIONAL-INSTITUTES-OF-HEALTH PEER REVIEW SYSTEMS
00
298413327 1981 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 125(4):335-336
VLADUTIU AO
PEER-REVIEW
01
298500295 1980 FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS 39(7):2349-2349
VOGEL FS
THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM - COMMENT
00
2986020362 1982 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE 8(1):45-68
VOLPER V
ANTITRUST IMPLICATIONS OF CHIROPRACTIC PEER-REVIEW COMMITTEES
00
29870322400 1999 PHARMACOECONOMICS 16(3):273-283
von Ferber L; Bausch J; Koster I; Schubert I; Ihle P
Pharmacotherapeutic circles results of an 18-month peer-review prescribing-improvement programme for general practitioners
14
298805418 1982 PHYSICS TODAY 35(3):15-&
VONHIPPEL F
PEER-REVIEW REVISITED - REPLY
00
2989002870 2002 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 45(1):4-4
Waddell JP
Peer review
01
2990002011 1997 NATURE 387(6634):642-642
Wadman M
'No change' while NIH revises peer review
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2991002213 1998 NATURE 391(6669):725-725
Wadman M
NIH peer-review revision panel is named
00
2992121749 1996 ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 28(1):75-77
Waeckerle JF; Callaham ML
Medical journals and the science of peer review: Raising the standard
22
29930213111 2003 CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION 19(3):149-154
Wager E; Field EA; Grossman L
Good publication practice for pharmaceutical companies
06
29947192737 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(4):257-263
Wager E; Jefferson T
Shortcomings of peer review in biomedical journals
12
299514543061 2003 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION 82(10):790-802
Wagner AK; Boninger ML; Levy C; Chan L; Gater D; Kirby RL
Issues in physical medicine and rehabilitation
00
2996001886 1996 TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY 24(5):645-645
Wagner BM
Controversies in pathology: Peer review
00
29970122709 2001 JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY 34():1-6
Wagner GS; Engblom H; Billgren T; Carlsson M; Hedstrom E; Ugander M; Selvester RHS; Arheden H; Eisenstein E; Kasper J; White R
A method for assembling a collaborative research team from multiple disciplines and academic centers to study the relationships between ECG estimation and MRI measurement of myocardial infarct size
00
29980252211 1998 NATURAL RESOURCES JOURNAL 38(4):635-649
Wagner J
That was then and this is now: An economist's wish list for the LLRW siting paradigm
01
2999071190 1992 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 146(5):723-728
WAHN M
CONTROLLING OVERSERVICING BY PHYSICIANS - REVIEW OF OFFICE PRACTICES IN MANITOBA
02
3000008 1971 ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY 104(4):343-&
WAISMAN M
PEER REVIEW
11

Page 30:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14