HistCite - Anthony F.J. van Raan & the citing papers

Add FileX ?

Use wildcard '*' to add more than one file at a time. For example, if you have file1, file2, etc. all in the same folder or directory; first, locate one of the files with the [Browse...] button. Then alter the file path in the box above to include '*' character (eg. file*). Wildcard '?' to blanket only one character works too.
Note: In Windows you can select multiple files and "drag and drop" them onto HistCite icon or shortcut. The program would start and load those files.

#	Date / Author / Journal	LCS	GCS	LCR	CR
901	822 Tijssen RJW Scoreboards of research excellence RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2003 AUG; 12 (2): 91-103	6	6	3	21
902	833 Aksnes DW Characteristics of highly cited papers RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2003 DEC; 12 (3): 159-170	16	18	9	29
903	834 Porter AL, Newman NC, Myers WW, Schoeneck D Projects and publications: interesting patterns in US Environmental Protection Agency research RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2003 DEC; 12 (3): 171-182	0	0	3	5
904	835 Grupp H Evolution of a theory in economics: bibliometric assessment of search theory vis-a-vis game theory RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2003 DEC; 12 (3): 205-216	0	0	1	55
905	882 Glaser J, Spurling TH, Butler L Intraorganisational evaluation: are there 'least evaluable units' RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2004 APR; 13 (1): 19-32	1	2	5	19
906	883 Aksnes DW, Taxt RE Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2004 APR; 13 (1): 33-41	14	16	5	27
907	891 Maspons R, Escorsa P Flows of knowledge from and to cities: an analysis for Barcelona using patent statistics RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2004 AUG; 13 (2): 103-117	0	2	1	6
908	892 Frank B Incentives for basic research in a large institution: some general considerations and a case study RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2004 AUG; 13 (2): 119-127	0	0	1	32
909	901 Yapa G, de Silva MAT, de Silva ED Trends and shifts in Institutional productivity: natural products chemistry research in Sri Lanka RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2004 DEC; 13 (3): 167-174	0	0	4	14
910	952 Lewison G, Rippon I, Wooding S Tracking knowledge diffusion through citations RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2005 APR; 14 (1): 5-14	3	4	6	29
#	Date / Author / Journal	LCS	GCS	LCR	CR
911	953 Bornmann L, Daniel HD Committee peer review at an international research foundation: predictive validity and fairness of selection decisions on post-graduate fellowship applications RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2005 APR; 14 (1): 15-20	6	10	5	39
912	954 Laudel G Is external research funding a valid indicator for research performance? RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2005 APR; 14 (1): 27-34	1	5	8	23
913	955 Carayol N, Thi TUN Why do academic scientists engage in interdisciplinary research? RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2005 APR; 14 (1): 70-79	0	1	2	27
914	956 Luwel M Job advertisements as an indicator for mobility of researchers: Naturejobs as a case study RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2005 APR; 14 (1): 80-92	0	0	2	34
915	977 Jin BH, Rousseau R, Sun XX Key labs and open labs in the Chinese scientific research system: qualitative and quantitative evaluation indicators RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2005 AUG; 14 (2): 103-109	0	0	3	11
916	978 Costas R, Bordons M Bibliometric indicators at the micro-level: Some results in the area of natural resources at the Spanish CSIC RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2005 AUG; 14 (2): 110-120	8	9	7	34
917	979 Newman NC, Porter AL, Roessner JD, Kongthon A, Jin XY Differences over a decade: high tech capabilities and competitive performance of 28 nations RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2005 AUG; 14 (2): 121-128	0	1	5	24
918	980 Sigogneau A, Malagutti O, Crance M, Bauin S Cross-disciplinary research: co-evaluation and co-publication practices of the CNRS laboratories RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2005 AUG; 14 (2): 165-176	0	0	1	13
919	1005 Feeney MK, Bozeman B Taxonomy for science and engineering indicators: a reassessment RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2005 DEC; 14 (3): 239-248	0	1	3	58
920	1043 Laudel G, Origgi G Introduction to a special issue on the assessment of interdisciplinary research RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2006 APR; 15 (1): 2-4	1	4	2	13
#	Date / Author / Journal	LCS	GCS	LCR	CR
921	1044 Feller I Multiple actors, multiple settings, multiple criteria: issues in assessing interdisciplinary research RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2006 APR; 15 (1): 5-15	2	4	3	49
922	1045 Mansilla VB Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier: an empirical exploration RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2006 APR; 15 (1): 17-29	1	2	2	46
923	1046 Langfeldt L The policy challenges of peer review: managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessments RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2006 APR; 15 (1): 31-41	2	3	1	34
924	1047 Laudel G Conclave in the Tower of Babel: how peers review interdisciplinary research proposals RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2006 APR; 15 (1): 57-68	0	3	2	26
925	1078 Katz JS, Cothey V Web indicators for complex innovation systems RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2006 AUG; 15 (2): 85-95	2	7	4	41
926	1079 Lepori B Methodologies for the analysis of research funding and expenditure: from input to positioning indicators RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2006 AUG; 15 (2): 133-143	3	5	2	41
927	1097 Podlubny I, Kassayova K Towards a better list of citation superstars: compiling a multidisciplinary list of highly cited researchers RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2006 DEC; 15 (3): 154-162	3	5	3	19
928	1098 Porter AL, Roessner JD, Cohen AS, Perreault M Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2006 DEC; 15 (3): 187-195	4	8	7	38
929	1180 Ingwersen P, Larsen B Evaluation of strategic research programs: the case of Danish environmental research 1993-2002 RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2007 MAR; 16 (1): 47-57	0	0	7	12
930	1199 Bonaccorsi A, Daraio C, Lepori B, Sliperseter S Indicators on individual higher education institutions: Addressing data problems and comparability issues RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2007 JUN; 16 (2): 66-78	2	4	3	47
#	Date / Author / Journal	LCS	GCS	LCR	CR
931	1200 Van Leeuwen TN Modelling of bibliometric approaches and importance of output verification in research performance assessment RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2007 JUN; 16 (2): 93-105	3	2	0	3
932	1201 Orozco LA, Chavarro-Bohorquez DA, Olaya DL, Villaveces JL Methodology for measuring the socio-economic impacts of biotechnology: A case study of potatoes in Colombia RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2007 JUN; 16 (2): 107-122	0	0	2	37
933	1226 Reale E, Barbara A, Costantini A Peer review for the evaluation of academic research: lessons from the Italian experience RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2007 SEP; 16 (3): 216-228	0	0	7	22
934	1251 Donovan C, Butler L Testing novel quantitative indicators of research 'quality', esteem and 'user engagement': an economics pilot study RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2007 DEC; 16 (4): 231-242	0	1	3	23
935	1252 Czarnitzki D, Glanzel W, Hussinger K Patent and publication activities of German professors: an empirical assessment of their co-activity RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2007 DEC; 16 (4): 311-319	1	2	3	31
936	1302 Lepori B, Barre R, Filliatreau G New perspectives and challenges for the design and production of S&T indicators RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2008 MAR; 17 (1): 33-44	1	0	5	66
937	1303 Rons N, De Bruyn A, Cornelis J Research, evaluation per discipline: a peer-review method and its outcomes RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2008 MAR; 17 (1): 45-57	0	0	6	42
938	1304 Calero-Medina C, Lopez-Illescas C, Visser MS, Moed HF Important factors when interpreting bibliometric rankings of world universities: an example from oncology RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2008 MAR; 17 (1): 71-81	2	1	2	20
939	1326 Abramo G, D'Angelo CA, Di Costa F Assessment of sectoral aggregation distortion in research productivity measurements RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2008 JUN; 17 (2): 111-121	0	1	3	31
940	1327 Bornmann L, Wallon G, Ledin A Is the h index related to (standard) bibliometric measures and to the assessments by peers? An investigation of the h index by using molecular life sciences data RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2008 JUN; 17 (2): 149-156	4	3	12	37
#	Date / Author / Journal	LCS	GCS	LCR	CR
941	1328 van Leeuwen T Testing the validity of the Hirsch-index for research assessment purposes RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2008 JUN; 17 (2): 157-160	4	4	4	8
942	1389 Porter AL, Roessner JD, Heberger AE How interdisciplinary is a given body of research? RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2008 DEC; 17 (4): 273-282	0	1	8	28
943	1456 Tijssen RJW, van Leeuwen TN, van Wijk E Benchmarking university-industry research cooperation worldwide: performance measurements and indicators based on co-authorship data for the world's largest universities RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 MAR; 18 (1): 13-24	0	0	4	18
944	1457 Lewison G The percentage of reviews in research output: a simple measure of research esteem RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 MAR; 18 (1): 25-37	0	0	11	40
945	1458 Abramo G, D'Angelo CA Assessing technical and cost efficiency of research activities: a case study of the Italian university system RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 MAR; 18 (1): 61-70	0	0	3	26
946	1459 van Leeuwen T, Hoorens S, Grant J Using bibliometrics to support the procurement of NIHR biomedical research centres in England RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 MAR; 18 (1): 71-82	0	0	3	13
947	1497 Lepori B, Probst C Using curricula vitae for mapping scientific fields: a small-scale experience for Swiss communication sciences RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 JUN; 18 (2): 125-134	0	0	3	31
948	1498 Sandstrom U Combining curriculum vitae and bibliometric analysis: mobility, gender and research performance RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 JUN; 18 (2): 135-142	0	0	5	23
949	1530 Bornmann L, Mutz R, Daniel HD, Wallon G, Ledin A Are there really two types of h index variants? A validation study by using molecular life sciences data RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 SEP; 18 (3): 185-190	0	0	11	31
950	1531 Gorraiz J, Greil M, Mayer W, Reimann R, Schiebel E International publication output and research impact in social sciences: comparison of the Universities of Vienna, Zurich and Oslo RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 SEP; 18 (3): 221-232	0	0	5	15
#	Date / Author / Journal	LCS	GCS	LCR	CR
951	1532 Rons N, Amez L Impact vitality: an indicator based on citing publications in search of excellent scientists RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 SEP; 18 (3): 233-241	0	0	15	25
952	1533 Sandstrom U, Sandstrom E The field factor: towards a metric for academic institutions RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 SEP; 18 (3): 243-250	0	0	3	31
953	1534 Thijs B, Zimmerman E, Bar-Ilan J, Glanzel W Israeli research institutes: a dynamic and evaluative perspective RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 SEP; 18 (3): 251-260	0	0	6	16
954	249 LINDSEY D BUILDING A GREAT PUBLIC UNIVERSITY - THE ROLE OF FUNDING AT BRITISH AND AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION. 1991 APR; 32 (2): 217-244	0	1	4	37
955	317 FOGARTY TJ, SAFTNER DV ACADEMIC DEPARTMENT PRESTIGE - A NEW MEASURE BASED ON THE DOCTORAL STUDENT LABOR-MARKET RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION. 1993 AUG; 34 (4): 427-449	1	1	1	64
956	121 MOED HF, BURGER WJM, FRANKFORT JG, van Raan AFJ THE USE OF BIBLIOMETRIC DATA FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF UNIVERSITY-RESEARCH PERFORMANCE RESEARCH POLICY. 1985; 14 (3): 131-149	131	131	1	5
957	136 RIGTER H EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF HEALTH RESEARCH IN THE NETHERLANDS RESEARCH POLICY. 1986 FEB; 15 (1): 33-48	5	13	2	16
958	150 AMIR S ENVIRONMENTAL-RESEARCH IN ISRAEL - ON THE NEED FOR A NOVEL ORGANIZATIONAL-CHANGE RESEARCH POLICY. 1987 FEB; 16 (1): 17-27	0	0	1	27
959	157 IRVINE J, MARTIN BR, ABRAHAM J, PEACOCK T ASSESSING BASIC RESEARCH - REAPPRAISAL AND UPDATE OF AN EVALUATION OF 4 RADIO ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORIES RESEARCH POLICY. 1987 AUG; 16 (2-4): 213-227	6	10	5	31
960	212 PHILLIMORE AJ UNIVERSITY-RESEARCH PERFORMANCE INDICATORS IN PRACTICE - THE UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMITTEES EVALUATION OF BRITISH-UNIVERSITIES, 1985-86 RESEARCH POLICY. 1989 OCT; 18 (5): 255-271	3	11	4	68
#	Date / Author / Journal	LCS	GCS	LCR	CR
961	218 VANVIANEN BG, MOED HF, van Raan AFJ AN EXPLORATION OF THE SCIENCE BASE OF RECENT TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH POLICY. 1990 FEB; 19 (1): 61-81	35	36	0	9
962	231 GOMEZ I, SANZ E, MENDEZ A UTILITY OF BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS FOR RESEARCH POLICY - A CASE-STUDY OF SPANISH RESEARCH IN NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH POLICY. 1990 OCT; 19 (5): 457-466	1	14	3	22
963	232 ENGLISCH H, CZERWON HJ QUANTIFICATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF RESEARCH UNITS - A SIMPLE MATHEMATICAL-MODEL RESEARCH POLICY. 1990 OCT; 19 (5): 477-480	0	1	2	11
964	274 TIJSSEN RJW A QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF INTERDISCIPLINARY STRUCTURES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY - CO-CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS OF ENERGY RESEARCH RESEARCH POLICY. 1992 FEB; 21 (1): 27-44	20	32	2	15
965	275 ARCHIBUGI D, PIANTA M SPECIALIZATION AND SIZE OF TECHNOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES IN INDUSTRIAL-COUNTRIES - THE ANALYSIS OF PATENT DATA RESEARCH POLICY. 1992 FEB; 21 (1): 79-93	1	21	1	24
966	278 FRUMAU CCF CHOICES IN RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT AND BUSINESS PORTFOLIO IN THE ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY - WHAT THE BIBLIOMETRIC DATA SHOW RESEARCH POLICY. 1992 APR; 21 (2): 97-124	2	8	1	19
967	279 CALLON M, LAREDO P, RABEHARISOA V, GONARD T, LERAY T THE MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRAMS AND THE DYNAMICS OF TECHNOECONOMIC NETWORKS - THE CASE OF THE AFME RESEARCH POLICY. 1992 JUN; 21 (3): 215-236	2	33	1	42
968	303 PETERS HPF, van Raan AFJ CO-WORD-BASED SCIENCE MAPS OF CHEMICAL-ENGINEERING .1. REPRESENTATIONS BY DIRECT MULTIDIMENSIONAL-SCALING RESEARCH POLICY. 1993 FEB; 22 (1): 23-45	40	39	3	22
969	304 PETERS HPF, van Raan AFJ CO-WORD-BASED SCIENCE MAPS OF CHEMICAL-ENGINEERING .2. REPRESENTATIONS BY COMBINED CLUSTERING AND MULTIDIMENSIONAL-SCALING RESEARCH POLICY. 1993 FEB; 22 (1): 47-71	23	23	2	12
970	318 NEDERHOF AJ, van Raan AFJ A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF 6 ECONOMICS RESEARCH GROUPS - A COMPARISON WITH PEER-REVIEW RESEARCH POLICY. 1993 AUG; 22 (4): 353-368	36	36	7	19
#	Date / Author / Journal	LCS	GCS	LCR	CR
971	329 ENGELSMAN EC, van Raan AFJ A PATENT-BASED CARTOGRAPHY OF TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH POLICY. 1994 JAN; 23 (1): 1-26	23	23	5	22
972	354 DEBACKERE K, RAPPA MA INSTITUTIONAL VARIATIONS IN PROBLEM CHOICE AND PERSISTENCE AMONG SCIENTISTS IN AN EMERGING FIELD RESEARCH POLICY. 1994 JUL; 23 (4): 425-441	1	7	1	57
973	355 NOYONS ECM, van Raan AFJ, GRUPP H, SCHMOCH U EXPLORING THE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INTERFACE - INVENTOR AUTHOR RELATIONS IN LASER MEDICINE RESEARCH RESEARCH POLICY. 1994 JUL; 23 (4): 443-457	28	28	2	15
974	402 Kostoff RN Research requirements for research impact assessment RESEARCH POLICY. 1995 NOV; 24 (6): 869-882	3	6	1	68
975	403 Herbertz H, MullerHill B Quality and efficiency of basic research in molecular biology: A bibliometric analysis of thirteen excellent research institutes RESEARCH POLICY. 1995 NOV; 24 (6): 959-979	5	13	2	28
976	419 Godin B Research and the practice of publication in industries RESEARCH POLICY. 1996 JUN; 25 (4): 587-606	8	30	1	32
977	426 Moed HF, Hesselink FT The publication output and impact of academic chemistry research in the Netherlands during the 1980s: Bibliometric analyses and policy implications RESEARCH POLICY. 1996 AUG; 25 (5): 819-836	5	8	4	10
978	452 Tijssen RJW, Korevaar JC Unravelling the cognitive and interorganisational structure of public/private R&D networks: A case study of catalysis research in the Netherlands RESEARCH POLICY. 1997 JAN; 25 (8): 1277-1293	6	14	3	29
979	495 Geuna A Determinants of university participation in EU-funded R & D cooperative projects RESEARCH POLICY. 1998 FEB; 26 (6): 677-687	0	6	1	17
980	500 Tijssen RJW Quantitative assessment of large heterogeneous R & D networks: the case of process engineering in the Netherlands RESEARCH POLICY. 1998 APR; 26 (7-8): 791-809	1	15	4	25
#	Date / Author / Journal	LCS	GCS	LCR	CR
981	504 Rinia EJ, van Leeuwen TN, van Vuren HG, van Raan AFJ Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria - Evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands RESEARCH POLICY. 1998 MAY; 27 (1): 95-107	37	37	10	31
982	508 Noyons ECM, Luwel M, Moed HF Assessment of Flemish R&D in the field of information technology - A bibliometric evaluation based on publication and patent data, combined with OECD research input statistics RESEARCH POLICY. 1998 JUL; 27 (3): 285-300	3	6	2	14
983	515 Laestadius S The relevance of science and technology indicators: the case of pulp and paper RESEARCH POLICY. 1998 AUG; 27 (4): 385-395	0	6	1	49
984	528 Pavitt K The social shaping of the national science base RESEARCH POLICY. 1998 DEC; 27 (8): 793-805	7	45	2	75
985	529 Meyer-Krahmer F, Meyer-Krahmer F Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields RESEARCH POLICY. 1998 DEC; 27 (8): 835-851	10	102	3	75
986	548 Guice J Designing the future: the culture of new trends in science and technology RESEARCH POLICY. 1999 JAN; 28 (1): 81-98	0	12	0	83
987	602 Meyer M Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature RESEARCH POLICY. 2000 MAR; 29 (3): 409-434	21	70	3	50
988	663 Tijssen RJW Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows RESEARCH POLICY. 2001 JAN; 30 (1): 35-54	9	38	6	47
989	671 Rinia EJ, van Leeuwen TN, van Vuren HG, van Raan AFJ Influence of interdisciplinarity on peer-review and bibliometric evaluations in physics research RESEARCH POLICY. 2001 MAR; 30 (3): 357-361	21	21	2	9
990	757 van Raan AFJ, van Leeuwen TN Assessment of the scientific basis of interdisciplinary, applied research - Application of bibliometric methods in Nutrition and Food Research RESEARCH POLICY. 2002 MAY; 31 (4): 611-632	17	17	11	27
#	Date / Author / Journal	LCS	GCS	LCR	CR
991	770 Silverberg G The discrete charm of the bourgeoisie: quantum and continuous perspectives on innovation and growth RESEARCH POLICY. 2002 DEC; 31 (8-9): 1275-1289	1	5	1	44
992	804 Butler L Explaining Australia's increased share of ISI publications - the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts RESEARCH POLICY. 2003 JAN; 32 (1): 143-155	8	29	2	21
993	836 Acosta M, Coronado D Science-technology flows in Spanish regions - An analysis of scientific citations in patents RESEARCH POLICY. 2003 DEC; 32 (10): 1783-1803	3	14	10	85
994	981 Rigby J, Edler J Peering inside research networks: Some observations on the effect of the intensity of collaboration on the variability of research quality RESEARCH POLICY. 2005 AUG; 34 (6): 784-794	2	7	5	47
995	1006 von Wartburg I, Teichert T, Rost K Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis RESEARCH POLICY. 2005 DEC; 34 (10): 1591-1607	1	14	5	50
996	1034 Zhou P, Leydesdorff L The emergence of China as a leading nation in science RESEARCH POLICY. 2006 FEB; 35 (1): 83-104	11	51	5	50
997	1081 Katz JS Indicators for complex innovation systems RESEARCH POLICY. 2006 SEP; 35 (7): 893-909	3	5	4	59
998	1086 Groot T, Garcia-Valderrama T Research quality and efficiency - An analysis of assessments and management issues in Dutch economics and business research programs RESEARCH POLICY. 2006 NOV; 35 (9): 1362-1376	0	1	3	68
999	1099 Meyer M Are patenting scientists the better scholars? An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology RESEARCH POLICY. 2006 DEC; 35 (10): 1646-1662	3	16	10	90
1000	1187 Corrocher N, Malerba F, Montobbio F Schumpeterian patterns of innovative activity in the ICT field RESEARCH POLICY. 2007 APR; 36 (3): 418-432	2	3	5	48

Date / Author / Journal

901

Scoreboards of research excellence

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2003 AUG; 12 (2): 91-103

902

833 Aksnes DW

Characteristics of highly cited papers

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2003 DEC; 12 (3): 159-170

903

834 Porter AL, Newman NC, Myers WW, Schoeneck D

Projects and publications: interesting patterns in US Environmental Protection Agency research

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2003 DEC; 12 (3): 171-182

904

835 Grupp H

Evolution of a theory in economics: bibliometric assessment of search theory vis-a-vis game theory

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2003 DEC; 12 (3): 205-216

905

882 Glaser J, Spurling TH, Butler L

Intraorganisational evaluation: are there 'least evaluable units'

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2004 APR; 13 (1): 19-32

906

883 Aksnes DW, Taxt RE

Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2004 APR; 13 (1): 33-41

907

891 Maspons R, Escorsa P

Flows of knowledge from and to cities: an analysis for Barcelona using patent statistics

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2004 AUG; 13 (2): 103-117

908

892 Frank B

Incentives for basic research in a large institution: some general considerations and a case study

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2004 AUG; 13 (2): 119-127

909

901 Yapa G, de Silva MAT, de Silva ED

Trends and shifts in Institutional productivity: natural products chemistry research in Sri Lanka

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2004 DEC; 13 (3): 167-174

910

952 Lewison G, Rippon I, Wooding S

Tracking knowledge diffusion through citations

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2005 APR; 14 (1): 5-14

Date / Author / Journal

LCS

GCS

LCR

911

953 Bornmann L, Daniel HD

Committee peer review at an international research foundation: predictive validity and fairness of selection decisions on post-graduate fellowship applications

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2005 APR; 14 (1): 15-20

912

954 Laudel G

Is external research funding a valid indicator for research performance?

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2005 APR; 14 (1): 27-34

913

955 Carayol N, Thi TUN

Why do academic scientists engage in interdisciplinary research?

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2005 APR; 14 (1): 70-79

914

956 Luwel M

Job advertisements as an indicator for mobility of researchers: Naturejobs as a case study

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2005 APR; 14 (1): 80-92

915

977 Jin BH, Rousseau R, Sun XX

Key labs and open labs in the Chinese scientific research system: qualitative and quantitative evaluation indicators

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2005 AUG; 14 (2): 103-109

916

978 Costas R, Bordons M

Bibliometric indicators at the micro-level: Some results in the area of natural resources at the Spanish CSIC

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2005 AUG; 14 (2): 110-120

917

979 Newman NC, Porter AL, Roessner JD, Kongthon A, Jin XY

Differences over a decade: high tech capabilities and competitive performance of 28 nations

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2005 AUG; 14 (2): 121-128

918

980 Sigogneau A, Malagutti O, Crance M, Bauin S

Cross-disciplinary research: co-evaluation and co-publication practices of the CNRS laboratories

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2005 AUG; 14 (2): 165-176

919

1005 Feeney MK, Bozeman B

Taxonomy for science and engineering indicators: a reassessment

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2005 DEC; 14 (3): 239-248

920

1043 Laudel G, Origgi G

Introduction to a special issue on the assessment of interdisciplinary research

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2006 APR; 15 (1): 2-4

Date / Author / Journal

921

Multiple actors, multiple settings, multiple criteria: issues in assessing interdisciplinary research

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2006 APR; 15 (1): 5-15

922

1045 Mansilla VB

Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier: an empirical exploration

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2006 APR; 15 (1): 17-29

923

1046 Langfeldt L

The policy challenges of peer review: managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessments

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2006 APR; 15 (1): 31-41

924

1047 Laudel G

Conclave in the Tower of Babel: how peers review interdisciplinary research proposals

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2006 APR; 15 (1): 57-68

925

1078 Katz JS, Cothey V

Web indicators for complex innovation systems

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2006 AUG; 15 (2): 85-95

926

1079 Lepori B

Methodologies for the analysis of research funding and expenditure: from input to positioning indicators

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2006 AUG; 15 (2): 133-143

927

1097 Podlubny I, Kassayova K

Towards a better list of citation superstars: compiling a multidisciplinary list of highly cited researchers

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2006 DEC; 15 (3): 154-162

928

1098 Porter AL, Roessner JD, Cohen AS, Perreault M

Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2006 DEC; 15 (3): 187-195

929

1180 Ingwersen P, Larsen B

Evaluation of strategic research programs: the case of Danish environmental research 1993-2002

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2007 MAR; 16 (1): 47-57

930

1199 Bonaccorsi A, Daraio C, Lepori B, Sliperseter S

Indicators on individual higher education institutions: Addressing data problems and comparability issues

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2007 JUN; 16 (2): 66-78

Date / Author / Journal

931

Modelling of bibliometric approaches and importance of output verification in research performance assessment

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2007 JUN; 16 (2): 93-105

932

1201 Orozco LA, Chavarro-Bohorquez DA, Olaya DL, Villaveces JL

Methodology for measuring the socio-economic impacts of biotechnology: A case study of potatoes in Colombia

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2007 JUN; 16 (2): 107-122

933

1226 Reale E, Barbara A, Costantini A

Peer review for the evaluation of academic research: lessons from the Italian experience

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2007 SEP; 16 (3): 216-228

934

1251 Donovan C, Butler L

Testing novel quantitative indicators of research 'quality', esteem and 'user engagement': an economics pilot study

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2007 DEC; 16 (4): 231-242

935

1252 Czarnitzki D, Glanzel W, Hussinger K

Patent and publication activities of German professors: an empirical assessment of their co-activity

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2007 DEC; 16 (4): 311-319

936

1302 Lepori B, Barre R, Filliatreau G

New perspectives and challenges for the design and production of S&T indicators

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2008 MAR; 17 (1): 33-44

937

1303 Rons N, De Bruyn A, Cornelis J

Research, evaluation per discipline: a peer-review method and its outcomes

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2008 MAR; 17 (1): 45-57

938

1304 Calero-Medina C, Lopez-Illescas C, Visser MS, Moed HF

Important factors when interpreting bibliometric rankings of world universities: an example from oncology

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2008 MAR; 17 (1): 71-81

939

1326 Abramo G, D'Angelo CA, Di Costa F

Assessment of sectoral aggregation distortion in research productivity measurements

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2008 JUN; 17 (2): 111-121

940

1327 Bornmann L, Wallon G, Ledin A

Is the h index related to (standard) bibliometric measures and to the assessments by peers? An investigation of the h index by using molecular life sciences data

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2008 JUN; 17 (2): 149-156

Date / Author / Journal

941

Testing the validity of the Hirsch-index for research assessment purposes

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2008 JUN; 17 (2): 157-160

942

1389 Porter AL, Roessner JD, Heberger AE

How interdisciplinary is a given body of research?

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2008 DEC; 17 (4): 273-282

943

1456 Tijssen RJW, van Leeuwen TN, van Wijk E

Benchmarking university-industry research cooperation worldwide: performance measurements and indicators based on co-authorship data for the world's largest universities

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 MAR; 18 (1): 13-24

944

1457 Lewison G

The percentage of reviews in research output: a simple measure of research esteem

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 MAR; 18 (1): 25-37

945

1458 Abramo G, D'Angelo CA

Assessing technical and cost efficiency of research activities: a case study of the Italian university system

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 MAR; 18 (1): 61-70

946

1459 van Leeuwen T, Hoorens S, Grant J

Using bibliometrics to support the procurement of NIHR biomedical research centres in England

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 MAR; 18 (1): 71-82

947

1497 Lepori B, Probst C

Using curricula vitae for mapping scientific fields: a small-scale experience for Swiss communication sciences

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 JUN; 18 (2): 125-134

948

1498 Sandstrom U

Combining curriculum vitae and bibliometric analysis: mobility, gender and research performance

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 JUN; 18 (2): 135-142

949

1530 Bornmann L, Mutz R, Daniel HD, Wallon G, Ledin A

Are there really two types of h index variants? A validation study by using molecular life sciences data

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 SEP; 18 (3): 185-190

950

1531 Gorraiz J, Greil M, Mayer W, Reimann R, Schiebel E

International publication output and research impact in social sciences: comparison of the Universities of Vienna, Zurich and Oslo

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 SEP; 18 (3): 221-232

Date / Author / Journal

951

Impact vitality: an indicator based on citing publications in search of excellent scientists

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 SEP; 18 (3): 233-241

952

1533 Sandstrom U, Sandstrom E

The field factor: towards a metric for academic institutions

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 SEP; 18 (3): 243-250

953

1534 Thijs B, Zimmerman E, Bar-Ilan J, Glanzel W

Israeli research institutes: a dynamic and evaluative perspective

RESEARCH EVALUATION. 2009 SEP; 18 (3): 251-260

954

249 LINDSEY D

BUILDING A GREAT PUBLIC UNIVERSITY - THE ROLE OF FUNDING AT BRITISH AND AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES

RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION. 1991 APR; 32 (2): 217-244

955

317 FOGARTY TJ, SAFTNER DV

ACADEMIC DEPARTMENT PRESTIGE - A NEW MEASURE BASED ON THE DOCTORAL STUDENT LABOR-MARKET

RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION. 1993 AUG; 34 (4): 427-449

956

121 MOED HF, BURGER WJM, FRANKFORT JG, van Raan AFJ

THE USE OF BIBLIOMETRIC DATA FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF UNIVERSITY-RESEARCH PERFORMANCE

RESEARCH POLICY. 1985; 14 (3): 131-149

131

957

136 RIGTER H

EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF HEALTH RESEARCH IN THE NETHERLANDS

RESEARCH POLICY. 1986 FEB; 15 (1): 33-48

958

150 AMIR S

ENVIRONMENTAL-RESEARCH IN ISRAEL - ON THE NEED FOR A NOVEL ORGANIZATIONAL-CHANGE

RESEARCH POLICY. 1987 FEB; 16 (1): 17-27

959

157 IRVINE J, MARTIN BR, ABRAHAM J, PEACOCK T

ASSESSING BASIC RESEARCH - REAPPRAISAL AND UPDATE OF AN EVALUATION OF 4 RADIO ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORIES

RESEARCH POLICY. 1987 AUG; 16 (2-4): 213-227

960

212 PHILLIMORE AJ

UNIVERSITY-RESEARCH PERFORMANCE INDICATORS IN PRACTICE - THE UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMITTEES EVALUATION OF BRITISH-UNIVERSITIES, 1985-86

RESEARCH POLICY. 1989 OCT; 18 (5): 255-271

Date / Author / Journal

LCS

GCS

LCR

961

218 VANVIANEN BG, MOED HF, van Raan AFJ

AN EXPLORATION OF THE SCIENCE BASE OF RECENT TECHNOLOGY

RESEARCH POLICY. 1990 FEB; 19 (1): 61-81

962

231 GOMEZ I, SANZ E, MENDEZ A

UTILITY OF BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS FOR RESEARCH POLICY - A CASE-STUDY OF SPANISH RESEARCH IN NEUROSCIENCE

RESEARCH POLICY. 1990 OCT; 19 (5): 457-466

963

232 ENGLISCH H, CZERWON HJ

QUANTIFICATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF RESEARCH UNITS - A SIMPLE MATHEMATICAL-MODEL

RESEARCH POLICY. 1990 OCT; 19 (5): 477-480

964

274 TIJSSEN RJW

A QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF INTERDISCIPLINARY STRUCTURES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY - CO-CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS OF ENERGY RESEARCH

RESEARCH POLICY. 1992 FEB; 21 (1): 27-44

965

275 ARCHIBUGI D, PIANTA M

SPECIALIZATION AND SIZE OF TECHNOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES IN INDUSTRIAL-COUNTRIES - THE ANALYSIS OF PATENT DATA

RESEARCH POLICY. 1992 FEB; 21 (1): 79-93

966

278 FRUMAU CCF

CHOICES IN RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT AND BUSINESS PORTFOLIO IN THE ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY - WHAT THE BIBLIOMETRIC DATA SHOW

RESEARCH POLICY. 1992 APR; 21 (2): 97-124

967

279 CALLON M, LAREDO P, RABEHARISOA V, GONARD T, LERAY T

THE MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRAMS AND THE DYNAMICS OF TECHNOECONOMIC NETWORKS - THE CASE OF THE AFME

RESEARCH POLICY. 1992 JUN; 21 (3): 215-236

968

303 PETERS HPF, van Raan AFJ

CO-WORD-BASED SCIENCE MAPS OF CHEMICAL-ENGINEERING .1. REPRESENTATIONS BY DIRECT MULTIDIMENSIONAL-SCALING

RESEARCH POLICY. 1993 FEB; 22 (1): 23-45

969

304 PETERS HPF, van Raan AFJ

CO-WORD-BASED SCIENCE MAPS OF CHEMICAL-ENGINEERING .2. REPRESENTATIONS BY COMBINED CLUSTERING AND MULTIDIMENSIONAL-SCALING

RESEARCH POLICY. 1993 FEB; 22 (1): 47-71

970

318 NEDERHOF AJ, van Raan AFJ

A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF 6 ECONOMICS RESEARCH GROUPS - A COMPARISON WITH PEER-REVIEW

RESEARCH POLICY. 1993 AUG; 22 (4): 353-368

Date / Author / Journal

LCS

GCS

LCR

971

329 ENGELSMAN EC, van Raan AFJ

A PATENT-BASED CARTOGRAPHY OF TECHNOLOGY

RESEARCH POLICY. 1994 JAN; 23 (1): 1-26

972

354 DEBACKERE K, RAPPA MA

INSTITUTIONAL VARIATIONS IN PROBLEM CHOICE AND PERSISTENCE AMONG SCIENTISTS IN AN EMERGING FIELD

RESEARCH POLICY. 1994 JUL; 23 (4): 425-441

973

355 NOYONS ECM, van Raan AFJ, GRUPP H, SCHMOCH U

EXPLORING THE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INTERFACE - INVENTOR AUTHOR RELATIONS IN LASER MEDICINE RESEARCH

RESEARCH POLICY. 1994 JUL; 23 (4): 443-457

974

402 Kostoff RN

Research requirements for research impact assessment

RESEARCH POLICY. 1995 NOV; 24 (6): 869-882

975

403 Herbertz H, MullerHill B

Quality and efficiency of basic research in molecular biology: A bibliometric analysis of thirteen excellent research institutes

RESEARCH POLICY. 1995 NOV; 24 (6): 959-979

976

419 Godin B

Research and the practice of publication in industries

RESEARCH POLICY. 1996 JUN; 25 (4): 587-606

977

426 Moed HF, Hesselink FT

The publication output and impact of academic chemistry research in the Netherlands during the 1980s: Bibliometric analyses and policy implications

RESEARCH POLICY. 1996 AUG; 25 (5): 819-836

978

452 Tijssen RJW, Korevaar JC

Unravelling the cognitive and interorganisational structure of public/private R&D networks: A case study of catalysis research in the Netherlands

RESEARCH POLICY. 1997 JAN; 25 (8): 1277-1293

979

495 Geuna A

Determinants of university participation in EU-funded R & D cooperative projects

RESEARCH POLICY. 1998 FEB; 26 (6): 677-687

980

500 Tijssen RJW

Quantitative assessment of large heterogeneous R & D networks: the case of process engineering in the Netherlands

RESEARCH POLICY. 1998 APR; 26 (7-8): 791-809

Date / Author / Journal

LCS

GCS

LCR

981

504 Rinia EJ, van Leeuwen TN, van Vuren HG, van Raan AFJ

Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria - Evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands

RESEARCH POLICY. 1998 MAY; 27 (1): 95-107

982

508 Noyons ECM, Luwel M, Moed HF

Assessment of Flemish R&D in the field of information technology - A bibliometric evaluation based on publication and patent data, combined with OECD research input statistics

RESEARCH POLICY. 1998 JUL; 27 (3): 285-300

983

515 Laestadius S

The relevance of science and technology indicators: the case of pulp and paper

RESEARCH POLICY. 1998 AUG; 27 (4): 385-395

984

528 Pavitt K

The social shaping of the national science base

RESEARCH POLICY. 1998 DEC; 27 (8): 793-805

985

529 Meyer-Krahmer F, Meyer-Krahmer F

Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields

RESEARCH POLICY. 1998 DEC; 27 (8): 835-851

102

986

548 Guice J

Designing the future: the culture of new trends in science and technology

RESEARCH POLICY. 1999 JAN; 28 (1): 81-98

987

602 Meyer M

Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature

RESEARCH POLICY. 2000 MAR; 29 (3): 409-434

988

663 Tijssen RJW

Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows

RESEARCH POLICY. 2001 JAN; 30 (1): 35-54

989

671 Rinia EJ, van Leeuwen TN, van Vuren HG, van Raan AFJ

Influence of interdisciplinarity on peer-review and bibliometric evaluations in physics research

RESEARCH POLICY. 2001 MAR; 30 (3): 357-361

990

757 van Raan AFJ, van Leeuwen TN

Assessment of the scientific basis of interdisciplinary, applied research - Application of bibliometric methods in Nutrition and Food Research

RESEARCH POLICY. 2002 MAY; 31 (4): 611-632

Date / Author / Journal

991

The discrete charm of the bourgeoisie: quantum and continuous perspectives on innovation and growth

RESEARCH POLICY. 2002 DEC; 31 (8-9): 1275-1289

992

804 Butler L

Explaining Australia's increased share of ISI publications - the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts

RESEARCH POLICY. 2003 JAN; 32 (1): 143-155

993

836 Acosta M, Coronado D

Science-technology flows in Spanish regions - An analysis of scientific citations in patents

RESEARCH POLICY. 2003 DEC; 32 (10): 1783-1803

994

981 Rigby J, Edler J

Peering inside research networks: Some observations on the effect of the intensity of collaboration on the variability of research quality

RESEARCH POLICY. 2005 AUG; 34 (6): 784-794

995

1006 von Wartburg I, Teichert T, Rost K

Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis

RESEARCH POLICY. 2005 DEC; 34 (10): 1591-1607

996

1034 Zhou P, Leydesdorff L

The emergence of China as a leading nation in science

RESEARCH POLICY. 2006 FEB; 35 (1): 83-104

997

1081 Katz JS

Indicators for complex innovation systems

RESEARCH POLICY. 2006 SEP; 35 (7): 893-909

998

1086 Groot T, Garcia-Valderrama T

Research quality and efficiency - An analysis of assessments and management issues in Dutch economics and business research programs

RESEARCH POLICY. 2006 NOV; 35 (9): 1362-1376

999

1099 Meyer M

Are patenting scientists the better scholars? An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology

RESEARCH POLICY. 2006 DEC; 35 (10): 1646-1662

1000

1187 Corrocher N, Malerba F, Montobbio F

Schumpeterian patterns of innovative activity in the ICT field

RESEARCH POLICY. 2007 APR; 36 (3): 418-432

Anthony F.J. van Raan & the citing papers Publications by Anthony F.J. van Raan and the papers citing AFJ van Raan.	Historiographs	Glossary HistCite Guide About Grand Totals: LCS 6574, GCS 20261, CR 59438 Collection span: 1971 - 2009
List of All Records