Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Thu Jun 24 16:13:12 2004
Papers found on a Topic Search of "Peer Review"
and papers citing Steve Lock's "A Difficult
Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine"
and these papers/books added:
LOCK S, 1985, DIFFICULT BALANCE ED,
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
CHUBIN DE, 1990, PEERLESS SCI PEER RE,
BLACK N, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P231
COLE S, 1978, PEER REV NATIONAL SC,

Nodes: 3294
Authors: 5593, Journals: 1065, Outer References: 36825
Collection span: 1969 - 2004
View: Overview. Sorted by year, source, volume, issue, page.
Page 11:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1001001001 1990 SCIENCE 250(4979):367-368
CHERFAS J
PEER-REVIEW - SOFTWARE FOR HARD CHOICES
11
1002011002 1990 SCIENCE 250(4981):620-620
HOLDEN C
PEER-REVIEW OF PEER-REVIEW
01
1003011003 1990 SCIENTIST 4(2):12-12
KRITCHEVSKY D
SENIOR SCIENTISTS COULD PLAY A KEY ROLE IN RESOLVING BIG PROBLEMS IN PEER-REVIEW
02
1004011004 1990 SCIENTIST 4(7):1-&
MERVIS J
NIH EYES UNPRECEDENTED SUPPORT OF RESEARCH IN SOVIET LABORATORY - WHAT HAPPENS WHEN AN EMINENT SOVIET SCIENTIST, BATTLING FOR REFORMS IN HIS OWN COUNTRY, MUST CONFRONT UNITED-STATES PEER-REVIEW
00
1005001005 1990 SCIENTIST 4(13):1-&
KING J
RULING COULD INHIBIT PEER-REVIEW CANDOR - REVIEWERS WILL HAVE TO THINK TWICE, NOW THAT TENURE EVALUATION LETTERS CAN BE USED AS EVIDENCE IN BIAS CASES
00
1006011006 1990 SCIENTIST 4(17):12-12
KONING RE
PEER-REVIEW
00
1007011007 1990 SCIENTIST 4(18):14-14
SHIMAZU M
PEER-REVIEW
00
10085391008 1990 SCIENTOMETRICS 19(1-2):91-106
HARGENS LL; HERTING JR
NEGLECTED CONSIDERATIONS IN THE ANALYSIS OF AGREEMENT AMONG JOURNAL REFEREES
25
10092121009 1990 SCIENTOMETRICS 19(5-6):419-425
HARTMANN I; NEIDHARDT F
PEER-REVIEW AT THE DEUTSCHE-FORSCHUNGSGEMEINSCHAFT
58
1010111010 1990 SOCIAL FORCES 69(2):634-634
HIGGINS AC
PEERLESS SCIENCE - PEER-REVIEW AND UNITED-STATES SCIENCE POLICY - CHUBIN,DE, HACKETT,EJ
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
10112211011 1990 SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE 31(8):891-905
LESLIE C
SCIENTIFIC RACISM - REFLECTIONS ON PEER-REVIEW, SCIENCE AND IDEOLOGY
217
10121281012 1990 SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE 31(8):905-909
RUSHTON JP
SCIENTIFIC RACISM - REFLECTIONS ON PEER-REVIEW, SCIENCE AND IDEOLOGY - COMMENTS
02
1013001013 1990 SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE 31(8):909-910
LOVEJOY CO
SCIENTIFIC RACISM - REFLECTIONS ON PEER-REVIEW, SCIENCE AND IDEOLOGY - COMMENTS
01
1014001014 1990 SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE 31(8):910-911
WILSON GD
SCIENTIFIC RACISM - REFLECTIONS ON PEER-REVIEW, SCIENCE AND IDEOLOGY - COMMENTS
01
1015011015 1990 SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE 31(8):911-912
MCEWAN PJM
SCIENTIFIC RACISM - REFLECTIONS ON PEER-REVIEW, SCIENCE AND IDEOLOGY - COMMENTS
02
1016001016 1990 SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE 31(8):912-912
LESLIE C
SCIENTIFIC RACISM - REFLECTIONS ON PEER-REVIEW, SCIENCE AND IDEOLOGY - REJOINDER
01
1017041017 1990 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 77(2):111-111
JONES CS
RESPONSIBILITY OF ANESTHETISTS - PEER-REVIEW
00
1018001018 1990 SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 78(6):380-380
LOUBSER JS
PEER-REVIEW - AN OPEN-LETTER TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL-PROFESSION
00
10190461019 1990 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW 51(2):463-492
GRAF JE
PATRICK V BURGET - HAS THE DEATH KNELL SOUNDED FOR STATE ACTION IMMUNITY IN PEER-REVIEW ANTITRUST SUITS
00
1020001020 1990 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW 51(4):1025-1059
SCIBETTA PL
RESTRUCTURING HOSPITAL-PHYSICIAN RELATIONS - PATIENT-CARE QUALITY DEPENDS ON THE HEALTH OF HOSPITAL PEER-REVIEW
01
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1021001021 1990 WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 153(5):520-522
RELMAN AS
PEER-REVIEW IN SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS - WHAT GOOD IS IT
711
10220101022 1991 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 66(11):705-708
YINGLING KW; HATTEMER C; ROUAN GW; LUKE RG
INTERNAL-MEDICINE RESIDENTS MONITORING OF THEIR COLLEAGUES MOONLIGHTING ACTIVITIES AT THE UNIVERSITY-OF-CINCINNATI
04
1023001023 1991 AMERICAN BIOTECHNOLOGY LABORATORY 9(1):4-&
LEVY GB
PEER-REVIEW
00
1024031024 1991 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS 14():S52-S55
DESCHENES L
DROLOXIFENE, A NEW ANTIESTROGEN, IN ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER - A DOUBLE-BLIND DOSE-FINDING STUDY
07
1025001025 1991 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC MEDICINE AND PATHOLOGY 12(3):272-273
WHITE L
PEER-REVIEW FOR MEDICAL EXAMINERS
00
10260141026 1991 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY 48(7):1531-1533
RAINVILLE EC; POSSIDENTE CJ; HARRY DJ
A PEER REVIEW-BASED QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM
11
102752051027 1991 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE 17(3):209-248
LIPTON JP; OCONNOR M; SALES BD
RETHINKING THE ADMISSIBILITY OF MEDICAL TREATISES AS EVIDENCE
02
10281251028 1991 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION 70(1):S161-S164
THOMAS JP; LAWRENCE TS
COMMON DEFICIENCIES OF NIDRR RESEARCH APPLICATIONS
00
1029011029 1991 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 115(3):219-222
SPRITZ N
OVERSIGHT OF PHYSICIANS CONDUCT BY STATE LICENSING AGENCIES - LESSONS FROM NEW-YORK ZION,LIBBY CASE
05
10300191030 1991 ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND 73(1):53-57
PHAIR IC; BARTON DJ; BARNES MR; ALLEN MJ
DEATHS FOLLOWING TRAUMA - AN AUDIT OF PERFORMANCE
17
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1031051031 1991 ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION 72(11):874-876
DAVIDOFF GN; DITUNNO JF; FINDLEY TW; GOLDBERG GF; HAZEL S
ELEMENTS OF ACADEMIC PRODUCTIVITY - A COMPARISON OF PM-AND-R UNITS VERSUS OTHER CLINICAL SCIENCE UNITS
07
1032031032 1991 AREA 23(4):361-364
HAY AM
A PEERS REVIEW OF A REVIEW OF PEER-REVIEW
00
1033001033 1991 AREA 23(4):364-366
GREGORY K
PEER-REVIEW - A REPORT TO THE ADVISORY-BOARD-FOR-THE-RESEARCH-COUNCILS FROM THE WORKING GROUP ON PEER-REVIEW, ABRC, NOVEMBER 1990
00
1034001034 1991 AREA 23(4):368-371
SUGDEN D
FUNDING UK RESEARCH - COMMENT ON THE REPORT TO THE ABRC FROM THE WORKING GROUP ON PEER-REVIEW
00
10350391035 1991 AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY 10(1):53-68
WALLACE WA
PEER-REVIEW FILINGS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS IN EVALUATING SELF-REGULATION
00
1036031036 1991 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 25(2):152-&
MORSTYN R
PEER-REVIEW OF PSYCHOTHERAPY
00
1037011037 1991 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 25(3):301-&
KAPLAN R
PEER-REVIEW
00
1038201821038 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):119-134
CICCHETTI DV
THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY INVESTIGATION
3580
1039001039 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):135-135
ADAMS KM
PEER-REVIEW - AN UNFLATTERING PICTURE
22
1040001040 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):137-137
BAILAR JC
RELIABILITY, FAIRNESS, OBJECTIVITY, AND OTHER INAPPROPRIATE GOALS IN PEER-REVIEW
911
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
10411111041 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):138-138
BORNSTEIN RF
THE PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A NEGLECTED ISSUE
36
1042191042 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):140-140
COLE S
CONSENSUS AND THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW EVALUATIONS
00
1043181043 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):141-141
COLMAN AM
UNRELIABLE PEER-REVIEW - CAUSES AND CURES OF HUMAN MISERY
03
1044001044 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):144-144
DELCOMYN F
PEER-REVIEW - EXPLICIT CRITERIA AND TRAINING CAN HELP
13
1045141045 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):146-146
FLETCHER JM
JOURNAL AVAILABILITY AND THE QUALITY OF PUBLISHED RESEARCH
22
1046001046 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):147-147
FULLER S
PEER-REVIEW IS NOT ENOUGH - EDITORS MUST WORK WITH LIBRARIANS TO ENSURE ACCESS TO RESEARCH
00
1047111047 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):149-149
GREENE R
IS THERE AN ALTERNATIVE TO PEER-REVIEW
00
1048091048 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):149-149
GORMAN ME
REPLICATION, RELIABILITY AND PEER-REVIEW - A CASE-STUDY
00
10490241049 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):154-155
LAMING D
WHY IS THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW SO LOW
22
1050141050 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):157-157
MAHONEY MJ
JUSTICE, EFFICIENCY, AND EPISTEMOLOGY IN THE PEER-REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPTS
22
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1051131051 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):157-157
MARSH HW; BALL S
REFLECTIONS ON THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS
44
1052141052 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):158-158
NELSON LD
THE PROCESS OF PEER-REVIEW - UNANSWERED QUESTIONS
22
1053031053 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):159-159
ROEDIGER HL
IS UNRELIABILITY IN PEER-REVIEW HARMFUL
34
10540101054 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):160-160
ROSENTHAL R
SOME INDEXES OF THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW
24
1055021055 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):164-164
TYRER P
CHAIRMANS ACTION - THE IMPORTANCE OF EXECUTIVE DECISIONS IN PEER-REVIEW
22
1056011056 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):166-166
ZENTALL TR
WHAT TO DO ABOUT PEER-REVIEW - IS THE CURE WORSE THAN THE DISEASE
11
10572631057 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):167-186
CICCHETTI DV
REFLECTIONS FROM THE PEER-REVIEW MIRROR
911
1058001058 1991 BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER 63(2):168-170
TWENTYMAN P; SELBY P
THE PROCESS OF PEER-REVIEW
13
10592121059 1991 BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER 64(2):315-320
HARRIS M; HARTLEY AL; BLAIR V; BIRCH JM; BANERJEE SS; FREEMONT AJ; MCCLURE J; MCWILLIAM LJ
SARCOMAS IN NORTH-WEST ENGLAND .1. HISTOPATHOLOGICAL PEER-REVIEW
228
1060001060 1991 BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE 41(350):380-381
JONES R; WILMOT J; FRY J
THE GENERAL-PRACTICE RESEARCH CLUB
02
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1061001061 1991 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 302(6774):431-431
SMITH R
PEER-REVIEW IS OK
11
10620121062 1991 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 302(6774):449-451
DONALDSON LJ; HILL PM
THE DOMICILIARY CONSULTATION SERVICE - TIME TO TAKE STOCK
015
1063141063 1991 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 302(6776):596-596
PEGG DE
PEER-REVIEW IS OK
00
1064111064 1991 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 302(6784):1038-1038
SMITH T; SMITH R
LOCK,STEPHEN RETIRES
00
1065011065 1991 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 303(6800):433-433
HANCOCKS S
AUDIT AND PEER-REVIEW FOR DENTISTS
00
1066071066 1991 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 303(6806):809-812
ROBERTS CJ
A MULTICENTER AUDIT OF HOSPITAL REFERRAL FOR RADIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION IN ENGLAND AND WALES
07
1067461067 1991 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS 50(1):1-3
REIDENBERG JW; REIDENBERG MM
REPORT OF A SURVEY OF SOME ASPECTS OF EDITORIAL-BOARD PEER-REVIEW AT CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY-AND-THERAPEUTICS
23
1068001068 1991 CLINICAL RESEARCH 39(2):A607-A607
RUBIN HR; ROGERS WH; KAHN KL; RUBENSTEIN LV; BROOK RH
HOW WELL DO PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS DETECT PROBLEMS IN HOSPITAL-CARE
00
10690121069 1991 COLLEGE COMPOSITION AND COMMUNICATION 42(2):184-199
HERRINGTON AJ; CADMAN D
PEER-REVIEW AND REVISING IN AN ANTHROPOLOGY COURSE - LESSONS FOR LEARNING
27
1070111070 1991 CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY-A JOURNAL OF REVIEWS 20(4):603-605
COLE S
PEERLESS SCIENCE - PEER-REVIEW AND UNITED-STATES SCIENCE POLICY - CHUBIN,DE, HACKETT,EJ
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1071001071 1991 CRYO-LETTERS 12(5):253-254
FRANKS F
THEORY, PRACTICE AND MALPRACTICE - PEER-REVIEW
00
1072001072 1991 CRYO-LETTERS 12(6):315-317
FRANKS F
PEER-REVIEW AS A TOOL IN FUNDING POLITICS - REQUIEM FOR CRYOBIOLOGY
01
1073071073 1991 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 96():53-56
DEARFIELD KL; QUEST JA; WHITING RJ; STACK HF; WATERS MD
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE UNITED-STATES EPAS OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS TOXICITY INFORMATION DATABASES
04
10740571074 1991 EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS 3(1):51-66
SEN A; WALLACE WA
AN EXPERT SYSTEMS ASSISTANCE TO INTERNAL AUDIT DEPARTMENT EVALUATION
00
1075011075 1991 FASEB JOURNAL 5(1):116-116
RAUB WF
AGE-DISCRIMINATION IN NIH PEER-REVIEW
00
10762101076 1991 FASEB JOURNAL 5(9):2313-2314
FORSDYKE DR
BICAMERAL GRANT REVIEW - AN ALTERNATIVE TO CONVENTIONAL PEER-REVIEW
44
1077001077 1991 FLUORIDE 24(3):85-89
CARTON RJ
NATIONAL TOXICOLOGY PROGRAM - CRITIQUE OF PEER-REVIEW DRAFT REPORT
03
1078081078 1991 GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY 37(6):597-599
MAI HD; SANOWSKI RA; WARING JP
IMPROVED PATIENT-CARE USING THE A/S/G/E GUIDELINES ON QUALITY ASSURANCE - A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE-STUDY
013
1079001079 1991 GERIATRICS 46(12):11-12
BUTLER RN
AUTOPSY - THE FINAL PEER-REVIEW
00
10800231080 1991 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT 38(3):191-201
KEENEY RL; VONWINTERFELDT D
ELICITING PROBABILITIES FROM EXPERTS IN COMPLEX TECHNICAL PROBLEMS
135
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
10819191081 1991 INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 12(1):11-13
HEPKER RR
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY - THE FORMAL REVIEW PROCESS
00
1082071082 1991 INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT 27(1):129-133
LIPETZ BA
IMPLICATIONS OF NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR THE REVIEWING PROCESS
00
1083001083 1991 INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED 22(5):353-356
PHAIR IC; BARTON DJ; ALLEN MJ; BARNES MR
PREVENTABLE DEATHS AFTER HEAD-INJURY - A CLINICAL AUDIT OF PERFORMANCE
05
10840181084 1991 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIO-MEDICAL COMPUTING 29(2):119-131
STOODLEY MA; SIKORSKI JM
OASYS - A COMPUTERIZED AUDITING SYSTEM FOR ORTHOPEDIC-SURGERY
01
1085111085 1991 ISIS 82(314):711-712
OVERMANN RJ
PEERLESS SCIENCE - PEER-REVIEW AND UNITED-STATES SCIENCE POLICY - CHUBIN,DE, HACKETT,EJ
00
10860131086 1991 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 265(1):74-77
STERN RS; BOUDREAUX C; ARNDT KA
DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY AND APPROPRIATENESS OF CARE FOR SEBORRHEIC KERATOSES - A PILOT-STUDY OF AN APPROACH TO QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR CUTANEOUS SURGERY
031
10870341087 1991 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 265(6):752-755
GELLHORN A
PERIODIC PHYSICIAN RECREDENTIALING
318
10881321088 1991 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 265(10):1265-1270
KELLIE SE; KELLY JT
MEDICARE PEER-REVIEW ORGANIZATION PREPROCEDURE REVIEW CRITERIA - AN ANALYSIS OF CRITERIA FOR 3 PROCEDURES
422
10891401089 1991 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 265(15):1977-1981
SANAZARO PJ; MILLS DH
A CRITIQUE OF THE USE OF GENERIC SCREENING IN QUALITY ASSESSMENT
450
1090001090 1991 JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY 171(3):14-&
MCNAIRN WN
STANDARDS OVERLOAD AND PEER-REVIEW
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1091001091 1991 JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY 171(3):16-16
CHENOK PB
STANDARDS OVERLOAD AND PEER-REVIEW - REPLY
00
1092001092 1991 JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY 17(5):541-541
OBSTBAUM SA
IS THERE A LIMIT TO THE VALIDITY OF PEER-REVIEW
00
10936291093 1991 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 6(3):193-195
BRUMBACK RA
PUBLISHING IN BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS - THE SYSTEM IN REVIEW
12
1094001094 1991 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 44():S131-S134
ANDREWS JS
DOES GOOD PEER-REVIEW ASSURE GOOD EPIDEMIOLOGY
01
10951401095 1991 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 44(1):91-98
OXMAN AD; GUYATT GH; SINGER J; GOLDSMITH CH; HUTCHISON BG; MILNER RA; STREINER DL
AGREEMENT AMONG REVIEWERS OF REVIEW ARTICLES
1764
1096121096 1991 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 44(4-5):339-341
FEINSTEIN AR
CONSTRUCTION, CONSENT, AND CONDEMNATION IN RESEARCH ON PEER-REVIEW
26
1097291097 1991 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 44(4-5):343-345
KEMPER KJ
PRIDE AND PREJUDICE IN PEER-REVIEW
48
10981271098 1991 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 44(11):1271-1278
OXMAN AD; GUYATT GH
VALIDATION OF AN INDEX OF THE QUALITY OF REVIEW ARTICLES
578
1099001099 1991 JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS 14(7):409-415
VERNON H; MIOR S
THE NECK DISABILITY INDEX - A STUDY OF RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY
1109
1100281100 1991 JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE 179(6):307-308
BRODY EB
A DIFFICULT BALANCE - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICINE - LOCK,S
00

Page 11:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14