Use wildcard '*' to add more than one file at a time.
For example, if you have file1,
file2, etc. all in the same folder or directory;
first, locate one of the files with the [Browse...] button. Then alter the
file path in the box above to include '*' character (eg. file*).
Wildcard '?' to blanket only one character works too.
Note: In Windows you can select multiple files and "drag and drop" them
onto HistCite icon or shortcut. The program would start and load those files.
| # | Date / Author / Journal | LCS | GCS | LCR | CR
|
|---|
| 901 | 299 CARNS HRANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 1966; 17: 295-&
| 7 | 48 | 3 | 112
|
| 902 | 354 SIBOAKA TANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 1969; 20: 165-&
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 112
|
| 903 | 723 THEOLOGIS AANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1986; 37: 407-438
| 4 | 181 | 10 | 112
|
| 904 | 893 BADGER MR, PRICE GDANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1994; 45: 369-392
| 2 | 268 | 0 | 112
|
| 905 | 1175 Sung S, Amasino RMANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2005; 56: 491-508
| 1 | 68 | 3 | 112
|
| 906 | 1224 Tanaka R, Tanaka AANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2007; 58: 321-346
| 1 | 44 | 4 | 112
|
| 907 | 1246 Paul MJ, Primavesi LF, Jhurreea D, Zhang YHANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2008; 59: 417-441
| 0 | 11 | 1 | 112
|
| 908 | 136 YEMM EW, FOLKES BFANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1958; 9: 245-280
| 6 | 42 | 4 | 111
|
| 909 | 643 PRATT LHANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1982; 33: 557-582
| 3 | 100 | 2 | 111
|
| 910 | 698 THORNE JHANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1985; 36: 317-343
| 3 | 199 | 4 | 111
|
| # | Date / Author / Journal | LCS | GCS | LCR | CR
|
|---|
| 911 | 1137 Winkel BSJANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2004; 55: 85-107
| 4 | 128 | 2 | 111
|
| 912 | 1182 Kehoe DM, Gutu AANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2006; 57: 127-150
| 1 | 21 | 3 | 111
|
| 913 | 30 STUMPF PKANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1952; 3: 17-34
| 6 | 33 | 2 | 110
|
| 914 | 192 TAYLOR JHANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1961; 12: 327-&
| 1 | 8 | 1 | 110
|
| 915 | 1090 Ye ZHANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2002; 53: 183-202
| 1 | 98 | 3 | 110
|
| 916 | 1098 Leyser OANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2002; 53: 377-398
| 2 | 89 | 0 | 110
|
| 917 | 27 THOMAS MDANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1951; 2: 293-322
| 5 | 86 | 0 | 109
|
| 918 | 119 ILJIN WSANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1957; 8: 257-274
| 3 | 135 | 2 | 109
|
| 919 | 129 BERNSTEIN L, HAYWARD HEANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1958; 9: 25-46
| 4 | 332 | 2 | 109
|
| 920 | 146 FRENKEL AWANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1959; 10: 53-70
| 5 | 36 | 1 | 109
|
| # | Date / Author / Journal | LCS | GCS | LCR | CR
|
|---|
| 921 | 214 JACOBS WPANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1962; 13: 403-&
| 4 | 66 | 3 | 109
|
| 922 | 522 PITMAN MGANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1977; 28: 71-88
| 3 | 123 | 5 | 109
|
| 923 | 1004 Whetten RW, MacKay JJ, Sederoff RRANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1998; 49: 585-609
| 1 | 178 | 1 | 109
|
| 924 | 1050 Sze H, Liang F, Hwang I, Curran AC, Harper JFANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 2000; 51: 433-462
| 2 | 115 | 2 | 109
|
| 925 | 1181 Hussey PJ, Ketelaar T, Deeks MJANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2006; 57: 109-125
| 2 | 45 | 2 | 109
|
| 926 | 635 FARQUHAR GD, SHARKEY TDANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1982; 33: 317-345
| 6 | 1367 | 2 | 108
|
| 927 | 673 DARVILL AG, ALBERSHEIM PANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1984; 35: 243-275
| 11 | 648 | 0 | 108
|
| 928 | 774 TAYLOR WCANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1989; 40: 211-233
| 9 | 294 | 3 | 108
|
| 929 | 786 MANSFIELD TA, HETHERINGTON AM, ATKINSON CJANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1990; 41: 55-75
| 2 | 236 | 7 | 108
|
| 930 | 814 COEN ESANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1991; 42: 241-279
| 1 | 148 | 1 | 108
|
| # | Date / Author / Journal | LCS | GCS | LCR | CR
|
|---|
| 931 | 838 ORT DR, OXBOROUGH KANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1992; 43: 269-291
| 1 | 56 | 1 | 108
|
| 932 | 1047 Hudson AANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 2000; 51: 349-370
| 0 | 30 | 0 | 108
|
| 933 | 1131 Weckwerth WANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2003; 54: 669-689
| 0 | 148 | 1 | 108
|
| 934 | 1184 Nelson T, Tausta SL, Gandotra N, Liu TANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2006; 57: 181-201
| 1 | 34 | 0 | 108
|
| 935 | 1195 Tsukaya HANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2006; 57: 477-496
| 1 | 53 | 0 | 108
|
| 936 | 1208 Rockwell NC, Su YS, Lagarias JCANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2006; 57: 837-858
| 2 | 117 | 6 | 108
|
| 937 | 37 BAWDEN FC, PIRIE NWANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1952; 3: 171-188
| 4 | 38 | 1 | 107
|
| 938 | 98 BENNETT CWANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1956; 7: 143-170
| 3 | 45 | 0 | 107
|
| 939 | 212 SLATYER ROANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1962; 13: 351-&
| 2 | 22 | 5 | 107
|
| 940 | 489 DURE LSANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1975; 26: 259-278
| 3 | 168 | 0 | 107
|
| # | Date / Author / Journal | LCS | GCS | LCR | CR
|
|---|
| 941 | 530 SOLOMOS TANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1977; 28: 279-297
| 6 | 208 | 7 | 107
|
| 942 | 843 PORTIS ARANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1992; 43: 415-437
| 5 | 159 | 2 | 107
|
| 943 | 874 SEMBDNER G, PARTHIER BANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1993; 44: 569-589
| 2 | 482 | 3 | 107
|
| 944 | 898 MALKIN S, CANAANI OANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1994; 45: 493-526
| 0 | 72 | 2 | 107
|
| 945 | 1056 Richards DE, King KE, Ait-ali T, Harberd NPANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 2001; 52: 67-88
| 3 | 155 | 3 | 107
|
| 946 | 1176 Mudgett MBANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2005; 56: 509-531
| 0 | 120 | 1 | 107
|
| 947 | 1234 Baker NRANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2008; 59: 89-113
| 0 | 41 | 1 | 107
|
| 948 | 123 ESAU K, CURRIER HB, CHEADLE VIANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1957; 8: 349-374
| 1 | 53 | 5 | 106
|
| 949 | 361 ZELITCH IANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 1969; 20: 329-&
| 1 | 116 | 1 | 106
|
| 950 | 423 NORTHCOT.DHANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 1972; 23: 113-&
| 5 | 190 | 2 | 106
|
| # | Date / Author / Journal | LCS | GCS | LCR | CR
|
|---|
| 951 | 731 RANJEVA R, BOUDET AMANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1987; 38: 73-93
| 6 | 246 | 3 | 106
|
| 952 | 870 VERMAAS WANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1993; 44: 457-481
| 2 | 105 | 0 | 106
|
| 953 | 979 Evans MMS, Barton MKANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1997; 48: 673-701
| 1 | 45 | 2 | 106
|
| 954 | 1233 Bowman JL, Floyd SKANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2008; 59: 67-88
| 1 | 13 | 1 | 106
|
| 955 | 1274 Simon SA, Zhai JX, Nandety RS, McCormick KP, Zeng J, et al.ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2009; 60: 305-333
| 0 | 3 | 1 | 106
|
| 956 | 43 HUBER BANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1952; 3: 333-346
| 0 | 4 | 0 | 105
|
| 957 | 87 DIMOND AEANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1955; 6: 329-350
| 3 | 55 | 0 | 105
|
| 958 | 255 TRANQUIL.WANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 1964; 15: 345-&
| 1 | 80 | 1 | 105
|
| 959 | 852 MARECHALDROUARD L, WEIL JH, DIETRICH AANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1993; 44: 13-32
| 2 | 73 | 1 | 105
|
| 960 | 899 SHIBAOKA HANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1994; 45: 527-544
| 5 | 229 | 3 | 105
|
| # | Date / Author / Journal | LCS | GCS | LCR | CR
|
|---|
| 961 | 967 Golden SS, Ishiura M, Johnson CH, Kondo TANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1997; 48: 327-354
| 0 | 95 | 0 | 105
|
| 962 | 1020 Campbell WHANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1999; 50: 277-+
| 2 | 191 | 2 | 105
|
| 963 | 1113 Curie C, Briat JFANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2003; 54: 183-206
| 1 | 118 | 1 | 105
|
| 964 | 1134 Rasmusson AG, Soole KL, Elthon TEANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2004; 55: 23-39
| 1 | 78 | 5 | 105
|
| 965 | 1270 Banks JAANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2009; 60: 223-238
| 0 | 2 | 3 | 105
|
| 966 | 1279 Freeling MANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2009; 60: 433-453
| 0 | 5 | 0 | 105
|
| 967 | 99 BROWN JCANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1956; 7: 171-190
| 3 | 57 | 2 | 104
|
| 968 | 240 BENSON AAANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 1964; 15: 1-&
| 3 | 169 | 2 | 104
|
| 969 | 442 BRANDES HANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1973; 24: 115-128
| 1 | 20 | 3 | 104
|
| 970 | 480 MILLERD AANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1975; 26: 53-72
| 5 | 168 | 7 | 104
|
| # | Date / Author / Journal | LCS | GCS | LCR | CR
|
|---|
| 971 | 722 COSGROVE DANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1986; 37: 377-405
| 5 | 244 | 6 | 104
|
| 972 | 778 HAHLBROCK K, SCHEEL DANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1989; 40: 347-369
| 10 | 923 | 2 | 104
|
| 973 | 845 ZAMBRYSKI PCANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1992; 43: 465-490
| 2 | 245 | 0 | 104
|
| 974 | 868 SPREITZER RJANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1993; 44: 411-434
| 1 | 90 | 3 | 104
|
| 975 | 897 GATENBY AA, VIITANEN PVANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1994; 45: 469-491
| 0 | 35 | 1 | 104
|
| 976 | 906 GOODENOUGH UW, ARMBRUST EV, CAMPBELL AM, FERRIS PJANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1995; 46: 21-44
| 1 | 35 | 0 | 104
|
| 977 | 985 Brown JWS, Simpson CGANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1998; 49: 77-95
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 104
|
| 978 | 1061 Wang XMANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 2001; 52: 211-+
| 1 | 86 | 0 | 104
|
| 979 | 1238 van der Hoorn RALANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2008; 59: 191-223
| 1 | 18 | 0 | 104
|
| 980 | 1275 Kirby J, Keasling JDANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2009; 60: 335-355
| 0 | 4 | 1 | 104
|
| # | Date / Author / Journal | LCS | GCS | LCR | CR
|
|---|
| 981 | 218 NAF UANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1962; 13: 507-&
| 1 | 19 | 1 | 103
|
| 982 | 223 NEWCOMB EHANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1963; 14: 43-&
| 5 | 68 | 2 | 103
|
| 983 | 340 LEGGETT JEANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 1968; 19: 333-&
| 4 | 25 | 5 | 103
|
| 984 | 662 GIFFORD EMANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1983; 34: 419-440
| 1 | 43 | 2 | 103
|
| 985 | 710 HARRIS NANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1986; 37: 73-92
| 3 | 48 | 3 | 103
|
| 986 | 1046 Oparka KJ, Cruz SSANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 2000; 51: 323-347
| 2 | 110 | 3 | 103
|
| 987 | 64 GODDARD DR, STAFFORD HAANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1954; 5: 115-132
| 5 | 45 | 3 | 102
|
| 988 | 95 BUNNING EANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1956; 7: 71-90
| 5 | 79 | 0 | 102
|
| 989 | 737 VANHUYSTEE RBANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1987; 38: 205-219
| 1 | 144 | 2 | 102
|
| 990 | 887 GEIGER DR, SERVAITES JCANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1994; 45: 235-256
| 1 | 107 | 8 | 102
|
| # | Date / Author / Journal | LCS | GCS | LCR | CR
|
|---|
| 991 | 997 Kerfeld CA, Krogmann DWANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1998; 49: 397-425
| 1 | 54 | 2 | 102
|
| 992 | 1143 Harper JE, Breton G, Harmon AANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2004; 55: 263-288
| 2 | 73 | 1 | 102
|
| 993 | 1170 McSteen P, Leyser OANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2005; 56: 353-374
| 1 | 83 | 0 | 102
|
| 994 | 68 PENTZER WT, HEINZE PHANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1954; 5: 205-224
| 4 | 29 | 1 | 101
|
| 995 | 502 DUDA CTANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1976; 27: 119-132
| 0 | 53 | 1 | 101
|
| 996 | 563 MCCANDLESS EL, CRAIGIE JSANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1979; 30: 41-53
| 0 | 87 | 1 | 101
|
| 997 | 696 EDWARDS GE, NAKAMOTO H, BURNELL JN, HATCH MDANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 1985; 36: 255-286
| 3 | 142 | 1 | 101
|
| 998 | 1041 Fagard M, Vaucheret HANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. 2000; 51: 167-194
| 0 | 136 | 2 | 101
|
| 999 | 1125 Berthold DA, Stenmark PANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2003; 54: 497-517
| 0 | 37 | 3 | 101
|
| 1000 | 1152 Komeda YANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY. 2004; 55: 521-535
| 0 | 72 | 1 | 101
|