Missing Links? Citation Matrix | Graphs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
LOCK S, 1985, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED, ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66 INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686 CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE, BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231 COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC, |
Nodes: 3294
Authors: 5593,
Journals: 1065,
Outer References: 36825
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by first author.
Page 3: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
201 | 0 | 0 | 1699 1995 PHYSICS WORLD 8(4):25-25
BEREZIN AA PEER-REVIEW ONLINE - THE NONSENSE OF ANONYMITY | 0 | 0 |
202 | 1 | 1 | 2603 2000 SCIENTIST 14(8):6-6
Berezin AA From peer review to peer recommendation | 0 | 0 |
203 | 4 | 29 | 2686 2001 INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE REVIEWS 26(2):97-102
Berezin AA Discouragement of innovation by overcompetitive research funding | 0 | 0 |
204 | 0 | 2 | 2790 2001 SCIENTIST 15(15):6-6
Berezin AA Peer review: Open, not anonymous | 0 | 0 |
205 | 7 | 69 | 2769 2001 PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER 53(4):511-521
Berg LD Masculinism, emplacement, and positionality in peer review | 0 | 11 |
206 | 0 | 0 | 2691 2001 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH 13():S39-S43
Berger R; Billups K; Brock G; Broderick GA; Dhabuwala CB; Goldstein I; Hakim LS; Hellstrom W; Honig S; Levine LA; Lue T; Munarriz R; Montague DK; Mulcahy JJ; Nehra A; Rogers ZR; Rosen R; Seftel AD; Shabsigh R; Steers W; AFUD Though Leader Panel Evaluatio Grand Master Lectures - Lecture 3 - Report of the American Foundation for Urologic Disease (AFUD) thought leader panel for evaluation and treatment of priapism | 0 | 8 |
207 | 0 | 3 | 1978 1997 JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING 13(5):76-80
Bergeron HE History and findings of ACEC peer review program | 0 | 1 |
208 | 0 | 0 | 1466 1994 HOSPITALS & HEALTH NETWORKS 68(13):60-60
BERGMAN R REPORT CARDS ALONE WONT MAKE THE GRADE, SAYS PEER-REVIEW GROUP | 0 | 0 |
209 | 1 | 25 | 2685 2001 INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL 11(4):305-320
Bergquist M; Ljungberg J The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities | 0 | 3 |
210 | 1 | 70 | 2716 2001 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 16(2):99-112
Bergquist M; Ljungberg J; Lundh-Snis U Practising peer review in organizations: a qualifier for knowledge dissemination and legitimization | 0 | 0 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
211 | 0 | 28 | 3054 2003 ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA 82(9):780-788
Bergsjo P; Bakketeig LS; Langhoff-Roos J The development of perinatal audit: 20 years' experience | 0 | 0 |
212 | 7 | 15 | 1809 1996 ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 32(7):573-575
Beritic T Medical reviews and the importance of being a ''peer'' in science | 0 | 0 |
213 | 0 | 0 | 1579 1995 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 164(1):235-235
BERK RN; FRIEDMAN DP NEW CATEGORY OF PEER-REVIEW DECISION - REJECTION WITH OPPORTUNITY TO REVISE AND RESUBMIT | 0 | 1 |
214 | 0 | 0 | 1776 1996 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 155(3):318-320
Berkowitz P After slow start, protect to channel drug company funds to universities builds steam | 0 | 1 |
215 | 0 | 1 | 3065 2003 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 181(3):649-653
Berlin L Performance improvement and peer-review - Activities: Are they immune from legal discovery? | 0 | 0 |
216 | 0 | 0 | 179 1977 MARYLAND STATE MEDICAL JOURNAL 26(9):24-25
BERMAN JI MED-CHI COMMITTEES .1. PEER REVIEW COMMITTEE | 0 | 0 |
217 | 0 | 0 | 355 1981 SCIENCE 212(4501):1337-1338
BERNS MW ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
218 | 0 | 9 | 2502 2000 IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE 20(3):8-11
Bernstein DS Peer review | 0 | 0 |
219 | 0 | 0 | 216 1978 HOSPITALS 52(23):103-105
BERNSTEIN MJ OUTGOING PSRO HEAD SEES SOLID FUTURE FOR PEER REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
220 | 0 | 34 | 1252 1992 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 327(16):1135-1140
BERO LA; GALBRAITH A; RENNIE D THE PUBLICATION OF SPONSORED SYMPOSIUMS IN MEDICAL JOURNALS | 4 | 91 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
221 | 1 | 1 | 1730 1995 URBAN GEOGRAPHY 16(8):655-656
Berry BJL Peer review: Is it working? | 1 | 1 |
222 | 0 | 30 | 2189 1998 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION 5(4):382-389
Berry E; Parker-Jones C; Jones RG; Harkin PJR; Horsfall HO; Nicholls JA; Cook NJA Systematic assessment of World Wide Web materials for medical education: Online, cooperative peer review | 1 | 11 |
223 | 0 | 61 | 3033 2002 SLEEP 25(2):148-173
Berry RB; Parish JM; Hartse KM The use of auto-titrating continuous positive airway pressure for treatment of adult obstructive sleep apnea | 0 | 17 |
224 | 1 | 17 | 1738 1996 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ENOLOGY AND VITICULTURE 47(3):343-345
Bertolini L; Zambonelli C; Giudici P; Castellari L Higher alcohol production by cryotolerant Saccharomyces strains | 0 | 13 |
225 | 0 | 0 | 742 1988 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 195():1-CINF
BERTSCH CR PEER-REVIEW IN AMERICAN-CHEMICAL-SOCIETY JOURNALS | 0 | 0 |
226 | 0 | 1 | 569 1985 MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA 143(6):247-248
BEST J PEER-REVIEW - A WHIFF OF GRAPESHOT | 0 | 0 |
227 | 0 | 8 | 1146 1991 SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 35(5):386-388
BETTMAN JW ANTITRUST AND PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
228 | 1 | 24 | 3117 2003 FAMILY PRACTICE 20(4):443-451
Beyer M; Gerlach FM; Flies U; Grol R; Krol Z; Munck A; Olesen F; O'Riordan M; Seuntjens L; Szecsenyi J The development of quality circles/peer review groups as a method of quality improvement in Europe. Results of a survey in 26 European countries | 0 | 1 |
229 | 0 | 0 | 25 1973 AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN 7(4):29-29
BHASIN R PEER REVIEW PROGRESS | 0 | 0 |
230 | 0 | 9 | 2062 1998 ACTA CYTOLOGICA 42(4):865-868
Bhatia A; Singh N; Arora VK; Gupta K Prospective peer review in fine needle aspiration cytology - Another step toward quality assurance | 0 | 1 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
231 | 3 | 14 | 2496 2000 HEALTH CARE FINANCING REVIEW 22(1):69-74
Bhatia AJ; Blackstock S; Nelson R; Ng TS Evolution of quality review programs for Medicare: Quality assurance to quality improvement | 0 | 0 |
232 | 0 | 9 | 2376 1999 LARYNGOSCOPE 109(4):640-644
Bhattacharyya N Peer review: Studying the major otolaryngology journals | 0 | 4 |
233 | 1 | 21 | 1448 1994 DISPUTE RESOLUTION JOURNAL 49(1):61-66
BIALIK D; DILTS DA; SAMAVATI H HIGHER-EDUCATION - FERTILE GROUND FOR ADR | 0 | 0 |
234 | 0 | 13 | 1850 1996 OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 87(5):664-667
Bickell NA; Zdeb MS; Applegate MS; Roohan PJ; Siu AL Effect of external peer review on cesarean delivery rates: A statewide program | 0 | 5 |
235 | 0 | 0 | 848 1989 GEOLOGY 17(12):1067-1067
BICKFORD ME PEER-REVIEW - COMMENT | 0 | 0 |
236 | 0 | 30 | 834 1989 BUFFALO LAW REVIEW 37(3):831-861
BIEBUYCK VS ANTITRUST-LAW, IMMUNITY, AND MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW BOARDS | 0 | 1 |
237 | 15 | 91 | 986 1990 LIBRARY TRENDS 39(1-2):145-167
BIGGS M THE IMPACT OF PEER-REVIEW ON INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM | 2 | 7 |
238 | 5 | 36 | 3187 2003 MEDICAL DECISION MAKING 23(1):31-37
Bindels R; Hasman A; van Wersch JWJ; Pop PR; Winkens RAG The reliability of assessing the appropriateness of requested diagnostic tests | 0 | 1 |
239 | 0 | 8 | 2192 1998 LANCET 351():10-14
Bingham C Peer review on the Internet: a better class of conversation | 1 | 3 |
240 | 2 | 4 | 1836 1996 MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA 164(1):8-9
Bingham C; Coleman R Enter the Web: An experiment in electronic research peer review | 2 | 4 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
241 | 3 | 4 | 2206 1998 MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA 169(5):240-241
Bingham C; Van Der Weyden MB Peer review on the Internet: launching eMJA peer review study 2 | 0 | 2 |
242 | 6 | 11 | 2194 1998 LANCET 352(9126):441-445
Bingham CM; Higgins G; Coleman R; Van Der Weyden MB The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study | 7 | 18 |
243 | 0 | 0 | 2989 2002 MUSEUM NEWS 81(6):69-69
Binns J Peer review: Good for you, too (The work of peer reviewers is critical to the museum community) | 0 | 0 |
244 | 0 | 84 | 2805 2001 TOXICOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL HEALTH 17(5-10):163-175
Birak P; Yurk J; Adeshina F; Lorber M; Pollard K; Choudhury H; Kroner S Travis and Arms revisited: a second look at a widely used bioconcentration algorithm | 0 | 1 |
245 | 0 | 0 | 1583 1995 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 169(1):187-187
BIRBIGLIA VP MEDICAL AND SURGICAL PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
246 | 0 | 30 | 737 1987 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW 61(1):183-214
BIRICIK SN RECONCILING SECTION 1157, ELAM, AND WEST-COVINA-HOSPITAL - IS THE SANCTITY OF THE HOSPITAL PEER-REVIEW COMMITTEE SALVAGEABLE | 0 | 0 |
247 | 0 | 0 | 354 1981 SCIENCE 212(4501):1337-1337
BIRNBAUM HK ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
248 | 0 | 101 | 2090 1998 BULLETIN DU CANCER 85(8):695-711
Biron P; Fuhrmann C; Escande MC; Blanc-Vincent MP; Crokaert F; Beal J; Bussy V; Lesimple T; Pottecher B; Raveneau J; Senet JM; Viot M Standards, options and recommendations (SOR) for the management of neutropenic cancer patients (excluding prolonged neutropenia) | 0 | 3 |
249 | 0 | 10 | 2056 1998 ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 5(12):1137-1138
Biros MH The power of words | 0 | 1 |
250 | 0 | 0 | 822 1988 WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN 16(4):458-462
BISSONETTE JA PEER-REVIEW - SOME SUGGESTIONS FROM OTHER DISCIPLINES | 0 | 1 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
251 | 0 | 0 | 1780 1996 CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS 74(16):2-2
Bizzigotti GO More on peer review | 0 | 0 |
252 | 3 | 328 | 1565 1994 TEXAS LAW REVIEW 72(4):715-802
BLACK B; AYALA FJ; SAFFRANBRINKS C SCIENCE AND THE LAW IN THE WAKE OF DAUBERT - A NEW SEARCH FOR SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE | 3 | 49 |
253 | 0 | 0 | 1148 1991 TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY 19(3):290-292
BLACK HE PEER-REVIEW IN TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY - SOME RECOMMENDATIONS | 0 | 3 |
254 | 0 | 0 | 1979 1997 JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS 16(1):R1-R2
Black JT Peer review - The editor's dilemma | 0 | 0 |
255 | 0 | 0 | 2541 2000 JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS 19(3):147-148
Black JT Peer review process revisited | 0 | 0 |
256 | 3 | 7 | 2142 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):231-233
Black N; van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Smith R; Evans S What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? | 30 | 40 |
257 | 0 | 1 | 100 1975 NEW YORK STATE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 75(5):746-748
BLANCATO LS PEER REVIEW AND ANESTHESIOLOGIST | 0 | 0 |
258 | 1 | 34 | 1101 1991 JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION 21(5):31-36
BLANCETT SS THE ETHICS OF WRITING AND PUBLISHING | 0 | 9 |
259 | 0 | 5 | 2626 2001 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 76(9):954-955
Bland C; Caelleigh A; Steinecke A Reviewer's etiquette | 1 | 1 |
260 | 1 | 5 | 540 1985 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING 85(11):1284-&
BLANTON NE; BOGNER MJ; COLLINS HL; FUTRELL JA; LAGINA S; ROLISON A PUTTING PEER-REVIEW INTO PRACTICE | 0 | 1 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
261 | 1 | 2 | 369 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):203-204
BLISSETT M PEER-REVIEW AND THE STRUCTURE OF KNOWLEDGE | 0 | 0 |
262 | 1 | 27 | 2646 2001 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 35(5):563-568
Bloch S; Walter G The Impact Factor: Time for change | 0 | 7 |
263 | 0 | 0 | 459 1983 HOSPITALS 57(18):31-31
BLOOM MZ PRO RULES CHANGE FOCUS OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
264 | 0 | 0 | 747 1988 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 195():6-CINF
BLOUNT HN PEER-REVIEW OF NATIONAL-SCIENCE-FOUNDATION GRANT PROPOSALS | 0 | 0 |
265 | 0 | 0 | 132 1976 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 294(1):29-30
BLUM JD LAW-MEDICINE NOTES - DUE PROCESS IN HOSPITAL PEER REVIEW | 0 | 1 |
266 | 0 | 9 | 778 1988 JOURNAL OF LEGAL EDUCATION 38(4):525-533
BLUM JD MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW | 2 | 2 |
267 | 0 | 22 | 2253 1998 TRANSFUSION 38(9):891-895
Blum LN; Allen JR; Genel M; Howe JP; Council Sci Affairs Amer Med Assoc Crossover use of donated blood for autologous transfusion: Report of the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association | 0 | 6 |
268 | 1 | 1 | 1129 1991 SCIENCE 251(4990):211-213
BLUME SS PEERLESS SCIENCE - PEER-REVIEW AND UNITED-STATES SCIENCE POLICY - CHUBIN,DE, HACKETT,EJ | 0 | 0 |
269 | 0 | 110 | 791 1988 LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS 51(2):8-92
BLUMSTEIN JF; SLOAN FA ANTITRUST AND HOSPITAL PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 3 |
270 | 0 | 0 | 2886 2002 CORTEX 38(3):419-420
Bock O The peer-review process: Accept, revise, or reject? | 0 | 0 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
271 | 0 | 0 | 390 1982 BIOSCIENCE 32(1):10-12
BODDE T EVALUATION OF PEER-REVIEW DRAWS MIXED REACTIONS | 1 | 1 |
272 | 0 | 1 | 1115 1991 NEW SCIENTIST 129(1755):3-3
BODEN M PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
273 | 0 | 0 | 223 1978 JOURNAL OF THE SOUTH CAROLINA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 74(4):185-189
BODIE UH; WILLIAMS B; DRENNEN J MEDICAL INSURANCE PEER REVIEW - PROGRESS AND PROBLEMS IN SOUTH-CAROLINA | 0 | 0 |
274 | 0 | 2 | 2573 2000 NATURE 407(6801):129-130
Bodner S; Paine C When peer review fails - Problems with a giant laser project. | 0 | 0 |
275 | 0 | 0 | 24 1972 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATION NS12(4):171-&
BOISSERE.VR CASE STUDY IN PEER REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
276 | 1 | 12 | 2432 2000 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 75(5):409-418
Bonazza J; Farrell PM; Albanese M; Kindig D Collaboration and peer review in medical schools' strategic planning | 0 | 2 |
277 | 0 | 7 | 162 1977 CLINICAL RESEARCH 25(5):297-305
BONDURANT S PEER REVIEW OF RESEARCH-PROJECT GRANTS BY NIH STUDY SECTIONS - REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL MEDICAL POLICY, AMERICAN-SOCIETY-FOR-CLINICAL-INVESTIGATION | 2 | 4 |
278 | 0 | 92 | 1197 1992 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 20(6):884-890
BONE RC PHOSPHOLIPIDS AND THEIR INHIBITORS - A CRITICAL-EVALUATION OF THEIR ROLE IN THE TREATMENT OF SEPSIS | 1 | 44 |
279 | 1 | 104 | 1198 1992 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 20(6):891-898
BONE RC INHIBITORS OF COMPLEMENT AND NEUTROPHILS - A CRITICAL-EVALUATION OF THEIR ROLE IN THE TREATMENT OF SEPSIS | 0 | 52 |
280 | 0 | 13 | 120 1976 COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY 17(1):195-201
BONSTEDT T; SMITH JJ ONE YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH PEER REVIEW IN A PSYCHIATRIC-HOSPITAL | 0 | 2 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
281 | 1 | 26 | 3042 2002 TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY 30(1):88-92
Boorman GA; Haseman JK; Waters MD; Hardisty JF; Sills RC Quality review procedures necessary for rodent pathology Databases and toxicogenomic studies: The National Toxicology Program experience | 0 | 4 |
282 | 1 | 6 | 640 1986 JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES 75(1):1-1
BOOTS SG THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF AUTHORS | 0 | 1 |
283 | 1 | 7 | 2623 2001 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 76(9):889-896
Bordage G Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: The strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports | 1 | 7 |
284 | 6 | 37 | 2624 2001 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 76(9):904-908
Bordage G; Caelleigh AS Introduction - A tool for reviewers: "Review criteria for research manuscripts" | 0 | 1 |
285 | 0 | 1 | 1517 1994 KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION 21(2):108-108
BORKO H GUARDIANS OF SCIENCE - FAIRNESS AND RELIABILITY OF THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - DANIEL,HD | 0 | 0 |
286 | 1 | 11 | 1041 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):138-138
BORNSTEIN RF THE PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A NEGLECTED ISSUE | 3 | 6 |
287 | 3 | 5 | 1507 1994 JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE 182(8):483-484
BORNSTEIN RF THE GATEKEEPERS OF PSYCHOLOGY - EVALUATION OF PEER-REVIEW BY CASE-HISTORY - HARCUM,ER, ROSEN,EF | 0 | 0 |
288 | 1 | 10 | 2881 2002 CORTEX 38(3):403-405
Bornstein RF Peer-review in neuropsychology: Can we increase effectiveness without sacrificing rigor? | 0 | 1 |
289 | 5 | 23 | 3190 2003 MEDICINA CLINICA 121(6):228-230
Bosch F; Guardiola E; Grp Trabajo Esteve Fdn Workshop 20 Abridged checklist for the evaluation of basic biomedical research papers | 0 | 0 |
290 | 1 | 1 | 534 1984 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 66(5):166-166
BOSCH JK PEER-REVIEW OF PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
# | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
291 | 0 | 0 | 665 1987 ACTA MEDICA SCANDINAVICA 221(1):1-2
BOTTIGER LE PEER-REVIEW - DISCUSSED BY AN EXPERT | 0 | 0 |
292 | 5 | 23 | 2358 1999 JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 246(2):127-131
Bottiger LE Printed medical journals - will they survive? | 0 | 3 |
293 | 0 | 1 | 415 1982 PHYSICS TODAY 35(3):11-13
BOUQUARD ML PEER-REVIEW REVISITED | 0 | 0 |
294 | 0 | 3 | 2298 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7191):1143-1143
Bourdillon P Dutch system of peer review is different and effective | 2 | 3 |
295 | 1 | 2 | 2301 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7200):1724-1724
Bourdillon P Dutch system of peer review is different and effective (vol 318, pg 1143, 1999) | 0 | 0 |
296 | 0 | 32 | 1185 1992 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 304(6829):740-743
BOURDILLON P; CAMM PR; COHEN A; DAVIES ER; ENNIS WP; EVANS KT; HACKING PM; LAVELLE MI; LAWS JW; MCNULTY MR; ROBERTS CJ; ROBERTS GM; ROW G; SUTHERLAND R; WILLIAMS JE INFLUENCE OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGISTS GUIDELINES ON HOSPITAL PRACTICE - A MULTICENTER STUDY | 0 | 9 |
297 | 0 | 14 | 1315 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6870):110-111
BOURDILLON P; DAVIES ER; ENNIS WP; EVANS KT; HACKING PM; LAWS JW; MCNULTY MR; ROBERTS CJ; ROBERTS GM; SUTHERLAND R INFLUENCE OF ROYAL-COLLEGE-OF-RADIOLOGISTS GUIDELINES ON REFERRAL FROM GENERAL-PRACTICE | 0 | 14 |
298 | 0 | 19 | 1170 1992 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 117(9):788-791
BOVBJERG RR MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - FOLKLORE, FACTS, AND THE FUTURE | 0 | 12 |
299 | 6 | 20 | 2717 2001 JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE 49(1):77-84
Bovier PA; Guillain H; Perneger TV Productivity of medical research in Switzerland | 0 | 0 |
300 | 0 | 0 | 87 1975 AMERICAN SCIENTIST 63(6):624-626
BOWERS R PEER REVIEW SYSTEM ON TRIAL | 2 | 4 |
Page 3: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
Generated by:
HistCite(Vlad).
Version: 2004.05.14