Record 961 View: Standard | Glossary HistCite Guide |
Author(s): Al U (Al, Umut); Soydal I (Soydal, Irem); Yalcin H (Yalcin, Haydar)
Title: An Evaluation of the Bibliometric Features of bilig
Source: BILIG (55): 1-20
Date: 2010 FAL
Document Type: Journal : Article
DOI:
Language: Turkish
Comment:
Address: [Al, Umut; Soydal, Irem] Dr Hacettepe Univ, Fac Letters, Dept Informat Management, Ankara, Turkey.
[Yalcin, Haydar] Hacettepe Univ Lib, Ankara, Turkey. Reprint: Al, U, Dr Hacettepe Univ, Fac Letters, Dept Informat Management,
Ankara, Turkey. E-mail:
Author Keywords: bilig; bibliometrics co-citation analysis; social network analysis
KeyWords Plus: SOCIAL-SCIENCE PUBLICATIONS; NETWORK ANALYSIS; OUTPUT
Abstract: bilig has been indexed by the Social Sciences Citation Index since 2008 This study examines bilig and the bibliometric features of its Publications in citation Indexes The following research questions are addressed 1) What are the institutional affiliations of the authors of the publications? 2) Is multiple authorship a prevalent feature of the publications? 3) Which types of sources (books, journal articles, etc) get cited more often in the publications? 4) What are the most frequently cited journals in bilig? 5) What is the rate of literature obsolescence in bilig? Moreover, this,study examines the relationships among the cited authors in bilig by using social network analysis method In conclusion, it is found that almost all of the publications are written in Turkish An important part of the contributors is affiliated with Gazi, Hacettepe and Baskent Universities Books receive 65% of all citations in Wig Half of the sources cited in bilig have been published in the last 16 years
Cited References: *AHM YES U, 2010, BIL *THOMS REUT, 2010, SOC SCI CIT IND AR S *ULAKBIM, 2010, ISI WEB SCI WOSDA IN AL U, 2004, BILGI DUNYASI, V5, P19 AL U, 2006, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V57, P1011, DOI 10.1002/asi.20366 AL U, 2007, TURK KUTUPHANEALIGI, V21, P142 AL U, 2008, THESIS ANKARA HACETT AL U, 2009, BILGI DUN YASI, V10, P231 BIRINCI HG, 2008, BILGI DUNYASI, V9, P348 CAWKELL T, 2001, CENTURY SCI PUBLISHI, P149 CHEN CM, 2006, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V57, P359, DOI 10.1002/asi.20317 FREEMAN LC, 2004, DEV SOCIAL NETWORK A GARFIELD E, 1988, CURRENT CONTENTS, V35, P3 GARFIELD E, 1994, THOMSON REUTERS IMPA GULGOZ S, 2002, SCIENTOMETRICS, V55, P103 GURSAKAL N, 2009, SOSYAL AG ANAL HIRSCH JE, 2005, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V102, P16569, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0507655102 LAWANI SM, 1981, LIBRI, V31, P294 ORBAY M, 2007, BIBLIOS, V8, P1 OTTE E, 2002, J INF SCI, V28, P441 PRITCHARD A, 1969, J DOC, V25, P348 SCOTT J, 1988, SOCIOLOGY, V22, P109 TONTA Y, 1997, TURK PSIKOL DERG, V12, P67 UZUN A, 1998, INT INF LIBR REV, V30, P169 VONDERDENKEL A, 1999, TURKIYEDE SOSYAL BIL WHITE EC, 1985, SPEC LIBR, V76, P35 YALCIN H, 2010, MILLI FOLKLOR, V22, P205 |