Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Thu Jun 24 16:12:58 2004
Papers found on a Topic Search of "Peer Review"
and papers citing Steve Lock's "A Difficult
Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine"
and these papers/books added:
LOCK S, 1985, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED,
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE,
BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231
COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC,

Nodes: 3294
Authors: 5593, Journals: 1065, Outer References: 36825
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by first author.
Page 12:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
11012652177 1998 JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY 14(5):559-566
Grimmett MR; Sulmasy DP
The call of the sirens: Ethically navigating the sea of nonvalidated therapies
06
1102219787 1988 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS 38(306):10-13
GROL R; MOKKINK H; SCHELLEVIS F
THE EFFECTS OF PEER-REVIEW IN GENERAL-PRACTICE
324
110300556 1985 FAMILY PRACTICE 2(4):219-224
GROL R; VANEIJK J; MESKER P; SCHELLEVIS F
AUDIT - A PROJECT ON PEER-REVIEW IN GENERAL-PRACTICE
24
11040131600 1995 BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE 45(399):548-552
GROL R; WENSING M
IMPLEMENTATION OF QUALITY ASSURANCE AND MEDICAL AUDIT - GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS PERCEIVED OBSTACLES AND REQUIREMENTS
017
11050016 1971 SCIENCE 173(3992):106-&
GROSS J
PEER REVIEW SYSTEM
00
1106001800 1996 IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY MAGAZINE 15(3):8-8
Gross L
Peer review: Another viewpoint
00
11070172826 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY 17(5):171-174
Gruber T; Rudnitsky B
Can we be certain of PRO accuracy and accountability? Inaccurate "report cards" generated by Medicare claims data as a marker for laboratory testing in diabetic patients
00
11082243053 2003 ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY 10(5):543-553
Grunewald M; Heckermann RA; Gebhard H; Lell M; Bautz WA
COMPARE Radiology: Creating an interactive Web-based training program for radiology with multimedia authoring software
00
110912922006 1997 MEDICINA CLINICA 108(12):460-471
Guallar E; Conde J; delaCal MA; MartinMoreno JM
A guide for evaluation of research projects in health sciences
12
11100262756 2001 NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY 133(3):269-289
Guan Y; Li F; Modarres M
Application of the integrated TH-PA method to the Westinghouse AP600 design
01
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
11110241951 1997 EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL 10(7):1530-1534
Guest JF; Morris A
Community-acquired pneumonia: The annual cost to the national health service in the UK
044
1112092630 2001 ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION 25(3):167-175
Guilford WH
Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing
01
111300405 1982 HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY 33(10):803-803
GUILLETTE W
EFFECTIVENESS OF PEER-REVIEW
00
11141261593 1995 ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH 26():S31-S39
Guiscafre H; Martinez H; Reyes H; PerezCuevas R; Castro R; Munoz O; Gutierrez G
From research to public health interventions .1. Impact of an educational strategy for physicians to improve treatment practices of common diseases
08
1115001807 1996 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INSECT MORPHOLOGY & EMBRYOLOGY 25(1-2):19-24
Gupta AP
The peer review process, multiple publications, and the overcrowded by-line: Roles of the editor, reviewer, and author
00
11161131820 1996 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 22(4):243-244
Gupta VK
Should intellectual property be disseminated by ''forwarding'' rejected letters without permission?
01
1117012990 2002 NATURE 416(6878):258-260
Gura T
Peer review, unmasked
59
1118133112 1975 SCIENCE 190(4219):1060-1096
GUSTAFSON T
CONTROVERSY OVER PEER REVIEW
422
111900820 1988 WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN 16(2):226-227
GUTHERY FS
PERSPECTIVES ON PEER-REVIEW
01
11200431521 1994 MEDICAL CARE 32(5):436-446
GUTIERREZ G; GUISCAFRE H; BRONFMAN M; WALSH J; MARTINEZ H; MUNOZ O
CHANGING PHYSICIAN PRESCRIBING PATTERNS - EVALUATION OF AN EDUCATIONAL STRATEGY FOR ACUTE DIARRHEA IN MEXICO-CITY
227
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1121002043 1997 SCIENTIST 11(21):1-&
Gwynne P
Electronic posting of dissertations produces publishing dilemmas
00
11220221902 1997 ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY 8(5):463-468
Gwyther S; Bolis G; Gore M; Huinink WT; Verweij J; Hudson IR; Despax R; JimenezLacave A
Experience with independent radiological review during a topotecan trial in ovarian cancer
113
1123002451 2000 ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY 11():126-126
Gwyther SJ; Neilsen OS; Judson IR; van Glabbeke M; Verweij J
Comparison of peer-review (PR) and independent radiologist (IR) review of claimed responders in a phase II study treating advanced soft tissue sarcoma of the adult with high dose ifosfamide. An EORTC study.
00
11241152454 2000 ANTI-CANCER DRUGS 11(6):433-437
Gwyther SJ; Nielsen OS; Judson IR; van Glabbeke M; Verweij J
Radiologist review versus group peer review of claimed responses in a phase II study on high-dose ifosfamide in advanced soft tissue sarcomas of the adult: a study of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group
01
11259321412 1993 TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY 20(1):28-32
HAAGA DAF
PEER-REVIEW OF TERM PAPERS IN GRADUATE PSYCHOLOGY COURSES
15
1126001652 1995 JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY 6(6):439-439
HABAL MB
THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS
00
1127111229 1992 JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION 63(3):343-344
HACKERMAN N
PEERLESS SCIENCE - PEER-REVIEW AND UNITED-STATES SCIENCE POLICY - CHUBIN,DE, HACKETT,EJ
00
1128133032 2002 SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 8(2):211-214
Hackett EJ
Four observations about "Six Domains of Research Ethics"
00
11290295 1975 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION 50(10):976-977
HADAMARD A; FINK S; DAUM SW; MICHEL RD
NEW TOOL FOR PROGRAM-EVALUATION - CONSULTANT PEER REVIEW
02
11302182473 2000 CANADIAN PSYCHOLOGY-PSYCHOLOGIE CANADIENNE 41(3):152-159
Hadjistavropoulos T; Bieling PJ
When reviews attack: Ethics, free speech, and the peer review process
02
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1131041490 1994 JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 20(10):539-547
HADORN DC; BAKER D
DEVELOPMENT OF THE AHCPR-SPONSORED HEART-FAILURE GUIDELINE - METHODOLOGIC AND PROCEDURAL ISSUES
111
11321392986 2002 MOUNT SINAI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 69(6):385-397
Hafferty FW
What medical students know about professionalism
01
11330481384 1993 OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 81(1):147-152
HAGAY Z; REECE EA; ROBERTS A; HOBBINS JC
ISOLATED FETAL PLEURAL EFFUSION - A PRENATAL MANAGEMENT DILEMMA
026
1134003050 2003 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 225():U542-U542
Hagen JP
Using lab-report grading rubrics with calibrated peer review.
00
113515967 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 264(24):3143-3143
HAGLEY MT
PEER-REVIEW AND THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
11
11360332234 1998 SAFETY SCIENCE 28(1):21-44
Hale AR; Heming BHJ; Smit K; Rodenburg FGT; van Leeuwen ND
Evaluating safety in the management of maintenance activities in the chemical process industry
00
1137022749 2001 NATURE 410(6830):739-739
Haley RW
Gulf syndrome research has passed peer review
01
11380143080 2003 BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY EDUCATION 31(2):115-118
Hall ML; Guth CA; Kohler SJ; Wolfson AJ
Advanced instrumentation projects for first-year biochemistry laboratory
00
11390131257 1992 OPERATIONS RESEARCH 40(6):1040-1052
HALL NG; HERSHEY JC; KESSLER LG; STOTTS RC
A MODEL FOR MAKING PROJECT FUNDING DECISIONS AT THE NATIONAL-CANCER-INSTITUTE
010
114001768 1988 GEOSCIENCE CANADA 15(2):163-163
HALLIWELL JE
NSERC PEER-REVIEW - A DELICATE BALANCE OR INCREASING ENTROPY
01
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1141112792 2001 SCIENTIST 15(23):6-6
Hallman G
Peer review
00
1142022540 2000 JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS 28(4):406-407
Halpern A
Evidence: Discovery and "medical peer review" committee privileges
00
11430102069 1998 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 53(12):1292-1297
Halpern DF; Smothergill DW; Allen M; Baker S; Baum C; Best D; Ferrari J; Geisinger KF; Gilden ER; Hester M; Keith-Spiegel P; Kierniesky NC; McGovern TV; McKeachie WJ; Prokasy WF; Szuchman LT; Vasta B; Weaver KA
Scholarship in psychology - A paradigm for the twenty-first century
012
11440181835 1996 MEDICAL CARE 34(3):MS55-MS68
Halpern J
The measurement of quality of care in the Veterans Health Administration
012
1145041893 1997 ACADEME-BULLETIN OF THE AAUP 83(3):14-19
Hamilton NW
Peer review - The Linchpin of academic freedom and tenure
00
11460152543 2000 JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY 243(2):415-422
Hamilton TF; Robison WL; Kehl S; Stoker AC; Conrado CL
The Marshall Islands radioassay quality assurance program: An overview
01
11470561426 1994 ANNALS OF SURGERY 219(3):281-290
HAMMERMEISTER KE; JOHNSON R; MARSHALL G; GROVER FL
CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT AND IMPROVEMENT IN QUALITY OF CARE - A MODEL FROM THE DEPARTMENT-OF-VETERANS-AFFAIRS CARDIAC-SURGERY
149
1148001505 1994 JOURNAL OF LABORATORY AND CLINICAL MEDICINE 124(2):146-148
HAMMERSCHMIDT DE
THE VAGARIES OF PEER-REVIEW - A NEW STUDY AND OUR EXPERIENCE
11
11490101665 1995 JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 27(1):3-11
Hammerschmidt DE; Gross AG
The problem of biomedical fraud: A model for retrospective and prospective action
02
1150061464 1994 HIGHER EDUCATION 28(1):119-127
HAMMOND LS; DEVINE SD
THE NEW-ZEALAND EXPERIENCE OF A COMPREHENSIVE FULLY COSTED SCIENCE FUNDING SYSTEM
01
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
11510232478 2000 COMPUTERS & EDUCATION 35(4):251-262
Hammond M
Communication within on-line forums: the opportunities, the constraints and the value of a communicative approach
06
1152001 1969 FDA PAPERS 3(9):4-&
HAMPSHIR.GD
NAS-NRC DRUG EFFICACY STUDY - PEER REVIEW
01
11530153044 2002 TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY 20(12):S39-S44
Hancock WS; Wu SL; Stanley RR; Gombocz EA
Publishing large proteome datasets: scientific policy meets emerging technologies
02
1154011065 1991 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 303(6800):433-433
HANCOCKS S
AUDIT AND PEER-REVIEW FOR DENTISTS
00
115500869 1989 JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH 68(9):1375-1375
HAND AR; DAWES C
CONFERENCE REPORT - 1ST INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATIONS, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, MAY 10-12, 1989
01
115600413 1982 MINNESOTA MEDICINE 65(12):759-760
HANDLER S
IS PEER-REVIEW EFFECTIVE
00
11570342999 2002 PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE 24(4):132-138
Hands D; Stephens M; Brown D
A systematic review of the clinical and economic impact of drug information services on patient outcome
00
1158001235 1992 JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS 5(1):125-131
HANIGAN WC; ANDERSON RJ
NASCIS-2 - COMMENTARY
010
1159182431 2000 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 75(2):174-176
Hanna E; Premi J; Turnbull J
Results of remedial continuing medical education in dyscompetent physicians
05
1160071238 1992 KNOWLEDGE-CREATION DIFFUSION UTILIZATION 13(4):471-478
HANNA JL
SATANIC VERSES IN ACADEMIC PUBLISHING - TRUTH, POLITICS, AND CONSEQUENCES - COMMENTARY
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1161001514 1994 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 204(9):1352-1353
HANNAH HW
PEER-REVIEW - PROS AND CONS
00
1162011498 1994 JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION 44(1):52-64
HANSEN KA
PUBLICATION PEER-REVIEW - AN ANNOTATED-BIBLIOGRAPHY - SPECK,BW
00
116311695 1987 JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES 32(3):581-583
HANZLICK R
PEER-REVIEW IN THE COURTROOM - DISCUSSION
00
1164002634 2001 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY 281(2):H467-H467
Harder DR
Electronic peer review: benefits outweigh the learning curve
00
1165110749 1988 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW 53(1):157-160
HARGENS LL
FURTHER EVIDENCE ON FIELD DIFFERENCES IN CONSENSUS FROM THE NSF PEER-REVIEW STUDIES - REPLY
05
1166216953 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1348-1352
HARGENS LL
VARIATION IN JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW SYSTEMS - POSSIBLE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
717
11675391008 1990 SCIENTOMETRICS 19(1-2):91-106
HARGENS LL; HERTING JR
NEGLECTED CONSIDERATIONS IN THE ANALYSIS OF AGREEMENT AMONG JOURNAL REFEREES
25
11680222762 2001 PALLIATIVE MEDICINE 15(1):49-54
Hargreaves PN; Peppiatt R
Is videotaping of consultations acceptable to patients attending a hospice day centre?
00
1169071659 1995 JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY 109(4):317-319
HARKNESS P; BROWN P; FOWLER S; GRANT H; TOPHAM J
A CONFIDENTIAL COMPARATIVE AUDIT OF STAPEDECTOMIES - RESULTS OF THE ROYAL-COLLEGE-OF-SURGEONS-OF-ENGLAND COMPARATIVE AUDIT OF ENT SURGERY 1994
08
1170081935 1997 CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY 22(2):147-151
Harkness P; Brown P; Fowler S; Topham J
A national audit of sinus surgery. Results of the Royal College of Surgeons of England comparative audit of ENT surgery
07
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
11710401956 1997 HUMAN RELATIONS 50(11):1427-1460
Harley S; Lee FS
Research selectivity, managerialism, and the academic labor process: The future of nonmainstream economics in UK universities
03
117206999 1990 SCIENCE 249(4972):972-973
HARLING OK
BORON NEUTRON-CAPTURE THERAPY - THE ROLE OF PEER-REVIEW
00
11730382080 1998 AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION 42(3):285-302
Harman G
Supporting quality research in institutions of higher education
00
117425318 1980 SCIENCE 208(4447):974-&
HARNAD S
PEER-REVIEW - AN EXPERIMENT
11
117525589 1985 SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES (52):55-62
HARNAD S
RATIONAL DISAGREEMENT IN PEER-REVIEW
00
117611647 1986 NATURE 322(6074):24-25
HARNAD S
A DIFFICULT BALANCE - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICINE - LOCK,S
35
11770151907 1997 ANTIQUITY 71(274):1042-1048
Harnad S
Learned inquiry and the Net: the role of peer review, peer commentary and copyright
22
11782222203 1998 LEARNED PUBLISHING 11(4):283-292
Harnad S
Learned inquiry and the Net: the role of peer review, peer commentary and copyright
02
1179001278 1992 TECHNOLOGY REVIEW 95(3):7-7
HARRIGAN TP
PEER-REVIEW RECONSIDERED
00
11800312442 2000 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY 15(6):241-250
Harrington C; Weinberg J; Merrill S; Newman J
Medicare beneficiary complaints about quality of care
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1181002562 2000 MATERIALS WORLD 8(5):57-57
Harris J
Peer review
00
11822121059 1991 BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER 64(2):315-320
HARRIS M; HARTLEY AL; BLAIR V; BIRCH JM; BANERJEE SS; FREEMONT AJ; MCCLURE J; MCWILLIAM LJ
SARCOMAS IN NORTH-WEST ENGLAND .1. HISTOPATHOLOGICAL PEER-REVIEW
228
11830192472 2000 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 163(9):1163-1166
Harris S; Buchinski B; Gryzbowski S; Janssen P; Mitchell GWE; Farquharson D
Induction of labour: a continuous quality improvement and peer review program to improve the quality of care
23
1184222657 2001 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 164(1):16-16
Harris S; Buchinski B; Grzybowski S; Janssen P; Mitchell GWE; Farquharson D
Induction of labour: a continuous quality improvement and peer review program to improve the quality of care (vol 163, pg 1163, 2000)
00
1185022975 2002 LIBRI 52(4):199-203
Harrison J
Going for gold
01
11863281180 1992 BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER 66(4):685-691
HARTLEY AL; BLAIR V; HARRIS M; BIRCH JM; BANERJEE SS; FREEMONT AJ; MCCLURE J; MCWILLIAM LJ
SARCOMAS IN NORTH-WEST ENGLAND .3. SURVIVAL
05
11870162940 2002 JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH 56(8):563-568
Hartley AM; Griffiths RK; Saunders KL
An evaluation of clinical governance in the public health departments of the West Midlands Region
00
1188091819 1996 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE 22(5):349-356
Hartley J; Sydes M; Blurton A
Obtaining information accurately and quickly: Are structured abstracts more efficient?
014
11892121009 1990 SCIENTOMETRICS 19(5-6):419-425
HARTMANN I; NEIDHARDT F
PEER-REVIEW AT THE DEUTSCHE-FORSCHUNGSGEMEINSCHAFT
58
1190001446 1994 DIABETOLOGIA 37():A176-A176
HARTMANN P; BOTT U; GRUSSER M; KRONSBEIN P; JORGENS V
EFFECTS OF PEER-REVIEW GROUPS ON DOCUMENTATION OF DIABETES-RELATED PATIENT DATA IN PHYSICIANS PRACTICE - RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE CONTROLLED-STUDY
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
119101549 1985 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 290(6486):1984-1985
HARTNELL GG
PEER-REVIEW AT WORK
01
11921111344 1993 HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 27(6):765-777
HARTZ AJ; GOTTLIEB MS; KUHN EM; RIMM AA
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ADJUSTED HOSPITAL MORTALITY AND THE RESULTS OF PEER-REVIEW
022
11930511164 1992 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 82(12):1631-1640
HARTZ AJ; KUHN EM; KAYSER KL; PRYOR DP; GREEN R; RIMM AA
ASSESSING PROVIDERS OF CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION - A METHOD FOR PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS
027
1194092804 2001 TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES 61(2):201-210
Haseman JK; Bailer AJ; Kodell RL; Morris R; Portier K
Statistical issues in the analysis of low-dose endocrine disruptor data
06
11951462251 1998 TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY 26(3):428-441
Haseman JK; Hailey JR; Morris RW
Spontaneous neoplasm incidences in Fischer 344 rats and B6C3F(1) mice in two-year carcinogenicity studies: A National Toxicology Program update
251
1196018338 1981 JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW 6(1):136-158
HASTINGS DA
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS AND CONFIDENTIALITY - THE QUESTION OF PUBLIC-ACCESS TO MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW DATA THROUGH THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
01
119700468 1983 JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW 8(2):293-313
HASTINGS DA
LEGAL ISSUES RAISED BY PRIVATE REVIEW ACTIVITIES OF MEDICAL PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS
12
1198113284 1980 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 70(3):222-228
HASTINGS GE; SONNEBORN R; LEE GH; VICK L; SASMOR L
PEER-REVIEW CHECKLIST - REPRODUCIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF A METHOD FOR EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF AMBULATORY CARE
512
1199372148 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):273-274
Hatch CL; Goodman SN
Perceived value of providing peer reviewers with abstracts and preprints of related published and unpublished papers
11
1200002165 1998 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION ETHICS 7(2):3-3
Hauptman R
Problems with peer review
00

Page 12:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14