Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Fri Jun 25 11:07:19 2004
Papers Citing "A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine"
and these papers added:
PETERS DP, 1982, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V5, P187
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
BAILAR JC, 1985, NEW ENGL J MED, V312, P654
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
HORROBIN DF, 1990, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V263, P1438
COLE S, 1981, SCIENCE, V214, P881
WILSON JD, 1978, J CLIN INVEST, V61, P1697
KASSIRER JP, 1994, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V272, P96
MAHONEY MJ, 1977, COGNITIVE THERAPY RE, V1, P161
LOCK S, 1990, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V263, P1341

Nodes: 216
Authors: 260, Journals: 121, Outer References: 4003
Collection span: 1967 - 2003
View: Overview. Sorted by NCR.
Page 2:  1  2  3
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
101416208 2002 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 9(2):105-108
Ludbrook J
Peer review of manuscripts
15
102416215 2003 REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES 20(5):671-678
Hoppin GH
How I review an original scientific paper
00
103215128 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):105-107
ABBY M; MASSEY MD; GALANDIUK S; POLK HC
PEER-REVIEW IS AN EFFECTIVE SCREENING PROCESS TO EVALUATE MEDICAL MANUSCRIPTS
317
104415150 1996 ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 32(7):573-575
Beritic T
Medical reviews and the importance of being a ''peer'' in science
00
105715181 1999 JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE 14(10):622-624
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review
03
106615193 2001 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 76(9):911-914
Shea JA; Caelleigh AS; Pangaro L; Steinecke A
Review process
11
107415196 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(2):85-91
van Rooyen S
The evaluation of peer-review quality
11
10861479 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1371-1376
MCNUTT RA; EVANS AT; FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON THE QUALITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
33104
109314127 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):96-97
KASSIRER JP; CAMPION EW
PEER-REVIEW - CRUDE AND UNDERSTUDIED, BUT INDISPENSABLE
1550
110514130 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):139-142
GILBERT JR; WILLIAMS ES; LUNDBERG GD
IS THERE GENDER BIAS IN JAMAS PEER-REVIEW PROCESS
525
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
111714132 1994 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION 93(5):1877-1880
SCHARSCHMIDT BF; DEAMICIS A; BACCHETTI P; HELD MJ
CHANCE, CONCURRENCE, AND CLUSTERING - ANALYSIS OF REVIEWERS RECOMMENDATIONS ON 1,000 SUBMISSIONS TO THE JOURNAL-OF-CLINICAL-INVESTIGATION
211
112514149 1996 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 84(3):359-366
Weller AC
Editorial peer review: A comparison of authors publishing in two groups of US medical journals
04
113414178 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7175):4-5
Smith R
Opening up BMJ peer review - A beginning that should lead to complete transparency
623
114114195 2001 HOSPITAL MEDICINE 62(5):301-304
Morris S
The future of journals: where will electronic publishing take us?
02
11511315 1986 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 293(6546):550-552
MARTIN B
BIAS IN AWARDING RESEARCH GRANTS
25
116313145 1996 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 19(3):534-&
Cicchetti DV
Peer review: Agreement and disagreement - Response
11
117413179 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7199):1637-1639
Delamothe T; Smith R
Moving beyond journals: the future arrives with a crash - New ways to disseminate research from NIH and the BMJ
018
11821211 1986 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 105(2):313-320
GARFIELD E
WHICH MEDICAL JOURNALS HAVE THE GREATEST IMPACT
579
11931226 1987 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 295(6599):656-659
NEWCOMBE RG
TOWARDS A REDUCTION IN PUBLICATION BIAS
038
12021253 1989 CURRENT CONTENTS 31():3-6
GARFIELD E
REQUIRING STANDARDS FOR SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS HAS COME OF AGE - INTRODUCTION TO MAKE SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS MORE RESPONSIVE - AND RESPONSIBLE BY HERXHEIMER,ANDREW (REPRINTED FROM THE SCIENTIST, VOL 3, PG 9, 1989)
01
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
12121258 1989 PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE 19(1):15-18
LLOYD GG; FLETCHER AE
CITATION TRENDS OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRIC JOURNALS
014
12231281 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1390-1391
SHARP DW
WHAT CAN AND SHOULD BE DONE TO REDUCE PUBLICATION BIAS - THE PERSPECTIVE OF AN EDITOR
730
123612173 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):234-237
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review - A randomized trial
1142
12421128 1987 CURRENT CONTENTS (2):3-9
GARFIELD E
WHICH MEDICAL JOURNALS HAVE THE GREATEST IMPACT
00
12531138 1988 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 296(6621):556-560
SMITH R
PEERING INTO THE BOWELS OF THE MRC .2. REVIEW SYSTEMS
25
12621141 1988 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 297(6655):1000-1000
WHIMSTER WF
CONFERENCE PREVIEWS
01
12761170 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1317-1317
RENNIE D
EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION - THE 1ST-INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS
1448
128311103 1992 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 116(11):951-952
FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
PHARMACEUTICAL ADVERTISEMENTS IN MEDICAL JOURNALS
226
129611139 1995 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 311(7009):826-826
SMITH R; RENNIE D
AND NOW, EVIDENCE BASED EDITING - THE 3RD CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW WILL BE IN PRAGUE IN SEPTEMBER 1997
17
130411175 1998 LANCET 352(9126):441-445
Bingham CM; Higgins G; Coleman R; Van Der Weyden MB
The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study
018
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
13111051 1989 COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES 50(3):277-286
OSBURN CB
THE STRUCTURING OF THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION-SYSTEM
010
13221056 1989 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 321(12):827-829
RELMAN AS; ANGELL M
HOW GOOD IS PEER-REVIEW
939
13361063 1990 ANNALS OF ALLERGY 65(4):243-243
SLY RM
BLINDING REVIEWERS IMPROVES PEER-REVIEW
02
134810109 1992 MEDICINA CLINICA 98(8):304-305
LOCK S
PEER-REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PAPERS
04
135610142 1995 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 10(3):255-256
RIGGS JE
PRIORITY, RIVALRY, AND PEER-REVIEW
25
136610160 1997 JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME 22A(5):767-771
Manske PR
A review of peer review
00
137310165 1998 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 128(1):66-68
Davidoff F
Masking, blinding, and peer review: The blind leading the blinded
315
138510170 1998 CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN 44():13-14
Reid AJ
Canadian family physician's peer reviewers - Unsung heros
01
139510207 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2759-2760
Rennie D
Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication
319
1403935 1988 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN 142(4):427-428
RENNIE D; KNOLL E
RESEARCH INTO EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - AN INVITATION TO A CONGRESS
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1411940 1988 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 297(6642):156-156
LOCK S
STRUCTURED ABSTRACTS - NOW REQUIRED FOR ALL PAPERS REPORTING CLINICAL-TRIALS
115
1425943 1988 DRUG INTELLIGENCE & CLINICAL PHARMACY 22(7-8):601-602
CLEARY JD; ALEXANDER B
BLIND VERSUS NONBLIND REVIEW - SURVEY OF SELECTED MEDICAL JOURNALS
413
1431962 1990 ANNALS OF ALLERGY 64(1):1-2
SLY RM
FACILITATION OF COMMUNICATION THROUGH UNIFORM REQUIREMENTS
13
1441964 1990 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 113(1):6-8
FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
A TRANSITION
02
1452973 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1338-1340
YANKAUER A
WHO ARE THE PEER REVIEWERS AND HOW MUCH DO THEY REVIEW
927
1462985 1990 LANCET 335(8680):19-19
[Anon]
ICONS AND INNOVATIONS
00
14719166 1998 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 172():193-193
Kerr A
Original publications
03
14829209 2002 JOURNAL OF PEACE RESEARCH 39(3):259-262
Gleditsch NP
Double-blind but more transparent
00
1493819 1986 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 256(17):2391-2392
RENNIE D
GUARDING THE GUARDIANS - A CONFERENCE ON EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW
1947
1501836 1988 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 109(3):181-181
RENNIE D; KNOLL E
INVESTIGATING PEER-REVIEW
48
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1512868 1990 CURRENT CONTENTS 40():7-11
ABT HA
THE USE OF PUBLICATION STUDIES TO AFFECT POLICIES AND ATTITUDES IN ASTRONOMY .2.
00
1521875 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1344-1347
WELLER AC
EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN UNITED-STATES MEDICAL JOURNALS
1032
1532897 1991 JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE 179(6):307-308
BRODY EB
A DIFFICULT BALANCE - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICINE - LOCK,S
00
15428104 1992 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 80(2):206-207
BYRD GD
PEER-REVIEW IN SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING - PAPERS FROM THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION - COUNCIL-OF-BIOL-EDITORS
00
15558111 1992 RADIOLOGY 182(1):287-288
DIRK L
ATTITUDINAL EXPRESSIONS AS A MEASURE OF REVIEWER FAIRNESS
00
15618184 1999 NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL 112(1099):416-416
Allison J; Clayton J
The Journal: 1997-1999
00
15738191 2000 MEDICINA CLINICA 115(11):418-422
Carles CP; Gomez-Gerique J; Millet VG; de Cabo JV; Martul ES; Hernandez JLM
Analysis of evaluation process in research projects submitted to the Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria, Spain
01
1581771 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1321-1322
KRONICK DA
PEER-REVIEW IN 18TH-CENTURY SCIENTIFIC JOURNALISM
1135
15917117 1994 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 118(1):104-105
STRAATSMA BR
INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS AND BENEFITS TO READERS
00
16017157 1996 TEKSTIL 45(12):624-626
Zajec J
Position and importance of the periodical Tekstil as a means of transferring data
02
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
16117200 2001 PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE 63(1):1-3
Dimsdale JE
Medical publishing: Remembrance of things past and intimations of the future
01
16217206 2002 CROP SCIENCE 42(2):660-660
Thornley JHM
Response to "Growth-maintenance component models are an inaccurate representation of plant respiration"
00
16337214 2003 LANCET 361(9351):10-11
Fletcher RH
Adverts in medical journals: caveat lector
05
1641620 1986 JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES 75(1):1-1
BOOTS SG
THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF AUTHORS
01
1651642 1988 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY 34(4):360-362
DAY RA
TRIALS AND TRIBULATIONS OF A JOURNAL EDITOR
00
1664669 1990 DICP-THE ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY 24(11):1117-1118
CLEARY JD; ALEXANDER B
BLIND VERSUS NONBLIND REVIEW - A REEVALUATION OF SELECTED MEDICAL JOURNALS
00
1671674 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1341-1343
LOCK S; SMITH J
WHAT DO PEER REVIEWERS DO
1134
1685694 1991 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS 50(1):1-3
REIDENBERG JW; REIDENBERG MM
REPORT OF A SURVEY OF SOME ASPECTS OF EDITORIAL-BOARD PEER-REVIEW AT CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY-AND-THERAPEUTICS
03
16926118 1994 ANNALS OF ALLERGY 72(3):183-183
SLY RM
STRUCTURED ABSTRACTS
00
17016158 1997 BIOMETRICS 53(2):715-719
Finney DJ
The responsible referee
02
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
171056 1981 SCIENCE 214(4523):881-886
COLE S; COLE JR; SIMON GA
CHANCE AND CONSENSUS IN PEER-REVIEW
20142
1721550 1989 CANADIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL-REVUE VETERINAIRE CANADIENNE 30(5):377-378
MAXIE G
EDITING AND THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS
01
1732599 1991 RADIOGRAPHICS 11(4):529-530
OLMSTED WW
PEER-REVIEW OF RADIOGRAPHICS MANUSCRIPTS - IS IT NEEDED
00
17435129 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):137-138
GARFUNKEL JM; ULSHEN MH; HAMRICK HJ; LAWSON EE
EFFECT OF INSTITUTIONAL PRESTIGE ON REVIEWERS RECOMMENDATIONS AND EDITORIAL DECISIONS
213
17545148 1996 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 313(7066):1185-1185
Wessely S; Brugha T; Cowen P; Smith L; Paykel S
Do authors know who refereed their paper? A questionnaire survey
04
17615163 1997 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 18(3):187-193
LaFollette MC
Editorial: An accelerated rate of change - Journal publishing
00
17715188 2000 CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH 46(1):1-13
Opthof T; Coronel R; Janse MJ
Where do our reviewers come from?
01
178143 1974 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 56(5):686-692
INGELFINGER FJ
PEER REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION
2776
1791412 1986 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 292(6521):646-646
MORGAN P
PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICAL JOURNALS
23
1802414 1986 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 292(6526):1017-1017
MOULD SM
ANALYSIS OF AUTHORSHIP
05
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1811416 1986 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 134(6):570-571
MORGAN PP
GENERAL MEDICAL JOURNALS - BECOMING LEARNED WITH LITTLE EFFORT
00
1821447 1988 SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 19(2):109-115
BANNER JM
PRESERVING THE INTEGRITY OF PEER-REVIEW
113
1833478 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1369-1371
GARFUNKEL JM; ULSHEN MH; HAMRICK HJ; LAWSON EE
PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED BY SECONDARY REVIEW OF ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPTS
528
1841492 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):146-146
FLETCHER JM
JOURNAL AVAILABILITY AND THE QUALITY OF PUBLISHED RESEARCH
12
18524138 1995 AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL 72(9):321-321
LUDBROOK J
WORDS ON NUMBERS
00
18624143 1995 LEARNED PUBLISHING 8(3):139-140
WILLIAMSON A
PEER-REVIEW RESEARCH - AN INVITATION TO ALPSP MEMBERS TO JOIN LOCKNET
01
18724152 1996 MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA 164(1):8-9
Bingham C; Coleman R
Enter the Web: An experiment in electronic research peer review
04
1883322 1986 LANCET 2(8516):1171-1171
[Anon]
PEERING INTO PEER-REVIEW
00
1891357 1989 PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 83(2):398-399
[Anon]
PEER-REVIEW FOR PUBLICATION
00
19023106 1992 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 267(21):2892-2892
RENNIE D; FLANAGIN A
PUBLICATION BIAS AND THE EDITORIAL PROCESS - REPLY
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
19113137 1995 ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD 72(3):268-270
LILLEYMAN JS
HOW TO WRITE A SCIENTIFIC PAPER - A ROUGH GUIDE TO GETTING PUBLISHED
02
19213154 1996 PREVENTIVE MEDICINE 25(2):102-104
Frank E
Editors' requests of peer reviewers: A study and a proposal
27
19313171 1998 CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN 44():15-16
Squires BP
Peer review under scrutiny - Report on the third International Congress in Prague, 1997
00
1941260 1989 SCIENTIST 3(6):9-&
HERXHEIMER A
MAKE SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS MORE RESPONSIVE - AND RESPONSIBLE
15
19512100 1991 SERIALS LIBRARIAN 19(3-4):91-94
DANCIK BP
THE IMPORTANCE OF PEER-REVIEW
01
19612124 1994 GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE 54(5):R3-R3
[Anon]
MAXIM OF THE UNKNOWN LISTENER
00
19712125 1994 GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE 54(12):R3-R3
[Anon]
MULTIPLE AUTHORS - WHO IS DOING WHAT
00
19812133 1994 OPHTHALMOLOGY 101(4):627-628
LICHTER PR
NO JUMP BALLS IN JOURNAL EDITING
00
19912203 2002 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 57(3):211-212
Lundberg GD
The publishing dilemma of the American Psychological Association
01
200119 1985 LANCET 2(8468):1340-1340
[Anon]
EDITORS DECISIONS
00

Page 2:  1  2  3
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14