Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Thu Jun 24 16:13:00 2004
Papers found on a Topic Search of "Peer Review"
and papers citing Steve Lock's "A Difficult
Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine"
and these papers/books added:
LOCK S, 1985, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED,
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE,
BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231
COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC,

Nodes: 3294
Authors: 5593, Journals: 1065, Outer References: 36825
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by first author.
Page 20:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1901002731 2001 LANCET 358(9286):991-991
McLellan F
Peer-review meeting participants urge greater accountability
00
190200793 1988 MEDICAL TEACHER 10(1):69-73
MCLEOD PJ; TENENHOUSE A
PEER-REVIEW OF CLASS HANDOUTS
01
19030281 1974 PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 5(1):51-58
MCMILLAN JJ
PEER REVIEW AND PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR PSYCHOLOGISTS RENDERING PERSONAL HEALTH SERVICES
08
1904001090 1991 JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY 171(3):14-&
MCNAIRN WN
STANDARDS OVERLOAD AND PEER-REVIEW
00
1905001468 1994 INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED 25(4):251-254
MCNICHOLL BP
THE GOLDEN HOUR AND PREHOSPITAL TRAUMA CARE
018
1906714957 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1371-1376
MCNUTT RA; EVANS AT; FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON THE QUALITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
65104
190700978 1990 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE 41(3):214-215
MEADOW CT
EVALUATION OF SCIENTIFIC-INFORMATION - PEER-REVIEW AND THE IMPACT OF NEW INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
00
1908142939 2002 JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION 58(1):104-106
Meadows J
Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses
00
190904626 1986 HOSPITAL PRACTICE 21(7):13-14
MECCA MA
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - CAN PEER-REVIEW BE PROPHYLACTIC
00
19100141812 1996 JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 22(11):751-761
Meehan TP; Radford MJ; Vaccarino LV; Gottlieb LD; McGovernHughes B; Herman MV; Revkin JH; Therrien ML; Petrillo MK; Krumholz HM
A collaborative project in Connecticut to improve the care of patients with acute myocardial infarction
26
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
19111302633 2001 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 111(3):203-210
Meehan TP; Weingarten SR; Holmboe ES; Mathur D; Wang Y; Petrillo MK; Tu GS; Fine JM
A statewide initiative to improve the care of hospitalized pneumonia patients: The Connecticut pneumonia pathway project
010
19120101256 1992 OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 79(5):790-793
MEEKER CI
A CONSENSUS-BASED APPROACH TO PRACTICE PARAMETERS
06
1913052286 1999 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY 172(4):893-896
Mehta A; Dreyer KJ; Montgomery M; Wittenberg J
A World Wide Web Internet engine for collaborative entry and peer review of radiologic teaching files
111
19140782278 1999 AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL 137(4):603-611
Mehta RH; Bates ER
Coronary stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction
07
1915003169 2003 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY 41(6):376A-376A
Mehta RH; Montoye CK; Faul J; Nagle D; Kure J; Rai E; Fattal P; Amlani M; Sherrif S; Changhezi H; Skorcz S; Baker P; DeFranco A; Eagle KA; ACC GAP Steering Comm
Initial results of the guidelines applied in practice for improving quality of care patients with acute myocardial infarction: The Flint-Saginaw cooperative initiative of the American college of cardiology foundation, greater flint health coalition, and Michigan peer review organization
00
1916001204 1992 ENERGY AND BUILDINGS 19(1):75-78
MEIER A
HOW TO REVIEW A TECHNICAL PAPER
00
19170332272 1999 ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA 70():18-26
Meis-Kindblom JM; Bjerkehage B; Bohling T; Domanski H; Halvorsen TB; Larsson O; Lilleng P; Myhre-Jensen O; Stenwig E; Virolainen M; Willen H; Akerman M; Kindblom LG
Morphologic review of 1000 soft tissue sarcomas from the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group (SSG) Register - The peer-review committee experience
08
19180372526 2000 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 284(19):2495-2501
Meisel A; Snyder L; Quill T
Seven legal barriers to end-of-life care - Myths, realities, and grains of truth
030
1919012092 1998 BULLETIN OF THE HISTORY OF MEDICINE 72(1):172-174
Meldrum ML
A half century of peer review, 1946-1996.
00
192010162675 2001 FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL 7(6):521-527
Melero R; Lopez-Santovena F
Referees' attitudes toward open peer review and electronic transmission of papers
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1921033068 2003 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 58(4):285-288
Melia RP; Pledger C; Wilson R
Disability and rehabilitation research - Opportunities for participation, collaboration, and extramural funding for psychologists
03
1922001509 1994 JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY 23(1):1-5
MENDELSOHN M; CONRAD K
FACIAL PLASTIC-SURGERY DATABASE
00
19230291564 1994 TESOL QUARTERLY 28(4):745-769
MENDONCA CO; JOHNSON KE
PEER-REVIEW NEGOTIATIONS - REVISION ACTIVITIES IN ESL WRITING INSTRUCTION
110
19242302728 2001 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 91(4):210-218
Menz HB
Publication patterns and perceptions of the Australian podiatric medical faculty
12
192500219 1978 JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE 6(6):1301-1302
MERENSTEIN JH
TEACHING PEER REVIEW TO MEDICAL-STUDENTS
00
192612861 1989 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 262(14):1950-1951
MERRY MD
THE DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE EXTERNAL CIVILIAN PEER-REVIEW OF MEDICAL-CARE
00
192703807 1988 SCIENTIST 2(15):1-3
MERVIS J
NIH PEERS AT ITS OWN PEER-REVIEW PROCESS - AT LEAST 6 EXPERIMENTS ARE AIMED AT IMPROVING THE ODDS FOR INNOVATIVE, CROSS DISCIPLINARY, AND HIGH-RISK PROPOSALS
00
1928011004 1990 SCIENTIST 4(7):1-&
MERVIS J
NIH EYES UNPRECEDENTED SUPPORT OF RESEARCH IN SOVIET LABORATORY - WHAT HAPPENS WHEN AN EMINENT SOVIET SCIENTIST, BATTLING FOR REFORMS IN HIS OWN COUNTRY, MUST CONFRONT UNITED-STATES PEER-REVIEW
00
1929021132 1991 SCIENTIST 5(1):6-&
MERVIS J
NIH FINE-TUNES PEER-REVIEW TO CLARIFY LONG-TERM FUNDING
00
1930001133 1991 SCIENTIST 5(23):1-&
MERVIS J
FUNDING OF 2 SCIENCE LABS REVIVES PORK BARREL VS PEER-REVIEW DEBATE - CONTROVERSY OVER PROPRIETY IS REKINDLED AS NEW PHYSICS AND MARINE BIOTECH CENTERS MAKE THEIR RESPECTIVE MOVES TO GAIN FEDERAL ALLOCATIONS
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1931001371 1993 NATURE 363(6426):195-195
MERVIS J
UNITED-STATES-ARMY TO USE PEER-REVIEW IN BREAST-CANCER PROGRAM
12
1932002785 2001 SCIENCE 291(5513):2533-+
Mervis J
Peer review - NSF scores low on using own criteria
00
1933002235 1998 SCIENCE 279(5356):1471-+
Mervis J; Normile D
Managing science - Agencies embrace peer review to strengthen research base
00
1934012680 2001 HEALTH PHYSICS 81(6):670-677
Merwin SE; Moeller DW; Kennedy WE; Moeller MP
Application of the Supreme Court's Daubert criteria in radiation litigation
01
1935001394 1993 SCIENCE 259(5091):13-14
MESSIER R
PEER-REVIEW OR PERFORMANCE REVIEW
00
19362322208 1998 MILITARY MEDICINE 163(7):461-465
Meyer GS; Krakauer H
Validity of the Department of Defense Standard Inpatient Data Record for quality management and health services research
04
1937032773 2001 PSYCOLOQUY 12(19):art. no.-11
Meyer J
Scientific journals by and for scientists - Book review of Tenopir and King on electronic journals
00
193806307 1980 MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA 1(5):237-238
MEYERS DH
AUDIT OF PEER-REVIEW
00
193901103034 2002 SOCIOLOGICAL QUARTERLY 43(2):307-334
Miall CE; Miall AD
The Exxon Factor: The roles of corporate and academic science in the emergence and legitimation of a new global model of sequence stratigraphy
00
19401111690 1995 NURSING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA 30(2):197-210
MICHELI AJ; MODEST S
PEER-REVIEW
11
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1941042651 2001 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 323(7316):805-806
Michell AR
Blood pressure measurement - Single measurements would not withstand 21st century peer review
00
194231371634 1995 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS 76():217-221
MICHELS R
PEER-REVIEW
34
194300460 1983 HOSPITALS 57(22):28-28
MICKEL C
AHA, HCFA NEGOTIATE PEER-REVIEW PROGRAM
00
194400513 1984 HOSPITALS 58(1):30-30
MICKEL C
PEER-REVIEW LAGS - POLICY QUESTIONS RAISED
00
19453473180 2003 LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING 64(3):119-129
Milburn LAS; Brown RD; Mulley SJ; Hilts SG
Assessing academic contributions in landscape architecture
00
19460451429 1994 ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING 7(3):205-215
MILGRAM NN
ISRAEL AND THE GULF-WAR - THE MAJOR EVENTS AND SELECTED STUDIES
02
194700176 1977 JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH 56():B94-B94
MILGROM P; RATENER P; WEINSTEIN P; READ W; MORRISON K
VOLUNTEERING FOR DENTAL PEER REVIEW - DIFFERENCES BETWEEN VOLUNTEERS AND PRACTITIONERS AT LARGE
11
1948023218 1978 JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH 57(2):201-208
MILGROM P; RATENER P; WEINSTEIN P; READ W; MORRISON K
VOLUNTEERING IN DENTAL PEER REVIEW - DIFFERENCES BETWEEN VOLUNTEERS AND PRACTITIONERS AT LARGE
02
194900217 1978 JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH 57():328-328
MILGROM P; WEINSTEIN P; RATENER P; MORRISON K
REPORT OF A SUCCESSFUL EXPERIMENT IN PEER REVIEW - CHANGING DENTIST PERFORMANCE
00
1950115204 1978 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 68(4):394-401
MILGROM P; WEINSTEIN P; RATENER P; READ WA; MORRISON K
DENTAL EXAMINATIONS FOR QUALITY-CONTROL - PEER REVIEW VERSUS SELF-ASSESSMENT
07
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
195100177 1977 JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH 56():A177-A177
MILGROM P; WEINSTEIN P; READ W; MORRISON K; RATENER P
RECALL EXAMINATIONS FOR QUALITY-CONTROL - PEER REVIEW VERSUS SELF-ASSESSMENT
00
19520401884 1996 TEXAS LAW REVIEW 75(2):409-434
Miller BK
Defending the system: Application of the intraenterprise immunity doctrine in physician peer review antitrust cases
23
19530651997 1990 RESEARCH JOURNAL OF THE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION 62(5):700-737
MILLER CT; MAYER AS
GROUNDWATER - A REVIEW OF THE 1989 LITERATURE
01
195400172 1977 INTERNATIONAL SURGERY 62(11-1):581-582
MILLER DS
PEER REVIEW - IS IT EFFECTIVE
00
1955019780 1988 JOURNAL OF LEGAL EDUCATION 38(4):545-554
MILLER FH
TEACHING ANTITRUST TO HEALTH LAW STUDENTS - PEER-REVIEW AS A CASE-STUDY
00
19563332797 2001 SOCIAL PROBLEMS 48(1):93-110
Miller J; Perrucci R
Back stage at Social Problems: An analysis of the editorial decision process, 1993-1996
02
195700600 1986 ALABAMA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 23(1):53-57
MILLER JW
PEER-REVIEW IN A COMPETITIVE MARKET
00
19580460 1974 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 131(12):1367-1370
MILLER RR; BLACK GC; ERTEL PY; OGRAM GF
PSYCHIATRIC PEER REVIEW - OHIO SYSTEM
49
195909116 1976 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 66(3):278-283
MILLER WR; HURLEY SJ; WHARTON E
EXTERNAL PEER REVIEW OF SKILLED NURSING CARE IN MINNESOTA
16
19600172182 1998 JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH 77(1):45-49
Millili JJ; Philiponis VS; Nusbaum M
Predicting surgical outcome using Bayesian analysis
03
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
19610112252 1998 TOXICOLOGY 127(1-3):85-95
Mills A; Foureman GL
US EPA's IRIS pilot program: establishing IRIS as a centralized, peer-reviewed data base with agency consensus
01
1962032774 2001 PSYCOLOQUY 12(21):1-3
Mills ME
Authors of the world unite: Liberating academic content from publishers' restrictions - Book review of Tenopir & King on Electronic Journals
00
1963021693 1995 OPHTHALMOLOGY 102(3):369-370
MINCKLER D
PURE PREVIEW AND PEER-REVIEW - OPHTHALMOLOGY WORLD NEWS AND OPHTHALMOLOGY
00
196401062639 2001 ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY SCIENCE 31(1):108-118
Mintz PD; Mayers L; Avery N; Flanagan HL; Burks SG; Spotnitz WD
Review: Fibrin sealant: Clinical use and the development of the University of Virginia Tissue Adhesive Center
03
1965003205 2003 PHYSICS TODAY 56(11):11-11
Mira-Perez J
Ideas for improving peer review
00
19660152896 2002 DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL 36(4):831-837
Miranda GF; Ginestet J
The attitude of pharmaceutical industry research scientists to browsing and publishing on Internet preprint and e-print servers
00
19672212888 2002 CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 43(1):8-15
Misak A; Petrak J; Pecina M
Scientific biomedical journals in Croatia
16
196803738 1987 SRA-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATORS 18(4):17-23
MISHLER JM; ELLYSON EJ
INTERNAL GRANT MANAGEMENT - RESULTS OF A PILOT-STUDY TO ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF PROPOSALS BY USING EXTERNAL PEER-REVIEW
01
1969033165 2003 JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES 6(3):345-345
Misra
Ethics of peer-review publishing: Drug delivery to the central nervous system. A review. (vol 6, pg 252, 2003)
00
1970001516 1994 JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE 37(4):557-564
MITCHELL FL; THAL ER; WOLFERTH CC
AMERICAN-COLLEGE-OF-SURGEONS VERIFICATION CONSULTATION PROGRAM - ANALYSIS OF UNSUCCESSFUL VERIFICATION REVIEWS
27
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
19710083 1974 SURGERY GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS 138(5):760-760
MITCHELL JH
PROBLEMS WITH PEER REVIEW
00
197200220 1978 JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE 20(4):280-280
MITCHELL JH
PEER REVIEW AND OCCUPATIONAL-MEDICINE
00
197311397 1975 MEDICAL CARE 13(5):409-416
MITCHELL JH; HARDACRE JM; WENZEL FJ; LOHRENZ FN
CHOLECYSTECTOMY PEER REVIEW - MEASUREMENT OF 4 VARIABLES
015
19740271677 1995 MANAGEMENT LEARNING 26(3):353-366
MITCHELL VW; BAKEWELL C
LEARNING WITHOUT DOING - ENHANCING ORAL PRESENTATION SKILLS THROUGH PEER-REVIEW
01
197503378 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):227-228
MITROFF II
DESIGNING PEER-REVIEW FOR THE SUBJECTIVE AS WELL AS THE OBJECTIVE SIDE OF SCIENCE
01
1976761279 1979 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 9(2):199-232
MITROFF II; CHUBIN DE
PEER-REVIEW AT THE NSF - DIALECTICAL POLICY ANALYSIS
1330
19772483172 2003 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 54(11):989-1005
Mizzaro S
Quality control in scholarly publishing: A new proposal
00
19782462437 2000 ACTA CYTOLOGICA 44(4):496-507
Mody DR; Davey DD; Branca M; Raab SS; Schenck UG; Stanley MW; Wright RG; Arbyn M; Beccati D; Bishop JW; Collaco LM; Cramer SF; Fitzgerald P; Heinrich J; Jhala NC; Montanari G; Kapila K; Naryshkin S; Suprun HZ
Quality assurance and risk reduction guidelines
07
197914963 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 264(24):3142-3142
MOESER PJ
PEER-REVIEW
00
198002394 1982 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 285(6353):1501-1501
MOFFAT DB
PEER-REVIEW WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1981001947 1997 ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 23(6):749-750
Moghissi AA
Peer review
01
1982016851 1989 HEALTH PHYSICS 56(6):959-960
MOGHISSI AA; RAY DL
PEER-REVIEW AND SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS IN RADIATION CANCER ASSESSMENT
00
198301808 1988 SCIENTIST 2(16):14-14
MOKRASCH LC
PEER-REVIEW ETHICS
00
198401794 1988 PEDIATRICS 81(1):172-173
MOLLER JH
WHO SHOULD OR CAN PEER-REVIEW SUBSPECIALTY PROGRAMS
00
198506324 1981 BIOSCIENCE 31(6):421-421
MOMENT GB
RISK MONEY FOR RESEARCH AND THE PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM
04
1986452856 2002 BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2():-
Montgomery AA; Graham A; Evans PH; Fahey T
Inter-rater agreement in the scoring of abstracts submitted to a primary care research conference
02
19871573008 2002 PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS 117(3):291-298
Montini T; Mangurian C; Bero LA
Assessing the evidence submitted in the development of a workplace smoking regulation: The case of Maryland
01
19880062 1974 ARCHIVES OF SURGERY 108(4):397-398
MOORE FD
PEER REVIEW AND ALL THAT - 3 LITTLE WORDS
01
19890065 1974 CONNECTICUT MEDICINE 38(7):357-358
MOORE FD
PEER REVIEW AND ALL THAT - 3 LITTLE WORDS
00
1990002267 1999 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 217():U312-U312
Moore JW
Peer review and the Journal of Chemical Education.
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
19910142333 1999 INTERNATIONAL DENTAL JOURNAL 49(2):76-81
Moore R; Shiau YY
Dentistry in Taiwan, Republic of China: national health insurance reforms, illegal dentistry and plans for peer review quality control
00
19920443108 2003 CONTRACEPTION 67(2):115-132
Moos MK; Bartholomew NE; Lohr KN
Counseling in the clinical setting to prevent unintended pregnancy: an evidence-based research agenda
03
19935471661 1995 JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY 40(6):555-569
Morales ME; Maliszewski S; Greenlees M
In pursuit of excellence - Quality assurance, documentation, and peer review by home birth CNMs
01
1994011232 1992 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 18(3):160-160
MORAN G
ETHICAL QUESTIONS ABOUT PEER-REVIEW
00
1995051676 1995 LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH 17(1):90-92
MORAN G
GUARDIANS OF SCIENCE - FAIRNESS AND RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW - DANIEL,HD
11
19962212168 1998 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION ETHICS 7(2):19-29
Moran G
Peer review and academic paradigms - Referees and information ethics
00
19971231109 1991 LIBRARY TRENDS 40(2):338-356
MORAN G; MALLORY M
SOME ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION
03
199800351 1981 SCIENCE 212(4501):1337-1337
MORAWETZ H
ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW
00
199900850 1989 HEALTH AFFAIRS 8(2):175-178
MORFORD TG
FEDERAL EFFORTS TO IMPROVE PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS
00
200000881 1989 NATURE 339(6221):170-170
MORGAN GL
PEER-REVIEW
00

Page 20:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14