Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Fri Jun 25 11:07:17 2004
Papers Citing "A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine"
and these papers added:
PETERS DP, 1982, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V5, P187
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
BAILAR JC, 1985, NEW ENGL J MED, V312, P654
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
HORROBIN DF, 1990, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V263, P1438
COLE S, 1981, SCIENCE, V214, P881
WILSON JD, 1978, J CLIN INVEST, V61, P1697
KASSIRER JP, 1994, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V272, P96
MAHONEY MJ, 1977, COGNITIVE THERAPY RE, V1, P161
LOCK S, 1990, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V263, P1341

Nodes: 216
Authors: 260, Journals: 121, Outer References: 4003
Collection span: 1967 - 2003
View: Overview. Sorted by first author.
Page 1:  1  2  3
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1215128 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):105-107
ABBY M; MASSEY MD; GALANDIUK S; POLK HC
PEER-REVIEW IS AN EFFECTIVE SCREENING PROCESS TO EVALUATE MEDICAL MANUSCRIPTS
317
22868 1990 CURRENT CONTENTS 40():7-11
ABT HA
THE USE OF PUBLICATION STUDIES TO AFFECT POLICIES AND ATTITUDES IN ASTRONOMY .2.
00
318184 1999 NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL 112(1099):416-416
Allison J; Clayton J
The Journal: 1997-1999
00
442810 1985 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 312(10):654-657
BAILAR JC; PATTERSON K
JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW - THE NEED FOR A RESEARCH AGENDA
2963
534125 1987 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW 52(5):631-642
BAKANIC V; MCPHAIL C; SIMON RJ
THE MANUSCRIPT REVIEW AND DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
433
61447 1988 SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 19(2):109-115
BANNER JM
PRESERVING THE INTEGRITY OF PEER-REVIEW
113
7138201 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 97(11):2695-2699
Baron JH; Sonnenberg A
The wax and wane of intestinal autointoxication and visceroptosis - Historical trends of real versus apparent new digestive diseases
00
81118 1986 DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY 28(4):415-416
BAX M
IMAGINATION AND PEER REVIEWING
00
91155 1989 MEDICAL DECISION MAKING 9(1):1-1
BECK JR
DIRECTIONS FOR MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING
00
10415150 1996 ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 32(7):573-575
Beritic T
Medical reviews and the importance of being a ''peer'' in science
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
1189186 1990 LIBRARY TRENDS 39(1-2):145-167
BIGGS M
THE IMPACT OF PEER-REVIEW ON INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM
07
1224152 1996 MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA 164(1):8-9
Bingham C; Coleman R
Enter the Web: An experiment in electronic research peer review
04
13411175 1998 LANCET 352(9126):441-445
Bingham CM; Higgins G; Coleman R; Van Der Weyden MB
The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study
018
142328134 1994 TEXAS LAW REVIEW 72(4):715-802
BLACK B; AYALA FJ; SAFFRANBRINKS C
SCIENCE AND THE LAW IN THE WAKE OF DAUBERT - A NEW SEARCH FOR SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE
249
1513498 1991 JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION 21(5):31-36
BLANCETT SS
THE ETHICS OF WRITING AND PUBLISHING
09
161620 1986 JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES 75(1):1-1
BOOTS SG
THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF AUTHORS
01
17437192 2001 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 76(9):904-908
Bordage G; Caelleigh AS
Introduction - A tool for reviewers: "Review criteria for research manuscripts"
01
18423182 1999 JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 246(2):127-131
Bottiger LE
Printed medical journals - will they survive?
03
191106212 2003 COMPARATIVE STUDIES IN SOCIETY AND HISTORY 45(3):511-545
Boyer D
Censorship as a vocation: The institutions, practices, and cultural logic of media control in the German democratic republic
00
202897 1991 JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE 179(6):307-308
BRODY EB
A DIFFICULT BALANCE - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICINE - LOCK,S
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
2172996 1991 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 6(3):193-195
BRUMBACK RA
PUBLISHING IN BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS - THE SYSTEM IN REVIEW
12
22317141 1995 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 10(3):175-176
BRUMBACK RA
JUNK SCIENCE - IS PEER-REVIEW THE ANSWER
02
2315749 1989 ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES 48(4):347-350
BUCHANAN WW; BROOKS PM
RHEUMATOLOGY BEYOND 2000 - WITHER OR WHITHER
01
2448872 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1323-1329
BURNHAM JC
THE EVOLUTION OF EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW
935
2528104 1992 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 80(2):206-207
BYRD GD
PEER-REVIEW IN SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING - PAPERS FROM THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION - COUNCIL-OF-BIOL-EDITORS
00
2638191 2000 MEDICINA CLINICA 115(11):418-422
Carles CP; Gomez-Gerique J; Millet VG; de Cabo JV; Martul ES; Hernandez JLM
Analysis of evaluation process in research projects submitted to the Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria, Spain
01
271118291 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):119-134
CICCHETTI DV
THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY INVESTIGATION
1080
28313145 1996 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 19(3):534-&
Cicchetti DV
Peer review: Agreement and disagreement - Response
11
29525174 1998 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY 20(3):428-431
Cicchetti DV
Good science and good peer reviewing: Are they related?
00
30851180 1999 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY 21(3):412-421
Cicchetti DV
Guardians of science: Fairness and reliability of peer review.
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
315943 1988 DRUG INTELLIGENCE & CLINICAL PHARMACY 22(7-8):601-602
CLEARY JD; ALEXANDER B
BLIND VERSUS NONBLIND REVIEW - SURVEY OF SELECTED MEDICAL JOURNALS
413
324669 1990 DICP-THE ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY 24(11):1117-1118
CLEARY JD; ALEXANDER B
BLIND VERSUS NONBLIND REVIEW - A REEVALUATION OF SELECTED MEDICAL JOURNALS
00
33056 1981 SCIENCE 214(4523):881-886
COLE S; COLE JR; SIMON GA
CHANCE AND CONSENSUS IN PEER-REVIEW
20142
340221 1967 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGIST 2(4):195-201
CRANE D
GATEKEEPERS OF SCIENCE - SOME FACTORS AFFECTING SELECTION OF ARTICLES FOR SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS
12162
3523783 1990 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE 41(3):223-228
CRAWFORD S; STUCKI L
PEER-REVIEW AND THE CHANGING RESEARCH RECORD
01
3626195136 1995 ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 30():213-250
Dalton MS
Refereeing of scholarly works for primary publishing
14
3712100 1991 SERIALS LIBRARIAN 19(3-4):91-94
DANCIK BP
THE IMPORTANCE OF PEER-REVIEW
01
38327112 1993 ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION IN ENGLISH 32(2):234-238
DANIEL HD
AN EVALUATION OF THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS AT ANGEWANDTE-CHEMIE
38
39517183 1999 NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA 12(5):210-213
Das Sinha S; Sahni P; Nundy S
Does exchanging comments of Indian and non-Indian reviewers improve the quality of manuscript reviews?
02
4011144 1996 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 125(2):148-148
Davidoff F
Currents
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
41310165 1998 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 128(1):66-68
Davidoff F
Masking, blinding, and peer review: The blind leading the blinded
315
421642 1988 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY 34(4):360-362
DAY RA
TRIALS AND TRIBULATIONS OF A JOURNAL EDITOR
00
43413179 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7199):1637-1639
Delamothe T; Smith R
Moving beyond journals: the future arrives with a crash - New ways to disseminate research from NIH and the BMJ
018
44826204 2002 CORTEX 38(3):269-271
Della Sala S; Grafman J
Refereeing mortus est, vivat refereeing
00
4517200 2001 PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE 63(1):1-3
Dimsdale JE
Medical publishing: Remembrance of things past and intimations of the future
01
4658111 1992 RADIOLOGY 182(1):287-288
DIRK L
ATTITUDINAL EXPRESSIONS AS A MEASURE OF REVIEWER FAIRNESS
00
471464156 1996 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 18(1):3-28
Dirk L
From laboratory to scientific literature - The life and death of biomedical research results
11
48433187 1999 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 29(5):765-776
Dirk L
A measure of originality: The elements of science
01
49238194 2001 ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY 12(11):1611-1617
Djulbegovic B; Adams JR; Lyman GH; Lacevic M; Hozo I; Greenwich M; Bennett CL
Evaluation and appraisal of randomized controlled trials in myeloma
03
50128115 1993 JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION 49(4):356-369
ELLIS D; COX D; HALL K
A COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION-SEEKING PATTERNS OF RESEARCHERS IN THE PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL-SCIENCES
042
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
51128110 1992 PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES 13(4):393-399
EYSENCK HJ; EYSENCK SBG
PEER-REVIEW - ADVICE TO REFEREES AND CONTRIBUTORS
14
52720123 1994 CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH 28(8):1134-1139
FABIATO A
ANONYMITY OF REVIEWERS
313
5316158 1997 BIOMETRICS 53(2):715-719
Finney DJ
The responsible referee
02
54625131 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):143-146
FISHER M; FRIEDMAN SB; STRAUSS B
THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON ACCEPTANCE OF RESEARCH PAPERS BY PEER-REVIEW
1142
551492 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):146-146
FLETCHER JM
JOURNAL AVAILABILITY AND THE QUALITY OF PUBLISHED RESEARCH
12
5637214 2003 LANCET 361(9351):10-11
Fletcher RH
Adverts in medical journals: caveat lector
05
571964 1990 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 113(1):6-8
FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
A TRANSITION
02
58311103 1992 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 116(11):951-952
FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
PHARMACEUTICAL ADVERTISEMENTS IN MEDICAL JOURNALS
226
59424107 1992 JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 232(3):215-221
FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
MEDICAL JOURNALS AND SOCIETY - THREATS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
17
60131108 1992 JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 232(3):223-228
FLETCHER SW; FLETCHER RH
RESPONSIBILITIES OF MEDICAL JOURNALS TO READERS
26
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
61141189 2000 EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS 22(1):181-185
Florey CD; Ben-Shlomo Y; Egger M
Epidemiology and the World Wide Web: Is there a 'net benefit?
02
6213154 1996 PREVENTIVE MEDICINE 25(2):102-104
Frank E
Editors' requests of peer reviewers: A study and a proposal
27
6311168 1998 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 173():114-115
Freeman HL
Quantifying quality
00
6439465 1990 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 113(4):317-325
FYE WB
MEDICAL AUTHORSHIP - TRADITIONS, TRENDS, AND TRIBULATIONS
234
6512077 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1355-1357
GARDNER MJ; BOND J
AN EXPLORATORY-STUDY OF STATISTICAL ASSESSMENT OF PAPERS PUBLISHED IN THE BRITISH-MEDICAL-JOURNAL
660
6612113 1986 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 292(6523):810-812
GARDNER MJ; MACHIN D; CAMPBELL MJ
USE OF CHECK LISTS IN ASSESSING THE STATISTICAL CONTENT OF MEDICAL STUDIES
281
6721211 1986 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 105(2):313-320
GARFIELD E
WHICH MEDICAL JOURNALS HAVE THE GREATEST IMPACT
579
6857817 1986 CURRENT CONTENTS (32):3-12
GARFIELD E
REFEREEING AND PEER-REVIEW .2. THE RESEARCH ON REFEREEING AND ALTERNATIVES TO THE PRESENT SYSTEM
00
6921128 1987 CURRENT CONTENTS (2):3-9
GARFIELD E
WHICH MEDICAL JOURNALS HAVE THE GREATEST IMPACT
00
7022129 1987 CURRENT CONTENTS (7):3-12
GARFIELD E
THE 101 MOST-CITED PAPERS FROM THE BRITISH-MEDICAL-JOURNAL HIGHLIGHT THE IMPORTANT ROLE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY IN MEDICINE
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
7121253 1989 CURRENT CONTENTS 31():3-6
GARFIELD E
REQUIRING STANDARDS FOR SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS HAS COME OF AGE - INTRODUCTION TO MAKE SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS MORE RESPONSIVE - AND RESPONSIBLE BY HERXHEIMER,ANDREW (REPRINTED FROM THE SCIENTIST, VOL 3, PG 9, 1989)
01
721180 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1376-1378
GARFUNKEL JM; LAWSON EE; HAMRICK HJ; ULSHEN MH
EFFECT OF ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION ON THE AUTHORS EVALUATION OF PEER-REVIEW OF MEDICAL MANUSCRIPTS
29
733478 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1369-1371
GARFUNKEL JM; ULSHEN MH; HAMRICK HJ; LAWSON EE
PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED BY SECONDARY REVIEW OF ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPTS
528
7435129 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):137-138
GARFUNKEL JM; ULSHEN MH; HAMRICK HJ; LAWSON EE
EFFECT OF INSTITUTIONAL PRESTIGE ON REVIEWERS RECOMMENDATIONS AND EDITORIAL DECISIONS
213
75514130 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):139-142
GILBERT JR; WILLIAMS ES; LUNDBERG GD
IS THERE GENDER BIAS IN JAMAS PEER-REVIEW PROCESS
525
7632354 1989 HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY 43(1):20-38
GILLETT R
RESEARCH PERFORMANCE INDICATORS BASED ON PEER-REVIEW - A CRITICAL ANALYSIS
012
77727113 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6893):1668-1672
GILLETT R; HARROW J
PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .1. MANAGEMENT WITHIN THE MEDICAL-RESEARCH-COUNCIL
212
78727114 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6893):1672-1675
GILLETT R; HARROW J
PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .2. IS MEDICAL-RESEARCH WELL-SERVED BY PEER-REVIEW
012
7929209 2002 JOURNAL OF PEACE RESEARCH 39(3):259-262
Gleditsch NP
Double-blind but more transparent
00
80130135 1995 ANAESTHESIA 50(6):485-487
GOODMAN NW
PONDERING AUTHORSHIP - A SYMPTOM OF A DEEPER MALAISE
18
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
811136119 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):11-21
GOODMAN SN; BERLIN J; FLETCHER SW; FLETCHER RH
MANUSCRIPT QUALITY BEFORE AND AFTER PEER-REVIEW AND EDITING AT ANNALS OF INTERNAL-MEDICINE
1168
82792161 1997 MEDICINA CLINICA 108(12):460-471
Guallar E; Conde J; delaCal MA; MartinMoreno JM
A guide for evaluation of research projects in health sciences
02
8321676 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1348-1352
HARGENS LL
VARIATION IN JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW SYSTEMS - POSSIBLE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
517
8453988 1990 SCIENTOMETRICS 19(1-2):91-106
HARGENS LL; HERTING JR
NEGLECTED CONSIDERATIONS IN THE ANALYSIS OF AGREEMENT AMONG JOURNAL REFEREES
15
851123 1986 NATURE 322(6074):24-25
HARNAD S
A DIFFICULT BALANCE - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICINE - LOCK,S
15
8681995 1991 INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 12(1):11-13
HEPKER RR
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY - THE FORMAL REVIEW PROCESS
00
871260 1989 SCIENTIST 3(6):9-&
HERXHEIMER A
MAKE SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS MORE RESPONSIVE - AND RESPONSIBLE
15
8817106211 2003 ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION 8(1):75-96
Hojat M; Gonnella JS; Caelleigh AS
Impartial judgment by the "gatekeepers" of science: Fallibility and accountability in the peer review process
02
89429190 2000 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY 53(1):1-2
Holzel H; van Diest PJ
The new millennium: Time for a change!
06
90516169 1998 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 86(3):421-422
Homan FM
Whither peer review: Prague '97
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
91416202 2002 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 166(8):1019-1023
Hoppin FG
How I review an original scientific article
08
92416215 2003 REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES 20(5):671-678
Hoppin GH
How I review an original scientific paper
00
9302482 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1438-1441
HORROBIN DF
THE PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS OF PEER-REVIEW AND THE SUPPRESSION OF INNOVATION
2099
941022167 1998 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 173():110-113
Howard L; Wilkinson G
Peer review and editorial decision-making
17
95747122 1994 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 150(8):1211-1216
HUSTON P
INFORMATION FOR PEER REVIEWERS
13
96143 1974 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 56(5):686-692
INGELFINGER FJ
PEER REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION
2776
97669151 1996 LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS 59(3):95-118
Jasanoff S
Research subpoenas and the sociology of knowledge
06
98314127 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):96-97
KASSIRER JP; CAMPION EW
PEER-REVIEW - CRUDE AND UNDERSTUDIED, BUT INDISPENSABLE
1550
9919166 1998 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 172():193-193
Kerr A
Original publications
03
100279164 1997 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 18(4):297-319
Kiernan V
Ingelfinger, embargoes, and other controls on the dissemination of science news
04

Page 1:  1  2  3
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14