Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary  HistCite Guide  About
Fri Jun 25 11:07:18 2004
Papers Citing "A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine"
and these papers added:
PETERS DP, 1982, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V5, P187
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
BAILAR JC, 1985, NEW ENGL J MED, V312, P654
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
HORROBIN DF, 1990, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V263, P1438
COLE S, 1981, SCIENCE, V214, P881
WILSON JD, 1978, J CLIN INVEST, V61, P1697
KASSIRER JP, 1994, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V272, P96
MAHONEY MJ, 1977, COGNITIVE THERAPY RE, V1, P161
LOCK S, 1990, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V263, P1341

Nodes: 216
Authors: 260, Journals: 121, Outer References: 4003
Collection span: 1967 - 2003
View: Overview. Sorted by year, source, volume, issue, page.
Page 2:  1  2  3
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
101116101 1991 SURGERY 110(1):1-7
SIMMONS RL; POLK HC; WILLIAMS B; MAVROUDIS C
MISCONDUCT AND FRAUD IN RESEARCH - SOCIAL AND LEGISLATIVE ISSUES SYMPOSIUM OF THE SOCIETY OF UNIVERSITY SURGEONS
13
102320102 1992 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 116(11):912-919
WILKES MS; DOBLIN BH; SHAPIRO MF
PHARMACEUTICAL ADVERTISEMENTS IN LEADING MEDICAL JOURNALS - EXPERTS ASSESSMENTS
3116
103311103 1992 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 116(11):951-952
FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
PHARMACEUTICAL ADVERTISEMENTS IN MEDICAL JOURNALS
226
10428104 1992 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 80(2):206-207
BYRD GD
PEER-REVIEW IN SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING - PAPERS FROM THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION - COUNCIL-OF-BIOL-EDITORS
00
105320105 1992 DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT 117(48):1854-1858
ROTHMUND M
ENSURING QUALITY OF MEDICAL PUBLICATIONS
04
10623106 1992 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 267(21):2892-2892
RENNIE D; FLANAGIN A
PUBLICATION BIAS AND THE EDITORIAL PROCESS - REPLY
00
107424107 1992 JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 232(3):215-221
FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
MEDICAL JOURNALS AND SOCIETY - THREATS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
17
108131108 1992 JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 232(3):223-228
FLETCHER SW; FLETCHER RH
RESPONSIBILITIES OF MEDICAL JOURNALS TO READERS
26
109810109 1992 MEDICINA CLINICA 98(8):304-305
LOCK S
PEER-REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PAPERS
04
110128110 1992 PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES 13(4):393-399
EYSENCK HJ; EYSENCK SBG
PEER-REVIEW - ADVICE TO REFEREES AND CONTRIBUTORS
14
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
11158111 1992 RADIOLOGY 182(1):287-288
DIRK L
ATTITUDINAL EXPRESSIONS AS A MEASURE OF REVIEWER FAIRNESS
00
112327112 1993 ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION IN ENGLISH 32(2):234-238
DANIEL HD
AN EVALUATION OF THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS AT ANGEWANDTE-CHEMIE
38
113727113 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6893):1668-1672
GILLETT R; HARROW J
PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .1. MANAGEMENT WITHIN THE MEDICAL-RESEARCH-COUNCIL
212
114727114 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6893):1672-1675
GILLETT R; HARROW J
PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .2. IS MEDICAL-RESEARCH WELL-SERVED BY PEER-REVIEW
012
115128115 1993 JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION 49(4):356-369
ELLIS D; COX D; HALL K
A COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION-SEEKING PATTERNS OF RESEARCHERS IN THE PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL-SCIENCES
042
1161247116 1993 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH SECTION B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES 101():359-375
LOCK S
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN MEDICAL PUBLICATION
00
11717117 1994 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 118(1):104-105
STRAATSMA BR
INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS AND BENEFITS TO READERS
00
11826118 1994 ANNALS OF ALLERGY 72(3):183-183
SLY RM
STRUCTURED ABSTRACTS
00
1191136119 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):11-21
GOODMAN SN; BERLIN J; FLETCHER SW; FLETCHER RH
MANUSCRIPT QUALITY BEFORE AND AFTER PEER-REVIEW AND EDITING AT ANNALS OF INTERNAL-MEDICINE
1168
120724120 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):60-61
LOCK S
DOES EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW WORK
311
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
121916121 1994 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 309(6948):143-144
SMITH R
PROMOTING RESEARCH INTO PEER-REVIEW
828
122747122 1994 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 150(8):1211-1216
HUSTON P
INFORMATION FOR PEER REVIEWERS
13
123720123 1994 CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH 28(8):1134-1139
FABIATO A
ANONYMITY OF REVIEWERS
313
12412124 1994 GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE 54(5):R3-R3
[Anon]
MAXIM OF THE UNKNOWN LISTENER
00
12512125 1994 GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE 54(12):R3-R3
[Anon]
MULTIPLE AUTHORS - WHO IS DOING WHAT
00
126125126 1994 INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION 112(1):96-116
PARBERRY I
A GUIDE FOR NEW REFEREES IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER-SCIENCE
00
127314127 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):96-97
KASSIRER JP; CAMPION EW
PEER-REVIEW - CRUDE AND UNDERSTUDIED, BUT INDISPENSABLE
1550
128215128 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):105-107
ABBY M; MASSEY MD; GALANDIUK S; POLK HC
PEER-REVIEW IS AN EFFECTIVE SCREENING PROCESS TO EVALUATE MEDICAL MANUSCRIPTS
317
12935129 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):137-138
GARFUNKEL JM; ULSHEN MH; HAMRICK HJ; LAWSON EE
EFFECT OF INSTITUTIONAL PRESTIGE ON REVIEWERS RECOMMENDATIONS AND EDITORIAL DECISIONS
213
130514130 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):139-142
GILBERT JR; WILLIAMS ES; LUNDBERG GD
IS THERE GENDER BIAS IN JAMAS PEER-REVIEW PROCESS
525
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
131625131 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):143-146
FISHER M; FRIEDMAN SB; STRAUSS B
THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON ACCEPTANCE OF RESEARCH PAPERS BY PEER-REVIEW
1142
132714132 1994 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION 93(5):1877-1880
SCHARSCHMIDT BF; DEAMICIS A; BACCHETTI P; HELD MJ
CHANCE, CONCURRENCE, AND CLUSTERING - ANALYSIS OF REVIEWERS RECOMMENDATIONS ON 1,000 SUBMISSIONS TO THE JOURNAL-OF-CLINICAL-INVESTIGATION
211
13312133 1994 OPHTHALMOLOGY 101(4):627-628
LICHTER PR
NO JUMP BALLS IN JOURNAL EDITING
00
1342328134 1994 TEXAS LAW REVIEW 72(4):715-802
BLACK B; AYALA FJ; SAFFRANBRINKS C
SCIENCE AND THE LAW IN THE WAKE OF DAUBERT - A NEW SEARCH FOR SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE
249
135130135 1995 ANAESTHESIA 50(6):485-487
GOODMAN NW
PONDERING AUTHORSHIP - A SYMPTOM OF A DEEPER MALAISE
18
13626195136 1995 ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 30():213-250
Dalton MS
Refereeing of scholarly works for primary publishing
14
13713137 1995 ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD 72(3):268-270
LILLEYMAN JS
HOW TO WRITE A SCIENTIFIC PAPER - A ROUGH GUIDE TO GETTING PUBLISHED
02
13824138 1995 AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL 72(9):321-321
LUDBROOK J
WORDS ON NUMBERS
00
139611139 1995 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 311(7009):826-826
SMITH R; RENNIE D
AND NOW, EVIDENCE BASED EDITING - THE 3RD CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW WILL BE IN PRAGUE IN SEPTEMBER 1997
17
1402437140 1995 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS 76():217-221
MICHELS R
PEER-REVIEW
04
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
141317141 1995 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 10(3):175-176
BRUMBACK RA
JUNK SCIENCE - IS PEER-REVIEW THE ANSWER
02
142610142 1995 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 10(3):255-256
RIGGS JE
PRIORITY, RIVALRY, AND PEER-REVIEW
25
14324143 1995 LEARNED PUBLISHING 8(3):139-140
WILLIAMSON A
PEER-REVIEW RESEARCH - AN INVITATION TO ALPSP MEMBERS TO JOIN LOCKNET
01
14411144 1996 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 125(2):148-148
Davidoff F
Currents
00
145313145 1996 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 19(3):534-&
Cicchetti DV
Peer review: Agreement and disagreement - Response
11
146334146 1996 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 19(3):538-&
Velmans M
Consciousness and the ''causal paradox'' - Response
01
147326147 1996 BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE 46(406):268-270
Taylor RJ
Experts and evidence
01
14845148 1996 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 313(7066):1185-1185
Wessely S; Brugha T; Cowen P; Smith L; Paykel S
Do authors know who refereed their paper? A questionnaire survey
04
149514149 1996 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 84(3):359-366
Weller AC
Editorial peer review: A comparison of authors publishing in two groups of US medical journals
04
150415150 1996 ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 32(7):573-575
Beritic T
Medical reviews and the importance of being a ''peer'' in science
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
151669151 1996 LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS 59(3):95-118
Jasanoff S
Research subpoenas and the sociology of knowledge
06
15224152 1996 MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA 164(1):8-9
Bingham C; Coleman R
Enter the Web: An experiment in electronic research peer review
04
153341153 1996 MONIST 79(4):536-563
Shatz D
Is peer-review overrated?
02
15413154 1996 PREVENTIVE MEDICINE 25(2):102-104
Frank E
Editors' requests of peer reviewers: A study and a proposal
27
1551237155 1996 PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE 26(5):883-886
Wessely S
What do we know about peer review?
26
1561464156 1996 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 18(1):3-28
Dirk L
From laboratory to scientific literature - The life and death of biomedical research results
11
15717157 1996 TEKSTIL 45(12):624-626
Zajec J
Position and importance of the periodical Tekstil as a means of transferring data
02
15816158 1997 BIOMETRICS 53(2):715-719
Finney DJ
The responsible referee
02
159151159 1997 FAMILY PRACTICE 14(2):124-129
Stalman W; vanEssen GA; vanderGraaf Y; deMelker RA
Maxillary sinusitis in adults: An evaluation of placebo-controlled double-blind trials
015
160610160 1997 JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME 22A(5):767-771
Manske PR
A review of peer review
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
161792161 1997 MEDICINA CLINICA 108(12):460-471
Guallar E; Conde J; delaCal MA; MartinMoreno JM
A guide for evaluation of research projects in health sciences
02
162849162 1997 REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA 25(148):1946-1950
Shashok K
Shared responsibility in expert reviewing of original articles
01
16315163 1997 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 18(3):187-193
LaFollette MC
Editorial: An accelerated rate of change - Journal publishing
00
164279164 1997 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 18(4):297-319
Kiernan V
Ingelfinger, embargoes, and other controls on the dissemination of science news
04
165310165 1998 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 128(1):66-68
Davidoff F
Masking, blinding, and peer review: The blind leading the blinded
315
16619166 1998 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 172():193-193
Kerr A
Original publications
03
1671022167 1998 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 173():110-113
Howard L; Wilkinson G
Peer review and editorial decision-making
17
16811168 1998 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 173():114-115
Freeman HL
Quantifying quality
00
169516169 1998 BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 86(3):421-422
Homan FM
Whither peer review: Prague '97
00
170510170 1998 CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN 44():13-14
Reid AJ
Canadian family physician's peer reviewers - Unsung heros
01
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
17113171 1998 CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN 44():15-16
Squires BP
Peer review under scrutiny - Report on the third International Congress in Prague, 1997
00
172933172 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):214-215
Rennie D
Peer review in Prague
211
173612173 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):234-237
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review - A randomized trial
1142
174525174 1998 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY 20(3):428-431
Cicchetti DV
Good science and good peer reviewing: Are they related?
00
175411175 1998 LANCET 352(9126):441-445
Bingham CM; Higgins G; Coleman R; Van Der Weyden MB
The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study
018
17621318176 1998 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW 59(3):677-717
Noah L
Sanctifying scientific peer review: Publication as a proxy for regulatory decisionmaking
07
177265177 1999 ANNUAL REVIEW OF MEDICINE 50():99-110
Laine C; Weinberg DS
How can physicians keep up-to-date?
03
178414178 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7175):4-5
Smith R
Opening up BMJ peer review - A beginning that should lead to complete transparency
623
179413179 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7199):1637-1639
Delamothe T; Smith R
Moving beyond journals: the future arrives with a crash - New ways to disseminate research from NIH and the BMJ
018
180851180 1999 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY 21(3):412-421
Cicchetti DV
Guardians of science: Fairness and reliability of peer review.
00
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
181715181 1999 JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE 14(10):622-624
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review
03
182423182 1999 JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 246(2):127-131
Bottiger LE
Printed medical journals - will they survive?
03
183517183 1999 NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA 12(5):210-213
Das Sinha S; Sahni P; Nundy S
Does exchanging comments of Indian and non-Indian reviewers improve the quality of manuscript reviews?
02
18418184 1999 NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL 112(1099):416-416
Allison J; Clayton J
The Journal: 1997-1999
00
185543185 1999 PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN 25(2):188-203
Petty RE; Fleming MA
The review process at PSPB: Correlates of interreviewer agreement and manuscript acceptance
02
186117186 1999 SCIENTOMETRICS 44(3):507-519
Roosendaal HE; Geurts PATM
Scientific communication and its relevance to research policy
02
187433187 1999 SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 29(5):765-776
Dirk L
A measure of originality: The elements of science
01
18815188 2000 CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH 46(1):1-13
Opthof T; Coronel R; Janse MJ
Where do our reviewers come from?
01
189141189 2000 EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS 22(1):181-185
Florey CD; Ben-Shlomo Y; Egger M
Epidemiology and the World Wide Web: Is there a 'net benefit?
02
190429190 2000 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY 53(1):1-2
Holzel H; van Diest PJ
The new millennium: Time for a change!
06
#LCRNCRNodes / Authors / DateLCSGCS
19138191 2000 MEDICINA CLINICA 115(11):418-422
Carles CP; Gomez-Gerique J; Millet VG; de Cabo JV; Martul ES; Hernandez JLM
Analysis of evaluation process in research projects submitted to the Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria, Spain
01
192437192 2001 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 76(9):904-908
Bordage G; Caelleigh AS
Introduction - A tool for reviewers: "Review criteria for research manuscripts"
01
193615193 2001 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 76(9):911-914
Shea JA; Caelleigh AS; Pangaro L; Steinecke A
Review process
11
194238194 2001 ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY 12(11):1611-1617
Djulbegovic B; Adams JR; Lyman GH; Lacevic M; Hozo I; Greenwich M; Bennett CL
Evaluation and appraisal of randomized controlled trials in myeloma
03
195114195 2001 HOSPITAL MEDICINE 62(5):301-304
Morris S
The future of journals: where will electronic publishing take us?
02
196415196 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(2):85-91
van Rooyen S
The evaluation of peer-review quality
11
197319197 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(4):257-263
Wager E; Jefferson T
Shortcomings of peer review in biomedical journals
02
198329198 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(4):273-285
Shum SB; Sumner T
JIME: an interactive journal for interactive media (Reprinted from First Monday, vol 6, 2001)
00
1991541199 2001 PHARMACOTHERAPY 21(4):395-404
Sylvia LM; Herbel JL
Manuscript peer review - A guide for health care professionals
01
20017200 2001 PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE 63(1):1-3
Dimsdale JE
Medical publishing: Remembrance of things past and intimations of the future
01

Page 2:  1  2  3
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14