Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Fri Jun 25 11:07:19 2004
Papers Citing "A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine"
and these papers added:
PETERS DP, 1982, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V5, P187
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
BAILAR JC, 1985, NEW ENGL J MED, V312, P654
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
HORROBIN DF, 1990, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V263, P1438
COLE S, 1981, SCIENCE, V214, P881
WILSON JD, 1978, J CLIN INVEST, V61, P1697
KASSIRER JP, 1994, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V272, P96
MAHONEY MJ, 1977, COGNITIVE THERAPY RE, V1, P161
LOCK S, 1990, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V263, P1341

Nodes: 216
Authors: 260, Journals: 121, Outer References: 4003
Collection span: 1967 - 2003
View: Overview. Sorted by LCR.
Page 1:  1  2  3
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
126195136 1995 ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 30():213-250
Dalton MS
Refereeing of scholarly works for primary publishing
14
22437140 1995 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS 76():217-221
MICHELS R
PEER-REVIEW
04
321318176 1998 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW 59(3):677-717
Noah L
Sanctifying scientific peer review: Publication as a proxy for regulatory decisionmaking
07
417106211 2003 ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION 8(1):75-96
Hojat M; Gonnella JS; Caelleigh AS
Impartial judgment by the "gatekeepers" of science: Fallibility and accountability in the peer review process
02
51541199 2001 PHARMACOTHERAPY 21(4):395-404
Sylvia LM; Herbel JL
Manuscript peer review - A guide for health care professionals
01
61464156 1996 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 18(1):3-28
Dirk L
From laboratory to scientific literature - The life and death of biomedical research results
11
71247116 1993 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH SECTION B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES 101():359-375
LOCK S
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN MEDICAL PUBLICATION
00
81237155 1996 PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE 26(5):883-886
Wessely S
What do we know about peer review?
26
91118291 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):119-134
CICCHETTI DV
THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY INVESTIGATION
1080
101136119 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):11-21
GOODMAN SN; BERLIN J; FLETCHER SW; FLETCHER RH
MANUSCRIPT QUALITY BEFORE AND AFTER PEER-REVIEW AND EDITING AT ANNALS OF INTERNAL-MEDICINE
1168
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
111022167 1998 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 173():110-113
Howard L; Wilkinson G
Peer review and editorial decision-making
17
12916121 1994 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 309(6948):143-144
SMITH R
PROMOTING RESEARCH INTO PEER-REVIEW
828
13933172 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):214-215
Rennie D
Peer review in Prague
211
1489186 1990 LIBRARY TRENDS 39(1-2):145-167
BIGGS M
THE IMPACT OF PEER-REVIEW ON INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM
07
1581995 1991 INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 12(1):11-13
HEPKER RR
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY - THE FORMAL REVIEW PROCESS
00
16810109 1992 MEDICINA CLINICA 98(8):304-305
LOCK S
PEER-REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PAPERS
04
17849162 1997 REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA 25(148):1946-1950
Shashok K
Shared responsibility in expert reviewing of original articles
01
18851180 1999 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY 21(3):412-421
Cicchetti DV
Guardians of science: Fairness and reliability of peer review.
00
19826204 2002 CORTEX 38(3):269-271
Della Sala S; Grafman J
Refereeing mortus est, vivat refereeing
00
2072996 1991 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 6(3):193-195
BRUMBACK RA
PUBLISHING IN BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS - THE SYSTEM IN REVIEW
12
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
21727113 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6893):1668-1672
GILLETT R; HARROW J
PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .1. MANAGEMENT WITHIN THE MEDICAL-RESEARCH-COUNCIL
212
22727114 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6893):1672-1675
GILLETT R; HARROW J
PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .2. IS MEDICAL-RESEARCH WELL-SERVED BY PEER-REVIEW
012
23724120 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):60-61
LOCK S
DOES EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW WORK
311
24747122 1994 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 150(8):1211-1216
HUSTON P
INFORMATION FOR PEER REVIEWERS
13
25720123 1994 CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH 28(8):1134-1139
FABIATO A
ANONYMITY OF REVIEWERS
313
26714132 1994 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION 93(5):1877-1880
SCHARSCHMIDT BF; DEAMICIS A; BACCHETTI P; HELD MJ
CHANCE, CONCURRENCE, AND CLUSTERING - ANALYSIS OF REVIEWERS RECOMMENDATIONS ON 1,000 SUBMISSIONS TO THE JOURNAL-OF-CLINICAL-INVESTIGATION
211
27792161 1997 MEDICINA CLINICA 108(12):460-471
Guallar E; Conde J; delaCal MA; MartinMoreno JM
A guide for evaluation of research projects in health sciences
02
28715181 1999 JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE 14(10):622-624
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review
03
29719213 2003 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 10(5):540-542
Ludbrook J
Peer review of biomedical manuscripts: an update
00
3064132 1987 JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY 2(2):165-176
MAHONEY MJ
SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION AND KNOWLEDGE POLITICS
128
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
3161063 1990 ANNALS OF ALLERGY 65(4):243-243
SLY RM
BLINDING REVIEWERS IMPROVES PEER-REVIEW
02
3261170 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1317-1317
RENNIE D
EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION - THE 1ST-INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS
1448
3361479 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1371-1376
MCNUTT RA; EVANS AT; FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON THE QUALITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
33104
34625131 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):143-146
FISHER M; FRIEDMAN SB; STRAUSS B
THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON ACCEPTANCE OF RESEARCH PAPERS BY PEER-REVIEW
1142
35611139 1995 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 311(7009):826-826
SMITH R; RENNIE D
AND NOW, EVIDENCE BASED EDITING - THE 3RD CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW WILL BE IN PRAGUE IN SEPTEMBER 1997
17
36610142 1995 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 10(3):255-256
RIGGS JE
PRIORITY, RIVALRY, AND PEER-REVIEW
25
37669151 1996 LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS 59(3):95-118
Jasanoff S
Research subpoenas and the sociology of knowledge
06
38610160 1997 JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME 22A(5):767-771
Manske PR
A review of peer review
00
39612173 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):234-237
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review - A randomized trial
1142
40615193 2001 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 76(9):911-914
Shea JA; Caelleigh AS; Pangaro L; Steinecke A
Review process
11
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
4157817 1986 CURRENT CONTENTS (32):3-12
GARFIELD E
REFEREEING AND PEER-REVIEW .2. THE RESEARCH ON REFEREEING AND ALTERNATIVES TO THE PRESENT SYSTEM
00
425943 1988 DRUG INTELLIGENCE & CLINICAL PHARMACY 22(7-8):601-602
CLEARY JD; ALEXANDER B
BLIND VERSUS NONBLIND REVIEW - SURVEY OF SELECTED MEDICAL JOURNALS
413
4353946 1988 R & D MANAGEMENT 18(4):333-340
POURIS A
PEER-REVIEW IN SCIENTIFICALLY SMALL COUNTRIES
03
4453988 1990 SCIENTOMETRICS 19(1-2):91-106
HARGENS LL; HERTING JR
NEGLECTED CONSIDERATIONS IN THE ANALYSIS OF AGREEMENT AMONG JOURNAL REFEREES
15
45520590 1991 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE 17(3):209-248
LIPTON JP; OCONNOR M; SALES BD
RETHINKING THE ADMISSIBILITY OF MEDICAL TREATISES AS EVIDENCE
02
465694 1991 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS 50(1):1-3
REIDENBERG JW; REIDENBERG MM
REPORT OF A SURVEY OF SOME ASPECTS OF EDITORIAL-BOARD PEER-REVIEW AT CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY-AND-THERAPEUTICS
03
4758111 1992 RADIOLOGY 182(1):287-288
DIRK L
ATTITUDINAL EXPRESSIONS AS A MEASURE OF REVIEWER FAIRNESS
00
48514130 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):139-142
GILBERT JR; WILLIAMS ES; LUNDBERG GD
IS THERE GENDER BIAS IN JAMAS PEER-REVIEW PROCESS
525
49514149 1996 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 84(3):359-366
Weller AC
Editorial peer review: A comparison of authors publishing in two groups of US medical journals
04
50516169 1998 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 86(3):421-422
Homan FM
Whither peer review: Prague '97
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
51510170 1998 CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN 44():13-14
Reid AJ
Canadian family physician's peer reviewers - Unsung heros
01
52525174 1998 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY 20(3):428-431
Cicchetti DV
Good science and good peer reviewing: Are they related?
00
53517183 1999 NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA 12(5):210-213
Das Sinha S; Sahni P; Nundy S
Does exchanging comments of Indian and non-Indian reviewers improve the quality of manuscript reviews?
02
54543185 1999 PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN 25(2):188-203
Petty RE; Fleming MA
The review process at PSPB: Correlates of interreviewer agreement and manuscript acceptance
02
55510207 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2759-2760
Rennie D
Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication
319
5642810 1985 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 312(10):654-657
BAILAR JC; PATTERSON K
JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW - THE NEED FOR A RESEARCH AGENDA
2963
5742027 1987 CHEST 91(2):252-255
ROBIN ED; BURKE CM
PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICAL JOURNALS
914
5844866 1990 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 301(6754):756-759
SMITH J
JOURNALOLOGY - OR WHAT EDITORS DO
26
594669 1990 DICP-THE ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY 24(11):1117-1118
CLEARY JD; ALEXANDER B
BLIND VERSUS NONBLIND REVIEW - A REEVALUATION OF SELECTED MEDICAL JOURNALS
00
6048872 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1323-1329
BURNHAM JC
THE EVOLUTION OF EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW
935
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
61424107 1992 JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 232(3):215-221
FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
MEDICAL JOURNALS AND SOCIETY - THREATS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
17
6245148 1996 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 313(7066):1185-1185
Wessely S; Brugha T; Cowen P; Smith L; Paykel S
Do authors know who refereed their paper? A questionnaire survey
04
63415150 1996 ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 32(7):573-575
Beritic T
Medical reviews and the importance of being a ''peer'' in science
00
64411175 1998 LANCET 352(9126):441-445
Bingham CM; Higgins G; Coleman R; Van Der Weyden MB
The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study
018
65414178 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7175):4-5
Smith R
Opening up BMJ peer review - A beginning that should lead to complete transparency
623
66413179 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7199):1637-1639
Delamothe T; Smith R
Moving beyond journals: the future arrives with a crash - New ways to disseminate research from NIH and the BMJ
018
67423182 1999 JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 246(2):127-131
Bottiger LE
Printed medical journals - will they survive?
03
68433187 1999 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 29(5):765-776
Dirk L
A measure of originality: The elements of science
01
69429190 2000 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY 53(1):1-2
Holzel H; van Diest PJ
The new millennium: Time for a change!
06
70437192 2001 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 76(9):904-908
Bordage G; Caelleigh AS
Introduction - A tool for reviewers: "Review criteria for research manuscripts"
01
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
71415196 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(2):85-91
van Rooyen S
The evaluation of peer-review quality
11
72416202 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 166(8):1019-1023
Hoppin FG
How I review an original scientific article
08
73416208 2002 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 9(2):105-108
Ludbrook J
Peer review of manuscripts
15
74416215 2003 REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES 20(5):671-678
Hoppin GH
How I review an original scientific paper
00
753607 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):187-195
PETERS DP; CECI SJ
PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNALS - THE FATE OF ACCEPTED, PUBLISHED ARTICLES, SUBMITTED AGAIN
37232
763819 1986 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 256(17):2391-2392
RENNIE D
GUARDING THE GUARDIANS - A CONFERENCE ON EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW
1947
7733421 1986 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE 79(11):639-645
SHEPHERD M
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE REDIVIVUS - CONCEPT AND COMMUNICATION
14
783322 1986 LANCET 2(8516):1171-1171
[Anon]
PEERING INTO PEER-REVIEW
00
7934125 1987 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW 52(5):631-642
BAKANIC V; MCPHAIL C; SIMON RJ
THE MANUSCRIPT REVIEW AND DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
433
8031226 1987 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 295(6599):656-659
NEWCOMBE RG
TOWARDS A REDUCTION IN PUBLICATION BIAS
038
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
813935 1988 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN 142(4):427-428
RENNIE D; KNOLL E
RESEARCH INTO EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - AN INVITATION TO A CONGRESS
00
8232537 1988 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 296(6620):484-488
SMITH R
RESEARCH POLICY - PEERING INTO THE BOWELS OF THE MRC .1. SETTING PRIORITIES
212
8331138 1988 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 296(6621):556-560
SMITH R
PEERING INTO THE BOWELS OF THE MRC .2. REVIEW SYSTEMS
25
8432739 1988 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 296(6624):774-777
SMITH R
RESEARCH POLICY - PROBLEMS WITH PEER-REVIEW AND ALTERNATIVES
717
8532354 1989 HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY 43(1):20-38
GILLETT R
RESEARCH PERFORMANCE INDICATORS BASED ON PEER-REVIEW - A CRITICAL ANALYSIS
012
8637261 1989 SCIENTOMETRICS 15(3-4):257-282
RICE RE; BORGMAN CL; BEDNARSKI D; HART PJ
JOURNAL-TO-JOURNAL CITATION DATA - ISSUES OF VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY
034
8739465 1990 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 113(4):317-325
FYE WB
MEDICAL AUTHORSHIP - TRADITIONS, TRENDS, AND TRIBULATIONS
234
8832167 1990 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 78(3):258-265
WELLER AC
EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - METHODOLOGY AND DATA-COLLECTION
01
893478 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1369-1371
GARFUNKEL JM; ULSHEN MH; HAMRICK HJ; LAWSON EE
PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED BY SECONDARY REVIEW OF ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPTS
528
9031281 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1390-1391
SHARP DW
WHAT CAN AND SHOULD BE DONE TO REDUCE PUBLICATION BIAS - THE PERSPECTIVE OF AN EDITOR
730
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
91320102 1992 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 116(11):912-919
WILKES MS; DOBLIN BH; SHAPIRO MF
PHARMACEUTICAL ADVERTISEMENTS IN LEADING MEDICAL JOURNALS - EXPERTS ASSESSMENTS
3116
92311103 1992 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 116(11):951-952
FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
PHARMACEUTICAL ADVERTISEMENTS IN MEDICAL JOURNALS
226
93320105 1992 DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT 117(48):1854-1858
ROTHMUND M
ENSURING QUALITY OF MEDICAL PUBLICATIONS
04
94327112 1993 ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION IN ENGLISH 32(2):234-238
DANIEL HD
AN EVALUATION OF THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS AT ANGEWANDTE-CHEMIE
38
95314127 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):96-97
KASSIRER JP; CAMPION EW
PEER-REVIEW - CRUDE AND UNDERSTUDIED, BUT INDISPENSABLE
1550
9635129 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):137-138
GARFUNKEL JM; ULSHEN MH; HAMRICK HJ; LAWSON EE
EFFECT OF INSTITUTIONAL PRESTIGE ON REVIEWERS RECOMMENDATIONS AND EDITORIAL DECISIONS
213
97317141 1995 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 10(3):175-176
BRUMBACK RA
JUNK SCIENCE - IS PEER-REVIEW THE ANSWER
02
98313145 1996 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 19(3):534-&
Cicchetti DV
Peer review: Agreement and disagreement - Response
11
99334146 1996 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 19(3):538-&
Velmans M
Consciousness and the ''causal paradox'' - Response
01
100326147 1996 BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE 46(406):268-270
Taylor RJ
Experts and evidence
01

Page 1:  1  2  3
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14