| Missing Links? Citation Matrix | Graphs | Glossary HistCite Guide About |
|
PETERS DP, 1982, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V5, P187 ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66 BAILAR JC, 1985, NEW ENGL J MED, V312, P654 INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686 HORROBIN DF, 1990, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V263, P1438 COLE S, 1981, SCIENCE, V214, P881 WILSON JD, 1978, J CLIN INVEST, V61, P1697 KASSIRER JP, 1994, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V272, P96 MAHONEY MJ, 1977, COGNITIVE THERAPY RE, V1, P161 LOCK S, 1990, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V263, P1341 |
Nodes: 216
Authors: 260,
Journals: 121,
Outer References: 4003
Collection span: 1967 - 2003
View: Overview. Sorted by LCR.
Page 1: 1 2 3
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | 195 | 136 1995 ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 30():213-250
Dalton MS Refereeing of scholarly works for primary publishing | 1 | 4 |
| 2 | 24 | 37 | 140 1995 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS 76():217-221
MICHELS R PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 4 |
| 3 | 21 | 318 | 176 1998 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW 59(3):677-717
Noah L Sanctifying scientific peer review: Publication as a proxy for regulatory decisionmaking | 0 | 7 |
| 4 | 17 | 106 | 211 2003 ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION 8(1):75-96
Hojat M; Gonnella JS; Caelleigh AS Impartial judgment by the "gatekeepers" of science: Fallibility and accountability in the peer review process | 0 | 2 |
| 5 | 15 | 41 | 199 2001 PHARMACOTHERAPY 21(4):395-404
Sylvia LM; Herbel JL Manuscript peer review - A guide for health care professionals | 0 | 1 |
| 6 | 14 | 64 | 156 1996 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 18(1):3-28
Dirk L From laboratory to scientific literature - The life and death of biomedical research results | 1 | 1 |
| 7 | 12 | 47 | 116 1993 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH SECTION B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES 101():359-375
LOCK S QUALITY ASSURANCE IN MEDICAL PUBLICATION | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 12 | 37 | 155 1996 PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE 26(5):883-886
Wessely S What do we know about peer review? | 2 | 6 |
| 9 | 11 | 182 | 91 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):119-134
CICCHETTI DV THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY INVESTIGATION | 10 | 80 |
| 10 | 11 | 36 | 119 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):11-21
GOODMAN SN; BERLIN J; FLETCHER SW; FLETCHER RH MANUSCRIPT QUALITY BEFORE AND AFTER PEER-REVIEW AND EDITING AT ANNALS OF INTERNAL-MEDICINE | 11 | 68 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 11 | 10 | 22 | 167 1998 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 173():110-113
Howard L; Wilkinson G Peer review and editorial decision-making | 1 | 7 |
| 12 | 9 | 16 | 121 1994 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 309(6948):143-144
SMITH R PROMOTING RESEARCH INTO PEER-REVIEW | 8 | 28 |
| 13 | 9 | 33 | 172 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):214-215
Rennie D Peer review in Prague | 2 | 11 |
| 14 | 8 | 91 | 86 1990 LIBRARY TRENDS 39(1-2):145-167
BIGGS M THE IMPACT OF PEER-REVIEW ON INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM | 0 | 7 |
| 15 | 8 | 19 | 95 1991 INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 12(1):11-13
HEPKER RR INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY - THE FORMAL REVIEW PROCESS | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 8 | 10 | 109 1992 MEDICINA CLINICA 98(8):304-305
LOCK S PEER-REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PAPERS | 0 | 4 |
| 17 | 8 | 49 | 162 1997 REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA 25(148):1946-1950
Shashok K Shared responsibility in expert reviewing of original articles | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 8 | 51 | 180 1999 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY 21(3):412-421
Cicchetti DV Guardians of science: Fairness and reliability of peer review. | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 8 | 26 | 204 2002 CORTEX 38(3):269-271
Della Sala S; Grafman J Refereeing mortus est, vivat refereeing | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 7 | 29 | 96 1991 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 6(3):193-195
BRUMBACK RA PUBLISHING IN BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS - THE SYSTEM IN REVIEW | 1 | 2 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 21 | 7 | 27 | 113 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6893):1668-1672
GILLETT R; HARROW J PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .1. MANAGEMENT WITHIN THE MEDICAL-RESEARCH-COUNCIL | 2 | 12 |
| 22 | 7 | 27 | 114 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6893):1672-1675
GILLETT R; HARROW J PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .2. IS MEDICAL-RESEARCH WELL-SERVED BY PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 12 |
| 23 | 7 | 24 | 120 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):60-61
LOCK S DOES EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW WORK | 3 | 11 |
| 24 | 7 | 47 | 122 1994 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 150(8):1211-1216
HUSTON P INFORMATION FOR PEER REVIEWERS | 1 | 3 |
| 25 | 7 | 20 | 123 1994 CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH 28(8):1134-1139
FABIATO A ANONYMITY OF REVIEWERS | 3 | 13 |
| 26 | 7 | 14 | 132 1994 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION 93(5):1877-1880
SCHARSCHMIDT BF; DEAMICIS A; BACCHETTI P; HELD MJ CHANCE, CONCURRENCE, AND CLUSTERING - ANALYSIS OF REVIEWERS RECOMMENDATIONS ON 1,000 SUBMISSIONS TO THE JOURNAL-OF-CLINICAL-INVESTIGATION | 2 | 11 |
| 27 | 7 | 92 | 161 1997 MEDICINA CLINICA 108(12):460-471
Guallar E; Conde J; delaCal MA; MartinMoreno JM A guide for evaluation of research projects in health sciences | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 7 | 15 | 181 1999 JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE 14(10):622-624
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 7 | 19 | 213 2003 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 10(5):540-542
Ludbrook J Peer review of biomedical manuscripts: an update | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 6 | 41 | 32 1987 JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY 2(2):165-176
MAHONEY MJ SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION AND KNOWLEDGE POLITICS | 1 | 28 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 31 | 6 | 10 | 63 1990 ANNALS OF ALLERGY 65(4):243-243
SLY RM BLINDING REVIEWERS IMPROVES PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 6 | 11 | 70 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1317-1317
RENNIE D EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION - THE 1ST-INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS | 14 | 48 |
| 33 | 6 | 14 | 79 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1371-1376
MCNUTT RA; EVANS AT; FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON THE QUALITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL | 33 | 104 |
| 34 | 6 | 25 | 131 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):143-146
FISHER M; FRIEDMAN SB; STRAUSS B THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON ACCEPTANCE OF RESEARCH PAPERS BY PEER-REVIEW | 11 | 42 |
| 35 | 6 | 11 | 139 1995 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 311(7009):826-826
SMITH R; RENNIE D AND NOW, EVIDENCE BASED EDITING - THE 3RD CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW WILL BE IN PRAGUE IN SEPTEMBER 1997 | 1 | 7 |
| 36 | 6 | 10 | 142 1995 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 10(3):255-256
RIGGS JE PRIORITY, RIVALRY, AND PEER-REVIEW | 2 | 5 |
| 37 | 6 | 69 | 151 1996 LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS 59(3):95-118
Jasanoff S Research subpoenas and the sociology of knowledge | 0 | 6 |
| 38 | 6 | 10 | 160 1997 JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME 22A(5):767-771
Manske PR A review of peer review | 0 | 0 |
| 39 | 6 | 12 | 173 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):234-237
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review - A randomized trial | 11 | 42 |
| 40 | 6 | 15 | 193 2001 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 76(9):911-914
Shea JA; Caelleigh AS; Pangaro L; Steinecke A Review process | 1 | 1 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 41 | 5 | 78 | 17 1986 CURRENT CONTENTS (32):3-12
GARFIELD E REFEREEING AND PEER-REVIEW .2. THE RESEARCH ON REFEREEING AND ALTERNATIVES TO THE PRESENT SYSTEM | 0 | 0 |
| 42 | 5 | 9 | 43 1988 DRUG INTELLIGENCE & CLINICAL PHARMACY 22(7-8):601-602
CLEARY JD; ALEXANDER B BLIND VERSUS NONBLIND REVIEW - SURVEY OF SELECTED MEDICAL JOURNALS | 4 | 13 |
| 43 | 5 | 39 | 46 1988 R & D MANAGEMENT 18(4):333-340
POURIS A PEER-REVIEW IN SCIENTIFICALLY SMALL COUNTRIES | 0 | 3 |
| 44 | 5 | 39 | 88 1990 SCIENTOMETRICS 19(1-2):91-106
HARGENS LL; HERTING JR NEGLECTED CONSIDERATIONS IN THE ANALYSIS OF AGREEMENT AMONG JOURNAL REFEREES | 1 | 5 |
| 45 | 5 | 205 | 90 1991 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE 17(3):209-248
LIPTON JP; OCONNOR M; SALES BD RETHINKING THE ADMISSIBILITY OF MEDICAL TREATISES AS EVIDENCE | 0 | 2 |
| 46 | 5 | 6 | 94 1991 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS 50(1):1-3
REIDENBERG JW; REIDENBERG MM REPORT OF A SURVEY OF SOME ASPECTS OF EDITORIAL-BOARD PEER-REVIEW AT CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY-AND-THERAPEUTICS | 0 | 3 |
| 47 | 5 | 8 | 111 1992 RADIOLOGY 182(1):287-288
DIRK L ATTITUDINAL EXPRESSIONS AS A MEASURE OF REVIEWER FAIRNESS | 0 | 0 |
| 48 | 5 | 14 | 130 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):139-142
GILBERT JR; WILLIAMS ES; LUNDBERG GD IS THERE GENDER BIAS IN JAMAS PEER-REVIEW PROCESS | 5 | 25 |
| 49 | 5 | 14 | 149 1996 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 84(3):359-366
Weller AC Editorial peer review: A comparison of authors publishing in two groups of US medical journals | 0 | 4 |
| 50 | 5 | 16 | 169 1998 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 86(3):421-422
Homan FM Whither peer review: Prague '97 | 0 | 0 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 51 | 5 | 10 | 170 1998 CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN 44():13-14
Reid AJ Canadian family physician's peer reviewers - Unsung heros | 0 | 1 |
| 52 | 5 | 25 | 174 1998 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY 20(3):428-431
Cicchetti DV Good science and good peer reviewing: Are they related? | 0 | 0 |
| 53 | 5 | 17 | 183 1999 NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA 12(5):210-213
Das Sinha S; Sahni P; Nundy S Does exchanging comments of Indian and non-Indian reviewers improve the quality of manuscript reviews? | 0 | 2 |
| 54 | 5 | 43 | 185 1999 PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN 25(2):188-203
Petty RE; Fleming MA The review process at PSPB: Correlates of interreviewer agreement and manuscript acceptance | 0 | 2 |
| 55 | 5 | 10 | 207 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2759-2760
Rennie D Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication | 3 | 19 |
| 56 | 4 | 28 | 10 1985 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 312(10):654-657
BAILAR JC; PATTERSON K JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW - THE NEED FOR A RESEARCH AGENDA | 29 | 63 |
| 57 | 4 | 20 | 27 1987 CHEST 91(2):252-255
ROBIN ED; BURKE CM PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICAL JOURNALS | 9 | 14 |
| 58 | 4 | 48 | 66 1990 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 301(6754):756-759
SMITH J JOURNALOLOGY - OR WHAT EDITORS DO | 2 | 6 |
| 59 | 4 | 6 | 69 1990 DICP-THE ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY 24(11):1117-1118
CLEARY JD; ALEXANDER B BLIND VERSUS NONBLIND REVIEW - A REEVALUATION OF SELECTED MEDICAL JOURNALS | 0 | 0 |
| 60 | 4 | 88 | 72 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1323-1329
BURNHAM JC THE EVOLUTION OF EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW | 9 | 35 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 61 | 4 | 24 | 107 1992 JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 232(3):215-221
FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW MEDICAL JOURNALS AND SOCIETY - THREATS AND RESPONSIBILITIES | 1 | 7 |
| 62 | 4 | 5 | 148 1996 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 313(7066):1185-1185
Wessely S; Brugha T; Cowen P; Smith L; Paykel S Do authors know who refereed their paper? A questionnaire survey | 0 | 4 |
| 63 | 4 | 15 | 150 1996 ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 32(7):573-575
Beritic T Medical reviews and the importance of being a ''peer'' in science | 0 | 0 |
| 64 | 4 | 11 | 175 1998 LANCET 352(9126):441-445
Bingham CM; Higgins G; Coleman R; Van Der Weyden MB The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study | 0 | 18 |
| 65 | 4 | 14 | 178 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7175):4-5
Smith R Opening up BMJ peer review - A beginning that should lead to complete transparency | 6 | 23 |
| 66 | 4 | 13 | 179 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7199):1637-1639
Delamothe T; Smith R Moving beyond journals: the future arrives with a crash - New ways to disseminate research from NIH and the BMJ | 0 | 18 |
| 67 | 4 | 23 | 182 1999 JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 246(2):127-131
Bottiger LE Printed medical journals - will they survive? | 0 | 3 |
| 68 | 4 | 33 | 187 1999 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 29(5):765-776
Dirk L A measure of originality: The elements of science | 0 | 1 |
| 69 | 4 | 29 | 190 2000 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY 53(1):1-2
Holzel H; van Diest PJ The new millennium: Time for a change! | 0 | 6 |
| 70 | 4 | 37 | 192 2001 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 76(9):904-908
Bordage G; Caelleigh AS Introduction - A tool for reviewers: "Review criteria for research manuscripts" | 0 | 1 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 71 | 4 | 15 | 196 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(2):85-91
van Rooyen S The evaluation of peer-review quality | 1 | 1 |
| 72 | 4 | 16 | 202 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 166(8):1019-1023
Hoppin FG How I review an original scientific article | 0 | 8 |
| 73 | 4 | 16 | 208 2002 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 9(2):105-108
Ludbrook J Peer review of manuscripts | 1 | 5 |
| 74 | 4 | 16 | 215 2003 REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES 20(5):671-678
Hoppin GH How I review an original scientific paper | 0 | 0 |
| 75 | 3 | 60 | 7 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):187-195
PETERS DP; CECI SJ PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNALS - THE FATE OF ACCEPTED, PUBLISHED ARTICLES, SUBMITTED AGAIN | 37 | 232 |
| 76 | 3 | 8 | 19 1986 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 256(17):2391-2392
RENNIE D GUARDING THE GUARDIANS - A CONFERENCE ON EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW | 19 | 47 |
| 77 | 3 | 34 | 21 1986 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE 79(11):639-645
SHEPHERD M PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE REDIVIVUS - CONCEPT AND COMMUNICATION | 1 | 4 |
| 78 | 3 | 3 | 22 1986 LANCET 2(8516):1171-1171
[Anon] PEERING INTO PEER-REVIEW | 0 | 0 |
| 79 | 3 | 41 | 25 1987 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW 52(5):631-642
BAKANIC V; MCPHAIL C; SIMON RJ THE MANUSCRIPT REVIEW AND DECISION-MAKING PROCESS | 4 | 33 |
| 80 | 3 | 12 | 26 1987 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 295(6599):656-659
NEWCOMBE RG TOWARDS A REDUCTION IN PUBLICATION BIAS | 0 | 38 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 81 | 3 | 9 | 35 1988 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN 142(4):427-428
RENNIE D; KNOLL E RESEARCH INTO EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - AN INVITATION TO A CONGRESS | 0 | 0 |
| 82 | 3 | 25 | 37 1988 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 296(6620):484-488
SMITH R RESEARCH POLICY - PEERING INTO THE BOWELS OF THE MRC .1. SETTING PRIORITIES | 2 | 12 |
| 83 | 3 | 11 | 38 1988 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 296(6621):556-560
SMITH R PEERING INTO THE BOWELS OF THE MRC .2. REVIEW SYSTEMS | 2 | 5 |
| 84 | 3 | 27 | 39 1988 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 296(6624):774-777
SMITH R RESEARCH POLICY - PROBLEMS WITH PEER-REVIEW AND ALTERNATIVES | 7 | 17 |
| 85 | 3 | 23 | 54 1989 HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY 43(1):20-38
GILLETT R RESEARCH PERFORMANCE INDICATORS BASED ON PEER-REVIEW - A CRITICAL ANALYSIS | 0 | 12 |
| 86 | 3 | 72 | 61 1989 SCIENTOMETRICS 15(3-4):257-282
RICE RE; BORGMAN CL; BEDNARSKI D; HART PJ JOURNAL-TO-JOURNAL CITATION DATA - ISSUES OF VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY | 0 | 34 |
| 87 | 3 | 94 | 65 1990 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 113(4):317-325
FYE WB MEDICAL AUTHORSHIP - TRADITIONS, TRENDS, AND TRIBULATIONS | 2 | 34 |
| 88 | 3 | 21 | 67 1990 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 78(3):258-265
WELLER AC EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW - METHODOLOGY AND DATA-COLLECTION | 0 | 1 |
| 89 | 3 | 4 | 78 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1369-1371
GARFUNKEL JM; ULSHEN MH; HAMRICK HJ; LAWSON EE PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED BY SECONDARY REVIEW OF ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPTS | 5 | 28 |
| 90 | 3 | 12 | 81 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1390-1391
SHARP DW WHAT CAN AND SHOULD BE DONE TO REDUCE PUBLICATION BIAS - THE PERSPECTIVE OF AN EDITOR | 7 | 30 |
| # | LCR | NCR | Nodes / Authors / Date | LCS | GCS |
| 91 | 3 | 20 | 102 1992 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 116(11):912-919
WILKES MS; DOBLIN BH; SHAPIRO MF PHARMACEUTICAL ADVERTISEMENTS IN LEADING MEDICAL JOURNALS - EXPERTS ASSESSMENTS | 3 | 116 |
| 92 | 3 | 11 | 103 1992 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 116(11):951-952
FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW PHARMACEUTICAL ADVERTISEMENTS IN MEDICAL JOURNALS | 2 | 26 |
| 93 | 3 | 20 | 105 1992 DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT 117(48):1854-1858
ROTHMUND M ENSURING QUALITY OF MEDICAL PUBLICATIONS | 0 | 4 |
| 94 | 3 | 27 | 112 1993 ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION IN ENGLISH 32(2):234-238
DANIEL HD AN EVALUATION OF THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS AT ANGEWANDTE-CHEMIE | 3 | 8 |
| 95 | 3 | 14 | 127 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):96-97
KASSIRER JP; CAMPION EW PEER-REVIEW - CRUDE AND UNDERSTUDIED, BUT INDISPENSABLE | 15 | 50 |
| 96 | 3 | 5 | 129 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):137-138
GARFUNKEL JM; ULSHEN MH; HAMRICK HJ; LAWSON EE EFFECT OF INSTITUTIONAL PRESTIGE ON REVIEWERS RECOMMENDATIONS AND EDITORIAL DECISIONS | 2 | 13 |
| 97 | 3 | 17 | 141 1995 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 10(3):175-176
BRUMBACK RA JUNK SCIENCE - IS PEER-REVIEW THE ANSWER | 0 | 2 |
| 98 | 3 | 13 | 145 1996 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 19(3):534-&
Cicchetti DV Peer review: Agreement and disagreement - Response | 1 | 1 |
| 99 | 3 | 34 | 146 1996 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 19(3):538-&
Velmans M Consciousness and the ''causal paradox'' - Response | 0 | 1 |
| 100 | 3 | 26 | 147 1996 BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE 46(406):268-270
Taylor RJ Experts and evidence | 0 | 1 |
Page 1: 1 2 3
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad).
Version: 2004.05.14